Role of Retinoic Acid and Fibroblast Growth Factor 2 in Neural Differentiation from Cynomolgus Monkey (Macaca fascicularis) Embryonic Stem Cells

Retinoic acid is a widely used factor in both mouse and human embryonic stem cells. It suppresses differentiation to mesoderm and enhances differentiation to ectoderm. Fibroblast growth factor 2 (FGF2) is widely used to induce differentiation to neurons in mice, yet in primates, including humans, it maintains embryonic stem cells in the undifferentiated state. In this study, we established an FGF2 low-dose-dependent embryonic stem cell line from cynomolgus monkeys and then analyzed neural differentiation in cultures supplemented with retinoic acid and FGF2. When only retinoic acid was added to culture, neurons differentiated from FGF2 low-dose-dependent embryonic stem cells. When both retinoic acid and FGF2 were added, neurons and astrocytes differentiated from the same embryonic stem cell line. Thus, retinoic acid promotes the differentiation from embryonic stem cells to neuroectoderm. Although FGF2 seems to promote self-renewal in stem cells, its effects on the differentiation of stem cells are influenced by the presence or absence of supplemental retinoic acid.Abbreviations: EB, embryoid body; ES, embryonic stem; ESM, embryonic stem cell medium; FGF, fibroblast growth factor; GFAP, glial fibrillary acidic protein; LIF, leukemia inhibitory factor; MBP, myelin basic protein; RA, retinoic acid; SSEA, stage-specific embryonic antigen; TRA, tumor-related antigenPluripotent stem cells are potential sources of material for cell replacement therapy and are useful experimental tools for in vitro models of human disease and drug screening. Embryonic stem (ES) cells are capable of extensive proliferation and multilineage differentiation, and thus ES-derived cells are suitable for use in cell-replacement therapies.^18,23 Reported ES cell characteristics including tumorigenic potential, DNA methylation status, expression of imprinted genes, and chromatin structure were elucidated by using induced pluripotent stem cells.^2,11,17 Because the social expectations of regeneration medicine are growing, we must perform basic research with ES cells, which differ from induced pluripotent stem cells in terms of origin, differentiation ability, and epigenetic status.^2,8Several advances in research have been made by using mouse ES cells. Furthermore, primate ES cell lines have been established from rhesus monkeys (Macaca mulatta),²⁴ common marmosets (Callithrix jacchus),²⁵ cynomolgus monkeys (M. fascicularis),²⁰ and African green monkeys (Chlorocebus aethiops).¹⁹ Mouse and other mammalian ES cells differ markedly in their responses to the signaling pathways that support self-renewal.^8,28 Mouse ES cells require leukemia inhibitory factor (LIF)–STAT3 signaling.¹⁴ In contrast, primate ES cells do not respond to LIF. Fibroblast growth factor 2 (FGF2) appears to be the most upstream self-renewal factor in primate ES cells. FGF2 also exerts its effects through indirect mechanisms, such as the TGFβ–Activin–Nodal signaling pathway, in primate ES cells.²¹ In addition to the biologic similarities between monkeys and humans, ES cells derived from cynomolgus monkeys or human blastocysts have extensive similarities that are not apparent in mouse ES cells.^8,14,21,28 Numerous monkey ES cell lines are now available, and cynomolgus monkeys are an efficient model for developing strategies to investigate the efficacy of ES-cell–based medical treatments in humans.Several growth factors and chemical compounds, including retinoic acid (RA),^4,9,13,22,26 FGF2,^9,10,16,22 epidermal growth factor,^9,22 SB431542,^1,4,10 dorsomorphin,^10,27 sonic hedgehog,^{12,13,16,27,29} and noggin,^1,4,9,27 are essential for the differentiation and proliferation or maintenance of neural stem cells derived from primate ES cells. Of these factors, active RA signaling suppresses a mesodermal fate by inhibiting Wnt and Nodal signaling pathways during in vitro culture and leads to neuroectoderm differentiation in ES cells.^4,13,26 RA is an indispensable factor for the specialization to neural cells. FGF2 is important during nervous system development,¹² and FGF2 and RA both are believed to influence the differentiation to neural cells. The current study was done to clarify the mechanism of RA and FGF2 in the induction of differentiation along the neural lineage.We recently established a monkey ES cell line that does not need FGF2 supplementation for maintenance of the undifferentiated state. This ES cell line allowed us to study the role of differentiation to neural cells with RA and enabled us to compare ES cell differentiation in the context of supplementation with RA or FGF2 in culture. To this end, we established a novel cynomolgus monkey cell line derived from ES cells and maintained it in an undifferentiated state in the absence of FGF2 supplementation.     

Tumorigenic potential is restored during differentiation in fusion-reprogrammed cancer cells

Detailed understanding of the mechanistic steps underlying tumor initiation and malignant progression is critical for insights of potentially novel therapeutic modalities. Cellular reprogramming is an approach of particular interest because it can provide a means to reset the differentiation state of the cancer cells and to revert these cells to a state of non-malignancy. Here, we investigated the relationship between cellular differentiation and malignant progression by the fusion of four independent mouse cancer cell lines from different tissues, each with differing developmental potentials, to pluripotent mouse embryonic stem (ES) cells. Fusion was accompanied by loss of differentiated properties of the four parental cancer cell lines and concomitant emergence of pluripotency, demonstrating the feasibility to reprogram the malignant and differentiative properties of cancer cells. However, the original malignant and differentiative phenotypes re-emerge upon withdrawal of the fused cells from the embryonic environment in which they were maintained. cDNA array analysis of the malignant hepatoma progression implicated a role for Foxa1, and silencing Foxa1 prevented the re-emergence of malignant and differentiation-associated gene expression. Our findings support the hypothesis that tumor progression results from deregulation of stem cells, and our approach provides a strategy to analyze possible mechanisms in the cancer initiation.Investigations into cancer formation are most often focused on the accumulation of specific genetic and epigenetic alterations that alter the expression of the oncogenes and tumor suppressors regulating cell cycle, apoptosis, DNA repair, cell adhesion and signaling.^{1, 2, 3} Less often considered, the tumorigenic process can also be regarded from a standpoint of a dynamic relationship between malignant progression and cellular differentiation.⁴ During the course of development, normal stem cells differentiate into specific types of cells by exchanging and interpreting signaling molecules with the surrounding microenvironment. Accumulating evidence indicates that cancer cells may also release and receive cues from the surroundings that contribute to malignant progression.⁵ However, how tumor cell–niche interactions drive malignancy remains a critical gap in our overall understanding of the cancer process, and understanding this process has significant potential in providing new prognosis strategy for therapeutic intervention at early stages of cancer development.Reprogramming can alter differentiation properties of adult cells, and this approach may be exploitable to reverse the malignant programming in cancer cells.⁶ Published reports documented the use of nuclear transfer by implanting the nuclei of mouse melanoma,^{7, 8} embryonic carcinoma⁸ and medulloblastoma⁹ into mouse oocytes. Although the nuclear transferred cells regained pluripotent potential, the malignant properties remained, indicating incomplete reprogramming in reproductive and therapeutic cloning with this approach.^{10, 11} Separately, defined factors OSMK (Oct4, Sox2, c-Myc and Klf4) were tested for the ability to reprogram both solid and liquid malignant tumors including chronic myeloid leukemia,^{12, 13} gastrointestinal cancer,¹⁴ melanoma¹⁵ and sarcoma cells.^{16, 17} Using the OSMK approach, late-stage cancer cells could revert back to an earlier state, bolstering enthusiasm for the discovery of new insights in cancer initiation and progression. However, OSKM-reprogrammed cells had limited pluripotency and altered tumorigenic potential during re-dedifferentiation. Moreover, the OSKM approach to promote pluripotency was effective only on a limited subset of cancer types.¹⁸ The shortcomings of OSMK may be due to the presence of oncongenic factors (c-Myc and Klf4) or to the intrinsic defects of the strategy.^{19, 20} Most importantly, these shortcomings hinder the use of OSKM approach to investigate tumor progression in reprogrammed cancer cells.ES cell-induced fusion provides a more efficient and effective reprogramming strategy to test the reversibility of tumorigenic potential. In previous studies using normal adult cells, the normal cell fusion hybrids exhibited epigenetic characteristics similar to ES cells, such as reactivation of histone modifications and a DNA hypomethylation state within the Oct4 promoter.^{21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29} We generated a fusion hybrid of mouse hepatoma cells and mouse embryonic stem (ES) cells previously.³⁰ The resultant ES-Hepa hybrids forfeited tumorigenic properties, but the forfeiture was reversible and tumorigenic properties re-emerge upon removal of the cells from embryonic environments. We observed that H3K27 trimethylation, which was independent of H3K9 dimethylation, was an early event in the silencing of p16^INK4a during re-emergence of the tumorigenic profile, a finding that was supported by a number of other groups studying the progression mechanisms of hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC).^{30, 31, 32} These previous research highlighted the remarkable developmental plasticity of HCC during cancer progression and engendered two important questions. First, is developmental plasticity a ubiquitous phenomenon in all cancer progression? Second, how does lineage specification relate to cancer progression? While the reprogramming approach holds significant promise for future cancer therapies, current data also caution that partial or incomplete reprogramming can lead to a worse outcome by inducing more invasive phenotypes.³³ Clearly, much critical knowledge remains to be learned regarding the association between the differentiation and tumorigenic phenotypes in cellular reprogramming and the molecular events driving these events.Here, we present data showing that four cancer cell lines, each endowed with distinct lineage-differentiated characteristics, were reprogrammed by fusion with ES cells to yield ES-cancer hybrids with characteristics similar to pluripotent ES cells with diminished tumorigenic gene expression patterns. We observed that the sustainability of pluripotent ES characteristics was dependent on environmental cues. Removal of cells from embryonic culturing conditions resulted in the re-emergence of the original differentiated and tumorigenic gene expression patterns. cDNA array and RT-PCR data in malignant hepatoma progression discovered Foxa1 as a potential checkpoint regulator, affecting a network of 224 genes that might be participants for the differentiation and malignant progression. Silencing of Foxa1 inhibited the re-emergence of the malignant and differentiated pattern of gene expression. Our observations suggest that cell fusion-mediated reprogramming is a novel and potentially useful strategy for the identification and testing of molecules involved in cancer initiation and progression, with exploitable modalities for new cancer therapies.     

New-Onset Diabetes Mellitus After Transplantation in a Cynomolgus Macaque (Macaca fasicularis)

A 5.5-y-old intact male cynomolgus macaque (Macaca fasicularis) presented with inappetence and weight loss 57 d after heterotopic heart and thymus transplantation while receiving an immunosuppressant regimen consisting of tacrolimus, mycophenolate mofetil, and methylprednisolone to prevent graft rejection. A serum chemistry panel, a glycated hemoglobin test, and urinalysis performed at presentation revealed elevated blood glucose and glycated hemoglobin (HbA1c) levels (727 mg/dL and 10.1%, respectively), glucosuria, and ketonuria. Diabetes mellitus was diagnosed, and insulin therapy was initiated immediately. The macaque was weaned off the immunosuppressive therapy as his clinical condition improved and stabilized. Approximately 74 d after discontinuation of the immunosuppressants, the blood glucose normalized, and the insulin therapy was stopped. The animal''s blood glucose and HbA1c values have remained within normal limits since this time. We suspect that our macaque experienced new-onset diabetes mellitus after transplantation, a condition that is commonly observed in human transplant patients but not well described in NHP. To our knowledge, this report represents the first documented case of new-onset diabetes mellitus after transplantation in a cynomolgus macaque.Abbreviations: NODAT, new-onset diabetes mellitus after transplantationNew-onset diabetes mellitus after transplantation (NODAT, formerly known as posttransplantation diabetes mellitus) is an important consequence of solid-organ transplantation in humans.^{7-10,15,17,19,21,25-28,31,33,34,37,38,42} A variety of risk factors have been identified including increased age, sex (male prevalence), elevated pretransplant fasting plasma glucose levels, and immunosuppressive therapy.^{7-10,15,17,19,21,25-28,31,33,34,37,38,42} The relationship between calcineurin inhibitors, such as tacrolimus and cyclosporin, and the development of NODAT is widely recognized in human medicine.^{7-10,15,17,19,21,25-28,31,33,34,37,38,42} Cynomolgus macaques (Macaca fasicularis) are a commonly used NHP model in organ transplantation research. Cases of natural and induced diabetes of cynomolgus monkeys have been described in the literature;^14,43,45 however, NODAT in a macaque model of solid-organ transplantation has not been reported previously to our knowledge.     

p62/SQSTM1 upregulation constitutes a survival mechanism that occurs during granulocytic differentiation of acute myeloid leukemia cells

The p62/SQSTM1 adapter protein has an important role in the regulation of several key signaling pathways and helps transport ubiquitinated proteins to the autophagosomes and proteasome for degradation. Here, we investigate the regulation and roles of p62/SQSTM1 during acute myeloid leukemia (AML) cell maturation into granulocytes. Levels of p62/SQSTM1 mRNA and protein were both significantly increased during all-trans retinoic acid (ATRA)-induced differentiation of AML cells through a mechanism that depends on NF-κB activation. We show that this response constitutes a survival mechanism that prolongs the life span of mature AML cells and mitigates the effects of accumulation of aggregated proteins that occurs during granulocytic differentiation. Interestingly, ATRA-induced p62/SQSTM1 upregulation was impaired in maturation-resistant AML cells but was reactivated when differentiation was restored in these cells. Primary blast cells of AML patients and CD34⁺ progenitors exhibited significantly lower p62/SQSTM1 mRNA levels than did mature granulocytes from healthy donors. Our results demonstrate that p62/SQSTM1 expression is upregulated in mature compared with immature myeloid cells and reveal a pro-survival function of the NF-κB/SQSTM1 signaling axis during granulocytic differentiation of AML cells. These findings may help our understanding of neutrophil/granulocyte development and will guide the development of novel therapeutic strategies for refractory and relapsed AML patients with previous exposure to ATRA.p62 or sequestosome 1 (p62/SQSTM1) is a scaffold protein, implicated in a variety of biological processes including those that control cell death, inflammation, and metabolism.^{1, 2} Through its multi-domain structure, p62/SQSTM1 interacts specifically with key signaling proteins, including atypical PKC family members, NF-κB, and mTOR to control cellular responses.^{3, 4, 5, 6, 7} p62/SQSTM1 functions also as a key mediator of autophagy. Through its interaction with LC3, an essential protein involved in autophagy, p62/SQSTM1 selectively directs ubiquitinated substrates to autophagosomes leading to their subsequent degradation in lysosomes.^{8, 9} At the molecular level, p62/SQSTM1 acts as a pro-tumoral molecule by ensuring efficient and selective activation of cell signaling axes involved in cell survival, proliferation, and metabolism (i.e., NF-κB, mTOR, and Nrf-2 pathways).^{3, 5, 6, 7, 10, 11, 12, 13} p62/SQSTM1 can also signal anti-tumoral responses either by inactivating the pro-oncogenic signaling through BCR-ABL¹⁴ and Wnt pathways^{15, 16} or by inducing the activation of caspase 8, a pro-death protein.^{17, 18} Interestingly, in response to stress, autophagy promotes the degradation of p62, thus limits the activation of p62-regulatory pathways that control tumorigenesis.¹⁰ In addition, p62/SQSTM1 controls pathways that modulate differentiation of normal and cancerous cells. For example, p62/SQSTM1 has been shown to antagonize basal ERK activity and adipocyte differentiation.¹⁹ In contrast, p62/SQSTM1 favors differentiation of osteoclasts,²⁰ osteoblasts,²¹ neurons,²² megakaryocytes²³ and macrophages.²⁴ The role and regulation of p62/SQSTM1 during leukemia cell differentiation has been poorly documented.Acute myeloid leukemia (AML) is a hematological disease characterized by multiple deregulated pathways resulting in a blockade of myeloid precursors at different stages of maturation.^{25, 26} Acute promyelocyte leukemia (APL) is the M3 type of AML characterized by an arrest of the terminal differentiation of promyelocytes into granulocytes and frequently associated with the expression of the oncogenic PML-RAR alpha fusion gene.^{27, 28} All-trans retinoic acid (ATRA), a potent activator of cellular growth arrest, differentiation, and death of APL cells, has been shown to effectively promote complete clinical remission of APL when combined with chemotherapy.^{29, 30, 31} Despite the success of this treatment, some APL patients are refractory to ATRA treatment or relapse owing to the development of resistance to ATRA in leukemia cells.^{32, 33, 34}Our previous results revealed that autophagy flux is activated during granulocyte differentiation of myeloid leukemia cell lines induced by ATRA.³⁵ In the present study, we observed that p62/SQSTM1, an autophagic substrate, is markedly upregulated at both mRNA and protein levels during the granulocytic differentiation process. Here, we investigated the regulation and the function of p62/SQSTM1 during AML cells differentiation into neutrophils/granulocytes.     

Restoration of miR-101 suppresses lung tumorigenesis through inhibition of DNMT3a-dependent DNA methylation

The deregulation of miR-101 and DNMT3a has been implicated in the pathogenesis of multiple tumor types, but whether and how miR-101 silencing and DNMT3a overexpression contribute to lung tumorigenesis remain elusive. Here we show that miR-101 downregulation associates with DNMT3a overexpression in lung cancer cell lines and patient tissues. Ectopic miR-101 expression remarkably abrogated the DNMT3a 3′-UTR luciferase activity corresponding to the miR-101 binding site and caused an attenuated expression of endogenous DNMT3a, which led to a reduction of global DNA methylation and the re-expression of tumor suppressor CDH1 via its promoter DNA hypomethylation. Functionally, restoration of miR-101 expression suppressed lung cancer cell clonability and migration, which recapitulated the DNMT3a knockdown effects. Interestingly, miR-101 synergized with decitabine to downregulate DNMT3a and to reduce DNA methylation. Importantly, ectopic miR-101 expression was sufficient to trigger in vivo lung tumor regression and the blockage of metastasis. Consistent with these phenotypes, examination of xenograft tumors disclosed an increase of miR-101, a decrease of DNMT3a and the subsequent DNA demethylation. These findings support that the loss or suppression of miR-101 function accelerates lung tumorigenesis through DNMT3a-dependent DNA methylation, and suggest that miR-101-DNMT3a axis may have therapeutic value in treating refractory lung cancer.Owing to a high propensity for recurrence and a high rate of metastasis at the advanced stages,^{1, 2, 3} lung cancer remains the leading cause of cancer-related mortality. DNA methylation is a major epigenetic rule controlling chromosomal stability and gene expression.^{4, 5} It is under control of DNA methyltransferases (DNMTs), whose overexpression in lung cancer cells predicts worse outcomes.^{6, 7} It is postulated that DNMT overexpression induces DNA hypermethylation and silencing of tumor suppressor genes (TSGs), leading to an aggressive lung cancer. Indeed, enforced expression of DNMT1 or DNMT3a increases DNA methylation, while the abolition of DNMT expression by genetic depletion, microRNAs (miRs) or small molecules reduces genome-wide and gene-specific DNA methylation and restores TSG expression.^{8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13} As TSGs are the master controllers for cell multiplicity and their silencing predicts poor prognosis,^{14, 15} TSG re-expression via promoter DNA hypomethylation inhibits cell proliferation and induces cell differentiation.^{13, 16} Thus, DNMT gene abundance could serve as a target for anticancer therapy, but how DNMT upregulation occurs in lung cancer is incompletely understood.MiRs are small non-coding RNAs that crucially regulate target gene expression. Up to 30% of all protein-coding genes are predicted to be targeted by miRs,^{17, 18} supporting the key roles of miRs in controlling cell fate.^{19, 20, 21, 22} Research is showing that certain miRs are frequently dysregulated in cancers, including lung cancer.^{7, 23, 24} As miR targets can promote or inhibit cancer cell expansion, miRs have huge potential for acting as bona fide oncogenes (i.e., miR-21) or TSGs (i.e., miR-29b).^{7, 25} We and others demonstrated that the levels of DNMT1 or DNMT3a or DNMT3b are regulated by miR-29b, miR-148, miR-152 or miR-30c,^{7, 13, 26, 27} and overexpression of these miRs results in DNA hypomethylation and TSG reactivation with the concurrent blockage of cancer cell proliferation.^{7, 13} These findings underscore the importance of miRs as epigenetic modulators and highlight their therapeutic applications.MiR-101 is frequently silenced in human cancers^{28, 29, 30, 31} and, importantly, exhibits antitumorigenic properties when overexpressed. Mechanistically, miR-101 inactivation by genomic loss causes the overexpression of EZH2, a histone methyltransferase, via 3′-UTR targeting, which is followed by histone hypermethylation and aggressive tumorigenesis.^{29, 30, 32} However, whether and how miR-101 silencing contributes to DNA hypermethylation patterning in lung cancer is unclear. In this study, we explore the role of miR-101 in regulating DNMT3a expression and the impacts of miR-101-DNMT3a nexus on lung cancer pathogenesis. We showed that the expression of miR-101 and DNMT3a was negatively correlated in lung cancer. We presented evidence that ectopic miR-101 expression decreased DNMT3a levels, reduced global DNA methylation and upregulated CDH1 via its promoter DNA demethylation. The biological significance of miR-101-mediated DNA hypomethylation and CDH1 re-expression was evident by its inhibition of lung tumor cell growth in vitro and in vivo. Thus, our findings mechanistically and functionally link miR-101 silencing to DNA hypermethylation in lung cancer cells.     

Plasma membrane poration by opioid neuropeptides: a possible mechanism of pathological signal transduction

Neuropeptides induce signal transduction across the plasma membrane by acting through cell-surface receptors. The dynorphins, endogenous ligands for opioid receptors, are an exception; they also produce non-receptor-mediated effects causing pain and neurodegeneration. To understand non-receptor mechanism(s), we examined interactions of dynorphins with plasma membrane. Using fluorescence correlation spectroscopy and patch-clamp electrophysiology, we demonstrate that dynorphins accumulate in the membrane and induce a continuum of transient increases in ionic conductance. This phenomenon is consistent with stochastic formation of giant (~2.7 nm estimated diameter) unstructured non-ion-selective membrane pores. The potency of dynorphins to porate the plasma membrane correlates with their pathogenic effects in cellular and animal models. Membrane poration by dynorphins may represent a mechanism of pathological signal transduction. Persistent neuronal excitation by this mechanism may lead to profound neuropathological alterations, including neurodegeneration and cell death.Neuropeptides are the largest and most diverse family of neurotransmitters. They are released from axon terminals and dendrites, diffuse to pre- or postsynaptic neuronal structures and activate membrane G-protein-coupled receptors. Prodynorphin (PDYN)-derived opioid peptides including dynorphin A (Dyn A), dynorphin B (Dyn B) and big dynorphin (Big Dyn) consisting of Dyn A and Dyn B are endogenous ligands for the κ-opioid receptor. Acting through this receptor, dynorphins regulate processing of pain and emotions, memory acquisition and modulate reward induced by addictive substances.^{1, 2, 3, 4} Furthermore, dynorphins may produce robust cellular and behavioral effects that are not mediated through opioid receptors.^{5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29} As evident from pharmacological, morphological, genetic and human neuropathological studies, these effects are generally pathological, including cell death, neurodegeneration, neurological dysfunctions and chronic pain. Big Dyn is the most active pathogenic peptide, which is about 10- to 100-fold more potent than Dyn A, whereas Dyn B does not produce non-opioid effects.^{16, 17, 22, 25} Big Dyn enhances activity of acid-sensing ion channel-1a (ASIC1a) and potentiates ASIC1a-mediated cell death in nanomolar concentrations^{30, 31} and, when administered intrathecally, induces characteristic nociceptive behavior at femtomolar doses.^{17, 22} Inhibition of endogenous Big Dyn degradation results in pathological pain, whereas prodynorphin (Pdyn) knockout mice do not maintain neuropathic pain.^{22, 32} Big Dyn differs from its constituents Dyn A and Dyn B in its unique pattern of non-opioid memory-enhancing, locomotor- and anxiolytic-like effects.²⁵Pathological role of dynorphins is emphasized by the identification of PDYN missense mutations that cause profound neurodegeneration in the human brain underlying the SCA23 (spinocerebellar ataxia type 23), a very rare dominantly inherited neurodegenerative disorder.^{27, 33} Most PDYN mutations are located in the Big Dyn domain, demonstrating its critical role in neurodegeneration. PDYN mutations result in marked elevation in dynorphin levels and increase in its pathogenic non-opioid activity.^{27, 34} Dominant-negative pathogenic effects of dynorphins are not produced through opioid receptors.ASIC1a, glutamate NMDA (N-methyl-d-aspartate) and AMPA (α-amino-3-hydroxy-5-methyl-4-isoxazolepropionic acid)/kainate ion channels, and melanocortin and bradykinin B2 receptors have all been implicated as non-opioid dynorphin targets.^{5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 30, 31, 35, 36} Multiplicity of these targets and their association with the cellular membrane suggest that their activation is a secondary event triggered by a primary interaction of dynorphins with the membrane. Dynorphins are among the most basic neuropeptides.^{37, 38} The basic nature is also a general property of anti-microbial peptides (AMPs) and amyloid peptides that act by inducing membrane perturbations, altering membrane curvature and causing pore formation that disrupts membrane-associated processes including ion fluxes across the membrane.³⁹ The similarity between dynorphins and these two peptide groups in overall charge and size suggests a similar mode of their interactions with membranes.In this study, we dissect the interactions of dynorphins with the cell membrane, the primary event in their non-receptor actions. Using fluorescence imaging, correlation spectroscopy and patch-clamp techniques, we demonstrate that dynorphin peptides accumulate in the plasma membrane in live cells and cause a profound transient increase in cell membrane conductance. Membrane poration by endogenous neuropeptides may represent a novel mechanism of signal transduction in the brain. This mechanism may underlie effects of dynorphins under pathological conditions including chronic pain and tissue injury.     

The Fcp1-Wee1-Cdk1 axis affects spindle assembly checkpoint robustness and sensitivity to antimicrotubule cancer drugs

To grant faithful chromosome segregation, the spindle assembly checkpoint (SAC) delays mitosis exit until mitotic spindle assembly. An exceedingly prolonged mitosis, however, promotes cell death and by this means antimicrotubule cancer drugs (AMCDs), that impair spindle assembly, are believed to kill cancer cells. Despite malformed spindles, cancer cells can, however, slip through SAC, exit mitosis prematurely and resist killing. We show here that the Fcp1 phosphatase and Wee1, the cyclin B-dependent kinase (cdk) 1 inhibitory kinase, play a role for this slippage/resistance mechanism. During AMCD-induced prolonged mitosis, Fcp1-dependent Wee1 reactivation lowered cdk1 activity, weakening SAC-dependent mitotic arrest and leading to mitosis exit and survival. Conversely, genetic or chemical Wee1 inhibition strengthened the SAC, further extended mitosis, reduced antiapoptotic protein Mcl-1 to a minimum and potentiated killing in several, AMCD-treated cancer cell lines and primary human adult lymphoblastic leukemia cells. Thus, the Fcp1-Wee1-Cdk1 (FWC) axis affects SAC robustness and AMCDs sensitivity.The spindle assembly checkpoint (SAC) delays mitosis exit to coordinate anaphase onset with spindle assembly. To this end, SAC inhibits the ubiquitin ligase Anaphase-Promoting Complex/Cyclosome (APC/C) to prevent degradation of the anaphase inhibitor securin and cyclin B, the major mitotic cyclin B-dependent kinase 1 (cdk1) activator, until spindle assembly.¹ However, by yet poorly understood mechanisms, exceedingly prolonging mitosis translates into cell death induction.^{2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7} Although mechanistic details are still missing on how activation of cell death pathways is linked to mitosis duration, prolongation of mitosis appears crucial for the ability of antimicrotubule cancer drugs (AMCDs) to kill cancer cells.^{2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7} These drugs, targeting microtubules, impede mitotic spindle assembly and delay mitosis exit by chronically activating the SAC. Use of these drugs is limited, however, by toxicity and resistance. A major mechanism for resistance is believed to reside in the ability of cancer cells to slip through the SAC and exit mitosis prematurely despite malformed spindles, thus resisting killing by limiting mitosis duration.^{2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7} Under the AMCD treatment, cells either die in mitosis or exit mitosis, slipping through the SAC, without or abnormally dividing.^{2, 3, 4} Cells that exit mitosis either die at later stages or survive and stop dividing or proliferate, giving rise to resistance.^{2, 3, 4} Apart from a role for p53, what dictates cell fate is still unknown; however, it appears that the longer mitosis is protracted, the higher the chances for cell death pathway activation are.^{2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7}Although SAC is not required per se for killing,⁶ preventing SAC adaptation should improve the efficacy of AMCD by increasing mitosis duration.^{2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7} Therefore, further understanding of the mechanisms by which cells override SAC may help to improve the current AMCD therapy. Several kinases are known to activate and sustain SAC, and cdk1 itself appears to be of primary relevance.^{1, 8, 9} By studying mitosis exit and SAC resolution, we recently reported a role for the Fcp1 phosphatase to bring about cdk1 inactivation.^{10, 11} Among Fcp1 targets, we identified cyclin degradation pathway components, such as Cdc20, an APC/C co-activator, USP44, a deubiquitinating enzyme, and Wee1.^{10, 11} Wee1 is a crucial kinase that controls the G2 phase by performing inhibitory phosphorylation of cdk1 at tyr-15 (Y15-cdk1). Wee1 is also in a feedback relationship with cdk1 itself that, in turn, can phosphorylate and inhibit Wee1 in an autoamplification loop to promote the G2-to-M phase transition.¹² At mitosis exit, Fcp1 dephosphorylated Wee1 at threonine 239, a cdk1-dependent inhibitory phosphorylation, to dampen down the cdk1 autoamplification loop, and Cdc20 and USP44, to promote APC/C-dependent cyclin B degradation.^{10, 11, 12} In this study we analysed the Fcp1 relevance in SAC adaptation and AMCD sensitivity.     

Daytime Blue Light Enhances the Nighttime Circadian Melatonin Inhibition of Human Prostate Cancer Growth

Light controls pineal melatonin production and temporally coordinates circadian rhythms of metabolism and physiology in normal and neoplastic tissues. We previously showed that peak circulating nocturnal melatonin levels were 7-fold higher after daytime spectral transmittance of white light through blue-tinted (compared with clear) rodent cages. Here, we tested the hypothesis that daytime blue-light amplification of nocturnal melatonin enhances the inhibition of metabolism, signaling activity, and growth of prostate cancer xenografts. Compared with male nude rats housed in clear cages under a 12:12-h light:dark cycle, rats in blue-tinted cages (with increased transmittance of 462–484 nm and decreased red light greater than 640 nm) evinced over 6-fold higher peak plasma melatonin levels at middark phase (time, 2400), whereas midlight-phase levels (1200) were low (less than 3 pg/mL) in both groups. Circadian rhythms of arterial plasma levels of linoleic acid, glucose, lactic acid, pO₂, pCO₂, insulin, leptin, and corticosterone were disrupted in rats in blue cages as compared with the corresponding entrained rhythms in clear-caged rats. After implantation with tissue-isolated PC3 human prostate cancer xenografts, tumor latency-to-onset of growth and growth rates were markedly delayed, and tumor cAMP levels, uptake–metabolism of linoleic acid, aerobic glycolysis (Warburg effect), and growth signaling activities were reduced in rats in blue compared with clear cages. These data show that the amplification of nighttime melatonin levels by exposing nude rats to blue light during the daytime significantly reduces human prostate cancer metabolic, signaling, and proliferative activities.Abbreviations: A-V, arterial–venous difference, ipRGC, intrinsically photosensitive retinal ganglion cell, LA, linoleic acid, 13-HODE, 13-hydroxyoctadecadienoic acid, TFA, total fatty acidsLight profoundly influences circadian, neuroendocrine, and neurobehavioral regulation in all mammals and is essential to life on our planet.^{2,15,28, 40} The light–dark cycle entrains the master biologic clock, located in the suprachiasmatic nucleus of the brain, in an intensity-, duration-, and wavelength-dependent manner.^8-13 Photobiologic responses, including circadian rhythms of metabolism and physiology, are mediated by organic molecules called ‘chromophores,’ which are contained within a small subset of retinal cells, called the intrinsically sensitive retinal ganglion cells (ipRGC).^{16,29,31,36,41,49,53,59} In humans and rodents light quanta are detected by the chromophore melanopsin, which detects light quanta in principally the short-wavelength, blue-appearing portion of the spectrum (446 to 477 nm), and transmits its photic information via the retinohypothalamic tract to the ‘molecular clock’ of the suprachiasmatic nucleus. This region of the brain regulates the daily pineal gland production of the circadian neurohormone melatonin (N-acetyl-5-methoxytryptamine), which results in high levels produced at night and low levels during daytime.^38,54 The daily, rhythmic melatonin signal provides temporal coordination of normal behavioral and physiologic functions including chronobiologic rhythms of locomotor activity,² sleep-wake cycle,^2,14 dietary and water intake,^2,51 hormone secretion and metabolism.^5,44,47,61 Alterations in light intensity, duration, and spectral quality at a given time of day,^{8-13,17,19-22,24,61} such as occurs in night-shift workers exposed to light at night,^26,34,46,57 acutely suppresses endogenous melatonin levels in most mammalian species^{9,11,44,45,54,55} and may lead to various disease states, including metabolic syndrome^5,61 and carcinogenesis.^4-7,17,18Recent studies from our laboratory^{5,20,23-25,60,61} have demonstrated that relatively small changes in the spectral transmittance (color) of light passing through translucent amber (>590 nm), blue (>480 nm), and red-tinted (>640 nm) polycarbonate laboratory rodent cages, compared with standard polycarbonate clear cages (390 to 700 nm), during the light phase markedly influenced the normal nighttime melatonin signal and disrupted temporal coordination of metabolism and physiology.^19,24,61 Most notable was our discovery that, in both male and female pigmented nude rats maintained in blue-tinted rodent cages, nighttime melatonin levels were as much as 7 times higher than normal nighttime peak levels in animals maintained in all other cage types.¹⁹ An earlier study in human subjects diagnosed with midwinter insomnia coupled with low nighttime melatonin levels demonstrated that daily exposure to intense morning bright polychromatic light therapy for up to one week resulted in a restoration of nocturnal melatonin levels to those of control subjects.³⁵ In another study, exposure to blue-tinted (470 nm) LED light (100 lx) for approximately 20 min in the morning after 2 sleep-restricted (6 h) nights led to earlier onset of the melatonin surge at nighttime.³⁰In the United States alone this year, approximately 240,000 men will be diagnosed with prostate cancer, and nearly 30,000 will die from this disease (National Cancer Institute; www.cancer.gov/). Epidemiologic studies have shown that night shift work, which involves circadian disruption, including nocturnal melatonin suppression, markedly increases prostate cancer risk in men.^{26,34,46,57,58} Both in vitro and in vivo studies have demonstrated that melatonin inhibits human prostate cancer growth, including that of androgen-receptor–negative, castration-resistant PC3 human prostate cancer cells.^20,29,42,56 Cancer cells depend primarily on aerobic glycolysis (Warburg effect) over oxidative phosphorylation to meet their bioenergetic needs supporting biomass formation.⁵ The Warburg effect is characterized by increased cellular uptake of glucose and production of lactate despite an abundance of oxygen. Investigations have shown that signal transduction pathways that include AKT, MEK, NFκB, GS3Kβ, and PDK1 drive the Warburg effect.^5,61 In addition, cancer cells rely on increased uptake of the ω6 fatty acid linoleic acid (LA), which is prevalent in the western diet.^4-6 In most cancers, LA uptake occurs through a cAMP-dependent transport mechanism, and LA is metabolized to the mitogenic agent 13-hydroxyoctadecadienoic acid (13-HODE). In most tumors, 13-HODE plays an important role in enhancing downstream phosphorylation of ERK 1/2, AKT, and activation of the Warburg effect, thereby leading to increased cell proliferation and tumor growth.^4-6 Melatonin, the principal neurohormone of the pineal gland and whose production is regulated by the suprachiasmatic nucleus,^4,5 modulates processes of tumor initiation, progression, and growth in vivo.⁵ The circadian nocturnal melatonin signal not only inhibits LA uptake and metabolism, the Warburg effect in human cancer xenografts, and ultimately tumor growth, but it actually drives circadian rhythms in tumor metabolism, signal transduction activity, and cell proliferation. These effects are extinguished when melatonin production is suppressed by light exposure at night.⁵In the present investigation, we examined the hypothesis that the spectral transmittance (color) of short-wavelength (480 nm) bright light passing through blue-tinted standard laboratory rodent cages during the light phase not only amplifies the normal circadian nocturnal melatonin signal but also enhances the inhibition of the metabolism, signaling activity, and growth progression of human PC3 androgen-receptor–negative human prostate cancer xenografts in male nude rats.