Heterotrimeric G-protein subunit function in Candida albicans: both the alpha and beta subunits of the pheromone response G protein are required for mating

A pheromone-mediated signaling pathway that couples seven-transmembrane-domain (7-TMD) receptors to a mitogen-activated protein kinase module controls Candida albicans mating. 7-TMD receptors are typically connected to heterotrimeric G proteins whose activation regulates downstream effectors. Two Galpha subunits in C. albicans have been identified previously, both of which have been implicated in aspects of pheromone response. Cag1p was found to complement the mating pathway function of the pheromone receptor-coupled Galpha subunit in Saccharomyces cerevisiae, and Gpa2p was shown to have a role in the regulation of cyclic AMP signaling in C. albicans and to repress pheromone-mediated arrest. Here, we show that the disruption of CAG1 prevented mating, inactivated pheromone-mediated arrest and morphological changes, and blocked pheromone-mediated gene expression changes in opaque cells of C. albicans and that the overproduction of CAG1 suppressed the hyperactive cell cycle arrest exhibited by sst2 mutant cells. Because the disruption of the STE4 homolog constituting the only C. albicans gene for a heterotrimeric Gbeta subunit also blocked mating and pheromone response, it appears that in this fungal pathogen the Galpha and Gbeta subunits do not act antagonistically but, instead, are both required for the transmission of the mating signal.     

Phosphorylation of the pheromone-responsive Gβ protein of Saccharomyces cerevisiae does not affect its mating-specific signaling function

The pheromone-responsive G_β subunit of Saccharomyces cerevisiae (encoded by STE4) is rapidly phosphorylated at multiple sites when yeast cells are exposed to mating pheromone. It has been shown that a mutant form of Ste4 lacking residues 310–346, ste4Δ310–346, cannot be phosphorylated, and that its expression leads to defects in recovery from pheromone stimulation. Based on these observations, it was proposed that phosphorylation of Ste4 is associated with an adaptive response to mating pheromone. In this study we used site-directed mutagenesis to create two phosphorylation null (Pho^?) alleles of STE4: ste4-T320?A/S335A and ste4-T322 A/S335A and ste4-T322A/S335A. When expressed in yeast, these mutant forms of Ste4 remained unphosphorylated upon pheromone stimulation. The elimination of Ste4 phosphorylation has no discernible effect on either signaling or adaptation. In addition, disruption of the FUS3 gene, which encodes a pheromone-specific MAP kinase, leads to partial loss of pheromone-induced Ste4 phosphorylation. Two-hybrid analysis suggests that the ste4Δ310–346 deletion mutant is impaired in its interaction with Gpa1, the pheromone-responsive G_α of yeast, whereas the Ste4-T320A/S335A mutant has normal affinity for Gpa1. Taken together, these results indicate that pheromone-induced phosphorylation of Ste4 is not an adaptive mechanism, and that the adaptive defect exhibited by the 310–346 deletion mutant is likely to be due to disruption of the interaction between Ste4 and Gpa1.     

Scanning mutagenesis of regions in the Galpha protein Gpa1 that are predicted to interact with yeast mating pheromone receptors.

The mechanism by which receptors activate heterotrimeric G proteins was examined by scanning mutagenesis of the Saccharomyces cerevisiae pheromone-responsive Galpha protein (Gpa1). The juxtaposition of high-resolution structures for rhodopsin and its cognate G protein transducin predicted that at least six regions of Galpha are in close proximity to the receptor. Mutagenesis was targeted to residues in these domains in Gpa1, which included four loop regions (beta2-beta3, alpha2-beta4, alpha3-beta5, and alpha4-beta6) as well as the N and C termini. The mutants displayed a range of phenotypes from nonsignaling to constitutive activation of the pheromone pathway. The constitutive activity of some mutants could be explained by decreased production of Gpa1, which permits unregulated signaling by Gbetagamma. However, the constitutive activity caused by the F344C and E335C mutations in the alpha2-beta4 loop and F378C in the alpha3-beta5 loop was not due to decreased protein levels, and was apparently due to defects in sequestering Gbetagamma. The strongest loss of the function mutant, which was not detectably induced by a pheromone, was caused by a K314C substitution in the beta2-beta3 loop. Several other mutations caused weak signaling phenotypes. Altogether, these results suggest that residues in different interface regions of Galpha contribute to activation of signaling.     

Canonical heterotrimeric G proteins regulating mating and virulence of Cryptococcus neoformans

Perturbation of pheromone signaling modulates not only mating but also virulence in Cryptococcus neoformans, an opportunistic human pathogen known to encode three Galpha, one Gbeta, and two Ggamma subunit proteins. We have found that Galphas Gpa2 and Gpa3 exhibit shared and distinct roles in regulating pheromone responses and mating. Gpa2 interacted with the pheromone receptor homolog Ste3alpha, Gbeta subunit Gpb1, and RGS protein Crg1. Crg1 also exhibited in vitro GAP activity toward Gpa2. These findings suggest that Gpa2 regulates mating through a conserved signaling mechanism. Moreover, we found that Ggammas Gpg1 and Gpg2 both regulate pheromone responses and mating. gpg1 mutants were attenuated in mating, and gpg2 mutants were sterile. Finally, although gpa2, gpa3, gpg1, gpg2, and gpg1 gpg2 mutants were fully virulent, gpa2 gpa3 mutants were attenuated for virulence in a murine model. Our study reveals a conserved but distinct signaling mechanism by two Galpha, one Gbeta, and two Ggamma proteins for pheromone responses, mating, and virulence in Cryptococcus neoformans, and it also reiterates that the link between mating and virulence is not due to mating per se but rather to certain mating-pathway components that encode additional functions promoting virulence.     

Phosphorylation of the pheromone-responsive Gβ protein of Saccharomyces cerevisiae does not affect its mating-specific signaling function

The pheromone-responsive G_β subunit of Saccharomyces cerevisiae (encoded by STE4) is rapidly phosphorylated at multiple sites when yeast cells are exposed to mating pheromone. It has been shown that a mutant form of Ste4 lacking residues 310–346, ste4Δ310–346, cannot be phosphorylated, and that its expression leads to defects in recovery from pheromone stimulation. Based on these observations, it was proposed that phosphorylation of Ste4 is associated with an adaptive response to mating pheromone. In this study we used site-directed mutagenesis to create two phosphorylation null (Pho⁻) alleles of STE4: ste4-T320 A/S335A and ste4-T322 A/S335A and ste4-T322A/S335A. When expressed in yeast, these mutant forms of Ste4 remained unphosphorylated upon pheromone stimulation. The elimination of Ste4 phosphorylation has no discernible effect on either signaling or adaptation. In addition, disruption of the FUS3 gene, which encodes a pheromone-specific MAP kinase, leads to partial loss of pheromone-induced Ste4 phosphorylation. Two-hybrid analysis suggests that the ste4Δ310–346 deletion mutant is impaired in its interaction with Gpa1, the pheromone-responsive G_α of yeast, whereas the Ste4-T320A/S335A mutant has normal affinity for Gpa1. Taken together, these results indicate that pheromone-induced phosphorylation of Ste4 is not an adaptive mechanism, and that the adaptive defect exhibited by the 310–346 deletion mutant is likely to be due to disruption of the interaction between Ste4 and Gpa1. Received: 14 February 1998 / Accepted: 28 February 1998     

The mating-specific G(alpha) protein of Saccharomyces cerevisiae downregulates the mating signal by a mechanism that is dependent on pheromone and independent of G(beta)(gamma) sequestration.

It has been inferred from compelling genetic evidence that the pheromone-responsive G(alpha) protein of Saccharomyces cerevisiae, Gpa1, directly inhibits the mating signal by binding to its own beta(gamma) subunit. Gpa1 has also been implicated in a distinct but as yet uncharacterized negative regulatory mechanism. We have used three mutant alleles of GPA1, each of which confers resistance to otherwise lethal doses of pheromone, to explore this possibility. Our results indicate that although the G322E allele of GPA1 completely blocks the pheromone response, the E364K allele promotes recovery from pheromone treatment rather than insensitivity to it. This observation suggests that Gpa1, like other G(alpha) proteins, interacts with an effector molecule and stimulates a positive signal--in this case, an adaptive signal. Moreover, the Gpa1-mediated adaptive signal is itself induced by pheromone, is delayed relative to the mating signal, and does not involve sequestration of G(beta)(gamma). The behavior of N388D, a mutant form of Gpa1 predicted to be activated, strongly supports these conclusions. Although N388D cannot sequester beta(gamma), as evidenced by two-hybrid analysis and its inability to complement a Gpa1 null allele under normal growth conditions, it can stimulate adaptation and rescue a gpa1(delta) strain when cells are exposed to pheromone. Considered as a whole, our data suggest that the pheromone-responsive heterotrimeric G protein of S. cerevisiae has a self-regulatory signaling function. Upon activation, the heterotrimer dissociates into its two subunits, one of which stimulates the pheromone response, while the other slowly induces a negative regulatory mechanism that ultimately shuts off the mating signal downstream of the receptor.     

Genetic Relationships between the G Protein β_entitystart_#947_entit Complex, Ste5p, Ste20p and Cdc42p: Investigation of Effector Roles in the Yeast Pheromone Response Pathway

The Saccharomyces cerevisiae G protein βγ dimer, Ste4p/Ste18p, acts downstream of the α subunit, Gpa1p, to activate the pheromone response pathway and therefore must interact with a downstream effector. Synthetic sterile mutants that exacerbate the phenotype of ste4-ts mutations were isolated to identify proteins that functionally interact with Ste4p. The identification of a ste18 mutant indicated that this screen could identify proteins that interact directly with Ste4p. The other mutations were in STE5 and the STE20 kinase gene, which act near Ste4p in the pathway, and a new gene called STE21. ste20 null mutants showed residual mating, suggesting that another kinase may provide some function. Overexpression of Ste5p under galactose control activated the pheromone response pathway. This activation was dependent on Ste4p and Ste18p and partially dependent on Ste20p. These results cannot be explained by the linear pathway of Ste4p -> Ste20p -> Ste5p. Overexpression of Cdc42p resulted in a slight increase in pheromone induction of a reporter gene, and overexpression of activated forms of Cdc42p resulted in a further twofold increase. Mutations in pheromone response pathway components did not suppress the lethality associated with the activated CDC42 mutations, suggesting that this effect is independent of the pheromone response pathway.     

The yeast pheromone-responsive Gα protein stimulates recovery from chronic pheromone treatment by two mechanisms that are activated at distinct levels of stimulus

The pheromone response ofSaccharomyces cerevisiae is mediated by a receptor-coupled heterotrimeric G protein. The βγ subunit of the G protein stimulates a PAK/MAP kinase cascade that leads to cellular changes preparatory to mating, while the pheromone-responsive Gα protein, Gpa1, antagonizes the Gβγ-induced signal. In its inactive conformation, Gpa1 sequesters Gβγ and tethers it to the receptor. In its active conformation, Gpa1 stimulates adaptive mechanisms that downregulate the mating signal, but which are independent of α-βγ binding. To elucidate these potentially novel signaling functions of Gα in yeast, epistasis analyses were performed using N388D, a hyperadaptive mutant form of Gpa1, and null alleles of various loci that have been implicated in adaptation. The results of these experiments indicate the existence of signaling thresholds that affect the yeast mating reaction. At low pheromone concentration, the Regulator of G Protein Signaling (RGS) homologue and putative guanosine triphosphatase (GTPase) activating protein, Sst2, appears to stimulate sequestration of Gβγ by Gpa1. Throughout the range of pheromone concentrations sufficient to cause cell cycle arrest, Gpa1 stimulates adaptive mechanisms that are partially dependent on Msg5 and Mpt5. Gpa1-mediated adaptation appears to be independent of Afr1, Akr1, and the carboxy-terminus of the pheromone receptor.     

Genetic identification of residues involved in association of alpha and beta G-protein subunits.

The GPA1, STE4, and STE18 genes of Saccharomyces cerevisiae encode the alpha, beta, and gamma subunits, respectively, of a G protein involved in the mating response pathway. We have found that mutations G124D, W136G, W136R, and delta L138 and double mutations W136R L138F and W136G S151C of the Ste4 protein cause constitutive activation of the signaling pathway. The W136R L138F and W136G S151C mutant Ste4 proteins were tested in the two-hybrid protein association assay and found to be defective in association with the Gpa1 protein. A mutation at position E307 of the Gpa1 protein both suppresses the constitutive signaling phenotype of some mutant Ste4 proteins and allows the mutant alpha subunit to physically associate with a specific mutant G beta subunit. The mutation in the Gpa1 protein is adjacent to the hinge, or switch, region that is required for the conformational change which triggers subunit dissociation, but the mutation does not affect the interaction of the alpha subunit with the wild-type beta subunit. Yeast cells constructed to contain only the mutant alpha and beta subunits mate and respond to pheromones, although they exhibit partial induction of the pheromone response pathway. Because the ability of the modified G alpha subunit to suppress the Ste4 mutations is allele specific, it is likely that the residues defined by this analysis play a direct role in G-protein subunit association.     

Mapping of a yeast G protein betagamma signaling interaction.

The mating pathway of Saccharomyces cerevisiae is widely used as a model system for G protein-coupled receptor-mediated signal transduction. Following receptor activation by the binding of mating pheromones, G protein betagamma subunits transmit the signal to a MAP kinase cascade, which involves interaction of Gbeta (Ste4p) with the MAP kinase scaffold protein Ste5p. Here, we identify residues in Ste4p required for the interaction with Ste5p. These residues define a new signaling interface close to the Ste20p binding site within the Gbetagamma coiled-coil. Ste4p mutants defective in the Ste5p interaction interact efficiently with Gpa1p (Galpha) and Ste18p (Ggamma) but cannot function in signal transduction because cells expressing these mutants are sterile. Ste4 L65S is temperature-sensitive for its interaction with Ste5p, and also for signaling. We have identified a Ste5p mutant (L196A) that displays a synthetic interaction defect with Ste4 L65S, providing strong evidence that Ste4p and Ste5p interact directly in vivo through an interface that involves hydrophobic residues. The correlation between disruption of the Ste4p-Ste5p interaction and sterility confirms the importance of this interaction in signal transduction. Identification of the Gbetagamma coiled-coil in Ste5p binding may set a precedent for Gbetagamma-effector interactions in more complex organisms.     

The Leu-132 of the Ste4(Gbeta) subunit is essential for proper coupling of the G protein with the Ste2 alpha factor receptor during the mating pheromone response in yeast

In order to identify amino acid residues of Ste4p involved in receptor recognition and/or receptor-G protein coupling, we employed random in vitro mutagenesis and a genetic screening to isolate mutant Ste4p subunits with altered pheromone response. We generated a plasmid library containing randomly mutagenized Ste4 ORFs, followed by phenotypic selection of ste4p mutants by altered alpha pheromone response in yeast cells. Subsequently, we analyzed mutant ste4-10 which has a replacement of the almost universally conserved leucine 132 by phenylalanine. This residue lies in the first blade of the beta propeller structure proposed by crystallographic analysis. By overexpression experiments we found that mutant ste4p subunit triggers the mating pathway at wild type levels in both wild type and receptorless strains. When expressed in a ste4 background, however, the mutant G protein is activated inefficiently by mating pheromone in both a and alpha cells. The mutant ste4-10p was tested in the two-hybrid system and found to be defective in its interaction with the Gpa1p, but has a normal association with the C-termini end of the Ste2p receptor. These observations strongly suggest that the Leu-132 of the Ste4p subunit is essential for efficient activation of the G protein by the pheromone-stimulated receptor and that this domain could be an important point for physical interaction between the Gbeta and the Galpha subunits.     

Analysis of the receptor binding domain of Gpa1p, the G(alpha) subunit involved in the yeast pheromone response pathway.

The Saccharomyces cerevisiae G protein alpha subunit Gpa1p is involved in the response of both MATa and MAT alpha cells to pheromone. We mutagenized the GPA1 C terminus to characterize the receptor-interacting domain and to investigate the specificity of the interactions with the a- and alpha-factor receptors. The results are discussed with respect to a structural model of the Gpa1p C terminus that was based on the crystal structure of bovine transducin. Some mutants showed phenotypes different than the pheromone response and mating defects expected for mutations that affect receptor interactions, and therefore the mutations may affect other aspects of Gpa1p function. Most of the mutations that resulted in pheromone response and mating defects had similar effects in MATa and MAT alpha cells, suggesting that they affect the interactions with both receptors. Overexpression of the pheromone receptors increased the mating of some of the mutants tested but not the wild-type strain, consistent with defects in mutant Gpa1p-receptor interactions. The regions identified by the mating-defective mutants correlated well with the regions of mammalian G(alpha) subunits implicated in receptor interactions. The strongest mating type-specific effects were seen for mutations to proline and a mutation of a glycine residue predicted to form a C-terminal beta turn. The analogous beta turn in mammalian G(alpha) subunits undergoes a conformational change upon receptor interaction. We propose that the conformation of this region of Gpa1p differs during the interactions with the a- and alpha-factor receptors and that these mating type-specific mutations preclude the orientation necessary for interaction with one of the two receptors.     

Regulation of postreceptor signaling in the pheromone response pathway of Saccharomyces cerevisiae.

alpha-Factor pheromone inhibits division of yeast a cells. After prolonged exposure to alpha-factor, the cells adapt to the stimulus and resume cell division. The sst2 mutation is known to inhibit adaptation. This report examines adaptation in scg1 (also designated gpa1) and STE4Hpl (Hpl indicates haploid lethal) mutants that exhibit constitutive activation of the pheromone response pathway. Recovery of the STE4Hpl mutant was blocked by the sst2-1 mutation, whereas recovery of the scg1-7 mutant was not completely blocked by sst2-1. These results indicate that both SST2-dependent and -independent mechanisms regulate postreceptor events in the pheromone response pathway. Down regulation of receptors in response to alpha-factor was independent of the signal that was generated in the scg1 mutant.     

Scanning mutagenesis of regions in the Gα protein Gpa1 that are predicted to interact with yeast mating pheromone receptors

The mechanism by which receptors activate heterotrimeric G proteins was examined by scanning mutagenesis of the Saccharomyces cerevisiae pheromone-responsive Gα protein (Gpa1). The juxtaposition of high-resolution structures for rhodopsin and its cognate G protein transducin predicted that at least six regions of Gα are in close proximity to the receptor. Mutagenesis was targeted to residues in these domains in Gpa1, which included four loop regions (β2–β3, α2–β4, α3–β5, and α4–β6) as well as the N and C termini. The mutants displayed a range of phenotypes from nonsignaling to constitutive activation of the pheromone pathway. The constitutive activity of some mutants could be explained by decreased production of Gpa1, which permits unregulated signaling by Gβγ. However, the constitutive activity caused by the F344C and E335C mutations in the α2–β4 loop and F378C in the α3–β5 loop was not due to decreased protein levels, and was apparently due to defects in sequestering Gβγ. The strongest loss of the function mutant, which was not detectably induced by a pheromone, was caused by a K314C substitution in the β2–β3 loop. Several other mutations caused weak signaling phenotypes. Altogether, these results suggest that residues in different interface regions of Gα contribute to activation of signaling.     

G protein signaling governing cell fate decisions involves opposing Galpha subunits in Cryptococcus neoformans

Communication between cells and their environments is often mediated by G protein-coupled receptors and cognate G proteins. In fungi, one such signaling cascade is the mating pathway triggered by pheromone/pheromone receptor recognition. Unlike Saccharomyces cerevisiae, which expresses two Galpha subunits, most filamentous ascomycetes and basidiomycetes have three Galpha subunits. Previous studies have defined the Galpha subunit acting upstream of the cAMP-protein kinase A pathway, but it has been unclear which Galpha subunit is coupled to the pheromone receptor and response pathway. Here we report that in the pathogenic basidiomycetous yeast Cryptococcus neoformans, two Galpha subunits (Gpa2, Gpa3) sense pheromone and govern mating. gpa2 gpa3 double mutants, but neither gpa2 nor gpa3 single mutants, are sterile in bilateral crosses. By contrast, deletion of GPA3 (but not GPA2) constitutively activates pheromone response and filamentation. Expression of GPA2 and GPA3 is differentially regulated: GPA3 expression is induced by nutrient-limitation, whereas GPA2 is induced during mating. Based on the phenotype of dominant active alleles, Gpa2 and Gpa3 signal in opposition: Gpa2 promotes mating, whereas Gpa3 inhibits. The incorporation of an additional Galpha into the regulatory circuit enabled increased signaling complexity and facilitated cell fate decisions involving choice between yeast growth and filamentous asexual/sexual development.     

Distinct roles for two Galpha-Gbeta interfaces in cell polarity control by a yeast heterotrimeric G protein

Saccharomyces cerevisiae mating pheromones trigger dissociation of a heterotrimeric G protein (Galphabetagamma) into Galpha-guanosine triphosphate (GTP) and Gbetagamma. The Gbetagamma dimer regulates both mitogen-activated protein (MAP) kinase cascade signaling and cell polarization. Here, by independently activating the MAP kinase pathway, we studied the polarity role of Gbetagamma in isolation from its signaling role. MAP kinase signaling alone could induce cell asymmetry but not directional growth. Surprisingly, active Gbetagamma, either alone or with Galpha-GTP, could not organize a persistent polarization axis. Instead, following pheromone gradients (chemotropism) or directional growth without pheromone gradients (de novo polarization) required an intact receptor-Galphabetagamma module and GTP hydrolysis by Galpha. Our results indicate that chemoattractant-induced cell polarization requires continuous receptor-Galphabetagamma communication but not modulation of MAP kinase signaling. To explore regulation of Gbetagamma by Galpha, we mutated Gbeta residues in two structurally distinct Galpha-Gbeta binding interfaces. Polarity control was disrupted only by mutations in the N-terminal interface, and not the Switch interface. Incorporation of these mutations into a Gbeta-Galpha fusion protein, which enforces subunit proximity, revealed that Switch interface dissociation regulates signaling, whereas the N-terminal interface may govern receptor-Galphabetagamma coupling. These findings raise the possibility that the Galphabetagamma heterotrimer can function in a partially dissociated state, tethered by the N-terminal interface.     

Point mutations identify a conserved region of the saccharomyces cerevisiae AFR1 gene that is essential for both the pheromone signaling and morphogenesis functions

Mating pheromone receptors activate a G protein signal pathway that leads to the conjugation of the yeast Saccharomyces cerevisiae. This pathway also induces the production of Afr1p, a protein that negatively regulates pheromone receptor signaling and is required to form pointed projections of new growth that become the site of cell fusion during mating. Afr1p lacks strong similarity to any well-characterized proteins to help predict how it acts. Therefore, we investigated the relationship between the different functions of Afr1p by isolating and characterizing seven mutants that were defective in regulating pheromone signaling. The AFR1 mutants were also defective when expressed as fusions to STE2, the alpha-factor receptor, indicating that the mutant Afr1 proteins are defective in function and not in co-localizing with receptors. The mutant genes contained four distinct point mutations that all occurred between codons 254 and 263, identifying a region that is critical for AFR1 function. Consistent with this, we found that the corresponding region is very highly conserved in the Afr1p homologs from the yeasts S. uvarum and S. douglasii. In contrast, there were no detectable effects on pheromone signaling caused by deletion or overexpression of YER158c, an open reading frame with overall sequence similarity to Afr1p that lacks this essential region. Interestingly, all of the AFR1 mutants showed a defect in their ability to form mating projections that was proportional to their defect in regulating pheromone signaling. This suggests that both functions may be due to the same action of Afr1p. Thus, these studies identify a specific region of Afr1p that is critical for its function in both signaling and morphogenesis.     

Genetic fine-structural analysis of the Saccharomyces cerevisiae alpha-pheromone receptor.

The alpha-pheromone receptor encoded by the STE2 gene contains seven potential transmembrane domains. Its ability to transduce the pheromone signal is thought to require the action of a G protein. As an initial step toward defining the structural features of the receptor required for its activity, we examined the phenotypic consequences of linker insertion mutations (12 bp) at 10 different sites in the STE2 gene. Three mutant classes, which correspond to three different regions of the receptor protein, were observed. 1) The two mutants affecting the C-terminal region (C-terminal mutants) were essentially wild type for mating efficiency, pheromone binding, and pheromone sensitivity. 2) The three mutants in the N-terminus mated with reduced efficiency, showed reduced pheromone binding capacity, and were partially defective in pheromone induction of agglutinin production and cell division arrest. Increased gene dosage of these N-terminal alleles suppressed their mutant phenotypes, whereas the sst2-1 mutation, which blocks adaptation to pheromone, did not result in suppression. Thus, the N-terminal mutants were apparently limited by receptor production, but not by the adaptation function SST2. 3) The five mutants in the central region containing the seven transmembrane segments (central mutants) were completely defective for mating and did not respond to pheromone, but could be distinguished by their ability to bind pheromone. Inserts in or near transmembrane domains 2 and 4 blocked pheromone binding, whereas inserts into transmembrane domains 1, 5, and 6 retained partial pheromone binding activity even though they failed to transduce a signal. The central mutants were not suppressed by increased gene dosage, and one mutant (ste2-/101) was partially suppressed by sst2-1. Furthermore, the central core mutants were also distinguished from one another in that three of the five mutants were able to partially complement the temperature sensitivity of ste2-3.     

Constitutive mutants in the yeast pheromone response: ordered function of the gene products

The alpha factor pheromone inhibits the division of yeast a cells. A general method was developed for isolating mutants that exhibit constitutive activation of the pheromone response pathway. A dominant allele of the STE4 locus was recovered in addition to recessive mutations in the SCG1 gene. SCG1 and STE4 are known to encode G alpha and G beta homologs, respectively. Analysis of double mutants suggests that the STE4 gene product functions after the SCG1 product but before the STE5 product.