Genetic factors required to maintain repression of a paramutagenic maize pl1 allele

A genetic screen identified two novel gene functions required to maintain mitotically and meiotically heritable gene silencing associated with paramutation of the maize purple plant 1 (pl1) locus. Paramutation at pl1 leads to heritable alterations of pl1 gene regulation; the Pl-Rhoades (Pl-Rh) allele, which typically confers strong pigmentation to juvenile and adult plant structures, changes to a lower expression state termed Pl'-mahogany (Pl'). Paramutation spontaneously occurs at low frequencies in Pl-Rh homozygotes but always occurs when Pl-Rh is heterozygous with Pl'. We identified four mutations that caused increased Pl' pigment levels. Allelism tests revealed that three mutations identified two new maize loci, required to maintain repression 1 (rmr1) and rmr2 and that the other mutation represents a new allele of the previously described mediator of paramutation 1 (mop1) locus. RNA levels from Pl' are elevated in rmr mutants and genetic tests demonstrate that Pl' can heritably change back to Pl-Rh in rmr mutant individuals at variable frequencies. Pigment levels controlled by two pl1 alleles that do not participate in paramutation are unaffected in rmr mutants. These results suggest that RMR functions are intimately involved in maintaining the repressed expression state of paramutant Pl' alleles. Despite strong effects on Pl' repression, rmr mutant plants have no gross developmental abnormalities even after several generations of inbreeding, implying that RMR1 and RMR2 functions are not generally required for developmental homeostasis.     

Not too much and not too little

We tend to think in black and white terms of good versus bad alleles and their meaning for disease. However, in doing so, we ignore the potential importance of heterozygous alleles.The structure and function of any protein is determined by its amino acid sequence. Thus, the substitution of one amino acid for another can alter the activity of a protein or its function. Mutations—or rather, polymorphism, once they become fixed in the population—can be deleterious, such that the altered protein is no longer able to fulfil its role with potentially devastating effects on the cell. Rarely, they can improve protein function and cell performance. In either case, any changes in the amino acid sequence, whether they affect only one amino acid or larger parts of the protein, are encoded by polymorphisms in the nucleotide sequence of that protein''s gene. For any given polymorphism, diploid organisms with two sets of chromosomes can therefore exist in either a heterozygous state or one of two homozygous states. When the polymorphism is rare, most individuals are homozygous for the ‘wild-type'' state, some individuals are heterozygous and a few are homozygous for the rare polymorphic variant. Conversely, if the polymorphism occurs in 50% of the alleles, the heterozygous state is common.At first glance, the deleterious homozygous state seems to be something that organisms try to avoid: close relatives usually do not breed, probably to prevent the homozygous accumulation of deleterious alleles. Thus, human cultural norms, founded in our biology, actively select for heterozygosity as many civilizations and societies regard incest as a social taboo. The fields of animal husbandry and conservation biology are littered with information about the significant positive correlation between genetic diversity, evolutionary advantage and fitness [1]. In sexually reproducing organisms, heterozygosity is generally regarded as ‘better'' in terms of adaptability and evolutionary advantage.Why then do we seldom, if ever, regard allelic heterozygosity as an advantage when it comes to genes linked with health and disease? Perhaps it is because we tend to distinguish between the ‘good'' allele, the ‘bad'' allele and the ‘ugly'' heterozygote—since it is burdened with one ‘bad'' allele. Maybe this attitude is a remnant of the outdated ‘one gene, one disease'' model, or of the early studies on inheritable diseases that focused on monogenic or autosomal-dominant genetic disorders. Even modern genetics almost always assigns ‘risk'' to an allele that is associated with a health condition or disadvantaged phenotype; clearly, then, the one homozygous state must have an advantage—sometimes referred to as wild-type—but the heterozygote is often ignored altogether.Maybe we also shun heterozygosity because it is hard to prove, beyond a few examples, that it might offer advantage. A 2010 paper published in Cell claimed that heterozygosity of the lth4A locus conveys protection against tuberculosis [2]. There is a mechanistic basis for the claim: lth4A encodes leukotriene A4 hydrolase, which is the final catalyst to synthesize leukotriene B4, an efficient pro-inflammatory eicosanoid. However, an extensive case–control study could not confirm the association between heterozygosity and protection against tuberculosis [3]. Therefore, many in the field dismiss the prior claim to protection conferred by the heterozygous state.Yet, we know that most biochemical and physiological processes are highly complex systems that involve multiple, interlinked steps with extensive control and feedback mechanisms. Heterozygosity might be one strategy by which an organism maintains flexibility, as it provides more than one allele to fall back on, should conditions change. We may therefore hypothesize that heterozygosity can be either a risk or an advantage, depending on the penetrance or dominance of the alleles. Indeed, there are a few cases in which heterozygosity confers some advantage. For example, individuals who are homozygous for the CCR5 deletion polymorphism (D32/D32) are protected against HIV1 infection, whereas CCR5/D32 heterozygotes have a slower progression to acquired immunodeficiency syndrome (AIDS). In sickle-cell anaemia, heterozygotes have a protective advantage against malaria, whereas the homozygotes either lack protection or suffer health consequences. Thus, although heterozygosity might not create a general fitness advantage, it is advantageous under certain specific conditions, namely the presence of the malaria parasite.In most aspects of life, there are few absolutes and many shades of grey. The ‘normal'' range of parameters in medicine is a clear example of this: optimal functioning of the relevant physiological processes depends on levels that are ‘just right''. As molecular and genetic research tackles the causes and risk factors of complex diseases, we may perhaps find more examples of how heterozygosity at the genetic level conveys health advantages in humans. As the above example regarding tuberculosis indicates, it is difficult to demonstrate any advantage of the heterozygous state. We simply need to be receptive to such possibilities, and improve and reconcile our understanding of allelic diversity and heterozygosity. Researchers working on human disease could benefit from the insights of evolutionary biologists and breeders, who are more appreciative of the heterozygous state.     

Expression Differentiation Is Constrained to Low-Expression Proteins over Ecological Timescales

Protein expression level is one of the strongest predictors of protein sequence evolutionary rate, with high-expression protein sequences evolving at slower rates than low-expression protein sequences largely because of constraints on protein folding and function. Expression evolutionary rates also have been shown to be negatively correlated with expression level across human and mouse orthologs over relatively long divergence times (i.e., ∼100 million years). Long-term evolutionary patterns, however, often cannot be extrapolated to microevolutionary processes (and vice versa), and whether this relationship holds for traits evolving under directional selection within a single species over ecological timescales (i.e., <5000 years) is unknown and not necessarily expected. Expression is a metabolically costly process, and the expression level of a particular protein is predicted to be a tradeoff between the benefit of its function and the costs of its expression. Selection should drive the expression level of all proteins close to values that maximize fitness, particularly for high-expression proteins because of the increased energetic cost of production. Therefore, stabilizing selection may reduce the amount of standing expression variation for high-expression proteins, and in combination with physiological constraints that may place an upper bound on the range of beneficial expression variation, these constraints could severely limit the availability of beneficial expression variants. To determine whether rapid-expression evolution was restricted to low-expression proteins owing to these constraints on highly expressed proteins over ecological timescales, we compared venom protein expression levels across mainland and island populations for three species of pit vipers. We detected significant differentiation in protein expression levels in two of the three species and found that rapid-expression differentiation was restricted to low-expression proteins. Our results suggest that various constraints on high-expression proteins reduce the availability of beneficial expression variants relative to low-expression proteins, enabling low-expression proteins to evolve and potentially lead to more rapid adaptation.     

Allelic Richness following Population Founding Events – A Stochastic Modeling Framework Incorporating Gene Flow and Genetic Drift

Allelic richness (number of alleles) is a measure of genetic diversity indicative of a population''s long-term potential for adaptability and persistence. It is used less commonly than heterozygosity as a genetic diversity measure, partially because it is more mathematically difficult to take into account the stochastic process of genetic drift for allelic richness. This paper presents a stochastic model for the allelic richness of a newly founded population experiencing genetic drift and gene flow. The model follows the dynamics of alleles lost during the founder event and simulates the effect of gene flow on maintenance and recovery of allelic richness. The probability of an allele''s presence in the population was identified as the relevant statistical property for a meaningful interpretation of allelic richness. A method is discussed that combines the probability of allele presence with a population''s allele frequency spectrum to provide predictions for allele recovery. The model''s analysis provides insights into the dynamics of allelic richness following a founder event, taking into account gene flow and the allele frequency spectrum. Furthermore, the model indicates that the “One Migrant per Generation” rule, a commonly used conservation guideline related to heterozygosity, may be inadequate for addressing preservation of diversity at the allelic level. This highlights the importance of distinguishing between heterozygosity and allelic richness as measures of genetic diversity, since focusing merely on the preservation of heterozygosity might not be enough to adequately preserve allelic richness, which is crucial for species persistence and evolution.     

An inclusive fitness analysis of synergistic interactions in structured populations

We study the evolution of a pair of competing behavioural alleles in a structured population when there are non-additive or ‘synergistic’ fitness effects. Under a form of weak selection and with a simple symmetry condition between a pair of competing alleles, Tarnita et al. provide a surprisingly simple condition for one allele to dominate the other. Their condition can be obtained from an analysis of a corresponding simpler model in which fitness effects are additive. Their result uses an average measure of selective advantage where the average is taken over the long-term—that is, over all possible allele frequencies—and this precludes consideration of any frequency dependence the allelic fitness might exhibit. However, in a considerable body of work with non-additive fitness effects—for example, hawk–dove and prisoner''s dilemma games—frequency dependence plays an essential role in the establishment of conditions for a stable allele-frequency equilibrium. Here, we present a frequency-dependent generalization of their result that provides an expression for allelic fitness at any given allele frequency p. We use an inclusive fitness approach and provide two examples for an infinite structured population. We illustrate our results with an analysis of the hawk–dove game.     

Gene interactions in the evolution of genomic imprinting

Numerous evolutionary theories have been developed to explain the epigenetic phenomenon of genomic imprinting. Here, we explore a subset of theories wherein non-additive genetic interactions can favour imprinting. In the simplest genic interaction—the case of underdominance—imprinting can be favoured to hide effectively low-fitness heterozygous genotypes; however, as there is no asymmetry between maternally and paternally inherited alleles in this model, other means of enforcing monoallelic expression may be more plausible evolutionary outcomes than genomic imprinting. By contrast, more successful interaction models of imprinting rely on an asymmetry between the maternally and paternally inherited alleles at a locus that favours the silencing of one allele as a means of coordinating the expression of high-fitness allelic combinations. For example, with interactions between autosomal loci, imprinting functionally preserves high-fitness genotypes that were favoured by selection in the previous generation. In this scenario, once a focal locus becomes imprinted, selection at interacting loci favours a matching imprint. Uniparental transmission generates similar asymmetries for sex chromosomes and cytoplasmic factors interacting with autosomal loci, with selection favouring the expression of either maternal or paternally derived autosomal alleles depending on the pattern of transmission of the uniparentally inherited factor. In a final class of models, asymmetries arise when genes expressed in offspring interact with genes expressed in one of its parents. Under such a scenario, a locus evolves to have imprinted expression in offspring to coordinate the interaction with its parent''s genome. We illustrate these models and explore key links and differences using a unified framework.     

Genotype of an individual single nucleotide polymorphism regulates DNA methylation at the TRPC3 alternative promoter

A fundamental challenge in the post-genomics era is to understand how genetic variants can influence phenotypic variability and disease. Recent observations from a number of studies have highlighted a mechanism by which common genetic polymorphisms can influence DNA methylation, a major epigenetic silencing mechanism. We report that the alternative promoter of the human TRPC3 gene is regulated by allelic DNA methylation, dictated by the genotype of a single base pair polymorphism, rs13121031 located within the promoter CpG island. The common G allele is associated with high levels of methylation, while the less prevalent C allele is unmethylated. This methylation profile is observed in many tissue types, despite the expression of TRPC3 being restricted to brain and heart. TRPC3 is prominently expressed in the hindbrain, and a heterozygous brain sample showed modest skewing according to the allelic methylation, with preferential expression from the C allele. The TRPC3 gene encodes a transient receptor potential channel that has been implicated in cerebellar ataxia and heart hypertrophy. The genotype-frequencies of rs13121031 were determined in cohorts of ataxia patients and in individuals with cardiac hypertrophy. These analyses revealed a statistical trend for the rare unmethylated homozygous C genotype to be present at a higher frequency in idiopathic ataxia patients (Fisher's test p=0.06), but not in those patients with known mutations (Fisher's test p=0.55) or in individuals with heart disease (Fisher's test p=0.807), when compared to a control population. Our results suggest that the TRPC3 alternative promoter is a methylation quantitative-trait locus that may be involved in modulating the ataxia phenotype.     

Multimer Formation Explains Allelic Suppression of PRDM9 Recombination Hotspots

Genetic recombination during meiosis functions to increase genetic diversity, promotes elimination of deleterious alleles, and helps assure proper segregation of chromatids. Mammalian recombination events are concentrated at specialized sites, termed hotspots, whose locations are determined by PRDM9, a zinc finger DNA-binding histone methyltransferase. Prdm9 is highly polymorphic with most alleles activating their own set of hotspots. In populations exhibiting high frequencies of heterozygosity, questions remain about the influences different alleles have in heterozygous individuals where the two variant forms of PRDM9 typically do not activate equivalent populations of hotspots. We now find that, in addition to activating its own hotspots, the presence of one Prdm9 allele can modify the activity of hotspots activated by the other allele. PRDM9 function is also dosage sensitive; Prdm9 ^+/- heterozygous null mice have reduced numbers and less active hotspots and increased numbers of aberrant germ cells. In mice carrying two Prdm9 alleles, there is allelic competition; the stronger Prdm9 allele can partially or entirely suppress chromatin modification and recombination at hotspots of the weaker allele. In cell cultures, PRDM9 protein variants form functional heteromeric complexes which can bind hotspots sequences. When a heteromeric complex binds at a hotspot of one PRDM9 variant, the other PRDM9 variant, which would otherwise not bind, can still methylate hotspot nucleosomes. We propose that in heterozygous individuals the underlying molecular mechanism of allelic suppression results from formation of PRDM9 heteromers, where the DNA binding activity of one protein variant dominantly directs recombination initiation towards its own hotspots, effectively titrating down recombination by the other protein variant. In natural populations with many heterozygous individuals, allelic competition will influence the recombination landscape.     

Modulation of penetrance by the wild-type allele in dominantly inherited erythropoietic protoporphyria and acute hepatic porphyrias

We have recently demonstrated that in an autosomal dominant porphyria, erythropoietic protoporphyria (EPP), the coinheritance of a ferrochelatase (FECH) gene defect and of a wild-type low-expressed FECH allele is generally involved in the clinical expression of EPP. This mechanism may provide a model for phenotype modulation by minor variations in the expression of the wild-type allele in the other three autosomal dominant porphyrias that exhibit incomplete penetrance: acute intermittent porphyria (AIP), variegata porphyria (VP) and hereditary coproporphyria (HC), which are caused by partial deficiencies of hydroxy-methyl bilane synthase (HMBS), protoporphyrinogen oxidase (PPOX) and coproporphyrinogen oxidase (CPO), respectively. Given the dominant mode of inheritance of EPP, VP, AIP and HC, we first confirmed that the 200 overtly porphyric subjects (55 EPP, 58 AIP, 56 VP; 31 HC) presented a single mutation restricted to one allele (20 novel mutations and 162 known mutations). We then analysed the available single-nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs) present at high frequencies in the general population and spreading throughout the FECH, HMBS, PPOX and the CPO genes in four case-control association studies. Finally, we explored the functional consequences of polymorphisms on the abundance of wild-type RNA, and used relative allelic mRNA determinations to find out whether low-expressed HMBS, PPOX and the CPO alleles occur in the general population. We confirm that the wild-type low-expressed allele phenomenon is usually operative in the mechanism of variable penetrance in EPP, but conclude that this is not the case in AIP and VP. For HC, the CPO mRNA determinations strongly suggest that normal CPO alleles with low-expression are present, but whether this low-expression of the wild-type allele could modulate the penetrance of a CPO gene defect in HC families remains to be ascertained.     

Differential allelic expression of the type II collagen gene (COL2A1) in osteoarthritic cartilage.

Osteoarthritis (OA) is a common debilitating disease resulting from the degeneration of articular cartilage. The major protein of cartilage is type II collagen, which is encoded by the COL2A1 gene. Mutations at this locus have been discovered in several individuals with inherited disorders of cartilage. We have identified 27 primary OA patients who are heterozygous for sequence dimorphisms located in the coding region of COL2A1. These dimorphisms were used to distinguish the mRNA output from each of the two COL2A1 alleles in articular cartilage obtained from each patient. Three patients demonstrated differential allelic expression and produced < 12% of the normal level of mRNA from one of their COL2A1 alleles. The same allele shows reduced expression in all three patients, and this allele is more frequent in a well-defined OA population than in a control group, suggesting the possible existence of a rare COL2A1 allele that predisposes to OA.     

Frequency and characterization of phenotypic Ig heavy chain allelically included IgM-expressing B cells in mice

Ig H chain (IgH) allelic exclusion remains a puzzling topic. Here, we address the following question: Do phenotypic IgH allelically included cells exist in normal mice and, if so, at what frequency? Sorted cells from heterozygous mice were evaluated for the expression of both IgM allotypes by double intracytoplasmic stainings. Dual expressors were found at a frequency of 1 in 104 splenic B cells. These data were confirmed by direct sequencing of IgH-rearranged alleles obtained after single cell (or clone) PCR on dual expressors. Typically, these cells have one rearranged J558 VH whereas, in the other allele, a D-proximal VH gene is used. Interestingly, dual expressors have rearranged IgH alleles with similar CDR3 lengths. These results show that, in contrast to the kappa L chain and the TCR beta-chain, IgH allelic exclusion is the result of an extremely stringent mechanism. We discuss two non-mutually exclusive scenarios for the origin of IgH dual expressors: 1) IgH allelically included cells arise when the first allele to rearrange productively is unable to form a pre-BCR; dual expressors could be a subset of this population in which, upon conventional L chain rearrangement, both IgH are expressed at the surface; and 2) synchronous rearrangement of the IgH alleles.     

Detection of allelic variations of human gene expression by polymerase colonies

Background  

Quantification of variations of human gene expression is complicated by the small differences between different alleles. Recent work has shown that variations do exist in the relative allelic expression levels in certain genes of heterozygous individuals. Herein, we describe the application of an immobilized polymerase chain reaction technique as an alternative approach to measure relative allelic differential expression.