Development and validation of sandwich ELISA microarrays with minimal assay interference

Sandwich enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA) microarrays are emerging as a strong candidate platform for multiplex biomarker analysis because of the ELISA's ability to quantitatively measure rare proteins in complex biological fluids. Advantages of this platform are high-throughput potential, assay sensitivity and stringency, and the similarity to the standard ELISA test, which facilitates assay transfer from a research setting to a clinical laboratory. However, a major concern with the multiplexing of ELISAs is maintaining high assay specificity. In this study, we systematically determine the amount of assay interference and noise contributed by individual components of a multiplexed 24-assay system. We find that nonspecific reagent cross-reactivity problems are relatively rare. We did identify the presence of contaminant antigens in a "purified antigen". We tested the validated ELISA microarray chip using paired serum samples that had been collected from four women at a 6-month interval. This analysis demonstrated that protein levels typically vary much more between individuals than within an individual over time, a result which suggests that longitudinal studies may be useful in controlling for biomarker variability across a population. Overall, this research demonstrates the importance of a stringent screening protocol and the value of optimizing the antibody and antigen concentrations when designing chips for ELISA microarrays.     

Computational Biomarker Pipeline from Discovery to Clinical Implementation: Plasma Proteomic Biomarkers for Cardiac Transplantation

Recent technical advances in the field of quantitative proteomics have stimulated a large number of biomarker discovery studies of various diseases, providing avenues for new treatments and diagnostics. However, inherent challenges have limited the successful translation of candidate biomarkers into clinical use, thus highlighting the need for a robust analytical methodology to transition from biomarker discovery to clinical implementation. We have developed an end-to-end computational proteomic pipeline for biomarkers studies. At the discovery stage, the pipeline emphasizes different aspects of experimental design, appropriate statistical methodologies, and quality assessment of results. At the validation stage, the pipeline focuses on the migration of the results to a platform appropriate for external validation, and the development of a classifier score based on corroborated protein biomarkers. At the last stage towards clinical implementation, the main aims are to develop and validate an assay suitable for clinical deployment, and to calibrate the biomarker classifier using the developed assay. The proposed pipeline was applied to a biomarker study in cardiac transplantation aimed at developing a minimally invasive clinical test to monitor acute rejection. Starting with an untargeted screening of the human plasma proteome, five candidate biomarker proteins were identified. Rejection-regulated proteins reflect cellular and humoral immune responses, acute phase inflammatory pathways, and lipid metabolism biological processes. A multiplex multiple reaction monitoring mass-spectrometry (MRM-MS) assay was developed for the five candidate biomarkers and validated by enzyme-linked immune-sorbent (ELISA) and immunonephelometric assays (INA). A classifier score based on corroborated proteins demonstrated that the developed MRM-MS assay provides an appropriate methodology for an external validation, which is still in progress. Plasma proteomic biomarkers of acute cardiac rejection may offer a relevant post-transplant monitoring tool to effectively guide clinical care. The proposed computational pipeline is highly applicable to a wide range of biomarker proteomic studies.     

Quantitative proteomics analysis reveals that proteins differentially expressed in chronic pancreatitis are also frequently involved in pancreatic cancer

The effective treatment of pancreatic cancer relies on the diagnosis of the disease at an early stage, a difficult challenge. One major obstacle in the development of diagnostic biomarkers of early pancreatic cancer has been the dual expression of potential biomarkers in both chronic pancreatitis and cancer. To better understand the limitations of potential protein biomarkers, we used ICAT technology and tandem mass spectrometry-based proteomics to systematically study protein expression in chronic pancreatitis. Among the 116 differentially expressed proteins identified in chronic pancreatitis, most biological processes were responses to wounding and inflammation, a finding consistent with the underlining inflammation and tissue repair associated with chronic pancreatitis. Furthermore 40% of the differentially expressed proteins identified in chronic pancreatitis have been implicated previously in pancreatic cancer, suggesting some commonality in protein expression between these two diseases. Biological network analysis further identified c-MYC as a common prominent regulatory protein in pancreatic cancer and chronic pancreatitis. Lastly five proteins were selected for validation by Western blot and immunohistochemistry. Annexin A2 and insulin-like growth factor-binding protein 2 were overexpressed in cancer but not in chronic pancreatitis, making them promising biomarker candidates for pancreatic cancer. In addition, our study validated that cathepsin D, integrin beta1, and plasminogen were overexpressed in both pancreatic cancer and chronic pancreatitis. The positive involvement of these proteins in chronic pancreatitis and pancreatic cancer will potentially lower the specificity of these proteins as biomarker candidates for pancreatic cancer. Altogether our study provides some insights into the molecular events in chronic pancreatitis that may lead to diverse strategies for diagnosis and treatment of these diseases.     

Piezoelectric printing and probing of Lectin NanoProbeArrays for glycosylation analysis

Glycans have great potential as disease biomarkers and therapeutic targets. However, the major challenge for glycan biomarker identification from clinical samples is the low abundance of key glycosylated proteins. To demonstrate the potential for glycan analysis with nanoliter amounts of glycoprotein, we have developed a new technology (Lectin NanoProbeArray) based on piezoelectric liquid dispensing for non-contact printing and probing of a lectin array. Instead of flooding the glycoprotein probe on the lectin array surface, as in conventional microarray screening, a piezoelectric printer is used to dispense nanoliters of fluorescently labeled glycoprotein probe over the lectin spots on the array. As a proof-of-concept, the ability of Lectin NanoProbeArrays to precisely identify and reliably distinguish between the closely related glycoforms of fetuin is illustrated here. Sensitivity levels comparable to lectin arrays that use evanescent-field scanners was achieved along with several orders of magnitude reduction in the amount of probe required for glycosylation analysis.     

Elevated HGF levels in sera from breast cancer patients detected using a protein microarray ELISA

We developed an ELISA in high-density microarray format to detect hepatocyte growth factor (HGF) in human serum. The microassay can detect HGF at sub-pg/mL concentrations in sample volumes of 100 microL or less. The microassay is also quantitative and was used to detect elevated HGF levels in sera from recurrent breast cancer patients. The microarray format provides the potential for high-throughput quantitation of multiple biomarkers in parallel, as demonstrated with a multiplex analysis of five biomarker proteins.     

Discovery of Colorectal Cancer Biomarker Candidates by Membrane Proteomic Analysis and Subsequent Verification using Selected Reaction Monitoring (SRM) and Tissue Microarray (TMA) Analysis

Recent advances in quantitative proteomic technology have enabled the large-scale validation of biomarkers. We here performed a quantitative proteomic analysis of membrane fractions from colorectal cancer tissue to discover biomarker candidates, and then extensively validated the candidate proteins identified. A total of 5566 proteins were identified in six tissue samples, each of which was obtained from polyps and cancer with and without metastasis. GO cellular component analysis predicted that 3087 of these proteins were membrane proteins, whereas TMHMM algorithm predicted that 1567 proteins had a transmembrane domain. Differences were observed in the expression of 159 membrane proteins and 55 extracellular proteins between polyps and cancer without metastasis, while the expression of 32 membrane proteins and 17 extracellular proteins differed between cancer with and without metastasis. A total of 105 of these biomarker candidates were quantitated using selected (or multiple) reaction monitoring (SRM/MRM) with stable synthetic isotope-labeled peptides as an internal control. The results obtained revealed differences in the expression of 69 of these proteins, and this was subsequently verified in an independent set of patient samples (polyps (n = 10), cancer without metastasis (n = 10), cancer with metastasis (n = 10)). Significant differences were observed in the expression of 44 of these proteins, including ITGA5, GPRC5A, PDGFRB, and TFRC, which have already been shown to be overexpressed in colorectal cancer, as well as proteins with unknown function, such as C8orf55. The expression of C8orf55 was also shown to be high not only in colorectal cancer, but also in several cancer tissues using a multicancer tissue microarray, which included 1150 cores from 14 cancer tissues. This is the largest verification study of biomarker candidate membrane proteins to date; our methods for biomarker discovery and subsequent validation using SRM/MRM will contribute to the identification of useful biomarker candidates for various cancers. Data are available via ProteomeXchange with identifier PXD000851.Recent advances in proteomic technology have contributed to the identification of biomarkers for various diseases. Improvements in LC-MS technology have led to an increase in the number of proteins that have been identified. In addition, a stable isotopic labeling method using isobaric tag for relative and absolute quantitation (iTRAQ)¹ and stable isotope labeling by amino acids in cell culture has enabled the quantitative analysis of multiple samples (1, 2). Therefore, a large number of proteins have already been identified as biomarker candidates; however, only a few of these have been used in practical applications because most have not yet progressed to the validation stage, in which potential biomarker candidates are quantified on a large scale. The validation of biomarker candidates is generally accomplished using Western blotting and enzyme-linked immunosorbent assays (ELISA) if specific and well-characterized antibodies for these candidates are available. However, highly specific antibodies are not currently available for most novel biomarker candidate proteins, and it takes a significant amount of time and money to obtain these antibodies and optimize ELISA assay systems for many candidates; therefore, another validation assay system needs to be developed. Selected (or multiple) reaction monitoring (SRM or MRM) was previously shown to be a potentially effective method for the validation of biomarker candidates (3–5). The SRM/MRM assay can measure multiple targets at high sensitivity and throughput without antibodies; hence, it is useful for initial quantitative evaluations and the large-scale validation of biomarker candidates, which defines validation of hundreds of biomarker candidate proteins simultaneously.In addition to these technical improvements, the fractionation process also plays an important role in proteome analysis for biomarker discovery. This procedure very effectively analyzes the proteomes of specific cellular compartments or organelles in detail, which reduces sample complexity. The preparation of a membrane fraction was previously shown to be useful for identifying membrane proteins that are generally expressed at relatively low levels. Membrane proteins play critical roles in many biological functions, such as signal transduction, cell-cell interactions, and ion transport, account for ∼38% of all proteins encoded by the mammalian genome and more than one-third of biomarker candidates, and are also potential targets for drug therapy (6, 7). Therefore, membrane proteome analysis is important for biomarker discovery. However, difficulties have been associated with extracting and solubilizing membrane proteins and subsequent protease digestion. Many procedures have consequently been developed to improve the solubilization and digestion of membrane proteins (8–11), and a protocol using phase transfer surfactant (PTS) was shown to be suitable for membrane proteomics using LC-MS/MS (12, 13).The selection of a control group for comparisons is also important for identifying potential biomarkers. Tissue samples from cancer patients have been used in many studies to discover biomarker candidates by proteomic analysis. Previous studies, including our own, attempted to compare cancer tissues with matched normal tissue (14–17). However, marked differences have been reported in the histology, genetics, and proteomics of normal and cancer tissues, and many biomarker candidates have been identified, by making it difficult to narrow down more reliable candidates for further validation. Lazebnik recently emphasized that the features of malignant, but not benign tumors could be used as a hallmark of cancer (18), and also that premalignant lesions were more appropriate controls for cancer tissue than normal tissue for the identification of biomarker candidates involved in cancer progression. Moreover, comparisons of cancer with and without metastasis may also assist in the discovery of biomarker candidates involved in cancer metastasis. Therefore, the identification of biomarker candidates that can be used to diagnose and determine the prognosis of cancer should become more effective by comparing cancer tissues at different stages, including benign tumors.We performed a shotgun proteomic analysis of membrane fractions prepared from colorectal cancer tissue and benign polyps in the present study to identify biomarker candidates for the diagnosis and treatment of cancer. We identified a large number of biomarker candidate proteins associated with the progression of colon cancer by using membrane protein extraction with PTS followed by iTRAQ labeling. SRM/MRM confirmed the altered expression of these biomarker candidates, and these results were further verified using an independent set of tissue samples. A protein with uncharacterized function, C8orf55, was also validated with a tissue microarray that included various types of cancers.     

Early detection of colon cancer: new tests on the horizon

This year, the American Cancer Society reported that the rate of decline in both the incidence and mortality of colorectal cancer has increased over the last two decades. This success is felt to be attributable to the early detection and treatment of colonic adenomas and early-stage colorectal cancers. However, the current recommended 'menu of options' for screening is limited by poor patient acceptance, low sensitivity, and both high cost and poor accessibility for application to a large general screening population (colonoscopy). Computerized tomography and magnetic resonance colonography offer an alternative method for the identification of polyps and early lesions in certain patients, but have cost, access, and acceptance limitations that are similar to those of colonoscopy; thus, they present similar barriers to their use in broad population screening. These limitations provide a strong rationale for the development of early colorectal cancer detection biomarkers that are simple to use and are cost effective. A successful biomarker or biomarker panel, coupled with the colonoscopic follow-up of only those patients with positive results, would reduce the burden and morbidity associated with the screening of colonoscopy. This would most likely result in enhanced adherence to colorectal screening, as well as a dramatic reduction in the incidence and mortality rates of colorectal cancer. In this paper, we review recent advances in the discovery of potential colorectal cancer biomarkers. Their applicability to clinical population screening will require large prospective validation.     

Protein biomarker validation via proximity ligation assays

The ability to detect minute amounts of specific proteins or protein modifications in blood as biomarkers for a plethora of human pathological conditions holds great promise for future medicine. Despite a large number of plausible candidate protein biomarkers published annually, the translation to clinical use is impeded by factors such as the required size of the initial studies, and limitations of the technologies used. The proximity ligation assay (PLA) is a versatile molecular tool that has the potential to address some obstacles, both in validation of biomarkers previously discovered using other techniques, and for future routine clinical diagnostic needs. The enhanced specificity of PLA extends the opportunities for large-scale, high-performance analyses of proteins. Besides advantages in the form of minimal sample consumption and an extended dynamic range, the PLA technique allows flexible assay reconfiguration. The technology can be adapted for detecting protein complexes, proximity between proteins in extracellular vesicles or in circulating tumor cells, and to address multiple post-translational modifications in the same protein molecule. We discuss herein requirements for biomarker validation, and how PLA may play an increasing role in this regard. We describe some recent developments of the technology, including proximity extension assays, the use of recombinant affinity reagents suitable for use in proximity assays, and the potential for single cell proteomics. This article is part of a Special Issue entitled: Biomarkers: A Proteomic Challenge.     

Analytical Performance of ELISA Assays in Urine: One More Bottleneck towards Biomarker Validation and Clinical Implementation

ELISA is the main approach for the sensitive quantification of protein biomarkers in body fluids and is currently employed in clinical laboratories for the measurement of clinical markers. As such, it also constitutes the main methodological approach for biomarker validation and further qualification. For the latter, specific assay performance requirements have to be met, as described in respective guidelines of regulatory agencies. Even though many clinical ELISA assays in serum are regularly used, ELISA clinical applications in urine are significantly less. The scope of our study was to evaluate ELISA assay analytical performance in urine for a series of potential biomarkers for bladder cancer, as a first step towards their large scale clinical validation. Seven biomarkers (Secreted protein acidic and rich in cysteine, Survivin, Slit homolog 2 protein, NRC-Interacting Factor 1, Histone 2B, Proteinase-3 and Profilin-1) previously described in the literature as having differential expression in bladder cancer were included in the study. A total of 11 commercially available ELISA tests for these markers were tested by standard curve analysis, assay reproducibility, linearity and spiking experiments. The results show disappointing performance with coefficients of variation>20% for the vast majority of the tests performed. Only 3 assays (for Secreted protein acidic and rich in cysteine, Survivin and Slit homolog 2 protein) passed the accuracy thresholds and were found suitable for further application in marker quantification. These results collectively reflect the difficulties in developing urine-based ELISA assays of sufficient analytical performance for clinical application, presumably attributed to the urine matrix itself and/or presence of markers in various isoforms.     

Early biomarkers of joint damage in rheumatoid and psoriatic arthritis

Joint destruction, as evidenced by radiographic findings, is a significant problem for patients suffering from rheumatoid arthritis and psoriatic arthritis. Inherently irreversible and frequently progressive, the process of joint damage begins at and even before the clinical onset of disease. However, rheumatoid and psoriatic arthropathies are heterogeneous in nature and not all patients progress to joint damage. It is therefore important to identify patients susceptible to joint destruction in order to initiate more aggressive treatment as soon as possible and thereby potentially prevent irreversible joint damage. At the same time, the high cost and potential side effects associated with aggressive treatment mean it is also important not to over treat patients and especially those who, even if left untreated, would not progress to joint destruction. It is therefore clear that a protein biomarker signature that could predict joint damage at an early stage would support more informed clinical decisions on the most appropriate treatment regimens for individual patients. Although many candidate biomarkers for rheumatoid and psoriatic arthritis have been reported in the literature, relatively few have reached clinical use and as a consequence the number of prognostic biomarkers used in rheumatology has remained relatively static for several years. It has become evident that a significant challenge in the transition of biomarker candidates to clinical diagnostic assays lies in the development of suitably robust biomarker assays, especially multiplexed assays, and their clinical validation in appropriate patient sample cohorts. Recent developments in mass spectrometry-based targeted quantitative protein measurements have transformed our ability to rapidly develop multiplexed protein biomarker assays. These advances are likely to have a significant impact on the validation of biomarkers in the future. In this review, we have comprehensively compiled a list of candidate biomarkers in rheumatoid and psoriatic arthritis, evaluated the evidence for their potential as biomarkers of bone (joint) damage, and outlined how mass spectrometry-based targeted and multiplexed measurement of candidate biomarker proteins is likely to accelerate their clinical validation and the development of clinical diagnostic tests.     

A multiplex platform for the identification of ovarian cancer biomarkers

Background

Currently, there are no FDA approved screening tools for detecting early stage ovarian cancer in the general population. Development of a biomarker-based assay for early detection would significantly improve the survival of ovarian cancer patients.

Methods

We used a multiplex approach to identify protein biomarkers for detecting early stage ovarian cancer. This new technology (Proseek^® Multiplex Oncology Plates) can simultaneously measure the expression of 92 proteins in serum based on a proximity extension assay. We analyzed serum samples from 81 women representing healthy, benign pathology, early, and advanced stage serous ovarian cancer patients.

Results

Principle component analysis and unsupervised hierarchical clustering separated patients into cancer versus non-cancer subgroups. Data from the Proseek^® plate for CA125 levels exhibited a strong correlation with current clinical assays for CA125 (correlation coefficient of 0.89, 95% CI 0.83, 0.93). CA125 and HE4 were present at very low levels in healthy controls and benign cases, while higher levels were found in early stage cases, with highest levels found in the advanced stage cases. Overall, significant trends were observed for 38 of the 92 proteins (p < 0.001), many of which are novel candidate serum biomarkers for ovarian cancer. The area under the ROC curve (AUC) for CA125 was 0.98 and the AUC for HE4 was 0.85 when comparing early stage ovarian cancer versus healthy controls. In total, 23 proteins had an estimated AUC of 0.7 or greater. Using a naïve Bayes classifier that combined 12 proteins, we improved the sensitivity corresponding to 95% specificity from 93 to 95% when compared to CA125 alone. Although small, a 2% increase would have a significant effect on the number of women correctly identified when screening a large population.

Conclusions

These data demonstrate that the Proseek^® technology can replicate the results established by conventional clinical assays for known biomarkers, identify new candidate biomarkers, and improve the sensitivity and specificity of CA125 alone. Additional studies using a larger cohort of patients will allow for validation of these biomarkers and lead to the development of a screening tool for detecting early stage ovarian cancer in the general population.

     

Population proteomics: the concept, attributes, and potential for cancer biomarker research

This review outlines the concept of population proteomics and its implication in the discovery and validation of cancer-specific protein modulations. Population proteomics is an applied subdiscipline of proteomics engaging in the investigation of human proteins across and within populations to define and better understand protein diversity. Population proteomics focuses on interrogation of specific proteins from large number of individuals, utilizing top-down, targeted affinity mass spectrometry approaches to probe protein modifications. Deglycosylation, sequence truncations, side-chain residue modifications, and other modifications have been reported for myriad of proteins, yet little is know about their incidence rate in the general population. Such information can be gathered via population proteomics and would greatly aid the biomarker discovery efforts. Discovery of novel protein modifications is also expected from such large scale population proteomics, expanding the protein knowledge database. In regard to cancer protein biomarkers, their validation via population proteomics-based approaches is advantageous as mass spectrometry detection is used both in the discovery and validation process, which is essential for the detection of those structurally modified protein biomarkers.     

Novel serological biomarker panel using protein microarray can distinguish active TB from latent TB infection

BackgroundRapid laboratory technologies which can effectively distinguish active tuberculosis (ATB) from controls and latent tuberculosis infection (LTBI) are lacked.The objective of this study is to explore MTB biomarkers in serum that can distinguish ATB from LTBI.MethodsWe constructed a tuberculosis protein microarray containing 64 MTB associated antigens. We then used this microarray to screen 180 serum samples, from patients with ATB and LTBI, and healthy volunteer controls. Both SAM (Significance analysis of microarrays) and ROC curve analysis were used to identify the differentially recognized biomarkers between groups. Extra 300 serum samples from patients with ATB and LTBI, and healthy volunteer controls were employed to validate the identified biomarkers using ELISA-based method.ResultsAccording to the results, the best biomarker combinations of 4 proteins (Rv1860, RV3881c, Rv2031c and Rv3803c) were selected. The biomarker panel containing these 4 proteins has reached a sensitivity of 93.3% and specificity of 97.7% for distinguishing ATB from LTBI, and a sensitivity of 86% and specificity of 97.6% for distinguishing ATB from HC.ConclusionThe biomarker combination in this study has high sensitivity and specificity in distinguishing ATB from LTBI, suggesting it is worthy for further validation in more clinical samples.     

Targeted proteomics: a bridge between discovery and validation

New technologies in mass spectrometry are beginning to mature and show unique advantages for the identification and quantitation of proteins. In recent years, one of the significant goals of clinical proteomics has been to identify biomarkers that can be used for clinical diagnosis. As technology has progressed, the list of potential biomarkers has grown. However, the verification and validation of these potential biomarkers is increasingly challenging and require high-throughput quantitative assays, targeting specific candidates. Targeted proteomics bridges the gap between biomarker discovery and the development of clinically applicable biomarker assays.     

Advances in ovarian cancer proteomics: the quest for biomarkers and improved therapeutic interventions

Epithelial ovarian cancer is the leading cause of cancer-related death among gynecological cancers due to the asymptomatic nature of the disease, a lack of early detection markers and the development of resistance to current chemotherapeutic agents. Currently available tests (CA-125, transvaginal ultrasound or combination of both) lack the sensitivity and specificity to be useful as an efficient screening tool for surveillance of the general population. Thus, there is an urgent need for the development and validation of new molecular markers that would be both specific and sensitive indicators of disease onset, as well as progression. Proteomic profiling has emerged as a powerful tool to study ovarian cancer in an unbiased way at the molecular level, to monitor the effects of given treatment options and for the discovery of biomarkers. In this review we discuss the challenges associated with proteomics-based biomarker discovery and some recent concepts to potentially overcome these hurdles. Recent proteomics work on ovarian cancer cells and tissues will be discussed in light of obtaining new insights into fundamental biological processes, as well as their potential integration with ongoing biomarker discovery pipelines.     

Perioperative immune responses in cancer patients undergoing digestive surgeries

Aims

We will examine the latest advances in genomic and proteomic laboratory technology. Through an extensive literature review we aim to critically appraise those studies which have utilized these latest technologies and ascertain their potential to identify clinically useful biomarkers.

Methods

An extensive review of the literature was carried out in both online medical journals and through the Royal College of Surgeons in Ireland library.

Results

Laboratory technology has advanced in the fields of genomics and oncoproteomics. Gene expression profiling with DNA microarray technology has allowed us to begin genetic profiling of colorectal cancer tissue. The response to chemotherapy can differ amongst individual tumors. For the first time researchers have begun to isolate and identify the genes responsible. New laboratory techniques allow us to isolate proteins preferentially expressed in colorectal cancer tissue. This could potentially lead to identification of a clinically useful protein biomarker in colorectal cancer screening and treatment.

Conclusion

If a set of discriminating genes could be used for characterization and prediction of chemotherapeutic response, an individualized tailored therapeutic regime could become the standard of care for those undergoing systemic treatment for colorectal cancer. New laboratory techniques of protein identification may eventually allow identification of a clinically useful biomarker that could be used for screening and treatment. At present however, both expression of different gene signatures and isolation of various protein peaks has been limited by study size. Independent multi-centre correlation of results with larger sample sizes is needed to allow translation into clinical practice.     

REG4 Is Highly Expressed in Mucinous Ovarian Cancer: A Potential Novel Serum Biomarker

Preoperative diagnostics of ovarian neoplasms rely on ultrasound imaging and the serum biomarkers CA125 and HE4. However, these markers may be elevated in non-neoplastic conditions and may fail to identify most non-serous epithelial cancer subtypes. The objective of this study was to identify histotype-specific serum biomarkers for mucinous ovarian cancer. The candidate genes with mucinous histotype specific expression profile were identified from publicly available gene-expression databases and further in silico data mining was performed utilizing the MediSapiens database. Candidate biomarker validation was done using qRT-PCR, western blotting and immunohistochemical staining of tumor tissue microarrays. The expression level of the candidate gene in serum was compared to the serum CA125 and HE4 levels in a patient cohort of prospectively collected advanced ovarian cancer. Database searches identified REG4 as a potential biomarker with specificity for the mucinous ovarian cancer subtype. The specific expression within epithelial ovarian tumors was further confirmed by mRNA analysis. Immunohistochemical staining of ovarian tumor tissue arrays showed distinctive cytoplasmic expression pattern only in mucinous carcinomas and suggested differential expression between benign and malignant mucinous neoplasms. Finally, an ELISA based serum biomarker assay demonstrated increased expression only in patients with mucinous ovarian cancer. This study identifies REG4 as a potential serum biomarker for histotype-specific detection of mucinous ovarian cancer and suggests serum REG4 measurement as a non-invasive diagnostic tool for postoperative follow-up of patients with mucinous ovarian cancer.     

Advances in ovarian cancer proteomics: the quest for biomarkers and improved therapeutic interventions

Epithelial ovarian cancer is the leading cause of cancer-related death among gynecological cancers due to the asymptomatic nature of the disease, a lack of early detection markers and the development of resistance to current chemotherapeutic agents. Currently available tests (CA-125, transvaginal ultrasound or combination of both) lack the sensitivity and specificity to be useful as an efficient screening tool for surveillance of the general population. Thus, there is an urgent need for the development and validation of new molecular markers that would be both specific and sensitive indicators of disease onset, as well as progression. Proteomic profiling has emerged as a powerful tool to study ovarian cancer in an unbiased way at the molecular level, to monitor the effects of given treatment options and for the discovery of biomarkers. In this review we discuss the challenges associated with proteomics-based biomarker discovery and some recent concepts to potentially overcome these hurdles. Recent proteomics work on ovarian cancer cells and tissues will be discussed in light of obtaining new insights into fundamental biological processes, as well as their potential integration with ongoing biomarker discovery pipelines.     

Antibody microarray profiling of human prostate cancer sera: antibody screening and identification of potential biomarkers

We developed a practical strategy for serum protein profiling using antibody microarrays and applied the method to the identification of potential biomarkers in prostate cancer serum. Protein abundances from 33 prostate cancer and 20 control serum samples were compared to abundances from a common reference pool using a two-color fluorescence assay. Robotically spotted microarrays containing 184 unique antibodies were prepared on two different substrates: polyacrylamide based hydrogels on glass and poly-1-lysine coated glass with a photoreactive cross-linking layer. The hydrogel substrate yielded an average six-fold higher signal-to-noise ratio than the other substrate, and detection of protein binding was possible from a greater number of antibodies using the hydrogels. A statistical filter based on the correlation of data from "reverse-labeled" experiment sets accurately predicted the agreement between the microarray measurements and enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay measurements, showing that this parameter can serve to screen for antibodies that are functional on microarrays. Having defined a set of reliable microarray measurements, we identified five proteins (von Willebrand Factor, immunoglobulinM, Alpha1-antichymotrypsin, Villin and immunoglobulinG) that had significantly different levels between the prostate cancer samples and the controls. These developments enable the immediate use of high-density antibody and protein microarrays in biomarker discovery studies.     

Progress and challenges in screening for early detection of ovarian cancer

Ovarian cancer is characterize by few early symptoms, presentation at an advanced stage, and poor survival. As a result, it is the most frequent cause of death from gynecological cancer. During the last decade, a research effort has been directed toward improving outcomes for ovarian cancer by screening for preclinical, early stage disease using both imaging techniques and serum markers. Numerous biomarkers have shown potential in samples from clinically diagnosed ovarian cancer patients, but few have been thoroughly assessed in preclinical disease and screening. The most thoroughly investigated biomarker in ovarian cancer screening is CA125. Prospective studies have demonstrated that both CA125 and transvaginal ultrasound can detect a significant proportion of preclinical ovarian cancers, and refinements in interpretation of results have improved sensitivity and reduced the false-positive rate of screening. There is preliminary evidence that screening can improve survival, but the impact of screening on mortality from ovarian cancer is still unclear. Prospective studies of screening are in progress in both the general population and high-risk population, including the United Kingdom Collaborative Trial of Ovarian Cancer Screening (UKCTOCS), a randomized trial involving 200,000 postmenopausal women designed to document the impact of screening on mortality. Recent advances in technology for the study of the serum proteome offer exciting opportunities for the identification of novel biomarkers or patterns of markers that will have greater sensitivity and lead time for preclinical disease than CA125. Considerable interest and controversy has been generated by initial results utilizing surface-enhanced laser desorption/ionization (SELDI) in ovarian cancer. There are challenging issues related to the design of studies to evaluate SELDI and other proteomic technology, as well as the reproducibility, sensitivity, and specificity of this new technology. Large serum banks such as that assembled in UKCTOCS, which contain preclinical samples from patients who later developed ovarian cancer and other disorders, provide a unique resource for carefully designed studies of proteomic technology. There is a sound basis for optimism that further developments in serum proteomic analysis will provide powerful methods for screening in ovarian cancer and many other diseases.