Flexible cullins in cullin-RING E3 ligases allosterically regulate ubiquitination

How do the cullins, with conserved structures, accommodate substrate-binding proteins with distinct shapes and sizes? Cullin-RING E3 ubiquitin ligases facilitate ubiquitin transfer from E2 to the substrate, tagging the substrate for degradation. They contain substrate-binding, adaptor, cullin, and Rbx proteins. Previously, we showed that substrate-binding and Rbx proteins are flexible. This allows shortening of the E2-substrate distance for initiation of ubiquitination or increasing the distance to accommodate the polyubiquitin chain. However, the role of the cullin remained unclear. Is cullin a rigid scaffold, or is it flexible and actively assists in the ubiquitin transfer reaction? Why are there different cullins, and how do these cullins specifically facilitate ubiquitination for different substrates? To answer these questions, we performed structural analysis and molecular dynamics simulations based on Cul1, Cul4A, and Cul5 crystal structures. Our results show that these three cullins are not rigid scaffolds but are flexible with conserved hinges in the N-terminal domain. However, the degrees of flexibilities are distinct among the different cullins. Of interest, Cul1 flexibility can also be changed by deletion of the long loop (which is absent in Cul4A) in the N-terminal domain, suggesting that the loop may have an allosteric functional role. In all three cases, these conformational changes increase the E2-substrate distance to a specific range to facilitate polyubiquitination, suggesting that rather than being inert scaffold proteins, cullins allosterically regulate ubiquitination.     

Roles of various cullin-RING E3 ligases involved in hormonal and stress responses in plants

Post-translational modification plays an important role in the regulation of protein stability, enzyme activity, and the cellular localization of proteins. Ubiquitination is a representative post-translational modification in eukaryotes that is mainly responsible for protein degradation. There have been a number of reports on the role of ubiquitination in various cellular responses in plants, such as regulation of the cell division cycle, stress responses and hormonal signaling. Among the three types of ubiquitination-related enzymes, E3 ubiquitin ligase is critical in determining substrate specificity. The importance of cullin-RING E3 ligase (CRL), a type of E3 ligase, has been emphasized during the recent decade due to its large number and its involvement in various plant cellular processes. Here, we describe how CRL E3 ligase complexes are involved in cellular events mediated by plant hormones and during plant stress adaptation while focusing on their substrate receptors.     

Function and regulation of cullin-RING ubiquitin ligases

Cullin-RING complexes comprise the largest known class of ubiquitin ligases. Owing to the great diversity of their substrate-receptor subunits, it is possible that there are hundreds of distinct cullin-RING ubiquitin ligases in eukaryotic cells, which establishes these enzymes as key mediators of post-translational protein regulation. In this review, we focus on the composition, regulation and function of cullin-RING ligases, and describe how these enzymes can be characterized by a set of general principles.     

Regulation of DNA damage response pathways by the cullin-RING ubiquitin ligases

Eukaryotic cells repair ultraviolet light (UV)- and chemical carcinogen-induced DNA strand-distorting damage through the nucleotide excision repair (NER) pathway. Concurrent activation of the DNA damage checkpoints is also required to arrest the cell cycle and allow time for NER action. Recent studies uncovered critical roles for ubiquitin-mediated post-translational modifications in controlling both NER and checkpoint functions. In this review, we will discuss recent progress in delineating the roles of cullin-RING E3 ubiquitin ligases in orchestrating the cellular DNA damage response through ubiquitination of NER factors, histones, and checkpoint effectors.     

New classes of E3 ligases illuminated by chemical probes

Specificity in the ubiquitin system depends on E3 ligases, largely belonging to a handful of families discovered more than a decade ago. However, the last two years brought a quantum leap in the identification and/or mechanistic characterization of eukaryotic ubiquitin ligases, in part through implementation of activity-based chemical probes and cryo-EM. Here, we survey recent discoveries of RING-Cys-Relay, RZ-finger, and neddylated cullin–RING–ARIH RBR E3–E3 ubiquitin ligase mechanisms. These ligases transfer ubiquitin through unprecedented mechanisms—via novel catalytic domains or domain combinations—and collectively modify unconventional amino acids, non-proteinaceous bacterial lipid targets, and structurally-diverse substrates recruited to numerous cullin–RING ligases. We anticipate major expansion of the types, features, and mechanisms of E3 ligases will emerge from such chemical and structural approaches in the coming years.     

Targeting cullin-RING ligases for cancer treatment: rationales,advances and therapeutic implications

New therapeutic intervention strategies for the treatment of human malignancies are always desired. Approval of bortezomib as a front-line treatment for multiple myeloma highlighted the significance of ubiquitin–proteasome system (UPS) as a promising therapeutic target. However, due to the broad impact of proteasome inhibition, deleterious side effects have been reported with bortezomib treatment. Cullin RING ligases (CRLs)-mediated ubiquitin conjugation process is responsible for the ubiquitin conjugation of 20 % cellular proteins that are designated for degradation through the UPS, most of them are critical proteins involved in cell cycle progression, signaling transduction and apoptosis. Studies have depicted the upstream NEDDylation pathway that controls the CRL activity by regulating the conjugation of an ubiquitin-like-protein NEDD8 to the cullin protein in the complex. A specific pharmaceutical inhibitor of NEDD8 activating enzyme (NAE; E1) MLN4924 was recently developed and has been promoted to Phase I clinical trials for the treatment of several human malignancies. This article summarizes the most recent understanding about the process of NEDD8 conjugation, its relevance for cancer therapy and molecular mechanisms responsible for the potent anti-tumor activity of MLN4924.     

Structural insights into NEDD8 activation of cullin-RING ligases: conformational control of conjugation

Cullin-RING ligases (CRLs) comprise the largest ubiquitin E3 subclass, in which a central cullin subunit links a substrate-binding adaptor with an E2-binding RING. Covalent attachment of the ubiquitin-like protein NEDD8 to a conserved C-terminal domain (ctd) lysine stimulates CRL ubiquitination activity and prevents binding of the inhibitor CAND1. Here we report striking conformational rearrangements in the crystal structure of NEDD8~Cul5(ctd)-Rbx1 and SAXS analysis of NEDD8~Cul1(ctd)-Rbx1 relative to their unmodified counterparts. In NEDD8ylated CRL structures, the cullin WHB and Rbx1 RING subdomains are dramatically reoriented, eliminating a CAND1-binding site and imparting multiple potential catalytic geometries to an associated E2. Biochemical analyses indicate that the structural malleability is important for both CRL NEDD8ylation and subsequent ubiquitination activities. Thus, our results point to a conformational control of CRL activity, with ligation of NEDD8 shifting equilibria to disfavor inactive CAND1-bound closed architectures, and favor dynamic, open forms that promote polyubiquitination.     

Cullin-containing E3 ubiquitin ligases in plant development

In eukaryotes, the ubiquitin-proteasome system participates in the control of signal transduction events by selectively eliminating regulatory proteins. E3 ubiquitin ligases specifically bind degradation substrates and mediate their poly-ubiquitylation, a prerequisite for their degradation by the 26S proteasome. On the basis of the analysis of the Arabidopsis genome sequence, it is predicted that there are more than 1000 E3 ubiquitin ligases in plants. Several types of E3 ubiquitin ligases have already been characterized in eukaryotes. Recently, some of these E3 enzymes have been implicated in specific plant signaling pathways.     

Functional analysis of Cullin 3 E3 ligases in tumorigenesis

Cullin 3-RING ligases (CRL3) play pivotal roles in the regulation of various physiological and pathological processes, including neoplastic events. The substrate adaptors of CRL3 typically contain a BTB domain that mediates the interaction between Cullin 3 and target substrates to promote their ubiquitination and subsequent degradation. The biological implications of CRL3 adaptor proteins have been well described where they have been found to play a role as either an oncogene, tumor suppressor, or can mediate either of these effects in a context-dependent manner. Among the extensively studied CRL3-based E3 ligases, the role of the adaptor protein SPOP (speckle type BTB/POZ protein) in tumorigenesis appears to be tissue or cellular context dependent. Specifically, SPOP acts as a tumor suppressor via destabilizing downstream oncoproteins in many malignancies, especially in prostate cancer. However, SPOP has largely an oncogenic role in kidney cancer. Keap1, another well-characterized CRL3 adaptor protein, likely serves as a tumor suppressor within diverse malignancies, mainly due to its specific turnover of its downstream oncogenic substrate, NRF2 (nuclear factor erythroid 2-related factor 2). In accordance with the physiological role the various CRL3 adaptors exhibit, several pharmacological agents have been developed to disrupt its E3 ligase activity, therefore blocking its potential oncogenic activity to mitigate tumorigenesis.     

E3 ubiquitin ligases and abscisic acid signaling

The ubiquitin proteasome system is involved in the regulation of nearly every aspect of plant growth and development. Protein ubiquitination involves the covalent attachment of ubiquitin to target proteins through a cascade catalyzed by three enzymes known as E1, E2 and E3. E3s are of particular interest as they confer substrate specificity during ubiquitination through their diverse substrate recognition domains. Recently, a number of E3s have been identified that actively participate in abscisic acid hormone biology, including regulation of biosynthesis, de-repression or activation of abscisic acid response and degradation of signaling components. In this review, we summarize recent exciting studies of the different types of E3s that target specific mediators of abscisic acid signaling or affect the plants response to the hormone.Key words: abscisic acid, E3 ubiquitin ligase, proteasome, ubiquitinationPost-translational control of protein degradation by the ubiquitin proteasome system (UPS) is a highly regulated process essential for the proper growth and development of all eukaryotes through removing abnormal proteins and most short-lived regulatory proteins.^1,2 Plants utilize the UPS to alter their proteome to mediate cellular changes required for growth, development and responses to biotic and abiotic stress. Plants also rely a great deal on hormones to induce changes in growth and development in response to a wide range of environmental stimuli. Hormone biosynthesis, perception, signaling and response can be exquisitely regulated through modulating protein levels via the UPS. Regulation of the abscisic acid (ABA) signaling pathway, like auxin, gibberellin, jasmonate and ethylene, have been linked to UPS components with the application of biochemical, genetic and genomic approaches.^3–5 Although some aspects of ABA signaling have been elucidated, the involvement of the UPS, especially E3 ubiquitin ligases, help us gain further insight into the entire network of ABA signal transduction. In this review we focus on recently identified E3s that play a variety of roles in ABA signaling. A number of articles are available that provide a comprehensive review of the role of E3 ligases in the biosynthesis, perception and signaling by other hormones such as auxin and ethylene.^3–5     

Regulation of apoptosis by E3 ubiquitin ligases in ubiquitin proteasome system

Apoptosis is an organised ATP‐dependent programmed cell death that organisms have evolved to maintain homoeostatic cell numbers and eliminate unnecessary or unhealthy cells from the system. Dysregulation of apoptosis can have serious manifestations culminating into various diseases, especially cancer. Accurate control of apoptosis requires regulation of a wide range of growth enhancing as well as anti‐oncogenic factors. Appropriate regulation of magnitude and temporal expression of key proteins is vital to maintain functional apoptotic signalling. Controlled protein turnover is thus critical to the unhindered operation of the apoptotic machinery, disruption of which can have severe consequences, foremost being oncogenic transformation of cells. The ubiquitin proteasome system (UPS) is one such major cellular pathway that maintains homoeostatic protein levels. Recent studies have found interesting links between these two fundamental cellular processes, wherein UPS depending on the cue can either inhibit or promote apoptosis. A diverse range of E3 ligases are involved in regulating the turnover of key proteins of the apoptotic pathway. This review summarises an overview of key E3 ubiquitin ligases involved in the regulation of the fundamental proteins involved in apoptosis, linking UPS to apoptosis and attempts to emphasize the significance of this relationship in context of cancer.     

A novel family of membrane-bound E3 ubiquitin ligases

A novel E3 ubiquitin ligase family that consists of viral E3 ubiquitin ligases (E3s) and their mammalian homologues was recently discovered. These novel E3s are membrane-bound molecules that share the secondary structure and catalytic domain for E3 activity. All family members have two transmembrane regions at the center and a RING-CH domain at the amino terminus. Forced expression of these novel E3s has been shown to reduce the surface expression of various membrane proteins through ubiquitination of target molecules. Initial examples of viral E3s were identified in Kaposi's sarcoma associated herpesvirus (KSHV) and murine gamma-herpesvirus 68 (MHV-68) and have been designated as modulator of immune recognition (MIR) 1, 2 and mK3, respectively. MIR 1, 2 and mK3 are able to down-regulate MHC class I molecule expression, and mK3 is required to establish an effective latent viral infection in vivo. The first characterized mammalian homologue to MIR 1, 2 and mK3 is c-MIR/MARCH VIII. Forced expression of c-MIR/MARCH VIII down-regulates B7-2, a co-stimulatory molecule important for antigen presentation. Subsequently, several mammalian molecules related to c-MIR/MARCH VIII have been characterized and named as membrane associated RING-CH (MARCH) family. However, the precise physiological function of MARCH family members remains as yet unknown.     

RBR E3‐ligases at work

The RING‐in‐between‐RING (RBR) E3s are a curious family of ubiquitin E3‐ligases, whose mechanism of action is unusual in several ways. Their activities are auto‐inhibited, causing a requirement for activation by protein‐protein interactions or posttranslational modifications. They catalyse ubiquitin conjugation by a concerted RING/HECT‐like mechanism in which the RING1 domain facilitates E2‐discharge to directly form a thioester intermediate with a cysteine in RING2. This short‐lived, HECT‐like intermediate then modifies the target. Uniquely, the RBR ligase HOIP makes use of this mechanism to target the ubiquitin amino‐terminus, by presenting the target ubiquitin for modification using its distinctive LDD region.     

Regulation of cullin RING E3 ubiquitin ligases by CAND1 in vivo

Cullin RING ligases are multi-subunit complexes consisting of a cullin protein which forms a scaffold onto which the RING protein Rbx1/2 and substrate receptor subunits assemble. CAND1, which binds to cullins that are not conjugated with Nedd8 and not associated with substrate receptors, has been shown to function as a positive regulator of Cullin ligases in vivo. Two models have been proposed to explain this requirement: (i) CAND1 sequesters cullin proteins and thus prevents autoubiquitination of substrate receptors, and (ii) CAND1 is required to promote the exchange of bound substrate receptors. Using mammalian cells, we show that CAND1 is predominantly cytoplasmically localized and that cullins are the major CAND1 interacting proteins. However, only small amounts of CAND1 bind to Cul1 in cells, despite low basal levels of Cul1 neddylation and approximately equal cytoplasmic endogenous protein concentrations of CAND1 and Cul1. Compared to F-box protein substrate receptors, binding of CAND1 to Cul1 in vivo is weak. Furthermore, preventing binding of F-box substrate receptors to Cul1 does not increase CAND1 binding. In conclusion, our study suggests that CAND1 does not function by sequestering cullins in vivo to prevent substrate receptor autoubiquitination and is likely to regulate cullin RING ligase activity via alternative mechanisms.