Results of point stenting of extended coronary stenosis in patients with ischemic heart disease

The paper analyzes the immediate and long-term results of point stenting in patients with extended (more than 30 mm) coronary stenoses and compares them with those obtained by routine stenting. The study included 177 patients with varying extent stenoses who underwent traditional implantation of intracoronary stents. Thirty-seven patients undergone the so-called point stenting formed a separate group. There was no significant difference in clinical and angiographic success rates between the patients of all three groups. Significant difference was also absent in subacute stent thrombosis between the patients of Groups 2 and 3 and those of the point stenting group. Thus, acute or subacute stent thrombosis was noted in 4 (2.3%) patients from the routine stenting groups, all the patients being from Groups 2 and 3, and in 2 (5.4%) from the point stenting group. No significant difference was found in the incidence of recurrent angina pectoris (restenosis) between Groups 1 and 2 and between Groups 2 and 3. At the same time, recurrent angina (restenosis) significantly more frequently developed in the patients of Group 3 than those of Group 1. As compared with Groups 2 and 3 patients, there was no significant difference in the incidence of recurrent angina (restenosis).     

Results of coronary stenting in relation to the length of an implanted stent

The paper considers the impact of the length of an implanted stent on the early and late outcomes of intracoronary stenting. The study included 177 patients on a retrospective basis. They all underwent intracoronary stenting of 215 stenoses. All the patients were divided into three groups in relation to the length of an implanted segment (under 20 mm, 20-30 mm, and under 30 mm). In 16 (9.04%) of the 177 patients, for complete stenosis correction, several, but not one, stents were inserted, i.e. multiple stenting of a coronary stenting was performed. The stents were implanted by the conventional procedure. There was no significant difference in clinical and angiographic success rates between the patients of all three groups. There were no complications, such as transmural myocardial infarction and deaths in any groups. Acute stent thrombosis was noted only in 1 (1.8%). There was no significant difference in the incidence of subacute stent thrombosis between Groups 2 and 3 patients. No case of subacute thrombosis of implanted stents was noted in Group 1 patients. Thus, acute and subacute stent thromboses were observed in 4 (2.3%) patients, they being all from Groups 2 and 3. There was no significant difference in the development of restenosis between Groups 1 and 2 and Groups 2 and 3. At the same time, restenosis significantly more frequently developed in patients from Group 3 than in those from Group 1. Thus, the findings indicate that the length of a stented segment is an important factor that influence both early and late outcomes of intracoronary stenting.     

Immediate and long-term results of coronary stent implantation without predilatation (direct stenting) in patients with coronary heart disease

The paper assesses the immediate and long-term results of direct stenting (without the stage of predilation) and compares with the outcomes of conventional stent implantation. A prospective study included 183 patients. All the patients were divided into two groups according to the procedure of stent implantation. In 85 (46.7%) patients, the stent was implanted without preliminary predilation of stenosis (direct stenting). These patients formed Group 1. Group 2 comprised 97 (53.3%) patients in whom the stent was placed by using the routine procedure. All the patients enrolled into the study had types A, B1, and B2 stenoses according to the ACC/AHA classification and received the conventional antiaggregatory and anticoagulant therapy. The technical success of direct stenting was 97.7%. There were no cases of stent dislocation and loss during direct stenting or expansion of a balloon and stent. Analyzing the immediate results in all the patients of the both groups showed a positive angiographic success. Thus, a primary angiographic and clinical success of direct stenting was achieved in all (100%) patients. Recurrent angina pectoris with restenosis was observed in 8 (9.4%) patients in Group 1 and in 21 (21.6%) in Group 2 (p < 0.05). Direct stenting significantly differs from the routine stent implantation in all procedure parameters. Thus, direct stenting in patients with uncomplicated stenoses is a safe and feasible procedure.     

Comparison of the results of stenting ans balloon angioplasty of coronary arteries in relation to the type of stenosis

Based on the comparison of the immediate and late results of stenting and balloon angioplasty (BA), the authors consider whether it is expedient to perform stenting of coronary arteries (CA) in all cases of BA in patients with coronary heart disease (CHD) and different types of CA stenosis. The study included 410 patients: a group of stenting (n = 197) and a group of traditional BA (n = 213). All the patients in both groups were divided into four subgroups in relation to the type of detected stenosis according to the classification of the American Association of Cardiologists (ACC/AHA). The positive angiographic and clinical results were observed in all 197 patients after stenting. This was associated neither with the type of dilated stenosis nor with the design of an implanted stent. In dilation of types A and B1 stenoses, a stent-like result was significantly more frequently observed than in dilation of types B2 and C stenoses. There was no significant difference in the development of restenosis in patients after routine BA and stenting of types A and B1 stenoses. At the same time, after BA of types B2 and C stenoses, restenosis developed significantly more frequently than in stenting. Thus, on the basis of this study, it may be stated that the traditional BA yields the so-called stent-like result significantly more frequently in patients with uncomplicated forms of CA stenoses than in those with complicated ones. Once the stent-like result is achieved in patients with type A stenoses, stenting should not be performed since the latter fails to improve the immediate and late results of angioplasty. Despite that the stent-like result is achieved in patients with complicated forms of CA stenoses, it is expedient to make stenting. Our findings indicate that the obtained good immediate result reduces the incidence of restenosis.     

Efficiency of endovascular re-interventions for evolving restenosis of different types of stents

The paper compares the results of different treatment options (balloon angioplasty and restenting) for in-stent restenosis in case of evolving restenosis of drug- and nondrug eluting stents. The investigation enrolled 496 coronary heart disease patients with clinical presentation of angina pectoris and/or signs of myocardial ischemia, as well as hemodynamic restenosis of a previously implanted stent. Of them, 216 and 280 patients had restenosis of previously implanted drug- and nondrug-eluting stents, respectively. In the patients with non-drug-eluting stent restenosis, recurrent angina pectoris and the frequency of repeated restenosis were significantly more frequently observed after balloon dilatation than after drug-eluting stent implantation (28.4 and 10.2%; p < 0.05; 19.9 and 8.7%; p < 0.05). In those with drug-eluting stent restenosis, recurrent angina pectoris and the frequency of repeated restenosis did not differ significantly between balloon dilatation of restenosis and implantation of a second drug-eluting stent.     

Long-term comparison of balloon angioplasty with provisional stenting versus routine stenting in patients with non-ST-elevation acute coronary syndrome

Background. In patients with unstable angina or non-ST-elevation acute coronary syndrome (NSTE-ACS) who are eligible for PCI, routine stenting is the recommended treatment strategy, based on the opinion of experts. Provisional stenting may provide a viable alternative by retaining the early benefits of stenting without its potential late hazards. Method. Patients with NSTE-ACS were randomised to provisional or routine stenting after coronary angiography. Patients were followed for up to ten years. The occurrence of major adverse cardiac events (MACE) was recorded. Results. 237 consecutive patients with NSTE-ACS were randomly assigned to routine stenting (n=116) or provisional stenting (n=121). No difference in the incidence of MACE at 30 days was observed. At six months, angiographic restenosis was lower in the routine stenting group (41 vs. 20%, p=0.02), paralleled by more MACE in the provisional stenting group at one year (40.5 vs. 27.6%, p=0.036). At complete follow-up the difference in MACE was not significant (61.2 vs. 50%, p=0.084) because of relatively more target lesion revascularisations in the routine stent group. There was no difference in the incidence of very late stent thrombosis (1.7 vs. 3.4%, p=0.439). The only independent predictor of MACE was β-blocker use (RR 0.62 [0.431; 0.892] p=0.010). Conclusion. In selective patients with NSTE-ACS, routine stenting was more beneficial than provisional stenting for a period of up to five years, driven by a reduction in repeat revascularisation procedures. After this period, the benefit was no longer significant. Beta-blocker use was the only independent predictor of MACE throughout the complete follow-up period. (Neth Heart J 2010;18:307-313.)     

Long-term assessment of clinical parameters in patients with coronary heart disease after balloon angioplasty and stenting balloon angioplasty

The aim of this study was to assess clinical parameters in patients with coronary heart disease (CHD) in the late period after balloon coronary angioplasty (BCA) and intracoronary stenting (ICS). The study included 104 patients who underwent repeated coronary angiography (CA) 2-10 months after successful coronary angioplasty. Clinical parameters were analyzed in 2 groups comparable at the moment of its performance in terms of major clinical characteristics. Group 1 comprised 51 patients following BCA and group 2 included 53 patients after ICS. Six months after the first procedure, repeated coronary angioplasty was performed in 19 (37.2%) and 6 (9.4%) patients after BCA and ICS, respectively (p < 0.05). Recurrent angina pectoris was observed in 42 patients from group 1 and in 25 ones from group 2, which was 82.3 and 47.2%, respectively (p < 0.05). Control CA revealed restenosis of the dilated artery in 22 (43.1%) of the 51 patients of group 1 and in 12 (22.6%) of the 53 patients of group 2. There were no differences between the groups in late postoperative bicycle ergometric and 24-hour ECG monitoring findings. The findings have led to the conclusion that implantation of a stent into the coronary artery greatly prolongs the antiischemic effect of coronary angioplasty and reduces a need for repeated endovascular intervention, which appears as lower incidence rates of restenosis and recurrent angina as compared to routine balloon angioplasty.     

Stent implantation in acute myocardial infarction using a heparin-coated stent: a pilot study as a preamble to a randomized trial comparing balloon angioplasty and stenting

Preliminary experience with primary stenting in myocardial infarction has suggested a greater benefit in clinical outcome than has been obtained with direct balloon angioplasty. However, subacute thrombosis (SAT) remains a limitation for this new mode of therapy. In the BENESTENT II Pilot and main trials, the incidence of SAT with the heparin-coated Palmaz-Schatz stent was only 0.15%. Therefore, as a preamble to a large randomized trial, the feasibility and safety of the use of the Heparin-Coated Palmaz-Schatz trade mark Stent in Acute Myocardial Infarction (AMI) was tested in 101 patients enrolled between April and September 1996 in 18 clinical centres. In 101 stent-eligible AMI patients, as dictated by protocol, a heparin-coated stent was implanted. The primary objectives were to determine the in-hospital incidence of major adverse cardiac events (MACE: death, MI, target lesion revascularization) and bleeding complications, while the secondary objectives were the procedural success rate and the MACE, the restenosis and reocclusion rates at 6.5 months. Stent implantation (n 3 129 stents) was successful in 97 patients of the 101 who were included in this trial. During their hospital stay, two patients died and no patient experienced re-infarction, ischaemia prompting re-PTCA or CABG. Four patients suffered a bleeding complication, three major and one minor, of whom three required surgical repair. At 210 days follow-up, 81% of the patients were event free. At 6.5 months restenosis was documented in 18% of the 88 patients who underwent follow-up angiography, including three total occlusions. The results, both with respect to QCA and the occurrence of MACE, compare favourably with studies using elective stenting in both stable and unstable angina patients. As a result of this pilot study, a large randomized trial comparing direct balloon angioplasty with direct stenting in 900 patients with AMI was initiated in December 1996.     

Direct coronary arterial stenting without predilatation in patients with coronary heart disease

The study was undertaken to evaluate the safety and efficiency of direct stenting versus routine stenting with predilation. It included 133 patients. By the decision of operators, direct stenting was conducted in 66 patients (71 stenoses) (Group 1). The remaining 67 patients (73 stenoses) underwent routine stenting with predilation (Group 2). The initial angiographic success of stenting was 100% in Group 1 and 98 in Group 2. Complications were absent. In the direct stenting group, technical problems occurred during a session in 9 (12%) cases. In this group the mean duration of fluoroscopy and the total duration of a session were much less than in the routine stenting group. The mean number of balloons used at dilation per stenosis and the number of dilation sessions per stenosis were much lower in Group 1 than in Group 2. The results of quantitative angiogram analysis before and after a session were similar in both patient groups. Six months following stenting, angiographic restenosis occurred in 7 (10%) patients in Group 1 and in 9 (12%) in Group 2. Direct stenting is a safe and effective treatment for non-occlusive coronary lesions without marked kinks and calcinosis. Direct stenting reduces the duration of fluoroscopy and the total duration of an operation by 50 and 22%, respectively, as compared to predilation stenting.     

Clinical trends in stent treatment of simple and complex coronary disease

This is a retrospective analysis of a consecutive group of patients from a single medical center who underwent stent implantation. It describes 316 patients who constituted 53% of the angioplasty procedures carried out in a single year. The authors describe the complications and their 1-year follow-up. We aimed to study the short and long-term results of stenting in our centre in relation to multiple clinical and angiographic variables. During 1996, 316 consecutive patients were treated with stent implantation for a total of 381 coronary lesions. The pharmacological protocol methods of stent implantation and patient characteristics were used. Clinical variables were: age 59.1 3 10.7 years, diabetes mellitus 25.3%, hypertension 33.0% and angina pectoris 88.7% (unstable in 44.1%). Previous coronary surgery had been undergone by 9.2%. Multivessel disease was present in 56% of the patients. The indications for stenting were: primary 58.5%, suboptimal results 33.0% and threatened or acute occlusion 8.5%. Angiographic success was 98.9% and clinical success 96.8%. The major in-hospital complications were acute myocardial infarction (2.2%), acute revascularization (0.3%) and major bleeding (0.6%). All occurred within 24 h of revascularization. Repeated angiography was performed in 115 cases (30.2%) at 160.3 3 109.4 days after stent procedure for unstable angina (38.7%), stable angina (26.1%) and other causes (35.2%). The restenosis rate in those catheterized was 38.1%, with an overall clinical restenosis rate of 11.3% during the follow-up period. Restenosis was more prevalent among diabetic patients (17.9 vs 9.15%, P 3 0.02) and patients with prior balloon angioplasty (18.6 vs 9.75%, P 3 0.046). Clinical follow-up was available in 90.8% of the patients for 291 3 112 days. The actuarial survival at the end of the follow-up period was 93.8%. Death/myocardial infarction was associated with unstable angina pectoris (P 3 0.006), hypertension (P 3 0.001), smoking (P 3 0.046) and threatened or acute occlusion (P < 0.001). In the first year of extensive stent use, stenting is associated with high technical and clinical success rates. Long-term results after stent implantation are associated with the occurrence of acute or threatened occlusion, and the in-hospital complications diabetes mellitus and hypertension.     

Clinical and angiographic results with the NIR stent: First International NIR Endovascular Stent Study (FINESS-II)

BACKGROUND: Although safety and efficacy of the NIR trade mark stent have been reported, the long-term angiographic and clinical outcomes have yet to be investigated. The FINESS-II study (First International NIR Endovascular Stent Study) was designed to assess the procedural safety of single 9 and 16 mm NIR stent implantation, the six-month restenosis rate and finally the six- and 12-month clinical outcome of patients treated with this novel coronary stent. METHODS: Patients with angina and a single de novo lesion in a native coronary artery of >3 and <5 mm diameter were included in this multicentre, prospective, observational trial. Clinical follow-up was obtained at one, six and 12 months. Angiography was performed before and after the stent implantation and at six months. The primary endpoint included major adverse cardiac events (death, myocardial infarction and target lesion revascularization) within 30 days after the procedure. Major bleeding complications and subacute stent thrombosis within the first 30 days were also reported as specific endpoints. Secondary endpoints were major cardiac-event-free survival at six- and 12-month follow-up and angiographic restenosis at six months. RESULTS: A total of 156 patients (81% male, mean age 60 +/- 10 years), with stable (54%), unstable (40%) angina pectoris or silent ischemia (6%) were enrolled. The target vessel diameter was 2.94 +/- 0.54 mm. The minimal lumen diameter pre, post and at follow-up was 1.04 +/- 0.32 mm, 2.64 +/- 0.42 mm and 1.88 +/- 0.63 mm, respectively. Restenosis rate according to the >50% diameter stenosis criterion at six month follow-up was 19% (26/136). At 12 months, the event-free survival rate was 83% (two deaths, one Q-wave and three non-Q-wave myocardial infarctions, four bypass surgery and 17 target lesion revascularizations), while 87% of the patients were free of angina pectoris. CONCLUSION: the outcome of the FINESS-II trial is comparable to those observed in previous stent trials (Benestent II), indicating that the coronary NIR stent is safe and effective as a primary device for the treatment of native coronary artery lesions in patients with (un)stable angina pectoris.     

The effects of stenting on coronary endothelium from a molecular biological view: Time for improvement?

Coronary artery stenting following balloon angioplasty represents the gold standard in revascularization of coronary artery stenoses. However, stent deployment as well as percutaneous transluminal coronary angioplasty (PTCA) alone causes severe injury of vascular endothelium. The damaged endothelium is intrinsically repaired by locally derived endothelial cells and by circulating endothelial progenitor cells from the blood, leading to re‐population of the denuded regions within several weeks to months. However, the process of re‐endothelialization is often incomplete or dysfunctional, promoting in‐stent thrombosis and restenosis. The molecular and biomechanical mechanisms that influence the process of re‐endothelialization in stented segments are incompletely understood. Once the endothelium is restored, endothelial function might still be impaired. Several strategies have been followed to improve endothelial function after coronary stenting. In this review, the effects of stenting on coronary endothelium are outlined and current and future strategies to improve endothelial function after stent deployment are discussed.     

药物涂层支架与金属裸支架治疗ST段抬高型心肌梗死的临床价值比较

目的：评价药物涂层支架（DES）与金属裸支架（BMS）在急性心肌梗死患者中应用的安全性和有效性。方法：选择2003年1月-2010年12月,在我院确诊的急性sT段抬高型心肌梗死（STEMI）167例患者,其中使用BMS65例,DES102例。对比分析两组患者住院期间和出院后1年内的主要心血管或脑血管事件（MAACE）的发生情况及支架内血栓形成的发生率。结果：至随访结束,BMS组有1例患者猝死,5例出现复发心绞痛。DES组有1例突发急性左心衰后死亡,1例复发心绞痛和1例发生亚急性支架内血栓。结论：DES应用于STEMI具有较好的安全性,其术后MAACE发生率较BMS低。     

Coronary stent implantation without balloon predilatation: a single-center experience

OBJECTIVE: Assessment of safety and efficacy of coronary stent deployment, without balloon predilatation. BACKGROUND: With newer high-performance balloon-premounted stents it has become more common to attempt coronary stent deployment without balloon pre- or postdilatation. METHODS: During 1998 524 coronary angioplasties were performed in the authors' institute, of which 279 resulted in coronary stenting. Of these 101 (36.2%) were stents without balloon predilatation (SWBP). PTCA was performed according to standard technique using mostly 7 F. guiding catheters, and 'rapid exchange' balloons and pre-mounted stents. RESULTS: Seventy-two patients had acute coronary syndromes (41 acute MI or post-MI angina, 28 unstable angina, 10 rescue PTCA after failed thrombolysis). Mean age was 56.4 3 11.1 years, 84.5% were males. Sixty per cent of the lesions were ACC-AHA type B2 or C. Target arteries were LAD 57.6%, LCX 21.2%, RCA 14.1% and SVG 7.1%. Procedure time was 18.2 3 17.3 minutes. Mean heparin dose was 3850 3 1570 units. Twenty-two patients received abciximab prior to stent deployment. Seven stents were not deployed without previous balloon dilatation and were retrieved safely via the guiding catheters and deployed after balloon dilatation. There was no stent embolization, ectopic suboptimal or partial stent deployment. Immediate angiographic success was obtained in 95 patients (94.1%). Minimal lumin diameter (MLD) increased from 0.27 3 0.15 to 3.23 3 2.1 mm. There were two in-hospital deaths (1.9%) due to cardiogenic shock. An intra-aortic balloon pump was required in eight patients. Two patients (1.9%) experienced subacute stent thrombosis. CONCLUSION: SWBP in selective groups of patients and lesions is feasible and safe. Larger randomized comparative trials are needed to assess the benefits and cost saving of this approach.     

Long-term clinical efficiency of endovascular treatment using Cypher rapamycin-eluting stents in patients with coronary heart disease

The study was undertaken to analyze the long-term results in patients with coronary heart disease (CHD) one year or more after Cypher stent implantation. It covered 1221 patients. One-, two-, and three- vessel lesions were observed in 693 (56.8%), 344 (28.2%), and 184 (15%) patients, respectively. A total of 1967 Cypher stents were implanted. The results of treatment were analyzed 1 and 2 years after intervention. The efficiency of a procedure was evaluated by the following parameters: the presence or absence of anginal symptoms, the presence and absence of complications (fatal outcome, myocardial infarction). The following morphological parameters: the rate of restenosis and that of late stent thrombosis were also assessed. The results of one- and two-year follow-ups were used to make a multivariate analysis of the clinical and morphological predictors of coronary complications (fatal outcome, myocardial infarction, recurrent angina pectoris) in the late period, as well as the predictors of restenosis and late stent thrombosis. Restenosis following 1 year of Cypher stent implantation is 3.1%. The factors that significantly increase the risk of this complication within the first year are diabetes mellitus and revascularization in the patients operated on. The one-year rate of Cypher stent thromboses is 1.6%. Patients' discontinuation of antiaggregant therapy is the sole factor that significantly increases the rate of their late thromboses in this period. Within the second year of a follow-up, the rate of late Cypher stent thromboses is 1.8%. The risk of this complication is significantly increased by factors, such as a lengthy (more than 3 mm) stented portion, renal failure, and less than 40% left ventricular ejection fraction.     

Stent Thrombosis is the Primary Cause of ST-Segment Elevation Myocardial Infarction following Coronary Stent Implantation: A Five Year Follow-Up of the SORT OUT II Study

Background

The widespread use of coronary stents has exposed a growing population to the risk of stent thrombosis, but the importance in terms of risk of ST-segment elevation myocardial infarctions (STEMIs) remains unclear.

Methods

We studied five years follow-up data for 2,098 all-comer patients treated with coronary stents in the randomized SORT OUT II trial (mean age 63.6 yrs. 74.8% men). Patients who following stent implantation were readmitted with STEMI were included and each patient was categorized ranging from definite- to ruled-out stent thrombosis according to the Academic Research Consortium definitions. Multivariate logistic regression was performed on selected covariates to assess odds ratios (ORs) for definite stent thrombosis.

Results

85 patients (4.1%), mean age 62.7 years, 77.1% men, were admitted with a total of 96 STEMIs, of whom 60 (62.5%) had definite stent thrombosis. Notably, definite stent thrombosis was more frequent in female than male STEMI patients (81.8% vs. 56.8%, p = 0.09), and in very late STEMIs (p = 0.06). Female sex (OR 3.53 [1.01–12.59]) and clopidogrel (OR 4.43 [1.03–19.01]) was associated with increased for definite stent thrombosis, whereas age, time since stent implantation, use of statins, initial PCI urgency (STEMI [primary PCI], NSTEMI/unstable angina [subacute PCI] or stable angina [elective PCI]), and glucose-lowering agents did not seem to influence risk of stent thrombosis.

Conclusion

In a contemporary cohort of coronary stented patients, stent thrombosis was evident in more than 60% of subsequent STEMIs.     

Results of intracoronary stenting made in different periods after diagnostic coronary angiography

The high cost of tools and expendable materials and its associated necessity of solving organizational issues force to delay the implementation of stenting for nonmedical reasons in many cases. This gives a convenient way to evaluate how much effective and safe stenting would be made just after coronary angiography or delayed intervention would be performed and at the same time to consider the way delay in stenting may affect its clinical and angiographic results. The study covered 136 patients with coronary heart disease who had been implanted an intracoronary stent. All this patients were divided into 3 groups. Group 1 included 16 patients who had undergone stent implantation just after diagnostic coronary angiography, Group 2 comprised 42 patients who had the similar procedure no later than a month after coronary angiography, and Group 3 consisted of 78 patients who had it a month or later following angiography. The angiographic success rates of stenting was 100% in Group 1, 97.6% in Group 2, and 92.3% in Group 3. The causes of poor results were evolving myocardial infarction (2.4%) and technical failure (2.4%) in Group 2; evolving myocardial infarction (2.6%), emergency aortocoronary bypass surgery (1.3%), and technical failure (3.8%) in Group 3. In Group 2, 4.8% cases of those undergone delayed stenting showed more significant stenosis than those having diagnostic intervention. In Group 3, there was more progressive stenosis in 16.7% and a transition of stenosis to occlusion in 7.8%. There were no complications (such as hemorrhage, retroperitoneal hematoma, etc.) at the site of puncture in Group 1, but in Group 2 and 3 they were 3.8 and 6.5%, respectively. Delayed stenting frequently adversely affects the outcomes of endovascular treatment due to the higher incidence of complication and to the increasing technical sophistication of the procedure no late than a month after diagnostic coronary angiography.     

Clinical outcomes of long coronary stents: a single-center experience

BACKGROUND: Coronary artery stenting is particularly useful during percutaneous coronary intervention for long lesions previously associated with a low procedural success rate and a high complication rate of dissection and occlusion. Current treatment options include implantation of a single long stent, multiple contiguous stents, or 'spot' stenting. However, multiple stent implantation may result in sections of overlapping stent or gaps of unstented segments and is an independent predictor of restenosis. The early and intermediate clinical outcome of single and multiple long stent (>/= 30 mm) implantation is not established. METHODS AND RESULTS: The authors retrospectively identified 123 consecutive patients who had undergone stenting using one or more long coronary stents. Baseline clinical data, procedural outcomes and completed clinical follow-up to 52 weeks were obtained by case-note review. The majority (69%) required intervention for stable coronary disease. Seventy-seven per cent of lesions were either type B2 or C and only 2% were in saphenous vein grafts. The procedural success rate was 94%. A total of 15 major events occurred in 13 patients (11%). Ten acute events occurred and five events were during the follow-up period from 30 days to 52 weeks. Two patients died, one from uncontrolled bleeding secondary to the use of antithrombotic agents and one at four weeks due to sudden death. One patient had a postprocedural infarct. Two patients required in-hospital repeat revascularization for acute vessel closure and eight required revascularization during follow-up (three cases of occlusion/thrombosis and five cases of restenosis). CONCLUSIONS: The use of long coronary stents (>/= 30 mm) for the treatment of long diffuse native vessel disease, saphenous vein graft disease and long coronary dissections is associated with a reasonable procedural success rate and acceptable early and intermediate-term clinical outcomes.     

Effect of Stent Inflation Pressure and Post-Dilatation on the Outcome of Coronary Artery Intervention. A Report of More than 90 000 Stent Implantations

Background

Percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) stent inflation pressure correlates to angiographic lumen improvement and stent expansion but the relation to outcome is not clarified. Using comprehensive registry data our aim was to evaluate how stent inflation pressure influences restenosis, stent thrombosis and death following PCI.

Methods

We evaluated all consecutive coronary stent implantations in Sweden during 46 months from 2008 using data from the Swedish Coronary Angiography and Angioplasty Registry (SCAAR). We used logistic regression and Cox proportional hazard modeling to estimate risk of outcomes with different balloon pressures.

Results

In total, 93 697 stents were eligible for analysis and divided into five different pressure interval groups: ≤15 atm, 16–17 atm, 18–19 atm, 20–21 atm and ≥22 atm. The risks of stent thrombosis and restenosis were significantly higher in the ≤15 atm, 18–19 atm and ≥22 atm groups (but not in the 16–17 atm group) compared to the 20–21 atm group. There were no differences in mortality. Post-dilatation was associated with a higher restenosis risk ratio (RR) of 1.22 (95% confidence interval (CI) 1.14–1.32, P<0.001) but stent thrombosis did not differ statistically between procedures with or without post-dilatation. The risk of death was lower following post-dilatation (RR 0.81 (CI 0.71–0.93) P = 0.003) and the difference compared to no post-dilatation was seen immediately after PCI.

Conclusion

Our retrospective study of stent inflation pressure identified a possible biological pattern—the risks of stent thrombosis and of restenosis appeared to be higher with low and very high pressures. Post-dilatation might increase restenosis risk.