Fusion between incompatible colonies of a viviparous ascidian, Botrylloides lentus

Abstract. The mode of allo-recognition among colonies was investigated in a viviparous ascidian, Botrylloides lentus . Each embryo is enveloped by a pouch of epithelial cells (brood pouch), and is brooded in the vascular lumen of the parental colony. That is, the parental colony tolerates the presence of semi-allogeneic conspecifics (embryos) in the vascular system. A rejection reaction occurs when incompatible colonies are brought into contact at their growing edges. The inflammatory rejection reaction is limited to a small area where the tunic of two colonies has partially fused. On the contrary, incompatible colonies fuse and their blood vessels become interconnected with one another, when they are brought into contact at artificially cut surfaces. This mode is the same as those of other viviparous species of Botrylloides, B. fuscus and B. violaceus . A relationship between viviparity and the loss of allo-recognition in the vascular system is suggested.     

Tunic phagocytes are involved in allorejection reaction in the colonial tunicate Aplidium yamazii (Polyclinidae, Ascidiacea)

The colonial ascidian Aplidium yamazii exhibited an allorejection reaction when two allogeneic colonies were brought into contact at their growing edges or at artificial cut surfaces. This species has no vascular network in the tunic, unlike the botryllid ascidians, which have a vascular network throughout the colony's common tunic. In the allorejection reaction induced by contact at the growing edges, some small, hard-packed tunic masses were formed at the contact points. Histological and electron microscopic investigation of these tunic masses revealed that they contained aggregates of tunic cells, with tunic phagocytes being the major cell type present. Some of the tunic phagocytes in these tunic masses appeared to be disintegrating. When allogeneic colonies were placed in contact at their artificial cut surfaces, the colonies partially fused, then separated. In this allorejection reaction, some loosely packed tunic masses remained in the gap between the two withdrawn colonies. These results strongly suggest that the tunic phagocytes are likely to be the major effector cells in the allorejection reaction. We also propose that the tunic phagocytes are not only the effector cells in the allorejection reaction but also bear the sites of allorecognition.     

Autoreactive blood cells and programmed cell death in growth and development of protochordates

The tunicate Botryllus is a marine protochordate whose clonal colonies undergo regulated natural transplantations when they come into contact in nature. The outcome of these transplantations (fusion or rejection) is controlled by genes of a highly polymorphic histocompatibility system that resembles in many respects the mammalian major histocompatibility complex (MHC). While fusion or rejection reactions are often completed within 24 hr after transplantation, resorption of one partner of a pair of fused semiallogeneic colonies may occur days to weeks after initial contact. The latter process is similar to the degeneration of old individuals, or zooids, that precedes maturation of each new generation of asexual buds. Here we describe comparisons of in vitro reactions of a) mixtures of cells from allogeneic animals and b) cells taken from animals at the zooid-resorption ("takeover") stage of colony development. In vitro autoreactivity of cells from resorbing colonies may reflect in vivo responses to senescent cells, which in turn may be related to allorecognition events that govern fusion or rejection between colonies.     

Colony specificity in the xenogeneic combinations among four Botrylloides species (urochordata,ascidiacea)

Xenogeneic rejection reactions were histologically examined among four compound ascidians of the genus Botrylloides; B. simodensis, B. lentus, B. fuscus and B. violaceus, to compare with the allogeneic rejections of these species. When the incompatible conspecifics were brought into contact, hemolytic rejections occurred at the point where the tunic of the two colonies was partially fused. Xenogeneic contact at their growing edges induced hemolytic rejection in some combinations (B. simodensis-B. lentus, B. lentus-B. fuscus, and B. fuscus-B. violaceus), while conspicuous reaction was not found in the other combinations. Since the hemolytic rejection requires the partial fusion of tunic, the occurrence of hemolytic rejection suggests that the tunic cuticle of the colonies does not discriminate the facing colony from conspecifics. On the other hand, whereas cut surface contact between incompatible conspecifics induced intense rejection in B. simodensis, it resulted in fusion (formation of vascular connection) even in the combination in which the growing edge contact resulted in rejection. In xenogeneic combination, the cut surface contact of colonies always resulted in an intense rejection reaction except for B. fuscus-B. violaceus in which hemolytic reactions did not occur. The absence of hemolytic rejection suggests that the effector system for rejection reaction is not activated in this combination. Activity of phenoloxidase, a key enzyme of the rejection reaction, indicates lower reactivity in B. lentus, B. fuscus and B. violaceus than that in B. simodensis.     

Allogeneic interactions in Hydractinia: is the transitory chimera beneficial?

The colonial marine hydroid, Hydractinia, exhibits four possible outcomes to allogeneic contacts: passive rejection, aggressive rejection, stable fusion and transitory fusion. In the special case of transitory fusion, Hydractinia colonies undergo tissue fusion, followed by tissue death at the original contact area, and colony separation. This type of rejection is different in several aspects from the rejection process that accompanies incompatible encounters. It has been suggested that in transitory fusion, the colonies gain immediate benefits from fusion, mainly due to size increase, without succumbing to costs associated with fusion (germ line parasitism). We report a long-term observation of repeated fusion and separation cycles in clones featuring transitory fusion that revealed a slow-down of specific growth rates following fusion, and recovery in growth rates following separation. Very rapid transfer of stained material between partners in transitory chimeras provides suggestive evidence that protection against germ line parasitism is far from being guaranteed by separation. Our data cast doubt as to whether the benefits considered for transitory fusion are sustainable and support the already made suggestion that fusion with self, rather than fusion with kin, has been the major selective force governing the evolution of allorecognition in colonial invertebrates.     

Tunic cell populations during fusion events in the colonial ascidian Didemnum vexillum (Tunicata)

We documented changes in the abundance and distribution patterns of tunic cells involved in the allorecognition response of the colonial aplousobranch Didemnum vexillum, whose zooids do not share a common vascular system. A histological examination of the fusion zone of isogeneic (CIAs) and allogeneic (CAAs) fused colony assays revealed that tunic cuticles were rapidly regenerated. The underlying tunic matrix fused readily in all assays and controls. We identified four different types of tunic cells. Phagocytic cells represented the most abundant cell type in allogeneic fusions, followed by morula cells. These cells were more abundant at the immediate fusion junction than at 120 μm or 240 μm from the junction, most likely because they mediate the allorecognition reaction. Elongated filopodial cells also were present, although only at very low abundances, and a layer of bladder cells was located immediately below the cuticle. Our results provide quantitative evidence for the involvement of tunic cells in the allorecognition response of a highly invasive ascidian.     

Effects of allogeneic contact on life-history traits of the colonial ascidian Botryllus schlosseri in Monterey Bay

The formation of chimeric colonies following allogeneic contact between benthic invertebrates may strongly affect colony fitness. Here we show that, in a field population of the colonial ascidian Botryllus schlosseri in Monterey Bay, California, more than 20% of all colonies occur in allogeneic contact with conspecifics. We experimentally assessed the effects of allogeneic contact on the following life-history traits under natural field conditions: growth, age and size at first reproduction, and egg production (fecundity). When compared with isolated colonies, and in some cohorts also with colonies that rejected allogeneic neighbors, colonies that fused with neighbors incurred reduced fitness in terms of most life-history traits measured. We propose that one of the benefits of precise allorecognition is that, in fused colonies, it limits the unit of selection to chimeric individuals composed of closely related kin.     

Self/nonself recognition in Cnidaria: contact to allogeneic tissue does not result in elimination of nonself cells in Hydra vulgaris

Although Cnidaria have no specialised immune cells, some colonial forms possess a genetic system to discriminate between self and nonself. Allorecognition is thought to protect them from fusion with genetically different individuals and to prevent germ line parasitism. Surprisingly, when grafting tissue of two species of the solitary freshwater polyp Hydra, we found within the contact zone phagocytozing epithelial cells which selectively eliminated cells from the other species (Bosch and David, 1986). This led us to speculate that Hydra, which never undergoes "natural transplantation", can differentiate between self and nonself (Bosch and David, 1986). In a previous paper (Kuznetsov et al., 2002) we described that cells which accumulate in the contact region of these interspecies grafts are apoptotic and that apoptosis is induced by impaired cell matrix contact. Thus, observations in such interspecies grafts did not give hints concerning the presence of a discriminative allorecognition system. To clarify whether this fundamental aspect of immunity is present in these phylogenetically old animals, we examined epithelial interactions between different strains of Hydra vulgaris. Here, we show that contact to allogeneic tissue does not evoke any response in terms of phagocytosis and elimination of allogeneic cells. We, therefore, question Hydra's ability to discriminate between self and nonself and propose that, in contrast to colonial cnidarians, the solitary polyp Hydra has either lost or substantially reduced this ability.     

KIN INTERACTIONS IN A COLONIAL HYDROZOAN (HYDRACTINIA SYMBIOLONGICARPUS): POPULATION STRUCTURE ON A MOBILE LANDSCAPE

Many sessile colonial organisms intensively compete with conspecifics for growing space. This competition can result in either cooperative fusion or aggressive rejection between colonies, and some species have evolved highly polymorphic genetic systems that mediate the outcome of these interactions. Here we demonstrate the potential for interactions among close kin as the basis for the evolutionary maintenance of a genetically polymorphic allorecognition system in the colonial hydroid Hydractinia symbiolongicarpus, which lives on gastropod shells occupied by hermit crabs. Fusion between hydroids in the laboratory is restricted mainly to encounters between full siblings, whereas other encounters result in aggressive rejection. Natural selection acting on the costs or benefits of fusion between colonies could be responsible for the present maintenance of such a highly specific behavioral response, but only if encounters between fusible colonies still occur in contemporary populations. The large size of these hydroid populations and the mobility of the crabs should limit the potential for interactions among closely related hydroids on the same shell. However, RAPD polymorphisms among a large sample of hydroids from a population off the coast of Massachusetts indicate that genetically similar colonies are often found together on the same shell. Some genetic distances between colonies on the same shell were low relative to genetic distances between colonies on different shells or genetic distances between known full siblings from laboratory matings. We conservatively estimate that 2–18% of co-occurring colonies may be full sibling pairs. These observations suggest that encounters between genetically similar hydroids are common, despite the mobile nature of their habitat, and these encounters may provide frequent opportunities for natural selection to influence the evolution of cooperative and agonistic behaviors and their polymorphic genetic basis.     

Model systems of invertebrate allorecognition

Nearly all colonial marine invertebrates are capable of allorecognition--the ability to distinguish between self and genetically distinct members of the same species. When two or more colonies grow into contact, they either reject each other and compete for the contested space or fuse and form a single, chimeric colony. The specificity of this response is conferred by genetic systems that restrict fusion to self and close kin. Two selective pressures, intraspecific spatial competition between whole colonies and competition between stem cells for access to the germline in fused chimeras, are thought to drive the evolution of extensive polymorphism at invertebrate allorecognition loci. After decades of study, genes controlling allorecognition have been identified in two model systems, the protochordate Botryllus schlosseri and the cnidarian Hydractinia symbiolongicarpus. In both species, allorecognition specificity is determined by highly polymorphic cell-surface molecules, encoded by the fuhc and fester genes in Botryllus, and by the alr1 and alr2 genes in Hydractinia. Here we review allorecognition phenomena in both systems, summarizing recent molecular advances, comparing and contrasting the life history traits that shape the evolution of these distinct allorecognition systems, and highlighting questions that remain open in the field.     

Genotypic variability following fusion in the invasive colonial tunicate Didemnum vexillum

Fusion to form a chimera has been documented in many marine invertebrate taxa, including poriferans, cnidarians, bryozoans, and colonial ascidians. Allogenic interactions in chimeric ascidian colonies vary widely across taxonomic groups but are poorly characterized in the invasive colonial ascidian Didemnum vexillum. The moderate level of discrimination expressed in the fusion–rejection response of D. vexillum suggests that there is some integration of cells beyond the fusion line in a chimeric colony. We tracked the shifts in representation of microsatellite alleles between fused colonies of D. vexillum to elucidate the extent of genotypic integration in fused colonies and the patterns of changes to the genotypic composition of colonies immediately following chimera formation. By genotyping colonies before and after fusion, we found that allogeneic fusion in D. vexillum may lead to genotypic changes beyond the visible fusion line. Alleles from one colony were found in multiple tissue samples in the chimera 7–10 days after fusion had occurred. In some instances, alleles that were in a single colony prior to fusion were lost following fusion. We observed multiple patterns of allelic change, including both the unidirectional transfer and reciprocal exchange of alleles between fused colonies. Our findings suggest that tissue or cells are exchanged following allogeneic fusion between colonies of D. vexillum and that the genotypic composition of chimeric colonies may be fluid.     

Allorecognition and chimerism in an invertebrate model organism

The presence of highly specific histocompatibility reactions in colonial marine invertebrates that lack adaptive immune systems (such as the sponges, cnidarians, bryozoans and ascidians) provides a unique opportunity to investigate the evolutionary roots of allorecognition and to explore whether homologous innate recognition systems exist in vertebrates. Conspecific interactions among adult animals in these groups are regulated by highly specific allorecognition systems that restrict somatic fusion to self or close kin. In Hydractinia (Cnidaria:Hydrozoa), fusion/rejection responses are controlled by two linked genetic loci. Alleles at each locus are co-dominantly inherited. Colonies fuse if they share at least one haplotype, reject if they share no haplotypes, and display transitory fusion if they share only one allele in a haplotype—a pattern that echoes natural killer cell responses in mice and humans. Allorecognition in Hydractinia and other marine invertebrates serves as a safeguard against stem cell or germline parasitism thus, limiting chimerism to closely related individuals. These animals fail to become tolerant even if exposed during early development to cells from a histoincompatible individual. Detailed analysis of the structure and function of molecules responsible for allorecognition in basal marine invertebrates could provide clues to the innate mechanisms by which higher animals respond to organ and cell allografts, including embryonic tissues.Key words: allorecognition, chimerism, invertebrate, innate immune system     

Allorecognition and chimerism in an invertebrate model organism

The presence of highly specific histocompatibility reactions in colonial marine invertebrates that lack adaptive immune systems (such as the sponges, cnidarians, bryozoans, and ascidians) provides a unique opportunity to investigate the evolutionary roots of allorecognition and to explore whether homologous innate recognition systems exist in vertebrates. Conspecific interactions among adult animals in these groups are regulated by highly specific allorecognition systems that restrict somatic fusion to self or close kin. In Hydractinia (Cnidaria:Hydrozoa), fusion/rejection responses are controlled by two linked genetic loci. Alleles at each locus are co-dominantly inherited. Colonies fuse if they share at least one haplotype, reject if they share no haplotypes, and display transitory fusion if they share only one allele in a haplotype – a pattern that echoes natural killer cell responses in mice and humans. Allorecognition in Hydractinia and other marine invertebrates serves as a safeguard against stem cell or germline parasitism thus, limiting chimerism to closely related individuals. These animals fail to become tolerant even if exposed during early development to cells from a histoincompatible individual. Detailed analysis of the structure and function of molecules responsible for allorecognition in basal marine invertebrates could provide clues to the innate mechanisms by which higher animals respond to organ and cell allografts, including embryonic tissues.     

A complex allorecognition system in a reef-building coral: delayed responses,reversals and nontransitive hierarchies

A highly polymorphic and complex allorecognition system in the coral Stylophora pistillata was revealed in the field by assaying branch pair combinations among 11 colonies (181 assays) for 24 months. Replicates of between-colony combinations exhibited consistent outcomes, in both time scale and type of response. Different allogeneic combinations exhibited one of two main outcomes, either unilateral rejection, or an array of other incompatible reactions following a state of non-fusion. These responses were partially linked with color morphs (purple dominated yellow). An additional 22 isogeneic grafts resulted in complete fusion. Unilateral rejection occurred 1–7 months following initial contact. Nonfusion usually developed into skeletal suture barriers after 3–9 months, and then into unilateral colony-specific overgrowths at 6–23 months with some reversals in direction at 18–22 months. During this process, small lesions usually developed on the tissue of the subordinate partner, which were either overgrown by the dominant partner or healed. After two years, a network of overgrowths among colonies was established with essentially hierarchial properties, but some nontransitive interactions also occurred. The colonies segregated into three distinct histocompatibility groups; within each group, colonies engaged in nonfusion. Between groups, colonies exhibited nonfusion or rejected each other in a group-specific manner. Based on the results, we discuss the terminology used for fusion versus rejection phenomena in scleractinian corals, the possible genetic background for self-nonself recognition in Stylophora, and the methodological artifacts associated with the use of short-term allorecognition assays. Correspondence to: B. Rinkevich     

Relationships among hemocytes, tunic cells, germ cells, and accessory cells in the colonial ascidian Botryllus schlosseri

Monoclonal antibodies were raised against hemocytes of the colonial ascidian Botryllus schlosseri as possible tools to study hemocyte differentiation. In this species, blood cells are involved in various biological functions, such as immunosurveillance, encapsulation of foreign bodies, metal accumulation, and allorecognition. The latter process drives the fusion or rejection of contacting colonies, according to whether they do or do not share at least one allele at the fusibility/histocompatibility (Fu/HC) locus. Hemocytes take part in the rejection reaction, which suggests that they express molecules, coded by the Fu/HC locus, on their surface. A homozygous colony at the Fu/HC locus was used to produce the antibodies, which were screened by immunocytochemistry on hemocyte monolayers, immunohistochemistry on colony paraffin sections, and immunoblotting on colony homogenates. Here, we report on one of the obtained antibodies (1D8), which recognized a surface epitope on hemocytes of the donor colony and other colonies, apparently in a manner specific to the Fu/HC genotype. It also labeled a single 80-kDa band in colony homogenates. In addition, it specifically recognized tunic cells, germ cells, and their accessory cells. These results strengthen the assumption of a close relationship among these types of cells and blood cells, and suggest a close relationship among the above cells, probably deriving from undifferentiated blood cells.     

Differential effect of allorecognition loci on phenotype in Hydractinia symbiolongicarpus (Cnidaria: Hydrozoa)

The allorecognition complex of Hydractinia symbiolongicarpus is a chromosomal interval containing two loci, alr1 and alr2, that controls fusion between genetically distinct colonies. Recombination between these two loci has been associated with a heterogeneous class of phenotypes called transitory fusion. A large-scale backcross was performed to generate a population of colonies (N = 106) with recombination breakpoints within the allorecognition complex. Two distinct forms of transitory fusion were correlated with reciprocal recombination products, suggesting that alr1 and alr2 contributed differentially to the allorecognition response. Specifically, type I transitory fusion is associated with rapid and persistent separation of allogeneic tissues, whereas type II transitory fusion generates a patchwork of continuously fusing and separating tissues.     

Xenogeneic rejection among three botryllids (compound Ascidians)

Xenogeneic rejection was observed among colonies of three botryllids, Botryllus scalaris, Botryllus primigenus, and Botrylloides simodensis. Allogeneic recognition occurs in each of these species, but the manner of allogeneic rejection differs among them. We studied xenogeneic rejection reactions among these species under the following conditions: colony contact at natural growing edges, colony contact at artificially cut surfaces, and injection of xenogeneic blood plasma into a vascular vessel. In the first two cases, xenogeneic rejection occurred only in Botryllus primigenus and Botrylloides simodensis. The features of that xenogeneic rejection were similar to those of allogeneic rejection in each of these two botryllids. Injection of xenogeneic blood plasma induced responses similar to those of allogeneic rejection in all three botryllids. It is interesting to note that colonies of Botryllus scalaris never showed any response against injected blood plasma from allogeneic incompatible colonies, unlike the responses seen in colonies of the other two botryllids under the same conditions. On the basis of these results, the relationship between allogeneic and xenogeneic rejection in botryllids is discussed.     

Allorecognition Triggers Autophagy and Subsequent Necrosis in the Cnidarian Hydractinia symbiolongicarpus

Transitory fusion is an allorecognition phenotype displayed by the colonial hydroid Hydractinia symbiolongicarpus when interacting colonies share some, but not all, loci within the allorecognition gene complex (ARC). The phenotype is characterized by an initial fusion followed by subsequent cell death resulting in separation of the two incompatible colonies. We here characterize this cell death process using scanning electron microscopy (SEM), transmission electron microscopy (TEM), and continuous in vivo digital microscopy. These techniques reveal widespread autophagy and subsequent necrosis in both colony and grafted polyp assays. Terminal deoxynucleotidyl transferase dUTP nick end labeling (TUNEL) assays and ultrastructural observations revealed no evidence of apoptosis. Pharmacological inhibition of autophagy using 3-methyladenine (3-MA) completely suppressed transitory fusion in vivo in colony assays. Rapamycin did not have a significant effect in the same assays. These results establish the hydroid allorecognition system as a novel model for the study of cell death.     

The ontogeny of allorecognition in a colonial hydroid and the fate of early established chimeras

Colonies of the marine hydroid, Hydractinia, are able to discriminate between their own tissues and those belonging to unrelated conspecifics. We have studied the ontogeny of this allorecognition system by a series of allogeneic transplantations along a developmental gradient, including two-cell-stage embryos, 8 h morulae, planula larvae and metamorphosed polyps. Allograft acceptance of incompatible tissue was observed in all embryonic and larval stages, whereas metamorphosed polyps rejected incompatible transplanted allografts. Most of the chimeras established at the two-cell-stage, although composed of two allogeneic, incompatible entities with mismatching allorecognition loci, developed normally and remained stable through metamorphosis. The results of post metamorphic transplantation assays among the chimeras and the naive ramets, suggested that both incompatible genotypes were still represented in the chimera despite the onset of alloimmune maturation. The naive colonies always rejected each other. Chimeras established from later embryonic and larval stages did not develop into adult chimeric entities, but rather separated immediately post metamorphosis. We thus show that (1) allorecognition in this species matures during metamorphosis and (2) genetically incompatible entities may coexist in one immunologically mature, chimeric soma, provided that they were grafted early enough in ontogeny.     

Experimental demonstration of the benefits of somatic fusion and the consequences for allorecognition

Allorecognition, the ability to distinguish “self” from “nonself” based on allelic differences at allorecognition loci, is common in all domains of life. Allorecognition restricts the opportunities for social parasitism, and is therefore crucial for the evolution of cooperation. However, the maintenance of allorecognition diversity provides a paradox. If allorecognition is costly relative to cooperation, common alleles will be favored. Thus, the cost of allorecognition may reduce the genetic variation upon which allorecognition crucially relies, a prediction now known as “Crozier's paradox.” We establish the relative costs of allorecognition, and their consequences for the short‐term evolution of recognition labels theoretically predicted by Crozier. We use fusion among colonies of the fungus Neurospora crassa, regulated by highly variable allorecognition genes, as an experimental model system. We demonstrate that fusion among colonies is mutually beneficial, relative to absence of fusion upon allorecognition. This benefit is due not only to absence of mutual antagonism, which occurs upon allorecognition, but also to an increase in colony size per se. We then experimentally demonstrate that the benefit of fusion selects against allorecognition diversity, as predicted by Crozier. We discuss what maintains allorecognition diversity.