Heterostyly and the possibility of its breakdown by polyploidization

Heterostyly is a genetically controlled sexual polymorphism promoting outcrossing by animal pollinators. The occurrence of heterostyly in angiosperms was investigated, and 199 genera in 28 families in 15 orders were recognized as taxa that contain heterostylous species. A correlation between the occurrence of heterostyly and ploidy level was found in some limited groups in Primulaceae and Rubiaceae. In such taxa, individuals with a lower ploidy level tended to have heterostyly and individuals with a higher ploidy level tended to have monomorphic flowers. It appears reasonable that the first step of the breakdown of heterostyly was the recombination of the supergene in a diploid heterostylous plant, and then poyploidization incidentally occurred. Polyploidization itself does not necessarily appear to have direct effects on the breakdown of heterostyly.     

The different forms of flowers – what have we learned since Darwin?

Darwin's book, The Different Forms of Flowers on Plants of the Same Species, has stimulated an extraordinary amount of original research since its publication in 1877. In his book, Darwin focused primarily on heterostylous reproductive systems in flowering plants, in which two or three reproductive morphs with reciprocal placement of anthers and stigmas occur in populations. These morphs are usually self‐incompatible and cross‐incompatible with individuals possessing the same reproductive morph. Many of the papers on heterostyly published since Forms of Flowers appeared have focused on the questions raised by Darwin about the evolution and function of heterostyly. Darwin's hypothesis that heterostyly promotes cross‐pollination between different morphs has been largely substantiated, despite the difficulties in finding the ideal experimental system to address this question. Heterostyly is now known to occur in many more plant families than at the time Forms of Flowers was published and, as expected, the heterostylous syndrome is now defined more broadly than in Darwin's time. The origin of heterostyly remains an area of active research, with hypotheses stressing either the evolution of heteromorphic self‐incompatibility as the first step in the evolution of this reproductive system or, alternatively, the evolution of the reciprocal features of floral morphology. Phylogenetic approaches, combined with studies on the physiological and molecular genetic basis of heterostyly, offer promise in helping to resolve questions about the origin of heterostyly. There is no doubt that heterostyly has evolved on multiple occasions and that self‐incompatibility associated with heterostyly is unrelated to the more common multi‐allelic self‐incompatibility systems found in monomorphic species. Further progress in understanding conditions favouring evolution of heterostyly will depend on an increased understanding of the relation between the reciprocal morphological features of the breeding system and the nature of self‐incompatibility. Almost a century and a half after the appearance of The Different Forms of Flowers on Plants of the Same Species, heterostyly remains an active area of research. © 2009 The Linnean Society of London, Botanical Journal of the Linnean Society, 2009, 160 , 249–261.     

Rapid floral senescence following male function and breeding systems of some tropical orchids

No comparative study of floral senescence following male function among a range of tropical orchid genera has previously been undertaken. The timing and pattern of floral senescence and occurrence of fruit formation were studied following self-, geitonogamous and cross-pollination in 14 epiphytic and two terrestrial orchid species to determine their breeding system and assess the occurrence of floral abscission following pollinaria removal. Both pollination and pollinaria removal caused rapid floral senescence, and the pattern and timing of the floral changes were the same in all treatments. Six Dendrobium species and Pelatantheria insectifera were self-incompatible (SI) and eight other species, including one terrestrial species, were self-compatible (SC). Capsules produced from outcrossing in four SC species, Phalaenopsis cornu-cervi, Eria pubescens, Cleisostoma appendiculatum and Arundina graminifolia, were larger and heavier than those produced after selfing. Reductions in flower life span following pollinaria removal were positively correlated with flower size and longevity of unpollinated flowers but not with position in the inflorescence or nature of the breeding system. Rapid flower senescence following pollinaria removal reported here suggests that it may be widespread in tropical species. The significant association of the response with size of flowers and inflorescences among the species studied suggests that the cost of flower maintenance outweighs the benefit of remaining open for female function after pollinaria have been removed. Both SC and SI species were found among tropical orchids, but variation in capsule size following self- and cross-pollination indicates that there may be a reduction in seed production following selfing, even in SC species, and that fruit formation alone should not be taken as reliable evidence of full self-compatibility.     

SMALL AND UGLY? PHYLOGENETIC ANALYSES OF THE “SELFING SYNDROME” REVEAL COMPLEX EVOLUTIONARY FATES OF MONOMORPHIC PRIMROSE FLOWERS

One of the most common trends in plant evolution, loss of self‐incompatibility and ensuing increases in selfing, is generally assumed to be associated with a suite of phenotypic changes, notably a reduction of floral size, termed the selfing syndrome. We investigate whether floral morphological traits indeed decrease in a deterministic fashion after losses of self‐incompatibility, as traditionally expected, using a phylogeny of 124 primrose species containing nine independent transitions from heterostyly (heteromorphic incompatibility) to homostyly (monomorphic self‐compatibility), a classic system for evolution of selfing. We find similar overall variability of homostylous and heterostylous species, except for diminished herkogamy in homostyles. Bayesian mixed models demonstrate differences between homostylous and heterostylous species in all traits, but net effects across species are small (except herkogamy) and directionality differs among traits. Strongly drift‐like evolutionary trajectories of corolla tube length and corolla diameter inferred by Ornstein–Uhlenbeck models contrast with expected deterministic trajectories toward small floral size. Lineage‐specific population genetic effects associated with evolution of selfing may explain that reductions of floral size represent one of several possible outcomes of floral evolution after loss of heterostyly in primroses. Contrary to the traditional paradigm, selfing syndromes may, but do not necessarily evolve in response to increased selfing.