Membrane Fusion

The fusion of biological membranes results in two bilayer-based membranes merging into a single membrane. In this process the lipids have to undergo considerable rearrangement. The nature of the intermediates that are formed during this rearrangement has been investigated. Certain fusion proteins facilitate this process. In many cases short segments of these fusion proteins have a particularly important role in accelerating the fusion process. Studies of the interaction of model peptides with membranes have allowed for increased understanding at the molecular level of the mechanism of the promotion of membrane fusion by fusion proteins. There is an increased appreciation of the roles of several independent segments of fusion proteins in promoting the fusion process.Many of the studies of the fusion of biological membranes have been done with the fusion of enveloped viruses with other membranes. One reason for this is that the number of proteins involved in viral fusion is relatively simple, often requiring only a single protein. For many enveloped viruses, the structure of their fusion proteins has certain common elements, suggesting that they all promote fusion by an analogous mechanism. Some aspects of this mechanism also appears to be common to intracellular fusion, although several proteins are involved in that process which is more complex and regulated than is fusion.     

The Role of the Transmembrane and of the Intraviral Domain of Glycoproteins in Membrane Fusion of Enveloped Viruses

Fusion of enveloped viruses with their target membrane is mediated by viral integral glycoproteins. A conformational change of their ectodomain triggers membrane fusion. Several studies suggest that an extended, triple-stranded rod-shaped -helical coiled coil resembles a common structural and functional motif of the ectodomain of fusion proteins. From that, it is believed that essential features of the fusion process are conserved among the various enveloped viruses. However, this has not been established so far for the highly conserved transmembrane and intraviral sequences of fusion proteins. The article will focus on the role of both sequences in the fusion process. Recent studies from various enveloped viruses strongly imply that a transmembrane domain with a minimum length is required for later steps of membrane fusion, i.e., the formation and enlargement of the aqueous fusion pore. Although no specific sequence of the TM is necessary for pore formation, distinct properties and motifs of the domain may be obligatory to ascertain full fusion activity. However, with some exceptions, the intraviral domain seems to be not required for fusion activity of viral fusion proteins.     

Common Properties of Fusion Peptides from Diverse Systems

Although membrane fusion occurs ubiquitously and continuously in alleukaroytic cells, little is known about the mechanism that governs lipidbilayer fusion associated with any intracellular fusion reactions. Recentstudies of the fusion of enveloped viruses with host cell membranes havehelped to define the fusion process. The identification and characterizationof key proteins involved in fusion reactions have mainly driven recent advancesin our understanding of membrane fusion. The most important denominator amongthe fusion proteins is the fusion peptide. In this review, work done in thelast few years on the molecular mechanism of viral membrane fusion will behighlighted, focusing in particular on the role of the fusion peptide and themodification of the lipid bilayer structure. Much of what is known regardingthe molecular mechanism of viral membrane fusion has been gained using liposomesas model systems in which the molecular components of the membrane and the environmentare strictly controlled. Many amphilphilic peptides have a high affinity forlipid bilayers, but only a few sequences are able to induce membrane fusion. Thepresence of -helical structure in at least part of the fusion peptideis strongly correlated with activity whereas, -structure tends to beless prevalent, associated with non-native experimental conditions, and morerelated to vesicle aggregation than fusion. The specific angle of insertionof the peptides into the membrane plane is also found to be an importantcharacteristic for the fusion process. A shallow penetration, extending onlyto the central aliphatic core region, is likely responsible for the destabilization ofthe lipids required for coalescence of the apposing membranes and fusion.     

Fusion peptides and the mechanism of viral fusion

Segments of viral fusion proteins play an important role in viral fusion. They are defined by a number of criteria, including the sensitivity of this region of the viral fusion protein to loss of function as a consequence of mutation. In addition, small model peptides designed to mimic this segment of viral fusion proteins often have some membrane perturbing activity. The properties of viral fusion peptides are quite varied. Many are found at the amino terminus of viral fusion proteins. As isolated peptides, they have been found to form both α-helical as well as β-structure. In addition, some viruses have internal fusion peptides. Just as there are several structural motifs for viral fusion peptides, there are also several mechanisms by which they accelerate the process of membrane fusion. These include the promotion of negative curvature, lowering the rupture tension of the lipid monolayer, acting as an anchor to join the fusion membranes, transmitting a force to the membrane or imparting energy to the system by other means. It is not likely that the fusion peptide can fulfill all of these diverse roles and future studies will elucidate which of these mechanisms is most important for the action of individual viral fusion peptides.     

Peptide models for the membrane destabilizing actions of viral fusion proteins.

The fusion of enveloped viruses to target membranes is promoted by certain viral fusion proteins. However, many other proteins and peptides stabilize bilayer membranes and inhibit membrane fusion. We have evaluated some characteristics of the interaction of peptides that are models of segments of measles and influenza fusion proteins with membranes. Our results indicate that these models of the fusogenic domains of viral fusion proteins promote conversion of model membrane bilayers to nonbilayer phases. This is opposite to the effects of peptides and proteins that inhibit viral fusion. A peptide model for the fusion segment of the HA protein of influenza increased membrane leakage as well as promoted the formation of nonbilayer phases upon acidification from pH 7-5. We analyze the gross conformational features of the peptides, and speculate on how these conformational features relate to the structures of the intact proteins and to their role in promoting membrane fusion.     

Membrane fusion of enveloped viruses: Especially a matter of proteins

To infect mammalian cells, enveloped viruses have to deposit their nucleocapsids into the cytoplasm of a host cell. Membrane fusion represents a key element in this entry mechanism. The fusion activity resides in specific, virally encoded membrane glycoproteins. Some molecular properties of these fusion proteins will be briefly described. These properties will then be correlated to the ability of a virus to fuse with target membranes, and to induce cell-cell fusion. Some molecular and physical parameters affecting virus fusion—at the level of either viral or target membrane or both—and the significance of modelling virus fusion by using synthetic peptides resembling viral fusion peptides, will also be discussed.     

Interactions of Primary Amphipathic Vector Peptides with Membranes. Conformational Consequences and Influence on Cellular Localization

The conformations of two peptides produced by the combinations of a nuclear localization sequence and a sequence issued from the fusion protein gp41 of HIV 1 have been analyzed both in solution and in membranes or in membrane mimicking environments. Both are shown to be nonordered in water, α-helical when incorporated into SDS micelles where the helical domain concerns the hydrophobic part of the peptides. Interactions with lipids induce the formation of β-sheet and the lipid-peptide interactions are governed by the nature of the lipid polar headgroups. A monolayer study shows that replacement of the sequence separating the two sequences with an arginine favors the lipid-peptide interactions which may contribute to the understanding of the different, nuclear and membrane associated, cellular localizations of the peptides. Received: 10 October 1997/Revised: 15 January 1998     

Role of lipids in virus replication

Viruses intricately interact with and modulate cellular membranes at several stages of their replication, but much less is known about the role of viral lipids compared to proteins and nucleic acids. All animal viruses have to cross membranes for cell entry and exit, which occurs by membrane fusion (in enveloped viruses), by transient local disruption of membrane integrity, or by cell lysis. Furthermore, many viruses interact with cellular membrane compartments during their replication and often induce cytoplasmic membrane structures, in which genome replication and assembly occurs. Recent studies revealed details of membrane interaction, membrane bending, fission, and fusion for a number of viruses and unraveled the lipid composition of raft-dependent and -independent viruses. Alterations of membrane lipid composition can block viral release and entry, and certain lipids act as fusion inhibitors, suggesting a potential as antiviral drugs. Here, we review viral interactions with cellular membranes important for virus entry, cytoplasmic genome replication, and virus egress.     

Characterization of fusion determinants points to the involvement of three discrete regions of both E1 and E2 glycoproteins in the membrane fusion process of hepatitis C virus

Infection of eukaryotic cells by enveloped viruses requires the merging of viral and cellular membranes. Highly specific viral surface glycoproteins, named fusion proteins, catalyze this reaction by overcoming inherent energy barriers. Hepatitis C virus (HCV) is an enveloped virus that belongs to the genus Hepacivirus of the family Flaviviridae. Little is known about the molecular events that mediate cell entry and membrane fusion for HCV, although significant progress has been made due to recent developments in infection assays. Here, using infectious HCV pseudoparticles (HCVpp), we investigated the molecular basis of HCV membrane fusion. By searching for classical features of fusion peptides through the alignment of sequences from various HCV genotypes, we identified six regions of HCV E1 and E2 glycoproteins that present such characteristics. We introduced conserved and nonconserved amino acid substitutions in these regions and analyzed the phenotype of HCVpp generated with mutant E1E2 glycoproteins. This was achieved by (i) quantifying the infectivity of the pseudoparticles, (ii) studying the incorporation of E1E2 and their capacity to mediate receptor binding, and (iii) determining their fusion capacity in cell-cell and liposome/HCVpp fusion assays. We propose that at least three of these regions (i.e., at positions 270 to 284, 416 to 430, and 600 to 620) play a role in the membrane fusion process. These regions may contribute to the merging of viral and cellular membranes either by interacting directly with lipid membranes or by assisting the fusion process through their involvement in the conformational changes of the E1E2 complex at low pH.     

Mechanisms of cell entry by influenza virus

A wide range of viruses, including many human and animal pathogens representing various taxonomic groups, contain genomes that are enclosed in lipid envelopes. These envelopes are generally acquired in the final stages of assembly, as viruses bud from regions of the membrane of the infected cell at which virally encoded membrane proteins have accumulated. The viruses procure their membranes during this process and mature particles 'pinch off' from the cellular membranes. Under most circumstances, initiation of another round of infection is dependent on two critical functions supplied by the envelope proteins. The virus must bind to cell-surface receptors of a new host cell, and fusion of the viral and cellular membranes must occur to transfer the viral genome into the cell. Enveloped viruses have evolved a variety of mechanisms to execute these two basic functions. Owing to their relative simplicity, studies of binding and fusion using enveloped viruses and their components have contributed significantly to the overall understanding of receptor-ligand interactions and membrane fusion processes - fundamental activities involved in a plethora of biological functions.     

Structures and Mechanisms of Viral Membrane Fusion Proteins: Multiple Variations on a Common Theme

Recent work has identified three distinct classes of viral membrane fusion proteins based on structural criteria. In addition, there are at least four distinct mechanisms by which viral fusion proteins can be triggered to undergo fusion-inducing conformational changes. Viral fusion proteins also contain different types of fusion peptides and vary in their reliance on accessory proteins. These differing features combine to yield a rich diversity of fusion proteins. Yet despite this staggering diversity, all characterized viral fusion proteins convert from a fusion-competent state (dimers or trimers, depending on the class) to a membrane-embedded homotrimeric prehairpin, and then to a trimer-of-hairpins that brings the fusion peptide, attached to the target membrane, and the transmembrane domain, attached to the viral membrane, into close proximity thereby facilitating the union of viral and target membranes. During these conformational conversions, the fusion proteins induce membranes to progress through stages of close apposition, hemifusion, and then the formation of small, and finally large, fusion pores. Clearly, highly divergent proteins have converged on the same overall strategy to mediate fusion, an essential step in the life cycle of every enveloped virus.     

A Glycoprotein from Rat Liver Endoplasmic Reticulum Promotes Both Aggregation and Fusion of Liposomes at Acidic pH

Low-pH-induced fusion of liposomes with rat liver endoplasmic reticulum was evidenced. Fusion was inactivated by treatment of microsomes with trypsin or EEDQ (N-ethoxycarbonyl-2-ethoxy-1,2-dihydroquinoline), indicating the involvement of a protein. The protein was purified 555-fold by chromatographic steps. The identification and purification to homogeneity was obtained by electroelution from a slab gel, which gave a still active protein of about 50 kDa. The protein promoted the fusion of liposomes; laser light scattering showed an increase of mean radius of vesicles from 60 up to about 340 nm. Fusion was studied as mass action kinetics, describing the overall fusion as a two-step sequence of a second order aggregation followed by a first order fusion of liposomes. For phosphatidylcholine containing liposomes aggregation was not rate-limiting at pH 5.0 and fusion followed first order kinetics with a rate constant of 13 · 10⁻³ sec⁻¹. For phosphatidylethanolamine/phosphatidic acid liposomes aggregation was rate-limiting; however, the overall fusion was first order process, suggesting that fusogenic protein influences both aggregation and fusion of liposomes. The protein binds to the lipid bilayer of liposomes, independently of pH, probably by a hydrophobic segment. Exposed carboxylic groups might be able to trigger pH-dependent aggregation and fusion. It is proposed that the protein inserted in the lipid bilayer bridges with an adjacent liposome forming a fused doublet. Since at endoplasmic reticulum level proton pumps are operating to generate a low-pH environment, the membrane bound fusogenic protein may be responsible for both aggregation and fusion of neighboring membranes and therefore could operate in the exchange of lipidic material between intracellular membranes. Received: 25 August 1997/Revised: 28 April 1998     

New insights into the mechanism of virus-induced membrane fusion

Infection by enveloped viruses requires fusion between the viral and cellular membranes, a process mediated by specific viral envelope glycoproteins. Information from studies with whole viruses, as well as protein dissection, has suggested that the fusion glycoprotein (F) from Paramyxoviridae, a family that includes major human pathogens, has two hydrophobic segments, termed fusion peptides. These peptides are directly responsible for the membrane fusion event. The recently determined three-dimensional structure of the pre-fusion conformation of the F protein supported these predictions and enabled the formulation of: (1) a detailed model for the initial interaction between F and the target membrane, (2) a new model for Paramyxovirus-induced membrane fusion that can be extended to other viral families, and (3) a novel strategy for developing better inhibitors of paramyxovirus infection.     

Functional Domains within Fusion Proteins: Prospectives for Development of Peptide Inhibitors of Viral Cell Fusion

The entry of enveloped viruses into host cells is accomplished by fusion ofthe viral envelope and target plasma membrane and is mediated by fusionproteins. Recently, several functional domains within fusion proteins fromdifferent viral families were identified. Some are directly involved inconformational changes after receptor binding, as suggested by the recentrelease of crystallographically determined structures of a highly stablecore structure of the fusion proteins in the absence of membranes. However,in the presence of membranes, this core binds strongly to the membrane'ssurface and dissociates therein. Other regions, besides the N-terminal fusionpeptide, which include the core region and an internal fusion peptide inparamyxoviruses, are directly involved in the actual membrane fusion event,suggesting an umbrella like model for the membrane inducedconformational change of fusion proteins. Peptides resembling these regionshave been shown to have specific antiviral activity, presumably because theyinterfere with the corresponding domains within the viruses. Overall, thesestudies shed light into the molecular mechanism of membrane fusion induced byenvelope glycoproteins and suggest that fusion proteins from different viralfamilies share common structural and functional motifs.     

Membrane Fusion and Rupture in Liposomes: Effect of Biodegradable pH-Sensitive Surfactants

Biodegradable pH-sensitive surfactants (BPS) are a unique family of easily metabolized compounds that demonstrate pH-dependent surface activity. These agents, in combination with other delivery systems, have demonstrated effects in enhancing transnucleic acid activity. The increased activity has been hypothesized to occur from a release of endosomal contents. Simply, the BPS delivery system containing nucleic acids enters the cell through an endocytotoic process. It encounters an acidic pH and becomes surface active leading to defects in the endosomal membrane. In the current study, an in vitro model membrane was used to better understand the liposome defect mechanisms that BPS elicit. Using this system, it is shown that BPS can induce both liposome fusion and rupture depending upon the pH and mole ratio of BPS to membrane lipids. Futhermore, liposome fusion induced by BPS was dependent on the total numbers of liposome particles while rupture was independent of interacting liposome particles. The generated data indicate that BPS agents act differently from other typical surface active agents and fuosgenic compounds. Instead of facilitating membrane fusion through the hexagonal II phase, BPS appeared to contribute and participate in the membrane fusion at different stages. Received: 18 February 1998/Revised: 14 July 1998     

Fusion of Human Sperm to Prostasomes at Acidic pH

Prostasomes are membranous vesicles (150–200 nm diameter) present in human semen. They are secreted by the prostate and contain large amounts of cholesterol, sphingomyelin and Ca²⁺. In addition, some of their proteins are enzymes. Prostasomes enhance the motility of ejaculated spermatozoa and are involved in a number of additional biological functions. The possibility that they may fuse to sperm has never been proved. In this work, we studied the fusion of sperm to prostasomes by using various methods (relief of octadecyl Rhodamine B fluorescence self-quenching, fluorescence microscopy and flow cytometry) and we found that it occurs at acidic pH (4–5), but not at pH 7.5 pH-dependent fusion relies on the integrity of one or more proteins and is different from the Ca²⁺-stimulated fusion between rat liver liposomes and spermatozoa that does not require any protein and occurs at neutral pH. We think that the H⁺-dependent fusion of prostasomes to sperm may have physiological importance by modifying the lipid and protein pattern of sperm membranes. Received: 19 June 1996/Revised: 4 September 1996     

Structural and functional properties of an unusual internal fusion peptide in a nonenveloped virus membrane fusion protein

The avian and Nelson Bay reoviruses are two of only a limited number of nonenveloped viruses capable of inducing cell-cell membrane fusion. These viruses encode the smallest known membrane fusion proteins (p10). We now show that a region of moderate hydrophobicity we call the hydrophobic patch (HP), present in the small N-terminal ectodomain of p10, shares the following characteristics with the fusion peptides of enveloped virus fusion proteins: (i) an abundance of glycine and alanine residues, (ii) a potential amphipathic secondary structure, (iii) membrane-seeking characteristics that correspond to the degree of hydrophobicity, and (iv) the ability to induce lipid mixing in a liposome fusion assay. The p10 HP is therefore predicted to provide a function in the mechanism of membrane fusion similar to those of the fusion peptides of enveloped virus fusion peptides, namely, association with and destabilization of opposing lipid bilayers. Mutational and biophysical analysis suggested that the internal fusion peptide of p10 lacks alpha-helical content and exists as a disulfide-stabilized loop structure. Similar kinked structures have been reported in the fusion peptides of several enveloped virus fusion proteins. The preservation of a predicted loop structure in the fusion peptide of this unusual nonenveloped virus membrane fusion protein supports an imperative role for a kinked fusion peptide motif in biological membrane fusion.     

The Role of Membrane Lateral Tension in Calcium-Induced Membrane Fusion

Calcium-induced fusion of liposomes was studied with a view to understand the role of membrane tension in this process. Lipid mixing due to fusion was monitored by following fluorescence of rhodamine-phosphatidyl-ethanolamine incorporated into liposomal membrane at a self-quenching concentration. The extent of lipid mixing was found to depend on the rate of calcium addition: at slow rates it was significantly lower than when calcium was injected instantly. The vesicle inner volume was then made accessible to external calcium by adding calcium ionophore A23187. No effect on fusion was observed at high rates of calcium addition while at slow rates lipid mixing was eliminated. Fusion of labeled vesicles with a planar phospholipid membrane (BLM) was studied using fluorescence microscopy. Above a threshold concentration specific for each ion, Ca²⁺, Mg²⁺, Cd²⁺ and La³⁺ induce fusion of both charged and neutral membranes. The threshold calcium concentration required for fusion was found to be dependent on the vesicle charge, but not on the BLM charge. Pretreatment of vesicles with ionophore and calcium inhibited vesicle fusion with BLM. This effect was reversible: chelation of calcium prior to the application of vesicle to BLM completely restored their ability to fuse. These results support the hypothesis that tension in the outer monolayer of lipid vesicle is a primary reason for membrane destabilization promoting membrane fusion. How this may be a common mechanism for both purely lipidic and protein-mediated membrane fusion is discussed. Received: 27 September 1999/Revised: 22 March 2000     

Structural characterization of mumps virus fusion protein core

The fusion proteins of enveloped viruses mediating the fusion between the viral and cellular membranes comprise two discontinuous heptad repeat (HR) domains located at the ectodomain of the enveloped glycoproteins. The crystal structure of the fusion protein core of Mumps virus (MuV) was determined at 2.2 A resolution. The complex is a six-helix bundle in which three HR1 peptides form a central highly hydrophobic coiled-coil and three HR2 peptides pack against the hydrophobic grooves on the surface of central coiled-coil in an oblique antiparallel manner. Fusion core of MuV, like those of simian virus 5 and human respiratory syncytium virus, forms typical 3-4-4-4-3 spacing. The similar characterization in HR1 regions, as well as the existence of O-X-O motif in extended regions of HR2 helix, suggests a basic rule for the formation of the fusion core of viral fusion proteins.     

Directly Observed Membrane Fusion Between Oppositely Charged Phospholipid Bilayers

A novel method was developed for the direct examination of pairwise encounters between positively and negatively charged phospholipid bilayer vesicles. Giant bilayer vesicles (unilamellar, 4–20 μm in diameter) prepared from 1,2-dioleoyl-sn-glycero-3-ethylphosphocholine, a new cationic phospholipid derivative, were electrophoretically maneuvered into contact with individual anionic phospholipid vesicles. Fluorescence video microscopy revealed that such vesicles commonly underwent fusion within milliseconds (1 video field) after contact, without leakage. Fusion occurred at constant volume and, since flaccid vesicles were rare, the excess membrane was not available after fusion. Hemifusion (the outer monolayers of each vesicle fused while the inner monolayers remained intact) was inferred from membrane-bound dye transfer and a change in the contact area. Hemifusion was observed as a final stable state and as an intermediate to fusion of vesicles composed of charged phospholipids plus zwitterionic phospholipids. Hemifusion occurred in one of three ways following adhesion: either delayed with an abrupt increase in area of contact, immediately with a gradual increase in area of contact, or with retraction during which adherent vesicles dissociated from a flat contact to a point contact. Phosphatidylethanolamine strongly promoted immediate hemifusion; the resultant hemifused state was stable and seldom underwent complete fusion. Although sometimes single contacts between vesicles led to rupture of both, in other cases, a single vesicle underwent multiple fusion events. Direct observation has unequivocally demonstrated the fusion of two, isolated bilayer-bounded bodies to yield a stable, non-leaky product, as occurs in cells, in the absence of proteins. Received: 25 November 1998/Revised: 23 March 1999