Phylogenetic analysis of Staphyliniformia (Coleoptera) based on characters of larvae and adults

Abstract. One hundred and twenty-one morphological characters of larvae and adults of the series Staphyliniformia were scored (multistate coding) and analysed to determine the family group relationships of the polyphagan groups Scarabaeoidea, Histeroidea, Hydrophiloidea and Staphylinoidea. Cladograms were rooted with exemplars of Adephaga, Archostemata, Myxophaga and the polyphagan families Dascillidae, Derodontidae, Eucinetidae and Scirtidae. Analyses of the same dataset with multistate characters re-coded as presence/absence (144 characters) produced cladograms that were similar to those produced from analyses of the original characters. Cladograms produced from partitioned larval and adult characters differed strongly, with adult-only trees more similar to those produced by combined data. The results confirm the monophyly of Hydrophiloidea + Histeroidea and of Staphylinoidea (including Hydraenidae). The Epimetopidae + Georissidae are the only strongly supported clade within Hydrophiloidea. A clade comprising Hydrochidae, Spercheidae and Hydrophilidae, and a sister-group relationship between the latter two families were confirmed in analyses of the data with presence/absence coding. Helophoridae, Epimetopidae and Georissidae are probably not a monophyletic unit, and additional evidence is needed for a reliable placement of Helophoridae. Scarabaeoidea are placed as a sister taxon of Hydrophiloidea + Histeroidea, but support for this relationship is weak. The branching pattern ((Hydraenidae + Ptiliidae) + (Leiodidae + Agyrtidae)), and a clade comprising Scydmaenidae, Silphidae and Staphylinidae (= ‘staphylinid group’) are well founded. The branching pattern (Orchymontiinae + (Prosthetopinae + (Ochthebiinae + Hydraeninae))) within Hydraenidae is confirmed. Poor resolution at the base of the trees and the placement of some nonstaphyliniform taxa (Dascillidae, Derodontidae, Scirtidae and Eucinetidae) as a sister group to a clade comprising Scarabaeoidea, Hydrophiloidea and Histeroidea suggests that Staphyliniformia may be paraphyletic. It is recommended that series names are eliminated from the classification of Polyphaga, at least for the more ‘primitive’ groups.     

Interrelationships of Staphyliniform groups inferred from 18S and 28S rDNA sequences, with special emphasis on Hydrophiloidea (Coleoptera, Staphyliniformia)

The series Staphyliniformia is one of the mega‐diverse groups of Coleoptera, but the relationships among the main families are still poorly understood. In this paper we address the interrelationships of staphyliniform groups, with special emphasis on Hydrophiloidea and Hydraenidae, based on partial sequences of the ribosomal genes 18S rDNA and 28S rDNA. Sequence data were analysed with parsimony and Bayesian posterior probabilities, in an attempt to overcome the likely effect of some branches longer than the 95% cumulative probability of the estimated normal distribution of the path lengths of the species. The inter‐family relationships in the trees obtained with both methods were in general poorly supported, although most of the results based on the sequence data are in good agreement with morphological studies. In none of our analyses a close relationship between Hydraenidae and Hydrophiloidea was supported, contrary to the traditional view but in agreement with recent morphological investigations. Hydraenidae form a clade with Ptiliidae and Scydmaenidae in the tree obtained with Bayesian probabilities, but are placed as basal group of Staphyliniformia (with Silphidae as subordinate group) in the parsimony tree. Based on the analysed data with a limited set of outgroups Scarabaeoidea are nested within Staphyliniformia. However, this needs further support. Hydrophiloidea s.str., Sphaeridiinae, Histeroidea (Histeridae + Sphaeritidae), and all staphylinoid families included are confirmed as monophyletic, with the exception of Hydraenidae in the parsimony tree. Spercheidae are not a basal group within Hydrophiloidea, as has been previously suggested, but included in a polytomy with other Hydrophilidae in the Bayesian analyses, or its sistergroup (with the inclusion of Epimetopidae) in the parsimony tree. Helophorus is placed at the base of Hydrophiloidea in the parsimony tree. The monophyly of Hydrophiloidea s.l. (including the histeroid families) and Staphylinoidea could not be confirmed by the analysed data. Some results, such as a placement of Silphidae as subordinate group of Hydraenidae (parsimony tree), or a sistergroup relationship between Ptiliidae and Scydmaenidae, appear unlikely from a morphological point of view.     

On the Head Morphology and Systematic Position of Helophorus (Coleoptera: Hydrophiloidea: Helophoridae)

External and internal features of the head of adults of Helophorus spp. were examined and described in detail. The 6 species under consideration show very little morphological variation. The only distinctive characters, which characterise groups of species, are the presence or absence of the mandibular retinaculum and the symmetric or asymmetric shape of the ultimate maxillary palpomere. Helophoridae is supported by several autapomorphies, e.g. a group of long hairs on the posterodorsal margin of galeomere II and the distinctly serrate hind margin of the right mola. Characters with a potential phylogenetic relevance are listed, presented as a data matrix and analysed cladistically. The monophyly of Hydrophiloidea + Histeroidea, Hydrophiloidea (excl. Hydraenidae), ((Helophoridae + Hydrochidae) + (Georissidae [+ Epimetopidae?])), Hydrophilidae and Sphaeridiinae was supported in all trees. The position of Spercheus remains ambiguous. It is either the sistergroup of the remaining Hydrophiloidea or of Hydrophilidae. Head structures of adults of Helophoridae and Hydrochidae show a remarkable similarity. The following apomorphic character states are shared by both taxa: dorsal side of labrum divided into 2 areas with different surface structure, mentum with 2 longitudinal ridges. A clade comprising these 2 families + Georissidae (and probably Epimetopidae) is supported by the metallic granulation of the dorsal side of the head capsule and a grooved frontoclypeal suture. The presence of tubular mandibular glands may be a derived groundplan feature of Hydrophiloidea + Histeroidea. The proposed interrelationships are partly in contrast to current hypothesis. The hypothesised character evolution may change, if a more extensive set of taxa (e.g. Horelophinae, Horelophopsinae) and characters, especially larval features are used (e.g. stigmatic atrium). Several derived characteristics of the clades listed above may have been secondarily lost in Hydrophilidae.     

Phylogeny and evolution of Staphyliniformia and Scarabaeiformia: forest litter as a stepping stone for diversification of nonphytophagous beetles

The beetle series Staphyliniformia exhibits extraordinary taxonomic, ecological and morphological diversity. To gain further insight into staphyliniform relationships and evolution, we reconstructed the phylogeny of Staphyliniformia using DNA sequences from nuclear 28S rDNA and the nuclear protein‐coding gene CAD for 282 species representing all living families and most subfamilies, a representative sample of Scarabaeiformia serving as a near outgroup, and three additional beetles as more distant outgroups. Under both Bayesian inference (BI) and maximum likelihood inference (MLI), the major taxa within Staphyliniformia are each monophyletic: (i) Staphylinoidea, (ii) Hydrophiloidea s.l., and the contained superfamilies (iii) Hydrophiloidea s.s. and (iv) Histeroidea, although Staphylinoidea and Hydrophiloidea s.l. are not strongly supported by MLI bootstrap. Scarabaeiformia is monophyletic under both methods of phylogenetic inference. However, the relative relationships of Staphylinoidea, Hydrophiloidea s.l. and Scarabaeiformia differ between BI and MLI: under BI, Staphyliniformia and Scarabaeiformia were sister groups; under MLI, Hydrophiloidea s.l. and Scarabaeiformia were sister groups and these together were sister to Staphylinoidea. The internal relationships in Scarabaeiformia were similar under both methods of phylogenetic inference, with Cetoniinae, Dynastinae + Rutelinae, Hybosoridae, Passalidae, Scarabaeidae and Scarabaeinae recovered as monophyla. Histeridae comprised two major clades: (1) Abraeinae, Trypanaeine and Trypeticinae; and (2) Chlamydopsinae, Dendrophilinae, Haeteriinae, Histerinae, Onthophilinae, Saprininae and Tribalinae. The relationships among early‐divergent Hydrophiloidea differed between BI and MLI, and overall were unresolved or received only moderate to low nodal support. The staphylinoid families Agyrtidae, Hydraenidae and Ptiliidae were recovered as monophyletic; the latter two were sister taxa, and Staphylinidae + Silphidae was also monophyletic. Silphidae was placed within Staphylinidae in close relation to a subset of Tachyporinae. Pselaphinae and Scydmaeninae were both recovered within Staphylinidae, in accordance with recent analyses of morphological characters, although not always with recently proposed sister taxa. None of the four major groups of Staphylinidae proposed by Lawrence and Newton (1982) was recovered as monophyletic. Certain highly specialized staphyliniform habits and morphologies, such as abdominal defensive glands and reduced elytra, have arisen in parallel in separate lineages. Further, our analyses support two major transitions to an aquatic lifestyle within Staphyliniformia: once within Staphylinoidea (Hydraenidae), and once within Hydrophiloidea s.l. (Hydrophiloidea s.s.). On a smaller scale, the most common transition is from litter to subcortical or to periaquatic microhabitats and the next most common is from litter to carrion and to fungi. Overall, transitions to periaquatic microhabitats were the most numerous. The broad picture in Staphyliniformia seems to be a high level of evolutionary plasticity, with multiple possible pathways to and from many microhabitat associations, and litter as a major source microhabitat for diversification. In Scarabaeiformia, the most common transitions were from litter to foliage, with flowers to litter, litter to flowers, and litter to dung being next, and then litter to roots, logs or carrion. Litter is again the largest overall source microhabitat. The most common transitions were to foliage and flowers. It thus seems that the litter environment presents ecological and evolutionary opportunities/challenges that facilitate entry of Staphyliniformia and Scarabaeiformia into ‘new’ and different ecological adaptive zones.     

From terrestrial to aquatic habitats and back again — molecular insights into the evolution and phylogeny of Hydrophiloidea (Coleoptera) using multigene analyses

The phylogenetic relationships within Hydrophiloidea have been a matter of controversial discussion for many years and the supposedly repeated changes between aquatic and terrestrial lifestyles are not well understood. In order to address these issues we used an extensive molecular data set comprising sequences from six nuclear and mitochondrial genes. The analyses accomplished with the entire data set resulted in largely congruent tree topologies concerning the main branches, independent from the analytical procedures. However, only Bayesian analyses yielded sufficient high posterior probabilities, whereas bootstrap support values for most nodes were generally low. Our results are only partially congruent with hypotheses based on morphological analyses. Spercheidae were placed as the sister group of the remaining hydrophiloid subgroups. Hydrophiloidea excluding Spercheidae split into two clades: the 'helophorid lineage' comprising the small groups Epimetopidae, Hydrochidae, Georissidae and Helophoridae, and the largest family, Hydrophilidae. Within Hydrophilidae, Hydrophilinae do not form a monophylum. The predominantly terrestrial Sphaeridiinae were placed as a subordinate clade within this subfamily. Furthermore, our data suggest a single origin of the aquatic lifestyle in Hydrophiloidea, with numerous secondary changes to terrestrial habits and tertiary changes to aquatic habitats within Sphaeridiinae.     

A phylogenetic analysis of the orb-weaving spider family Araneidae (Arachnida, Araneae)

We present the first cladistic analysis focused at the tribal and subfamily level of the orb-weaving spider family Araneidae. The data matrix of 82 characters scored for 57 arancid genera of 6 subfamilies and 19 tribes (and 13 genera from 8 outgroup families) resulted in 16 slightly different, most parsimonious trees. Successive weighting corroborated 62 of the 66 informative nodes on these cladograms; one is recommended as the 'working' araneid phylogcny. The sister group of Araneidae is all other Araneoidea. Araneidae comprises two major clades: the subfamily Araneinae, and the 'argiopoid' clade, which includes all other subfamilies and most tribes (((Gasteracanthinae, Caerostreae), (((Micratheninae, Xylcthreae), Eruyosaccus ), (Eurycorminae, Arciinae)), Cyrlarachninae), ((Argiopinae, Cyrtophorinae), Arachnureae)). Cyrtarachneae and Mastophoreae are united in a new subfamily, Cyr-tarachninae. The spiny orb-weavers alone (Gasteracanthinae and Micratheninae) are not monophyletic. The mimetid subfamily Arciinae and the 'tetragnathid' genus Zygiella are araneids, but .Nephila (and other tetragnathids) are not. On the preferred tree, web decorations (stabilimenta) evolved 9 times within 15 genera, and were lost once. The use of silk to subdue prey evolved once in cribellate and four times in ecribillate orb weavers. Sexual size dimorphism evolved once in nephilines, twice in araneids, and reverted to monomorphism five times. Evolution in other genitalic and somatic characters is also assessed; behavioral and spinneret features arc most consistent (male genitalia, leg and prosomal features least consistent) on the phylogeny.     

The systematic position of Aspidytidae, the diversification of Dytiscoidea (Coleoptera, Adephaga) and the phylogenetic signal of third codon positions

Characters of the newly discovered larvae of the South African Cliff Water Beetle Aspidytes niobe were examined and integrated into a data matrix including all families of Dytiscoidea as well as Haliplidae. Fifty-three morphological characters of adults and larvae were analysed separately and combined with molecular data from six nuclear and mitochondrial genes. The phylogeny of the group is reconstructed for the study of the evolution of swimming behaviour and larval feeding habits, as well as the shift in diversification rates leading to the two most speciose lineages. The parsimony analysis of all equally weighted morphological and molecular characters combined resulted in a single well supported tree with the topology (Noteridae (Hygrobiidae ((Aspidytidae, Amphizoidae) Dytiscidae))), in agreement with the molecular data alone, but in contradiction to the morphological data, which favoured a topology in which Hygrobiidae is sister to Dytiscidae. The exclusion of third codon positions of the three protein coding genes resulted in a topology identical to that obtained with the morphological data alone, but the use of Bayesian probabilities or the amino acid sequence resulted in the same topology as that of the tree obtained with parsimony using all equally weighted characters. We concluded that interactions of third codon positions with the other data are complex, and their removal is not justified. There was a significant increase in the diversification rate at the base of the richest families (Noteridae and Dytiscidae), which could be associated with the development of simultaneous stroke and higher swimming performance, although data on the swimming behaviour of some basal groups of Noteridae are incomplete. The presence of larval mandibular sucking channels may have contributed to the diversification of Dytiscidae and the species-rich noterid genera Hydrocanthus and Canthydrus .     

A phylogenetic analysis of the extant Aeshnidae (Odonata: Anisoptera)

Abstract A cladistic analysis of the world Aeshnidae is presented, based on fifty-eight characters of adult and larval anatomy. The ingroup taxa include all the extant genera of Aeshnidae, and the austropetaliid genera Phyllopetalia and Hypopetalia were chosen as the outgroup. The strict consensus tree obtained after successive weighting shows that the subgroups defined traditionally for Aeshnidae are paraphyletic or polyphyletic. The previous reclassification derived from analyses based on wing venation is supported in terms of the monophyly of Aeshnidae, Gomphaeschninae and its sister group comprising the remaining Aeshnidae. Gomphaeschninae is confirmed as sister group of the remaining Aeshnidae (= Aeshnodea Bechly). The sister-group relationships between Gomphaeschna + Sarasaeschna and Linaeschna + Oligoaeschna are corroborated. Within Aeshnodea, three monophyletic groups emerged: Boyeria + ( Petaliaeschna + ( Limnetron + Gynacanthaeschna + Periaeschna )) + (( Cephalaeschna + Caliaeschna ) + ( Allopetalia ( Notoaeschna + Spinaeschna ))); Dendroaeschna + ( Epiaeschna + ( Aeschnophlebia + ( Nasiaeschna + ( Tetracanthagyna + Brachytron )))); and Polycanthagyna + ( Basiaeschna + ( Amphiaeschna + ( Indaeschna + ( Oplonaeschna + ( Racenaeschna + Plattycantha + Agyrtacantha + Triacanthagyna + ( Subaeschna + Austrogynacantha + Gynacantha ) + ( Heliaeschna + ( Neuraeschna + Staurophlebia ))) + (( Castoraeschna + Coryphaeschna + Remartinia ) + ( Oreaeschna + ( Aeshna + ( Anaciaeschna + ((' A .' isosceles + Andaeshna ) + ( Anax + Hemianax )))))). Additional informative characters are required to test the relationships suggested here between the main groups of Aeshnodea and some enigmatic basal taxa ( Antipodophlebia , Austroaeschna , Acanthaeschna , Telephlebia , Austrophlebia and Planaeschna ).     

Phylogenetic position of the saola (Pseudoryx nghetinhensis) inferred from cytogenetic analysis of eleven species of Bovidae

Previous morphological and molecular analyses failed to resolve the phylogenetic position of the critically endangered saola (Pseudoryx nghetinhensis) with respect to its placement in Bovina (cattle, bison, and yak) or Bubalina (Asian and African buffaloes). In the present study, G- and C-banding, Ag-staining and FISH with 28S and telomeric probes was undertaken for 17 bovid species. An analysis of these data allowed us to identify 49 structural rearrangements that included autosomes, gonosomes and 17 different NOR sites. The combined data set was subjected to a cladistic analysis aimed at: (i) providing new insights on phylogenetic relationships of the saola and other species within the subfamily Bovinae, and (ii) testing the suitability of different classes of chromosomal characters for phylogenetic reconstruction of the family Bovidae. The study revealed that nucleolar organizing regions (NORs) are phylogenetically informative. It was shown that at least one, or sometimes two of these characters punctuate divergences that include nodes that are the most basal in the tree, to those that are the most recent. In this context, the shared presence of three NORs in saola and species of Syncerus and Bubalus strongly suggests the saola's placement within the subtribe Bubalina. This contrasts with Robertsonian rearrangements which are informative only at the generic level. These findings suggest that NORs are an important and frequently overlooked source of additional phylogenetic information within the Bovidae that may also have applicability at higher taxonomic levels, possibly even for Pecora.     

CHARACTER REMOVAL AS A MEANS FOR ASSESSING STABILITY OF CLADES

Abstract— The stability of each clade resolved by a data set can be assessed as the minimum number of characters that, when removed, cause resolution of the clade to be lost; a clade is regarded as having been lost when it does occur in the strict consensus tree. The clade stability index (CSI) is the ratio of this minimum number of characters to the number of informative characters in the data set. The CSI of a clade can range from 0 (absence from the consensus tree of the complete data set) to 1 (all informative characters must be removed for the clade to fail to be resolved). Minimum character removal scores are discoverable by a procedure known as successive character removal, in which separate cladistic analyses are conducted of all possible data sets derived by the removal of individual characters and character combinations of successively increasing number.     

Habitat type as a determinant of species range sizes: the example of lotic–lentic differences in aquatic Goleoptera

Species differ in the size of their geographical ranges, but it is unclear how this is affected by the intrinsic properties of various habitat types. Using data on range sizes for 490 species of aquatic Coleoptera from the Iberian Peninsula we show that running-water (lotic) species have much smaller distributional ranges than those occurring in standing water (lentic). This robust association of habitat type and range size has independently arisen in at least four monophyletic coleopteran lineages, in Hydradephaga, Hydrophiloidea, Hydraenidae and Byrrhoidea, and several more times within these main groups. We propose that this pattern is due to different evolutionary dynamics of both habitat types: stagnant water bodies are more likely to completely disappear, requiring frequent migration of resident populations. Rivers and streams, on the contrary, have more temporal and spatial continuity, and therefore permit the long-term persistence of local populations. In less permanent habitats species will require a greater geographical mobility, which indirectly results in a larger size range. The less dispersive populations of running water should also have reduced gene flow, increasing the probability of allopatric speciation, and thus reducing the average range of more widespread ancestral species. These differences in population parameters, and the frequency of transitions between the two habitat types, may have strong macroevolutionary consequences, in particular regarding speciation rates and possible morphological specializations.     

Internal transcribed spacer rDNA can be used to infer the phylogenetic relationships of species within the genus Nematodirus (Nematoda: molineoidea)

Sequences of the first internal transcribed spacer rDNA were characterised for four veterinary important species of gastrointestinal nematodes from the genus Nematodirus. The sequence data were combined with previously published data of the second internal transcribed spacer to determine whether these rDNA regions provided a suitable number of informative characters to determine the phylogenetic relationships of species within the genus. A total of 32 alignment positions of the first internal transcribed spacer data set and 33 characters from the second internal transcribed spacer data set were informative in phylogenetic analyses. Irrespective of whether the data from each spacer were analysed separately or combined, only one most parsimonious tree was produced, with the relationships of the four species fully resolved. In addition, several regions of conservatism in the first internal transcribed spacer sequence among the four Nematodirus species suggests that this rDNA region may also provide phylogenetic information for higher taxonomic levels within the Molineoidea.     

Exploring the potential of nuclear and mitochondrial sequencing data generated through genome‐skimming for plant phylogenetics: A case study from a clade of neotropical lianas

Few botanical studies have explored the potential of nuclear ribosomal DNA (nrDNA) and mitochondrial DNA (mtDNA) data obtained through genome skimming for phylogeny reconstruction. Here, we analyzed the phylogenetic information included in the nrDNA and mtDNA of 44 species of the “Adenocalymma‐Neojobertia” clade (Bignoniaceae). To deal with intraindividual polymorphisms within the nrDNA, different coding schemes were explored through the analyses of four datasets: (i) “nrDNA contig,” with base call following the majority rule; (ii) “nrDNA ambiguous,” with ambiguous base calls; (iii) “nrDNA informative,” with ambiguities converted to multistate characters; and, (iv) “mitochondrial,” with 39 mitochondrial genes. Combined analyses using the nrDNA and mtDNA data and previously published “plastid” datasets were also conducted. Trees were obtained using Maximum Likelihood and Bayesian criteria. The congruence among genomes was assessed. The nrDNA datasets were shown to be highly polymorphic within individuals, while the “mitochondrial” dataset was the least informative, with 0.36% of informative bases within the ingroup. The topologies inferred using the nrDNA and mtDNA datasets were broadly congruent with the tree derived from the analyses of the “plastid” dataset. The topological differences recovered were generally poorly supported. The topology that resulted from the analyses of the “combined” dataset largely resembles the “plastid” tree. These results highlight limitations of nuclear ribosomal DNA and mitochondrial genes for phylogeny reconstruction obtained through genome skimming and the need to include more data from both genomes. The different topologies observed among genomes also highlight the importance of exploring data from various genomes in plant phylogenetics.     

Phylogeny and the fossil record of the Helophoridae reveal Jurassic origin of extant hydrophiloid lineages (Coleoptera: Polyphaga)

We performed a phylogenetic analysis focused on the hydrophiloid family Helophoridae (Coleoptera: Polyphaga) in order to test the phylogenetic position of selected Mesozoic fossils assigned to the Hydrophiloidea. The analysis is based on 92 characters of larvae and adults, and includes all extant subgenera of Helophorus and representatives of all other extant hydrophiloid families. Based on this analysis, we provide additional evidence for the monophyly of the helophorid lineage containing the families Helophoridae, Georissidae and Epimetopidae, as well as the first hypothesis on the phylogenetic relationships within Helophorus, revealing three main clades: Lihelophorus, Rhopalohelophorus and the clade of sculptured small subgenera; the subgenera Helophorus s.str., Gephelophorus, Trichohelophorus and Transithelophorus are recognized as paraphyletic or polyphyletic. Inclusion of fossil species in the analysis reveals the Mesozoic genera Hydrophilopsia Ponomarenko, Laetopsia Fiká?ek et al. (adult forms) and Cretotaenia Ponomarenko (larval form) as basal extinct clades of the helophorid lineage, the former genus Mesosperchus Ponomarenko as containing probable stem taxa of Helophorus and the former genus Mesohelophorus Ponomarenko as a member of the Helophorus clade containing extant sculptured subgenera. The extant subgenus Thaumhelophorus syn.nov. is synonymized with Rhopalohelophorus. Our results show that the family Helophoridae may be dated back to the late Jurassic (c. 150 Ma) and the extant clades of Helophorus back to the Early Cretaceous (c. 136 Ma). The basal groups of Helophorus and the supposed basal extinct lineages of the helophorid lineages are shown to be aquatic as adults. A single origin of trichobothria and ventral hydrophobic pubescence in the common ancestor of the Hydrophiloidea is hypothesized, indicating ancestral aquatic habits in the adult stage for the whole Hydrophiloidea.     

On the evolution of adult head structures and the phylogeny of Hydraenidae (Coleoptera, Staphyliniformia)

External and internal head structures of adults of Orchymontiinae, Prosthetopinae, Hydraeninae and Ochthebiinae were studied and those of Ochthebius semisericeus and Limnebius truncatellus are described in detail. The results are evaluated with respect to their relevance for a reconstruction of hydraenid phylogeny and also compared with structural features found in adults of other staphyliniform families. The monophyly of Hydraenidae is supported by the presence of a plate‐like, trilobed premento‐hypopharyngeal extension, an unusual origin of m. tentoriohypopharyngalis, dorsal tentorial arms firmly fused with the head capsule, modified basal antennomeres, and palpigers connected by a transverse sclerotized bar. Orchymontiinae are monophyletic and the basal sister group of the remaining Hydraenidae. The presence of a ventral transverse genal bulge and of a pubescent antennal club with more than two antennomeres (reversal in some prosthetopines: e.g. Mesoceration abstrictum) are possible apomorphies of Hydraenidae excluding Orchymontiinae. Prosthetopinae are probably monophyletic and the sister group of Ochthebiinae + Hydraeninae. The latter clade is characterized by a distinct cupula formed by antennomere VI, a loose five‐segmented pubescent antennal club, and a modified antennal musculature. The presence of an unusual tentorio‐pharyngeal dilator is a shared derived feature of Ochthebiinae and the genus Davidraena. The monophyly of Ochthebiinae was confirmed and Ochtheosus is the sister group of the remaining ochthebiine genera, which are characterized by a perforated wall‐like structure formed by the posterior tentorial arms. The absence of this tentorial modification and the fimbriate galea are plesiomorphies retained in Ochtheosus. Calobius differs strongly from other subgenera of Ochthebius and a generic status may be appropriate. The monophyly of Hydraeninae is not supported. Hydraena was confirmed as a clade and Laeliaena and Limnebius are sister groups. The latter genus is characterized by several autapomorphies. The basal position of Orchymontiinae and Prosthetopinae suggests a Gondwanan origin of Hydraenidae and a primary preference for life in running water. Important evolutionary changes of head structures are complex transformations of the antennae and related structures. Yet, the use of the antennae as accessory breathing organs is not a groundplan feature of the family. The results of this study strengthen the case of staphylinoid affinities of Hydraenidae.     

Phylogenetic relationships within the genus Cranothrips (Thysanoptera,Melanthripidae) with consideration of host associations and disjunct distributions within the family

Abstract A phylogenetic analysis of the Melanthripidae genus Cranothrips Bagnall is presented. A data matrix with continuous and discrete characters was analysed under parsimony criteria. Continuous and discrete characters were analysed, separately and in combination. When the different blocks of characters were analysed separately, important differences in tree topologies occurred. The optimal tree obtained from discrete characters alone was similar to the tree resulting from total evidence. For most groups, the support values resulting from all the evidence analysis were higher than those obtained from the discrete‐only analysis. Two new species from Australia are described and illustrated, Cranothrips ibisca sp.n. and Cranothrips conostylus sp.n. A key to the 12 species in the genus is provided. Additionally, the host associations and the distributional patterns of the four worldwide genera of Melanthripidae are discussed.     

Taxic Revisions

Parsimony analysis provides a straightforward way of assessing homology on a tree: a state shared by two terminals comprises homologous similarity if optimization attributes that state to all the stem species lying between those terminals. Three-taxon statements (3ts), although seemingly "exact" in that each either fits a tree or does not, do not provide a satisfactory assessment of homology, because that assessment can be internally contradictory and because 3ts systematically exclude homologous resemblance in reversed states. Modified 3ts analysis (m3ta), a method in which both plesiomorphic and apomorphic states of "paired homologue" (PH) characters (those other than presence/absence data) are regarded as "informative" (able to distinguish groups), can (obviously) group by symplesiomorphy and so form paraphyletic groups unless data are clocklike enough. Patterson's pattern analysis (ppa) has the same shortcoming, to which it adds the drawback that only characters fitting the tree perfectly are used, a restriction that can easily lead to discarding most of the structure in the data. Revised m3ta (rm3ta), a method in which plesiomorphic states are not taken as informative, can also form paraphyletic groups, because it cannot apply reversals as apomorphies. The idea that knowledge of phylogeny has been derived from classifications does not imply that nonevolutionary methods should be employed for classification, but instead means that systematic methods must be logically capable of phylogenetic interpretation. Neither m3ta nor rm3ta satisfies that requirement because of their contradictory assessments of homology.     

Origin of Ginkgo biloba L. Phylogenetic approach

A cladistic analysis on fossil and modern Gymnosperms (20 taxa) is presented and discussed with particular mention of Ginkgo biloba L. origin. The consensus tree obtained from 68 characters (59 informative characters) shows a monophyletic clade containing all plants bearing micropylate ovules ('Micropylophytes'). Medullosales appear at the base of this clade. Ginkgo forms the sister group of the Dicranophyllales + Coniferales. The obtained phylogeny implies that the Ginkgoales ancestor is to be found during the Upper Carboniferous.     

Clade stability and the addition of data: A case study from erigonine spiders (Araneae: Linyphiidae, Erigoninae)

This study presents a new phylogeny of erigonine spiders with emphasis on genera from the Neotropics. Thirty‐nine exemplar taxa representing mostly Neotropical genera were added to a global sample of 31 erigonine and 12 outgroup exemplar taxa analyzed in a previous study. These 82 taxa were coded for 176 (172 informative) mostly morphological characters. Eighty‐one characters were identical to or modified from the 73 (67 informative) characters included in a previous study; the remaining 95 characters are new. The complete data set includes 70 erigonine exemplars representing 65 genera, seven nonerigonine linyphiid exemplars, and five exemplars representing four araneoid families in the outgroup. Cladistic analysis resulted in a single most parsimonious tree (L =904, CI = 0.23, RI = 0.58; uninformative characters excluded: L = 900, CI = 0.23). This paper explores the implications of the new topology for the evolution of several characters of interest in erigonine evolution. The phylogeny implies that the desmitracheate condition is a synapomorphy of erigonines, with a reversal to the haplotracheate condition in one large clade within Erigoninae. We infer that the loss of the paracymbium in Neotropical erigonines occurred twice and may have progressed by different evolutionary pathways. Our phylogeny differs markedly from the previous cladistic hypothesis of erigonine relationships. We investigate how the addition of characters and taxa (alone and together) have altered the earlier hypothesis of erigonine phylogeny. We conclude that topological changes from the previous study to the current one are largely the result of adding and modifying characters, not adding taxa. Continuous Jackknife Function (CJF) analysis predicts that the inclusion of additional character data will continue to imply changes in the relationships among taxa in our analysis.     

How many marmoset (Primates: Cebidae: Callitrichinae) genera are there? A phylogenetic analysis based on multiple morphological systems

The marmosets, tribe Callitrichini, are the most speciose clade in the subfamily Callitrichinae, containing 21 species. However, there is no consensus among molecular and morphological systematists as to how many genera should be recognized for the group. To test the morphological support for the alternative generic classifications, this study presents a comprehensive phylogenetic analysis. It is the first such analysis to include all 21 species and employ continuous and discrete osteological, pelage and tegument, karyological and vocal characters. This dataset was combined with nucleotide sequences from two mitochondrial and four nuclear regions. Separate analyses showed that, among morphological datasets, osteological characters were best at solving relationships at more inclusive levels, whilst pelage characters were most informative at the interspecific level. This suggests the presence of different transformation rates for the two character sets. When a single most parsimonious tree was obtained using the 83‐character matrix, three main clades were identified, supporting the division of the marmosets into three genera: Callithrix, Cebuella and Mico. The total evidence analysis that included an additional 3481 molecular characters corroborated most of the morphology‐based clades and also supported a three‐genus classification of the marmosets. This is the first morphological study to support an Amazonian marmoset clade (Cebuella + Mico), which is also strongly supported in exclusively molecular phylogenies, and to synonimize Callibella under Mico.