Differential roles of arrestin-2 interaction with clathrin and adaptor protein 2 in G protein-coupled receptor trafficking

The non-visual arrestins, arrestin-2 and arrestin-3, play a critical role in regulating the signaling and trafficking of many G protein-coupled receptors (GPCRs). Molecular insight into the role of arrestins in GPCR trafficking has suggested that arrestin interaction with clathrin, beta(2)-adaptin (the beta-subunit of the adaptor protein AP2), and phosphoinositides contributes to this process. In the present study, we have attempted to better define the molecular basis and functional role of arrestin-2 interaction with clathrin and beta(2)-adaptin. Site-directed mutagenesis revealed that the C-terminal region of arrestin-2 mediated beta(2)-adaptin and clathrin interaction with Phe-391 and Arg-395 having an essential role in beta(2)-adaptin binding and LIELD (residues 376-380) having an essential role in clathrin binding. Interestingly, arrestin-2-R169E, an activated form of arrestin that binds to GPCRs in a phosphorylation-independent manner, has significantly enhanced binding to beta(2)-adaptin and clathrin. This suggests that receptor-induced conformational changes in the C-terminal tail of arrestin-2 will likely play a major role in mediating arrestin interaction with clathrin-coated pits. In an effort to clarify the role of these interactions in GPCR trafficking we generated arrestin mutants that were completely and selectively defective in either clathrin (arrestin-2-DeltaLIELD) or beta(2)-adaptin (arrestin-2-F391A) interaction. Analysis of these mutants in COS-1 cells revealed that arrestin/clathrin interaction was essential for agonist-promoted internalization of the beta(2)-adrenergic receptor, while arrestin/beta(2)-adaptin interaction appeared less critical. Arrestin-2 mutants defective in both clathrin and beta(2)-adaptin binding functioned as effective dominant negatives in HEK293 cells and significantly attenuated beta(2)-adrenergic receptor internalization. These mutants should prove useful in better defining the role of arrestins in mediating receptor trafficking.     

Agonist-induced internalization of the platelet-activating factor receptor is dependent on arrestins but independent of G-protein activation. Role of the C terminus and the (D/N)PXXY motif.

As with most G-protein-coupled receptors, repeated agonist stimulation of the platelet-activating factor receptor (PAFR) results in its desensitization, sequestration, and internalization. In this report, we show that agonist-induced PAFR internalization is independent of G-protein activation but is dependent on arrestins and involves the interaction of arrestins with a limited region of the PAFR C terminus. In cotransfected COS-7 cells, both arrestin-2 and arrestin-3 could be coimmunoprecipitated with PAFR, and agonist stimulation of PAFR induced the translocation of both arrestin-2 and arrestin-3. Furthermore, coexpression of arrestin-2 with PAFR potentiated receptor internalization, whereas agonist-induced PAFR internalization was inhibited by a dominant negative mutant of arrestin-2. The coexpression of a minigene encoding the C-terminal segment of the receptor abolished PAF-induced arrestin translocation and inhibited PAFR internalization. Using C terminus deletion mutants, we determined that the association of arrestin-2 with the receptor was dependent on the region between threonine 305 and valine 330 because arrestin-2 could be immunoprecipitated with the mutant PAFRstop330 but not PAFRstop305. Consistently, stop330 could mediate agonist-induced arrestin-2 translocation, whereas stop305 could not. Two other deletion mutants with slightly longer regions of the C terminus, PAFRstop311 and PAFRstop317, also failed to induce arrestin-2 translocation. Finally, the PAFR mutant Y293A, containing a single substitution in the putative internalization motif DPXXY in the seventh transmembrane domain (which we had shown to be able to internalize but not to couple to G-proteins) could efficiently induce arrestin translocation. Taken together, our results indicate that ligand-induced PAFR internalization is dependent on arrestins, that PAFR can associate with both arrestin-2 and -3, and that their translocation involves interaction with the region of residues 318-330 in the PAFR C terminus but is independent of G-protein activation.     

The rate of internalization of the gonadotropin receptors is greatly affected by the origin of the extracellular domain.

Previous results from this laboratory have shown that human kidney (293) cells transfected with the rat follitropin receptor (rFSHR) internalize agonist (i.e. human follitropin, hFSH) at a rate similar to that of other agonist-G protein-coupled receptor complexes while 293 cells transfected with the rat lutropin/choriogonadotropin receptor (rLHR) internalize agonist (human choriogonadotropin, hCG) at a rate that is about 1 order of magnitude slower. Taking advantage of this difference and the high degree of homology between the rLHR and rFSHR, we have now used chimeras of these two receptors to begin to delineate structural features that influence their internalization. Analysis of six chimeras that exchanged only the transmembrane domains (designated FLF and LFL), only the COOH-terminal domains (FFL or LLF) or both domains (FLL or LFF) show that the origin of the extracellular domain is at least as important, if not more, than the origin of the transmembrane and COOH-terminal domains in determining the rate of internalization of the gonadotropin receptors. Thus, the rates of internalization of agonist internalization mediated by FFL, FLF, and FLL more closely resemble rFSHR than rLHR, while the rates of agonist internalization mediated by LLF, LFL, and LFF more closely resemble rLHR than rFSHR. The importance of the extracellular domain was also evident even upon overexpression of arrestin-3, a protein that enhances the rate of internalization of the wild-type receptors and chimeras by binding to their intracellular regions.     

Role of G protein-coupled receptor kinases on the agonist-induced phosphorylation and internalization of the follitropin receptor.

The experiments presented herein were designed to identify members of the G protein-coupled receptor kinase (GRK) family that participate in the agonist-induced phosphorylation and internalization of the rat FSH receptor (rFSHR). Western blots of human kidney 293 cells (the cell line used in transfection experiments) and MSC-1 cells (a cell line derived from Sertoli cells that displays many of the differentiated functions of their normal counterparts) reveal the presence of GRK2 and GRK6 in both cell lines as well as GRK4 in MSC-1 cells. Cotransfection of 293 cells with the rFSHR and GRK2, GRK4alpha, or GRK6 resulted in an increase in the agonist-induced phosphorylation of the rFSHR. Cotransfections of the rFSHR with GRKs or arrestin-3 enhanced the agonist-induced internalization of the rFHSR, and combinations of GRKs and arrestin-3 were more effective than the individual components. To characterize the involvement of endogenous GRKs on phosphorylation and internalization, we inhibited endogenous GRK2 by overexpression of a kinase-deficient mutant of GRK2 or G alpha t, a scavenger of G betagamma. We also inhibited endogenous GRK6 by overexpression of a kinase-deficient mutant of GKR6. All three constructs were effective inhibitors of phosphorylation, but only the kinase-deficient mutant of GRK2 and G alpha t inhibited internalization. The inhibition of internalization induced by these two constructs was less pronounced than that induced by a dominant-negative mutant of the nonvisual arrrestins, however. The finding that inhibitors of GRK2 and GRK6 impair phosphorylation, but only the inhibitors of GRK2 impair internalization, suggests that different GRKs have differential effects on receptor internalization.     

Few residues within an extensive binding interface drive receptor interaction and determine the specificity of arrestin proteins

Arrestins bind active phosphorylated forms of G protein-coupled receptors, terminating G protein activation, orchestrating receptor trafficking, and redirecting signaling to alternative pathways. Visual arrestin-1 preferentially binds rhodopsin, whereas the two non-visual arrestins interact with hundreds of G protein-coupled receptor subtypes. Here we show that an extensive surface on the concave side of both arrestin-2 domains is involved in receptor binding. We also identified a small number of residues on the receptor binding surface of the N- and C-domains that largely determine the receptor specificity of arrestins. We show that alanine substitution of these residues blocks the binding of arrestin-1 to rhodopsin in vitro and of arrestin-2 and -3 to β2-adrenergic, M2 muscarinic cholinergic, and D2 dopamine receptors in intact cells, suggesting that these elements critically contribute to the energy of the interaction. Thus, in contrast to arrestin-1, where direct phosphate binding is crucial, the interaction of non-visual arrestins with their cognate receptors depends to a lesser extent on phosphate binding and more on the binding to non-phosphorylated receptor elements.     

Characterization of G protein-coupled receptor regulation in antisense mRNA-expressing cells with reduced arrestin levels.

Previous studies with overexpressing wild-type or dominant negative nonvisual arrestins have established a role for these proteins in beta2-adrenergic receptor (beta2AR) internalization, desensitization, and resensitization. To validate and extend such findings, we employed an antisense strategy to target the nonvisual arrestins, arrestin-2 and arrestin-3, and determined the associated effects on the regulation of G protein-coupled receptor (GPCR) signaling. HEK293 cells stably expressing antisense constructs targeting arrestin-2 exhibited a selective reduction (approximately 50%) in arrestin-2 levels, while arrestin-3 antisense constructs resulted in reductions (>/=50%) in both arrestin-2 and arrestin-3 levels. Initial analysis of these cells demonstrated that a reduced level of arrestin expression resulted in a significant decrease in the extent of agonist-induced internalization of exogenously expressed beta2ARs, but had no effect on internalization of either m2 or m3 muscarinic acetylcholine receptors. Additional characterization involved assessing the role of arrestins in the regulation of endogenous GPCRs in these cells. Reduced arrestin levels significantly decreased the rate of endogenous beta2AR internalization, desensitization, and resensitization. Further analysis demonstrated that the desensitization of endogenous A2b adenosine and prostaglandin E2-stimulated receptors was also attenuated in cells with reduced arrestin levels. The effects on the beta2-adrenergic, A2b adenosine, and PGE2-stimulated receptors were similar among cell lines that exhibited either a selective reduction in arrestin-2 levels or a reduction in both arrestin-2 and -3 levels. These findings establish the utility of antisense approaches in the examination of arrestin-mediated GPCR regulation.     

Identification of Receptor Binding-induced Conformational Changes in Non-visual Arrestins

The non-visual arrestins, arrestin-2 and arrestin-3, belong to a small family of multifunctional cytosolic proteins. Non-visual arrestins interact with hundreds of G protein-coupled receptors (GPCRs) and regulate GPCR desensitization by binding active phosphorylated GPCRs and uncoupling them from heterotrimeric G proteins. Recently, non-visual arrestins have been shown to mediate G protein-independent signaling by serving as adaptors and scaffolds that assemble multiprotein complexes. By recruiting various partners, including trafficking and signaling proteins, directly to GPCRs, non-visual arrestins connect activated receptors to diverse signaling pathways. To investigate arrestin-mediated signaling, a structural understanding of arrestin activation and interaction with GPCRs is essential. Here we identified global and local conformational changes in the non-visual arrestins upon binding to the model GPCR rhodopsin. To detect conformational changes, pairs of spin labels were introduced into arrestin-2 and arrestin-3, and the interspin distances in the absence and presence of the receptor were measured by double electron electron resonance spectroscopy. Our data indicate that both non-visual arrestins undergo several conformational changes similar to arrestin-1, including the finger loop moving toward the predicted location of the receptor in the complex as well as the C-tail release upon receptor binding. The arrestin-2 results also suggest that there is no clam shell-like closure of the N- and C-domains and that the loop containing residue 136 (homolog of 139 in arrestin-1) has high flexibility in both free and receptor-bound states.     

The third intracellular loop of alpha 2-adrenergic receptors determines subtype specificity of arrestin interaction

Nonvisual arrestins (arrestin-2 and -3) serve as adaptors to link agonist-activated G protein-coupled receptors to the endocytic machinery. Although many G protein-coupled receptors bind arrestins, the molecular determinants involved in binding remain largely unknown. Because arrestins selectively promote the internalization of the alpha(2b)- and alpha(2c)-adrenergic receptors (ARs) while having no effect on the alpha(2a)AR, here we used alpha(2)ARs to identify molecular determinants involved in arrestin binding. Initially, we assessed the ability of purified arrestins to bind glutathione S-transferase fusions containing the third intracellular loops of the alpha(2a)AR, alpha(2b)AR, or alpha(2c)AR. These studies revealed that arrestin-3 directly binds to the alpha(2b)AR and alpha(2c)AR but not the alpha(2a)AR, whereas arrestin-2 only binds to the alpha(2b)AR. Truncation mutagenesis of the alpha(2b)AR identified two arrestin-3 binding domains in the third intracellular loop, one at the N-terminal end (residues 194-214) and the other at the C-terminal end (residues 344-368). Site-directed mutagenesis further revealed a critical role for several basic residues in arrestin-3 binding to the alpha(2b)AR third intracellular loop. Mutation of these residues in the holo-alpha(2b)AR and subsequent expression in HEK 293 cells revealed that the mutations had no effect on the ability of the receptor to activate ERK1/2. However, agonist-promoted internalization of the mutant alpha(2b)AR was significantly attenuated as compared with wild type receptor. These results demonstrate that arrestin-3 binds to two discrete regions within the alpha(2b)AR third intracellular loop and that disruption of arrestin binding selectively abrogates agonist-promoted receptor internalization.     

The C-terminal tail of the rat lutropin/choriogonadotropin (CG) receptor independently modulates human (h)CG-induced internalization of the cell surface receptor and the lysosomal targeting of the internalized hCG-receptor complex

The analysis of 21 progressive truncations of the C-terminal tail of the rat LH/CG receptor (rLHR) revealed the presence of a region delineated by residues 628-649 that, when removed, enhanced the degradation of the internalized human (h)CG. The analysis of these truncations also revealed the presence of a region delineated by residues 624-631 that, when removed, enhanced the rate of internalization of hCG. Since there is little overlap between these two regions, we conclude that the structural features of the rLHR that mediate internalization and degradation of the internalized hormone are different. Detailed analyses of cells expressing a truncation at Y637 (designated rLHR-t637) showed that the enhanced degradation of hCG observed in the these cells is due to an increase in the rate of transfer of the internalized hCG-rLHR complex from the endosomes to the lysosomes rather than to the enhanced dissociation of the hCG-rLHR complex in the lysosomes.     

Role of receptor-attached phosphates in binding of visual and non-visual arrestins to G protein-coupled receptors

Arrestins are a small family of proteins that regulate G protein-coupled receptors (GPCRs). Arrestins specifically bind to phosphorylated active receptors, terminating G protein coupling, targeting receptors to endocytic vesicles, and initiating G protein-independent signaling. The interaction of rhodopsin-attached phosphates with Lys-14 and Lys-15 in β-strand I was shown to disrupt the interaction of α-helix I, β-strand I, and the C-tail of visual arrestin-1, facilitating its transition into an active receptor-binding state. Here we tested the role of conserved lysines in homologous positions of non-visual arrestins by generating K2A mutants in which both lysines were replaced with alanines. K2A mutations in arrestin-1, -2, and -3 significantly reduced their binding to active phosphorhodopsin in vitro. The interaction of arrestins with several GPCRs in intact cells was monitored by a bioluminescence resonance energy transfer (BRET)-based assay. BRET data confirmed the role of Lys-14 and Lys-15 in arrestin-1 binding to non-cognate receptors. However, this was not the case for non-visual arrestins in which the K2A mutations had little effect on net BRET(max) values for the M2 muscarinic acetylcholine (M2R), β(2)-adrenergic (β(2)AR), or D2 dopamine receptors. Moreover, a phosphorylation-deficient mutant of M2R interacted with wild type non-visual arrestins normally, whereas phosphorylation-deficient β(2)AR mutants bound arrestins at 20-50% of the level of wild type β(2)AR. Thus, the contribution of receptor-attached phosphates to arrestin binding varies depending on the receptor-arrestin pair. Although arrestin-1 always depends on receptor phosphorylation, its role in the recruitment of arrestin-2 and -3 is much greater in the case of β(2)AR than M2R and D2 dopamine receptor.     

Studies with chimeras of the gonadotropin receptors reveal the importance of third intracellular loop threonines on the formation of the receptor/nonvisual arrestin complex

Using chimeras and more discrete exchange mutations of the rat (r) and human (h) gonadotropin receptors, we had previously identified multiple noncontiguous residues of the lutropin (LHR) and follitropin (FSHR) receptors that dictate their rates of internalization. Since the internalization of the LHR and the FSHR is driven by their abilities to associate with the nonvisual arrestins, we hypothesized that one or more of the residues previously identified by the internalization assays are involved in the formation of the receptor/nonvisual arrestin complex. In the studies reported herein, we tested this hypothesis by measuring the association of arrestin-3 with a large number of rLHR/hLHR and rFSHR/hFSHR exchange mutants that affect internalization. The results presented show that the same residues that dictate the rate of internalization of these two receptor pairs affect their ability to associate with arrestin-3. Although these residues are located in distinct topological domains, our analyses show that threonine residues in the third intracellular loop of both receptor pairs are particularly important for the formation of the receptor/arrestin-3 complexes and internalization. We conclude that the different rates of internalization of the gonadotropin receptors are dictated by their different abilities to associate with the nonvisual arrestins and that this association is, in turn, largely dictated by the presence of threonine residues in their third intracellular loops.     

Regulation of cysteinyl leukotriene type 1 receptor internalization and signaling

Cysteinyl leukotrienes activate the cysteinyl leukotriene type 1 receptor (CysLT1R) to regulate numerous cell functions important in inflammatory processes and diseases such as asthma. Despite its physiologic importance, no studies to date have examined the regulation of CysLT1R signaling or trafficking. We have established model systems for analyzing recombinant human CysLT1R and found regulation of internalization and signaling of the CysLT1R to be unique among G protein-coupled receptors. Rapid and profound LTD4-stimulated internalization was observed for the wild type (WT) CysLT1R, whereas a C-terminal truncation mutant exhibited impaired internalization yet signaled robustly, suggesting a region within amino acids 310-321 as critical to internalization. Although overexpression of WT arrestins significantly increased WT CysLT1R internalization, expression of dominant-negative arrestins had minimal effects, and WT CysLT1R internalized in murine embryonic fibroblasts lacking both arrestin-2 and arrestin-3, suggesting that arrestins are not the primary physiologic regulators of CysLT1Rs. Instead, pharmacologic inhibition of protein kinase C (PKC) was shown to profoundly inhibit CysLT1R internalization while greatly increasing both phosphoinositide (PI) production and calcium mobilization stimulated by LTD4 yet had almost no effect on H1 histamine receptor internalization or signaling. Moreover, mutation of putative PKC phosphorylation sites within the CysLT1R C-tail (CysLT1RS(313-316)A) reduced receptor internalization, increased PI production and calcium mobilization by LTD4, and significantly attenuated the effects of PKC inhibition. These findings characterized the CysLT1R as the first G protein-coupled receptor identified to date in which PKC is the principal regulator of both rapid agonist-dependent internalization and rapid agonist-dependent desensitization.     

Trafficking of the HIV coreceptor CXCR4. Role of arrestins and identification of residues in the c-terminal tail that mediate receptor internalization.

The G protein-coupled chemokine receptor CXCR4 serves as the primary coreceptor for entry of T-cell tropic human immunodeficiency virus. CXCR4 undergoes tonic internalization as well as internalization in response to stimulation with phorbol esters and ligand (SDF-1alpha). We investigated the trafficking of this receptor, and we attempted to define the residues of CXCR4 that were critical for receptor internalization. In both COS-1 and HEK-293 cells transiently overexpressing CXCR4, SDF-1alpha and phorbol esters (PMA) promoted rapid internalization of cell surface receptors as assessed by both enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay and immunofluorescence analysis. Expression of GRK2 and/or arrestins promoted modest additional CXCR4 internalization in response to both PMA and SDF. Both PMA- and SDF-mediated CXCR4 internalization was inhibited by coexpression of dominant negative mutants of dynamin-1 and arrestin-3. Arrestin was also recruited to the plasma membrane and appeared to colocalize with internalized receptors in response to SDF but not PMA. We then evaluated the ability of CXCR4 receptors containing mutations of serines and threonines, as well as a dileucine motif, within the C-terminal tail to be internalized and phosphorylated in response to either PMA or SDF-1alpha. This analysis showed that multiple residues within the CXCR4 C-terminal tail appear to mediate both PMA- and SDF-1alpha-mediated receptor internalization. The ability of coexpressed GRK2 and arrestins to promote internalization of the CXCR4 mutants revealed distinct differences between respective mutants and suggested that the integrity of the dileucine motif (Ile-328 and Leu-329) and serines 324, 325, 338, and 339 are critical for receptor internalization.     

Arrestin isoforms dictate differential kinetics of A2B adenosine receptor trafficking

Adenosine mediates the activation of adenylyl cyclase via its interaction with specific A(2A) and A(2B) adenosine receptors. Previously, we demonstrated that arrestins are involved in rapid agonist-promoted desensitization of the A(2B) adenosine receptor (A(2B)AR) in HEK293 cells. In the present study, we investigate the role of arrestins in A(2B)AR trafficking. Initial studies demonstrated that HEK293 cells stably expressing arrestin antisense constructs, which reduce endogenous arrestin levels, effectively reduced A(2B)AR internalization. A(2B)AR recycling after agonist-induced endocytosis was also significantly impaired in cells with reduced arrestin levels. Interestingly, while overexpression of arrestin-2 or arrestin-3 rescued A(2B)AR internalization and recycling, arrestin-3 promoted a significantly faster rate of recycling as compared to arrestin-2. The specificity of arrestin interaction with A(2B)ARs was further investigated using arrestins fused to the green fluorescent protein (arr-2-GFP and arr-3-GFP). Both arrestins underwent rapid translocation (<1 min) from the cytosol to the plasma membrane following A(2B)AR activation. However, longer incubations with agonist (>10 min) revealed that arr-2-GFP but not arr-3-GFP colocalized with the A(2B)AR in rab-5 and transferrin receptor containing early endosomes. At later times, the A(2B)AR but not arr-2-GFP was observed in an apparent endocytic recycling compartment. Thus, while arrestin-2 and arrestin-3 mediate agonist-induced A(2B)AR internalization with relative equal potency, arrestin isoform binding dictates the differential kinetics of A(2B)AR recycling and resensitization.     

Inhibition of chemoattractant N-formyl peptide receptor trafficking by active arrestins

Recent studies have highlighted the emergence of a class of G protein-coupled receptors that are internalized in an arrestin-independent manner. In addition to demonstrating that the N-formyl peptide receptor belongs in this family, we have recently shown that recycling of the receptor requires the presence of arrestins. To further elucidate mechanisms of arrestin-dependent regulation of G protein-coupled receptor processing, we examined the effects of altering the receptor-arrestin complex on ternary complex formation and cellular trafficking of the N-formyl peptide receptor by studying two active arrestin-2 mutants (truncated arrestin-2 [1-382], and arrestin-2 I386A, V387A, F388A). Complexes between the N-formyl peptide receptor and active arrestins exhibited higher affinity in vitro than the complex between the N-formyl peptide receptor and wild-type arrestin and furthermore were observed in vivo by colocalization studies using confocal microscopy. To assess the effects of these altered interactions on receptor trafficking, we demonstrated that active, but not wild-type, arrestin expression retards N-formyl peptide receptor internalization. Furthermore, expression of arrestin-2 I386A/V387A/F388A but not arrestin-2 [1-382] inhibited recycling of the N-formyl peptide receptor, reflecting an expanded role for arrestins in G protein-coupled receptor processing and trafficking. Whereas the extent of N-formyl peptide receptor phosphorylation had no effect on the inhibition of internalization, N-formyl peptide receptor recycling was restored when the receptor was only partially phosphorylated. These results indicate not only that a functional interaction between receptor and arrestin is required for recycling of certain G protein-coupled receptors, such as the N-formyl peptide receptor, but that the pattern of receptor phosphorylation further regulates this process.     

Small ubiquitin-like modifier modification of arrestin-3 regulates receptor trafficking

Nonvisual arrestins are regulated by direct post-translational modifications, such as phosphorylation, ubiquitination, and nitrosylation. However, whether arrestins are regulated by other post-translational modifications remains unknown. Here we show that nonvisual arrestins are modified by small ubiquitin-like modifier 1 (SUMO-1) upon activation of β(2)-adrenergic receptor (β(2)AR). Lysine residues 295 and 400 in arrestin-3 fall within canonical SUMO consensus sites, and mutagenic analysis reveals that Lys-400 represents the main SUMOylation site. Depletion of the SUMO E2 modifying enzyme Ubc9 blocks arrestin-3 SUMOylation and attenuates β(2)AR internalization, suggesting that arrestin SUMOylation mediates G protein-coupled receptor endocytosis. Consistent with this, expression of a SUMO-deficient arrestin mutant failed to promote β(2)AR internalization as compared with wild-type arrestin-3. Our data reveal an unprecedented role for SUMOylation in mediating GPCR endocytosis and provide novel mechanistic insight into arrestin function and regulation.     

Seven non-contiguous intracellular residues of the lutropin/choriogonadotropin receptor dictate the rate of agonist-induced internalization and its sensitivity to non-visual arrestins

The amino acid sequences of the human (h) and rat (r) lutropin/choriogonadotropin receptors (LHR) are 87% identical, but the rate of agonist-induced internalization of the hLHR is approximately 7 times faster than that of the rLHR. Chimeras of the hLHR and the rLHR showed that this rate is dictated by the serpentine domain and the cytoplasmic tail. Further mutational analysis identified seven residues, two adjacent residues in the second intracellular loop (Val/Gln in the rLHR and Ile/His in the hLHR), four non-contiguous residues in the third intracellular loop (Arg/Gln/Thr/Pro in the rLHR and Lys/Arg/Met/Thr in the hLHR), and one in the C-terminal tail (Leu in the rLHR and Phe in the hLHR), that are necessary and sufficient to impart the slow rate of internalization of the rLHR and the fast rate of internalization of the hLHR. The internalization of the rLHR and the hLHR display different sensitivities to the non-visual arrestins. Therefore, we also tested if the simultaneous exchange of these seven residues resulted in the exchange of this property. Since this was found to be the case, we propose that these seven residues identified here form a non-visual arrestin-binding site.     

An Eight Amino Acid Segment Controls Oligomerization and Preferred Conformation of the two Non-visual Arrestins

G protein coupled receptors signal through G proteins or arrestins. A long-standing mystery in the field is why vertebrates have two non-visual arrestins, arrestin-2 and arrestin-3. These isoforms are ~75% identical and 85% similar; each binds numerous receptors, and appear to have many redundant functions, as demonstrated by studies of knockout mice. We previously showed that arrestin-3 can be activated by inositol-hexakisphosphate (IP₆). IP₆ interacts with the receptor-binding surface of arrestin-3, induces arrestin-3 oligomerization, and this oligomer stabilizes the active conformation of arrestin-3. Here, we compared the impact of IP₆ on oligomerization and conformational equilibrium of the highly homologous arrestin-2 and arrestin-3 and found that these two isoforms are regulated differently. In the presence of IP₆, arrestin-2 forms “infinite” chains, where each promoter remains in the basal conformation. In contrast, full length and truncated arrestin-3 form trimers and higher-order oligomers in the presence of IP₆; we showed previously that trimeric state induces arrestin-3 activation (Chen et al., 2017). Thus, in response to IP₆, the two non-visual arrestins oligomerize in different ways in distinct conformations. We identified an insertion of eight residues that is conserved across arrestin-2 homologs, but absent in arrestin-3 that likely accounts for the differences in the IP₆ effect. Because IP₆ is ubiquitously present in cells, this suggests physiological consequences, including differences in arrestin-2/3 trafficking and JNK3 activation. The functional differences between two non-visual arrestins are in part determined by distinct modes of their oligomerization. The mode of oligomerization might regulate the function of other signaling proteins.     

Agonist-induced internalization of the metabotropic glutamate receptor 1a is arrestin- and dynamin-dependent

At present, little is known regarding the mechanism of metabotropic glutamate receptor (mGluR) trafficking. To facilitate this characterization we inserted a haemagglutinin (HA) epitope tag in the extracellular N-terminal domain of the rat mGluR1a. In human embryonic kidney cells (HEK293), transiently transfected with HA-mGluR1a, the epitope-tagged receptor was primarily localized to the cell surface prior to agonist stimulation. Following stimulation with glutamate (10 microM; 30 min) the HA-mGluR1a underwent internalization to endosomes. Further quantification of receptor internalization was provided by ELISA experiments which showed rapid agonist-induced internalization of the HA-mGluR1a. To determine whether agonist-induced mGluR1a internalization is an arrestin- and dynamin-dependent process, cells were cotransfected with HA-mGluR1a and either of these dynamin-K44A or arrestin-2 (319-418). Expression of either dominant negative mutant constructs with receptor strongly inhibited glutamate-induced (10 microM; 30 min) HA-mGluR1a internalization. In addition, wild-type arrestin-2-green fluorescent protein (arrestin-2-GFP) or arrestin-3-GFP underwent agonist-induced translocation from cytosol to membrane in HEK293 cells coexpressing HA-mGluR1a. Taken together our observations demonstrate that agonist-induced internalization of mGluR1a is an arrestin- and dynamin-dependent process.     

Internalization and sequestration of the human prostacyclin receptor

Prostacyclin (PGI(2)), the major product of cyclooxygenase in macrovascular endothelium, mediates its biological effects through its cell surface G protein-coupled receptor, the IP. PKC-mediated phosphorylation of human (h) IP is a critical determinant of agonist-induced desensitization (Smyth, E. M., Hong Li, W., and FitzGerald, G. A. (1998) J. Biol. Chem. 273, 23258-23266). The regulatory events that follow desensitization are unclear. We have examined agonist-induced sequestration of hIP. Human IP, tagged at the N terminus with hemagglutinin (HA) and fused at the C terminus to the green fluorescent protein (GFP), was coupled to increased cAMP (EC(50) = 0.39 +/- 0.09 nm) and inositol phosphate (EC(50) = 86. 6 +/- 18.3 nm) generation when overexpressed in HEK 293 cells. Iloprost-induced sequestration of HAhIP-GFP, followed in real time by confocal microscopy, was partially colocalized to clathrin-coated vesicles. Iloprost induced a time- and concentration-dependent loss of cell surface HA, indicating receptor internalization, which was prevented by inhibitors of clathrin-mediated trafficking and partially reduced by cotransfection of cells with a dynamin dominant negative mutant. Sequestration (EC(50) = 27.6 +/- 5.7 nm) was evident at those concentrations of iloprost that induce PKC-dependent desensitization. Neither the PKC inhibitor GF109203X nor mutation of Ser-328, the site for PKC phosphorylation, altered receptor sequestration indicating that, unlike desensitization, internalization is PKC-independent. Deletion of the C terminus prevented iloprost-induced internalization, demonstrating the critical nature of this region for sequestration. Internalization was unaltered by cotransfection of cells with G protein-coupled receptor kinases (GRK)-2, -3, -5, -6, arrestin-2, or an arrestin-2 dominant negative mutant, indicating that GRKs and arrestins do not play a role in hIP trafficking. The hIP is sequestered in response to agonist activation via a PKC-independent pathway that is distinct from desensitization. Trafficking is dependent on determinants located in the C terminus, is GRK/arrestin-independent, and proceeds in part via a dynamin-dependent clathrin-coated vesicular endocytotic pathway although other dynamin-independent pathways may also be involved.