Identification of Escherichia coli Mismatch-specific Uracil DNA Glycosylase as a Robust Xanthine DNA Glycosylase

The gene for the mismatch-specific uracil DNA glycosylase (MUG) was identified in the Escherichia coli genome as a sequence homolog of the human thymine DNA glycosylase with activity against mismatched uracil base pairs. Examination of cell extracts led us to detect a previously unknown xanthine DNA glycosylase (XDG) activity in E. coli. DNA glycosylase assays with purified enzymes indicated the novel XDG activity is attributable to MUG. Here, we report a biochemical characterization of xanthine DNA glycosylase activity in MUG. The wild type MUG possesses more robust activity against xanthine than uracil and is active against all xanthine-containing DNA (C/X, T/X, G/X, A/X and single-stranded X). Analysis of potentials of mean force indicates that the double-stranded xanthine base pairs have a relatively narrow energetic difference in base flipping, whereas the tendency for uracil base flipping follows the order of C/U > G/U > T/U > A/U. Site-directed mutagenesis performed on conserved motifs revealed that Asn-140 and Ser-23 are important determinants for XDG activity in E. coli MUG. Molecular modeling and molecular dynamics simulations reveal distinct hydrogen-bonding patterns in the active site of E. coli MUG that account for the specificity differences between E. coli MUG and human thymine DNA glycosylase as well as that between the wild type MUG and the Asn-140 and Ser-23 mutants. This study underscores the role of the favorable binding interactions in modulating the specificity of DNA glycosylases.     

Repair of the mutagenic DNA oxidation product, 5-formyluracil

The oxidation of the thymine methyl group can generate 5-formyluracil (FoU). Template FoU residues are known to miscode, generating base substitution mutations. The repair of the FoU lesion is therefore important in minimizing mutations induced by DNA oxidation. We have studied the repair of FoU in synthetic oligonucleotides when paired with A and G. In E. coli cell extract, the repair of FoU is four orders of magnitude lower than the repair of U and is similar for both FoU:A and FoU:G base pairs. In HeLa nuclear extract, the repair of FoU:A is similarly four orders of magnitude lower than the repair of uracil, although the FoU:G lesion is repaired 10 times more efficiently than FoU:A. The FoU:G lesion is shown to be repaired by E. coli mismatch uracil DNA glycosylase (Mug), thermophile mismatch thymine DNA glycosylase (Tdg), mouse mismatch thymine DNA glycosylase (mTDG) and human methyl-CpG-binding thymine DNA glycosylase (MBD4), whereas the FoU:A lesion is repaired only by Mug and mTDG. The repair of FoU relative to the other pyrimidines examined here in human cell extract differs from the substrate preferences of the known glycosylases, suggesting that additional, and as yet unidentified glycosylases exist in human cells to repair the FoU lesion. Indeed, as observed in HeLa nuclear extract, the repair of mispaired FoU derived from misincorporation of dGMP across from template FoU could promote rather than minimize mutagenesis. The pathways by which this important lesion is repaired in human cells are as yet unexplained, and are likely to be complex.     

Crystal structure of a thwarted mismatch glycosylase DNA repair complex

The bacterial mismatch-specific uracil-DNA glycosylase (MUG) and eukaryotic thymine-DNA glycosylase (TDG) enzymes form a homologous family of DNA glycosylases that initiate base-excision repair of G:U/T mismatches. Despite low sequence homology, the MUG/TDG enzymes are structurally related to the uracil-DNA glycosylase enzymes, but have a very different mechanism for substrate recognition. We have now determined the crystal structure of the Escherichia coli MUG enzyme complexed with an oligonucleotide containing a non-hydrolysable deoxyuridine analogue mismatched with guanine, providing the first structure of an intact substrate-nucleotide productively bound to a hydrolytic DNA glycosylase. The structure of this complex explains the preference for G:U over G:T mispairs, and reveals an essentially non-specific pyrimidine-binding pocket that allows MUG/TDG enzymes to excise the alkylated base, 3, N(4)-ethenocytosine. Together with structures for the free enzyme and for an abasic-DNA product complex, the MUG-substrate analogue complex reveals the conformational changes accompanying the catalytic cycle of substrate binding, base excision and product release.     

Mismatch uracil glycosylase from Escherichia coli: a general mismatch or a specific DNA glycosylase?

The gene for the mismatch-specific uracil glycosylase (MUG) was identified in the Escherichia coli genome as a sequence homolog of the mammalian thymine DNA glycosylase, with activity against uracil in U.G mismatches. Subsequently, 3,N4-ethenocytosine (epsilonC), thymine, 5-hydroxymethyluracil, and 8-(hydroxymethyl)-3,N4-ethenocytosine have been proposed as possible substrates for this enzyme. The evaluation of various DNA adducts as substrates is complicated by the biphasic nature of the kinetics of this enzyme. Our results demonstrate that product release by the enzyme is very slow and hence comparing the "steady-state" parameters of the enzyme for different substrates is of limited use. Consequently, the ability of the enzyme to excise a variety of damage products of purines and pyrimidines was studied under single turnover conditions. Although the enzyme excised both epsilonC and U from DNA, the former adduct was significantly better as a substrate in terms of binding and hydrolysis. Some products of oxidative and alkylation damage are also moderately good substrates for the enzyme, but thymine is a poor substrate. This comparison of different substrates under single turnover conditions provides a rational basis for comparing substrates of MUG and we relate these conclusions to the known crystal structures of the enzyme and its catalytic mechanism.     

The effect of Pot1 binding on the repair of thymine analogs in a telomeric DNA sequence

Telomeric DNA can form duplex regions or single-stranded loops that bind multiple proteins, preventing it from being processed as a DNA repair intermediate. The bases within these regions are susceptible to damage; however, mechanisms for the repair of telomere damage are as yet poorly understood. We have examined the effect of three thymine (T) analogs including uracil (U), 5-fluorouracil (5FU) and 5-hydroxymethyluracil (5hmU) on DNA–protein interactions and DNA repair within the GGTTAC telomeric sequence. The replacement of T with U or 5FU interferes with Pot1 (Pot1pN protein of Schizosaccharomyces pombe) binding. Surprisingly, 5hmU substitution only modestly diminishes Pot1 binding suggesting that hydrophobicity of the T-methyl group likely plays a minor role in protein binding. In the GGTTAC sequence, all three analogs can be cleaved by DNA glycosylases; however, glycosylase activity is blocked if Pot1 binds. An abasic site at the G or T positions is cleaved by the endonuclease APE1 when in a duplex but not when single-stranded. Abasic site formation thermally destabilizes the duplex that could push a damaged DNA segment into a single-stranded loop. The inability to enzymatically cleave abasic sites in single-stranded telomere regions would block completion of the base excision repair cycle potentially causing telomere attrition.     

Preferential CEBP binding to T:G mismatches and increased C-to-T human somatic mutations

DNA cytosine methylation in mammals modulates gene expression and chromatin accessibility. It also impacts mutation rates, via spontaneous oxidative deamination of 5-methylcytosine (5mC) to thymine. In most cases the resulting T:G mismatches are repaired, following T excision by one of the thymine DNA glycosylases, TDG or MBD4. We found that C-to-T mutations are enriched in the binding sites of CCAAT/enhancer binding proteins (CEBP). Within a CEBP site, the presence of a T:G mismatch increased CEBPβ binding affinity by a factor of >60 relative to the normal C:G base pair. This enhanced binding to a mismatch inhibits its repair by both TDG and MBD4 in vitro. Furthermore, repair of the deamination product of unmethylated cytosine, which yields a U:G DNA mismatch that is normally repaired via uracil DNA glycosylase, is also inhibited by CEBPβ binding. Passage of a replication fork over either a T:G or U:G mismatch, before repair can occur, results in a C-to-T mutation in one of the daughter duplexes. Our study thus provides a plausible mechanism for accumulation of C-to-T human somatic mutations.     

A structural determinant in the uracil DNA glycosylase superfamily for the removal of uracil from adenine/uracil base pairs

The uracil DNA glycosylase superfamily consists of several distinct families. Family 2 mismatch-specific uracil DNA glycosylase (MUG) from Escherichia coli is known to exhibit glycosylase activity on three mismatched base pairs, T/U, G/U and C/U. Family 1 uracil N-glycosylase (UNG) from E. coli is an extremely efficient enzyme that can remove uracil from any uracil-containing base pairs including the A/U base pair. Here, we report the identification of an important structural determinant that underlies the functional difference between MUG and UNG. Substitution of a Lys residue at position 68 with Asn in MUG not only accelerates the removal of uracil from mismatched base pairs but also enables the enzyme to gain catalytic activity on A/U base pairs. Binding and kinetic analysis demonstrate that the MUG-K68N substitution results in enhanced ground state binding and transition state interactions. Molecular modeling reveals that MUG-K68N, UNG-N123 and family 5 Thermus thermophiles UDGb-A111N can form bidentate hydrogen bonds with the N3 and O4 moieties of the uracil base. Genetic analysis indicates the gain of function for A/U base pairs allows the MUG-K68N mutant to remove uracil incorporated into the genome during DNA replication. The implications of this study in the origin of life are discussed.     

Compromised incision of oxidized pyrimidines in liver mitochondria of mice deficient in NTH1 and OGG1 glycosylases

Mitochondrial DNA is constantly exposed to high levels of endogenously produced reactive oxygen species, resulting in elevated levels of oxidative damaged DNA bases. A large spectrum of DNA base alterations can be detected after oxidative stress, and many of these are highly mutagenic. Thus, an efficient repair of these is necessary for survival. Some of the DNA repair pathways involved have been characterized, but others are not yet determined. A DNA repair activity for thymine glycol and other oxidized pyrimidines has been described in mammalian mitochondria, but the nature of the glycosylases involved in this pathway remains unclear. The generation of mouse strains lacking murine thymine glycol-DNA glycosylase (mNTH1) and/or murine 8-oxoguanine-DNA glycosylase (mOGG1), the two major DNA N-glycosylase/apurinic/apyrimidinic (AP) lyases involved in the repair of oxidative base damage in the nucleus, has provided very useful biological model systems for the study of the function of these and other glycosylases in mitochondrial DNA repair. In this study, mouse liver mitochondrial extracts were generated from mNTH1-, mOGG1-, and [mNTH1, mOGG1]-deficient mice to ascertain the role of each of these glycosylases in the repair of oxidized pyrimidine base damage. We also characterized for the first time the incision of various modified bases in mitochondrial extracts from a double-knock-out [mNTH1, mOGG1]-deficient mouse. We show that mNTH1 is responsible for the repair of thymine glycols in mitochondrial DNA, whereas other glycosylase/AP lyases also participate in removing other oxidized pyrimidines, such as 5-hydroxycytosine and 5-hydroxyuracil. We did not detect a backup glycosylase or glycosylase/AP lyase activity for thymine glycol in the mitochondrial mouse extracts.     

Mechanisms of Base Selection by Human Single-stranded Selective Monofunctional Uracil-DNA Glycosylase

hSMUG1 (human single-stranded selective monofunctional uracil-DNA glyscosylase) is one of three glycosylases encoded within a small region of human chromosome 12. Those three glycosylases, UNG (uracil-DNA glycosylase), TDG (thymine-DNA glyscosylase), and hSMUG1, have in common the capacity to remove uracil from DNA. However, these glycosylases also repair other lesions and have distinct substrate preferences, indicating that they have potentially redundant but not overlapping physiological roles. The mechanisms by which these glycosylases locate and selectively remove target lesions are not well understood. In addition to uracil, hSMUG1 has been shown to remove some oxidized pyrimidines, suggesting a role in the repair of DNA oxidation damage. In this paper, we describe experiments in which a series of oligonucleotides containing purine and pyrimidine analogs have been used to probe mechanisms by which hSMUG1 distinguishes potential substrates. Our results indicate that the preference of hSMUG1 for mispaired uracil over uracil paired with adenine is best explained by the reduced stability of a duplex containing a mispair, consistent with previous reports with Escherichia coli mispaired uracil-DNA glycosylase. We have also extended the substrate range of hSMUG1 to include 5-carboxyuracil, the last in the series of damage products from thymine methyl group oxidation. The properties used by hSMUG1 to select damaged pyrimidines include the size and free energy of solvation of the 5-substituent but not electronic inductive properties. The observed distinct mechanisms of base selection demonstrated for members of the uracil glycosylase family help explain how considerable diversity in chemical lesion repair can be achieved.Three glycosylases that initiate DNA repair via the base excision repair (BER)2 pathway are found on human chromosome 12. These three glycosylases are designated as UNG, TDG, and hSMUG1 (1–4). Several groups are currently investigating the structure and properties of these glycosylases in order to determine their physiological roles. A common property of these enzymes is the cleavage of uracil residues from DNA, although each of the glycosylases repairs additional lesions. Despite low sequence homology (8%), these three glycosylases share a common fold and overall architecture (5). Subtle differences in structure apparently distinguish these repair enzymes with respect to substrate and context preferences.UNG is the most active of the glycosylases. UNG recognizes uracil residues when found in single strand, or double strand DNA paired with adenine or mispaired with guanine (6); however, only a small number of other pyrimidines are also targets. UNG is spliced into two forms, UNG1 and UNG2. UNG1 is targeted to the mitochondrion, whereas UNG2 is found primarily in the cell nucleus (7). Due to the capacity of UNG to repair uracil in many contexts, as well as its association with DNA replication machinery and cell cycle specificity, it is thought that a primary role for UNG is in the repair of uracil misincorporated opposite adenine during DNA replication (8, 9). Recent studies also suggest an important role for UNG in removing uracil residues in DNA generated by activation-induced deaminase as part of somatic hypermutation and class switch recombination in activated B-cells (10–12).In contrast to UNG, the related glycosylases hSMUG1 and TDG appear to target uracil and uracil analogs mispaired with guanine (3, 13, 14). Although hSMUG1 was originally characterized as a single strand selective glycosylase (13), more recent studies suggest it is more active on mispaired uracil in duplex DNA (14), and it has an extended substrate range, removing several oxidized pyrimidines (15–18), including 5-hydroxymethyluracil (HmU), 5-formyluracil (FoU), and 5-hydroxyuracil (HoU). TDG appears to act exclusively on duplex substrates, with a strong preference for mispaired pyrimidines, including thymine, and a strong preference for damage located in CpG dinucleotides (19–21). The apparent sequence selectivity of TDG has led to suggestions that the primary role of TDG is the repair of deaminated 5-methylcytosine residues in CpG dinucleotides (20).In this paper, we have investigated the enzymatic properties of recombinant human SMUG1 in single-turnover kinetic assays on a series of oligonucleotide substrates containing purine and pyrimidine analogs. In the first set of experiments, the capacity of hSMUG1 to cleave uracil opposite a series of purine analogs was measured to determine if the preference of hSMUG1 for mispairs can be attributed to reduced duplex stability or if hSMUG1 recognizes specific functional groups on the purine opposite the target uracil. In the second series of experiments, a series of 5-substituted uracil analogs was paired opposite guanine to probe the mechanisms by which hSMUG1 distinguishes potential substrates. This series includes uracil, a series of oxidatively damaged pyrimidines, and the 5-halouracils, which serve to measure both substituent size and electronic inductive properties. New to this series is 5-carboxyuracil (CaU), the last in the sequence of damage products arising from oxidation of the thymine methyl group (22–24).Previous studies with other glycosylases described above have highlighted the importance of size and electronic inductive properties of 5-substituted pyrimidines in substrate selection. In contrast, the capacity of hSMUG1 to recognize HmU but not thymine has been attributed to the hydrophilicity and hydrogen-bonding capacity of the HmU substituent (15–18). In this paper, selected physical properties have been calculated for each pyrimidine examined, including solvent-accessible surface area (SASA) and the free energy of solvation in water. The SASA is introduced as a parameter to define the relative size of the 5-substituted pyrimidines, whereas the free energy of solvation in water is proposed to describe the capacity of the 5-substituted pyrimidine to interact with or replace water within the hSMUG1 pyrimidine binding pocket. The observed kinetic rate constants are compared with the physical properties of the modified bases and base pairs in order to explain the mechanisms by which hSMUG1 identifies and distinguishes target lesions. Our results indicate that the strategies used by hSMUG1 to select target bases and avoid normal bases contrast with those of other members of the uracil DNA-glycosylase family.     

Repair of deaminated base damage by Schizosaccharomyces pombe thymine DNA glycosylase

Thymine DNA glycosylases (TDG) in eukaryotic organisms are known for their double-stranded glycosylase activity on guanine/uracil (G/U) base pairs. Schizosaccharomyces pombe (Spo) TDG is a member of the MUG/TDG family that belongs to a uracil DNA glycosylase superfamily. This work investigates the DNA repair activity of Spo TDG on all four deaminated bases: xanthine (X) and oxanine (O) from guanine, hypoxanthine (I) from adenine, and uracil from cytosine. Unexpectedly, Spo TDG exhibits glycosylase activity on all deaminated bases in both double-stranded and single-stranded DNA in the descending order of X > I > U  O. In comparison, human TDG only excises deaminated bases from G/U and, to a much lower extent, A/U and G/I base pairs. Amino acid substitutions in motifs 1 and 2 of Spo TDG show a significant impact on deaminated base repair activity. The overall mutational effects are characterized by a loss of glycosylase activity on oxanine in all five mutants. L157I in motif 1 and G288M in motif 2 retain xanthine DNA glycosylase (XDG) activity but reduce excision of hypoxanthine and uracil, in particular in C/I, single-stranded hypoxanthine (ss-I), A/U, and single-stranded uracil (ss-U). A proline substitution at I289 in motif 2 causes a significant reduction in XDG activity and a loss of activity on C/I, ss-I, A/U, C/U, G/U, and ss-U. S291G only retains reduced activity on T/I and G/I base pairs. S163A can still excise hypoxanthine and uracil in mismatched base pairs but loses XDG activity, making it the closest mutant, functionally, to human TDG. The relationship among amino acid substitutions, binding affinity and base recognition is discussed.     

Multiple uracil-DNA glycosylase activities in Deinococcus radiodurans

The extremely radiation resistant bacterium, Deinococcus radiodurans, contains a spectrum of genes that encode for multiple activities that repair DNA damage. We have cloned and expressed the product of three predicted uracil-DNA glycosylases to determine their biochemical function. DR0689 is a homologue of the Escherichia coli uracil-DNA glycosylase, the product of the ung gene; this activity is able to remove uracil from a U : G and U : A base pair in double-stranded DNA and uracil from single-stranded DNA and is inhibited by the Ugi peptide. DR1751 is a member of the class 4 family of uracil-DNA glycosylases such as those found in the thermophiles Thermotoga maritima and Archaeoglobus fulgidus. DR1751 is also able to remove uracil from a U : G and U : A base pair; however, it is considerably more active on single-stranded DNA. Unlike its thermophilic relatives, the enzyme is not heat stable. Another putative enzyme, DR0022, did not demonstrate any appreciable uracil-DNA glycosylase activity. DR0689 appears to be the major activity in the organism based on inhibition studies with D. radiodurans crude cell extracts utilizing the Ugi peptide. The implications for D. radiodurans having multiple uracil-DNA glycosylase activities and other possible roles for these enzymes are discussed.     

Germline ablation of SMUG1 DNA glycosylase causes loss of 5-hydroxymethyluracil- and UNG-backup uracil-excision activities and increases cancer predisposition of Ung-/-Msh2-/- mice

Deamination of cytosine (C), 5-methylcytosine (mC) and 5-hydroxymethylcytosine (hmC) occurs spontaneously in mammalian DNA with several hundred deaminations occurring in each cell every day. The resulting potentially mutagenic mispairs of uracil (U), thymine (T) or 5-hydroxymethyluracil (hmU) with guanine (G) are substrates for repair by various DNA glycosylases. Here, we show that targeted inactivation of the mouse Smug1 DNA glycosylase gene is sufficient to ablate nearly all hmU-DNA excision activity as judged by assay of tissue extracts from knockout mice as well as by the resistance of their embryo fibroblasts to 5-hydroxymethyldeoxyuridine toxicity. Inactivation of Smug1 when combined with inactivation of the Ung uracil-DNA glycosylase gene leads to a loss of nearly all detectable uracil excision activity. Thus, SMUG1 is the dominant glycosylase responsible for hmU-excision in mice as well as the major UNG-backup for U-excision. Both Smug1-knockout and Smug1/Ung-double knockout mice breed normally and remain apparently healthy beyond 1 year of age. However, combined deficiency in SMUG1 and UNG exacerbates the cancer predisposition of Msh2(-/-) mice suggesting that when both base excision and mismatch repair pathways are defective, the mutagenic effects of spontaneous cytosine deamination are sufficient to increase cancer incidence but do not preclude mouse development.     

Dynamic opening of DNA during the enzymatic search for a damaged base

Uracil DNA glycosylase (UDG) removes uracil from U.A or U.G base pairs in genomic DNA by extruding the aberrant uracil from the DNA base stack. A question in enzymatic DNA repair is whether UDG and related glycosylases also use an extrahelical recognition mechanism to inspect the integrity of undamaged base pairs. Using NMR imino proton exchange measurements we find that UDG substantially increases the equilibrium constant for opening of T-A base pairs by almost two orders of magnitude relative to free B-DNA. This increase is brought about by enzymatic stabilization of an open state of the base pair without increasing the rate constant for spontaneous base pair opening. These findings indicate a passive search mechanism in which UDG uses the spontaneous opening dynamics of DNA to inspect normal base pairs in a rapid genome-wide search for uracil in DNA.     

Dynamics of uracil and 5-fluorouracil in DNA

The prodrug 5-fluorouracil (5-FU), after activation into 5-F-dUMP, is an extensively used anticancer agent that inhibits thymidylate synthase and leads to increases in dUTP and 5-F-dUTP levels in cells. One mechanism for 5-FU action involves DNA polymerase mediated incorporation of dUTP and 5-F-dUTP into genomic DNA leading to U/A, 5-FU/A, or 5-FU/G base pairs. These uracil-containing lesions are recognized and excised by several human uracil excision repair glycosylases (hUNG2, hSMUG2, and hTDG) leading to toxic abasic sites in DNA that may precipitate cell death. Each of these enzymes uses an extrahelical base recognition mechanism, and previous studies with UNG have shown that extrahelical recognition is facilitated by destabilized base pairs possessing kinetically enhanced base pair opening rates. Thus, the dynamic properties of base pairs containing 5-FU and U are an important unknown in understanding the role of these enzymes in damage recognition and prodrug activation. The pH dependence of the (19)F NMR chemical shift of 5-FU imbedded in a model trinucleotide was used to obtain a pK(a) = 8.1 for its imino proton (10 °C). This is about 1.5 units lower than the imino protons of uracil or thymine and indicates that at neutral pH 5-FU exists significantly as an ionized tautomer that can mispair with guanine during DNA replication. NMR imino proton exchange measurements show that U/A and 5-FU/A base pairs open with rate constants (k(op)) that are 6- and 13-fold faster than a T/A base pair in the same sequence context. In contrast, these same base pairs have apparent opening equilibrium constants (αK(op)) that differ by less than a factor of 2, indicating that the closing rates (k(cl)) are enhanced by nearly equal amounts as k(op). These dynamic measurements are consistent with the previously proposed kinetic trapping model for extrahelical recognition by UNG. In this model, the enhanced intrinsic opening rates of destabilized base pairs allow the bound glycosylase to sample dynamic extrahelical excursions of thymidine and uracil bases as the first step in recognition.     

Chemical approaches toward understanding base excision DNA repair

Despite the importance of DNA repair in protecting the genome, the molecular basis for damage recognition and repair remains poorly understood. In the base excision repair pathway (BER), DNA glycosylases recognize and excise damaged bases from DNA. This review focuses on the recent development of chemical approaches that have been applied to the study of BER enzymes. Several distinctive classes of noncleavable substrate analogs that form stable complexes with DNA glycosylases have recently been designed and synthesized. These analogs have been used for biochemical and structural analyses of protein—DNA complexes involving DNA glycosylases, and for the isolation of a novel DNA glycosylase. An approach to trap covalently a DNA glycosylase-intermediate complex has also been used to elucidate the mechanism of DNA glycosylases.     

Increased spontaneous mutation frequency in human cells expressing the phage PBS2-encoded inhibitor of uracil-DNA glycosylase

The Ugi protein inhibitor of uracil-DNA glycosylase encoded by bacteriophage PBS2 inactivates human uracil-DNA glycosylases (UDG) by forming a tight enzyme:inhibitor complex. To create human cells that are impaired for UDG activity, the human glioma U251 cell line was engineered to produce active Ugi protein. In vitro assays of crude cell extracts from several Ugi-expressing clonal lines showed UDG inactivation under standard assay conditions as compared to control cells, and four of these UDG defective cell lines were characterized for their ability to conduct in vivo uracil-DNA repair. Whereas transfected plasmid DNA containing either a U:G mispair or U:A base pairs was efficiently repaired in the control lines, uracil-DNA repair was not evident in the lines producing Ugi. Experiments using a shuttle vector to detect mutations in a target gene showed that Ugi-expressing cells exhibited a 3-fold higher overall spontaneous mutation frequency compared to control cells, due to increased C:G to T:A base pair substitutions. The growth rate and cell cycle distribution of Ugi-expressing cells did not differ appreciably from their parental cell counterpart. Further in vitro examination revealed that a thymine DNA glycosylase (TDG) previously shown to mediate Ugi-insensitive excision of uracil bases from DNA was not detected in the parental U251 cells. However, a Ugi-insensitive UDG activity of unknown origin that recognizes U:G mispairs and to a lesser extent U:A base pairs in duplex DNA, but which was inactive toward uracil residues in single-stranded DNA, was detected under assay conditions previously shown to be efficient for detecting TDG.     

DNA glycosylase recognition and catalysis

DNA glycosylases are the enzymes responsible for recognizing base lesions in the genome and initiating base excision DNA repair. Recent structural and biochemical results have provided novel insights into DNA damage recognition and repair. The basis of the recognition of the oxidative lesion 8-oxoguanine by two structurally unrelated DNA glycosylases is now understood and has been revealed to involve surprisingly similar strategies. Work on MutM (Fpg) has produced structures representing three discrete reaction steps. The NMR structure of 3-methyladenine glycosylase I revealed its place among the structural families of DNA glycosylases and the X-ray structure of SMUG1 likewise confirmed that this protein is a member of the uracil DNA glycosylase superfamily. A novel disulfide cross-linking strategy was used to obtain the long-anticipated structure of MutY bound to DNA containing an A*oxoG mispair.     

Linear free energy correlations for enzymatic base flipping: how do damaged base pairs facilitate specific recognition?

To efficiently maintain their genomic integrity, DNA repair glycosylases must exhibit high catalytic specificity for their cognate damaged bases using an extrahelical recognition mechanism. One possible contribution to specificity is the weak base pairing and inherent instability of damaged sites which may lead to increased extrahelicity of the damaged base and enhanced recognition of these sites. This model predicts that the binding affinity of the enzyme should increase as the thermodynamic stability of the lesion base pair decreases, because less work is required to extrude the base into its active site. We have tested this hypothesis with uracil DNA glycosylase (UDG) by constructing a series of DNA duplexes containing a single uracil (U) opposite a variety of bases (X) that formed from zero to three hydrogen bonds with U. Linear free energy (LFE) relationships were observed that correlated UDG binding affinity with the entropy and enthalpy of duplex melting, and the dynamic accessibility of the damaged site to chemical oxidation. These LFEs indicate that the increased conformational freedom of the damaged site brought about by enthalpic destabilization of the base pair promotes the formation of extrahelical states that enhance specific recognition by as much as 3000-fold. However, given the small stability differences between normal base pairs and U.A or U.G base pairs, relative base pair stability contributes little to the >10(6)-fold discrimination of UDG for uracil sites in cellular DNA. In contrast, the intrinsic instability of other more egregious DNA lesions may contribute significantly to the specificity of other DNA repair enzymes that bind to extrahelical bases.     

A new pathway expressed during a distinct stage of Drosophila development for the removal of dUMP residues in DNA

In view of removing lesions in DNA produced by the deamination of cytosine to uracil, uracil-DNA glycosylases were anticipated to be ubiquitous. However, an analogous activity in Drosophila melanogaster was not detected. Instead, a nuclease was identified that acts specifically upon DNA containing uracil. The cleavage of uracil-containing DNA by the nuclease generates acid-soluble oligonucleotides in a reaction which can be inhibited by pretreatment of the DNA with Escherichia coli uracil-DNA glycosylase. Uracil-containing DNA with either A:U base pairs or G:U base pairs were susceptible to cleavage by the nuclease, whereas other damaged DNA substrates were not. The nuclease activity is transient and appears only in third instar larvae, with other developmental stages of Drosophila lacking significant levels of the nuclease.