Localization of the human alpha-globin structural gene to chromosome 16 in somatic cell hybrids by molecular hybridization assay

We have used 16 human × mouse somatic cell hybrids containing a variable number of human chromosomes to demonstrate that the human α-globin gene is on chromosome 16. Globin gene sequences were detected by annealing purified human α-globin complementary DNA to DNA extracted from hybrid cells. Human and mouse chromosomes were distinguished by Hoechst fluorescent centromeric banding, and the individual human chromosomes were identified in the same spreads by Giemsa trypsin banding. Isozyme markers for 17 different human chromosomes were also tested in the 16 clones which have been characterized. The absence of chromosomal translocation in all hybrid clones strongly positive for the α-globin gene was established by differential staining of mouse and human chromosomes with Giemsa 11 staining. The presence of human chromosomes in hybrid cell clones which were devoid of human α-globin genes served to exclude all human chromosomes except 6, 9, 14 and 16. Among the clones negative for human α-globin sequences, one contained chromosome 2 (JFA 14a 5), three contained chromosome 4 (AHA 16E, AHA 3D and WAV R4D) and two contained chromosome 5 (AHA 16E and JFA14a 13 5) in >10% of metaphase spreads. These data excluded human chromosomes 2, 4 and 5 which had been suggested by other investigators to contain human globin genes. Only chromosome 16 was present in each one of the three hybrid cell clones found to be strongly positive for the human α-globin gene. Two clones (WAIV A and WAV) positive for the human α-globin gene and chromosome 16 were counter-selected in medium which kills cells retaining chromosome 16. In each case, the resulting hybrid populations lacked both human chromosome 16 and the α-globin gene. These studies establish the localization of the human α-globin gene to chromosome 16 and represent the first assignment of a nonexpressed unique gene by direct detection of its DNA sequences in somatic cell hybrids.     

The structure and position of mouse centromeric heterochromatin in BrdU-labelled chromosomes and diplochromosomes stained by the pH 10.4 method

A mouse cell line of C57B1/6J spontaneous melanoma (clone PG 19), and a C-type virus transformed cell line (G-8 clone 124) originating from normal Balb/c mice were used in a study of the centromeric heterochromatin region of BrdU-labelled chromosomes stained by the Giemsa pH 10.4 method. Three possible explanations for the generation of compound lateral asymmetry within the centromeric heterochromatin region of the laboratory mouse are discussed: 1) inverted translocation; 2) centric fusion followed by paracentromeric fission and 3) inversion of part of the centromeric satellite DNA. These processes could be of considerable genetic and evolutionary significance. The non-random spatial position of unstained and dark stained C-bands in BrdU-labelled diplochromosomes of endoreduplicated cells can be explained as being due to the localization of the old and new DNA chains in a unineme chromatid model. The late replicating regions are shown to be located on the inside of the half-chromatid close to the axial symmetry axis of the metaphase chromosome.     

Assignment of the gene for acid beta-glucosidase to human chromosome 1.

The structural gene for human acid beta-glucosidase (GBA) has been assigned to chromosome 1 using somatic cell hybridization techniques for gene mapping. The human enzyme was detected in mouse RAG cell-human fibroblast cell hybrids by a sensitive double antibody immunoprecipitation assay using a mouse antihuman GBA antibody. No cross-reactivity between mouse beta-glucosidase and human GBA or neutral beta-glucosidase (GBN) was observed. Fifty-two primary, secondary, and tertiary manmouse hybrid lines, derived from three separate fusion experiments, were analyzed for human GBA and enzyme markers for the human chromosomes. Without exception, the presence of human GBA in these hybrid clones was correlated with the presence of human chromosome 1 or its enzymatic markers, phosphoglucomutase 1 (PGM1), and fumarate hydratase (FH). All other human chromosomes were eliminated by the independent segregation of GBA and their respective enzyme markers and/or chromosomes. Using a RAG X human fibroblast line with a mouse-human rearrangement of human chromosome 1, the locus for GBA was limited to the region 1p11 to 1qter.     

Sex-chromosome heterochromatin variation in the wood mouse,Apodemus sylvaticus

Variation in heterochromatin content, as revealed by G- and C-banding, was studied in the sex chromosomes of the wood mouse, Apodemus sylvaticus. The sex-chromosome heterochromatin was also characterized by DAPI staining. Variation in sex chromatin was recorded in extremely large (giant) sex chromosomes in certain individuals and populations. In some individuals, the Y chromosome was the largest element of the complement. Different variants of both the X and Y chromosomes were found within a single population. The variation is therefore a type of population polymorphism and should not be used for taxonomic discrimination.     

Recognition of chromosome 6-associated target structures by human lymphokine-activated killer cells

Different populations of unstimulated and IL-2-activated PBL were used in binding and killing assays against somatic mouse/human lymphocyte cell hybrids containing different human chromosomes. Unstimulated PBL effector cells showed low binding and killing activity to both cell hybrids and mouse parental cell lines. However, IL-2-activated killer (LAK) cells bound strongly to, and effectively killed, cell hybrids carrying human chromosome 6, but were inefficient in both assays to mouse parental cells and to cell hybrids not carrying human chromosome 6. These results show that human LAK cells but not endogenous NK cells bind and kill mouse/human lymphocyte hybrids containing human chromosome 6. We thus suggest that LAK cells recognize ligands encoded by genes on chromosome 6.     

A glutaminase (gis) gene maps to mouse chromosome 1, rat chromosome 9, and human chromosome 2

A rat cDNA clone encoding a portion of phosphate-activated glutaminase was used to identify DNA restriction fragment length polymorphisms (RFLPs) in sets of somatic cell hybrids and between wild-derived and inbred strains of mice. Segregation of rat and mouse chromosomes among somatic cell hybrids indicated assignment to rat chromosome 9 and mouse chromosome 1. Analysis of chromosome 1 alleles for several genes in an interspecific cross between Mus spretus and C3H/HeJ-gld/gld mice indicates that glutaminase can be positioned within 5.5 +/- 2.0 cM proximal to Ctla-4. Similarly, human-hamster somatic cell hybrids were examined for RFLPs, and four human EcoRI restriction fragments were found to hybridize with the rat glutaminase probe. Two of these restriction fragments cosegregated and mapped to human chromosome 2 in a region that is syntenic with mouse chromosome 1 and rat chromosome 9.     

毛冠鹿种内异染色质变化与染色体多态

采用原代和传代培养方法对8头毛冠鹿(Elaphodus cephalophus)的皮肤细胞进行了染色体研究,发现了一种核型与以前所报道的几种核型不一致,确定为一新核型。在该核型中,染色体众数2n=47,2条X染色体异型,一条为端着丝粒,另一条为近端着丝粒。C-带显示该核型中异染色质除了分布在2条X染色体长臂中之外,在第一对大的端着丝粒染色体中的一条近着丝粒区出现一异染色质“柄”。结合C-带及薄层扫描结果对毛冠鹿种内常染色体、性染色体中异染色质的含量和分布与染色体多态的关系进行了探讨。     

A Simple Staining Method for the Analysis of Meiotic Metaphase II Divisions in the Male Mouse

During an investigation into the effects of X rays on meiosis in the male mouse (Szemere and Chandley 1975) a staining technique was required that would enable us to make an accurate analysis of dyads² at metaphase II. Not only were we interested in analysing chromosomal aberrations at this stage, but we also wished to identify with confidence the X and Y chromosomes, and to establish accurate counts of dyad numbers. Conventional staining with carbol fuchsin (Can and Walker 1961) provided adequate means for recognizing sex chromosomes, but centromere positions could not be identified and little morphological detail of autosomal dyads could be discerned. Staining by the BSG barium hydroxide/saline/Giemsa technique (Sumner 1972) as modified for use on meiotic cells of the mouse (Chandley and Fletcher 1973) gave excellent staining of centric heterochromatin, but dyad arms were often pale and indistinct. Other centromere staining methods for murine meiotic cells (Hsu, Cooper, Mace and Brinkley 1971, Polani 1972), gave unsatisfactory results in our hands. By combining carbol fuchsin staining with the BSG centromere staining technique, we have been able to produce a simple and quick technique which gives excellent staining of centromeres, easy identification of X and Y chromosomes and good staining of dyad arms at metaphase II. The technique has also been applied successfully to other meiotic stages of the mouse and to human somatic metaphase chromosomes.     

Preferential fluorescent staining of heterochromatic regions in human chromosomes 9, 15, and the Y by D 287/170

Summary The utility of a newly synthesized chemical variation of DAPI (4-6-diamidino-2-phenyl-indole), D 287/170, for differential staining of constitutive heterochromatin in man is demonstrated. Direct staining of human chromosomes with D 287/170 results in brilliant fluorescence of the paracentromeric C-band of chromosome 9, of a proximal short-arm segment of chromosome 15 and of certain heterochromatic regions in the Y. Bright, but less conspicuous fluorescence is occassionally seen at the centromeres of other chromosomes. The staining differentiation obtained by D 287/170 is very distinct, and the intensity of the fluorescent light is unusually high. The new fluorochrome should prove particularly useful for detecting and analyzing human chromosome 9 heterochromatin at various stages of the cell cycle in normal and structurally altered chromosomes.     

Telomeric repeat organization--a comparative in situ study between man and rodent

Human, hamster, and mouse chromosomes show both similarities and differences in telomeric organization, detectable with a novel version of the PRINS technique. The differences allowed us to investigate the fate of the telomeres on a chromosome from one species when this chromosome was introduced into the cells of another species. For this purpose, we tested telomeres in cell lines of somatic cell hybrids containing human chromosomes on a rodent background, finding that the telomeres on human chromosomes could not be discriminated from the telomeres on rodent chromosomes. All telomeres in the cell lines were much shorter than the telomeres in normal cells. In the mouse-derived cell lines, half of the mouse chromosomes were fused to other mouse chromosomes at the ends of their short arms. At the points of fusion we were generally unable to detect telomeric signals. In these cell lines, we also found a fraction of chromosomes ends with only one telomeric signal. In chromosomes where both ends showed only one signal, the relative orientation of the signals appeared to be nonrandom with respect to sister chromatids.     

Differential staining of plant chromosomes with Giemsa

Simple Giemsa staining techniques for revealing banding patterns in somatic chromosomes of plants are described. The value of the methods in the recognition of heterochromatin was demonstrated using five monocotyledonous and two dicotyledonous species. In Trillium grandiflorum the stronger Giemsa stained chromosome segments were shown to be identical with the heterochromatic regions (H-segments) revealed by cold treatment. Preferential staining of H-segments was also observed in chromosomes from three species of Fritillaria and in Scilla sibirica. Under suitable conditions the chromosomes of Vicia faba displayed a characteristic banding pattern and the bands were identified as heterochromatin. The Giemsa techniques proved to be more sensitive than Quinacrine fluorescence in revealing a longitudinal differentiation of the chromosomes of Crepis capillaris, where plants with and without B-chromosomes were examined. Again all chromosome types had their characteristic bands but there was no difference in Giemsa staining properties between the B-chromosomes and those of the standard complement.     

A simple fluorescence staining technique for the differentiation of human tissue transplanted into nude mice.

Human and mouse nuclei can be distinguished by differences in the constitutive heterochromatin when stained with quinacrine dihydrochloride. With the staining method described, mouse heterochromatin during interphase appears as brilliant fluorescent chromocenters. By replacing the commonly used aqueous buffer mounting medium with a xylene-diluted synthetic resin, the haziness of the nuclear fluorescence is eliminated thus allowing identification of the heterochromatin pattern in histological preparations. A requirement for the definite identification of cells of human or murine origin in the nude mouse is the knowledge that the heterochromatin arrangements changes according to the stage of differentiation of the cell of the position of a particular nucleus within the cell cycle.     

A Simple Fluorescence Staining Technique for the Differentiation of Human Tissue Transplanted Into Nude Mice

Human and mouse nuclei can be distinguished by differences in the constitutive heterochromatin when stained with quinacrine dihydrochloride. With the staining method described, mouse heterochromatin during inter phase appears as brilliant fluorescent chromo-centers. By replacing the commonly used aqueous buffer mounting medium with a xylene-diluted synthetic resin, the haziness of the nuclear fluorescence is eliminated thus allowing identification of the heterochromatin pattern in histological preparations. A requirement for the definite identification of cells of human or murine origin in the nude mouse is the knowledge that the heterochromatin arrangement changes according to the stage of differentiation of the cell or the position of a particular nucleus within the cell cycle.     

Human telomeres replicate using chromosome-specific, rather than universal, replication programs

Telomeric and adjacent subtelomeric heterochromatin pose significant challenges to the DNA replication machinery. Little is known about how replication progresses through these regions in human cells. Using single molecule analysis of replicated DNA (SMARD), we delineate the replication programs-i.e., origin distribution, termination site location, and fork rate and direction-of specific telomeres/subtelomeres of individual human chromosomes in two embryonic stem (ES) cell lines and two primary somatic cell types. We observe that replication can initiate within human telomere repeats but was most frequently accomplished by replisomes originating in the subtelomere. No major delay or pausing in fork progression was detected that might lead to telomere/subtelomere fragility. In addition, telomeres from different chromosomes from the same cell type displayed chromosome-specific replication programs rather than a universal program. Importantly, although there was some variation in the replication program of the same telomere in different cell types, the basic features of the program of a specific chromosome end appear to be conserved.     

Chromosomes and DNA of Microtus. II. Confirmation of deletion of constitutive heterochromatin in M. agrestis cells in vitro

The distribution of constitutive heterochromatin has been examined by C-banding in two somatic cell lines, grown in vitro, from a female Microtus agrestis. One line retains one intact X chromosome together with the short arm of the other X chromosome, while the other cell line retains only the short arm of one X chromosome. Thus, each cell line has lost substantial amounts of heterochromatin from the sex chromosomes, but this material has been deleted from the cells, and not translocated to other chromosomes. Nonetheless, both cell lines continue to propagate well in vitro.     

A Simple Staining Method for the Analysis of Meiotic Metaphase II Divisions in the Male Mouse

During an investigation into the effects of X rays on meiosis in the male mouse (Szemere and Chandley 1975) a staining technique was required that would enable us to make an accurate analysis of dyads² at metaphase II. Not only were we interested in analysing chromosomal aberrations at this stage, but we also wished to identify with confidence the X and Y chromosomes, and to establish accurate counts of dyad numbers. Conventional staining with carbol fuchsin (Can and Walker 1961) provided adequate means for recognizing sex chromosomes, but centromere positions could not be identified and little morphological detail of autosomal dyads could be discerned. Staining by the BSG barium hydroxide/saline/Giemsa technique (Sumner 1972) as modified for use on meiotic cells of the mouse (Chandley and Fletcher 1973) gave excellent staining of centric heterochromatin, but dyad arms were often pale and indistinct. Other centromere staining methods for murine meiotic cells (Hsu, Cooper, Mace and Brinkley 1971, Polani 1972), gave unsatisfactory results in our hands. By combining carbol fuchsin staining with the BSG centromere staining technique, we have been able to produce a simple and quick technique which gives excellent staining of centromeres, easy identification of X and Y chromosomes and good staining of dyad arms at metaphase II. The technique has also been applied successfully to other meiotic stages of the mouse and to human somatic metaphase chromosomes.     

Characterization of constitutive heterochromatin in Cebus apella (Cebidae, Primates) and Pan troglodytes (Hominidae, Primates): comparison to human chromosomes.

Using G bands, some homologies between the chromosomes of Cebus apella (CAP) and human chromosomes are difficult to establish. To solve this problem, we analyzed these homologies by fluorescence in situ hybridization using human whole chromosome probes (ZOO-FISH). The results indicated that 1) the human probe for chromosome 2 partially hybridizes with CAP chromosomes 13 and 5, 2) the human probe for chromosome 3 partially hybridizes with CAP chromosomes 18 and 20, 3) the human probe for chromosome 9 partially hybridizes with CAP chromosome 19, and 4) the human probe for chromosome 14 hybridizes with the p-terminal and q-terminal regions of CAP chromosome 6. However, none of the human probes employed hybridized with the heterochromatic regions of CAP chromosomes. For this reason, we characterized the heterochromatic regions of CAP chromosomes and of the chromosomes of Pan troglodytes (PTR), to allow comparison between CAP, PTR, and human chromosomes using in situ digestion of fixed chromosomes with the restriction enzymes AluI, HaeIII, and RsaI and by fluorescent staining with DA/DAPI. The results show that 1) centromeric heterochromatin is heterogeneous in the three species studied and 2) noncentromeric heterochromatin is homogeneous within each of the three species, but is different for each species. Thus, centromeric heterochromatin undergoes a higher degree of variability than noncentromeric heterochromatin.     

Centromere localization at meiosis and the position of chiasmata in the male and female mouse

Techniques for obtaining differential Giemsa staining of the paracentromeric (p.c.) regions of male and female mouse meiotic chromosomes (centromeric heterochromatin) were explored and standard procedures developed for the different meiotic cells in the two sexes. The best result followed the use of heat at controlled pH in Sörensen's phosphate buffer or in Standard Saline Citrate (SSC) solutions. With these techniques, morphological features of the p.c. regions and their variation were studied in normal animals (CFLP strain) and in a strain (AKR) homozygous for a centric fusion [T(11; ?)-1 Ald] between chromosomes No. 6 and No. 15 (Miller et al., 1971). The Y chromosome was often found to show distinct p. c. staining at first and apparently at second meiotic metaphase, and the X and Y chromosomes were found to associate as bivalents by their long arms. Autosomal p.c. regions showed variation in size which might indicate differences between non-homologous chromosomes but a tendency to similarity between homologues. Differences were found between males and females in respect to proportions and variation of bivalents with single and double chiasmata. The relative positions of chiasmata were different in the two sexes. The presence of the centric fusion in the males did not seem to affect the pairing behaviour of the remaining autosomes or of those taking part in the centric fusion. The possibility is discussed that the p.c. regions, to which also other functions would seem to appertain, may be important for chromosome recognition and pairing, possibly on a quantitative basis.     

Telomere length, chromatin structure and chromosome fusigenic potential

Telomeres are specialized structures at chromosome ends that are thought to function as buffers against chromosome fusion. Several studies suggest that telomere shortening may render chromosomes fusigenic. We used a novel quantitative fluorescence in situ hybridization procedure to estimate telomere length in individual mammalian chromosomes, and G-banding and chromosome painting techniques to determine chromosome fusigenic potential. All analysed Chinese hamster and mouse cell lines exhibited shorter telomeres at short chromosome arms than at long chromosome arms. However, no clear link between short telomeres and chromosome fusigenic potential was observed, i.e. frequencies of telomeric associations were higher in cell lines exhibiting longer telomeres. We speculate that chromosome fusigenic potential in mammalian cell lines may be determined not only by telomere length but also by the status of telomere chromatin structure. This is supported by the observed presence of chromatin filaments linking telomeres in Chinese hamster chromosomes and of multibranched chromosomes oriented end-to-end in the murine severe combined immunodeficient (SCID) cell line. Multibranched chromosomes are the hallmark of the human ICF (Immune deficiency, Centromeric instability, Facial abnormalities) syndrome, characterized by alterations in heterochromatin structure. Received: 13 June 1997; in revised form: 3 August 1997 / Accepted: 4 August 1997     

Telomere directed fragmentation of mammalian chromosomes.

Cloned human telomeric DNA can integrate into mammalian chromosomes and seed the formation of new telomeres. This process occurs efficiently in three established human cell lines and in a mouse embryonic stem cell line. The newly seeded telomeres appear to be healed by telomerase. The seeding of new telomeres by cloned telomeric DNA is either undetectable or very inefficient in non-tumourigenic mouse or human somatic cell lines. The cytogenetic consequences of the seeding of new telomeres include large chromosome truncations but most of the telomere seeding events occur close to the pre-existing ends of natural chromosomes.