The alkaline single cell gel electrophoresis assay with mouse multiple organs: results with 30 aromatic amines evaluated by the IARC and U.S. NTP

The genotoxicity of 30 aromatic amines selected from IARC (International Agency for Research on Cancer) groups 1, 2A, 2B and 3 and from the U.S. NTP (National Toxicology Program) carcinogenicity database were evaluated using the alkaline single cell gel electrophoresis (SCG) (Comet) assay in mouse organs. We treated groups of four mice once orally at the maximum tolerated dose (MTD) and sampled stomach, colon, liver, kidney, bladder, lung, brain, and bone marrow 3, 8 and 24 h after treatment. For the 20 aromatic amines that are rodent carcinogens, the assay was positive in at least one organ, suggesting a high predictive ability for the assay. For most of the SCG-positive aromatic amines, the organs exhibiting increased levels of DNA damage were not necessarily the target organs for carcinogenicity. It was rare, in contrast, for the target organs not to show DNA damage. Organ-specific genotoxicity, therefore, is necessary but not sufficient for the prediction of organ-specific carcinogenicity. For the 10 non-carcinogenic aromatic amines (eight were Ames test-positive and two were Ames test-negative), the assay was negative in all organs studied. In the safety evaluation of chemicals, it is important to demonstrate that Ames test-positive agents are not genotoxic in vivo. Chemical carcinogens can be classified as genotoxic (Ames test-positive) and putative non-genotoxic (Ames test-negative) carcinogens. The alkaline SCG assay, which detects DNA lesions, is not suitable for identifying non-genotoxic carcinogens. The present SCG study revealed a high positive response ratio for rodent genotoxic carcinogens and a high negative response ratio for rodent genotoxic non-carcinogens. These results suggest that the alkaline SCG assay can be usefully used to evaluate the in vivo genotoxicity of chemicals in multiple organs, providing for a good assessment of potential carcinogenicity.     

A comparison of intraperitoneal and oral gavage administration in comet assay in mouse eight organs

One of the important advantages of the comet assay is its ability to detect genotoxicity in many different organs. Since the exposure route of the test compounds is likely to influence the genotoxicity detected in a given organ, it is an important factor to consider when conducting the assay. In this study, we compared the effects of numerous model compounds on eight organs when administered to mice by intraperitoneal (i.p.) injection and oral (p.o.) gavage.Groups of four mice were treated once i.p. or p.o. at the identical proportion of LD50 for each route, and the stomach, colon, liver, kidney, bladder, lung, brain, and bone marrow were sampled 3, 8, and 24h after treatment. For 19 of the 20 tested mutagens with various modes of action, genotoxicity in some organs varied with treatment route; only the genotoxicity of methyl methane sulfonate was not affected. Treatment route, however, did not produce a qualitative difference in the genotoxicity of promutagens at the sites of conversion to ultimate mutagens, with aromatic hydrocarbons as the exception. When chemicals with positive responses in at least one organ were considered to be comet assay-positive, the administration route made no difference. Since azo reduction is mediated by azo reductase synthesized in the gastrointestinal wall and by gut microflora and i.p.-administered azo dyes bypass their activation site (colon), the administration route is expected to make a difference in their in vivo genotoxicity. Direct-acting mutagens are expected to affect the mucosa of the gastrointestinal tract when given p.o. For those mutagens, however, the administration route did not make a qualitative difference in gastrointestinal tract genotoxicity. Moreover, although the gastrointestinal mucosa is the first site to be exposed to p.o. administered agents, the peak times in the stomach tended to be the same as in most other organs. Based on those results, we concluded that the genotoxicity at high exposures was due to a systemic effect, and that both routes are acceptable for the comet assay when the liver and gastrointestinal organs are sampled, so long as appropriate dose levels for systemic exposure are selected for each route.     

Genotoxicity and carcinogenicity studies of antihypertensive agents

This survey is a compendium of genotoxicity and carcinogenicity information of antihypertensive drugs. Data from 164 marketed drugs were collected. Of the 164 drugs, 65 (39.6%) had no retrievable genotoxicity or carcinogenicity data; this group was comprised largely of drugs marketed in a limited number of countries. The remaining 99 (60.4%) had at least one genotoxicity or carcinogenicity test result. Of these 99, 48 (48.5%) had at least one positive finding: 32 tested positive in at least one genotoxicity assay, 26 in at least one carcinogenicity assay, and 10 gave a positive result in both at least one genotoxicity assay and at least one carcinogenicity assay. In terms of correlation between results of the various genotoxicity assays and absence of carcinogenic activity in both mice and rats 2 of 44 non-carcinogenic drugs tested positive in the in vitro bacterial mutagenesis assay, 2 of 9 tested positive in the mouse lymphoma assay, none of 14 tested positive for gene mutation at the hprt locus, 5 of 25 tested positive in in vitro cytogenetic assays, none of 31 in in vivo cytogenetic assays, and none of 14 in inducing DNA damage and/or repair in in vitro and/or in vivo assays. Concerning the predictivity of genetic toxicology findings for long-term carcinogenesis assays, 75 drugs had both genotoxicity and carcinogenicity data; of these 37 (49.3%) were neither genotoxic nor carcinogenic, 14 (18.7%) were non-carcinogens which tested positive in at least one genotoxicity assay, 14 (18.7%) were carcinogenic in at least one sex of mice or rats but tested negative in genotoxicity assays, and 10 (13.3%) were both genotoxic and carcinogenic. Only 42 of the 164 marketed antihypertensives (25.6%) had all data required by the guidelines for testing of pharmaceuticals.     

The alkaline single cell electrophoresis assay with eight mouse organs: results with 22 mono-functional alkylating agents (including 9 dialkyl N-nitrosoamines) and 10 DNA crosslinkers

The genotoxicity of 22 mono-functional alkylating agents (including 9 dialkyl N-nitrosoamines) and 10 DNA crosslinkers selected from IARC (International Agency for Research on Cancer) groups 1, 2A, and 2B was evaluated in eight mouse organs with the alkaline single cell gel electrophoresis (SCGE) (comet) assay. Groups of four mice were treated once intraperitoneally at the dose at which micronucleus tests had been conducted, and the stomach, colon, liver, kidney, bladder, lung, brain, and bone marrow were sampled 3, 8, and/or 24 h later. All chemicals were positive in the SCGE assay in at least one organ. Of the 22 mono-functional alkylating agents, over 50% were positive in all organs except the brain and bone marrow. The two subsets of mono-functional alkylating agents differed in their bone marrow genotoxicity: only 1 of the 9 dialkyl N-nitrosoamines was positive in bone marrow as opposed to 8 of the 13 other alkylating agents, reflecting the fact that dialkyl N-nitrosoamines are poor micronucleus inducers in hematopoietic cells. The two groups of mono-functional alkylating agents also differ in hepatic carcinogenicity in spite of the fact that they are similar in hepatic genotoxicity. While dialkyl N-nitrosoamines produce tumors primarily in mouse liver, only one (styrene-7,8-oxide) out of 10 of the other type of mono-functional alkylating agents is a mouse hepatic carcinogen. Taking into consideration our previous results showing high concordance between hepatic genotoxicity and carcinogenicity for aromatic amines and azo compounds, a possible explanation for the discrepancy might be that chemicals that require metabolic activation show high concordance between genotoxicity and carcinogenicity in the liver. A high percent of the 10 DNA crosslinkers were positive in the SCGE assay in the gastrointestinal mucosa, but less than 50% were positive in the liver and lung. In this study, we allowed 10 min alkali-unwinding to obtain low and stable control values. Considering that DNA crosslinking lesions can be detected as lowering of not only positive but also negative control values, low control values by short alkali-treatment might make it difficult to detect DNA crosslinking lesions. In conclusion, although both mono-functional alkylating agents and DNA crosslinkers are genotoxic in mouse multiple organs, the genotoxicity of DNA crosslinkers can be detected in the gastrointestinal organs even though they were given intraperitoneally followed by the short alkali-treatment.     

Update on genotoxicity and carcinogenicity testing of 472 marketed pharmaceuticals

This survey is a compendium of genotoxicity and carcinogenicity information of 838 marketed drugs, whose expected clinical use is continuous for at least 6 months or intermittent over an extended period of time. Of these 838 drugs, 366 (43.7%) do not have retrievable genotoxicity or carcinogenicity data. The remaining 472 (56.3%) have at least one genotoxicity or carcinogenicity test result. Of the 449 drugs with at least one genotoxicity test result, 183 (40.8%) have at least one positive finding. Of the 338 drugs with at least one carcinogenicity test result, 160 (47.3%) have at least one positive result. Concerning the predictivity of genetic toxicology findings for long-term carcinogenesis assays, of the 315 drugs which have both genotoxicity and carcinogenicity data 116 (36.8%) are neither genotoxic nor carcinogenic, 50 (15.9%) are non-carcinogens which test positive in at least one genotoxicity assay, 75 (23.8%) are carcinogenic in at least one sex of mice or rats but test negative in genotoxicity assays, and 74 (23.5%) are both genotoxic and carcinogenic. Only 208 (24.8%) of the 838 drugs considered have all data required by current guidelines for testing of pharmaceuticals. However, it should be noted that a large fraction of the drugs considered were developed and marketed prior to the present regulatory climate. Although the laws do not require re-testing based on revised standards, in the absence of epidemiological studies excluding a carcinogenic risk to humans, a re-evalutation would be appropriate.     

Enhanced prediction of potential rodent carcinogenicity by utilizing comet assay and apoptotic assay in combination

The comet assay has been recently validated as a sensitive and specific test system for the quantification of DNA damage. The objectives of this study are to investigate the utility of comet assay for detecting mutagens with 11 substances that demonstrated positive results in at least one test among four standard short-term genotoxicity tests, and to evaluate its ability to predict rodent carcinogenicity. Out of 11 test substances, positive comet results were obtained for colchicine, hydroxyurea and actinomycin D. No effect on DNA migration, determined as the tail moment, was found with theophylline or 2,4-dinitrophenol. Bisphenol A, vinblastine, paclitaxel and p-anisidine appeared cytotoxic clastogens because these induced tail moment at concentrations showing 60% or less cell survival. In addition, among three test substances showing the bimodal distribution of DNA damage, which is a characteristic of apoptosis, true apoptosis result was obtained for camptothecin and dexamethasone with the Annexin V affinity assay. With this limited data-set, an investigation into the predictive value of these short-term genotoxicity tests for determining the carcinogenicity showed that comet assay has relatively high sensitivity and superior specificity to other four short-term genotoxicity assay. Therefore, our data suggest that comet assay, especially in combination with apoptotic assay, would be a good predictive test to minimize false-positives in evaluation of the potential rodent carcinogenicity.     

32P-postlabelling analysis of DNA adducts from Fischer-344 rats administered 2,4-diaminotoluene.

Using 32P-postlabelling and thin layer chromatography, DNA adduct formation by the potent animal carcinogen 2,4-diaminotoluene in Fischer-344 rats was investigated. DNA from four different organs, liver, mammary gland, kidney and lung, were examined for adducts following single administration of this compound. DNA binding was detected in all four organs, with each producing one major and two minor adduct spots on autoradiograms. The adducts induced were qualitatively identical among the different organs, but quantitative differences were observed. The two target organs of 2,4-diaminotoluene induced carcinogenesis, the liver and mammary gland produced higher adduct yields, with levels up to 30-times higher than those for the two non-target organs. Since the liver is the principal target for 2,4-diaminotoluene induced carcinogenesis, we further examined DNA adducts from this site for the effects of different doses and time points. DNA binding in liver was detected following doses as low as 4.1 mumol/kg. At the highest concentration examined (2046 mumol/kg), the level of the major adduct was 29.2 adducted nucleotides per 10(7) total nucleotides. The yields for the two minor adducts were approximately one-tenth that for the major adduct. Following a 410 mumol/kg dose, DNA adduct removal over time was examined. DNA adduct removal exhibited biphasic kinetics, with a rapid initial phase followed by a slower rate of elimination. Up to 60% of maximum adduct levels persisted after 2 weeks. DNA binding by 2,4-diaminotoluene was also compared to that by its weakly carcinogenic analog, 2,4-dinitrotoluene. The two compounds produced identical adduct patterns, suggesting that they share common metabolites and adducts. Adduct yields from 2,4-dinitrotoluene, however, were lower. The results of our studies suggest that the differences in carcinogenic potency between 2,4-diaminotoluene and 2,4-dinitrotoluene, as well as the organotropic effects of 2,4-diaminotoluene may be explained, in part, by quantitative differences in the extent of DNA adduct formation.     

The comet assay in eight mouse organs: results with 24 azo compounds

The genotoxicity of 24 azo compounds selected from IARC (International Agency for Research on Cancer) groups 2A, 2B, and 3 were determined by the comet (alkaline single cell gel electrophoresis, SCG) assay in eight mouse organs. We treated groups of four mice once orally at the maximum tolerated dose (MTD) and sampled stomach, colon, liver, kidney, bladder, lung, brain, and bone marrow 3, 8, and 24 h after treatment. For the 17 azo compounds, the assay was positive in at least one organ; (1) 14 and 12 azo compounds induced DNA damage in the colon and liver, respectively, (2) the genotoxic effect of most of them was greatest in the colon, and (3) there were high positive responses in the gastrointestinal organs, but those organs are not targets for carcinogenesis. One possible explanation for this discrepancy is that the assay detects DNA damage induced shortly after administration of a relatively high dose, while carcinogenicity is detected after long treatment with relatively low doses. The metabolic enzymes may become saturated following high doses and the rates and pathways of metabolic activation and detoxification may differ following high single doses vs. low long-term doses. Furthermore, considering that spontaneous colon tumors are very rare in rats and mice, the ability to detect tumorigenic effects in the colon of those animals might be lower than the ability to detect genotoxic events in the comet assay. The in vivo comet assay, which has advantage of reflecting test chemical absorption, distribution, and excretion as well as metabolism, should be effective for estimating the risk posed by azo dyes to humans in spite of the difference in dosage regimen.     

The genotoxicity of a variety of aniline derivatives in a DNA repair test with primary cultured rat hepatocytes

The genotoxicity of a variety of aniline derivatives was examined by a DNA repair test with rat hepatocytes. Out of 37 aniline derivatives, 6 chemicals, i.e., 2,4,6-trimethylaniline (mesidine), 2,4-xylidine, 3,5-diaminobenzoic acid, 3,4-diaminochlorobenzene, 2-chloro-4-methylaniline and 4-chloro-N-methylaniline, elicited positive DNA repair responses. The results are in agreement with the bacterial mutagenicities with or without norharman of these compounds. Positive compounds of unknown carcinogenicity in the present assay, i.e., 3,5-diaminobenzoic acid, 2-chloro-4-methylaniline and 4-chloro-N-methylaniline are suspected of being potentially carcinogenic.     

A Novel Open Tubular Capillary Electrochromatographic Method for Differentiating the DNA Interaction Affinity of Environmental Contaminants

The interaction of chemicals with DNA may lead to genotoxicity, mutation or carcinogenicity. A simple open tubular capillary electrochromatographic method is proposed to rapidly assess the interaction affinity of three environmental contaminants (1,4-phenylenediamine, pyridine and 2,4-diaminotoluene) to DNA by measuring their retention in the capillaries coated with DNA probes. DNA oligonucleotide probes were immobilized on the inner wall of a fused silica capillary that was first derivatized with 3-(aminopropyl)-triethoxysilane (APTES). The difference in retention times and factors was considered as the difference in interaction affinity of the contaminants to the DNA probes. The interaction of the contaminants with both double-stranded (dsDNA) and single-stranded DNA (ssDNA) coatings was compared. Retention factors of 1,4-phenylenediamine, pyridine and 2,4-diaminotoluene in the capillary coated with ssDNA probe were 0.29, 0.42, and 0.44, respectively. A similar trend was observed in the capillary coated with dsDNA, indicating that 2,4-diaminotoluene has the highest affinity among the three contaminants. The relative standard deviation (RSD) for the retention factors was in the range of 0.05–0.69% (n = 3). The results demonstrated that the developed technique could be applied for preliminary screening purpose to provide DNA interaction affinity information of various environmental contaminants.     

Induction of LacZ mutations in Muta Mouse can distinguish carcinogenic from non-carcinogenic analogues of diaminotoluenes and nitronaphthalenes

2,4-Diaminotoluene (2,4-DAT) is a liver carcinogen in rats and mice whereas 2,6-DAT is not. Both are genotoxic in vitro. Tests for mutations in transgenic mice, unscheduled DNA synthesis (UDS), DNA damage and enhancement of initiated foci in vivo have shown some discrimination between these two analogues, but only after oral administration. 1- and 2-nitronaphthalene (1- and 2-NNT) are also both genotoxic in vitro, although, unlike 2,4- and 2,6-DAT, they do not require metabolic activation. There is some evidence that 2-NNT may be able to induce liver and bladder tumours, and there is some evidence that 1-NNT is not carcinogenic to rats or mice, but none of the data are convincing. When tested for induction of LacZ mutations in Muta Mouse after topical exposure (human occupational exposure route) at their maximum tolerated doses, 2,4-DAT induced a positive response in liver and a marginal response in kidney, whereas 2,6-DAT was negative. 2-NNT also induced a positive mutagenic response in liver, and a marginal response in bladder, whereas 1-NNT was negative. Neither 2,4- nor 2,6-DAT induced mutations at the site of application (skin) as might be expected for chemicals requiring activation by liver enzymes. 2-NNT, which is a direct-acting mutagen in vitro, gave a marginal response for induced mutation at the site of application, but 1-NNT was negative. This study shows that investigation of induction of LacZ mutations after topical application in vivo can provide useful data to help discriminate potentially carcinogenic from non-carcinogenic chemicals that are mutagenic in vitro. Robust carcinogenicity data are needed to determine whether 2-NNT can induce tumours in the liver and bladder.     

Tests for genotoxicity and mutagenicity of furan and its metabolite cis-2-butene-1,4-dial in L5178Y tk+/- mouse lymphoma cells

Furan is found in various food items and is cytotoxic and carcinogenic in the liver of rats and mice. Metabolism of furan includes the formation of an unsaturated dialdehyde, cis-2-butene-1,4-dial (BDA). In view of the multifunctional electrophilic reactivity of BDA, adduct formation with protein and DNA may explain some of the toxic effects. Short-term tests for genotoxicity of furan in mammalian cells are inconclusive, little is known for BDA. We investigated BDA generated by hydrolysis of 2,5-diacetoxy-2,5-dihydrofuran for genotoxicity in L5178Y tk+/- mouse lymphoma cells using standard procedures for the comet assay, the micronucleus test, and the mouse lymphoma thymidine kinase gene mutation assay, using 4-h incubation periods. Cytotoxicity was remarkable: cell viability at concentrations>or=50 microM was reduced to <50%. In the dose range up to 25 microM, viability was >90%. Measures of comet-tail length and thymidine-kinase mutant frequency were increased 1.6- and 2.4-fold above control, respectively. Analysis of three fully independent replicates with a linear mixed-effects model showed a highly significant increase with concentration for both endpoints. Compared to methyl methanesulfonate used as a positive control, BDA was of similar potency with respect to genotoxicity, but it was much more cytotoxic. Furan added to cell cultures at doses that resulted in time-averaged effective concentrations of up to 3100 microM was neither cytotoxic nor genotoxic. A potential cross-linking activity of BDA was investigated by checking whether gamma radiation-induced DNA migration in the comet assay could be reduced by pre-treatment with BDA. In contrast to the effect of the positive control glutaraldehyde, BDA treatment did not reduce the comet tail length. On the contrary, an increase was observed at >or=100 microM BDA, which was attributable to early apoptotic cells. Although BDA was found to be a relatively potent genotoxic agent in terms of the concentration necessary to double the background measures, cytotoxicity strongly limited the concentration range that produced interpretable results. This may explain some of the inconclusive results and indicates that non-genotoxic effects must be taken into account in the discussion of the modes of toxic and carcinogenic action of furan.     

Genotoxicity of o-aminoazotoluene (AAT) determined by the Ames test, the in vitro chromosomal aberration test, and the transgenic mouse gene mutation assay

o-Aminoazotoluene (AAT) has been evaluated as a possible human carcinogen (Class 2B) by the International Agency for Research on Cancer (IARC). The Ames test found it to be mutagenic in the presence of a metabolic activation system, whereas it has little clastogenicity either in vitro or in vivo in the chromosomal aberration assay. AAT is also carcinogenic in the lung or liver of mice and rats given long-term administrations. Therefore, metabolites generated in the liver etc. may have gene mutation activity, and carcinogenesis would occur. We examined the mutagenicity of AAT in a gene mutation assay, using lacZ transgenic mice (MutaMice) and a positive selection method. AAT showed positive results for organs with metabolic functions, such as liver and colon and other organs. Positive results were also seen in an Ames test in the presence of metabolic activation and negative results seen in a chromosomal aberration test. Therefore, AAT had the potential to cause gene mutation in the presence of metabolic activation systems in vitro and the same reaction was confirmed in vivo with organs with metabolic function, such as liver and colon, but little clastogenicity in vitro or in vivo. Thus, metabolites with gene mutation activity may be responsible for the carcinogenicity of AAT. The transgenic mouse mutation assay proved to be useful for concurrent assessment of in vivo mutagenicity in multiple organs and to supplement the standard in vivo genotoxicity tests, such as the micronucleus assay which is limited to bone marrow as the only target organ.     

DNA damage and DNA adduct formation in rat tissues following oral administration of acrylamide

Acrylamide is present as a contaminant in the human diet in heated food products. It has been found to be carcinogenic in laboratory rats and has been classified as probably carcinogenic in humans. In order to clarify the possible involvement of a primary genotoxic mechanism in acrylamide-induced carcinogenicity, both the presence of DNA damage, measured by the comet assay, and the formation of N7-(2-carbamoyl-2-hydroxyethyl)guanine (N7-GA-Gua) and N3-(2-carbamoyl-2-hydroxyethyl)adenine (N3-GA-Ade), derived from reaction of the active metabolite glycidamide (GA) with the DNA, analyzed by LC/MS/MS, were assessed in selected rat tissues. Rats were administered with single oral doses of acrylamide (18, 36 or 54 mg/kg body weight (b.w.) and the organs (blood leukocytes, brain, bone marrow, liver, testes and adrenals) were sampled at different times after treatment. Results from GA-induced DNA adduct measurements indicated a relatively even organ distribution of the adducts in brain, testes and liver. Organ-specificity in acrylamide carcinogenesis can therefore not be explained by a selective accumulation of GA-DNA adducts in the target organs, at least not after a single dose exposure. The DNA adduct profiles and half-lives were similar in the different organs; except that the N3-GA-Ade adduct was more rapidly removed from tissues than the N7-GA-Gua adduct. Increased extent of DNA migration, as measured by the in vivo rat comet assay, was found in brain and testes, and these specific results seem to be in accordance with the known organ-specificity in acrylamide carcinogenesis in rat. Only weak and transient DNA damage was recorded in the liver, bone marrow and adrenals. The DNA-damaging effect of the compound observed in the blood leukocytes could be a simple biomarker of acrylamide exposure and genotoxicity.     

The non-genotoxicity to rodents of the potent rodent bladder carcinogens o-anisidine and p-cresidine.

The two potent rodent bladder carcinogens o-anisidine and p-cresidine, and the structurally related non-carcinogen 2,4-dimethoxyaniline, have been extensively evaluated for genotoxicity to rodents and found to be inactive. Most data were generated on o-anisidine, an agent that is also only marginally genotoxic in vitro. The two carcinogens induced methaemoglobinaemia in rodents indicating that the chemicals are absorbed and metabolically oxidized. Despite their total lack of genotoxicity in vivo, the two carcinogens have the hall-marks of being genotoxic carcinogens given that most test animals of both sexes of B6C3F1 mice and F344 rats are reported to have succumbed rapidly to malignant bladder cancer. No reasons for this dramatic conflict of test data are so far apparent. The experiments described involve, in one or other combination, 2 strains of mice (including B6C3F1) and 4 strains of rat (including F344), the use of oral and i.p routes of exposure and observations made after 1, 3 or 6 doses of test chemical. 6 tissues (including the rat bladder) were assayed using 3 genetic endpoints (unscheduled DNA synthesis, DNA single-strand breaks and micronuclei induction). Aroclor-induced rats were employed in one set of experiments with o-anisidine. In the case of one set of mouse bone-marrow micronucleus experiments the same batch of the 3 chemicals as used in the cancer bioassays, and the same strain of mouse, were used. Possible further experiments and the implications of these findings are discussed.     

Diaminotoluenes induce intrachromosomal recombination and free radicals in Saccharomyces cerevisiae

The carcinogenicity of aniline-based aromatic amines is poorly reflected by their activity in short-term mutagenicity assays such as the Salmonella typhimurium reverse mutation (Ames) assay. More information about the mechanism of action of such carcinogens is needed. Here we report the effects on DEL recombination in Saccharomyces cerevisiae of the carcinogen 2,4-diaminotoluene and its structural isomer 2,6-diaminotoluene, which is reported to be non-carcinogenic. Both compounds are detected as equally mutagenic in the Salmonella assay. In the absence of any external metabolizing system both compounds were recombinagenic in the DEL assay, with the carcinogen being a more potent inducer of deletions than the non-carcinogen. In the presence of Aroclor-induced rat liver S9, however, the carcinogen 2,4-diaminotoluene became a 2-fold more potent inducer of deletions, and the non-carcinogen 2,6-diaminotoluene was rendered less toxic and no induced recombination was observed. 2,4-Diaminotoluene is distinguished from its non-carcinogen analog in the DEL assay, therefore, on the basis of a preferential activation of the carcinogen in the presence of a rat liver microsomal metabolizing system. Free radical species are produced by several carcinogens and have been implicated in carcinogenesis. We further investigated whether exposure of yeast to either 2,4-diaminotoluene or 2,6-diaminotoluene resulted in a rise in intracellular free radical species. The effects of the free radical scavenger N-acetylcysteine on toxicity and recombination induced by the two compounds and intracellular oxidation of the free radical-sensitive reporter compound dichlorofluorescin diacetate were studied. Both 2,4- and 2,6-diaminotoluene produced free radical species in yeast, indicating that the reason for the differential activity of the compounds for induced deletions is not reflected in any difference in the production of free radical species.     

Tests for genotoxicity and mutagenicity of furan and its metabolite cis-2-butene-1,4-dial in L5178Y tk mouse lymphoma cells

Furan is found in various food items and is cytotoxic and carcinogenic in the liver of rats and mice. Metabolism of furan includes the formation of an unsaturated dialdehyde, cis-2-butene-1,4-dial (BDA). In view of the multifunctional electrophilic reactivity of BDA, adduct formation with protein and DNA may explain some of the toxic effects. Short-term tests for genotoxicity of furan in mammalian cells are inconclusive, little is known for BDA. We investigated BDA generated by hydrolysis of 2,5-diacetoxy-2,5-dihydrofuran for genotoxicity in L5178Y tk^+/− mouse lymphoma cells using standard procedures for the comet assay, the micronucleus test, and the mouse lymphoma thymidine kinase gene mutation assay, using 4-h incubation periods. Cytotoxicity was remarkable: cell viability at concentrations ≥50 μM was reduced to <50%. In the dose range up to 25 μM, viability was >90%. Measures of comet-tail length and thymidine–kinase mutant frequency were increased 1.6- and 2.4-fold above control, respectively. Analysis of three fully independent replicates with a linear mixed-effects model showed a highly significant increase with concentration for both endpoints. Compared to methyl methanesulfonate used as a positive control, BDA was of similar potency with respect to genotoxicity, but it was much more cytotoxic. Furan added to cell cultures at doses that resulted in time-averaged effective concentrations of up to 3100 μM was neither cytotoxic nor genotoxic. A potential cross-linking activity of BDA was investigated by checking whether gamma radiation-induced DNA migration in the comet assay could be reduced by pre-treatment with BDA. In contrast to the effect of the positive control glutaraldehyde, BDA treatment did not reduce the comet tail length. On the contrary, an increase was observed at ≥100 μM BDA, which was attributable to early apoptotic cells. Although BDA was found to be a relatively potent genotoxic agent in terms of the concentration necessary to double the background measures, cytotoxicity strongly limited the concentration range that produced interpretable results. This may explain some of the inconclusive results and indicates that non-genotoxic effects must be taken into account in the discussion of the modes of toxic and carcinogenic action of furan.     

Animal carcinogenicity studies: 2. Obstacles to extrapolation of data to humans

Due to limited human exposure data, risk classification and the consequent regulation of exposure to potential carcinogens has conventionally relied mainly upon animal tests. However, several investigations have revealed animal carcinogenicity data to be lacking in human predictivity. To investigate the reasons for this, we surveyed 160 chemicals possessing animal but not human exposure data within the US Environmental Protection Agency chemicals database, but which had received human carcinogenicity assessments by 1 January 2004. We discovered the use of a wide variety of species, with rodents predominating, and of a wide variety of routes of administration, and that there were effects on a particularly wide variety of organ systems. The likely causes of the poor human predictivity of rodent carcinogenicity bioassays include: 1) the profound discordance of bioassay results between rodent species, strains and genders, and further, between rodents and human beings; 2) the variable, yet substantial, stresses caused by handling and restraint, and the stressful routes of administration common to carcinogenicity bioassays, and their effects on hormonal regulation, immune status and predisposition to carcinogenesis; 3) differences in rates of absorption and transport mechanisms between test routes of administration and other important human routes of exposure; 4) the considerable variability of organ systems in response to carcinogenic insults, both between and within species; and 5) the predisposition of chronic high dose bioassays toward false positive results, due to the overwhelming of physiological defences, and the unnatural elevation of cell division rates during ad libitum feeding studies. Such factors render profoundly difficult any attempts to accurately extrapolate human carcinogenic hazards from animal data.     

The unique role of rodents in the detection of possible human carcinogens and mutagens

Some of the probable reasons underlying the observation that not all chemicals shown to be genotoxic in vitro are capable of eliciting tumours in rodents or humans are discussed using appropriate examples. It is suggested that a substantial proportion of the resources currently available for conducting rodent carcinogenicity bioassays should be employed in the short-term evaluation in vivo of some of the many hundreds of chemicals recently defined as genotoxic in vitro, rather than in the protracted evaluation of a few chemicals, often of unknown activity in vitro, for carcinogenicity. A decision tree approach to the evaluation of chemicals for human mutagenic/carcinogenic potential is presented which is at variance with the construction and philosophy of many of the current legislative guidelines. The immediate need for the adoption of one of the available short-term in vivo liver assays, and/or the development of a short-term in vivo rodent assay capable of concomitantly monitoring different genetic end-points in a range of organs or tissues is emphasized.     

Threshold effects in genetic toxicity: perspective of chemicals regulation in Germany

In the regulation of chemical substances, it is generally agreed that there are no thresholds for genotoxic effects of chemicals, i.e. , that there are no doses without genotoxic effects. When classifying and labelling chemicals, dangerous properties of chemicals are to be identified. In this context, in general, the mode of action (threshold or not) is not considered for genotoxic substances. In the process of quantitative risk assessment, however, determination of the type of dose-effect relationships is decisive for the outcome and the type of risk management. The presence of a threshold must be justified specifically in each individual case. Inter alia, the following aspects may be discussed in this respect: aneugenic activity, indirect modes of action, extremely steep dose-effect relationships in combination with strong toxicity, specific toxicokinetic conditions which may lead to 'metabolic protection' prior to an attack of DNA. In the practice of the regulation of chemical substances with respect to their genotoxic effects, the discussion of thresholds has played a minor role. For notified new substances, there are, in general, no data available that would allow a reasonable discussion. Concerning substances out of the European programme on existing substances, so far 29 have been assessed in our institute with respect to genetic toxicity. Eight out of these have shown considerable evidence for genotoxicity. For two of them, a possible threshold is discussed: one substance is an aneugen, the other one is metabolised to an endogenic compound with genotoxic potential. In the practice of risk assessment of genotoxic substances, the discussion of the mode of action for genotoxicity is frequently associated with the evaluation of potential carcinogenic effects. Here, tissue-specific genotoxic effects in target organs for carcinogenicity are to be discussed. Moreover, the contribution of genotoxicity to the multifactorial process of tumour development should be assessed.