Functional characterization of iron-substituted neural zinc finger factor 1: metal and DNA binding

Neural zinc finger factor 1 (NZF-1) is a nonclassical zinc finger protein involved in neuronal development. NZF-1 contains multiple copies of a unique CCHHC zinc-binding domain that recognize a promoter element in the β-retinoic acid receptor gene termed β-retinoic acid receptor element (β-RARE). Previous studies have established that a two-domain fragment of NZF-1 bound with zinc is sufficient for specific DNA binding. Proper functioning of the nervous system relies heavily on iron and misregulation of this highly redox active metal has serious consequences. Several classes of zinc finger proteins have been shown to bind other metal ions, including iron. To determine if ferrous iron can coordinate to the metal-binding sites of NZF-1 and assess the functional consequences of such coordination, a fragment of NZF-1 that contains two zinc-binding domains, NZF-1 double finger (NZF-1-DF), was prepared. UV–vis spectroscopy experiments demonstrated that Fe(II) is capable of binding to NZF-1-DF. Upon reconstitution with either Fe(II) or Zn(II), NZF-1-DF binds selectively and tightly (nanomolar affinity) to its target β-RARE DNA sequence, whereas apo-NZF-1-DF does not bind to DNA and instead aggregates.     

Mechanism of DNA binding by the ADR1 zinc finger transcription factor as determined by SPR

The ADR1 protein recognizes a six base-pair consensus DNA sequence using two zinc fingers and an adjacent accessory motif. Kinetic measurements were performed on the DNA-binding domain of ADR1 using surface plasmon resonance. Binding by ADR1 was characterized to two known native binding sequences from the ADH2 and CTA1 promoter regions, which differ in two of the six consensus positions. In addition, non-specific binding by ADR1 to a random DNA sequence was measured. ADR1 binds the native sites with nanomolar affinities. Remarkably, ADR1 binds non-specific DNA with affinities only approximately tenfold lower than the native sequences. The specific and non-specific binding affinities are conferred mainly by differences in the association phase of DNA binding. The association rate for the complex is strongly influenced by the proximal accessory region, while the dissociation reaction and specificity of binding are controlled by the two zinc fingers. Binding kinetics of two ADR1 mutants was also examined. ADR1 containing an R91K mutation in the accessory region bound with similar affinity to wild-type, but with slightly less sequence specificity. The R91K mutation was observed to increase binding affinity to a suboptimal sequence by decreasing the complex dissociation rate. L146H, a change-of-specificity mutation at the +3 position of the second zinc finger, bound its preferred sequence with a slightly higher affinity than wild-type. The L146H mutant indicates that beneficial protein-DNA contacts provide similar levels of stabilization to the complex, whether they are hydrogen-bonding or van der Waals interactions.     

Multiconnection of identical zinc finger: implication for DNA binding affinity and unit modulation of the three zinc finger domain

Cys(2)-His(2)-type zinc finger proteins have a tandemly repeated array structure consisting of independent finger modules. They are expected to elevate the DNA binding affinity and specificity by increasing the number of finger modules. To investigate the relation between the number and the DNA binding affinity of the zinc finger, we have designed the two- to four-finger peptides by connecting the central zinc finger (finger 2) of Sp1 with the canonical linker sequence, Thr-Gly-Glu-Lys-Pro. Gel mobility shift assays reveal that the cognate three- and four-finger peptides, Sp1(zf222) and Sp1(zf2222), strongly bind to the predicted target sequences, but the two-finger peptide, Sp1(zf22), does not. Of special interest is the fact that the dissociation constant for Sp1(zf2222) binding to the target DNA is comparable to that for Sp1(zf222). The methylation interference, DNase I and hydroxyl radical footprintings, and circular permutation analyses demonstrate that Sp1(zf2222) binds to its target site with three successive zinc fingers and the binding of the fourth zinc finger is inhibited by DNA bending induced by the binding of the three-finger domain. The present results strongly indicate that the zinc finger protein binds to DNA by the three-finger domain as one binding unit. In addition, this information provides the basis for the design of a novel multifinger protein with high affinity and specificity for long DNA sequences, such as chromosomal DNAs.     

Zinc is required for folding and binding of a single zinc finger to DNA

A synthetic peptide corresponding to zinc finger 31 of the Xenopus protein Xfin adopts a folded conformation in the presence of zinc. The same peptide in the absence of zinc is not folded in a stable tertiary conformation, as determined by NMR. Binding experiments have shown that the peptide binds non-specifically to DNA only in the presence of zinc. Moreover, competitive DNA binding experiments indicate interaction with 3.9 +/- 0.4 base pairs.     

Chemical shift as a probe of molecular interfaces: NMR studies of DNA binding by the three amino-terminal zinc finger domains from transcription factor IIIA

We report the NMR resonance assignments for a macromolecular protein/DNA complex containing the three amino-terminal zinc fingers (92 amino acid residues) of Xenopus laevis TFIIIA (termed zf1-3) bound to the physiological DNA target (15 base pairs), and for the free DNA. Comparisons are made of the chemical shifts of protein backbone¹ H^N, ¹⁵N,¹³ C and¹³ C and DNA base and sugar protons of the free and bound species. Chemical shift changes are analyzed in the context of the structures of the zf1-3/DNA complex to assess the utility of chemical shift change as a probe of molecular interfaces. Chemical shift perturbations that occur upon binding in the zf1-3/DNA complex do not correspond directly to the structural interface, but rather arise from a number of direct and indirect structural and dynamic effects.