Identification of presenilin 1-selective γ-secretase inhibitors with reconstituted γ-secretase complexes

Accumulation of the β-amyloid (Aβ) peptides is one of the major pathologic hallmarks in the brains of Alzheimer's disease (AD) patients. Aβ is generated by sequential proteolytic cleavage of the amyloid precursor protein (APP) catalyzed by β- and γ-secretases. Inhibition of Aβ production by γ-secretase inhibitors (GSIs) is thus being pursued as a target for treatment of AD. In addition to processing APP, γ-secretase also catalyzes proteolytic cleavage of other transmembrane substrates, with the best characterized one being the cell surface receptor Notch. GSIs reduce Aβ production in animals and humans but also cause significant side effects because of the inhibition of Notch processing. The development of GSIs that reduce Aβ production and have less Notch-mediated side effect liability is therefore an important goal. γ-Secretase is a large membrane protein complex with four components, two of which have multiple isoforms: presenilin (PS1 or PS2), aph-1 (aph-1a or aph-1b), nicastrin, and pen-2. Here we describe the reconstitution of four γ-secretase complexes in Sf9 cells containing PS1--aph-1a, PS1--aph-1b, PS2--aph-1a, and PS2--aph-1b complexes. While PS1--aph-1a, PS1--aph-1b, and PS2--aph-1a complexes displayed robust γ-secretase activity, the reconstituted PS2--aph-1b complex was devoid of detectable γ-secretase activity. γ-Secretase complexes containing PS1 produced a higher proportion of the toxic species Aβ42 than γ-secretase complexes containing PS2. Using the reconstitution system, we identified MRK-560 and SCH 1500022 as highly selective inhibitors of PS1 γ-secretase activity. These findings may provide important insights into developing a new generation of γ-secretase inhibitors with improved side effect profiles.     

Novel γ-secretase enzyme modulators directly target presenilin protein

γ-Secretase is essential for the generation of the neurotoxic 42-amino acid amyloid β-peptide (Aβ(42)). The aggregation-prone hydrophobic peptide, which is deposited in Alzheimer disease (AD) patient brain, is generated from a C-terminal fragment of the β-amyloid precursor protein by an intramembrane cleavage of γ-secretase. Because Aβ(42) is widely believed to trigger AD pathogenesis, γ-secretase is a key AD drug target. Unlike inhibitors of the enzyme, γ-secretase modulators (GSMs) selectively lower Aβ(42) without interfering with the physiological function of γ-secretase. The molecular target(s) of GSMs and hence the mechanism of GSM action are not established. Here we demonstrate by using a biotinylated photocross-linkable derivative of highly potent novel second generation GSMs that γ-secretase is a direct target of GSMs. The GSM photoprobe specifically bound to the N-terminal fragment of presenilin, the catalytic subunit of γ-secretase, but not to other γ-secretase subunits. Binding was differentially competed by GSMs of diverse structural classes, indicating the existence of overlapping/multiple GSM binding sites or allosteric alteration of the photoprobe binding site. The β-amyloid precursor protein C-terminal fragment previously implicated as the GSM binding site was not targeted by the compound. The identification of presenilin as the molecular target of GSMs directly establishes allosteric modulation of enzyme activity as a mechanism of GSM action and may contribute to the development of therapeutically active GSMs for the treatment of AD.     

Phenylpiperidine-type γ-secretase modulators target the transmembrane domain 1 of presenilin 1

Amyloid-β peptide ending at the 42nd residue (Aβ42) is implicated in the pathogenesis of Alzheimer's disease (AD). Small compounds that exhibit selective lowering effects on Aβ42 production are termed γ-secretase modulators (GSMs) and are deemed as promising therapeutic agents against AD, although the molecular target as well as the mechanism of action remains controversial. Here, we show that a phenylpiperidine-type compound GSM-1 directly targets the transmembrane domain (TMD) 1 of presenilin 1 (PS1) by photoaffinity labelling experiments combined with limited digestion. Binding of GSM-1 affected the structure of the initial substrate binding and the catalytic sites of the γ-secretase, thereby decreasing production of Aβ42, possibly by enhancing its conversion to Aβ38. These data indicate an allosteric action of GSM-1 by directly binding to the TMD1 of PS1, pinpointing the target structure of the phenylpiperidine-type GSMs.     

Assembly of the presenilin γ-/ε-secretase complex

The presenilin complex is composed of four core proteins (presenilin 1 or presenilin 2, APH1, nicastrin, and PEN2). Several endogenous proteins have been reported to selectively modulate the function of the presenilin complexes; these include transmembrane trafficking protein, 21-KD (TMP21), CD147 antigen (basigin), the γ-secretase-activating protein (gSAP), and the orphan G-protein-coupled receptor 3. Because the structure and assembly of these complexes underlies their activity, this review will discuss current work on the assembly of the complex and on presenilin-interacting proteins that regulate secretase activity.     

Toward the structure of presenilin/γ-secretase and presenilin homologs

Presenilin is the catalytic component of the γ-secretase complex, a membrane-embedded aspartyl protease that plays a central role in biology and in the pathogenesis of Alzheimer’s disease. Upon assembly with its three protein cofactors (nicastrin, Aph-1 and Pen-2), presenilin undergoes autoproteolysis into two subunits, each of which contributes one of the catalytic aspartates to the active site. A family of presenilin homologs, including signal peptide peptidase, possess proteolytic activity without the need for other protein factors, and these simpler intramembane aspartyl proteases have given insight into the action of presenilin within the γ-secretase complex. Cellular and molecular studies support a nine-transmembrane topology for presenilins and their homologs, and small-molecule inhibitors and cysteine scanning with crosslinking have suggested certain presenilin residues and regions that contribute to substrate recognition and handling. Identification of partial complexes has also offered clues to protein–protein interactions within the γ-secretase complex. Biophysical methods have allowed 3D views of the γ-secretase complex and presenilins. Most recently, the crystal structure of a microbial presenilin homolog has confirmed a nine-transmembrane topology and intramembranous location and proximity of the two conserved and essential aspartates. The crystal structure also provides a platform for the formulation of specific hypotheses regarding substrate interaction and catalysis as well as the pathogenic mechanism of Alzheimer-causing presenilin mutations. This article is part of a Special Issue entitled: Intramembrane Proteases.     

Purification and characterization of the human γ-secretase activating protein

Alzheimer's disease is a fatal neurological disorder that is a leading cause of death, with its prevalence increasing as the average life expectancy increases worldwide. There is an urgent need to develop new therapeutics for this disease. A newly described protein, the γ-secretase activating protein (GSAP), has been proposed to promote elevated levels of amyloid-β production, an activity that seems to be inhibited using the well-establish cancer drug, imatinib (Gleevec). Despite much interest in this protein, there has been little biochemical characterization of GSAP. Here we report protocols for the recombinant bacterial expression and purification of this potentially important protein. GSAP is expressed in inclusion bodies, which can be solubilized using harsh detergents or urea; however, traditional methods of refolding were not successful in generating soluble forms of the protein that contained well-ordered and homogeneous tertiary structure. However, GSAP could be solubilized in detergent micelle solutions, where it was seen to be largely α-helical but to adopt only heterogeneous tertiary structure. Under these same conditions, GSAP did not associate with either imatinib or the 99-residue transmembrane C-terminal domain of the amyloid precursor protein. These results highlight the challenges that will be faced in attempts to manipulate and characterize this protein.     

Further characterization of a putative serine protease contributing to the γ-secretase cleavage of β-amyloid precursor protein

The 3-alkoxy-7-amino-4-chloro-isocoumarins JLK-6 and JLK-2 have been shown to markedly reduce the production of Amyloid β-peptide (Aβ) by Amyloid-β Precursor Protein (APP) expressing HEK293 cells by affecting the γ-secretase cleavage of APP, with no effect on the cleavage of the Notch receptor. This suggested that these compounds do not directly inhibit the presenilin-dependent γ-secretase complex but more likely interfere with an upstream target involved in γ-secretase-associated pathway. The mechanism of action of these compounds is unknown and there are high fundamental and therapeutical interests to unravel their target. Isocoumarin compounds were previously shown to behave as potent mechanism-based irreversible inhibitors of serine proteases, suggesting that the JLK-directed target could belong to such enzyme family. To get further insight into structure–activity relationships and to develop more potent isocoumarin derivatives, we have synthesized and evaluated a series of isocoumarin analogues with modifications at positions 3, 4 and 7. In particular, the 7-amino group was substituted with either acyl, urethane, alkyl or aryl groups, which could represent additional interaction sites. Altogether, the results highlighted the essential integrity of the 3-alkoxy-7-amino-4-chloro-isocoumarin scaffold for Aβ-lowering activity and supported the involvement of a serine protease, or may be more generally, a serine hydrolase. The newly reported 7-N-alkyl series produced the most active compounds with an IC₅₀ between 10 and 30 μM. Finally, we also explored peptide boronates, a series of reversible serine protease inhibitors, previously shown to also lower cellular Aβ production. The presented data suggested they could act on the same target or interfere with the same pathway as isocoumarins derivatives.     

Dissociation between the processivity and total activity of γ-secretase: implications for the mechanism of Alzheimer's disease-causing presenilin mutations

The amyloid β-peptide (Aβ), strongly implicated in the pathogenesis of Alzheimer's disease (AD), is produced from the amyloid β-protein precursor (APP) through consecutive proteolysis by β- and γ-secretases. The latter protease contains presenilin as the catalytic component of a membrane-embedded aspartyl protease complex. Missense mutations in presenilin are associated with early-onset familial AD, and these mutations generally both decrease Aβ production and increase the ratio of the aggregation-prone 42-residue form (Aβ42) to the 40-residue form (Aβ40). The connection between these two effects is not understood. Besides Aβ40 and Aβ42, γ-secretase produces a range of Aβ peptides, the result of initial cutting at the ε site to form Aβ48 or Aβ49 and subsequent trimming every three or four residues. Thus, γ-secretase displays both overall proteolytic activity (ε cutting) and processivity (trimming) toward its substrate APP. Here we tested whether a decrease in total activity correlates with decreased processivity using wild-type and AD-mutant presenilin-containing protease complexes. Changes in pH, temperature, and salt concentration that reduced the overall activity of the wild-type enzyme did not consistently result in increased proportions of longer Aβ peptides. Low salt concentrations and acidic pH were notable exceptions that subtly alter the proportion of individual Aβ peptides, suggesting that the charged state of certain residues may influence processivity. Five different AD mutant complexes, representing a broad range of effects on overall activity, Aβ42:Aβ40 ratios, and ages of disease onset, were also tested, revealing again that changes in total activity and processivity can be dissociated. Factors that control initial proteolysis of APP at the ε site apparently differ significantly from factors affecting subsequent trimming and the distribution of Aβ peptides.     

Substrate sequence influences γ-secretase modulator activity, role of the transmembrane domain of the amyloid precursor protein

A subset of non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs modulates the γ cleavage site in the amyloid precursor protein (APP) to selectively reduce production of Aβ42. It is unclear precisely how these γ-secretase modulators (GSMs) act to preferentially spare Aβ40 production as well as Notch processing and signaling. In an effort to determine the substrate requirements in NSAID/GSM activity, we determined the effects of sulindac sulfide and flurbiprofen on γ-cleavage of artificial constructs containing several γ-secretase substrates. Using FLAG-tagged constructs that expressed extracellularly truncated APP, Notch-1, or CD44, we found that these substrates have different sensitivities to sulindac sulfide. γ-Secretase cleavage of APP was altered by sulindac sulfide, but CD44 and Notch-1 were either insensitive or only minimally altered by this compound. Using chimeric APP constructs, we observed that the transmembrane domain (TMD) of APP played a pivotal role in determining drug sensitivity. Substituting the APP TMD with that of APLP2 retained the sensitivity to γ-cleavage modulation, but replacing TMDs from Notch-1 or ErbB4 rendered the resultant molecules insensitive to drug treatment. Specifically, the GXXXG motif within APP appeared to be critical to GSM activity. Consequently, the modulatory effects on γ-cleavage appears to be substrate-dependent. We hypothesize that the substrate present in the γ-secretase complex influences the conformation of the complex so that the binding site of GSMs is either stabilized or less favorable to influence the cleavage of the respective substrates.     

Contribution of the amino terminal tyrosine to the interaction of γ-endorphin with opiate receptors

The putative behavioral hexadecapeptide, des-Tyr¹-γ-endorphin, has been compared with γ-endorphin in an in vitro radioreceptor assay utilizing [³H]β-endorphin as the labeled ligand and rat brain membranes as a source of opiate receptors. Under the conditions used, β-endorphin and γ-endorphin exhibit K_d's of 0.4 nM and 58 nM, respectively. The K_d of des-Tyr¹-γ-endorphin was estimated to be 42 μM indicating that the amino terminal tyrosine in γ-endorphin contributes about −4 kcal/mole at 30°C to the free energy of binding associated with the peptide-opiate receptor interaction. Circular dichroic spectra were obtained, and the only structural element discernible was a possible β-turn. Thus, at physiological levels it seems unlikely that the des-Tyr¹ fragment of γ-endorphin will exhibit any significant interaction with the opiate receptor.     

Determination of the proteolytic cleavage sites of the amyloid precursor-like protein 2 by the proteases ADAM10, BACE1 and γ-secretase

Regulated intramembrane proteolysis of the amyloid precursor protein (APP) by the protease activities α-, β- and γ-secretase controls the generation of the neurotoxic amyloid β peptide. APLP2, the amyloid precursor-like protein 2, is a homolog of APP, which shows functional overlap with APP, but lacks an amyloid β domain. Compared to APP, less is known about the proteolytic processing of APLP2, in particular in neurons, and the cleavage sites have not yet been determined. APLP2 is cleaved by the β-secretase BACE1 and additionally by an α-secretase activity. The two metalloproteases ADAM10 and ADAM17 have been suggested as candidate APLP2 α-secretases in cell lines. Here, we used RNA interference and found that ADAM10, but not ADAM17, is required for the constitutive α-secretase cleavage of APLP2 in HEK293 and SH-SY5Y cells. Likewise, in primary murine neurons knock-down of ADAM10 suppressed APLP2 α-secretase cleavage. Using mass spectrometry we determined the proteolytic cleavage sites in the APLP2 sequence. ADAM10 was found to cleave APLP2 after arginine 670, whereas BACE1 cleaves after leucine 659. Both cleavage sites are located in close proximity to the membrane. γ-secretase cleavage was found to occur at different peptide bonds between alanine 694 and valine 700, which is close to the N-terminus of the predicted APLP2 transmembrane domain. Determination of the APLP2 cleavage sites enables functional studies of the different APLP2 ectodomain fragments and the production of cleavage-site specific antibodies for APLP2, which may be used for biomarker development.     

Mapping of the regulatory type Iα and catalytic β subunits of cAMP-dependent protein kinase and interleukin 1α and 1β in the pig

The genes coding for the regulatory type I subunit (PRKAR1A) and the catalytic subunit (PRKACB) of cAMP-dependent protein kinase and the genes for interleukin 1 (IL1A) and interleukin 1 (IL1B) were localized in the pig by means of radioactive in situ hybridization. PRKAR1A was mapped to 12p1.4 and PRKARB to 6q3.1 q3.3. The genes for IL1A and IL1B were both assigned to Chromosome (Chr) 3, in the region q1.2 q1.3 and q1.1 q1.4, respectively. The cDNA nucleotide sequences of these porcine genes were compared with those of human, mouse, and cattle. The location of the genes was discussed in relation to the position of their homologous loci in these mammalian species.     

Increased expression of PS1 is sufficient to elevate the level and activity of γ-secretase in vivo

Increase in the generation and deposition of amyloid-β (Aβ) plays a central role in the development of Alzheimer's Disease (AD). Elevation of the activity of γ-secretase, a key enzyme required for the generation for Aβ, can thus be a potential risk factor in AD. However, it is not known whether γ-secretase can be upregulated in vivo. While in vitro studies showed that expression of all four components of γ-secretase (Nicastrin, Presenilin, Pen-2 and Aph-1) are required for upregulation of γ-secretase, it remains to be established as to whether this is true in vivo. To investigate whether overexpressing a single component of the γ-secretase complex is sufficient to elevate its level and activity in the brain, we analyzed transgenic mice expressing either wild type or familial AD (fAD) associated mutant PS1. In contrast to cell culture studies, overexpression of either wild type or mutant PS1 is sufficient to increase levels of Nicastrin and Pen-2, and elevate the level of active γ-secretase complex, enzymatic activity of γ-secretase and the deposition of Aβ in brains of mice. Importantly, γ-secretase comprised of mutant PS1 is less active than that of wild type PS1-containing γ-secretase; however, γ-secretase comprised of mutant PS1 cleaves at the Aβ42 site of APP-CTFs more efficiently than at the Aβ40 site, resulting in greater accumulation of Aβ deposits in the brain. Our data suggest that whereas fAD-linked PS1 mutants cause early onset disease, upregulation of PS1/γ-secretase activity may be a risk factor for late onset sporadic AD.     

Contribution of each Trp residue toward the intrinsic fluorescence of the Giα1 protein

G_iα1 is the inhibitory G-protein that, upon activation, reduces the activity of adenylyl cyclase. Comparison of the crystal structures of G_iα1 bound to GDP•AMF or GTPγS with that of the inactive, GPD-bound protein indicates that a conformational change occurs in the activation step centered on three switch regions. The contribution of each tryptophan residue (W211 in the switch II region, W131 in the α-helical domain, and W258 in the GTPase domain) toward the intrinsic protein fluorescence was evaluated by using W211F, W131F, and W258F mutants. All three tryptophan residues contributed significantly toward the emission spectra regardless of the conformation. When activated by either GDP•AMF or GTPγS, the observed maximal-fluorescence scaled according to the solvent accessibilities of the tryptophan residues, calculated from molecular dynamics simulations. In the GDP•AMF and GTPγS, but not in the GDP, conformations, the residues W211 and R208 are in close proximity and form a π-cation interaction that results in a red shift in the emission spectra of WT, and W131F and W258F mutants, but a blue shift for the W211F mutant. The observed shifts did not show a relationship with the span of the W211-R208 bridge, but rather with changes in the total interaction energies. Trypsin digestion of the active conformations only occurred for the W211F mutant indicating that the electrostatic π-cation interaction blocks access to R208, which was consistent with the molecular dynamics simulations. We conclude that solvent accessibility and interaction energies account for the fluorescence features of G_iα1.     

Contribution of Anionic vs. Neutral Polymers to the Formation of Green Rust 1 from γ-FeOOH Bioreduction

To assess the effect of polymeric substances on the biomineralization and stabilization of green rust (GR), the effect of two organic polymers on the transformation of lepidocrocite (γ-FeOOH) to GR vs. magnetite in presence of Shewanella putrefaciens was investigated. These two polymers, generally used as flocculants, are polyacrylic acid (PAA), which bears negatively charged carboxylic groups at neutral pH and is expected to react with cationic hydrolyzed iron species, and polyacrylamide (PAM), which is a neutral polymer that may develop hydrogen bonds with iron nanocolloids. The bioreduction of lepidocrocite by S. putrefaciens was performed under conditions known to yield either magnetite or GR. Each operational condition of interest was investigated with various polymer concentrations from 0.6 to 60 mg g^?1 Fe (10 to 1000 mg l^?1). The final product was characterized using X-ray diffraction and electronic microscopy. The results showed that the formation of GR is favored, with respect to magnetite, to a lesser extent with PAM than with PAA. These results indicated that polymers influence the chemical stability of GR and/or guide the route of biomineralization. Polymer properties, in addition to silica and phosphate concentrations, are then critical parameters that control the secondary iron mineral biomineralization from iron-reducing bacteria.

Supplemental materials are available for this article. Go to the publisher's online edition of Geomicrobiology Journal to view the supplemental file.     

Modification of a promiscuous inhibitor shifts the inhibition from γ-secretase to FLT-3

The inhibition of FLT-3 activity is an interesting target for the treatment of acute myeloid leukemia (AML). The serendipitous identification of FLT-3 inhibitors from a CK1/γ-secretase programme provided compounds with dual inhibitory activity. We analyzed the structure–activity relationship of these inhibitors and derivatized them to arrive at compounds with reduced impact on γ-secretase activity and enhanced FLT-3 inhibition.     

Structure and function of γ-secretase

The γ-secretase complex is a prime target for pharmacological intervention in Alzheimer’s disease and so far drug discovery efforts have yielded a large variety of potent and rather specific inhibitors of this enzymatic activity. However, as γ-secretase is able to cleave a wide variety of physiological important substrates, the real challenge is to develop substrate-specific compounds. Therefore, obtaining structural information about γ-secretase is indispensable. As crystal structures of the complex will be difficult to achieve, applied biochemical approaches need to be integrated with structural information obtained from other intramembrane-cleaving proteases. Here we review current knowledge about the structure and function of γ-secretase and discuss the value of these findings for the mechanistic understanding of this unusual protease.