Sip1, a Novel RS Domain-Containing Protein Essential for Pre-mRNA Splicing

Previous studies have shown that protein-protein interactions among splicing factors may play an important role in pre-mRNA splicing. We report here identification and functional characterization of a new splicing factor, Sip1 (SC35-interacting protein 1). Sip1 was initially identified by virtue of its interaction with SC35, a splicing factor of the SR family. Sip1 interacts with not only several SR proteins but also with U1-70K and U2AF65, proteins associated with 5′ and 3′ splice sites, respectively. The predicted Sip1 sequence contains an arginine-serine-rich (RS) domain but does not have any known RNA-binding motifs, indicating that it is not a member of the SR family. Sip1 also contains a region with weak sequence similarity to the Drosophila splicing regulator suppressor of white apricot (SWAP). An essential role for Sip1 in pre-mRNA splicing was suggested by the observation that anti-Sip1 antibodies depleted splicing activity from HeLa nuclear extract. Purified recombinant Sip1 protein, but not other RS domain-containing proteins such as SC35, ASF/SF2, and U2AF65, restored the splicing activity of the Sip1-immunodepleted extract. Addition of U2AF65 protein further enhanced the splicing reconstitution by the Sip1 protein. Deficiency in the formation of both A and B splicing complexes in the Sip1-depleted nuclear extract indicates an important role of Sip1 in spliceosome assembly. Together, these results demonstrate that Sip1 is a novel RS domain-containing protein required for pre-mRNA splicing and that the functional role of Sip1 in splicing is distinct from those of known RS domain-containing splicing factors.Pre-mRNA splicing takes place in spliceosomes, the large RNA-protein complexes containing pre-mRNA, U1, U2, U4/6, and U5 small nuclear ribonucleoprotein particles (snRNPs), and a large number of accessory protein factors (for reviews, see references 21, 22, 37, 44, and 48). It is increasingly clear that the protein factors are important for pre-mRNA splicing and that studies of these factors are essential for further understanding of molecular mechanisms of pre-mRNA splicing.Most mammalian splicing factors have been identified by biochemical fractionation and purification (3, 15, 19, 31–36, 45, 69–71, 73), by using antibodies recognizing splicing factors (8, 9, 16, 17, 61, 66, 67, 74), and by sequence homology (25, 52, 74).Splicing factors containing arginine-serine-rich (RS) domains have emerged as important players in pre-mRNA splicing. These include members of the SR family, both subunits of U2 auxiliary factor (U2AF), and the U1 snRNP protein U1-70K (for reviews, see references 18, 41, and 59). Drosophila alternative splicing regulators transformer (Tra), transformer 2 (Tra2), and suppressor of white apricot (SWAP) also contain RS domains (20, 40, 42). RS domains in these proteins play important roles in pre-mRNA splicing (7, 71, 75), in nuclear localization of these splicing proteins (23, 40), and in protein-RNA interactions (56, 60, 64). Previous studies by us and others have demonstrated that one mechanism whereby SR proteins function in splicing is to mediate specific protein-protein interactions among spliceosomal components and between general splicing factors and alternative splicing regulators (1, 1a, 6, 10, 27, 63, 74, 77). Such protein-protein interactions may play critical roles in splice site recognition and association (for reviews, see references 4, 18, 37, 41, 47 and 59). Specific interactions among the splicing factors also suggest that it is possible to identify new splicing factors by their interactions with known splicing factors.Here we report identification of a new splicing factor, Sip1, by its interaction with the essential splicing factor SC35. The predicted Sip1 protein sequence contains an RS domain and a region with sequence similarity to the Drosophila splicing regulator, SWAP. We have expressed and purified recombinant Sip1 protein and raised polyclonal antibodies against the recombinant Sip1 protein. The anti-Sip1 antibodies specifically recognize a protein migrating at a molecular mass of approximately 210 kDa in HeLa nuclear extract. The anti-Sip1 antibodies sufficiently deplete Sip1 protein from the nuclear extract, and the Sip1-depleted extract is inactive in pre-mRNA splicing. Addition of recombinant Sip1 protein can partially restore splicing activity to the Sip1-depleted nuclear extract, indicating an essential role of Sip1 in pre-mRNA splicing. Other RS domain-containing proteins, including SC35, ASF/SF2, and U2AF65, cannot substitute for Sip1 in reconstituting splicing activity of the Sip1-depleted nuclear extract. However, addition of U2AF65 further increases splicing activity of Sip1-reconstituted nuclear extract, suggesting that there may be a functional interaction between Sip1 and U2AF65 in nuclear extract.     

Analysis of Free Energy Signals Arising from Nucleotide Hybridization Between rRNA and mRNA Sequences during Translation in Eubacteria

A decoding algorithm is tested that mechanistically models the progressive alignments that arise as the mRNA moves past the rRNA tail during translation elongation. Each of these alignments provides an opportunity for hybridization between the single-stranded, -terminal nucleotides of the 16S rRNA and the spatially accessible window of mRNA sequence, from which a free energy value can be calculated. Using this algorithm we show that a periodic, energetic pattern of frequency 1/3 is revealed. This periodic signal exists in the majority of coding regions of eubacterial genes, but not in the non-coding regions encoding the 16S and 23S rRNAs. Signal analysis reveals that the population of coding regions of each bacterial species has a mean phase that is correlated in a statistically significant way with species () content. These results suggest that the periodic signal could function as a synchronization signal for the maintenance of reading frame and that codon usage provides a mechanism for manipulation of signal phase.[1,2,3,4,5,6,7,8,9,10,11,12,13,14,15,16,17,18,19,20,21,22,23,24,25,26,27,28,29,30,31,32]     

Exonuclease Function of Human Mre11 Promotes Deletional Nonhomologous End Joining

DNA double-stranded breaks (DSBs) are lethal if not repaired and are highly mutagenic if misrepaired. Nonhomologous end joining (NHEJ) is one of the major DSB repair pathways and can rejoin the DSB ends either precisely or with mistakes. Recent evidence suggests the existence of two NHEJ subpathways: conservative NHEJ (C-NHEJ), which does not require microhomology and can join ends precisely; and deletional NHEJ (D-NHEJ), which utilizes microhomology to join the ends with small deletions. Little is known about how these NHEJ subpathways are regulated. Mre11 has been implicated in DNA damage response, thus we investigated whether Mre11 function also extended to NHEJ. We utilized an intrachromosomal NHEJ substrate in which DSBs are generated by the I-SceI to address this question. The cohesive ends are fully complementary and were either repaired by C-NHEJ or D-NHEJ with similar efficiency. We found that disruption of Mre11 by RNA interference in human cells led to a 10-fold decrease in the frequency of D-NHEJ compared with cells with functional Mre11. Interestingly, C-NHEJ was not affected by Mre11 status. Expression of wild type but not exonuclease-defective Mre11 mutants was able to rescue D-NHEJ in Mre11-deficient cells. Further mutational analysis suggested that additional mechanisms associated with methylation of Mre11 at the C-terminal glycine–arginine-rich domain contributed to the promotion of D-NHEJ by Mre11. This study provides new insights into the mechanisms by which Mre11 affects the accuracy of DSB end joining specifically through control of the D-NHEJ subpathway, thus illustrating the complexity of the Mre11 role in maintaining genomic stability.DNA double-stranded breaks (DSBs)³ can be produced in physiological and genotoxic processes. Improper repair or failure to repair DSBs can lead to gene deletions, duplications, translocations, and missegregation of large chromosome fragments, which may result in gene dosage imbalance, cancer development, or cell death (1–3). Historically, two distinct pathways have been described which ensure that DSBs are repaired: nonhomologous end joining (NHEJ) and homologous recombination (HR). During HR, the damaged chromosome interacts via synapsis with an undamaged DNA molecule with which it shares extensive sequence homology, usually its sister chromatid (4, 5). HR is most active in the late S and G₂ phases of the cell cycle. In contrast, NHEJ is active throughout the cell cycle and requires little or no DNA homology during repair; thus, it is traditionally considered an error-prone repair pathway (6, 7). However, accumulating evidence from recent studies suggests that there exists an error-free NHEJ subpathway (8, 9).Two types of end-joining reactions can be defined operationally. The first one, which may be called conservative NHEJ (C-NHEJ), is characterized by the precise joining of short, overhanging, complementary ends. Proteins including Ku70/Ku80 and XRCC4 (10–12) are associated with this highly efficient pathway, whereby most ends are rejoined successfully without any alteration of the DNA sequence (8). The alternative pathway for NHEJ is the highly mutagenic and deletional NHEJ (D-NHEJ), which results in short deletions after use of imperfect microhomology of about 1–10 bp at the repair junctions. D-NHEJ activity has been demonstrated in the budding yeast Saccharomyces cerevisiae. In addition, D-NHEJ is independent of Rad52, Rad1, or Ku80 but depends on Mre11 in yeast (13, 14). However, the genetic determinants of this subpathway have not been well established in mammalian cells.Mre11 is the core subunit of the Mre11·Rad50·Nbs1 complex (called the MRN complex), which is conserved throughout all kingdoms of life. The MRN complex is a central player in most aspects of the cellular response to DSBs, including HR, NHEJ, telomere maintenance, and DNA damage checkpoints (15–17). Loss of Mre11 results in increased radiosensitivity and chromosomal instability (17). Patients with germ line mutations of Mre11 have clinical presentations similar to those of ataxia telangiectasia patients (ataxia telangiectasia-like disorder) (18).After DNA damage, the MRN complex is recruited to the sites of damage via zinc hooks at the ends of the long, flexible arms of Rad50 (19, 20). Mre11 contains both single-stranded DNA endonuclease and 3′-5′ exonuclease activities in vitro, but in vivo Mre11 is also implicated in 5′-3′ DSB resection. The MRN complex also interacts with BRCA1 and CtIP, which may be essential for DSB end resection to generate 3′ overhanging single-stranded DNA during initiation of HR (21, 22).Mre11 has an N-terminal nuclease domain, which contains five phosphoesterase motifs, and a C-terminal glycine–arginine-rich domain (GAR). Arthur et al. (23) showed that an H85L mutation completely abrogated exonuclease activity, whereas binding to Rad50 and Nbs1 was retained. Complementation of ataxia telangiectasia-like disorder cells with this mutant, called Mre11-3, restored the localization of the MRN complex to DSBs in IR-induced foci (23, 24). Methylation of the GAR region has also been shown to be important for the DNA binding and exonuclease activity of Mre11 in vitro (25, 26). Both the crystal structure of yeast Mre11 and data from conditional knock-out mice (Mre11^H129N/Δ) reveal that the nuclease activity of Mre11 is required for HR repair of DSBs (22, 27). However, the role of Mre11 in NHEJ is not well defined (27, 28). Most recently, Mre11 was reported to support NHEJ in mammalian cell (29–31). However, whether Mre11 regulates both NHEJ subpathways or only D-NHEJ is controversial, and the mechanisms by which Mre11 is involved in NHEJ remain to be established.To address these questions, we have established a system that can analyze the accuracy and efficiency of rejoining of two adjacent DSB ends at chromosomal level in human embryonic kidney 293 (HEK293) cells. We show here that Mre11 siRNA knockdown in these cells results in significant reduction of the overall NHEJ efficiency. Upon sequencing the repair junctions, we found that Mre11 siRNA knockdown suppressed D-NHEJ by ∼10-fold, reflected by a reduction of small deletions in the repair junction, but it had no effect on the efficiency of C-NHEJ. Mutation of Mre11 in either the phosphoesterase domain (Mre11-3) or the GAR region (Mre11-R/A) to produce abnormal exonuclease activity impaired the D-NHEJ pathway only. The D-NHEJ deficiency is significantly more severe in cells with Mre11-R/A than that in cells with Mre11-3. Therefore, our data suggest that Mre11 is required specifically for D-NHEJ repair of DNA DSBs and that its exonuclease activity is at least one of the important mechanisms for this DNA end joining subpathway.     

Reconstitution of Uracil DNA Glycosylase-initiated Base Excision Repair in Herpes Simplex Virus-1

Herpes simplex virus-1 is a large double-stranded DNA virus that is self-sufficient in a number of genome transactions. Hence, the virus encodes its own DNA replication apparatus and is capable of mediating recombination reactions. We recently reported that the catalytic subunit of the HSV-1 DNA polymerase (UL30) exhibits apurinic/apyrimidinic and 5′-deoxyribose phosphate lyase activities that are integral to base excision repair. Base excision repair is required to maintain genome stability as a means to counter the accumulation of unusual bases and to protect from the loss of DNA bases. Here we have reconstituted a system with purified HSV-1 and human proteins that perform all the steps of uracil DNA glycosylase-initiated base excision repair. In this system nucleotide incorporation is dependent on the HSV-1 uracil DNA glycosylase (UL2), human AP endonuclease, and the HSV-1 DNA polymerase. Completion of base excision repair can be mediated by T4 DNA ligase as well as human DNA ligase I or ligase IIIα-XRCC1 complex. Of these, ligase IIIα-XRCC1 is the most efficient. Moreover, ligase IIIα-XRCC1 confers specificity onto the reaction in as much as it allows ligation to occur in the presence of the HSV-1 DNA polymerase processivity factor (UL42) and prevents base excision repair from occurring with heterologous DNA polymerases. Completion of base excision repair in this system is also dependent on the incorporation of the correct nucleotide. These findings demonstrate that the HSV-1 proteins in combination with cellular factors that are not encoded by the virus are capable of performing base excision repair. These results have implications on the role of base excision repair in viral genome maintenance during lytic replication and reactivation from latency.Herpes simplex virus-1 (HSV-1)² is a large double-stranded DNA virus with a genome of ∼152 kilobase pairs (for reviews, see Refs. 1 and 2). HSV-1 switches between lytic replication in epithelial cells and a state of latency in sensory neurons during which there is no detectable DNA replication (1). Viral DNA replication is mediated by seven essential virus-encoded factors (3–5). Of these, two encode subunits of the viral replicase (for review, see Refs. 6 and 7). The catalytic subunit (UL30) exhibits DNA polymerase (Pol), 3′-5′ proofreading exonuclease, and RNase H activities (8–11). UL30 exists as a heterodimer with the UL42 protein that confers a high degree of processivity on the Pol (11–17).Viral DNA replication is accompanied by vigorous recombination that leads to the formation of large networks of viral DNA replication intermediates (18). The HSV-1 single-strand DNA-binding protein (ICP8) has been shown to play a major role in mediating these recombination reactions (19–21). One role for the high frequency of recombination is to restart DNA replication at sites of fork collapse. Further mechanisms that contribute to genome maintenance are processes that survey and repair damage to the DNA to ensure the availability of a robust replication template. In this regard base excision repair (BER) is essential to remove unusual bases from the DNA and to repair apurinic/apyrimidinic (AP) sites resulting from spontaneous base loss (for review, see Ref. 22). With respect to HSV-1, a recent study showed that viral DNA from infected cultured fibroblasts contains a steady state of 2.8–5.9 AP sites per viral genome equivalent (23). Because AP sites are non-instructional, the failure to repair such sites would terminate viral replication. Indeed, UL30 cannot replicate beyond a model AP site (tetrahydrofuran residue) (23), indicating that the virus must enable a process to repair such lesions. In this regard HSV-1 possesses several enzymes that would safeguard from the accumulation of unusual bases, specifically uracil, and base loss. Hence, HSV-1 encodes a uracil DNA glycosylase (UDG) (UL2) as well as a dUTPase to reduce the pool of dUTP and prevent misincorporation by the viral Pol (24, 25). Moreover, we recently showed that the catalytic subunit of the viral Pol (UL30) exhibits AP and 5′-deoxyribose phosphate (dRP) lyase activities (26). The presence of a virus-encoded UDG and DNA lyase indicates that HSV-1 has the capacity to perform integral steps of BER, specifically for the removal of uracil. Indeed, the excision of uracil may be important for viral replication. Hence, it has been shown that uracil substitutions in the viral origins of replication alters their recognition by the viral initiator protein (27). Moreover, whereas UL2 may be dispensable for viral replication in fibroblast (24), UL2 mutants exhibit reduced neurovirulence and a decreased frequency of reactivation from latency (28). Thus, UDG action in HSV-1 may be important for viral reactivation after quiescence in neuronal cells during which the genome may accumulate uracil as a result of spontaneous deamination of cytosine. In another herpesvirus, cytomegalovirus, the viral UDG was shown to be required for the transition to late-phase DNA replication (29, 30). Consequently, it is possible that BER plays a significant role in various aspects of the herpesvirus life cycle.In mammalian single-nucleotide BER initiated by monofunctional DNA glycosylases, the resulting AP sites are incised hydrolytically at the 5′ side by AP endonuclease (APE), generating a 3′-OH. This is followed by template-directed incorporation of one nucleotide by Pol β to generate a 5′-dRP flap (22, 31, 32). The 5′-dRP residue is subsequently removed by the 5′-dRP lyase activity of Pol β to leave a nick with a 3′-OH and 5′-phosphate that is ligated by DNA ligase I or the physiologically more relevant ligase IIIα-XRCC1 complex (for review, see Refs. 33 and 34). Here we show that the HSV-1 UDG (UL2) and Pol (UL30) cooperate with human APE and human ligase IIIα-XRCC1 complex to perform BER in vitro. This finding has implications on the role of BER in viral genome maintenance during lytic replication and in the emergence of the virus from neuronal latency.     

Algorithms for Finding Small Attractors in Boolean Networks

A Boolean network is a model used to study the interactions between different genes in genetic regulatory networks. In this paper, we present several algorithms using gene ordering and feedback vertex sets to identify singleton attractors and small attractors in Boolean networks. We analyze the average case time complexities of some of the proposed algorithms. For instance, it is shown that the outdegree-based ordering algorithm for finding singleton attractors works in time for , which is much faster than the naive time algorithm, where is the number of genes and is the maximum indegree. We performed extensive computational experiments on these algorithms, which resulted in good agreement with theoretical results. In contrast, we give a simple and complete proof for showing that finding an attractor with the shortest period is NP-hard.[1,2,3,4,5,6,7,8,9,10,11,12,13,14,15,16,17,18,19,20,21,22,23,24,25,26,27,28,29,30,31,32]