α-Cleavage of cellular prion protein

The cellular prion protein (PrP^C) is subjected to various processing under physiological and pathological conditions, of which the α-cleavage within the central hydrophobic domain not only disrupts a region critical for both PrP toxicity and PrP^C to PrP^Sc conversion but also produces the N1 fragment that is neuroprotective and the C1 fragment that enhances the pro-apoptotic effect of staurosporine in one report and inhibits prion in another. The proteases responsible for the α-cleavage of PrP^C are controversial. The effect of ADAM10, ADAM17, and ADAM9 on N1 secretion clearly indicates their involvement in the α-cleavage of PrP^C, but there has been no report of direct PrP^C α-cleavage activity with any of the three ADAMs in a purified protein form. We demonstrated that, in muscle cells, ADAM8 is the primary protease for the α-cleavage of PrP^C, but another unidentified protease(s) must also play a minor role. We also found that PrP^C regulates ADAM8 expression, suggesting that a close examination on the relationships between PrP^C and its processing enzymes may reveal novel roles and underlying mechanisms for PrP^C in non-prion diseases such as asthma and cancer.     

��-Cleavage of cellular prion protein

The cellular prion protein (PrP^C) is subjected to various processing under physiological and pathological conditions, of which the α-cleavage within the central hydrophobic domain not only disrupts a region critical for both PrP toxicity and PrP^C to PrP^Sc conversion but also produces the N1 fragment that is neuroprotective and the C1 fragment that enhances the pro-apoptotic effect of staurosporine in one report and inhibits prion in another. The proteases responsible for the α-cleavage of PrP^C are controversial. The effect of ADAM10, ADAM17, and ADAM9 on N1 secretion clearly indicates their involvement in the α-cleavage of PrP^C, but there has been no report of direct PrP^C α-cleavage activity with any of the three ADAMs in a purified protein form. We demonstrated that, in muscle cells, ADAM8 is the primary protease for the α-cleavage of PrP^C, but another unidentified protease(s) must also play a minor role. We also found that PrP^C regulates ADAM8 expression, suggesting that a close examination on the relationships between PrP^C and its processing enzymes may reveal novel roles and underlying mechanisms for PrP^C in non-prion diseases such as asthma and cancer.     

Separate mechanisms act concurrently to shed and release the prion protein from the cell

The cellular prion protein (PrP^C) is attached to the cell membrane via its glycosylphosphatidylinositol (GPI)-anchor and is constitutively shed into the extracellular space. Here, three different mechanisms are presented that concurrently shed PrP^C from the cell. The fast α-cleavage released a N-terminal fragment (N1) into the medium and the extreme C-terminal cleavage shed soluble full-length (FL-S) PrP and C-terminally cleaved (C1-S) fragments outside the cell. Also, a slow exosomal release of full-length (FL) and C1-fragment (C1) was demonstrated. The three separate mechanisms acting simultaneously, but with different kinetics, have to be taken into consideration when elucidating functional roles of PrP^C and also when processing of PrP^C is considered as a target for intervention in prion diseases. Further, in this study it was shown that metalloprotease inhibitors affected the extreme C-terminal cleavage and shedding of PrP^C. The metalloprotease inhibitors did not influence the α-cleavage or the exosomal release. Taken together, these results are important for understanding the different mechanisms acting in parallel in the shedding and cleavage of PrP^C.     

A New Paradigm for Enzymatic Control of α-Cleavage and β-Cleavage of the Prion Protein

The cellular form of the prion protein (PrP^C) is found in both full-length and several different cleaved forms in vivo. Although the precise functions of the PrP^C proteolytic products are not known, cleavage between the unstructured N-terminal domain and the structured C-terminal domain at Lys-109↓His-110 (mouse sequence), termed α-cleavage, has been shown to produce the anti-apoptotic N1 and the scrapie-resistant C1 peptide fragments. β-Cleavage, residing adjacent to the octarepeat domain and N-terminal to the α-cleavage site, is thought to arise from the action of reactive oxygen species produced from redox cycling of coordinated copper. We sought to elucidate the role of key members of the ADAM (a disintegrin and metalloproteinase) enzyme family, as well as Cu²⁺ redox cycling, in recombinant mouse PrP (MoPrP) cleavage through LC/MS analysis. Our findings show that although Cu²⁺ redox-generated reactive oxygen species do produce fragmentation corresponding to β-cleavage, ADAM8 also cleaves MoPrP in the octarepeat domain in a Cu²⁺- and Zn²⁺-dependent manner. Additional cleavage by ADAM8 was observed at the previously proposed location of α-cleavage, Lys-109↓His-110 (MoPrP sequencing); however, upon addition of Cu²⁺, the location of α-cleavage shifted by several amino acids toward the C terminus. ADAM10 and ADAM17 have also been implicated in α-cleavage at Lys-109↓His-110; however, we observed that they instead cleaved MoPrP at a novel location, Ala-119↓Val-120, with additional cleavage by ADAM10 at Gly-227↓Arg-228 near the C terminus. Together, our results show that MoPrP cleavage is far more complex than previously thought and suggest a mechanism by which PrP^C fragmentation responds to Cu²⁺ and Zn²⁺.     

Microdeletions within the hydrophobic core region of cellular prion protein alter its topology and metabolism

The cellular prion protein (PrP^C) is a GPI-anchored cell-surface protein. A small subset of PrP^C molecules, however, can be integrated into the ER-membrane via a transmembrane domain (TM), which also harbors the most highly conserved regions of PrP^C, termed the hydrophobic core (HC). A mutation in HC is associated with prion disease resulting in an enhanced formation of a transmembrane form (^CtmPrP), which has thus been postulated to be a neurotoxic molecule besides PrP^Sc. To elucidate a possible physiological function of the transmembrane domain, we created a set of mutants carrying microdeletions of 2-8 aminoacids within HC between position 114 and 121. Here, we show that these mutations display reduced propensity for transmembrane topology. In addition, the mutants exhibited alterations in the formation of the C1 proteolytic fragment, which is generated by α-cleavage during normal PrP^C metabolism, indicating that HC might function as recognition site for the protease(s) responsible for PrP^C α-cleavage. Interestingly, the mutant G113V, corresponding to a hereditary form of prion disease in humans, displayed increased ^CtmPrP topology and decreased α-cleavage in our in vitro assay. In conclusion, HC represents an essential determinant for transmembrane PrP topology, whereas the high evolutionary conservation of this region is rather based upon preservation of PrP^C α-cleavage, thus highlighting the biological importance of this cleavage.     

Interaction of Peptide Aptamers with Prion Protein Central Domain Promotes α-Cleavage of PrP<Superscript>C</Superscript>

Prion diseases are infectious and fatal neurodegenerative diseases affecting humans and animals. Transmission is possible within and between species with zoonotic potential. Currently, no prophylaxis or treatment exists. Prions are composed of the misfolded isoform PrP^Sc of the cellular prion protein PrP^C. Expression of PrP^C is a prerequisite for prion infection, and conformational conversion of PrP^C is induced upon its direct interaction with PrP^Sc. Inhibition of this interaction can abrogate prion propagation, and we have previously established peptide aptamers (PAs) binding to PrP^C as new anti-prion compounds. Here, we mapped the interaction site of PA8 in PrP and modeled the complex in silico to design targeted mutations in PA8 which presumably enhance binding properties. Using these PA8 variants, we could improve PA-mediated inhibition of PrP^Sc replication and de novo infection of neuronal cells. Furthermore, we demonstrate that binding of PA8 and its variants increases PrP^C α-cleavage and interferes with its internalization. This gives rise to high levels of the membrane-anchored PrP-C1 fragment, a transdominant negative inhibitor of prion replication. PA8 and its variants interact with PrP^C at its central and most highly conserved domain, a region which is crucial for prion conversion and facilitates toxic signaling of Aβ oligomers characteristic for Alzheimer’s disease. Our strategy allows for the first time to induce α-cleavage, which occurs within this central domain, independent of targeting the responsible protease. Therefore, interaction of PAs with PrP^C and enhancement of α-cleavage represent mechanisms that can be beneficial for the treatment of prion and other neurodegenerative diseases.     

Unexpected Tolerance of α-Cleavage of the Prion Protein to Sequence Variations

The cellular form of the prion protein, PrP^C, undergoes extensive proteolysis at the α site (109K↓H110). Expression of non-cleavable PrP^C mutants in transgenic mice correlates with neurotoxicity, suggesting that α-cleavage is important for PrP^C physiology. To gain insights into the mechanisms of α-cleavage, we generated a library of PrP^C mutants with mutations in the region neighbouring the α-cleavage site. The prevalence of C1, the carboxy adduct of α-cleavage, was determined for each mutant. In cell lines of disparate origin, C1 prevalence was unaffected by variations in charge and hydrophobicity of the region neighbouring the α-cleavage site, and by substitutions of the residues in the palindrome that flanks this site. Instead, α-cleavage was size-dependently impaired by deletions within the domain 106–119. Almost no cleavage was observed upon full deletion of this domain. These results suggest that α-cleavage is executed by an α-PrPase whose activity, despite surprisingly limited sequence specificity, is dependent on the size of the central region of PrP^C.     

The PrPC C1 fragment derived from the ovine A136R154R171 PRNP allele is highly abundant in sheep brain and inhibits fibrillisation of full-length PrPC protein in vitro

Expression of the cellular prion protein (PrP^C) is crucial for the development of prion diseases. Resistance to prion diseases can result from reduced availability of the prion protein or from amino acid changes in the prion protein sequence. We propose here that increased production of a natural PrP α-cleavage fragment, C1, is also associated with resistance to disease. We show, in brain tissue, that ARR homozygous sheep, associated with resistance to disease, produced PrP^C comprised of 25% more C1 fragment than PrP^C from the disease-susceptible ARQ homozygous and highly susceptible VRQ homozygous animals. Only the C1 fragment derived from the ARR allele inhibits in-vitro fibrillisation of other allelic PrP^C variants. We propose that the increased α-cleavage of ovine ARR PrP^C contributes to a dominant negative effect of this polymorphism on disease susceptibility. Furthermore, the significant reduction in PrP^C β-cleavage product C2 in sheep of the ARR/ARR genotype compared to ARQ/ARQ and VRQ/VRQ genotypes, may add to the complexity of genetic determinants of prion disease susceptibility.     

Separate mechanisms act concurrently to shed and release the prion protein from the cell

The cellular prion protein (PrP^C) is attached to the cell membrane via its glycosylphosphatidylinositol (GPI)-anchor and is constitutively shed into the extracellular space. Here, three different mechanisms are presented that concurrently shed PrP^C from the cell. The fast α-cleavage released a N-terminal fragment (N1) into the medium and the extreme C-terminal cleavage shed soluble full-length (FL-S) PrP and C-terminally cleaved (C1-S) fragments outside the cell. Also, a slow exosomal release of full-length (FL) and C1-fragment (C1) was demonstrated. The three separate mechanisms acting simultaneously, but with different kinetics, have to be taken into consideration when elucidating functional roles of PrP^C and also when processing of PrP^C is considered as a target for intervention in prion diseases. Further, in this study it was shown that metalloprotease inhibitors affected the extreme C-terminal cleavage and shedding of PrP^C. The metalloprotease inhibitors did not influence the α-cleavage or the exosomal release. Taken together, these results are important for understanding the different mechanisms acting in parallel in the shedding and cleavage of PrP^C.     

Molecular model of an alpha-helical prion protein dimer and its monomeric subunits as derived from chemical cross-linking and molecular modeling calculations

Prions are the agents of a series of lethal neurodegenerative diseases. They are composed largely, if not entirely, of the host-encoded prion protein (PrP), which can exist in the cellular isoform PrP^C and the pathological isoform PrP^Sc. The conformational change of the α-helical PrP^C into β-sheet-rich PrP^Sc is the fundamental event of prion disease. The transition of recombinant PrP from a PrP^C-like into a PrP^Sc-like conformation can be induced in vitro by submicellar concentrations of SDS. An α-helical dimer was identified that might represent either the native state of PrP^C or the first step from the monomeric PrP^C to highly aggregated PrP^Sc. In the present study, the molecular structure of these dimers was analyzed by introducing covalent cross-links using 1-ethyl-3-(3-dimethylaminopropyl) carbodiimide. Inter- and intramolecular bonds between directly neighboured amino groups and carboxy groups were generated. The bonds formed in PrP dimers of recombinant PrP (90-231) were identified by tryptic digestion and subsequent mass spectrometric analysis. Intra- and intermolecular cross-links between N-terminal glycine and three acidic amino acid side chains in the globular part of PrP were identified, showing the N-terminal amino acids (90-124) are not as flexible as known from NMR analysis. When the cross-linked sites were used as structural constraint, molecular modeling calculations yielded a structural model for PrP dimer and its monomeric subunit, including the folding of amino acids 90-124 in addition to the known structure. Molecular dynamics of the structure after release of the constraint indicated an intrinsic stability of the domain of amino acids 90-124.     

Taking advantage of physiological proteolytic processing of the prion protein for a therapeutic perspective in prion and Alzheimer diseases

Prion and Alzheimer diseases are fatal neurodegenerative diseases caused by misfolding and aggregation of the cellular prion protein (PrP^C) and the β-amyloid peptide, respectively. Soluble oligomeric species rather than large aggregates are now believed to be neurotoxic. PrP^C undergoes three proteolytic cleavages as part of its natural life cycle, α-cleavage, β-cleavage, and ectodomain shedding. Recent evidences demonstrate that the resulting secreted PrP^C molecules might represent natural inhibitors against soluble toxic species. In this mini-review, we summarize recent observations suggesting the potential benefit of using PrP^C-derived molecules as therapeutic agents in prion and Alzheimer diseases.     

Homodimerization as a molecular switch between low and high efficiency PrPC cell surface delivery and neuroprotective activity

PrP^C is associated with a variety of functions, and its ability to interact with a multitude of partners, including itself, may largely explain PrP multifunctionality and the lack of consensus on the genuine physiological function of the protein in vivo. In contrast, there is a consensus in the literature that alterations in PrP^C trafficking and intracellular retention result in neuronal degeneration. In addition, a proteolytic modification in the late secretory pathway termed the α-cleavage induces the secretion of PrPN1, a PrP^C-derived metabolite with fascinating neuroprotective activity against toxic oligomeric Aβ molecules implicated in Alzheimer disease. Thus, studies focusing on understanding the regulation of PrP^C trafficking to the cell surface and the modulation of α-cleavage are essential. The objective of this commentary is to highlight recent evidences that PrP^C homodimerization stimulates trafficking of the protein to the cell surface and results in high levels of PrPN1 secretion. We also discuss a hypothetical model for these results and comment on future challenges and opportunities.     

The P’s and Q’s of cellular PrP-Aβ interactions

Prion disease research has opened up the “black-box” of neurodegeneration, defining a key role for protein misfolding wherein a predominantly alpha-helical precursor protein, PrP^C, is converted to a disease-associated, β-sheet enriched isoform called PrP^Sc. In Alzheimer disease (AD) the Aβ peptide derived from the β-amyloid precuror protein APP folds in β-sheet amyloid. Early thoughts along the lines of overlap may have been on target,¹ but were eclipsed by a simultaneous (but now anachronistic) controversy over the role of PrP^Sc in prion diseases.^2,3 Nonetheless, as prion diseases such as Creutzfeldt-Jakob Disease (CJD) are themselves rare and can include an overt infectious mode of transmission, and as familial prion diseases and familial AD involve different genes, an observer might reasonably have concluded that prion research could occasionally catalyze ideas in AD, but could never provide concrete overlaps at the mechanistic level. Surprisingly, albeit a decade or three down the road, several prion/AD commonalities can be found within the contemporary literature. One important prion/AD overlap concerns seeded spread of Aβ aggregates by intracerebral inoculation much like prions,⁴ and, with a neuron-to-neuron ‘spreading’ also reported for pathologic forms of other misfolded proteins, Tau^5,6 and α-synuclein in the case of Parkinson Disease.^7,8 The concept of seeded spread has been discussed extensively elsewhere, sometimes under the rubric of “prionoids”⁹, and lies outside the scope of this particular review where we will focus upon PrP^C. From this point the story can now be subdivided into four strands of investigation: (1) pathologic effects of Aβ can be mediated by binding to PrP^C,¹⁰ (2) the positioning of endoproteolytic processing events of APP by pathologic (β-cleavage + γ-cleavage) and non-pathologic (α-cleavage + γ-cleavage) secretase pathways is paralleled by seemingly analogous α- and β-like cleavage of PrP^C (Fig. 1) (3) similar lipid raft environments for PrP^C and APP processing machinery,^11-13 and perhaps in consequence, overlaps in repertoire of the PrP^C and APP protein interactors (“interactomes”),^14,15 and (4) rare kindreds with mixed AD and prion pathologies.¹⁶ Here we discuss confounds, consensus and conflict associated with parameters that apply to these experimental settings.     

Prion Protein NMR Structure from Tammar Wallaby (Macropus eugenii) Shows that the β2-α2 Loop Is Modulated by Long-Range Sequence Effects

NMR structures are presented for the recombinant construct of residues 121-230 from the tammar wallaby (Macropus eugenii) prion protein (PrP) twPrP(121-230) and for the variant mouse PrPs mPrP[Y225A,Y226A](121-231) and mPrP[V166A](121-231) at 20 °C and pH 4.5. All three proteins exhibit the same global architecture as seen in other recombinant PrP^Cs (cellular isoforms of PrP) and shown to prevail in natural bovine PrP^C. Special interest was focused on a loop that connects the β2-strand with helix α2 in the PrP^C fold, since there are indications from in vivo experiments that this local structural feature affects the susceptibility of transgenic mice to transmissible spongiform encephalopathies. This β2-α2 loop and helix α3 form a solvent-accessible contiguous epitope, which has been proposed to be the recognition area for a hypothetical chaperone, the “protein X”. This hypothetical chaperone would affect the conversion of PrP^C into the disease-related scrapie form (PrP^Sc) by moderating intermolecular interactions related to the transmission barrier of transmissible spongiform encephalopathies between different species. In contrast to mPrP(121-231) and most other mammalian PrP^Cs, the β2-α2 loop is well defined at 20 °C in tammar wallaby PrP and in the two aforementioned variants of mPrP, showing that long-range interactions with helix α3 can have an overriding influence on the structural definition of the β2-α2 loop. Further NMR studies with two variant mPrPs, mPrP[Y225A](121-231) and mPrP[Y226A](121-231), showed that these interactions are dominantly mediated by close contacts between residues 166 and 225. The results of the present study then lead to the intriguing indication that well-defined long-range intramolecular interactions could act as regulators of the functional specificity of PrP^C.     

PrP N-terminal domain triggers PrP(Sc)-like aggregation of Dpl

Transmissible spongiform encephalopathies are fatal neurodegenerative disorders thought to be transmitted by self-perpetuating conformational conversion of a neuronal membrane glycoprotein (PrP^C, for “cellular prion protein”) into an abnormal state (PrP^Sc, for “scrapie prion protein”). Doppel (Dpl) is a protein that shares significant biochemical and structural homology with PrP^C. In contrast to its homologue PrP^C, Dpl is unable to participate in prion disease progression or to achieve an abnormal PrP^Sc-like state. We have constructed a chimeric mouse protein, composed of the N-terminal domain of PrP^C (residues 23-125) and the C-terminal part of Dpl (residues 58-157). This chimeric protein displays PrP-like biochemical and structural features; when incubated in presence of NaCl, the α-helical monomer forms soluble β-sheet-rich oligomers which acquire partial resistance to pepsin proteolysis in vitro, as do PrP oligomers. Moreover, the presence of aggregates akin to protofibrils is observed in soluble oligomeric species by electron microscopy.     

Antibody binding modulates the dynamics of the membrane-bound prion protein

Misfolding of the cellular prion protein (PrP^C) is associated with lethal neurodegeneration. PrP^C consists of a flexible tail (residues 23–123) and a globular domain (residues 124–231) whose C-terminal end is anchored to the cell membrane. The neurotoxic antibody POM1 and the innocuous antibody POM6 recognize the globular domain. Experimental evidence indicates that POM1 binding to PrP^C emulates the influence on PrP^C of the misfolded prion protein (PrP^Sc) while the binding of POM6 has the opposite biological response. Little is known about the potential interactions between flexible tail, globular domain, and the membrane. Here, we used atomistic simulations to investigate how these interactions are modulated by the binding of the Fab fragments of POM1 and POM6 to PrP^C and by interstitial sequence truncations to the flexible tail. The simulations show that the binding of the antibodies restricts the range of orientations of the globular domain with respect to the membrane and decreases the distance between tail and membrane. Five of the six sequence truncations influence only marginally this distance and the contact patterns between tail and globular domain. The only exception is a truncation coupled to a charge inversion mutation of four N-terminal residues, which increases the distance of the flexible tail from the membrane. The interactions of the flexible tail and globular domain are modulated differently by the two antibodies.     

Role of ADAMs in the Ectodomain Shedding and Conformational Conversion of the Prion Protein

The cellular prion protein (PrP^C) is essential for the pathogenesis and transmission of prion diseases. PrP^C is bound to the plasma membrane via a glycosylphosphatidylinositol anchor, although a secreted, soluble form has also been identified. Previously we reported that PrP^C is subject to ectodomain shedding from the membrane by zinc metalloproteinases with a similar inhibition profile to those involved in shedding the amyloid precursor protein. Here we have used gain-of-function (overexpression) and loss-of-function (small interfering RNA knockdown) experiments in cells to identify the ADAMs (a disintegrin and metalloproteinases) involved in the ectodomain shedding of PrP^C. These experiments revealed that ADAM9 and ADAM10, but not ADAM17, are involved in the shedding of PrP^C and that ADAM9 exerts its effect on PrP^C shedding via ADAM10. Using dominant negative, catalytically inactive mutants, we show that the catalytic activity of ADAM9 is required for its effect on ADAM10. Mass spectrometric analysis revealed that ADAM10, but not ADAM9, cleaved PrP between Gly²²⁸ and Arg²²⁹, three residues away from the site of glycosylphosphatidylinositol anchor attachment. The shedding of another membrane protein, the amyloid precursor protein β-secretase BACE1, by ADAM9 is also mediated via ADAM10. Furthermore, we show that pharmacological inhibition of PrP^C shedding or activation of both PrP^C and PrP^Sc shedding by ADAM10 overexpression in scrapie-infected neuroblastoma N2a cells does not alter the formation of proteinase K-resistant PrP^Sc. Collectively, these data indicate that although PrP^C can be shed through the action of ADAM family members, modulation of PrP^C or PrP^Sc ectodomain shedding does not regulate prion conversion.The prion protein (PrP)³ is the causative agent of the transmissible spongiform encephalopathies such as Creutzfeldt-Jakob disease in humans, scrapie in sheep, bovine spongiform encephalopathy in cattle, and chronic wasting disease in deer and elk (1). In these diseases the cellular form of PrP (PrP^C) undergoes a conformational conversion to the infectious form PrP^Sc that is characterized biochemically by its resistance to digestion with proteinase K (PK) (2). Mature PrP^C is anchored to the extracellular surface of the cell membrane through a glycosylphosphatidylinositol (GPI) anchor and, like most GPI-anchored proteins, is clustered into cholesterol-rich, detergent-resistant membrane rafts (reviewed in Ref. 3). Although the precise subcellular site of conversion remains undefined, conformational conversion of PrP^C to PrP^Sc is believed to occur either at the cell surface or within the endocytic pathway (4–6).A number of studies indicate that modulation of PrP^C levels at the cell surface may represent a possible future disease intervention strategy. For example, the retention of PrP^C at the cell surface and concomitant prevention of its endocytosis through the use of PrP antibodies inhibited PrP^Sc formation (7). Furthermore, the sterol-binding polyene antibiotic filipin reduced endocytosis, and induced cellular release, of PrP^C with a concomitant reduction in PrP^Sc accumulation (8). More recently, it has been shown that modulation of cell surface PrP^C levels by the novel sorting nexin SNX33 can interfere with PrP^Sc formation in cultured cells (9). Nonetheless, the natural processes regulating PrP^C levels at the cell surface remain poorly defined. One such mechanism of regulation is via shedding of the bulk of the ectodomain of PrP^C either through cleavage of the polypeptide close to the GPI anchor or within the GPI anchor itself. Indeed, it has long been established that PrP^C can be shed into the medium of cultured cells and is present as a soluble form in vivo in human cerebrospinal fluid (10, 11).Numerous cell surface proteins can be proteolytically shed by the action of a group of zinc metalloproteinases known collectively as secretases or sheddases (reviewed in Refs. 12, 13). Whereas most proteolytically shed proteins are derived from transmembrane polypeptide-anchored substrates, several GPI-anchored proteins, including the folate receptor (14), the ecto-ADP-ribosyltransferase ART2.2 (15), and a GPI-anchored construct of angiotensin-converting enzyme (16) are shed by the action of metalloproteinases. We have previously shown that PrP^C can also be proteolytically shed from the cell surface through the action of one or more zinc metalloproteinases with similar properties to those of the α-secretases responsible for the shedding of the amyloid precursor protein (APP) of Alzheimer disease (17). This α-secretase-mediated ectodomain shedding of APP from the cell surface is carried out by at least three members of the a disintegrin and metalloproteinase (ADAM) family, namely ADAM9, -10, and -17 (reviewed in Ref. 18). In addition to cleavage by ADAMs, APP is also cleaved by the β-secretase, BACE1 (β-site APP-cleaving enzyme) and the γ-secretase complex to release the neurotoxic amyloid-β peptide (19). BACE1 itself is also subject to ectodomain shedding by as yet unidentified members of the ADAM family (20).The similarities between the ectodomain shedding of APP and PrP^C, in particular the similar profile of inhibition by a range of hydroxamate-based zinc metalloproteinase inhibitors (17), led us to investigate whether the same members of the ADAM family were also involved in the shedding of PrP^C. It should be noted that this ectodomain shedding of PrP^C by cleavage of the polypeptide chain near to the site (Ser²³¹) of GPI anchor addition in the C terminus of the protein is distinct from the so-called α-cleavage between residues 111 and 112 in the middle of the protein (21, 22). This latter “endoproteolytic” cleavage of PrP^C is reported to be carried out by members of the ADAM family (23, 24).To investigate the role of ADAMs in the ectodomain shedding of PrP^C, we used loss-of-function and gain-of-function experiments in cultured cells in which candidate PrP sheddases were either knocked down by siRNA or overexpressed. We have also further characterized the shedding of BACE1 by comparison to the shedding of APP and PrP^C. In addition, we have explored whether proteolytic shedding of PrP^C is of importance in regulating its conversion into PrP^Sc.     

The role of the prion protein in the internalization of α-synuclein amyloids

Synucleinopathies are a group of neurodegenerative diseases characterized by the accumulation of α-synuclein amyloids in several regions of the brain. α-Synuclein fibrils are able to spread via cell-to-cell transfer, and once inside the cells, they can template the misfolding and aggregation of the endogenous α-synuclein. Multiple mechanisms have been shown to participate in the process of propagation: endocytosis, tunneling nanotubes and macropinocytosis. Recently, we published a research showing that the cellular form of the prion protein (PrP^C) acts as a receptor for α-synuclein amyloid fibrils, facilitating their internalization through and endocytic pathway. This interaction occurs by a direct interaction between the fibrils and the N-terminal domain of PrP^C. In cell lines expressing the pathological form of PrP (PrP^Sc), the binding between PrP^C and α-synuclein fibrils prevents the formation and accumulation of PrP^Sc, since PrP^C is no longer available as a substrate for the pathological conversion templated by PrP^Sc. On the contrary, PrP^Sc deposits are cleared over passages, probably due to the increased processing of PrP^C into the neuroprotective fragments N1 and C1. Starting from these data, in this work we present new insights into the role of PrP^C in the internalization of protein amyloids and the possible therapeutic applications of these findings.     

Conformational detection of prion protein with biarsenical labeling and FlAsH fluorescence

Prion diseases are associated with the misfolding of the host-encoded cellular prion protein (PrP^C) into a disease associated form (PrP^Sc). Recombinant PrP can be refolded into either an α-helical rich conformation (α-PrP) resembling PrP^C or a β-sheet rich, protease resistant form similar to PrP^Sc. Here, we generated tetracysteine tagged recombinant PrP, folded this into α- or β-PrP and determined the levels of FlAsH fluorescence. Insertion of the tetracysteine tag at three different sites within the 91-111 epitope readily distinguished β-PrP from α-PrP upon FlAsH labeling. Labelling of tetracysteine tagged PrP in the α-helical form showed minimal fluorescence, whereas labeling of tagged PrP in the β-sheet form showed high fluorescence indicating that this region is exposed upon conversion. This highlights a region of PrP that can be implicated in the development of diagnostics and is a novel, protease free mechanism for distinguishing PrP^Sc from PrP^C. This technique may also be applied to any protein that undergoes conformational change and/or misfolding such as those involved in other neurodegenerative disorders including Alzheimer’s, Huntington’s and Parkinson’s diseases.     

Smad3 contributes to positioning of proliferating cells in colonic crypts by inducing EphB receptor protein expression

In prion diseases cellular prion protein (PrP^C) undergoes conformational transition into the β-sheet-rich form (PrP^Sc). PrP^C consists of the disordered N-terminal part and a C-terminal globular domain containing three α-helices (H1, H2, H3) and an antiparallel beta sheet (B1, B2). B2–H2 loop, which has a focal role in the species barrier, contains the highest density of asparagine (N) and glutamine (Q) residues in the whole sequence. Q/N-rich domains are essential for the conversion of yeast prions. We investigated the role of Q/N residues in the B2–H2 loop in PrP conversion. We prepared mouse PrP mutants with increasing number of consecutive Q/N residues in the B2–H2 loop. Stability of the mutants decreased with the increasing number of inserted glutamines. In vitro conversion of mutants yielded fibrils of similar morphology as the wild-type PrP. Q/N mutants accelerated fibrillization in comparison to the wild-type PrP, with mutant containing the most glutamines having the shortest lag phase. The effect of Q/N residues was specific for the B2–H2 loop and was not due to simple increase in flexibility as the introduction of Gly-Ser or Ala residues slowed the conversion despite their decreased stability. Our results thus suggest that Q/N residues in the B2–H2 loop of PrP promote protein conversion and may represent a link to conversion of Q/N-rich prions.