Changing frequency of pulsatile luteinizing hormone and progesterone secretion during the luteal phase of the menstrual cycle of rhesus monkeys

Experiments were conducted to examine the pulsatile nature of biologically active luteinizing hormone (LH) and progesterone secretion during the luteal phase of the menstrual cycle in rhesus monkeys. As the luteal phase progressed, the pulse frequency of LH release decreased dramatically from a high of one pulse every 90 min during the early luteal phase to a low of one pulse every 7-8 h during the late luteal phase. As the pulse frequency decreased, there was a corresponding increase in pulse amplitude. During the early luteal phase, progesterone secretion was not episodic and there were increments in LH that were not associated with elevations in progesterone. However, during the mid-late luteal phase, progesterone was secreted in a pulsatile fashion. During the midluteal phase (Days 6-7 post-LH surge), 67% of the LH pulses were associated with progesterone pulses, and by the late luteal phase (Days 10-11 post-LH surge), every LH pulse was accompanied by a dramatic and sustained release of progesterone. During the late luteal phase, when the LH profile was characterized by low-frequency, high-amplitude pulses, progesterone levels often rose from less than 1 ng/ml to greater than 9 ng/ml and returned to baseline within a 3-h period. Thus, a single daily progesterone determination is unlikely to be an accurate indicator of luteal function. These results suggest that the changing pattern of mean LH concentrations during the luteal phase occurs as a result of changes in frequency and amplitude of LH release. These changes in the pulsatile pattern of LH secretion appear to have profound effects on secretion of progesterone by the corpus luteum, especially during the mid-late luteal phase when the patterns of LH concentrations are correlated with those of progesterone.     

Opiatergic inhibition of pulsatile luteinizing hormone release during the menstrual cycle of rhesus macaques

The endogenous opioid peptides (EOPs) may inhibit the rate of hypothalamic gonadotropin-releasing hormone (GnRH) release and hence the frequency of pulsatile luteinizing hormone (LH) release, particularly in the luteal phase of the menstrual cycle. Our objectives were to compare the effects of an opiate antagonist, naloxone (NAL), on the patterns of LH, estradiol-17 beta (E2), and progesterone (P4) secretion during the follicular and luteal phases of the macaque menstrual cycle. Plasma levels of E2, P4, and bioactive LH were measured in serial, 15-min blood samples during 8-hr infusions of NAL (2 mg/hr) or saline, either on Days 5 or 6 of the follicular phase (FN and FS, n = 5 and 4, respectively) or on Days 8, 9, or 10 of the luteal phase (LN and LS, n = 5 each) of a menstrual cycle. The pulsatile parameters of each hormone were determined by PULSAR analysis and the correspondence of steroid pulses with those of LH were analyzed for each cycle stage in each animal. As expected, LH mean levels and pulse frequencies in LS monkeys were only about one-third of those values in FS animals. NAL had no effects on pulsatile LH, E2, or P4 release during the follicular phase. In contrast, luteal phase NAL infusions increased both LH mean levels and pulse frequencies to values which were indistinguishable from those in FS animals. LH pulse amplitudes did not differ among the four groups. Mean levels and pulse frequencies of P4 secretion in LS monkeys were about 4- and 14-fold greater than those values in FS animals. Mean levels and pulse amplitudes of P4 release in LN animals were greater than those values in all other groups. LH and E2 pulses were not closely correlated in follicular phase animals, and this pulse association was not altered by NAL. In FS monkeys, LH and P4 pulses were not correlated; however, NAL increased this LH-p4 pulse correspondence. LH and P4 pulses were closely correlated in luteal phase animals and this association was not affected by NAL. Our data suggest that the EOPs inhibit the frequency of pulsatile LH secretion in the presence of luteal phase levels of P4. During the midfollicular phase when LH pulses occur every 60 to 90 min, the opioid antagonist NAL alters neither the pulsatile pattern of LH release nor E2 secretion, but NAL may directly affect P4-secreting cells.     

Effects of an opioid antagonist on pulsatile luteinizing hormone secretion in the ewe vary with changes in steroid negative feedback

In ewes during the breeding season, estradiol (E) and progesterone (P) synergistically regulate pulsatile luteinizing hormone (LH) secretion. E primarily inhibits LH pulse amplitude and P inhibits LH pulse frequency. To determine if endogenous opioid peptides (EOP) mediate these negative feedback effects, we administered the long-acting opioid antagonist WIN 44,441-3 (WIN) to intact ewes during the luteal and follicular phases of the estrous cycle and to ovariectomized ewes treated with no steroids, E, P, or E plus P. Steroid levels were maintained at levels seen during the estrous cycle by Silastic implants placed shortly after surgery. WIN increased LH pulse frequency, but not amplitude, in luteal phase ewes. In contrast, during the follicular phase, LH pulse amplitude was increased by WIN and pulse frequency was unchanged. Neither LH pulse frequency nor pulse amplitude was affected by WIN in long-term ovariectomized ewes untreated with steroids. In contrast, WIN slightly increased LH pulse frequency in short-term ovariectomized ewes. WIN also increased LH pulse frequency in ovariectomized ewes treated with P or E plus P. WIN did not affect pulse frequency but did increase LH pulse amplitude in E-treated ewes. These results support the hypothesis that EOP participate in the negative feedback effects of E and P on pulsatile LH secretion during the breeding season and that the inhibitory effects of EOP may persist for some time after ovariectomy.     

Influence of hormonal contraceptives on the pituitary response to LH/FSH-releasing hormone.

In the pre-ovulatory phase the absolute and relative LH increase was much greater than during the luteal phase and less pronounced in the early follicular phase of the normal cycle. FSH release was affected only during the pre-ovulatory period, where a retarded, 3- or 4-fold increase compared to basal levels was recorded. In the women taking oral contraceptives of the conventional type the first LH-RH test showed gonadotropin responses similar to those obtained during the luteal phase of the controls. The second test brought a significantly lower LH response, suggesting an increasing exogenous steroid inhibition at the pituitary level in the course of the therapeutic cycle. This inhibition seems to be reversed during the monthly tablet-free interval. A particularly small and retarded gonadotropin response was observed in patients taking Deposiston. These results are discussed as to their clinical significance.     

The temporal relationship between patterns of LH and FSH secretion, and development of ovulatory-sized follicles during the mid- to late-luteal phase of sheep

The aim of the present study was to investigate the temporal relationship between the secretory pattern of serum LH and FSH concentrations and waves of ovarian antral follicles during the luteal phase of the estrous cycle in sheep. The growth pattern of ovarian antral follicles and CL were monitored by transrectal ultrasonography and gonadotropin concentrations were measured in blood samples collected every 12 min for 6 h/d from 7 to 14 d after ovulation. There were two follicular waves (penultimate and final waves of the cycle) emerging and growing during the period of intensive blood sampling. Mean and basal LH concentrations and LH pulse frequency increased (P < 0.001) with decreasing progesterone concentration at the end of the cycle. Mean and basal FSH concentrations reached a peak (P < 0.01) on the day of follicular wave emergence before declining to a nadir by 2 d after emergence. None of the parameters of pulsatile LH secretion varied significantly with either the emergence of the final follicular wave or with the end of the growth phase of the largest follicle of the penultimate wave of the cycle. However, mean and basal LH concentrations did increase (P < 0.05) after the end of the growth phase of the largest follicle of the final follicular wave of the cycle. Furthermore, the end of the growth phase of the largest follicle of the final wave coincided with functional luteolysis. In summary, there was no abrupt or short-term change in pulsatile LH secretion in association with the emergence or growth of the largest follicle of a wave. We concluded that the emergence and growth of ovarian antral follicles in follicular waves do not require changes in LH secretion, but may involve changes in sensitivity of ovarian follicles to serum LH concentrations.     

Differential effects of LH-RH immunoneutralization on LH and FSH secretion in the ewe

Neutralization of LH-RH by injection of an ovine antiserum to LH-RH in ewes during the late follicular phase of the oestrous cycle resulted in an immediate blockade of pulsatile secretion of LH. Plasma concentrations of FSH gradually rose in the antiserum-treated ewes during the 36-h study period but levels declined in control ewes. These results show that, in the ewe, pulsatile LH secretion is dependent on LH-RH from the hypothalamus, while FSH is largely unresponsive to short-term reduction of LH-RH stimulation. Since reduction in LH secretion is likely to reduce ovarian function, the changes in FSH secretion may be attributed to the removal of a negative feedback influence of an ovarian factor, perhaps oestradiol, on FSH secretion.     

Naloxone enhances LH but not FSH release during various phases of the estrous cycle in the ewe

Suffolk x whiteface ewes were infused with 0.5 mg/kg/hr naloxone hydrochloride (NAL) for 6 hrs during the early, mid and late luteal and early follicular phases of the estrous cycle. Basal serum luteinizing hormone (LH) concentration was increased by NAL during each trial in the luteal phase and LH pulse amplitude was proportionately increased by 158%, 164% and 350% during the early luteal, mid luteal and early follicular phases, respectively. The apparent NAL induced increase (92%) in LH pulse amplitude during the late luteal phase was not significant. NAL only affected LH pulse frequency during the early follicular phase, when it was decreased. Mean serum follicle stimulating hormone (FSH) concentration was not affected by NAL. The results of this study indicate that endogenous opioid peptides (EOPs) may partially mediate the suppressive influence of estradiol-17 beta (E2) on LH pulse amplitude and also the stimulatory effect of E2 on LH pulse frequency in the early follicular phase. The data may suggest that NAL enhances the amplitude of pulses of gonadotropin releasing hormone (GnRH) by counteracting E2 inhibitory effects on LH release at the level of the pituitary. Alternately, some component of E2 feedback may be an EOP mediated component at the level of the hypothalamus.     

Fetal programming: testosterone exposure of the female sheep during midgestation disrupts the dynamics of its adult gonadotropin secretion during the periovulatory period

Prenatal exposure of the female sheep to excess testosterone (T) leads to hypergonadotropism, multifollicular ovaries, and progressive loss of reproductive cycles. We have determined that prenatal T treatment delays the latency of the estradiol (E2)-induced LH surge. To extend this finding into a natural physiological context, the present study was conducted to determine if the malprogrammed surge mechanism alters the reproductive cycle. Specifically, we wished to determine if prenatal T treatment 1) delays the onset of the preovulatory gonadotropin surge during the natural follicular phase rise in E2, 2) alters pulsatile LH secretion and the dynamics of the secondary FSH surge, and 3) compromises the ensuing luteal function. Females prenatally T-treated from Day 60 to Day 90 of gestation (147 days is term) and control females were studied when they were approximately 2.5 yr of age. Reproductive cycles of control and prenatally T-treated females were synchronized with PGF2alpha, and peripheral blood samples were collected every 2 h for 120 h to characterize cyclic changes in E2, LH, and FSH and then daily for 14 days to monitor changes in luteal progesterone. To assess LH pulse patterns, blood samples were also collected frequently (each 5 min for 6 h) during the follicular and luteal phases of the cycle. The results revealed that, in prenatally T-treated females, 1) the preovulatory increase in E2 was normal; 2) the latencies between the preovulatory increase in E2 and the peaks of the primary LH and FSH surges were longer, but the magnitudes similar; 3) follicular-phase LH pulse frequency was increased; 4) the interval between the primary and secondary FSH surges was reduced but there was a tendency for an increase in duration of the secondary FSH surge; but 5) luteal progesterone patterns were in general unaltered. Thus, exposure of the female to excess T before birth produces perturbances and maltiming in periovulatory gonadotropin secretory dynamics, but these do not produce apparent defects in cycle regularity or luteal function. To reveal the pathologies that lead to the eventual subfertility arising from excess T exposure during midgestation, studies at older ages must be conducted to assess if there is progressive disruption of neuroendocrine and ovarian function.     

Changes in patterns of luteinizing hormone secretion before and after the first ovulation in the postpartum mare

To determine whether luteinizing hormone (LH) secretion during the first estrous cycle postpartum is characterized by pulsatile release, circulating LH concentrations were measured in 8 postpartum mares, 4 of which had been treated with 150 mg progesterone and 10 mg estradiol daily for 20 days after foaling to delay ovulation. Blood samples were collected every 15 min for 8 h on 4 occasions: 3 times during the follicular phase (Days 2-4, 5-7, and 8-11 after either foaling or end of steroid treatment), and once during the luteal phase (Days 5-8 after ovulation). Ovulation occurred in 4 mares 13.2 +/- 0.6 days postpartum and in 3 of 4 mares 12.0 +/- 1.1 days post-treatment. Before ovulation, low-amplitude LH pulses (approximately 1 ng/ml) were observed in 3 mares; such LH pulses occurred irregularly (1-2/8 h) and were unrelated to mean circulating LH levels, which gradually increased from less than 1 ng/ml at foaling or end of steroid treatment to maximum levels (12.3 ng/ml) within 48 h after ovulation. In contrast, 1-3 high-amplitude LH pulses (3.7 +/- 0.7 ng/ml) were observed in 6 of 7 mares during an 8-h period of the luteal phase. The results suggest that in postpartum mares LH release is pulsatile during the luteal phase of the estrous cycle, whereas before ovulation LH pulses cannot be readily identified.     

The introduction of rams induces an increase in pulsatile LH secretion in cyclic ewes during the breeding season

Application of the ram effect during the breeding season has been previously disregarded because the ewe reproductive axis is powerfully inhibited by luteal phase progesterone concentrations. However, anovulatory ewes treated with exogenous progestagens respond to ram introduction with an increase in LH concentrations. We therefore tested whether cyclic ewes would respond to ram introduction with an increase in pulsatile LH secretion at all stages of the estrous cycle. We did two experiments using genotypes native to temperate or Mediterranean regions. In Experiment 1 (UK), 12 randomly cycling, North of England Mule ewes were introduced to rams midway through a frequent blood-sampling regime. Ewes in the early (EL; n=3) [corrected] and late luteal (LL; n=6) phase responded to ram introduction with an increase in LH pulse frequency and mean and basal concentration [corrected] of LH (at least P<0.05). In Experiment 2 (Australia), the cycles of 32 Merino ewes were synchronised using intravaginal progestagen pessaries. Pessary insertion was staggered to produce eight ewes at each stage of the estrous cycle: follicular (F), early luteal (EL), mid-luteal (ML) and late luteal (LL). In all stages of the cycle, ewes responded to ram introduction with an increase in LH pulse frequency (P<0.01); EL, ML and LL ewes also had an increase in mean LH concentration (P<0.05). In conclusion, ram introduction to cyclic ewes stimulated an increase in pulsatile LH secretion, independent of ewe genotype or stage of the estrous cycle.     

Suppression of pulsatile luteinizing hormone secretion by gonadotrophin-releasing hormone antagonist does not affect episodic progesterone secretion or corpus luteum function in ewes.

Progesterone secretion has been observed to be episodic in the late luteal phase of the oestrous cycle of ewes and is apparently independent of luteinizing hormone (LH). This study investigated the effects of suppressing the pulsatile release of LH in the early or late luteal phase on the episodic secretion of progesterone. Six Scottish Blackface ewes were treated i.m. with 1 mg kg-1 body weight of a potent gonadotrophin-releasing hormone (GnRH) antagonist on either day 4 or day 11 of the luteal phase. Six ewes received saline at each time and acted as controls. Serial blood samples were collected at 10 or 15 min intervals between 0 and 8 h, 24 and 32 h, and 48 and 56 h after GnRH antagonist treatment and daily from oestrus (day 0) of the treatment cycle for 22 days. Oestrous behaviour was determined using a vasectomized ram present throughout the experiment. Progesterone secretion was episodic in both the early and late luteal phase with a frequency of between 1.6 and 3.2 pulses in 8 h. The GnRH antagonist abolished the pulsatile secretion and suppressed the basal concentrations of LH for at least 3 days after treatment. This suppression of LH, in either the early or late luteal phase, did not affect the episodic release of progesterone. Daily concentrations of progesterone in plasma showed a minimal reduction on days 11 to 14 after GnRH antagonist treatment on day 4, although this was significant (P < 0.05) only on days 11 and 13. There was no effect of treatment on day 11 on daily progesterone concentration, and the timing of luteolysis and the duration of corpus luteum function was unaffected by GnRH antagonist treatment on either day 4 or day 11. These results indicate that the episodic secretion of progesterone during the luteal phase of the oestrous cycle in ewes is independent of LH pulses and normal progesterone secretion by the corpus luteum can be maintained with minimal basal concentrations of LH.     

Superfused pituitary cell cultures: comparative responsiveness of cells derived from various stages of the estrous cycle to LHRH stimulation administered as short duration pulses

We have reinvestigated the question of maintenance of differential LHRH sensitivity in culture and further investigated the role of pulsatile LHRH in the in vitro release of pulsatile LH and FSH at different stages of the estrous cycle. Pituitaries were collected on each day of the 4 day cycle at 0800. In addition, pituitaries were also collected at 1500 and 1900 on proestrous. The cells were dispersed and exposed 48 hrs later to short duration 4 ng LHRH pulses; this dose was optimized for LH release and was applied at a frequency of 1 pulse/60 min. In terms of absolute magnitude of LH response, observed responsiveness was ranked in the following order: proestrous 1900 greater than estrous 0800 greater than diestrous 1 0800 greater than proestrous 1500 greater than diestrous 2 0800. Responsiveness was significantly greater at proestrous 1900 (p greater than 0.01), estrous 0800 (p greater than 0.05) and diestrous 1 0800 (p greater than 0.05) when compared to either of the other stages tested. The heightened LHRH sensitivity of proestrous was therefore maintained in cell culture indicating that the system should be valid for conducting studies on the control of gonadotropin secretion during this period. FSH did not respond in pulsatile manner to the LHRH levels employed further substantiating recent evidence that LHRH seems to function somehow less directly in FSH as compared to LH secretion.     

Perioestrous patterns of circulating LH,FSH, prolactin and oestradiol-17β in the gilt

Concentrations of luteinizing hormone (LH), follicle stimulating hormone (FSH) and prolactin (PRL) were measured in jugular blood and those of oestradiol-17β (E₂17β) in utero-ovarian blood. Samples were taken from five intact gilts every 15 min for 108 h starting between day 15 and day 18 of the oestrous cycle. In the late luteal/early follicular phase, high pulsatile LH secretion, close to one pulse per hour, was observed. This could be the stimulus necessary for the final maturation of the ovarian follicles.Thereafter, frequency and amplitude of pulses, and the baseline value, decreased and were low at least between 36 and 12 h before the preovulatory LH surge. PRL and FSH concentrations also declined. This was probably due to the increase of oestrogen secretion. As E₂17β concentrations were still high, the surge of LH which was accompanied by increase in FSH and PRL, occurred for approximately 13 to 20 h. While LH and PRL mean levels decreased, FSH concentrations continued to increase. Peaks of PRL were observed during the late luteal/early follicular phase and during the LH discharge. During the period of estrus, each exposure to the boar was immediately followed by one of these peaks, which could play a role in the sexual behavior of the gilt.     

An ultrasound-aided study of temporal relationships between the patterns of LH/FSH secretion, development of ovulatory-sized antral follicles and formation of corpora lutea in ewes

To characterize the pulsatile secretion of LH and FSH and their relationships with various stages of follicular wave development (follicles growing from 3 to > or =5 mm) and formation of corpora lutea (CL), 6 Western white-faced ewes underwent ovarian ultrasonography and intensive blood sampling (every 12 min for 6 h) each day, for 10 and 8 consecutive days, commencing 1 and 2 d after estrus, respectively. Basal serum concentrations of LH and LH pulse frequency declined, whereas LH pulse duration and FSH pulse frequency increased by Day 7 after ovulation (P<0.05). LH pulse amplitude increased (P<0.05) at the end of the growth phase of the largest ovarian follicles in the first follicular wave of the cycle. The amplitude and duration of LH pulses rose (P<0.05) 1 d after CL detection. Mean and basal serum FSH concentrations increased (P<0.05) on the day of emergence of the second follicular wave, and also at the beginning of the static phase of the largest ovarian follicles in the first follicular wave of the cycle. FSH pulse frequency increased (P<0.05) during the growth phase of emergent follicles in the second follicle wave. The detection of CL was associated with a transient decrease in mean and basal serum concentrations of FSH (P<0.05), and it was followed by a transient decline in FSH pulse frequency (P<0.05). These results indicate that LH secretion during the luteal phase of the sheep estrous cycle reflects primarily the stage of development of the CL, and only a rise in LH pulse amplitude may be linked to the end of the growth phase of the largest follicles of waves. Increases in mean and basal serum concentrations of FSH are tightly coupled with the days of follicular wave emergence, and they also coincide with the end of the growth phase of the largest follicles in a previous wave, but FSH pulse frequency increases during the follicle growth phase, especially at mid-cycle.     

Seasonal changes of gonadotropin-releasing hormone secretion in the ewe.

A sustained volley of high-frequency pulses of GnRH secretion is a fundamental step in the sequence of neuroendocrine events leading to ovulation during the breeding season of sheep. In the present study, the pattern of GnRH secretion into pituitary portal blood was examined in ewes during both the breeding and anestrous seasons, with a focus on determining whether the absence of ovulation during the nonbreeding season is associated with the lack of a sustained increase in pulsatile GnRH release. During the breeding season, separate groups (n = 5) of ovary-intact ewes were sampled during the midluteal phase of the estrous cycle and following the withdrawal of progesterone (removal of progesterone implants) to synchronize onset of the follicular phase. During the nonbreeding season, another two groups (n = 5) were sampled either in the absence of hormonal treatments or following withdrawal of progesterone. Pituitary portal and jugular blood for measurement of GnRH and LH, respectively, were sampled every 10 min for 6 h during the breeding season or for 12 h in anestrus. During the breeding season, mean frequency of episodic GnRH release was 1.4 pulses/6 h in luteal-phase ewes; frequency increased to 7.8 pulses/6 h during the follicular phase (following progesterone withdrawal). In marked contrast, GnRH pulse frequency was low (mean less than 1 pulse/6 h) in both groups of anestrous ewes (untreated and following progesterone withdrawal), but GnRH pulse amplitude exceeded that in both luteal and follicular phases of the estrous cycle.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)     

Changes in the ovarian dynamics and endocrine profiles in goats treated with a progesterone antagonist during the early luteal phase of the estrous cycle

The aim of the present study was to determine the physiological role of endogenous progesterone in the regulation of ovarian dynamics, gonadotropin and progesterone secretion during the early luteal phase in the goat. Cycling Shiba goats received subcutaneously a vehicle (control group, n=5) or 50 mg of RU486 (RU486 group, n=4) daily from 1 to 7 days after ovulation (day 0) determined by transrectal ultrasonography. Ovarian dynamics were monitored by the ultrasonography and blood samples were collected daily until the subsequent ovulation for analysis of progesterone, luteinizing hormone (LH) and follicle stimulating hormone (FSH) secretion. Blood samples were also collected at 10 min intervals for 6 h on day 3 and day 7 for the analysis of pulsatile patterns of LH and FSH. The LH pulse frequency was significantly (P<0.05) higher in the RU486 group than in the control group on day 7 (4.8+/-1.1 pulses/6 h versus 1.2+/-0.4 pulses/6 h). The shape of the FSH pulses was unclear on day 3 and day 7 in both groups and the overall means of FSH concentration for 6 h on day 3 and day 7 were not significantly different between the RU486 and the control groups. The pattern of daily FSH concentrations showed a wave-like fluctuation in both groups. There was no significant difference in the inter-peak intervals of the wave-like pattern of daily FSH secretion between the RU486 and the control groups (4.1+/-0.6 days versus 4.5+/-0.6 days). The maximum diameter of the largest follicle that grew from day 1 to day 7 in the RU486 group tended to be greater than that in control goats (6.4+/-0.8 mm versus 5.0+/-0.8 mm, P=0.050), whereas no significant difference was detected in the size of the corpus luteum and progesterone concentrations between the control and RU486 groups on almost all days during the treatment period. These results indicate that the rise of the progesterone concentration suppresses the pulsatile LH secretion and follicular growth, whereas progesterone has no physiological role in the regulation of FSH secretion and luteal function during the early luteal phase of the estrous cycle in goats.     

Steroid feedback inhibition of pulsatile secretion of gonadotropin-releasing hormone in the ewe

The long-term negative feedback effects of sustained elevations in circulating estradiol and progesterone on the pulsatile secretion of gonadotropin-releasing hormone (GnRH) and luteinizing hormone (LH) were evaluated in the ewe following ovariectomy during the mid-late anestrous and early breeding seasons. GnRH secretion was monitored in serial samples of hypophyseal portal blood. Steroids were administered from the time of ovariectomy by s.c. Silastic implants, which maintained plasma concentrations of estradiol and progesterone at levels resembling those that circulate during the mid-luteal phase of the estrous cycle; control ewes did not receive steroidal replacement. Analysis of hormonal pulse patterns in serial samples during 6-h periods on Days 8-10 after ovariectomy disclosed discrete, concurrent pulses of GnRH in hypothalamo-hypophyseal portal blood and LH in peripheral blood of untreated ovariectomized ewes. These pulses occurred every 97 min on the average. Treatment with either estradiol or progesterone greatly diminished or abolished detectable pulsatile secretion of GnRH and LH, infrequent pulses being evident in only 3 of 19 steroid-treated ewes. No major seasonal difference was observed in GnRH or LH pulse patterns in any group of ewes. Our findings in the ovariectomized ewe provide direct support for the conclusion that the negative-feedback effects of estradiol and progesterone on gonadotropin secretion in the ewe include an action on the brain and a consequent inhibition of pulsatile GnRH secretion.     

Gonadotropin-releasing hormone in third ventricular cerebrospinal fluid of the heifer during the estrous cycle

The release profile of GnRH in cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) and its correlation with LH in peripheral blood of ovary-intact heifers during the estrous cycle were investigated. A silicon catheter was placed into the third ventricle of six heifers using ultrasonography. During the mid-luteal phase, the heifers were injected with prostaglandin F(2alpha) to induce luteolysis. Surges of CSF GnRH (66.7 h after prostaglandin F(2alpha) administration) and peripheral LH (66.3 h) occurred simultaneously and were coincident with the onset of estrus (67.0 h). Duration of elevated GnRH concentration considerably overlapped with the estrous phase in each of the heifers. Mean pulse frequencies of both GnRH and LH were significantly higher during the proestrous and early luteal phases than during the mid-luteal phase, while mean concentration and pulse amplitude of both GnRH and LH were not different between these three phases. Of all the GnRH pulses identified, more than 80% were accompanied by an LH pulse during the proestrous and early luteal phases. However, the proportion of GnRH pulses that were coincident with an LH pulse during the mid-luteal phase decreased to 60%. The results clearly demonstrate that a dynamic (pulse) and longer-term (surge) changes of GnRH release into CSF are physiologically expressed during the estrous cycle in heifers, and the pattern of pulsatile GnRH secretion in heifers depends upon their estrous cycle.     

LH secretion around the time of the preovulatory gonadotrophin surge in the ewe

Blood samples were taken once an hour from 17 ewes starting on Day 15 of a natural oestrous cycle and continuing for 4 days or until 36 h after the onset of oestrus. On Days 12, 16, 17 and 18 of the cycle, blood samples were also taken every 5 min for 6 h, between 09:00 and 15:00 h. LH pulse frequency rose and amplitude fell between the luteal and follicular phase of the oestrous cycle ( ). In the period from 48 h before to 40 h past the peak of the preovulatory LH surge, LH pulse frequency did not change. LH pulse amplitude was similar prior to and following the LH surge. During the preovulatory LH surge, LH pulse amplitude rose markedly ( ), with the visible, discrete components of pulses ranging from twice to 20 times those seen prior to or following the surge. The amplitude of LH pulses on the downslope of the LH surge was greater than that on the upslope of the surge (P < 0.05). We conclude that the preovulatory LH surge may consist of an amalgamation of high frequency, high amplitude pulses of LH secretion.     

Influence of the degree of stimulation of the pituitary by gonadotropin-releasing hormone on the action of inhibin and testosterone to suppress the secretion of the gonadotropins in rams

This experiment determined if the degree of stimulation of the pituitary gland by GnRH affects the suppressive actions of inhibin and testosterone on gonadotropin secretion in rams. Two groups (n = 5) of castrated adult rams underwent hypothalamopituitary disconnection and were given two i.v. injections of vehicle or 0.64 microg/kg of recombinant human inhibin A (rh-inhibin) 6 h apart when treated with i.m. injections of oil and testosterone propionate every 12 h for at least 7 days. Each treatment was administered when the rams were infused i.v. with 125 ng of GnRH every 4 h (i.e., slow-pulse frequency) and 125 ng of GnRH every hour (i.e., fast-pulse frequency). The FSH concentrations and LH pulse amplitude were lower and the LH concentrations higher during the fast GnRH pulse frequency. The GnRH pulse frequency did not influence the ability of rh-inhibin and testosterone to suppress FSH secretion. Testosterone did not affect LH secretion. Following rh-inhibin treatment, LH pulse amplitude decreased at the slow, but not at the fast, GnRH pulse frequency, and LH concentrations decreased at both GnRH pulse frequencies. We conclude that the degree of stimulation of the pituitary by GnRH does not influence the ability of inhibin or testosterone to suppress FSH secretion in rams. Inhibin may be capable of suppressing LH secretion under conditions of low GnRH.