From Whole-body Sections Down to Cellular Level,Multiscale Imaging of Phospholipids by MALDI Mass Spectrometry

Significant progress in instrumentation and sample preparation approaches have recently expanded the potential of MALDI imaging mass spectrometry to the analysis of phospholipids and other endogenous metabolites naturally occurring in tissue specimens. Here we explore some of the requirements necessary for the successful analysis and imaging of phospholipids from thin tissue sections of various dimensions by MALDI time-of-flight mass spectrometry. We address methodology issues relative to the imaging of whole-body sections such as those cut from model laboratory animals, sections of intermediate dimensions typically prepared from individual organs, as well as the requirements for imaging areas of interests from these sections at a cellular scale spatial resolution. We also review existing limitations of MALDI imaging MS technology relative to compound identification. Finally, we conclude with a perspective on important issues relative to data exploitation and management that need to be solved to maximize biological understanding of the tissue specimen investigated.Since its introduction in the late 90s (1), MALDI imaging mass spectrometry (MS) technology has witnessed a phenomenal expansion. Initially introduced for the mapping of intact proteins from fresh frozen tissue sections (2), imaging MS is now routinely applied to a wide range of different compounds including peptides, proteins, lipids, metabolites, and xenobiotics (3–7). Numerous compound-specific sample preparation protocols and analytical strategies have been developed. These include tissue sectioning and handling (8–14), automated matrix deposition approaches and data acquisition strategies (15–21), and the emergence of in situ tissue chemistries (22–25). Originally performed on sections cut from fresh frozen tissue specimens, methodologies incorporating an in situ enzymatic digestion step prior to matrix application have been optimized to access the proteome locked in formalin-fixed paraffin-embedded tissue biopsies (25–29). The possibility to use tissues preserved using non-cross-linking approaches has also been demonstrated (30–32). These methodologies are of high importance for the study of numerous diseases because they potentially allow the retrospective analysis for biomarker validation and discovery of the millions of tissue biopsies currently stored worldwide in tissue banks and repositories.In the past decade, instrumentation for imaging MS has also greatly evolved. Whereas the first MS images were collected with time-of-flight instruments (TOF) capable of repetition rates of a few hertz, modern systems are today capable of acquiring data in the kilohertz range and above with improved sensitivity, mass resolving power, and accuracy, significantly reducing acquisition time and improving image quality (33, 34). Beyond time-of-flight analyzers, other MALDI-based instruments have been used such as ion traps (35–37), Qq TOF instruments (38–40), and trap-TOF (16, 41). Ion mobility technology has also been used in conjunction with imaging MS (42–44). More recently, MALDI FT/ICR and Orbitrap mass spectrometers have been demonstrated to be extremely valuable instruments for the performance of imaging MS at very high mass resolving power (45–47). These non-TOF-based systems have proven to be extremely powerful for the imaging of lower molecular weight compounds such as lipids, drugs, and metabolites. Home-built instrumentation and analytical approaches to probe tissues at higher spatial resolution (1–10 μm) have also been described (48–50). In parallel to instrumentation developments, automated data acquisition, image visualization, and processing software packages have now also been developed by most manufacturers.To date, a wide range of biological systems have been studied using imaging MS as a primary methodology. Of strong interest are the organization and identification of the molecular composition of diseased tissues in direct correlation with the underlying histology and how it differs from healthy tissues. Such an approach has been used for the study of cancers (51–54), neurologic disorders (55–57), and other diseases (58, 59). The clinical potential of the imaging MS technology is enormous (7, 60, 61). Results give insights into the onset and progression of diseases, identify novel sets of disease-specific markers, and can provide a molecular confirmation of diagnosis as well as aide in outcome prediction (62–64). Imaging MS has also been extensively used to study the development, functioning, and aging of different organs such as the kidney, prostate, epididymis, and eye lens (65–70). Beyond the study of isolated tissues or organs, whole-body sections from several model animals such as leeches, mice, and rats have been investigated (71–74). For these analyses, specialized instrumentation and protocols are necessary for tissue sectioning and handling (72, 73). Whole-body imaging MS opens the door to the study of the localization and accumulation of administered pharmaceuticals and their known metabolites at the level of entire organisms as well as the monitoring of their efficacy or toxicity as a function of time or dose (72, 73, 75, 76).There is considerable interest in determining the identification and localization of small biomolecules such as lipids in tissues because they are involved in many essential biological functions including cell signaling, energy storage, and membrane structure and function. Defects in lipid metabolism play a role in many diseases such as muscular dystrophy and cardiovascular disease. Phospholipids in tissues have been intensively studied by several groups (37, 40, 77–83). In this respect, for optimal recovery of signal, several variables such as the choice of matrix for both imaging and fragmentation, solvent system, and instrument polarity have been investigated (20, 84). Particularly, the use of lithium cation adducts to facilitate phospholipid identification by tandem MS directly from tissue has also been reported (85). Of significant interest is the recent emergence of two new solvent-free matrix deposition approaches that perform exceptionally well for phospholipid imaging analyses. The first approach, described by Hankin et al. (86), consists in depositing the matrix on the sections through a sublimation process. The described sublimation system consists of sublimation glassware, a heated sand or oil bath (100–200 °C), and a primary vacuum pump (∼5 × 10⁻² torr). Within a few minutes of initiating the sublimation process, an exceptionally homogeneous film of matrix forms on the section. The thickness of the matrix may be controlled by regulating pressure, temperature, and sublimation time. The second approach, described by Puolitaival et al.(87), uses a fine mesh sieve (≤20 μm) to filter finely ground matrix on the tissue sections. Agitation of the sieve results in passage of the matrix through the mesh and the deposition of a fairly homogeneous layer of submicrometer matrix crystals of the surface of the sections. The matrix density on the sections is controlled by direct observation using a standard light microscope. This matrix deposition approach was also found to be ideal to image certain drug compounds (88, 89). Both strategies allow very rapid production of homogeneous matrix coatings on tissue sections with a fairly inexpensive setup. Signal recovery was found to be comparable with those obtained by conventional spray deposition. With the appropriate size sublimation device or sieve, larger sections with dimensions of several centimeters such as those cut from mouse or rat whole bodies can also be rapidly and homogeneously coated.Here we present several examples of MALDI imaging MS of phospholipids from tissue sections using TOF mass spectrometers over a wide range of dimensions from whole-body sections (several centimeters), to individual organs (several millimeters), down to high spatial resolution imaging of selected tissue areas (hundreds of micrometers) at 10-μm lateral resolution and below. For all of these dimension ranges, technological considerations and practical aspects are discussed. In light of the imaging MS results, we also address issues faced for compound identification by tandem MS analysis performed directly on the sections. Finally, we discuss under “Perspective” our vision of the future of the field as well as the technological improvements and analytical tools that need to be improved upon and developed.     

Quantitative Proteome Analysis of Temporally Resolved Phagosomes Following Uptake Via Key Phagocytic Receptors

Macrophages operate at the forefront of innate immunity and their discrimination of foreign versus “self” particles is critical for a number of responses including efficient pathogen killing, antigen presentation, and cytokine induction. In order to efficiently destroy the particles and detect potential threats, macrophages express an array of receptors to sense and phagocytose prey particles. In this study, we accurately quantified a proteomic time-course of isolated phagosomes from murine bone marrow-derived macrophages induced by particles conjugated to seven different ligands representing pathogen-associated molecular patterns, immune opsonins or apoptotic cell markers. We identified a clear functional differentiation over the three timepoints and detected subtle differences between certain ligand-phagosomes, indicating that triggering of receptors through a single ligand type has mild, but distinct, effects on phagosome proteome and function. Moreover, our data shows that uptake of phosphatidylserine-coated beads induces an active repression of NF-κB immune responses upon Toll-like receptor (TLR)-activation by recruitment of anti-inflammatory regulators to the phagosome. This data shows for the first time a systematic time-course analysis of bone marrow-derived macrophages phagosomes and how phagosome fate is regulated by the receptors triggered for phagocytosis.Macrophages exist in many different tissue subsets, are extremely plastic in response to cytokines and pathogen-associated molecular patterns and perform a wide range of biological functions (1, 2). One of the most important functions of macrophages is phagocytosis, defined as the active uptake of large particles (>0.5 μm) by cells (3). Phagocytosis is an important cellular mechanism for almost all eukaryotes, highly conserved in evolution (4), and, in mammals, is a key part of the innate immune response to invading microorganisms. Moreover, during homeostasis and development, macrophages phagocytose apoptotic cells and cell debris to recycle cellular building blocks (5, 6). Phagocytosis is induced through the binding of particles as diverse as microbes, apoptotic cells, or even inert beads to cell surface receptors. After internalization, newly formed phagosomes engage in a maturation process that involves fusion with various organelles, including endosomes and ultimately lysosomes (7, 8). This leads to the formation of phagolysosomes that degrade the foreign matter. Antigens from the particle are presented via MHC class I and II molecules, bridging innate and adaptive immunity.In order to effectively phagocytose the diverse types of particulates they can encounter, macrophages express a vast array of receptors to sense and respond to the different ligands; however, only a small subset are solely sufficient to trigger phagocytosis (9). The classic phagocytic receptors are the Fc receptor, which internalizes immunoglobulin-bound particles (10), and the complement receptors, which binds to complement-opsonized particles (11). Other well characterized ligands for phagocytic receptors include mannan, a polysaccharide common in bacterial membranes and fungal cell walls (12), that activates mannose receptors (13, 14); lipopolysaccharide (LPS)¹, a glycolipid that constitutes the major portion of the outermost membrane of Gram-negative bacteria, that triggers CD14 as well as scavenger receptors and toll-like receptors (15–20); and phosphatidylserine (PS), a lipid normally restricted to the inner leaflet of eukaryotic plasma membranes, but exposed in the outer leaflet during apoptosis. PS provides an “eat me” signal for macrophage clearance (21, 22) and triggers a range of receptors including TIM-4, BAI1, and Stabilin-2 (23–27). Similarly, calreticulin, an endoplasmic reticulum protein that is also transported to the plasma membrane serves as a apoptotic signal has been proposed as a phagocytic ligand triggering the phagocytic receptor low-density lipoprotein receptor-related protein (LRP) (28–30).Although it is established that phagosome function is affected by various activation states, including rate of maturation, degradative capacity, and antigen cross-presentation capabilities (31–33), controversy exists around whether phagosome activity can be controlled directly, without prior activation, by receptor engagement at the phagosome level during biogenesis (34–38). Here, we dissect the role that individual ligands play in controlling downstream phagosome maturation using a reductionist strategy of ligating single ligands to microparticles and analyzing resulting phagosomes by quantitative proteomics and fluorescent phagosome functional assays.     

Proinsulin and the Genetics of Diabetes Mellitus

Insulin plays a central role in the regulation of vertebrate metabolism. The hormone, the post-translational product of a single-chain precursor, is a globular protein containing two chains, A (21 residues) and B (30 residues). Recent advances in human genetics have identified dominant mutations in the insulin gene causing permanent neonatal-onset DM² (1–4). The mutations are predicted to block folding of the precursor in the ER of pancreatic β-cells. Although expression of the wild-type allele would in other circumstances be sufficient to maintain homeostasis, studies of a corresponding mouse model (5–7) suggest that the misfolded variant perturbs wild-type biosynthesis (8, 9). Impaired β-cell secretion is associated with ER stress, distorted organelle architecture, and cell death (10). These findings have renewed interest in insulin biosynthesis (11–13) and the structural basis of disulfide pairing (14–19). Protein evolution is constrained not only by structure and function but also by susceptibility to toxic misfolding.Insulin plays a central role in the regulation of vertebrate metabolism. The hormone, the post-translational product of a single-chain precursor, is a globular protein containing two chains, A (21 residues) and B (30 residues). Recent advances in human genetics have identified dominant mutations in the insulin gene causing permanent neonatal-onset DM² (1–4). The mutations are predicted to block folding of the precursor in the ER of pancreatic β-cells. Although expression of the wild-type allele would in other circumstances be sufficient to maintain homeostasis, studies of a corresponding mouse model (5–7) suggest that the misfolded variant perturbs wild-type biosynthesis (8, 9). Impaired β-cell secretion is associated with ER stress, distorted organelle architecture, and cell death (10). These findings have renewed interest in insulin biosynthesis (11–13) and the structural basis of disulfide pairing (14–19). Protein evolution is constrained not only by structure and function but also by susceptibility to toxic misfolding.     

Coomassie Blue as a Near-infrared Fluorescent Stain: A Systematic Comparison With Sypro Ruby for In-gel Protein Detection

Quantitative proteome analyses suggest that the well-established stain colloidal Coomassie Blue, when used as an infrared dye, may provide sensitive, post-electrophoretic in-gel protein detection that can rival even Sypro Ruby. Considering the central role of two-dimensional gel electrophoresis in top-down proteomic analyses, a more cost effective alternative such as Coomassie Blue could prove an important tool in ongoing refinements of this important analytical technique. To date, no systematic characterization of Coomassie Blue infrared fluorescence detection relative to detection with SR has been reported. Here, seven commercial Coomassie stain reagents and seven stain formulations described in the literature were systematically compared. The selectivity, threshold sensitivity, inter-protein variability, and linear-dynamic range of Coomassie Blue infrared fluorescence detection were assessed in parallel with Sypro Ruby. Notably, several of the Coomassie stain formulations provided infrared fluorescence detection sensitivity to <1 ng of protein in-gel, slightly exceeding the performance of Sypro Ruby. The linear dynamic range of Coomassie Blue infrared fluorescence detection was found to significantly exceed that of Sypro Ruby. However, in two-dimensional gel analyses, because of a blunted fluorescence response, Sypro Ruby was able to detect a few additional protein spots, amounting to 0.6% of the detected proteome. Thus, although both detection methods have their advantages and disadvantages, differences between the two appear to be small. Coomassie Blue infrared fluorescence detection is thus a viable alternative for gel-based proteomics, offering detection comparable to Sypro Ruby, and more reliable quantitative assessments, but at a fraction of the cost.Gel electrophoresis is an accessible, widely applicable and mature protein resolving technology. As the original top-down approach to proteomic analyses, among its many attributes the high resolution achievable by two dimensional gel-electrophoresis (2DE)¹ ensures that it remains an effective analytical technology despite the appearance of alternatives. However, in-gel detection remains a limiting factor for gel-based analyses; available technology generally permits the detection and quantification of only relatively abundant proteins (35). Many critical components in normal physiology and also disease may be several orders of magnitude less abundant and thus below the detection threshold of in-gel stains, or indeed most techniques. Pre- and post-fractionation technologies have been developed to address this central issue in proteomics but these are not without limitations (1–5). Thus improved detection methods for gel-based proteomics continue to be a high priority, and the literature is rich with different in-gel detection methods and innovative improvements (6–34). This history of iterative refinement presents a wealth of choices when selecting a detection strategy for a gel-based proteomic analysis (35).Perhaps the best known in-gel detection method is the ubiquitous Coomassie Blue (CB) stain; CB has served as a gel stain and protein quantification reagent for over 40 years. Though affordable, robust, easy to use, and compatible with mass spectrometry (MS), CB staining is relatively insensitive. In traditional organic solvent formulations, CB detects ∼ 10 ng of protein in-gel, and some reports suggest poorer sensitivity (27, 29, 36, 37). Sensitivity is hampered by relatively high background staining because of nonspecific retention of dye within the gel matrix (32, 36, 38, 39). The development of colloidal CB (CCB) formulations largely addressed these limitations (12); the concentration of soluble CB was carefully controlled by sequestering the majority of the dye into colloidal particles, mediated by pH, solvent, and the ionic strength of the solution. Minimizing soluble dye concentration and penetration of the gel matrix mitigated background staining, and the introduction of phosphoric acid into the staining reagent enhanced dye-protein interactions (8, 12, 40), contributing to an in-gel staining sensitivity of 5–10 ng protein, with some formulations reportedly yielding sensitivities of 0.1–1 ng (8, 12, 22, 39, 41, 42). Thus CCB achieved higher sensitivity than traditional CB staining, yet maintained all the advantages of the latter, including low cost and compatibility with existing densitometric detection instruments and MS. Although surpassed by newer methods, the practical advantages of CCB ensure that it remains one of the most common gel stains in use.Fluorescent stains have become the routine and sensitive alternative to visible dyes. Among these, the ruthenium-organometallic family of dyes have been widely applied and the most commercially well-known is Sypro Ruby (SR), which is purported to interact noncovalently with primary amines in proteins (15, 18, 19, 43). Chief among the attributes of these dyes is their high sensitivity. In-gel detection limits of < 1 ng for some proteins have been reported for SR (6, 9, 14, 44, 45). Moreover, SR staining has been reported to yield a greater linear dynamic range (LDR), and reduced interprotein variability (IPV) compared with CCB and silver stains (15, 19, 46–49). SR is easy to use, fully MS compatible, and relatively forgiving of variations in initial conditions (6, 15). The chief consequence of these advances remains high cost; SR and related stains are notoriously expensive, and beyond the budget of many laboratories. Furthermore, despite some small cost advantage relative to SR, none of the available alternatives has been consistently and quantitatively demonstrated to substantially improve on the performance of SR under practical conditions (9, 50).Notably, there is evidence to suggest that CCB staining is not fundamentally insensitive, but rather that its sensitivity has been limited by traditional densitometric detection (50, 51). When excited in the near IR at ∼650 nm, protein-bound CB in-gel emits light in the range of 700–800 nm. Until recently, the lack of low-cost, widely available and sufficiently sensitive infrared (IR)-capable imaging instruments prevented mainstream adoption of in-gel CB infrared fluorescence detection (IRFD); advances in imaging technology are now making such instruments far more accessible. Initial reports suggested that IRFD of CB-stained gels provided greater sensitivity than traditional densitometric detection (50, 51). Using CB R250, in-gel IRFD was reported to detect as little as 2 ng of protein in-gel, with a LDR of about an order of magnitude (2 to 20 ng, or 10 to 100 ng in separate gels), beyond which the fluorescent response saturated into the μg range (51). Using the G250 dye variant, it was determined that CB-IRFD of 2D gels detected ∼3 times as many proteins as densitometric imaging, and a comparable number of proteins as seen by SR (50). This study also concluded that CB-IRFD yielded a significantly higher signal to background ratio (S/BG) than SR, providing initial evidence that CB-IRFD may be superior to SR in some aspects of stain performance (50).Despite this initial evidence of the viability of CB-IRF as an in-gel protein detection method, a detailed characterization of this technology has not yet been reported. Here a more thorough, quantitative characterization of CB-IRFD is described, establishing its lowest limit of detection (LLD), IPV, and LDR in comparison to SR. Finally a wealth of modifications and enhancements of CCB formulations have been reported (8, 12, 21, 24, 26, 29, 40, 41, 52–54), and likewise there are many commercially available CCB stain formulations. To date, none of these formulations have been compared quantitatively in terms of their relative performance when detected using IRF. As a general detection method for gel-based proteomics, CB-IRFD was found to provide comparable or even slightly superior performance to SR according to most criteria, including sensitivity and selectivity (50). Furthermore, in terms of LDR, CB-IRFD showed distinct advantages over SR. However, assessing proteomes resolved by 2DE revealed critical distinctions between CB-IRFD and SR in terms of protein quantification versus threshold detection: neither stain could be considered unequivocally superior to the other by all criteria. Nonetheless, IRFD proved the most sensitive method of detecting CB-stained protein in-gel, enabling high sensitivity detection without the need for expensive reagents or even commercial formulations. Overall, CB-IRFD is a viable alternative to SR and other mainstream fluorescent stains, mitigating the high cost of large-scale gel-based proteomic analyses, making high sensitivity gel-based proteomics accessible to all labs. With improvements to CB formulations and/or image acquisition instruments, the performance of this detection technology may be further enhanced.     

A Double-Barrel Liquid Chromatography-Tandem Mass Spectrometry (LC-MS/MS) System to Quantify 96 Interactomes per Day

The field of proteomics has evolved hand-in-hand with technological advances in LC-MS/MS systems, now enabling the analysis of very deep proteomes in a reasonable time. However, most applications do not deal with full cell or tissue proteomes but rather with restricted subproteomes relevant for the research context at hand or resulting from extensive fractionation. At the same time, investigation of many conditions or perturbations puts a strain on measurement capacity. Here, we develop a high-throughput workflow capable of dealing with large numbers of low or medium complexity samples and specifically aim at the analysis of 96-well plates in a single day (15 min per sample). We combine parallel sample processing with a modified liquid chromatography platform driving two analytical columns in tandem, which are coupled to a quadrupole Orbitrap mass spectrometer (Q Exactive HF). The modified LC platform eliminates idle time between measurements, and the high sequencing speed of the Q Exactive HF reduces required measurement time. We apply the pipeline to the yeast chromatin remodeling landscape and demonstrate quantification of 96 pull-downs of chromatin complexes in about 1 day. This is achieved with only 500 μg input material, enabling yeast cultivation in a 96-well format. Our system retrieved known complex-members and the high throughput allowed probing with many bait proteins. Even alternative complex compositions were detectable in these very short gradients. Thus, sample throughput, sensitivity and LC/MS-MS duty cycle are improved severalfold compared with established workflows. The pipeline can be extended to different types of interaction studies and to other medium complexity proteomes.Shotgun proteomics is concerned with the identification and quantification of proteins (1–3). Prior to analysis, the proteins are digested into peptides, resulting in highly complex mixtures. To deal with this complexity, the peptides are separated by liquid chromatography followed by online analysis with mass spectrometry (MS), today facilitating the characterization of almost complete cell line proteomes in a short time (3–5). In addition to the characterization of entire proteomes, there is also a great demand for analyzing low or medium complexity samples. Given the trend toward a systems biology view, relatively larges sets of samples often have to be measured. One such category of lower complexity protein mixtures occurs in the determination of physical interaction partners of a protein of interest, which requires the identification and quantification of the proteins “pulled-down” or immunoprecipitated via a bait protein. Protein interactions are essential for almost all biological processes and orchestrate a cell''s behavior by regulating enzymes, forming macromolecular assemblies and functionalizing multiprotein complexes that are capable of more complex behavior than the sum of their parts. The human genome has almost 20,000 protein encoding genes, and it has been estimated that 80% of the proteins engage in complex interactions and that 130,000 to 650,000 protein interactions can take place in a human cell (6, 7). These numbers demonstrate a clear need for systematic and high-throughput mapping of protein–protein interactions (PPIs) to understand these complexes.The introduction of generic methods to detect PPIs, such as the yeast two-hybrid screen (Y2H) (8) or affinity purification combined with mass spectrometry (AP-MS)¹ (9), have revolutionized the protein interactomics field. AP-MS in particular has emerged as an important tool to catalogue interactions with the aim of better understanding basic biochemical mechanisms in many different organisms (10–17). It can be performed under near-physiological conditions and is capable of identifying functional protein complexes (18). In addition, the combination of affinity purification with quantitative mass spectrometry has greatly improved the discrimination of true interactors from unspecific background binders, a long-standing challenge in the AP-MS field (19–21). Nowadays, quantitative AP-MS is employed to address many different biological questions, such as detection of dynamic changes in PPIs upon perturbation (22–25) or the impact of posttranslational signaling on PPIs (26, 27). Recent developments even make it possible to provide abundances and stoichiometry information of the bait and prey proteins under study, combined with quantitative data from very deep cellular proteomes. Furthermore, sample preparation in AP-MS can now be performed in high-throughput formats capable of producing hundreds of samples per day. With such throughput in sample generation, the LC-MS/MS part of the AP-MS pipeline has become a major bottleneck for large studies, limiting throughput to a small fraction of the available samples. In principle, this limitation could be circumvented by multiplexing analysis via isotope-labeling strategies (28, 29) or by drastically reducing the measurement time per sample (30–32). The former strategy requires exquisite control of the processing steps and has not been widely implemented yet. The latter strategy depends on mass spectrometers with sufficiently high sequencing speed to deal with the pull-down in a very short time. Since its introduction about 10 years ago (33), the Orbitrap mass spectrometer has featured ever-faster sequencing capabilities, with the Q Exactive HF now reaching a peptide sequencing speed of up to 17 Hz (34). This should now make it feasible to substantially lower the amount of time spent per measurement.Although very short LC-MS/MS runs can in principle be used for high-throughput analyses, they usually lead to a drop in LC-MS duty cycle. This is because each sample needs initial washing, loading, and equilibration steps, independent of gradient time, which takes a substantial percentage for most LC setups - typically at least 15–20 min. To achieve a more efficient LC-MS duty cycle, while maintaining high sensitivity, a second analytical column can be introduced. This enables the parallelization of several steps related to sample loading and to the LC operating steps, including valve switching. Such dual analytical column or “double-barrel: setups have been described for various applications and platforms (30, 35–39).Starting from the reported performance and throughput of workflows that are standard today (16, 21, 40–42), we asked if it would be possible to obtain a severalfold increase in both sample throughput and sensitivity, as well as a considerable reduction in overall wet lab costs and working time. Specifically, our goal was to quantify 96 medium complexity samples in a single day. Such a number of samples can be processed with a 96-well plate, which currently is the format of choice for highly parallelized sample preparation workflows, often with a high degree of automation. We investigated which advances were needed in sample preparation, liquid chromatography, and mass spectrometry. Based on our findings, we developed a parallelized platform for high-throughput sample preparation and LC-MS/MS analysis, which we applied to pull-down samples from the yeast chromatin remodeling landscape. The extent of retrieval of known complex members served as a quality control of the developed pipeline.