The Saccharomyces cerevisiae high mobility group box protein HMO1 contains two functional DNA binding domains

High mobility group box (HMGB) proteins are architectural proteins whose HMG DNA binding domains confer significant preference for distorted DNA, such as 4-way junctions. HMO1 is one of 10 Saccharomyces cerevisiae HMGB proteins, and it is required for normal growth and plasmid maintenance and for regulating the susceptibility of yeast chromatin to nuclease. Using electrophoretic mobility shift assays, we have shown here that HMO1 binds 26-bp duplex DNA with K(d) = 39.6 +/- 5.0 nm and that its divergent box A domain participates in DNA interactions, albeit with low affinity. HMO1 has only modest preference for DNA with altered conformations, including DNA with nicks, gaps, overhangs, or loops, as well as for 4-way junction structures and supercoiled DNA. HMO1 binds 4-way junctions with half-maximal saturation of 19.6 +/- 2.2 nm, with only a modest increase in affinity in the absence of magnesium ions (half-maximal saturation 6.1 +/- 1.1 nm). Whereas the box A domain contributes modest structure-specific binding, the box B domain is required for high affinity binding. HMO1 bends DNA, as measured by DNA cyclization assays, facilitating cyclization of 136-, 105-, and 87-bp DNA, but not 75-bp DNA, and it has a significantly longer residence time on DNA minicircles compared with linear duplex DNA. The unique DNA binding properties of HMO1 are consistent with global roles in the maintenance of chromatin structure.     

HMGB binding to DNA: single and double box motifs

High mobility group (HMG) proteins are nuclear proteins believed to significantly affect DNA interactions by altering nucleic acid flexibility. Group B (HMGB) proteins contain HMG box domains known to bind to the DNA minor groove without sequence specificity, slightly intercalating base pairs and inducing a strong bend in the DNA helical axis. A dual-beam optical tweezers system is used to extend double-stranded DNA (dsDNA) in the absence as well as presence of a single box derivative of human HMGB2 [HMGB2(box A)] and a double box derivative of rat HMGB1 [HMGB1(box A+box B)]. The single box domain is observed to reduce the persistence length of the double helix, generating sharp DNA bends with an average bending angle of 99 ± 9° and, at very high concentrations, stabilizing dsDNA against denaturation. The double box protein contains two consecutive HMG box domains joined by a flexible tether. This protein also reduces the DNA persistence length, induces an average bending angle of 77 ± 7°, and stabilizes dsDNA at significantly lower concentrations. These results suggest that single and double box proteins increase DNA flexibility and stability, albeit both effects are achieved at much lower protein concentrations for the double box. In addition, at low concentrations, the single box protein can alter DNA flexibility without stabilizing dsDNA, whereas stabilization at higher concentrations is likely achieved through a cooperative binding mode.     

Yeast high mobility group protein HMO1 stabilizes chromatin and is evicted during repair of DNA double strand breaks

DNA is packaged into condensed chromatin fibers by association with histones and architectural proteins such as high mobility group (HMGB) proteins. However, this DNA packaging reduces accessibility of enzymes that act on DNA, such as proteins that process DNA after double strand breaks (DSBs). Chromatin remodeling overcomes this barrier. We show here that the Saccharomyces cerevisiae HMGB protein HMO1 stabilizes chromatin as evidenced by faster chromatin remodeling in its absence. HMO1 was evicted along with core histones during repair of DSBs, and chromatin remodeling events such as histone H2A phosphorylation and H3 eviction were faster in absence of HMO1. The facilitated chromatin remodeling in turn correlated with more efficient DNA resection and recruitment of repair proteins; for example, inward translocation of the DNA-end-binding protein Ku was faster in absence of HMO1. This chromatin stabilization requires the lysine-rich C-terminal extension of HMO1 as truncation of the HMO1 C-terminal tail phenocopies hmo1 deletion. Since this is reminiscent of the need for the basic C-terminal domain of mammalian histone H1 in chromatin compaction, we speculate that HMO1 promotes chromatin stability by DNA bending and compaction imposed by its lysine-rich domain and that it must be evicted along with core histones for efficient DSB repair.     

Structure of DNA complexes with chromosomal protein HMGB1 and histone H1 in the presence of manganese ions: 1. Circular dichroism spectroscopy

Mechanisms of interaction of DNA with nonhistone chromosomal protein HMGB1 and linker histone H1 have been studied by means of circular dichroism and absorption spectroscopy. Both proteins are located in the internucleosomal regions of chromatin. It is demonstrated that the properties of DNA-protein complexes depend on the protein content and cannot be considered as a mere summing up of the effects of individual protein components. Interaction of the HMGB1 and H1 proteins is shown with DNA to be cooperative rather than competitive. Lysine-rich histone H1 facilitates the binding of HMGB1 to DNA by screening the negatively charged groups of the sugar-phosphate backbone of DNA and dicarboxylic amino acid residues in the C-terminal domain of HMGB1. The observed joint action of HMGB1 and H1 stimulates DNA condensation with the formation of anisotropic DNA-protein complexes with typical ψ-type CD spectra. Structural organization of the complexes depends not only on DNA-protein interactions but also on interaction between the HMGB1 and H1 protein molecules bound to DNA. Manganese ions significantly modify the mode of interactions between components in the triple DNA-HMGB1-H1 complex. The binding of Mn²⁺ ions weakens DNA-protein interactions and strengthens protein-protein interactions, which promote DNA condensation and formation of large DNA-protein particles in solution.     

Structural Analysis of HMGD-DNA Complexes Reveals Influence of Intercalation on Sequence Selectivity and DNA Bending

The ubiquitous, eukaryotic, high-mobility group box (HMGB) chromosomal proteins promote many chromatin-mediated cellular activities through their non-sequence-specific binding and bending of DNA. Minor-groove DNA binding by the HMG box results in substantial DNA bending toward the major groove owing to electrostatic interactions, shape complementarity, and DNA intercalation that occurs at two sites. Here, the structures of the complexes formed with DNA by a partially DNA intercalation-deficient mutant of Drosophila melanogaster HMGD have been determined by X-ray crystallography at a resolution of 2.85 Å. The six proteins and 50 bp of DNA in the crystal structure revealed a variety of bound conformations. All of the proteins bound in the minor groove, bridging DNA molecules, presumably because these DNA regions are easily deformed. The loss of the primary site of DNA intercalation decreased overall DNA bending and shape complementarity. However, DNA bending at the secondary site of intercalation was retained and most protein-DNA contacts were preserved. The mode of binding resembles the HMGB1 box A-cisplatin-DNA complex, which also lacks a primary intercalating residue. This study provides new insights into the binding mechanisms used by HMG boxes to recognize varied DNA structures and sequences as well as modulate DNA structure and DNA bending.     

Conformational properties of nuclear protein HMGB1 and specificity of its interaction with DNA

Changes in secondary structure of DNA and non-histone chromosomal protein HMGB1 during the formation of the complex have been studied by circular dichroism and UV spectroscopy. It was demonstrated that the HMGB1 protein is able to change its secondary structure upon binding to DNA. Based on the assumption that there are two spectroscopically distinguishable forms of the HMGB1 in solution, we estimated the fraction of bound protein. The fraction of bound protein decreases at higher protein to DNA ratios r from 0.48 at r = 0.13 to 0.06 at r = 2.43. It was shown that HMGB1 is able to induce considerable changes in DNA structure, even when the amount of protein actually bound is low.     

123 Mini-chromosome maintenance complexes form a filament to remodel DNA structure and topology

Deregulation of mini-chromosome maintenance (MCM) proteins are associated with genomic instability and cellular abnormality. MCM complexes are recruited to replication origins for S phase genome duplication. Paradoxically, MCM proteins are expressed in large number of origins and are associated with unreplicated chromatin regions away from the origins during G1 and S phases. We report an unusually wide left-handed filament structure for an archeal MCM, as determined by X-ray and electron microscopy. The crystal structure reveals that an α-helix bundle formed between two neighboring subunits plays a critical role in filament formation which we show through mutation and electron microscopy. The filament interior has a remarkably strong electro-positive surface spiraling along the inner filament channel which we establish as the binding site for double-stranded DNA. We find that MCM filament binding to DNA causes dramatic topological changes which negatively supercoil circular DNA through inducing loosening of the double helix. This newly identified biochemical activity of MCM may imply a wider functional role for MCM in DNA metabolism beyond helicase function, for the non-origin bound MCMs. Finally, using yeast genetics, we show that the inter–subunit interactions important for MCM filament formation play a role for cell growth and survival.     

Determinants of HMGB proteins required to promote RAG1/2-recombination signal sequence complex assembly and catalysis during V(D)J recombination

Efficient assembly of RAG1/2-recombination signal sequence (RSS) DNA complexes that are competent for V(D)J cleavage requires the presence of the nonspecific DNA binding and bending protein HMGB1 or HMGB2. We find that either of the two minimal DNA binding domains of HMGB1 is effective in assembling RAG1/2-RSS complexes on naked DNA and stimulating V(D)J cleavage but that both domains are required for efficient activity when the RSS is incorporated into a nucleosome. The single-domain HMGB protein from Saccharomyces cerevisiae, Nhp6A, efficiently assembles RAG1/2 complexes on naked DNA; however, these complexes are minimally competent for V(D)J cleavage. Nhp6A forms much more stable DNA complexes than HMGB1, and a variety of mutations that destabilize Nhp6A binding to bent microcircular DNA promote increased V(D)J cleavage. One of the two DNA bending wedges on Nhp6A and the analogous phenylalanine wedge at the DNA exit site of HMGB1 domain A were found to be essential for promoting RAG1/2-RSS complex formation. Because the phenylalanine wedge is required for specific recognition of DNA kinks, we propose that HMGB proteins facilitate RAG1/2-RSS interactions by recognizing a distorted DNA structure induced by RAG1/2 binding. The resulting complex must be sufficiently dynamic to enable the series of RAG1/2-mediated chemical reactions on the DNA.     

Role of the Acidic Tail of High Mobility Group Protein B1 (HMGB1) in Protein Stability and DNA Bending

High mobility group box (HMGB) proteins are abundant nonhistone proteins found in all eukaryotic nuclei and are capable of binding/bending DNA. The human HMGB1 is composed of two binding motifs, known as Boxes A and B, are L-shaped alpha-helix structures, followed by a random-coil acidic tail that consists of 30 Asp and Glu residues. This work aimed at evaluating the role of the acidic tail of human HMGB1 in protein stability and DNA interactions. For this purpose, we cloned, expressed and purified HMGB1 and its tailless form, HMGB1ΔC, in E. coli strain. Tryptophan fluorescence spectroscopy and circular dichroism (CD) experiments clearly showed an increase in protein stability promoted by the acidic tail under different conditions, such as the presence of the chemical denaturant guanidine hydrochloride (Gdn.HCl), high temperature and low pH. Folding intermediates found at low pH for both proteins were denatured only in the presence of chemical denaturant, thus showing a relatively high stability. The acidic tail did not alter the DNA-binding properties of the protein, although it enhanced the DNA bending capability from 76° (HMGB1ΔC) to 91° (HMGB1), as measured using the fluorescence resonance energy transfer technique. A model of DNA bending in vivo was proposed, which might help to explain the interaction of HMGB1 with DNA and other proteins, i.e., histones, and the role of that protein in chromatin remodeling.     

Cooperative recruitment of HMGB1 during V(D)J recombination through interactions with RAG1 and DNA

During V(D)J recombination, recombination activating gene (RAG)1 and RAG2 bind and cleave recombination signal sequences (RSSs), aided by the ubiquitous DNA-binding/-bending proteins high-mobility group box protein (HMGB)1 or HMGB2. HMGB1/2 play a critical, although poorly understood, role in vitro in the assembly of functional RAG–RSS complexes, into which HMGB1/2 stably incorporate. The mechanism of HMGB1/2 recruitment is unknown, although an interaction with RAG1 has been suggested. Here, we report data demonstrating only a weak HMGB1–RAG1 interaction in the absence of DNA in several assays, including fluorescence anisotropy experiments using a novel Alexa488-labeled HMGB1 protein. Addition of DNA to RAG1 and HMGB1 in fluorescence anisotropy experiments, however, results in a substantial increase in complex formation, indicating a synergistic binding effect. Pulldown experiments confirmed these results, as HMGB1 was recruited to a RAG1–DNA complex in a RAG1 concentration-dependent manner and, interestingly, without strict RSS sequence specificity. Our finding that HMGB1 binds more tightly to a RAG1–DNA complex over RAG1 or DNA alone provides an explanation for the stable integration of this typically transient architectural protein in the V(D)J recombinase complex throughout recombination. These findings also have implications for the order of events during RAG–DNA complex assembly and for the stabilization of sequence-specific and non-specific RAG1–DNA interactions.     

Concentration-dependent exchange accelerates turnover of proteins bound to double-stranded DNA

The multistep kinetics through which DNA-binding proteins bind their targets are heavily studied, but relatively little attention has been paid to proteins leaving the double helix. Using single-DNA stretching and fluorescence detection, we find that sequence-neutral DNA-binding proteins Fis, HU and NHP6A readily exchange with themselves and with each other. In experiments focused on the Escherichia coli nucleoid-associated protein Fis, only a small fraction of protein bound to DNA spontaneously dissociates into protein-free solution. However, if Fis is present in solution, we find that a concentration-dependent exchange reaction occurs which turns over the bound protein, with a rate of k_exch = 6 × 10⁴ M⁻¹s⁻¹. The bacterial DNA-binding protein HU and the yeast HMGB protein NHP6A display the same phenomenon of protein in solution accelerating dissociation of previously bound labeled proteins as exchange occurs. Thus, solvated proteins can play a key role in facilitating removal and renewal of proteins bound to the double helix, an effect that likely plays a major role in promoting the turnover of proteins bound to DNA in vivo and, therefore, in controlling the dynamics of gene regulation.     

HMGB1 interacts with XPA to facilitate the processing of DNA interstrand crosslinks in human cells

Many effective agents used in cancer chemotherapy cause DNA interstrand crosslinks (ICLs), which covalently link both strands of the double helix together resulting in cytotoxicity. ICLs are thought to be processed by proteins from a variety of DNA repair pathways; however, a clear understanding of ICL recognition and repair processing in human cells is lacking. Previously, we found that the high mobility group box 1 (HMGB1) protein bound to triplex-directed psoralen ICLs (TFO-ICLs) in vitro, cooperatively with NER damage recognition proteins, promoted removal of UVC-induced lesions and facilitated error-free repair of TFO-ICLs in mouse fibroblasts. Here, we demonstrate that HMGB1 recognizes TFO-ICLs in human cells, and its depletion increases ICL-induced mutagenesis in human cells without altering the mutation spectra. In contrast, HMGB1 depletion in XPA-deficient human cells significantly altered the ICL-induced mutation spectrum from predominantly T→A to T→G transversions. Moreover, the recruitment of XPA and HMGB1 to the ICLs is co-dependent. Finally, we show that HMGB1 specifically introduces negative supercoils in ICL-containing plasmids in HeLa cell extracts. Taken together, our data suggest that in human cells, HMGB1 functions in association with XPA on ICLs and facilitates the formation of a favorable architectural environment for ICL repair processing.     

The structure of the complexes of DNA with chromosomal protein HMGB1 and histone H1 in the presence of manganese ions. I. Circular dicroism spectroscopy

The mechanisms of interaction of the non-histone chromosomal protein HMGB1 and linker histone H1 with DNA have been studied using circular dichroism and absorption spectroscopy. Both of the proteins are located in the inter-nucleosomal regions of chromatin. It was demonstrated that properties of the DNA-protein complexes depend on the protein content and can not be considered as a simple summing up of the effects of individual protein components. Interaction of HMGB1 and H1 proteins is shown to be co-operative rather than competitive. Lysine-rich histone H1 facilitates the binding of the HMGB1 with DNA by screening the negatively charged groups of the sugar-phosphate backbone of DNA and dicarboxylic amino-acid residues in the C-terminal domain of the HMGB1 protein. The observed joint action of the and H1 proteins stimulates DNA condensation with formation of the anisotropic DNA-protein complexes with typical psi-type CD spectra. Structural organization of the complexes depends not only on the DNA-protein interactions, but also on the interaction between HMGB1 and H1 protein molecules bound to DNA. Manganese ions significantly modify the character of interactions between the components in the triple DNA-HMGB1-H1 complex. Binding of Mn2+ ions causes the weakening of the DNA-protein interactions and strengthening the protein-protein interactions, which promote DNA condensation and formation of large DNA-protein particles in solution.     

The yeast high mobility group protein HMO2, a subunit of the chromatin-remodeling complex INO80, binds DNA ends

DNA damage is a common hazard that all cells have to combat. Saccharomyces cerevisiae HMO2 is a high mobility group protein (HMGB) that is a component of the chromatin-remodeling complex INO80, which is involved in double strand break (DSB) repair. We show here using DNA end-joining and exonuclease protection assays that HMO2 binds preferentially to DNA ends. While HMO2 binds DNA with both blunt and cohesive ends, the sequence of a single stranded overhang significantly affects binding, supporting the conclusion that HMO2 recognizes features at DNA ends. Analysis of the effect of duplex length on the ability of HMO2 to protect DNA from exonucleolytic cleavage suggests that more than one HMO2 must assemble at each DNA end. HMO2 binds supercoiled DNA with higher affinity than linear DNA and has a preference for DNA with lesions such as pairs of tandem mismatches; however, comparison of DNA constructs of increasing length suggests that HMO2 may not bind stably as a monomer to distorted DNA. The remarkable ability of HMO2 to protect DNA from exonucleolytic cleavage, combined with reports that HMO2 arrives early at DNA DSBs, suggests that HMO2 may play a role in DSB repair beyond INO80 recruitment.     

Structure of DNA Complexes with Nonhistone Chromosomal Protein HMGB1 in the Presence of Manganese Ions

The complexes of DNA–HMGB1 protein–manganese ions have been studied using the circular dichroism (CD) technique. It was shown that the interactions of both the protein and metal ions with DNA in this three-component system differ from those in two-component complexes. The manganese ions did not affect the CD spectrum of the free HMGB1 protein. However, Mn²⁺ ions induced considerable changes in the CD spectrum of free DNA in the spectral range of 260–290 nm. The presence of Mn²⁺ ions prevented the formation of the ordered supramolecular structures typical of HMGB1–DNA complexes. The interaction of manganese ions with DNA had a marked influence on the local DNA structure, changing the properties of protein-binding sites and resulting in a marked decrease in cooperativity of HMGB1–DNA binding. Such changes in the mode of protein–DNA interactions occurred at concentrations as small as 0.01 mM Mn²⁺. Moreover, the changes in local DNA structure induced by the manganese ions promoted the appearance of new HMGB1 binding sites in the DNA double helix. At the same time, interactions with the HMGB1 protein induced alterations in the structure of the DNA double helix, which increased with an increase in the protein-to-DNA ratio. These alterations made the DNA–protein complex especially sensitive to manganese ions. Under these conditions the Mn²⁺ ions strongly affected the DNA structure, which was reflected in abrupt changes in the CD spectra of DNA in the complex in the range of 260–290 nm. Thus, structural changes in the DNA double helix in three-component DNA–HMGB1–Mn²⁺ complexes result from the combined and interdependent interactions of DNA with Mn²⁺ ions and HMGB1 molecules.     

Fourier transform infrared/vibrational circular dichroism spectroscopy as an informative tool for the investigation of large supramolecular complexes of biological macromolecules

A combination of ultraviolet (UV) and infrared (IR) absorption and circular dichroism (CD) spectroscopy was applied to investigate the structure and formation of large supramolecular DNA-protein complexes. This combination of techniques was used to overcome limitations of UV-CD (electronic, or ECD) spectroscopy due to considerable light scattering in such solutions. Based on the analysis of FTIR and UV-CD spectra, the interaction of DNA with nonhistone chromatin protein HMGB1 and linker histone H1 was studied. The data obtained showed that under the conditions of the experiment (15 mM NaCl, protein/DNA ratio r < 1 w/w) the proteins did not reveal any AT or GC specificity in binding to DNA. In the presence of both proteins, mainly interactions in the DNA minor groove were observed, which were attributed to HMGB1 binding. Histone H1 facilitated binding of HMGB1 to DNA by interacting with the negatively charged groups of the sugar-phosphate backbone and binding of aspartic and glutamic amino acid residues of HMGB1. Acting together, HMGB1 and H1 stimulated the assemblage of supramolecular DNA-protein structures. The structural organization of the ternary complexes depended not only on the properties of the protein-DNA interactions but also on the interactions between HMGB1 and H1 molecules.     

Native HMGB1 protein inhibits repair of cisplatin-damaged nucleosomes in vitro

The high mobility group box (HMGB) 1 protein, one of the most abundant nuclear non-histone proteins has been known for its inhibitory effect on repair of DNA damaged by the antitumor drug cisplatin. Here, we report the first results that link HMGB1 to repair of cisplatin-treated DNA at nucleosome level. Experiments were carried out with three types of reconstituted nucleosomes strongly positioned on the damaged DNA: linker DNA containing nucleosomes (centrally and end-positioned) and core particles. The highest repair synthesis was registered with end-positioned nucleosomes, two and three times more efficient than that with centrally positioned nucleosomes and core particles, respectively. HMGB1 inhibited repair of linker DNA containing nucleosomes more efficiently than that of core particles. Just the opposite was the effect of the in vivo acetylated HMGB1: stronger repair inhibition was obtained with core particles. No inhibition was observed with HMGB1 lacking the acidic tail. Binding of HMGB1 proteins to different nucleosomes was also analysed. HMGB1 bound preferentially to damage nucleosomes containing linker DNA, while the binding of the acetylated protein was linker independent. We show that both the repair of cisplatin-damaged nucleosomes and its inhibition by HMGB1 are nucleosome position-dependent events which are accomplished via the acidic tail and modulated by acetylation.