Modified curved DNA that could allow local DNA underwinding at the nucleosomal pseudodyad fails to position a nucleosome in vivo.

In competitive in vitro reconstitution experiments synthetic DNA composed of tandem repeats of the repetitive sequence (A/T)3NN(G/C)3NN, specifically the 20 bp 'TG sequence' (5'-TCGGTGTTAGAGCCTGTAAC-3'), was reported to associate with the histone octamer with an affinity higher than that of nucleosomally derived DNA. However, at least two groups have independently shown that tandem repeats of the TG sequence do not accommodate a stably positioned nucleosome in vivo. It was suggested that the anisotropic flexibility of the TG sequence, governed by a 10 bp sequence periodicity, is incompatible with the required underwinding of the DNA helix at the nucleosome pseudodyad while maintaining a bending preference that can be accommodated in the remainder of the nucleosome. Here we test this hypothesis directly by studying the in vivo nucleosomal structure of modified TG sequences designed to accommodate underwinding at the pseudodyad. We show that these modifications are not sufficient to allow stable incorporation of the TG sequence repeat into a nucleosome in vivo, but do note invasion from one end of the TG heptamer of a translationally random but rotationally constrained nucleosome. We discuss possible reasons for the absence of nucleosomes from the TG sequence in vivo.     

Structural features of a regulatory nucleosome

DNA sequences from the long terminal repeat of the mouse mammary tumor virus (MMTV-LTR) position nucleosomes both in vivo and in vitro. Here, were present chromatin reconstitution experiments showing that MMTV-LTR sequences from -236 to +204 accommodate two histone octamers in positions compatible with the in vivo data. This positioning is not influenced by the length of the DNA fragment and occurs in linear as well as in closed circular DNA molecules. MMTV-LTR DNA sequences show an intrinsic bendability that closely resembles its wrapping around the histone octamer. We propose that bendability is responsible for the observed rotational nucleosome positioning. Translational nucleosome positioning seems also to be determined by the DNA sequence. These data, along with the results from reconstitution experiments with insertion mutants, support a modular model of nucleosome phasing on MMTV-LTR, where the actual positioning of the histone octamer results from the additive effect of multiple features of the DNA sequence.     

DNA rotational positioning in a regulatory nucleosome is determined by base sequence. An algorithm to model the preferred superhelix.

MMTV-LTR sequences -190/-45 position a histone octamer both in vivo and in vitro. Experimental evidence suggested that nucleosome rotational positioning is determined by the DNA sequence itself. We developed an algorithm that is able to predict the most favorable path of a given DNA sequence over a histone octamer, based on rotational preferences of different dinucleotides. Our analysis shows that these preferences are sufficient for explaining the observed rotational positioning of the MMTV-LTR nucleosome, at one base pair accuracy level. Computer-generated 3-D models of the experimentally calculated and predicted MMTV-LTR nucleosome show that the predicted orientation is fully compatible with the currently available data in terms of accessibility of relevant sequences to regulatory proteins.     

A signal encoded in vertebrate DNA that influences nucleosome positioning and alignment.

Evidence is provided that the nucleotide triplet con-sensus non-T(A/T)G (abbreviated to VWG) influences nucleosome positioning and nucleosome alignment into regular arrays. This triplet consensus has been recently found to exhibit a fairly strong 10 bp periodicity in human DNA, implicating it in anisotropic DNA bendability. It is demonstrated that the experimentally determined preferences for nucleosome positioning in native SV40 chromatin can, to a large extent, be pre-dicted simply by counting the occurrences of the period-10 VWG consensus. Nucleosomes tend to form in regions of the SV40 genome that contain high counts of period-10 VWG and/or avoid regions with low counts. In contrast, periodic occurrences of the dinucleotides AA/TT, implicated in the rotational positioning of DNA in nucleosomes, did not correlate with the preferred nucleosome locations in SV40 chromatin. Periodic occurrences of AA did correlate with preferred nucleosome locations in a region of SV40 DNA where VWG occurrences are low. Regular oscillations in period-10 VWG counts with a dinucleosome period were found in vertebrate DNA regions that aligned nucleosomes into regular arrays in vitro in the presence of linker histone. Escherichia coli and plasmid DNA, which fail to align nucleosomes in vitro, lacked these regular VWG oscillations.     

Formation, stability and core histone positioning of nucleosomes reassembled on bent and other nucleosome-derived DNA

DNA originating from chicken erythrocyte mononucleosomes was cloned and sequenced. The properties of nucleosome reconstruction were compared for two cloned inserts, selected on account of their interesting sequence organization, length and difference in DNA bending. Cloned fragment 223 (182 base-pairs) carries alternatively (A)3-4 and (T)4-5 runs approximately every ten base-pairs and is bent; cloned fragment 213 (182 base-pairs) contains a repeated C4-5ATAAGG consensus sequence and is apparently not bent. Our experiments indicate the preference of the bent DNA fragment 223 over fragment 213 to associate in vitro with an octamer of histones under stringent conditions. We provide evidence that the in vitro nucleosome formation is hampered in the case of fragment 213, whereas the reconstituted nucleosomes were equally stable once formed. For the correct determination of the positioning of the histone octamer with regard to the two nucleosome-derived cloned DNA sequences, the complementary use of micrococcal nuclease, exonuclease III and DNase I is a prerequisite. No unique, but rotationally related, positions of the histone octamer were found on these nucleosome-derived DNA fragments. The sequence-dependent anisotropic flexibility, as well as intrinsic bending of the DNA, resulting in a rotational setting of the DNA fragments on the histone core, seems to be a strong determinant for the allowed octamer positions, Exonuclease III digestion indicates a different histone-DNA association when oligo(d(C.G)n) stretches are involved. The apparent stagger near oligo(d(A.T)n) stretches generated by DNase I digestion on reconstituted nucleosome 223 was found to be inverted from the normal two-base 3' overhang to a two-base 5' overhang. Two possibilities of the oligo(d(A.T)n) minor groove location relative to the histone core are envisaged to explain this anomaly in stagger.     

Unique translational positioning of nucleosomes on synthetic DNAs.

A computational study was previously carried out to analyze DNA sequences that are known to position histone octamers at single translational sites. A conserved pattern of intrinsic DNA curvature was uncovered that was proposed to direct the formation of nucleosomes to unique positions. The pattern consists of two regions of curved DNA separated by preferred lengths of non-curved DNA. In the present study, 11 synthetic DNAs were constructed which contain two regions of curved DNA of the form [(A5.T5)(G/C)5]4 separated by non-curved regions of variable length. Translational mapping experiments of in vitro reconstituted mononucleosomes using exonuclease III, micrococcal nuclease and restriction enzymes demonstrated that two of the fragments positioned nucleosomes at a single site while the remaining fragments positioned octamers at multiple sites spaced at 10 base intervals. The synthetic molecules that positioned nucleosomes at a single site contain non-curved central regions of the same lengths that were seen in natural nucleosome positioning sequences. Hydroxyl radical and DNase I digests of the synthetic DNAs in reconstituted nucleosomes showed that the synthetic curved element on one side of the nucleosomal dyad assumed a rotational orientation where narrow minor grooves of the A-tracts faced the histone surface with all molecules. In contrast, the curved element on the other side of the nucleosome displayed variable rotational orientations between molecules which appeared to be related to the positioning effect. These results suggest that asymmetry between the two halves of nucleosomal DNA may facilitate translational positioning.     

Effects of DNA sequence and histone-histone interactions on nucleosome placement

Using competitive reconstitution, we have refined the parameters for the binding of histone octamers to artificial nucleosome-positioning sequences of the form: (A/T3nn(G/C)3nn. We find that the optimal period between flexible segments is approximately 10.1 base-pairs, supporting the view that the DNA on the nucleosome surface is overwound. The strongest requirement for flexible DNA is near the protein dyad. However, we see no indication of changes in DNA helical repeat in this region. Using a series of repetitive sequences, we confirm that neither all A/T-rich nor all G/C-rich regions are identical in promoting nucleosome formation. Surprisingly, A/T-rich segments containing the TpA step, subject to purine-purine clash in the minor groove, favor nucleosome formation over sequences lacking this step. Short tracts of adenine residues are found to position on the histone surface like other A/T-rich regions, in the manner predicted by the direction of their sequence-directed bends as determined by electrophoretic methods. Tracts containing five adenine residues are extremely aniostropic in their flexibility and are strongly detrimental to nucleosome formation when positioned for major groove compression. Longer adenine tracts are found to position near the ends of the nucleosomal DNA. However, other positions may be occupied by an A12 tract, with only a minor penalty in the free energy of nucleosome formation. Overall, reconstituted nucleosome positions are translationally degenerate, suggesting a weak dependence on DNA flexibility for nucleosome positioning. Dinucleosomal reconstitutions on tandem dimers of the 5 S RNA gene of Lytechinus variegatus demonstrate a weak phasing dependence for the interaction between nucleosomes. This interaction is maximal for the 202 base-pair repeat and suggests a co-operative mechanism for the formation of ordered nucleosomal arrays based on a combination of DNA flexibility and nucleosome-nucleosome interactions.     

Reconstitution experiments show that sequence-specific histone-DNA interactions are the basis for nucleosome phasing on mouse satellite DNA

The molecular basis underlying the sequence-specific positioning of nucleosomes on DNA was investigated. We previously showed that histone octamers occupy multiple specific positions on mouse satellite DNA in vivo and have now reconstituted the 234 bp mouse satellite repeat unit with pure core histones into mononucleosomes. Histones from mouse liver or chicken erythrocytes bind to the DNA in multiple precisely defined frames in perfect phase with a diverged 9 bp subrepeat of the satellite DNA. This is the first time that nucleosome positions on a DNA in vivo have been compared to those found on the same DNA by in vitro reconstitution. Most of the nucleosomes occupy identical positions in vivo and in vitro. There are, however, some characteristic differences. We conclude that sequence-dependent histone-DNA interactions play a decisive role in the positioning of nucleosomes in vivo, but that the nucleosome locations in native chromatin are subject to additional constraints.     

The core histone tail domains contribute to sequence-dependent nucleosome positioning

The precise positioning of nucleosomes plays a critical role in the regulation of gene expression by modulating the DNA binding activity of trans-acting factors. However, molecular determinants responsible for positioning are not well understood. We examined whether the removal of the core histone tail domains from nucleosomes reconstituted with specific DNA fragments led to alteration of translational positions. Remarkably, we find that removal of tail domains from a nucleosome assembled on a DNA fragment containing a Xenopus borealis somatic-type 5S RNA gene results in repositioning of nucleosomes along the DNA, including two related major translational positions that move about 20 bp further upstream with respect to the 5S gene. In a nucleosome reconstituted with a DNA fragment containing the promoter of a Drosophila alcohol dehydrogenase gene, several translational positions shifted by about 10 bp along the DNA upon tail removal. However, the positions of nucleosomes assembled with a DNA fragment known to have one of the highest binding affinities for core histone proteins in the mouse genome were not altered by removal of core histone tail domains. Our data support the notion that the basic tail domains bind to nucleosomal DNA and influence the selection of the translational position of nucleosomes and that once tails are removed movement between translational positions occurs in a facile manner on some sequences. However, the effect of the N-terminal tails on the positioning and movement of a nucleosome appears to be dependent on the DNA sequence such that the contribution of the tails can be masked by very high affinity DNA sequences. Our results suggest a mechanism whereby sequence-dependent nucleosome positioning can be specifically altered by regulated changes in histone tail-DNA interactions in chromatin.     

Sequence motifs and free energies of selected natural and non-natural nucleosome positioning DNA sequences.

Our laboratories recently completed SELEX experiments to isolate DNA sequences that most-strongly favor or disfavor nucleosome formation and positioning, from the entire mouse genome or from even more diverse pools of chemically synthetic random sequence DNA. Here we directly compare these selected natural and non-natural sequences. We find that the strongest natural positioning sequences have affinities for histone binding and nucleosome formation that are sixfold or more lower than those possessed by many of the selected non-natural sequences. We conclude that even the highest-affinity sequence regions of eukaryotic genomes are not evolved for the highest affinity or nucleosome positioning power. Fourier transform calculations on the selected natural sequences reveal a special significance for nucleosome positioning of a motif consisting of approximately 10 bp periodic placement of TA dinucleotide steps. Contributions to histone binding and nucleosome formation from periodic TA steps are more significant than those from other periodic steps such as AA (=TT), CC (=GG) and more important than those from the other YR steps (CA (=TG) and CG), which are reported to have greater conformational flexibility in protein-DNA complexes even than TA. We report the development of improved procedures for measuring the free energies of even stronger positioning sequences that may be isolated in the future, and show that when the favorable free energy of histone-DNA interactions becomes sufficiently large, measurements based on the widely used exchange method become unreliable.     

Multiple Aspects of ATP-Dependent Nucleosome Translocation by RSC and Mi-2 Are Directed by the Underlying DNA Sequence

Background

Chromosome structure, DNA metabolic processes and cell type identity can all be affected by changing the positions of nucleosomes along chromosomal DNA, a reaction that is catalysed by SNF2-type ATP-driven chromatin remodelers. Recently it was suggested that in vivo, more than 50% of the nucleosome positions can be predicted simply by DNA sequence, especially within promoter regions. This seemingly contrasts with remodeler induced nucleosome mobility. The ability of remodeling enzymes to mobilise nucleosomes over short DNA distances is well documented. However, the nucleosome translocation processivity along DNA remains elusive. Furthermore, it is unknown what determines the initial direction of movement and how new nucleosome positions are adopted.

Methodology/Principal Findings

We have used AFM imaging and high resolution PAGE of mononucleosomes on 600 and 2500 bp DNA molecules to analyze ATP-dependent nucleosome repositioning by native and recombinant SNF2-type enzymes. We report that the underlying DNA sequence can control the initial direction of translocation, translocation distance, as well as the new positions adopted by nucleosomes upon enzymatic mobilization. Within a strong nucleosomal positioning sequence both recombinant Drosophila Mi-2 (CHD-type) and native RSC from yeast (SWI/SNF-type) repositioned the nucleosome at 10 bp intervals, which are intrinsic to the positioning sequence. Furthermore, RSC-catalyzed nucleosome translocation was noticeably more efficient when beyond the influence of this sequence. Interestingly, under limiting ATP conditions RSC preferred to position the nucleosome with 20 bp intervals within the positioning sequence, suggesting that native RSC preferentially translocates nucleosomes with 15 to 25 bp DNA steps.

Conclusions/Significance

Nucleosome repositioning thus appears to be influenced by both remodeler intrinsic and DNA sequence specific properties that interplay to define ATPase-catalyzed repositioning. Here we propose a successive three-step framework consisting of initiation, translocation and release steps to describe SNF2-type enzyme mediated nucleosome translocation along DNA. This conceptual framework helps resolve the apparent paradox between the high abundance of ATP-dependent remodelers per nucleus and the relative success of sequence-based predictions of nucleosome positioning in vivo.     

Human centromere protein B induces translational positioning of nucleosomes on alpha-satellite sequences

The human centromere proteins A (CENP-A) and B (CENP-B) are the fundamental centromere components of chromosomes. CENP-A is the centromere-specific histone H3 variant, and CENP-B specifically binds a 17-base pair sequence (the CENP-B box), which appears within every other alpha-satellite DNA repeat. In the present study, we demonstrated centromere-specific nucleosome formation in vitro with recombinant proteins, including histones H2A, H2B, H4, CENP-A, and the DNA-binding domain of CENP-B. The CENP-A nucleosome wraps 147 base pairs of the alpha-satellite sequence within its nucleosome core particle, like the canonical H3 nucleosome. Surprisingly, CENP-B binds to nucleosomal DNA when the CENP-B box is wrapped within the nucleosome core particle and induces translational positioning of the nucleosome without affecting its rotational setting. This CENP-B-induced translational positioning only occurs when the CENP-B box sequence is settled in the proper rotational setting with respect to the histone octamer surface. Therefore, CENP-B may be a determinant for translational positioning of the centromere-specific nucleosomes through its binding to the nucleosomal CENP-B box.