<Emphasis Type="Italic">Drosophila melanogaster</Emphasis> as a model for studying the function of animal viral proteins

Studies in which Drosophila melanogaster individuals carrying transgenes of animal viruses were used to analyze the action of animal viral proteins on the cell are reviewed. The data presented suggest that host specificity of viruses is determined by their proteins responsible for the penetration of the virus into the cell, while viral proteins responsible for interactions with the host cell are much less host-specific. Due to this, the model of Drosophila with its developed system of searching for genetic interactions can be used to find intracellular targets for the action of viral proteins of the second group.     

Role of host reticulon proteins in rearranging membranes for positive-strand RNA virus replication

Positive-strand RNA [(+)RNA] viruses are responsible for numerous human, animal, and plant diseases. Because of the limiting coding capacity of (+)RNA viruses, their replication requires a complex orchestration of interactions between the viral genome, viral proteins and exploited host factors. To replicate their genomic RNAs, (+)RNA viruses induce membrane rearrangements that create membrane-linked RNA replication compartments. Along with substantial advances on the ultrastructure of the membrane-bound RNA replication compartments, recent results have shed light into the role that host factors play in rearranging these membranes. This review focuses on recent insights that have driven a new understanding of the role that the membrane-shaping host reticulon homology domain proteins (RHPs) play in facilitating the replication of various (+)RNA viruses.     

Viral proteomics: global evaluation of viruses and their interaction with the host

Viruses constantly adapt to and modulate the host environment during replication and propagation. Both DNA and RNA viruses encode multifunctional proteins that interact with and modify host cell proteins. While viral genomes were the first complete sequences known, the corresponding proteomes are only now elucidated, with some surprising results. Even more daunting is the task to globally monitor the impact of viral infection on the proteome of the host cell and many technical hurdles must still be overcome in order to facilitate robust and reproducible measurements. Further complicating the picture is the dynamic nature of proteins, including post-translational modifications, enzymatic cleavage and activation or destruction by proteolytic events. Nevertheless, several promising studies have been published using high-throughput methods directly measuring protein abundance. Particularly, quantitative or semiquantitative mass spectrometry-based analysis of viral and cellular proteomes are now being used to characterize viruses and their host interaction. In addition, the full set of interactions between viral and host proteins, the interactome, is beginning to emerge, with often unexpected interactions that need to be carefully validated. In this review, we will discuss two major areas of viral proteomics: first, virion proteomics (such as the protein characterization of viral particles) and second, proteoviromics, including the viral protein interactomics and the quantitative analysis of host cell proteome during viral infection.     

Viral proteomics: global evaluation of viruses and their interaction with the host

Viruses constantly adapt to and modulate the host environment during replication and propagation. Both DNA and RNA viruses encode multifunctional proteins that interact with and modify host cell proteins. While viral genomes were the first complete sequences known, the corresponding proteomes are only now elucidated, with some surprising results. Even more daunting is the task to globally monitor the impact of viral infection on the proteome of the host cell and many technical hurdles must still be overcome in order to facilitate robust and reproducible measurements. Further complicating the picture is the dynamic nature of proteins, including post-translational modifications, enzymatic cleavage and activation or destruction by proteolytic events. Nevertheless, several promising studies have been published using high-throughput methods directly measuring protein abundance. Particularly, quantitative or semiquantitative mass spectrometry-based analysis of viral and cellular proteomes are now being used to characterize viruses and their host interaction. In addition, the full set of interactions between viral and host proteins, the interactome, is beginning to emerge, with often unexpected interactions that need to be carefully validated. In this review, we will discuss two major areas of viral proteomics: first, virion proteomics (such as the protein characterization of viral particles) and second, proteoviromics, including the viral protein interactomics and the quantitative analysis of host cell proteome during viral infection.     

Interaction of viral proteins with host cell death machinery

In recent years, intense research has been directed towards understanding molecular mechanisms involved in viral pathogenesis. It is now known that many viruses manipulate host defense mechanisms to prevent apoptosis in order to maximize viral replication. Towards the end of their replication cycle, certain viruses direct the synthesis of proteins that induce apoptosis or cell lysis thereby facilitating viral release from the cell. The present review summarizes the current understanding of interactions between viral proteins and the host cell death machinery.     

Vesicular stomatitis virus growth in Drosophila melanogaster cells: G protein deficiency.

In cultured Drosophila melanogaster cells, vesicular stomatitis virus (VSV) established a persistent, noncytopathic infection. No inhibition of host protein synthesis occurred even though all cells were initially infected. No defective interfering particles were detected, which would explain the establishment of the carrier state. In studies of the time course of viral protein synthesis in Drosophila cells, N, NS, and M viral polypeptides were readily detected within 1 h of infection. The yield of G protein and one of its precursors; G1, was very low at any time of the virus cycle; the released viruses always contained four to five times less G than those produced by chicken embryo cells, whatever the VSV strain or serotype used for infection and whatever the Drosophila cell line used as host. Actinomycin D added to the cells before infection enhanced VSV growth up to eight times. G and G1 synthesis increased much more than that of the other viral proteins when the cells were pretreated with the drug; nevertheless, the released viruses exhibited the same deficiency in G protein as the VSV released from untreated cells. Host cell control on both G-protein maturation process and synthesis at traduction level is discussed in relation to G biological properties.     

Interaction of hepatitis C virus proteins with host cell membranes and lipids

For replication, viruses depend on specific components and energy supplies from the host cell. The main steps in the lifecycle of positive-strand RNA viruses depend on cellular membranes. Interest is increasing in studying the interactions between host cell membranes and viral proteins to understand how such viruses replicate their genome and produce infectious particles. These studies should also lead to a better knowledge of the different mechanisms underlying membrane-protein associations. The various molecular interactions of hepatitis C virus proteins with the membranes and lipids of the infected cell highlight how a virus can exploit the diversity of interactions that occur between proteins and membranes or lipid structures.     

Prediction of tyrosine sulfation sites in animal viruses

Post-translational modification of proteins by tyrosine sulfation enhances the affinity of extracellular ligand-receptor interactions important in the immune response and other biological processes in animals. For example, sulfated tyrosines in polyomavirus and varicella-zoster virus may help modulate host cell recognition and facilitate viral attachment and entry. Using a Position-Specific-Scoring-Matrix with an accuracy of 96.43%, we analyzed the possibility of tyrosine sulfation in all 1517 animal viruses available in the Swiss-Prot database. From a total of 97,729 tyrosines, we predicted 5091 sulfated tyrosine sites from 1024 viruses. Our site predictions in hemagglutinin of influenza A, VP4 of rotavirus, and US28 of cytomegalovirus strongly suggest an important link between tyrosine sulfation and viral disease mechanisms. In each of these three viral proteins, we observed highly conserved amino acid sequences surrounding predicted sulfated tyrosine sites. Tyrosine sulfation appears to be much more common in animal viruses than is currently recognized.     

Mechanisms of cell entry by influenza virus

A wide range of viruses, including many human and animal pathogens representing various taxonomic groups, contain genomes that are enclosed in lipid envelopes. These envelopes are generally acquired in the final stages of assembly, as viruses bud from regions of the membrane of the infected cell at which virally encoded membrane proteins have accumulated. The viruses procure their membranes during this process and mature particles 'pinch off' from the cellular membranes. Under most circumstances, initiation of another round of infection is dependent on two critical functions supplied by the envelope proteins. The virus must bind to cell-surface receptors of a new host cell, and fusion of the viral and cellular membranes must occur to transfer the viral genome into the cell. Enveloped viruses have evolved a variety of mechanisms to execute these two basic functions. Owing to their relative simplicity, studies of binding and fusion using enveloped viruses and their components have contributed significantly to the overall understanding of receptor-ligand interactions and membrane fusion processes - fundamental activities involved in a plethora of biological functions.     

Possible mechanisms of the transforming and tumorigenic effects of DNA-containing animal viruses

The literature devoted to oncogenic action of DNA-containing animal viruses and their role in the development of human neoplasias are reviewed. The regularities of persistence and expression of genetic material of DNA-containing viruses in transformed and tumor cells are comprehensively analyzed. The mechanisms of recombination of cellular and viral DNA during cell transformation as well as the specificity of integration of viral DNA into the host genome are considered. The functions and mechanisms of transforming and tumorigenic action of the products of oncogens of DNA-containing viruses of different groups are discussed. The data on the cell transformation by some DNA-containing viruses without oncogene expression are represented. The mechanism of cell transformation by DNA-containing viruses related to the activation of cellular oncogens is discussed.     

Viral and host proteins involved in picornavirus life cycle

Picornaviruses cause several diseases, not only in humans but also in various animal hosts. For instance, human enteroviruses can cause hand-foot-and-mouth disease, herpangina, myocarditis, acute flaccid paralysis, acute hemorrhagic conjunctivitis, severe neurological complications, including brainstem encephalitis, meningitis and poliomyelitis, and even death. The interaction between the virus and the host is important for viral replication, virulence and pathogenicity. This article reviews studies of the functions of viral and host factors that are involved in the life cycle of picornavirus. The interactions of viral capsid proteins with host cell receptors is discussed first, and the mechanisms by which the viral and host cell factors are involved in viral replication, viral translation and the switch from translation to RNA replication are then addressed. Understanding how cellular proteins interact with viral RNA or viral proteins, as well as the roles of each in viral infection, will provide insights for the design of novel antiviral agents based on these interactions.     

Viruses and the nucleolus: The fatal attraction

Viruses are small obligatory parasites and as a consequence, they have developed sophisticated strategies to exploit the host cell's functions to create an environment that favors their own replication. A common feature of most – if not all – families of human and non-human viruses concerns their interaction with the nucleolus. The nucleolus is a multifunctional nuclear domain, which, in addition to its well-known role in ribosome biogenesis, plays several crucial other functions. Viral infection induces important nucleolar alterations. Indeed, during viral infection numerous viral components localize in nucleoli, while various host nucleolar proteins are redistributed in other cell compartments or are modified, and non-nucleolar cellular proteins reach the nucleolus. This review highlights the interactions reported between the nucleolus and some human or animal viral families able to establish a latent or productive infection, selected on the basis of their known interactions with the nucleolus and the nucleolar activities, and their links with virus replication and/or pathogenesis. This article is part of a Special Issue entitled: Role of the Nucleolus in Human Disease.     

Reviewing host proteins of Rhabdoviridae: possible leads for lesser studied viruses

Rhabdoviridae, characterized by bullet-shaped viruses, is known for its diverse host range, which includes plants, arthropods, fishes and humans. Understanding the viral–host interactions of this family can prove beneficial in developing effective therapeutic strategies. The host proteins interacting with animal rhabdoviruses have been reviewed in this report. Several important host proteins commonly interacting with animal rhabdoviruses are being reported, some of which, interestingly, have molecular features, which can serve as potential antiviral targets. This review not only provides the generalized importance of the functions of animal rhabdovirus-associated host proteins for the first time but also compares them among the two most studied viruses, i.e. Rabies virus (RV) and Vesicular Stomatitis virus (VSV). The comparative data can be used for studying emerging viruses such as Chandipura virus (CHPV) and the lesser studied viruses such as Piry virus (PIRYV) and Isfahan virus (ISFV) of the Rhabdoviridae family.     

Viral modulators of cell death provide new links to old pathways

By observing how viruses facilitate their parasitic relationships with host cells, we gain insights into key regulatory pathways of the cell. Not only are mitochondria key players in the regulation of programmed cell death, but many viral regulators of cell death also alter mitochondrial functions either directly or indirectly. Although cytomegalovirus vMIA and Epstein-Barr virus BHRF1 seem to have opposite effects on mitochondrial morphology, they both inhibit cell death. Drosophila Reaper, a regulator of developmental cell death, acts on IAP (inhibitor of apoptosis) proteins to activate caspases, but can regulate mitochondrial permeability in vitro. Despite its pivotal role in Drosophila, homologues of Reaper in other species were not previously known. Recently, amino acid sequence similarity was recognized between Drosophila Reaper and a protein known to be important for the replication and virulence of mosquito-borne bunyaviruses that cause human encephalitis. Thus, viral mechanisms for regulating apoptosis are diverse and not fully elucidated but promise to provide new insights.     

Evasion and exploitation of chemokines by viruses

Chemokines and chemokine receptors play a critical role in the host defense against viruses by mobilizing leukocytes to sites of infection, injury and inflammation. In order to replicate successfully within their host organisms, viruses have devised novel strategies for exploiting or subverting chemokine networks. This review summarizes various mechanisms that are currently known to be used by viruses for modulating chemokine activities including viral homologs of chemokines and chemokine receptors and soluble viral chemokine binding proteins. Insight into these strategies is providing a wealth of information on viral-host interactions, the function of chemokines in host defense and may help to generate novel anti-chemokine agents for treating against viral diseases or inflammatory disorders.     

Characterization and role of lentivirus-associated host proteins

Enveloped viruses obtain their envelopes during the process of budding from infected cells. During this process, however, these viruses acquire parts of the host cell membranes and host cell-derived proteins as integral parts of their mature envelopes. These host-derived components of viral envelopes may subsequently exhibit various effects on the life cycle of the virus; virus cell interactions, especially host response to virus-incorporated self-proteins; and the pathogenesis of the disease induced by these viruses. Although it was known for some time that various viruses incorporate host cell-derived proteins, the issue of the role of these proteins has received increased attention, specifically in connection with human immunodeficiency virus (HIV) infection and development of acquired immunodeficiency syndrome (AIDS) in humans. The aim of this review is to summarize our current knowledge of the analysis and role of host-derived proteins associated with enveloped viruses, with emphasis on the potential role of these proteins in the pathogenesis of AIDS. Clearly, differences in the clinical outcome of those nonhuman primates infected with simian immunodeficiency virus (SIV) that are disease resistant compared with SIV-infected species that are disease susceptible provide a unique opportunity to determine whether differences in the incorporation of distinct sets of host proteins play a role with distinct clinical outcomes.     

Viral proteins and site-specific cleavage

The protease coded by a picornavirus is central in the control of the viral replication. It is essential in the production of virus structural proteins, and regulates the viral RNA replicase in infected cells. The properties of the poliovirus protease are summarized and compared with other viruses. The interaction of polio protease with host defenses was examined. A cellular ribosomal protease degrades poliovirus and other "foreign" proteins, thus restricting viral functions. However, shortly after infection, ribosomal protease activity is suppressed, and in virus-infected extracts the enzyme is degraded. A second line of defense are the protein antiproteases of animal sera. Some of these inhibitors are able to complex the polio protease. A regulatory pathway summarizing the possible interactions of viral protease and the host defenses is presented.     

Come in and take your coat off – how host cells provide endocytosis for virus entry

Viruses are intracellular parasites that rely upon the host cell machinery for their life cycle. Newly generated virus particles have to transmit their genomic information to uninfected cells/organisms. Viral entry is the process to gain access to viral replication sites within uninfected cells, a multistep course of events that starts with binding to target cells. Since viruses are simple in structure and composition and lack any locomotive capacity, viruses depend on hundreds of host cell proteins during entry. Most animal viruses take advantage of endocytosis to enter cells. Cell biological, morphological and biochemical studies, live cell imaging and systematic approaches have identified various new endocytic mechanisms besides clathrin‐mediated endocytosis, macropinocytosis and caveolar/lipid raft‐mediated endocytosis. Hence, studying virus entry has become ever more complex. This review provides a cell biological overview of the existing endocytic mechanisms and strategies used or potentially used by viruses to enter cells.     

Viruses as environmental mutagenic factors

Injections into Drosophila melanogaster males of 9 DNA- and RNA-containing viruses non-infectious for this insect, proved that all of them are highly mutagenic, inducing numerous gene mutations or microdeletions but no gross chromosome rearrangements. Relatively few specific loci are affected, they vary per virus, and the mutation rate for such a locus is extraordinarily high. These peculiarities of the mutagenic action of viruses closely resemble those of the mutagenic action of exogenous non-viral DNA earlier studied by the author and his co-workers. It was shown that the mutagenic element of a virus is its nucleic acid; viral proteins completely lack mutagenic properties. Virus-induced gene mutations are probably due to insertions of fragments of viral DNA (or cDNA) into the host chromosomes; at least some of these mutations are capable of transpositions and reversions. On the other hand, chromosome aberrations which arise in virus-infected cells are evidently produced secondarily by pathological disturbances of metabolic processes in the infected cells. Our results and literature data lead to the conclusion that a significant share of hereditary defects in man might be caused by viruses, even by those apathogenic for humans, particularly by attenuated live viral vaccines. It is, therefore, important to work on the creation of purely proteinaceous viral vaccines free from nucleic acids and thus genetically safe. The hazards of viral mutagenesis should also be kept in mind when preparing recombinant DNA molecules used in genetic engineering.     

A role for plant microtubules in the formation of transmission-specific inclusion bodies of Cauliflower mosaic virus

Interactions between microtubules and viruses play important roles in viral infection. The best-characterized examples involve transport of animal viruses by microtubules to the nucleus or other intracellular destinations. In plant viruses, most work to date has focused on interaction between viral movement proteins and the cytoskeleton, which is thought to be involved in viral cell-to-cell spread. We show here, in Cauliflower mosaic virus (CaMV)-infected plant cells, that viral electron-lucent inclusion bodies (ELIBs), whose only known function is vector transmission, require intact microtubules for their efficient formation. The kinetics of the formation of CaMV-related inclusion bodies in transfected protoplasts showed that ELIBs represent newly emerging structures, appearing at late stages of the intracellular viral life cycle. Viral proteins P2 and P3 are first produced in multiple electron-dense inclusion bodies, and are later specifically exported to transiently co-localize with microtubules, before concentrating in a single, massive ELIB in each infected cell. Treatments with cytoskeleton-affecting drugs suggested that P2 and P3 might be actively transported on microtubules, by as yet unknown motors. In addition to providing information on the intracellular life cycle of CaMV, our results show that specific interactions between host cell and virus may be dedicated to a later role in vector transmission. More generally, they indicate a new unexpected function for plant cell microtubules in the virus life cycle, demonstrating that microtubules act not only on immediate intracellular or intra-host phenomena, but also on processes ultimately controlling inter-host transmission.