Coordination of dual incision and repair synthesis in human nucleotide excision repair

Nucleotide excision repair (NER) requires the coordinated sequential assembly and actions of the involved proteins at sites of DNA damage. Following damage recognition, dual incision 5′ to the lesion by ERCC1‐XPF and 3′ to the lesion by XPG leads to the removal of a lesion‐containing oligonucleotide of about 30 nucleotides. The resulting single‐stranded DNA (ssDNA) gap on the undamaged strand is filled in by DNA repair synthesis. Here, we have asked how dual incision and repair synthesis are coordinated in human cells to avoid the exposure of potentially harmful ssDNA intermediates. Using catalytically inactive mutants of ERCC1‐XPF and XPG, we show that the 5′ incision by ERCC1‐XPF precedes the 3′ incision by XPG and that the initiation of repair synthesis does not require the catalytic activity of XPG. We propose that a defined order of dual incision and repair synthesis exists in human cells in the form of a ‘cut‐patch‐cut‐patch’ mechanism. This mechanism may aid the smooth progression through the NER pathway and contribute to genome integrity.     

Multiplicity of strand incision at G:T base mismatches in DNA by human cell extracts

Cell extract from the HT29 human colon carcinoma cell line (lacking mutator phenotype) was used to study the ATP-dependent G:T mismatch repair. We found that when a 45-bp (model) DNA with a single CpG/TpG mispair was incubated with the cell extract and ATP, it was incised immediately 5' and 3' to the mismatched T, and we noted that the actual 5'- and 3'-labeled fragments were similar to the cleaved products of thymine DNA glycosylase (TDG). This TDG-like cleavage product was enhanced (5-fold) with stimulation of several novel fragments, as inferred from the effect on incision at CpG/TpG site of the addition of G:U competitor DNA and ATP to the HT29 extract. The novel fragments were compatible with a strand incision on both sides of the mismatch (the third phosphodiester bond 5' and the second phosphodiester bond 3' to the mismatched T) and an incision 3' to the mismatched T, respectively. This suggests that while the ATP-dependent (TDG-like) incision activity, contrary to expectation, shows a lack of substrate competition, its catalytic property is likely modified by an interaction with G:U mispair. These multiple ATP-dependent incision events were not detected when extracts of the mismatch repair (MMR) defective HCT15 or HCT116 cell line were augmented with ATP and G:U. We postulate that these multiple ATP-dependent incision events possibly require the same MMR factors, and together they constitute a modified single ATP-dependent G:T incision activity. This activity toward the CpG/TpG was competitively inhibited by a 45-bp DNA with an ApG/TpT mispair; incision at a single site 5' to the latter mismatch compares with one of the multiple sites incised 5' to the former mismatch. These results suggest that one of several mismatch-incision factors is required by the human ATP-dependent G:T incision activity, in addition to MMR factors and ATP.