Protein cell surface display in Gram-positive bacteria: from single protein to macromolecular protein structure

In the course of evolution, Gram-positive bacteria, defined here as prokaryotes from the domain Bacteria with a cell envelope composed of one biological membrane (monodermita) and a cell wall composed at least of peptidoglycan and covalently linked teichoic acids, have developed several mechanisms permitting to a cytoplasmic synthesized protein to be present on the bacterial cell surface. Four major types of cell surface displayed proteins are currently recognized: (i) transmembrane proteins, (ii) lipoproteins, (iii) LPXTG-like proteins and (iv) cell wall binding proteins. The subset of proteins exposed on the bacterial cell surface, and thus interacting with extracellular milieu, constitutes the surfaceome. Here, we review exhaustively the current molecular mechanisms involved in protein attachment within the cell envelope of Gram-positive bacteria, from single protein to macromolecular protein structure.     

Protein secretion biotechnology in Gram-positive bacteria with special emphasis on Streptomyces lividans

Proteins secreted by Gram-positive bacteria are released into the culture medium with the obvious benefit that they usually retain their native conformation. This property makes these host cells potentially interesting for the production of recombinant proteins, as one can take full profit of established protocols for the purification of active proteins. Several state-of-the-art strategies to increase the yield of the secreted proteins will be discussed, using Streptomyces lividans as an example and compared with approaches used in some other host cells. It will be shown that approaches such as increasing expression and translation levels, choice of secretion pathway and modulation of proteins thereof, avoiding stress responses by changing expression levels of specific (stress) proteins, can be helpful to boost production yield. In addition, the potential of multi-omics approaches as a tool to understand the genetic background and metabolic fluxes in the host cell and to seek for new targets for strain and protein secretion improvement is discussed. It will be shown that S. lividans, along with other Gram-positive host cells, certainly plays a role as a production host for recombinant proteins in an economically viable way. This article is part of a Special Issue entitled: Protein trafficking and secretion in bacteria. Guest Editors: Anastassios Economou and Ross Dalbey.     

Glyceride-cysteine lipoproteins and secretion by Gram-positive bacteria.

The membrane penicillinases of Bacillus licheniformis and Bacillus cereus are lipoproteins with N-terminal glyceride thioether modification identical to that of the Escherichia coli outer membrane lipoprotein. They are readily labeled with [3H]palmitate present during exponential growth. At the same time, a few other proteins in each organism become labeled and can be detected by fluorography after sodium dodecyl sulfate-polyacrylamide gel electrophoresis of total membrane proteins. We distinguish these proteins from the O-acyl proteolipids by demonstrating the formation of glyceryl cysteine sulfone after performic acid oxidation and hydrolysis of the protein. By this criterion, B. licheniformis and B. cereus contain sets of lipoproteins larger in average molecular weight than that of E. coli. Members of the sets probably are under a variety of physiological controls, as indicated by widely differing relative labeling intensity in different media. The set in B. licheniformis shares with membrane penicillinase a sensitivity to release from protoplasts by mild trypsin treatment, which suggests similar orientation on the outside of the membrane. At least one protein is the membrane-bound partner of an extracellular hydrophilic protein, the pair being related as membrane and exopenicillinases are. We propose that the lipoproteins of gram-positive organisms are the functional equivalent of periplasmic proteins in E. coli and other gram-negative bacteria, prevented from release by anchorage to the membrane rather than by a selectively impermeable outer membrane.     

Protein secretion in bacteria.

Most secretory proteins are synthesized as precursors with an amino-terminal signal peptide. Genetic identification of proteins essential for signal peptide dependent translocation to the Escherichia coli periplasm has led to the biochemical dissection of the secretion pathway. Additional mechanisms exist in Gram-negative bacteria for protein secretion to the extracellular environment.     

Protein secretion in gram-positive bacteria.

Gram-positive bacteria often secrete large amounts of proteins into the surrounding medium. This feature makes them attractive as hosts for the industrial production of extracellular enzymes. Compared to Escherichia coli, relatively little is known about the mechanism of protein secretion in these organisms. However, the recent identification of Bacillus subtilis genes whose gene products are highly homologous to some of the Sec (secretion) proteins of E. coli strongly suggests that important principles of protein translocation across the plasma membrane might be highly conserved. In contrast, the steps following the actual translocation event might be different in Gram-positive and Gram-negative bacteria. The scope of this review is to outline the recent progress that has been made in the elucidation of the secretion pathway in Gram-positive bacteria and to discuss potential applications in strain improvement for the industrial production of extracellular proteins.     

Protein transport across the cell wall of monoderm Gram-positive bacteria

In monoderm (single-membrane) Gram-positive bacteria, the majority of secreted proteins are first translocated across the cytoplasmic membrane into the inner wall zone. For a subset of these proteins, final destination is within the cell envelope as either membrane-anchored or cell wall-anchored proteins, whereas another subset of proteins is destined to be transported across the cell wall into the extracellular milieu. Although the cell wall is a porous structure, there is evidence that, for some proteins, transport is a regulated process. This review aims at describing what is known about the mechanisms that regulate the transport of proteins across the cell wall of monoderm Gram-positive bacteria.     

Protein sorting to the cell wall envelope of Gram-positive bacteria

The covalent anchoring of surface proteins to the cell wall envelope of Gram-positive bacteria occurs by a universal mechanism requiring sortases, extracellular transpeptidases that are positioned in the plasma membrane. Surface protein precursors are first initiated into the secretory pathway of Gram-positive bacteria via N-terminal signal peptides. C-terminal sorting signals of surface proteins, bearing an LPXTG motif or other recognition sequences, provide for sortase-mediated cleavage and acyl enzyme formation, a thioester linkage between the active site cysteine residue of sortase and the C-terminal carboxyl group of cleaved surface proteins. During cell wall anchoring, sortase acyl enzymes are resolved by the nucleophilic attack of peptidoglycan substrates, resulting in amide bond formation between the C-terminal end of surface proteins and peptidoglycan cross-bridges within the bacterial cell wall envelope. The genomes of Gram-positive bacteria encode multiple sortase genes. Recent evidence suggests that sortase enzymes catalyze protein anchoring reactions of multiple different substrate classes with different sorting signal motif sequences, protein linkage to unique cell wall anchor structures as well as protein polymerization leading to the formation of pili on the surface of Gram-positive bacteria.     

A fast screening method for surface layers on Gram-positive bacteria

A two-step screening method is described to identify regularly arranged surface layers (S layers) on Gram-positive bacterial strains. A non-destructive release of S-layer sheets is achieved by enzymatic hydrolysis of the underlying peptidoglycan using lysozyme. The existence of regular S layers is then directly confirmed by scanning force microscopy or transmission electron microscopy. This method requires a minimal amount of bacterial cells and may be used as a `quick test' for demonstrating the presence of S layers.     

Selenoproteins in Archaea and Gram-positive bacteria

Selenium is an essential trace element for many organisms by serving important catalytic roles in the form of the 21st co-translationally inserted amino acid selenocysteine. It is mostly found in redox-active proteins in members of all three domains of life and analysis of the ever-increasing number of genome sequences has facilitated identification of the encoded selenoproteins. Available data from biochemical, sequence, and structure analyses indicate that Gram-positive bacteria synthesize and incorporate selenocysteine via the same pathway as enterobacteria. However, recent in vivo studies indicate that selenocysteine-decoding is much less stringent in Gram-positive bacteria than in Escherichia coli. For years, knowledge about the pathway of selenocysteine synthesis in Archaea and Eukarya was only fragmentary, but genetic and biochemical studies guided by analysis of genome sequences of Sec-encoding archaea has not only led to the characterization of the pathways but has also shown that they are principally identical. This review summarizes current knowledge about the metabolic pathways of Archaea and Gram-positive bacteria where selenium is involved, about the known selenoproteins, and about the respective pathways employed in selenoprotein synthesis.     

Protein secretion and membrane insertion systems in gram-negative bacteria

In contrast to other organisms, gram-negative bacteria have evolved numerous systems for protein export. Eight types are known that mediate export across or insertion into the cytoplasmic membrane, while eight specifically mediate export across or insertion into the outer membrane. Three of the former secretory pathway (SP) systems, type I SP (ISP, ABC), IIISP (Fla/Path) and IVSP (Conj/Vir), can export proteins across both membranes in a single energy-coupled step. A fourth generalized mechanism for exporting proteins across the two-membrane envelope in two distinct steps (which we here refer to as type II secretory pathways [IISP]) utilizes either the general secretory pathway (GSP or Sec) or the twin-arginine targeting translocase for translocation across the inner membrane, and either the main terminal branch or one of several protein-specific export systems for translocation across the outer membrane. We here survey the various well-characterized protein translocation systems found in living organisms and then focus on the systems present in gram-negative bacteria. Comparisons between these systems suggest specific biogenic, mechanistic and evolutionary similarities as well as major differences.     

Sortase enzymes in Gram-positive bacteria

In Gram-positive bacteria proteins are displayed on the cell surface using sortase enzymes. These cysteine transpeptidases join proteins bearing an appropriate sorting signal to strategically positioned amino groups on the cell surface. Working alone, or in concert with other enzymes, sortases either attach proteins to the cross-bridge peptide of the cell wall or they link proteins together to form pili. Because surface proteins play a fundamental role in microbial physiology and are frequently virulence factors, sortase enzymes have been intensely studied since their discovery a little more than a decade ago. Based on their primary sequences and functions sortases can be partitioned into distinct families called class A to F enzymes. Most bacteria elaborate their surfaces using more than one type of sortase that function non-redundantly by recognizing unique sorting signals within their protein substrates. Here we review what is known about the functions of these enzymes and the molecular basis of catalysis. Particular emphasis is placed on 'pilin' specific class C sortases that construct structurally complex pili. Exciting new data have revealed that these enzymes are amazingly promiscuous in the substrates that they can employ and that there is a startling degree of diversity in their mechanism of action. We also review recent data that suggest that sortases are targeted to specific sites on the cell surface where they work with other sortases and accessory factors to properly function.     

Soluble bacterial constituents down-regulate secretion of IL-12 in response to intact Gram-positive bacteria

Intact Gram-positive bacteria induce production of large amounts of IL-12 from freshly isolated human monocytes. Here the bacterial structures and signalling pathways involved were studied and compared with those leading to IL-6 production, and to IL-12 production in response to LPS after IFN-gamma pre-treatment. Intact bifidobacteria induced massive production of IL-12 (1 ng/ml) and IL-6 (>30 ng/ml) from human PBMC, whereas fragmented bifidobacteria induced IL-6, but no IL-12. IL-12 production induced by intact bifidobacteria was inhibited by pre-treatment with bifidobacterial sonicate, peptidoglycan, muramyl dipeptide, lipoteichoic acid, the soluble TLR2 agonist Pam(3)Cys-SK(4), or anti-TLR2 antibodies. Blocking of phagocytosis by cytochalasin, inhibition of the JNK or NF-kappaB pathways or treatment with Wortmannin also reduced the IL-12 response to intact Gram-positive bacteria. LPS induced moderate levels of IL-12 (0.31 ng/ml), but only from IFN-gamma pre-treated PBMC. This IL-12 production was enhanced by Wortmannin and unaffected by blocking the JNK pathway. Thus, intact Gram-positive bacteria trigger monocyte production of large amounts of IL-12 via a distinct pathway that is turned off by fragmented Gram-positive bacteria. This may be a physiological feedback, since such fragments may signal that further activation of the phagocyte via the IL-12/IFN-gamma loop is unnecessary.     

Hyaluronidases of Gram-positive bacteria

Bacterial hyaluronidases, enzymes capable of breaking down hyaluronate, are produced by a number of pathogenic Gram-positive bacteria that initiate infections at the skin or mucosal surfaces. Since reports of the hyaluronidases first appeared, there have been numerous suggestions as to the role of the enzyme in the disease process. Unlike some of the other more well studied virulence factors, much of the information on the role of hyaluronidase is speculative, with little or no data to substantiate proposed roles. Over the last 5 years, a number of these enzymes from Gram-positive organisms have been cloned, and the nucleotide sequence determined. Phylogenetic analysis, using the deduced amino acid sequences of the Gram-positive hyaluronidases, suggests a relatedness among some of the enzymes. Molecular advances may lead to a more thorough understanding of the role of hyaluronidases in bacterial physiology and pathogenesis.     

Peptidoglycan turnover and recycling in Gram-positive bacteria

Bacterial cells are protected by an exoskeleton, the stabilizing and shape-maintaining cell wall, consisting of the complex macromolecule peptidoglycan. In view of its function, it could be assumed that the cell wall is a static structure. In truth, however, it is steadily broken down by peptidoglycan-cleaving enzymes during cell growth. In this process, named cell wall turnover, in one generation up to half of the preexisting peptidoglycan of a bacterial cell is released from the wall. This would result in a massive loss of cell material, if turnover products were not be taken up and recovered. Indeed, in the Gram-negative model organism Escherichia coli, peptidoglycan recovery has been recognized as a complex pathway, named cell wall recycling. It involves about a dozen dedicated recycling enzymes that convey cell wall turnover products to peptidoglycan synthesis or energy pathways. Whether Gram-positive bacteria also recover their cell wall is currently questioned. Given the much larger portion of peptidoglycan in the cell wall of Gram-positive bacteria, however, recovery of the wall material would provide an even greater benefit in these organisms compared to Gram-negatives. Consistently, in many Gram-positives, orthologs of recycling enzymes were identified, indicating that the cell wall may also be recycled in these organisms. This mini-review provides a compilation of information about cell wall turnover and recycling in Gram-positive bacteria during cell growth and division, including recent findings relating to muropeptide recovery in Bacillus subtilis and Clostridium acetobutylicum from our group. Furthermore, the impact of cell wall turnover and recycling on biotechnological processes is discussed.     

Biofilm formation and dispersal in Gram-positive bacteria

Biofilms are structured communities of bacteria, which are adhered to a surface and embedded in a self-produced matrix of extracellular polymeric substances. Since biofilms are very resistant to antimicrobial agents, they are at the basis of a range of problems, including quality and safety issues in food industry. Recently, major advances have been made in elucidating the different structural components of the biofilm matrix, the regulatory pathways involved in biofilm formation, and signaling molecules involved in biofilm formation and dispersal, which provide opportunities for prevention and control of these biofilms in the food industry.     

Extracellular vesicle production in Gram-positive bacteria

This is a highlight on the article ‘Extracellular vesicle formation in Lactococcus lactis is stimulated by prophage-encoded holin-lysin system’ by Yue Liu, Eddy Smid and Tjakko Abee.     

Efflux-mediated drug resistance in Gram-positive bacteria

Gram-positive bacteria express numerous membrane transporters that promote the efflux of various drugs, including many antibiotics, from the cell to the outer medium. Drug transporters can be specific to a particular drug, or can have broad specificity, as in so-called multidrug transporters. This broad specificity can be a consequence of the hydrophobic nature of transported molecules, as suggested by recent structural studies of soluble multidrug-binding proteins. Although the functions of drug transporters may involve both the protection of bacteria from outside toxins and the transport of natural metabolites, their clinical importance lies largely in providing Gram-positive pathogens with resistance to macrolides, tetracyclines and fluoroquinolones. A number of agents, discovered in recent years, that inhibit drug transporters can potentially be used to overcome efflux-associated antibiotic resistance.