The Aspergillus nidulans uvsB gene encodes an ATM-related kinase required for multiple facets of the DNA damage response

In Aspergillus nidulans, uvsB and uvsD belong to the same epistasis group of DNA repair mutants. Recent observations suggest that these genes are likely to control cell cycle checkpoint responses to DNA damage and incomplete replication. Consistent with this notion, we show here that UVSB is a member of the conserved family of ATM-related kinases. Phenotypic characterization of uvsB mutants shows that they possess defects in additional aspects of the DNA damage response besides checkpoint control, including inhibition of septum formation, regulation of gene expression, and induced mutagenesis. The musN227 mutation partially suppresses the poor growth and DNA damage sensitivity of uvsB mutants. Although musN227 partially suppresses several uvsB defects, it does not restore checkpoint function to uvsB mutants. Notably, the failure of uvsB mutants to restrain septum formation in the presence of DNA damage is suppressed by the musN227 mutation. We propose that UVSB functions as the central regulator of the A. nidulans DNA damage response, whereas MUSN promotes recovery by modulating a subset of the response.     

Genomic instability and cancer: networks involved in response to DNA damage

A new approach to cancer and new methods in examining rare human chromosome breakage syndromes have brought to light complex interactions between different pathways involved in damage response, cell cycle checkpoint control and DNA repair. The genes affected in these different syndromes are involved in networks of processes that respond to DNA damage and prevent chromosomal aberrations during the cell cycle. The genes involved include the ATM, ATR, FA-associated genes, NBS1 and the cancer susceptibility genes BRCA1 and BRCA2. Chromosomal instability is a common feature of many human cancers and most of the instability syndromes, characterized by sensitivity to different types of DNA damage, also show increased cancer susceptibility. Better understanding of these syndromes and their links with familial cancer provide new insight into associations between defects in DNA damage response, cell cycle control, DNA repair and cancer. Understanding the damage response repair networks that these studies are revealing will have important implications for the development of cancer management and treatment.     

The DNA damage response in filamentous fungi

The mechanisms used by fungal cells to repair DNA damage have been subjects of intensive investigation for almost 50 years. As a result, the model yeasts Schizosaccharomyces pombe and Saccharomyces cerevisiae have led the way in yielding critical insights into the nature of the DNA damage response. At the same time, largely through the efforts of Etta Kafer, Hirokazu Inoue, and colleagues, a substantial collection of Aspergillus nidulans and Neurospora crassa DNA repair mutants has been identified and characterized in detail. As the analysis of these mutants continues and increasing amounts of annotated genome sequence become available, it is becoming readily apparent that the DNA damage response of filamentous fungi possesses several features that distinguish it from the model yeasts. These features are emphasized in this review, which describes the genes, regulatory networks, and processes that compose the fungal DNA damage response. Further characterization of this response will likely yield general insights that are applicable to animals and plants. Moreover, it may also become evident that the DNA damage response can be manipulated to control fungal growth.     

Genetic interactions of the Aspergillus nidulans atmAATM homolog with different components of the DNA damage response pathway

Ataxia telangiectasia mutated (ATM) is a phosphatidyl-3-kinase-related protein kinase that functions as a central regulator of the DNA damage response in eukaryotic cells. In humans, mutations in ATM cause the devastating neurodegenerative disease ataxia telangiectasia. Previously, we characterized the homolog of ATM (AtmA) in the filamentous fungus Aspergillus nidulans. In addition to its expected role in the DNA damage response, we found that AtmA is also required for polarized hyphal growth. Here, we extended these studies by investigating which components of the DNA damage response pathway are interacting with AtmA. The AtmA(ATM) loss of function caused synthetic lethality when combined with mutation in UvsB(ATR). Our results suggest that AtmA and UvsB are interacting and they are probably partially redundant in terms of DNA damage sensing and/or repairing and polar growth. We identified and inactivated A. nidulans chkA(CHK1) and chkB(CHK2) genes. These genes are also redundantly involved in A. nidulans DNA damage response. We constructed several combinations of double mutants for DeltaatmA, DeltauvsB, DeltachkA, and DeltachkB. We observed a complex genetic relationship with these mutations during the DNA replication checkpoint and DNA damage response. Finally, we observed epistatic and synergistic interactions between AtmA, and bimE(APC1), ankA(WEE1) and the cdc2-related kinase npkA, at S-phase checkpoint and in response to DNA-damaging agents.     

A point mutation in the Aspergillus nidulans sonBNup98 nuclear pore complex gene causes conditional DNA damage sensitivity

The nuclear pore complex (NPC) is embedded in the nuclear envelope where it mediates transport between the cytoplasm and nucleus and helps to organize nuclear architecture. We previously isolated sonB1, a mutation encoding a single amino acid substitution within the Aspergillus nidulans SONBnNup98 NPC protein (nucleoporin). Here we demonstrate that this mutation causes marked DNA damage sensitivity at 42 degrees . Although SONBnNup98 has roles in the G2 transition, we demonstrate that the G2 DNA damage checkpoint is functional in the sonB1 mutant at 42 degrees . The MRN complex is composed of MRE11, RAD50, and NBS1 and functions in checkpoint signaling, DNA repair, and telomere maintenance. At 42 degrees we find that the DNA damage response defect of sonB1 mutants causes synthetic lethality when combined with mutations in scaANBS1, the A. nidulans homolog of NBS1. We provide evidence that this synthetic lethality is independent of MRN cell cycle checkpoint functions or MREAMRE11-mediated DNA repair functions. We also demonstrate that the single A. nidulans histone H2A gene contains the C-terminal SQE motif of histone H2AX isoforms and that this motif is required for the DNA damage response. We propose that the sonB1 nucleoporin mutation causes a defect in a novel part of the DNA damage response.     

Cell Cycle Activation in Postmitotic Neurons is Essential for DNA Repair

Increasing evidence indicates that maintenance of neuronal homeostasis involves theactivation of the cell cycle machinery in postmitotic neurons. Our recent findings suggestthat cell cycle activation is essential for DNA damage-induced neuronal apoptosis.However, whether the cell division cycle also participates in DNA repair and survival ofpostmitotic, terminally differentiated neurons, is unknown. Here, we tested thehypothesis that G1 phase components contribute to the repair of DNA and are involved inthe DNA damage response of postmitotic neurons. In cortical terminally differentiatedneurons, treatment with subtoxic concentrations of hydrogen peroxide (H2O2) causedrepairable DNA double-strand breaks (DSBs) and the activation of G1 components of thecell cycle machinery. Importantly, DNA repair was attenuated if cyclin-dependentkinases CDK4 and CDK6, essential elements of G0→G1 transition, were suppressed.Our data suggest that G1 cell cycle components are involved in DNA repair and survivalof postmitotic neurons.     

Dual cell cycle checkpoints sensitive to chromosome replication and DNA damage in the budding yeast Saccharomyces cerevisiae.

In eucaryotic cells chromosomes must be fully replicated and repaired before mitosis begins. Genetic studies indicate that this dependence of mitosis on completion of DNA replication and DNA repair derives from a negative control called a checkpoint which somehow checks for replication and DNA damage and blocks cell entry into mitosis. Here we summarize our current understanding of the genetic components of the cell cycle checkpoint in budding yeast. Mutants were identified and their phase and signal specificity tested primarily through interactions of the arrest-defective mutants with cell division cycle mutants. The results indicate that dual checkpoint controls exist in budding yeast, one control sensitive to inhibition of DNA replication (S-phase checkpoint), and a distinct but overlapping control sensitive to DNA repair (G2 checkpoint). Six genes are required for arrest in G2 phase after DNA damage (RAD9, RAD17, RAD24, MEC1, MEC2, and MEC3), and two of these are also essential for arrest in S phase when DNA replication is blocked (MEC1 and MEC2).     

Use of algae in the study of essential cell processes

Maintenance of genomic stability is of crucial importance for all living organisms. It is no surprise that during evolution, a series of highly selective and efficient systems to detect DNA damage and control its repair have evolved. To this end, signal transduction pathways are involved in pausing the cell division cycle to provide time for repair, and ultimately releasing the cell cycle from arrest. Genetic components of the damage and replication checkpoints have been identified and a working model is beginning to emerge. This area of biological inquiry has received a great deal of attention in the past decade with the realization that the underlying regulatory mechanisms controlling the cell cycle are conserved throughout eukaryotic evolution. Many of the key players in this response have structural and functional counterparts in species as diverse as yeast and human. In recent years attention has also been paid to the plant kingdom suggesting that checkpoint controls have been highly conserved during evolution. The unicellular green alga Chlamydomonas reinhardtii is a suitable model organism for the study of basic cellular processes including cell cycle regulation and DNA repair. To investigate how algal cells accomplish these tasks, we have isolated mutants in the recognition and repair of DNA damage or in the response to DNA damage. Presented at the International Symposium Biology and Taxonomy of Green Algae V, Smolenice, June 26–29, 2007, Slovakia.     

Identification of a topoisomerase I mutant,scsA1, as an extragenic suppressor of a mutation in scaA(NBS1), the apparent homolog of human nibrin in Aspergillus nidulans

The Mre11-Rad50-Nbs1 protein complex has emerged as a central player in the human cellular DNA damage response, and recent observations suggest that these proteins are at least partially responsible for the linking of DNA damage detection to DNA repair and cell cycle checkpoint functions. Mutations in scaA(NBS1), which encodes the apparent homolog of human nibrin in Aspergillus nidulans, inhibit growth in the presence of the antitopoisomerase I drug camptothecin. This article describes the selection and characterization of extragenic suppressors of the scaA1 mutation, with the aim of identifying other proteins that interfere with the pathway or complex in which the ScaA would normally be involved. Fifteen extragenic suppressors of the scaA1 mutation were isolated. The topoisomerase I gene can complement one of these suppressors. Synergistic interaction between the scaA(NBS1) and scsA(TOP1) genes in the presence of DNA-damaging agents was observed. Overexpression of topoisomerase I in the scaA1 mutant causes increased sensitivity to DNA-damaging agents. The scsA(TOP1) and the scaA(NBS1) gene products could functionally interact in pathways that either monitor or repair DNA double-strand breaks.     

Repair of alkylation damage in the fungus Aspergillus nidulans

The repair of alkylation damage in Aspergillus nidulans was investigated. We have assayed soluble protein fractions for enzymes known to be involved in the repair of this type of damage in DNA. The presence of a glycosylase activity that can remove 3-methyladenine from DNA was demonstrated, as well as a DNA methyltransferase activity that appears to act against O6-methylguanine. In addition to this approach, a series of mutants were isolated which display increased sensitivity to alkylating agents (sag mutants). 5 such mutants were further characterized, and at least 4 are shown to map to genes which have not previously been characterized. The behaviour of double mutant combinations demonstrates the existence of at least 2 pathways for the repair of alkylation damage. The majority of the sag mutants (sagA1, sagB2, sag4 and sagE5) exhibit an increased sensitivity to a range of alkylating agents, but not to UV light, while sagC3, when irradiated at the germling stage, also shows sensitivity to UV. None of the mutants isolated are defective in either the 3-methyladenine DNA glycosylase activity, or the DNA methyltransferase activity, and the nature of the defects in these strains remains to be determined.     

Different roles of the Mre11 complex in the DNA damage response in Aspergillus nidulans

The Mre11-Rad50-Nbs1 protein complex has emerged as a central player in the cellular DNA damage response. Mutations in scaANBS1, which encodes the apparent homologue of human Nbs1 in Aspergillus nidulans, inhibit growth in the presence of the anti-topoisomerase I drug camptothecin. We have used the scaANBS1 cDNA as a bait in a yeast two-hybrid screening and report the identification of the A. nidulans Mre11 homologue (mreA). The inactivated mreA strain was more sensitive to several DNA damaging and oxidative stress agents. Septation in A. nidulans is dependent not only on the uvsBATR gene, but also on the mre11 complex. scaANBS1 and mreA genes are both involved in the DNA replication checkpoint whereas mreA is specifically involved in the intra-S-phase checkpoint. ScaANBS1 also participates in G2-M checkpoint control upon DNA damage caused by MMS. In addition, the scaANBS1 gene is also important for ascospore viability, whereas mreA is required for successful meiosis in A. nidulans. Consistent with this view, the Mre11 complex and the uvsCRAD51 gene are highly expressed at the mRNA level during the sexual development.     

Molecular parameters of genome instability: roles of fragile genes at common fragile sites

Common chromosome fragile sites occur at specific sequences within mammalian genomes that exhibit apparent single-stranded regions in mitotic chromosomes on exposure of cells to replication stress. Recent progress in the characterization of sequences, and more precise mapping of common fragile sites in mammalian and yeast genomes, has led to the exact placement of large common fragile regions straddling the borders of chromosomal G and R bands, with early and late replicating genomic regions, respectively, and could lead to breakthroughs in understanding the function of these evolutionarily conserved but highly recombinogenic chromosome elements. Deficiency of genes involved in DNA damage checkpoint responses, such as ATR, CHK1, HUS1 leads to increased frequency of fragile site instability. Some of these fragile sites, particularly FRA3B, encode genes that are themselves involved in the protection of cells from DNA damage through various mechanisms. Protection of mammalian genomes from accumulation of DNA damage in somatic cells is critical during development, puberty and during the reproductive lifespan, and occurs through mechanisms involving surveillance of the genome for damage, signals to the cell cycle machinery to stop cell cycle progression, signals to repair machinery to repair damage, signals to resume cycling or initiate apoptotic programs, depending on the extent of damage and repair. When genes involved in these processes are altered or deleted, cancer can occur. The tumor suppressor gene, FHIT at the FRA3B locus, and possibly other fragile genes, is a common target of damage and paradoxically encodes a protein with roles in protection from DNA damage.     

Cell cycle re-entry mechanisms after DNA damage checkpoints: Giving it some gas to shut off the breaks!

In order to maintain genetic integrity, cells are equipped with cell cycle checkpoints that detect DNA damage, orchestrate repair, and if necessary, eliminate severely damaged cells by inducing apoptotic cell death. The mitotic machinery is now emerging as an important determinant of the cellular responses to DNA damage where it functions as both the downstream target and the upstream regulator of the G2/M checkpoint. Cell cycle kinases and the DNA damage checkpoint kinases appear to reciprocally control each other. Specifically, cell cycle kinases control the inactivation of DNA damage checkpoint signaling. Termination of a DNA damage response by mitotic kinases appears to be an evolutionary conserved mechanism that allows resumption of cell cycle progression. Here we review recent reports in which molecular mechanisms underlying checkpoint silencing at the G2/M transition are elucidated.     

UV-induced DNA degradation in Aspergillus nidulans cells]

UV-induced DNA degradation was studied in mycellial cells of Aspergillus nidulans wild type and several uvs mutants. It was shown to be an enzymatic specific process which possibly reflects the excision of pyrimidine dimers from UV-damaged DNA. Inhibition of DNA degradation by caffeine and 2,4-dinitrophenol shows the connection between degradation and repair of DNA. Two ways of DNA degradation were found in A. nidulans cells, one of them being glucose dependent and the other--glucose independent. The dependence of DNA degradation on protein synthesis before and after UV-irradiation was demonstrated. The scheme of ways of DNA degradation and its genetic control were suggested on the basis of uvs mutations effect on UV-induced DNA degradation.     

Why do Neurons Enter the Cell Cycle?

Increasing evidence indicates that postmitotic, terminally differentiated neurons activate the cell cycle before death. The purpose of this cell cycle activation, however, remains elusive. In proliferating cells, cell cycle machinery is a major contributor to the DNA damage response, which is comprised of growth arrest. In quiescent cells such as terminally differentiated neurons, cell cycle-associated events may also be part of the DNA damage response. A link between DNA damage and repair, cell cycle regulation and cell death is becoming increasingly recognized for cycling cells but remains elusive for quiescent cells. Neurons are particularly susceptible to oxidative stress due to the high rate of oxidative metabolism in the brain and the low level of antioxidant enzymes compared to other somatic tissues. This is supported by fact that the intracellular end point of many neurotoxic stimuli is oxidative stress, which also represents a major cause of the neuropathology underlying a variety of neurodegenerative diseases. DNA is perhaps the major target of oxyradicals. Thus, oxidative stress may cause DNA damage, which is countered by a complex defense mechanism, the DNA damage response, which involves not only the elimination of DNA damage, but its coordination with other cellular processes such as cell-cycle progression, together directing to preserve genomic integrity. The function of such response is the removal of DNA damage by DNA repair pathways, or the elimination of damaged cells via apoptosis. The present review discusses the idea that the cell cycle machinery is a critical element of the DNA damage response not only in cycling, but also quiescent cells, and may bear the same function: to repair the damage or initiate apoptosis if the damage is too extensive to be repaired.