GATA-1 bends DNA in a site-independent fashion

The DNA binding domain of GATA-1 consists of two adjacent homologous zinc fingers, of which only the C-terminal finger binds DNA independently. Solution structure studies have shown that the DNA is bent by about 15 degrees in the complex formed with the single C-terminal finger of GATA-1. The N-terminal finger stabilizes DNA binding at some sites. To determine whether it contributes to DNA bending, we have performed circular permutation DNA bending experiments with a variety of DNA-binding sites recognized by GATA-1. By using a series of full-length GATA-1, double zinc finger, and single C-terminal finger constructs, we show that GATA-1 bends DNA by about 24 degrees, irrespective of the DNA-binding site. We propose that the N- and C-terminal fingers of GATA-1 adopt different orientations when bound to different cognate DNA sites. Furthermore, we characterize circular permutation bending artifacts arising from the reduced gel mobility of the protein-DNA complexes.     

Mechanism of DNA binding by the ADR1 zinc finger transcription factor as determined by SPR

The ADR1 protein recognizes a six base-pair consensus DNA sequence using two zinc fingers and an adjacent accessory motif. Kinetic measurements were performed on the DNA-binding domain of ADR1 using surface plasmon resonance. Binding by ADR1 was characterized to two known native binding sequences from the ADH2 and CTA1 promoter regions, which differ in two of the six consensus positions. In addition, non-specific binding by ADR1 to a random DNA sequence was measured. ADR1 binds the native sites with nanomolar affinities. Remarkably, ADR1 binds non-specific DNA with affinities only approximately tenfold lower than the native sequences. The specific and non-specific binding affinities are conferred mainly by differences in the association phase of DNA binding. The association rate for the complex is strongly influenced by the proximal accessory region, while the dissociation reaction and specificity of binding are controlled by the two zinc fingers. Binding kinetics of two ADR1 mutants was also examined. ADR1 containing an R91K mutation in the accessory region bound with similar affinity to wild-type, but with slightly less sequence specificity. The R91K mutation was observed to increase binding affinity to a suboptimal sequence by decreasing the complex dissociation rate. L146H, a change-of-specificity mutation at the +3 position of the second zinc finger, bound its preferred sequence with a slightly higher affinity than wild-type. The L146H mutant indicates that beneficial protein-DNA contacts provide similar levels of stabilization to the complex, whether they are hydrogen-bonding or van der Waals interactions.     

Structure and DNA binding characteristics of the three‐Cys2His2 domain of mouse testis zinc finger protein

The C‐terminal three‐Cys₂His₂ zinc‐finger domain (TZD) of mouse testis zinc‐finger protein binds to the 5′‐TGTACAGTGT‐3′ at the Aie1 (aurora‐C) promoter with high specificity. Interestingly, the primary sequence of TZD is unique, possessing two distinct linkers, TGEKP and GAAP, and distinct residues at presumed DNA binding sites at each finger, especially finger 3. A K_d value of ～10^?8 M was obtained from surface plasmon resonance analysis for the TZD‐DNA complex. NMR structure of the free TZD showed that each zinc finger forms a typical ββα fold. On binding to DNA, chemical shift perturbations and the R₂ transverse relaxation rate in finger 3 are significantly smaller than those in fingers 1 and 2, which indicates that the DNA binding affinity in finger 3 is weaker. Furthermore, the shift perturbations between TZD in complex with the cognate DNA and its serial mutants revealed that both ADE7 and CYT8, underlined in 5′‐ATATGTACAGTGTTAT‐3′, are critical in specific binding, and the DNA binding in finger 3 is sequence independent. Remarkably, the shift perturbations in finger 3 on the linker mutation of TZD (GAAP mutated to TGEKP) were barely detected, which further indicates that finger 3 does not play a critical role in DNA sequence‐specific recognition. The complex model showed that residues important for DNA binding are mainly located on positions ?1, 2, 3, and 6 of α‐helices in fingers 1 and 2. The DNA sequence and nonsequence‐specific bindings occurring simultaneously in TZD provide valuable information for better understanding of protein–DNA recognition. Proteins 2010. © 2010 Wiley‐Liss, Inc.     

Exploiting the recognition code for elucidating the mechanism of zinc finger protein-DNA interactions

Background

Engineering zinc finger protein motifs for specific binding to double-stranded DNA is critical for targeted genome editing. Most existing tools for predicting DNA-binding specificity in zinc fingers are trained on data obtained from naturally occurring proteins, thereby skewing the predictions. Moreover, these mostly neglect the cooperativity exhibited by zinc fingers.

Methods

Here, we present an ab-initio method that is based on mutation of the key α-helical residues of individual fingers of the parent template for Zif-268 and its consensus sequence (PDB ID: 1AAY). In an attempt to elucidate the mechanism of zinc finger protein-DNA interactions, we evaluated and compared three approaches, differing in the amino acid mutations introduced in the Zif-268 parent template, and the mode of binding they try to mimic, i.e., modular and synergistic mode of binding.

Results

Comparative evaluation of the three strategies reveals that the synergistic mode of binding appears to mimic the ideal mechanism of DNA-zinc finger protein binding. Analysis of the predictions made by all three strategies indicate strong dependence of zinc finger binding specificity on the amino acid propensity and the position of a 3-bp DNA sub-site in the target DNA sequence. Moreover, the binding affinity of the individual zinc fingers was found to increase in the order Finger 1 < Finger 2 < Finger 3, thus confirming the cooperative effect.

Conclusions

Our analysis offers novel insights into the prediction of ZFPs for target DNA sequences and the approaches have been made available as an easy to use web server at http://web.iitd.ac.in/~sundar/zifpredict_ihbe

     

A mutation outside the two zinc fingers of ADR1 can suppress defects in either finger.

A second-site mutation that restored DNA binding to ADR1 mutants altered at different positions in the two zinc fingers was identified. This mutation (called IS1) was a conservative change of arginine 91 to lysine in a region amino terminal to the two zinc fingers and known from previous experiments to be necessary for DNA binding. IS1 increased binding to the UAS1 sequence two- to sevenfold for various ADR1 mutants and twofold for wild-type ADR1. The change of arginine 91 to glycine decreased binding twofold, suggesting that this arginine is involved in DNA binding in the wild-type protein. The increase in binding by IS1 did not involve protein-protein interactions between the two ADR1 monomers, nor did it require the presence of the sequences flanking UAS1. However, the effect of IS1 was influenced by the sequence of the first finger, suggesting that interactions between the region amino terminal to the fingers and the fingers themselves could exist. A model for the role of the amino-terminal region based on these results and sequence homologies with other DNA-binding motifs is proposed.     

Finger-positional change in three zinc finger protein Sp1: influence of terminal finger in DNA recognition

The connection of functional modules is effective for the design of DNA binding molecules with the desired sequence specificity. C(2)H(2)-type zinc finger proteins have a tandemly repeated array structure consisting of independent finger modules and are expected to recognize any DNA sequences by permutation, multi-connection, and the substitution of various sets of zinc fingers. To investigate the effects of the replacement of the terminal finger on the DNA recognition by other fingers, we have constructed the three zinc finger peptides with finger substitution at the N- or C-terminus, Sp1(zf223), Sp1(zf323), and Sp1(zf321). From the results of gel mobility shift assays, each mutant peptide binds preferentially to the target sequence that is predicted if the fingers act in a modular fashion. The methylation interference analyses demonstrate that in the cases of the N-terminal finger substitution mutants, Sp1(zf223) and Sp1(zf323), the N-terminal finger recognizes bases to different extents from that of the wild-type peptide, Sp1(zf123). Of special interest is the fact that the N-terminal finger of the C-terminal finger substitution mutant, Sp1(zf321), shows a distinct base recognition from those of Sp1(zf123) and Sp1(zf323). DNase I footprinting analyses indicate that the C-terminal finger (active finger) induces a conformational change in the DNA in the region for the binding of the N-terminal finger (passive finger). The present results strongly suggest that the extent of base recognition of the N-terminal finger is dominated by the binding of the C-terminal finger. This information provides an important clue for the creation of a zinc finger peptide with the desired specificity, which is applicable to the design of novel drugs and biological tools.     

Keep Your Fingers Off My DNA: Protein–Protein Interactions Mediated by C2H2 Zinc Finger Domains

Cys2-His2 (C2H2) zinc finger domains (ZFs) were originally identified as DNA-binding domains, and uncharacterized domains are typically assumed to function in DNA binding. However, a growing body of evidence suggests an important and widespread role for these domains in protein binding. There are even examples of zinc fingers that support both DNA and protein interactions, which can be found in well-known DNA-binding proteins such as Sp1, Zif268, and Ying Yang 1 (YY1). C2H2 protein–protein interactions (PPIs) are proving to be more abundant than previously appreciated, more plastic than their DNA-binding counterparts, and more variable and complex in their interactions surfaces. Here we review the current knowledge of over 100 C2H2 zinc finger-mediated PPIs, focusing on what is known about the binding surface, contributions of individual fingers to the interaction, and function. An accurate understanding of zinc finger biology will likely require greater insights into the potential protein interaction capabilities of C2H2 ZFs.     

Pentaprobe: a comprehensive sequence for the one-step detection of DNA-binding activities

The rapid increase in the number of novel proteins identified in genome projects necessitates simple and rapid methods for assigning function. We describe a strategy for determining whether novel proteins possess typical sequence-specific DNA-binding activity. Many proteins bind recognition sequences of 5 bp or less. Given that there are 4⁵ possible 5 bp sites, one might expect the length of sequence required to cover all possibilities would be 4⁵ × 5 or 5120 nt. But by allowing overlaps, utilising both strands and using a computer algorithm to generate the minimum sequence, we find the length required is only 516 base pairs. We generated this sequence as six overlapping double-stranded oligonucleotides, termed pentaprobe, and used it in gel retardation experiments to assess DNA binding by both known and putative DNA-binding proteins from several protein families. We have confirmed binding by the zinc finger proteins BKLF, Eos and Pegasus, the Ets domain protein PU.1 and the treble clef N- and C-terminal fingers of GATA-1. We also showed that the N-terminal zinc finger domain of FOG-1 does not behave as a typical DNA-binding domain. Our results suggest that pentaprobe, and related sequences such as hexaprobe, represent useful tools for probing protein function.     

Structural organization of Staf-DNA complexes

The transactivator Staf, which contains seven contiguous zinc fingers of the C₂-H₂ type, exerts its effects on gene expression by binding to specific targets in vertebrate small nuclear RNA (snRNA) and snRNA-type gene promoters. Here, we have investigated the interaction of the Staf zinc finger domain with the optimal Xenopus selenocysteine tRNA (xtRNA^Sec) and human U6 snRNA (hU6) Staf motifs. Generation of a series of polypeptides containing increasing numbers of Staf zinc fingers tested in binding assays, by interference techniques and by binding site selection served to elucidate the mode of interaction between the zinc fingers and the Staf motifs. Our results provide strong evidence that zinc fingers 3–6 represent the minimal zinc finger region for high affinity binding to Staf motifs. Furthermore, we show that the binding of Staf is achieved through a broad spectrum of close contacts between zinc fingers 1–6 and xtRNA^Sec or optimal sites or between zinc fingers 3–6 and the hU6 site. Extensive DNA major groove contacts contribute to the interaction with Staf that associates more closely with the non-template than with the template strand. Based on these findings and the structural information provided by the solved structures of other zinc finger–DNA complexes, we propose a model for the interaction between Staf zinc fingers and the xtRNA^Sec, optimal and hU6 sites.     

Role of Conserved Residues of the WRKY Domain in the DNA-binding of Tobacco WRKY Family Proteins

Four cDNA clones of tobacco that could code for polypeptides with two WRKY domains were isolated. Among four NtWRKYs and other WRKY family proteins, sequence similarity was basically limited to the two WRKY domains. Glutathione S-transferase fusion proteins with the C-terminal WRKY domain of four NtWRKYs bound specifically to the W-box (TTGACC), and the N-terminal WRKY domain showed weaker binding activity with the W-box compared to the C-terminal domain. The DNA-binding activity of the WRKY domain was abolished by o-phenanthroline and this inhibition was recovered specifically by Zn²⁺. Substitution of the conserved cysteine and histidine residues of the plant-specific C₂H₂-type zinc finger-like motif in the WRKY domain abolished the DNA binding. In addition, mutations in the invariable WRKYGQK sequence at the N-terminal side of the zinc finger-like motif also significantly reduced the DNA-binding activity, suggesting that these residues are required for proper folding of the DNA-binding zinc finger.