A unified sampling approach for multipoint analysis of qualitative and quantitative traits in sib pairs

Recent advances in molecular biology have enhanced the opportunity to conduct multipoint mapping for complex diseases. Concurrently, one sees a growing interest in the use of quantitative traits in linkage studies. Here, we present a multipoint sib-pair approach to locate the map position (tau) of a trait locus that controls the observed phenotype (qualitative or quantitative), along with a measure of statistical uncertainty. This method builds on a parametric representation for the expected identical-by-descent statistic at an arbitrary locus, conditional on an event reflecting the sampling scheme, such as affected sib pairs, for qualitative traits, or extreme discordant (ED) sib pairs, for quantitative traits. Our results suggest that the variance about tau&d4;, the estimator of tau, can be reduced by as much as 60%-70% by reducing the length of intervals between markers by one half. For quantitative traits, we examine the precision gain (measured by the variance reduction in tau&d4;) by genotyping extremely concordant (EC) sib pairs and including them along with ED sib pairs in the statistical analysis. The precision gain depends heavily on the residual correlation of the quantitative trait for sib pairs but considerably less on the allele frequency and exact genetic mechanism. Since complex traits involve multiple loci and, hence, the residual correlation cannot be ignored, our finding strongly suggests that one should incorporate EC sib pairs along with ED sib pairs, in both design and analysis. Finally, we empirically establish a simple linear relationship between the magnitude of precision gain and the ratio of the number of ED pairs to the number of EC pairs. This relationship allows investigators to address issues of cost effectiveness that are due to the need for phenotyping and genotyping subjects.     

A score test for the linkage analysis of qualitative and quantitative traits based on identity by descent data from sib-pairs

We propose a general likelihood-based approach to the linkage analysis of qualitative and quantitative traits using identity by descent (IBD) data from sib-pairs. We consider the likelihood of IBD data conditional on phenotypes and test the null hypothesis of no linkage between a marker locus and a gene influencing the trait using a score test in the recombination fraction theta between the two loci. This method unifies the linkage analysis of qualitative and quantitative traits into a single inferential framework, yielding a simple and intuitive test statistic. Conditioning on phenotypes avoids unrealistic random sampling assumptions and allows sib-pairs from differing ascertainment mechanisms to be incorporated into a single likelihood analysis. In particular, it allows the selection of sib-pairs based on their trait values and the analysis of only those pairs having the most informative phenotypes. The score test is based on the full likelihood, i.e. the likelihood based on all phenotype data rather than just differences of sib-pair phenotypes. Considering only phenotype differences, as in Haseman and Elston (1972) and Kruglyak and Lander (1995), may result in important losses in power. The linkage score test is derived under general genetic models for the trait, which may include multiple unlinked genes. Population genetic assumptions, such as random mating or linkage equilibrium at the trait loci, are not required. This score test is thus particularly promising for the analysis of complex human traits. The score statistic readily extends to accommodate incomplete IBD data at the test locus, by using the hidden Markov model implemented in the programs MAPMAKER/SIBS and GENEHUNTER (Kruglyak and Lander, 1995; Kruglyak et al., 1996). Preliminary simulation studies indicate that the linkage score test generally matches or outperforms the Haseman-Elston test, the largest gains in power being for selected samples of sib-pairs with extreme phenotypes.     

A linkage strategy for detection of human quantitative-trait loci. I. Generalized relative risk ratios and power of sib pairs with extreme trait values.

We generalize the concept of the relative risk ratio (lambda) to the case of quantitative traits, to take into account the various trait outcomes of a relative pair. Formulas are derived to express the expected proportions of genes shared identical by descent by a sib pair, in terms of the generalized lambda's for sib pairs (lambda S), parent-offspring pairs (lambda O), and monozygotic twins (lambda M) and in terms of the recombination fraction, with the assumption of no residual correlations. If residual correlations are nonzero among relative pairs, we assume that they are the same among sib pairs, parent-offspring pairs, and monozygotic twins, and we employ a slightly different definition for the generalized lambda so that the same set of formulas still hold. The power (or, the sample size necessary) to detect quantitative-trait loci (QTLs) by use of extreme sib pairs (ESPs) is shown to be a function of the three generalized lambda's. Since lambda M can be derived by use of values of lambda S and lambda O, estimates of the latter two lambda's will suffice for the analysis of power and the necessary sample sizes of ESPs, for a QTL linkage study.     

Complete multipoint sib-pair analysis of qualitative and quantitative traits.

Sib-pair analysis is an increasingly important tool for genetic dissection of complex traits. Current methods for sib-pair analysis are primarily based on studying individual genetic markers one at a time and thus fail to use the full inheritance information provided by multipoint linkage analysis. In this paper, we describe how to extract the complete multipoint inheritance information for each sib pair. We then describe methods that use this information to map loci affecting traits, thereby providing a unified approach to both qualitative and quantitative traits. Specifically, complete multipoint approaches are presented for (1) exclusion mapping of qualitative traits; (2) maximum-likelihood mapping of qualitative traits; (3) information-content mapping, showing the extent to which all inheritance information has been extracted at each location in the genome; and (4) quantitative-trait mapping, by two parametric methods and one nonparametric method. In addition, we explore the effects of marker density, marker polymorphism, and availability of parents on the information content of a study. We have implemented the analysis methods in a new computer package, MAPMAKER/SIBS. With this computer package, complete multipoint analysis with dozens of markers in hundreds of sib pairs can be carried out in minutes.     

A test statistic to detect errors in sib-pair relationships.

Several authors have proposed algorithms to detect Mendelian errors in human genetic linkage data. Most currently available methods use likelihood-based methods on multiplex family data to identify typing or pedigree errors. These algorithms cannot be applied in many sib-pair collections, because of lack of parental-genotype information. Nonetheless, misspecifying the relationships between individuals has serious consequences for sib-pair linkage studies: false relationships bias the statistics designed to identify linkage with disease phenotypes. To test the hypothesis that two individuals are sibs, we propose a test statistic based on the summation, over a large number of genetic markers, of the number of alleles shared identical by state by a pair of individuals, for each marker. The test statistic has an approximately normal distribution under the null hypothesis, and extreme negative values correspond to nonsib pairs. Power and significance studies show that the test statistic calculated by use of 50 unlinked markers has 96% power to detect half-sibs and has 100% power to detect unrelated individuals as not full-sib pairs, with a 5% false-positive rate. Furthermore, extreme positive values of the test statistic identify sibs as MZ twins.     

Linkage analysis of quantitative trait loci: sib pairs or sibships?

Sib pair linkage studies are now widely used to investigate the genetic factors implicated in complex quantitative traits. To increase the power of these approaches, it has been proposed to select extremely discordant (ED) sib pairs which are expected to contain the highest linkage information. However, it is known that sibships of larger size contain more linkage information than independent sib pairs. In this paper we compare, in terms of power and cost considerations, the ED strategy, which uses information on sib pairs only, to the recently developed 'Maximum Likelihood Binomial' sibship-oriented method performed on the whole sibships from which the ED sib pairs have been extracted. We show that the use of these whole sibships is an efficient alternative to approaches focusing on ED sib pairs only.     

Nonparametric longitudinal allele-sharing model

Basically no methods are available for the analysis of quantitative traits in longitudinal genetic epidemiological studies. We introduce a nonparametric factorial design for longitudinal data on independent sib pairs, modelling the phenotypic quadratic differences as the dependent variable. Factors are the number of alleles shared identically by descent (IBD) and the age categories at which the dependent variable is measured, allowing for dependence due to age. To identify a linked marker a rank statistic tests the influence of IBD group on phenotypic quadratic differences. No assumptions are made on normality or variances of the dependent variable. We apply our method to 71 sib pairs from the Framingham Heart Study data provided at the Genetic Analysis Workshop 13. For all 15 available markers on chromosome 17 we analyzed the influence on systolic blood pressure. In addition, different selection strategies to sample from the whole data are discussed.     

Equivalence of single- and multilocus markers: power to detect linkage with composite markers derived from biallelic loci

The reintroduction of biallelic markers, now in the form of single-nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs), has again raised concerns about the practicality of the use of markers with low heterozygosity for genomic screening for complex traits, even if thousands of such markers are available. Like the early blood-group markers (e.g., Rh and MNS), tightly linked biallelic SNPs can be combined into composite markers with heterozygosity similar to that of short-tandem-repeat polymorphisms. The assumptions that underlie the equivalence between single-locus multiallelic and composite markers are presented. We used computer simulation to determine the power of the Haseman-Elston test for linkage with composite markers when not all of these assumptions hold. The Genometric Analysis Simulation Program was used to simulate continuous and discrete traits, one single-locus four-allele marker, and six biallelic markers. We studied composite markers created from pairs, trios, and quartets of biallelic markers in nuclear families and in independent sib pairs. The power to detect linkage with a two-point approach for composite markers and with a multipoint approach that incorporated all six biallelic markers was compared with that for a single-locus, four-allele reference marker. Although the power to detect linkage with a single biallelic marker was considerably less than that of the reference marker, the power to detect linkage with two- and three-locus composite markers was quite similar to that of the reference marker. The power to detect linkage with four-locus composite markers was similar to that of a multipoint approach.     

A novel framework for sib pair linkage analysis

Sib pair linkage analysis of a dichotomous trait is a popular method for narrowing the search for genes that influence complex diseases. Although the pedigree structures are uncomplicated and the underlying genetic principles straightforward, a surprising degree of complexity is involved in implementing a sib pair study and interpreting the results. Ascertainment may be based on affected, discordant, or unaffected sib pairs, as well as on pairs defined by threshold values for quantitative traits, such as extreme discordant sib pairs. To optimize power, various domain restrictions and null hypotheses have been proposed for each of these designs, yielding a wide array of choices for the analyst. To begin, we systematically classify the major sources of discretion in sib pair linkage analysis. Then, we extend the work of Kruglyak and Lander (1995), to bring the various forms into a unified framework and to facilitate a more general approach to the analysis. Finally, we describe a new, freely available computer program, Splat (Sib Pair Linkage Analysis Testing), that can perform any sib pair statistical test currently in use, as well as any user-defined test yet to be proposed. Splat uses the expectation maximization algorithm to calculate maximum-likelihood estimates of sharing (subject to user-specified conditions) and then plots LOD scores versus chromosomal position. It includes a novel grid-scanning capability that enables simultaneous visualization of multiple test statistics. This can lead to further insight into the genetic basis of the disease process under consideration. In addition, phenotype definitions can be modified without the recalculation of inheritance vectors, thereby providing considerable flexibility for exploratory analysis. The application of Splat will be illustrated with data from studies on the genetics of diabetic nephropathy.     

Increasing the power and efficiency of disease-marker case-control association studies through use of allele-sharing information

Case-control disease-marker association studies are often used in the search for variants that predispose to complex diseases. One approach to increasing the power of these studies is to enrich the case sample for individuals likely to be affected because of genetic factors. In this article, we compare three case-selection strategies that use allele-sharing information with the standard strategy that selects a single individual from each family at random. In affected sibship samples, we show that, by carefully selecting sibships and/or individuals on the basis of allele sharing, we can increase the frequency of disease-associated alleles in the case sample. When these cases are compared with unrelated controls, the difference in the frequency of the disease-associated allele is therefore also increased. We find that, by choosing the affected sib who shows the most evidence for pairwise allele sharing with the other affected sibs in families, the test statistic is increased by >20%, on average, for additive models with modest genotype relative risks. In addition, we find that the per-genotype information associated with the allele sharing-based strategies is increased compared with that associated with random selection of a sib for genotyping. Even though we select sibs on the basis of a nonparametric statistic, the additional gain for selection based on the unknown underlying mode of inheritance is minimal. We show that these properties hold even when the power to detect linkage to a region in the entire sample is negligible. This approach can be extended to more-general pedigree structures and quantitative traits.     

Nonparametric simulation-based statistics for detecting linkage in general pedigrees.

We present here four nonparametric statistics for linkage analysis that test whether pairs of affected relatives share marker alleles more often than expected. These statistics are based on simulating the null distribution of a given statistic conditional on the unaffecteds' marker genotypes. Each statistic uses a different measure of marker sharing: the SimAPM statistic uses the simulation-based affected-pedigree-member measure based on identity-by-state (IBS) sharing. The SimKIN (kinship) measure is 1.0 for identity-by-descent (IBD) sharing, 0.0 for no IBD status sharing, and the kinship coefficient when the IBD status is ambiguous. The simulation-based IBD (SimIBD) statistic uses a recursive algorithm to determine the probability of two affecteds sharing a specific allele IBD. The SimISO statistic is identical to SimIBD, except that it also measures marker similarity between unaffected pairs. We evaluated our statistics on data simulated under different two-locus disease models, comparing our results to those obtained with several other nonparametric statistics. Use of IBD information produces dramatic increases in power over the SimAPM method, which uses only IBS information. The power of our best statistic in most cases meets or exceeds the power of the other nonparametric statistics. Furthermore, our statistics perform comparisons between all affected relative pairs within general pedigrees and are not restricted to sib pairs or nuclear families.     

Detection of genes for ordinal traits in nuclear families and a unified approach for association studies

There is growing interest in genomewide association analysis using single-nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs), because traditional linkage studies are not as powerful in identifying genes for common, complex diseases. Tests for linkage disequilibrium have been developed for binary and quantitative traits. However, since many human conditions and diseases are measured in an ordinal scale, methods need to be developed to investigate the association of genes and ordinal traits. Thus, in the current report we propose and derive a score test statistic that identifies genes that are associated with ordinal traits when gametic disequilibrium between a marker and trait loci exists. Through simulation, the performance of this new test is examined for both ordinal traits and quantitative traits. The proposed statistic not only accommodates and is more powerful for ordinal traits, but also has similar power to that of existing tests when the trait is quantitative. Therefore, our proposed statistic has the potential to serve as a unified approach to identifying genes that are associated with any trait, regardless of how the trait is measured. We further demonstrated the advantage of our test by revealing a significant association (P = 0.00067) between alcohol dependence and a SNP in the growth-associated protein 43.     

The effects of selected sampling on the transmission disequilibrium test of a quantitative trait locus

We investigate how sampling of parents or children based on their extreme phenotypic values selected from clinical databases would affect the power of identification of quantitative trait loci (QTL) by a transmission disequilibrium test (TDT). We consider three selective sampling schemes based on the selection of phenotypic values of parents or children in nuclear families: (1) two children, one of extreme value, the other random; (2) two children extremely discordant; (3) one parent of extreme value. Other family members not specified will be recruited randomly with regard to phenotypic values. Our study shows that the second sampling scheme can always enhance the power for QTL identification, sometimes dramatically so. The increase in the statistical power of the TDT is particularly dramatic when h2 at the QTL under test is small or intermediate (e.g. 0.05 or 0.10). For the other two sampling schemes, under dominant effects at the QTL, the power is always increased relative to random sampling; however, under recessive or additive genetic effects, the power gain is generally minor or even decreased a little sometimes. Allele frequencies at the QTL and the selection stringency are important for determining the effect of selective sampling on the power of QTL identification. Our study is useful as a practical guideline on how to perform the TDT efficiently in practice by taking advantage of the extensive databases accumulated that are enriched with people of extreme phenotypic values.     

Use of parents, sibs, and unrelated controls for detection of associations between genetic markers and disease.

Detecting the association between genetic markers and complex diseases can be a critical first step toward identification of the genetic basis of disease. Misleading associations can be avoided by choosing as controls the parents of diseased cases, but the availability of parents often limits this design to early-onset disease. Alternatively, sib controls offer a valid design. A general multivariate score statistic is presented, to detect the association between a multiallelic genetic marker locus and affection status; this general approach is applicable to designs that use parents as controls, sibs as controls, or even unrelated controls whose genotypes do not fit Hardy-Weinberg proportions or that pool any combination of these different designs. The benefit of this multivariate score statistic is that it will tend to be the most powerful method when multiple marker alleles are associated with affection status. To plan these types of studies, we present methods to compute sample size and power, allowing for varying sibship sizes, ascertainment criteria, and genetic models of risk. The results indicate that sib controls have less power than parental controls and that the power of sib controls can be increased by increasing either the number of affected sibs per sibship or the number of unaffected control sibs. The sample-size results indicate that the use of sib controls to test for associations, by use of either a single-marker locus or a genomewide screen, will be feasible for markers that have a dominant effect and for common alleles having a recessive effect. The results presented will be useful for investigators planning studies using sibs as controls.     

The power to detect linkage disequilibrium with quantitative traits in selected samples

Results from power studies for linkage detection have led to many ongoing and planned collections of phenotypically extreme nuclear families. Given the great expense of collecting these families and the imminent availability of a dense diallelic marker map, the families are likely to be used in allelic-association as well as linkage studies. However, optimal selection strategies for linkage may not be equally powerful for association. We examine the power to detect linkage disequilibrium for quantitative traits after phenotypic selection. The results encompass six selection strategies that are in widespread use, including single selection (two designs), affected sib pairs, concordant and discordant pairs, and the extreme-concordant and -discordant design. Selection of sibships on the basis of one extreme proband with high or low trait scores provides as much power as discordant sib pairs but requires the screening and phenotyping of substantially fewer initial families from which to select. Analysis of the role of allele frequencies within each selection design indicates that common trait alleles generally offer the most power, but similarities between the marker- and trait-allele frequencies are much more important than the trait-locus frequency alone. Some of the most widespread selection designs, such as single selection, yield power gains only when both the marker and quantitative trait loci (QTL) are relatively rare in the population. In contrast, discordant pairs and the extreme-proband design provide power for the broadest range of QTL-marker-allele frequency differences. Overall, proband selection from either tail provides the best balance of power, robustness, and simplicity of ascertainment for family-based association analysis.     

A linkage strategy for detection of human quantitative-trait loci. II. Optimization of study designs based on extreme sib pairs and generalized relative risk ratios.

We are concerned here with practical issues in the application of extreme sib-pair (ESP) methods to quantitative traits. Two important factors-namely, the way extreme trait values are defined and the proportions in which different types of ESPs are pooled, in the analysis-are shown to determine the power and the cost effectiveness of a study design. We found that, in general, combining reasonable numbers of both extremely discordant and extremely concordant sib pairs that were available in the sample is more powerful and more cost effective than pursuing only a single type of ESP. We also found that dividing trait values with a less extreme threshold at one end or at both ends of the trait distribution leads to more cost-effective designs. The notion of generalized relative risk ratios (the lambda methods, as described in the first part of this series of two articles) is used to calculate the power and sample size for various choices of polychotomization of trait values and for the combination of different types of ESPs. A balance then can be struck among these choices, to attain an optimum design.     

Composite statistics for QTL mapping with moderately discordant sibling pairs

Extreme discordant sibling-pair (EDSP) designs have been shown in theory to be very powerful for mapping quantitative-trait loci (QTLs) in humans. However, their practical applicability has been somewhat limited by the need to phenotype very large populations to find enough pairs that are extremely discordant. In this paper, we demonstrate that there is also substantial power in pairs that are only moderately discordant, and that designs using moderately discordant pairs can yield a more practical balance between phenotyping and genotyping efforts. The power we demonstrate for moderately discordant pairs stems from a new statistical result. Statistical analysis in discordant-pair studies is generally done by testing for reduced identity by descent (IBD) sharing in the pairs. By contrast, the most commonly-used statistical methods for more standard QTL mapping are Haseman-Elston regression and variance-components analysis. Both of these use statistics that are functions of the trait values given IBD information for the pedigree. We show that IBD sharing statistics and "trait value given IBD" statistics contribute complementary rather than redundant information, and thus that statistics of the two types can be combined to form more powerful tests of linkage. We propose a simple composite statistic, and test it with simulation studies. The simulation results show that our composite statistic increases power only minimally for extremely discordant pairs. However, it boosts the power of moderately discordant pairs substantially and makes them a very practical alternative. Our composite statistic is straightforward to calculate with existing software; we give a practical example of its use by applying it to a Genetic Analysis Workshop (GAW) data set.     

Multilocus linkage analysis of affected sib pairs

OBJECTIVE: The conventional affected sib pair methods evaluate the linkage information at a locus by considering only marginal information. We describe a multilocus linkage method that uses both the marginal information and information derived from the possible interactions among several disease loci, thereby increasing the significance of loci with modest effects. METHODS: Our method is based on a statistic that quantifies the linkage information contained in a set of markers. By a marker selection-reduction process, we screen a set of polymorphisms and select a few that seem linked to disease. RESULTS: We test our approach on genome scan data for inflammatory bowel disease (InfBD) and on simulated data. On real data we detect 6 of the 8 known InfBD loci; on simulated data we obtain improvements in power of up to 40% compared to a conventional single-locus method. CONCLUSION: Our extensive simulations and the results on real data show that our method is in general more powerful than single-locus methods in detecting disease loci responsible for complex traits. A further advantage of our approach is that it can be extended to make use of both the linkage and the linkage disequilibrium between disease loci and nearby markers.     

The quantitative trait linkage disequilibrium test: a more powerful alternative to the quantitative transmission disequilibrium test for use in the absence of population stratification

Linkage analysis based on identity-by-descent allele-sharing can be used to identify a chromosomal region harboring a quantitative trait locus (QTL), but lacks the resolution required for gene identification. Consequently, linkage disequilibrium (association) analysis is often employed for fine-mapping. Variance-components based combined linkage and association analysis for quantitative traits in sib pairs, in which association is modeled as a mean effect and linkage is modeled in the covariance structure has been extended to general pedigrees (quantitative transmission disequilibrium test, QTDT). The QTDT approach accommodates data not only from parents and siblings, but also from all available relatives. QTDT is also robust to population stratification. However, when population stratification is absent, it is possible to utilize even more information, namely the additional information contained in the founder genotypes. In this paper, we introduce a simple modification of the allelic transmission scoring method used in the QTDT that results in a more powerful test of linkage disequilibrium, but is only applicable in the absence of population stratification. This test, the quantitative trait linkage disequilibrium (QTLD) test, has been incorporated into a new procedure in the statistical genetics computer package SOLAR. We apply this procedure in a linkage/association analysis of an electrophysiological measurement previously shown to be related to alcoholism. We also demonstrate by simulation the increase in power obtained with the QTLD test, relative to the QTDT, when a true association exists between a marker and a QTL.     

A unified approach to adjusting association tests for population admixture with arbitrary pedigree structure and arbitrary missing marker information

A general approach to family-based examinations of association between marker alleles and traits is proposed. The approach is based on computing p values by comparing test statistics for association to their conditional distributions given the minimal sufficient statistic under the null hypothesis for the genetic model, sampling plan and population admixture. The approach can be applied with any test statistic, so any kind of phenotype and multi-allelic markers may be examined, and covariates may be included in analyses. By virtue of the conditioning, the approach results in correct type I error probabilities regardless of population admixture, the true genetic model and the sampling strategy. An algorithm for computing the conditional distributions is described, and the results of the algorithm for configurations of nuclear families are presented. The algorithm is applicable with all pedigree structures and all patterns of missing marker allele information.