阴道镜配合病理活检应用于宫颈疾病的诊断价值

目的评价电子阴道镜及宫颈病理活检对宫颈疾病的诊断价值。方法收集我院妇科门诊2003年至2006年宫颈疾病患者行阴道镜检查病行宫颈活检的病理结果进行对照分析。结果电子阴道镜检查后行宫颈活检1060例,病理结果显示:宫颈癌16例,宫颈上皮内瘤样变342例,宫颈炎性病变702例,阴道镜诊断宫颈上皮内瘤样变及宫颈癌的符合率分别为:93.44%和93.75%。结论阴道镜检查配合病理活检诊断宫颈疾病结果及时可靠,尤其对宫颈上皮内瘤样变的早诊断及降低宫颈癌的发生率有重要价值。     

高危型人乳头瘤病毒检测在宫颈病变筛查中的临床意义

目的:探讨高危型人乳头瘤病毒(high-risk human papillomavirus,HR-HPV)检测在宫颈病变筛查中的应用价值.方法:采用液基细胞学(TCT)对1175例妇女宫颈癌及其癌前病变进行初筛,细胞学异常者或TCT正常、HR-HPV DNA阳性且高度怀疑宫颈病变患者进行阴道镜和宫颈多点活检组织病理学检查,结合病理结果分析宫颈病变.用二代杂交捕获法(hybird captureⅡ,HC-Ⅱ)对所有标本进行高危型HPV DNA的检测,对结果进行回顾性分析.结果:1175例样本中TCT检测结果正常或炎症968例,ASC-US(未明确诊断意义的不典型鳞状上皮细胞)62例,ASC-H(不典型鳞状上皮细胞,不能除外高度鳞状上皮内病变)39例,LSIL(低度鳞状上皮内病变)87例,HSIL(高度鳞状上皮内病变)19例.207例细胞学异常者经阴道镜下多点组织活检证实炎症116例,宫颈上皮内瘤变(CIN)Ⅰ级27例,Ⅱ级34例,Ⅲ级19例,浸润癌5例,湿疣6例.HC-Ⅱ法检测HR-HPV DNA发现207例细胞学异常者HPV感染率分别为:正常或炎症17.24%,CIN I 22.22%,CIN Ⅱ32.35%,CIN Ⅲ61.39%,浸润癌100.10%,湿疣30.23%.82例TCT正常、HR-HPV DNA阳性患者病理结果显示炎症67例,CIN Ⅰ 11例,CIN Ⅱ 6例.结论:随着病变的加重,HR-HPV感染率逐渐增高,其感染与宫颈病变级别相关,HR-HPV检测可辅助筛查宫颈病变,与细胞学联合检测为较好的宫颈癌筛查方案.     

50例非典型腺细胞病理结果分析

目的:分析宫颈细胞学诊断为非典型腺细胞(AGC)病例的病理结果,探讨AGC诊断的临床意义。方法:通过宫颈细胞学的检查对非典型腺细胞病例的宫颈组织病理检查进行归纳分析。结果:50例病例中宫颈炎19例,CINⅠ14例;CINⅡ6例;CINⅢ9例,其中1例累及腺体;宫颈鳞状细胞癌2例。结论:AGC的诊断常提示宫颈上皮内瘤样病变,同时对于细胞学诊断AGC的病例的病人进行跟踪随访并进行规范化临床处理。     

阴道镜及宫颈活组织检查对早期宫颈上皮内瘤变诊断价值分析

目的:探究阴道镜及宫颈活组织检查对早期宫颈上皮内瘤变(cervicalintraepithelialneoplasia,CIN)的诊断价值。方法:选择2015年3月至2018年5月于我院接受诊治的543例疑似宫颈上皮瘤变患者,分别对其实施阴道镜及宫颈活组织检查,以病理学检测结果为金标准,分别评估两种方式单独检测及联合检测对早期CIN的诊断一致性、灵敏度和特异度,并进行组间对比。结果:(1)543例疑似CIN患者病理诊断早期CIN阳性患者168例,阴性患者375例,诊断率为30.94%;阴道镜对早期CIN诊断发现阳性患者有143例,良性患者有400例,诊断率为26.34%;宫颈活组织检测对早期CIN诊断发现阳性患者有159例,良性患者有384例,诊断率为29.28%;阴道镜联合颈活组织检测对早期CIN诊断发现阳性患者有163例,良性患者有380例,诊断率为30.02%。(2)检测发现,阴道镜对早期CIN诊断一致性为81.77%,灵敏度为60.12%,特异度为91.47%。(3)宫颈活组织对早期CIN诊断一致性为91.71%,灵敏度为83.33%,特异度为95.47%。(4)阴道镜联合宫颈活组织对早期CIN诊断一致性为96.50%,灵敏度为92.86%,特异度为98.13%。(5)联合检测对早期CIN诊断的一致性、灵敏度和特异度均明显优于阴道镜及宫颈活组织单独检测。结论:阴道镜及宫颈活组织检测对早期CIN具有较好的诊断效果,但联合检测诊断准确率更高,适用于早期CIN临床筛查中。     

液基细胞、HPV检测与阴道镜宫颈癌的筛查方面的应用研究

目的:探讨液基薄层细胞学检查、HPV-DNA检测、阴道镜检查在宫颈癌早期诊断中的临床应用价值.方法:回顾性分析92例宫颈液基薄层细胞学检查未能明确诊断意义的宫颈非典型鳞状细胞病变患者,进行HPV-DNA检测与阴道镜检查,将检测的结果进行对比研究.结果:阴道镜与宫颈液基薄层细胞检查(TCT)及HPV检测在宫颈上皮内瘤变的灵敏度相比,差异有统计学意义(P＜0.05),阴道镜的检出率最高.随着TCT结果的病变级别提高,HPV感染率也提高,ASCUS组与LSIL组之间差异有统计学意义(P＜0.05).ASCUS、LSIL、HSIL病理活检的阳性率差异明显(P＜0.05),有统计学意义.宫颈的不同病变年龄主要集中在31-50岁之间.结论:宫颈液基薄层细胞学检查异常的患者,应进行HPV检测及阴道镜下活检,三步筛查法可大幅度提高宫颈高度病变的检出率,并且30-50岁的女性应定期做宫颈细胞学检查、HPV检测及阴道镜检查.     

高危型HPV-DNA检测对宫颈病变的诊断价值

目的:评价高危型人类乳头瘤病毒(high-risk human papilloma virus,HR-HPV)DNA检测对宫颈病变的诊断价值.方法:对门诊450例细胞学异常的患者,采用杂交捕获试验法(Hybrid Capture Ⅱ,HCⅡ)检测HR-HPV-DNA,并行阴道镜检查.结果:细胞学诊断中非典型鳞状细胞332例,低度鳞状上皮内病变87例,高度鳞状上皮内病变31例,HPV-DNA阳性率分别为30.7%(102/332),44.8%(39/87),90.3%(28/31);病理学诊断中无上皮内病变或恶性病变、子宫颈上皮瘤(cervical intra-qaithelial neoplasia,CIN)Ⅰ/Ⅱ、CIN Ⅲ和原位癌HPV-DNA阳性率分别为31.2%(73/219)、47.3%(96/203)、100%(28/28),随细胞学检查的级别增高,HPV-DNA高危型阳性率增加(P＜0.05).结论:高危型HPV-DNA检测是宫颈癌筛查的有效方法,建议临床推广应用.     

宫颈液基细胞学检测筛查宫颈病变2445例分析

目的：采用液基细胞学检测（TCT）方法,探讨其在妇科宫颈病变细胞学筛查中的临床应用价值。方法：选择我院2007年1月-2008年12月接受宫颈病变筛查的患者2445例,收集宫颈脱落细胞,采用TCT技术检测,细胞学分类采用TBS分类标准诊断,对细胞学检查阳性者行阴道镜指引下多点活检,将细胞学检查结果与活检结果作对比分析。结果：2445例受检者中细胞学阳性病例196例,阳性检出率8.02%。其中非典型鳞状细胞（ASCUS）占5.8%;低度鳞状上皮内病变（LSIL）占1.5%;高度鳞状上皮内病变（HSIL）占0.6%;鳞癌（SCC）占0.1%。阳性病例阴道镜下活检结果与细胞学检查结果符合。结论：TCT检查能准确反映宫颈病变情况,在妇科宫颈病变筛查中有较高的临床应用价值,可作为临床宫颈癌普查方法。     

TCT、阴道镜下活检和LEEP对CIN诊断价值的比较

目的：评价TCT检查、阴道镜活检和LEEP活检在宫颈上皮内瘤变（ClN）诊断中的价值,比较其差异。方法：对324例经TCT加阴道镜下活检诊断为CIN的患者进一步行LEEP,采用对比研究TCT、阴道镜下活检和IEEP活检病理结果。结果：TCT检查与阴道镜活检诊断结果的完全符合率为65．1％,TCT结果与LEEP活检病理学诊断结果的完全符合率为69．4％,诊断过度11．4％,诊断不足18．5％。阴道镜下宫颈活检结果与LEEP活检病理学诊断结果的完全符合率为68．2％,诊断过度21．9％,诊断不足9-3％,后两种方法的诊断结果差异有统计学意义（P〈O．01）。结论：TCT是辅助诊断CIN的有效方法;单独阴道镜下活检诊断CIN的准确性尚不够理想,阴道镜下活检不能替代LEEP活检;TCT诊断CIN者在初次治疗时可用LEEP一次完成诊断和治疗。     

宫颈液基超薄细胞学检查临床应用价值探讨

目的探讨宫颈液基超薄细胞学检查（Thinp rep cytologic,TCT）和Bethesda系统（TBS）在宫颈病变诊断中的临床价值。方法对3146例本院宫颈疾病就诊者行TCT检查和TBS细胞学分类诊断,对TCT检查异常者进行阴道镜病理检查。结果异常涂片208例（占6．61％）,其中不典型鳞状细胞（ASC）68例（2．19％）,低度鳞状上皮内瘤变（LSIL）95例（3．02％）高度鳞状上皮内瘤变（HSIL）41例（1．31％）。鳞状细胞癌（SCC）4例（0．12％）。异常细胞涂片30-39岁80例（38．1％）,40—49岁55例（26．12％）,与其他年龄组比较差异有统计学意义（P〈0．05）。TCT检查与病理检查符合率分别为LSIL81％,HSIL92％,SCC100％,两者比较差异无统计学意义。结论TCT结合TBS应用于宫颈细胞涂片配合阴道镜活检,是筛查和诊断宫颈癌前病变的可靠手段。     

阴道镜检查在宫颈病变诊断中的价值

目的：探究阴道镜在宫颈病变诊断中的临床价值,为宫颈病变的临床诊断提供理论依据。方法：采用随机数字袁法将226例患者分为两组,对照组行常规检查后再行病理活检,观察组行阴道镜检查后再行病理活检,比较两组的检查结果,探讨阴道镜的诊断效果。结果：观察组的病理活检阳性检出率高于对照组,P〈0．05,临床检查结果为观察组检查的敏感度、特异度和准确率均高于对照组,P〈0．05。结论：阴道镜对子宫颈病变的临床诊断具有不可替代的作用,且阴道镜的检查具有无创性、可重复性,能够动态反映患者的病情,已成为防治子宫颈癌变的重要方式之一,同时在一定程度上提高了病理活检的阳性率,联合检查可显著提高CIN和宫颈癌早期的诊断水平,减少误漏诊,为临床治疗宫颈病变提供了可靠的依据,值得临床推广。     

Comparative study of cytology and punch biopsy in cervical intraepithelial neoplasia during pregnancy. A preliminary report

To elucidate the accuracy of cytology in diagnosing cervical intraepithelial neoplasia (CIN) during pregnancy, cytologic screenings for uterine cervical cancer in pregnant women were reviewed for a five-year period. Of the 967 pregnant women screened, abnormal cytologic findings were recorded for 15 (1.6%). Only nine of these were subsequently examined by colposcopy and punch biopsy, which demonstrated CIN in all cases, for an incidence of documented CIN during pregnancy of 0.93%. Including two referral cases also examined by colposcopy and biopsy, cytology and histology agreed on the degree of CIN in four cases and disagreed by one degree in four cases, by two degrees in two cases and by three degrees (mild dysplasia versus carcinoma in situ) in one case. Review of the specimens from these cases did not readily explain the poor concordance between cytology and punch biopsy; some findings suggest that overestimation of the punch biopsy sample may be the explanation.     

Cervical screening: management of patients referred for colposcopy with smear abnormalities less severe than dyskaryosis

The cervical smear and biopsy results were reviewed for 141 patients who were referred for colposcopy with either a technically unsuitable smear or with cervical smear abnormalities less severe than dyskaryosis. The number of referrals due to minor smear abnormalities more than doubled from 8.6% to 22.3% of the total colposcopy referrals over the 4 year period studied. The minor smear abnormalities were only associated with cervical intraepithelial neoplasia (CIN) in patients aged <50 years. In 19 (13.5%) of the 141 patients high-grade lesions (CIN II or CIN III) were diagnosed. There were no cases of invasive cancer. Furthermore, the increased number of patients being referred for colposcopy with minor cervical smear abnormalities highlights the increasing pressures on colposcopy services, with prolonged waiting times for all patients.     

The role of cervical cytology and colposcopy in detecting cervical glandular neoplasia

Objective:  To determine the role of cervical cytology and colposcopy in the management of endocervical neoplasia.
Setting:  Colposcopy unit and cytology laboratory in a teaching hospital.
Sample:  Group 1 included 184 smears showing endocervical glandular neoplasia from 129 patients and group 2 included 101 patients with histology showing endocervical abnormalities in a 6-year period (1993–1998). Follow-up of 6–11 years to 2004 was available.
Methods:  Group 1 were identified from the cytology computer records. Group 2 were identified from histology records on the cytology database and a record of histology cases kept for audit purposes. The clinical records were examined retrospectively.
Results:  The positive predictive value (PPV) of abnormal endocervical cells in smears was 81.1% for significant glandular/squamous [cervical glandular intraepithelial neoplasia (CGIN)/cervical intraepithelial neoplasia grade2 (CIN2 or worse)] lesions. The PPV of colposcopy was 93.5% for significant glandular/squamous lesions of the cervix. The postcolposcopy probability of a significant lesion when colposcopy was normal was 87.5%. The sensitivity of colposcopy in detecting endocervical lesions was 9.8%. The sensitivity of cervical smears in detecting a significant endocervical abnormality (CGIN or worse) was 66.3%. The false negative rate for cytology of endocervical glandular lesions was 4.0%.
Conclusions:  Endocervical glandular neoplasia detected on cytology is predictive of significant cervical pathology even when colposcopy is normal, which supports excisional biopsy in the primary assessment of these smears. The high concomitant squamous abnormality rate justifies the use of colposcopy to direct biopsies from the ectocervix. Cervical cytology is the only current screening method for cervical glandular abnormalities but sensitivity is poor.     

变异性分化抗原簇44（CD44v17）对宫颈癌的临床诊断意义

目的:探讨CD44v17对宫颈癌的临床诊断意义。方法:将CD44v17si RNA、CD44v17、生理盐水转染至传代后的人宫颈癌细胞。检测细胞转染后存活率;检测细胞凋亡率。在裸鼠左肩背部注入人宫颈癌细胞悬液,随机分为CD44v17组、CD44v17si RNA组、对照组。在CD44v17组、CD44v17si RNA组裸鼠瘤体内分别注入CD44v17病毒颗粒、CD44v17si RNA病毒颗粒。检测瘤体的质量与体积。选取疑有宫颈病变患者阴道镜下活检组织80例,正常宫颈组织15例、宫颈上皮内瘤变(CIN)I级组织l5例、CIN II级15例、CIN III级组织15例和宫颈癌组织20例。检测CD44v17在不同组织中的表达量。结果:CD44v17si RNA转染的宫颈癌细胞凋亡率(19.20±2.14%)高于CD44v17转染的宫颈癌细胞凋亡率(6.13±1.08%)(P0.05)。CD44v17组裸鼠瘤体质量(15.9±3.4)g高于对照组裸鼠瘤体质量(11.8±2.7)g(P0.05)。CD44v17在不同组织中的表达量,按正常宫颈、CINⅠ级、CINⅡ级、CINⅢ级、宫颈癌发展过程呈递增趋势(P0.05)。结论:CD44v17能抑制宫颈癌细胞凋亡,促进宫颈癌细胞的生长、增殖。通过降低CD44v17表达量可能是遏制CIN向宫颈癌发展的一个手段。     

A study to determine the underlying reason for abnormal glandular cytology and the formulation of a management protocol

A retrospective review is presented of 89 patients with glandular dyskaryosis in order to formulate a management protocol. Fifteen patients had cervical intraepithelial neoplasia (CIN) without glandular abnormality (17%). One patient had adenocarcinoma in situ of the cervix and one patient had vaginal intraepithelial neoplasia (VAIN) grade III. Twenty‐two patients had endometrial carcinoma (24.5%) and 11 patients had cervical carcinoma (12.5%). Of the patients presenting with post‐menopausal bleeding as well as having glandular dyskaryosis, 69% had a gynaecological malignancy. In conclusion, colposcopy and out‐patient endometrial sampling are recommended in all cases. Patients with abnormal endometrial sampling require hysteroscopy. Cone biopsy is necessary to exclude occult glandular disease if cytology remains abnormal despite negative colposcopy and sampling.     

Improving the sensitivity of cervical cytologic screening. A comparison of duplicate smears and colposcopic examination of patients with cytologic inflammatory epithelial changes

During a ten-month period, 264 cervical cytologic specimens were submitted in duplicate to two separate cytology laboratories. An attempt was made to perform colposcopy on all 45 patients reported as having an abnormality by either laboratory. All but one patient with a cytologic diagnosis of cervical intraepithelial neoplasia (CIN) underwent colposcopy, as did 68% of the patients with a diagnosis of nondysplastic atypia (inflammatory epithelial changes [IEC]). Five cases of histologically verified CIN were found by colposcopic study of patients with a cytologic diagnosis of CIN; two additional cases were found by colposcopic study of patients with a cytologic diagnosis of IEC. On the assumption that patients not colposcoped were not systematically different from the others with IEC, the screening sensitivities for both laboratories and for cytology followed by colposcopy of IEC cases were estimated. A statistically significant improvement in screening sensitivity was achieved by colposcopic examination of patients with IEC. This conclusion was tempered by a Bayesian analysis that suggested that some of the apparent improved sensitivity could be due to falsely positive biopsy reports. Despite potential benefits, it is premature to recommend universal colposcopic examination of patients with cytologic reports of inflammatory epithelial changes.     

Assessment of the Accuracy of Cytology In Women Referred For Colposcopy and Biopsy: the Results of a 1 Year Audit

The results of weekly colposcopy review meetings have been audited for 1 year and cases where there was a discrepancy between the referral cervical smear and the initial colposcopy biopsy have been analysed. New referrals (n = 476) for colposcopy were studied. In the final outcome 80% of 326 women referred for moderate or severe dyskaryosis were found to have cervical intraepithelial neoplasia (CIN) grade II or III or invasive carcinoma. Three women found to have invasive carcinoma had been referred for severely dyskaryotic smears. Twenty women were referred for smears with cell changes suggesting glandular neoplasia: five were found to have adenocarcinoma in situ, whereas eight had CIN and seven had negative biopsies. The results justify the referral policy and demonstrate the need for further investigation when initial colposcopic biopsies are negative.     

Sensitivity of the Pap test in detecting high grade lesions: what should be the acceptable cytologic threshold for colposcopic referral?

OBJECTIVE: To devise an optimal cytology threshold for colposcopy referral in resource-limited settings. STUDY DESIGN: Four hundred seventy-two symptomatic women 20-60 years old were screened by both cytology and colposcopy. Onsite biopsy was taken if lesions grade 1 or above were detected on colposcopy. Women found to have cervical intraepithelial neoplasia (CIN) 2 and above lesions on histopathology were stratified according to their cytologic diagnosis (atypical squamous cells of undetermined significance [ASCUS]+ threshold, low grade squamous intraepithelial lesion [LSIL]+ threshold, and high grade squamous intraepithelial lesion [HSIL]+ threshold). The comparative sensitivity, specificity and predictive values in each group were calculated, taking biopsy as the gold standard. RESULTS: The sensitivity of LSIL + cytology to detect CIN 2+ lesions was 91.5% (referral load, 30.7%). While the sensitivity of ASCUS+ cytology threshold was almost the same (92.3%), the referral load was much higher (42.2%). With HSIL+ cytology threshold, though the referral load was reduced substantially (21.9%), the sensitivity also decreased, to 81.5%. CONCLUSION: The results indicate that in order to achieve high sensitivity, the LSIL cytology threshold appears to be optimum for colposcopic referrals.