Surgivisio® and O-arm®O2 cone beam CT mobile systems for guidance of lumbar spine surgery: Comparison of patient radiation dose

PurposeTo compare patient radiation doses in cone beam computed tomography (CBCT) of two mobile systems used for navigation-assisted mini-invasive orthopedic surgery: O-arm®O2 and Surgivisio®.MethodsThe study focused on imaging of the spine. Thermoluminescent dosimeters were used to measure organs and effective doses (ED) during CBCT. An ionization-chamber and a solid-state sensor were used to measure the incident air-kerma (K_i) at the center of the CBCT field-of-view and K_i during 2D-imaging, respectively. The PCXMC software was used to calculate patient ED in 2D and CBCT configurations. The image quality in CBCT was evaluated with the CATPHAN phantom.ResultsThe experimental ED estimate for the low-dose 3D-modes was 2.41 and 0.35 mSv with O-arm®O2 (Low Dose 3D-small-abdomen) and Surgivisio® (3DSU-91 images), respectively. PCXMC results were consistent: 1.54 and 0.30 mSv. Organ doses were 5 to 12 times lower with Surgivisio®. K_i at patient skin were comparable on lateral 2D-imaging (0.5 mGy), but lower with O-arm®O2 on anteroposterior (0.3 versus 0.9 mGy). Both systems show poor low contrast resolution and similar high contrast spatial resolution (7 line-pairs/cm).ConclusionsThis study is the first to evaluate patient ED and organ doses with Surgivisio®. A significant difference in organs doses was observed between the CBCT systems. The study demonstrates that Surgivisio® used on spine delivers approximately five to six times less patient ED, compared to O-arm®O2, in low dose 3D-modes. Doses in 2D-mode preceding CBCT were higher with Surgivisio®, but negligible compared to CBCT doses under the experimental conditions tested.     

Organ doses from a proton gantry-mounted cone-beam computed tomography system characterized with MCNP6 and GATE

PurposeTo determine organ doses from a proton gantry-mounted cone-beam computed tomography (CBCT) system using two Monte Carlo codes and to study the influence on organ doses from different acquisition modes and repeated imaging.MethodsThe CBCT system was characterized with MCNP6 and GATE using measurements of depth doses in water and spatial profiles in air. The beam models were validated against absolute dose measurements and used to simulate organ doses from CBCT imaging with head, thorax and pelvis protocols. Anterior and posterior 190° scans were simulated and the resulting organ doses per mAs were compared to those from 360° scans. The influence on organ doses from repeated imaging with different imaging schedules was also investigated.ResultsThe agreement between MCNP6, GATE and measurements with regard to depth doses and beam profiles was within 4% for all protocols and the corresponding average agreement in absolute dose validation was 4%. Absorbed doses for in-field organs from 360° scans ranged between 6 and 8 mGy, 15–17 mGy and 24–54 mGy for the head, thorax and pelvis protocols, respectively. Cumulative organ doses from repeated CBCT imaging ranged between 0.04 and 0.32 Gy for weekly imaging and 0.2–1.6 Gy for daily imaging. The anterior scans resulted in an average increase in dose per mAs of 24% to the organs of interest relative to the 360° scan, while the posterior scan showed a 37% decrease.ConclusionsA proton gantry-mounted CBCT system was accurately characterized with MCNP6 and GATE. Organ doses varied greatly depending on acquisition mode, favoring posterior scans.     

Abdominal imaging dose in radiology and radiotherapy – Phantom point dose measurements,effective dose and secondary cancer risk

PurposeTo compare abdominal imaging dose from 3D imaging in radiology (standard/low-dose/dual-energy CT) and radiotherapy (planning CT, kV cone-beam CT (CBCT)).MethodsDose was measured by thermoluminescent dosimeters (TLD’s) placed at 86 positions in an anthropomorphic phantom. Point, organ and effective dose were assessed, and secondary cancer risk from imaging was estimated.ResultsOverall dose and mean organ dose comparisons yield significantly lower dose for the optimized radiology protocols (dual-source and care kV), with an average dose of 0.34±0.01 mGy and 0.54±0.01 mGy (average ± standard deviation), respectively. Standard abdominal CT and planning CT involve considerably higher dose (13.58 ± 0.18 mGy and 18.78±0.27 mGy, respectively). The CBCT dose show a dose fall-off near the field edges. On average, dose is reduced as compared with the planning or standard CT (3.79 ± 0.21 mGy for 220° rotation and 7.76 ± 0.37 mGy for 360°), unless the high-quality setting is chosen (20.30 ± 0.96 mGy). The mean organ doses show a similar behavior, which translates to the estimated secondary cancer risk. The modelled risk is in the range between 0.4 cases per million patient years (PY) for the radiological scans dual-energy and care kV, and 300 cases per million PY for the high-quality CBCT setting.ConclusionsModern radiotherapy imaging techniques (while much lower in dose than radiotherapy), involve considerably more dose to the patient than modern radiology techniques. Given the frequency of radiotherapy imaging, a further reduction in radiotherapy imaging dose appears to be both desirable and technically feasible.     

Two examples of indication specific radiation dose calculations in dental CBCT and Multidetector CT scanners

PurposeTo calculate organ doses and estimate the effective dose for justification purposes in patients undergoing orthognathic treatment planning purposes and temporal bone imaging in dental cone beam CT (CBCT) and Multidetector CT (MDCT) scanners.MethodsThe radiation dose to the ICRP reference male voxel phantom was calculated for dedicated orthognathic treatment planning acquisitions via Monte Carlo simulations in two dental CBCT scanners, Promax 3D Max (Planmeca, FI) and NewTom VGi evo (QR s.r.l, IT) and in Somatom Definition Flash (Siemens, DE) MDCT scanner. For temporal bone imaging, radiation doses were calculated via MC simulations for a CBCT protocol in NewTom 5G (QR s.r.l, IT) and with the use of a software tool (CT-expo) for Somatom Force (Siemens, DE). All procedures had been optimized at the acceptance tests of the devices.ResultsFor orthognathic protocols, dental CBCT scanners deliver lower doses compared to MDCT scanners. The estimated effective dose (ED) was 0.32 mSv for a normal resolution operation mode in Promax 3D Max, 0.27 mSv in VGi-evo and 1.18 mSv in the Somatom Definition Flash. For temporal bone protocols, the Somatom Force resulted in an estimated ED of 0.28 mSv while for NewTom 5G the ED was 0.31 and 0.22 mSv for monolateral and bilateral imaging respectively.ConclusionsTwo clinical exams which are carried out with both a CBCT or a MDCT scanner were compared in terms of radiation dose. Dental CBCT scanners deliver lower doses for orthognathic patients whereas for temporal bone procedures the doses were similar.     

Dosimetric assessment of the exposure of radiotherapy patients due to cone-beam CT procedures

Cone-beam computed tomography (CBCT) is widely used for pre-treatment verification and patient setup in image-guided radiation therapy (IGRT). CBCT imaging is employed daily and several times per patient, resulting in potentially high cumulative imaging doses to healthy tissues that surround exposed target organs. Computed tomography dose index (CTDI) is the parameter used by CBCT equipment as indication of the radiation output to patients. This study aimed to increase the knowledge on the relation between CBCT organ doses and weighted CTDI (CTDI_W) for a thorax scanning protocol. A CBCT system was modelled using the Monte Carlo (MC) radiation transport program MCNPX2.7.0. Simulation results were validated against half-value layer (HVL), axial beam profile, patient skin dose (PSD) and CTDI measurements. For organ dose calculations, a male voxel phantom (“Golem”) was implemented with the CBCT scanner computational model. After a successful MC model validation with measurements, a systematic comparison was performed between organ doses (and their distribution) and CTDI dosimetry concepts [CTDI_W and cumulative dose quantities f₁₀₀(150) and \({\text{CTD}}{{\text{I}}_\infty }\)]. The results obtained show that CBCT organ doses vary between 1.2 ± 0.1 mGy and 3.3 ± 0.2 mGy for organs located within the primary beam. It was also verified that CTDI_W allows prediction of absorbed doses to tissues at distances of about 5 cm from the isocentre of the CBCT system, whereas f₁₀₀(150) allows prediction of organ doses at distances of about 10 cm from the isocentre, independently from its location. This study demonstrates that these dosimetric concepts are suitable methods that easily allow a good approximation of the additional CBCT imaging doses during a typical lung cancer IGRT treatment.

     

A multicenter dosimetry study to evaluate the imaging dose from Elekta XVI and Varian OBI kV-CBCT systems to cardiovascular implantable electronic devices (CIEDs)

The increasing use of daily CBCT in radiotherapy has raised concerns about the additional dose delivered to the patient, and it can also become a concern issue for those patients with cardiovascular implantable electronic devices (CIEDs) (Pacemaker [PM] and Implantable Cardioverter Defibrillator [ICD]). Although guidelines highly recommend that the cumulative dose received by CIEDs should be kept as low as possible, and a safe threshold based on patient risk classification needs to be respected, this additional imaging dose is not usually considered. Four centers with different dosimetry systems and different CBCT imaging protocols participated in this multicenter study to investigate the imaging dose to the CIEDs from Elekta XVI and Varian OBI kV-CBCT systems. It was found that although imaging doses received by CIEDs outside the CBCT field are negligible, special attention should be paid to this value when CIEDs are inside the field because the daily use of CBCT can sometimes contribute considerably to the total dose received by a CIED.     

Investigating in-field and out-of-field neutron contamination in high-energy medical linear accelerators based on the treatment factors of field size,depth, beam modifiers,and beam type

PurposeWe analysed the effects of field size, depth, beam modifier and beam type on the amount of in-field and out-of-field neutron contamination for medical linear accelerators (linacs).MethodsMeasurements were carried out for three high-energy medical linacs of Elekta Synergy Platform, Varian Clinac DHX High Performance and Philips SL25 using bubble detectors. The photo-neutron measurements were taken in the first two linacs with 18 MV nominal energy, whereas the electro-neutrons were measured in the three linacs with 9 MeV, 10 MeV, 15 MeV and 18 MeV.ResultsThe central neutron doses increased with larger field sizes as a dramatic drop off was observed in peripheral areas. Comparing with the jaws-shaped open-field of 10 × 10 cm, the motorised and physical wedges contributed to neutron contamination at central axis by 60% and 18%, respectively. The similar dose increment was observed in MLC-shaped fields. The contributions of MLCs were in the range of 55–59% and 19–22% in Elekta and Varian linacs comparing with 10 × 10 and 20 × 20 cm open fields shaped by the jaws, respectively. The neutron doses at shallow depths were found to be higher than the doses found at deeper regions. The electro-neutron dose at the 18 MeV energy was higher than the doses at the electron energies of 15 MeV and 9 MeV by a factor of 3 and 50, respectively.ConclusionThe photo- and electro-neutron dose should be taken into consideration in the radiation treatment with high photon and electron energies.     

Conversion factors for effective dose and organ doses with the air Kerma area product in hysterosalpingography

Histerosalpingography (HSG) remains the dominant diagnostic tool for investigation of infertility in women. Conversion factors used to estimate effective (E) and organ doses (H_T) from air Kerma area product (KAP) are needed to estimate patient doses in HSG, performed with state-of-the-art fluoroscopic X-ray systems with digital detectors.In this study, estimates of E and H_T for six critical organs/tissues, were derived on an individual basis in 120 HSG procedures and in 1410 irradiation events, performed on two X-ray systems from information available through the radiation dose structured report using Monte Carlo methods.Mean values of E and H_ovaries were1.0 ± 0.9 mSv and 5.6 ± 5.4 mGy. E/KAP conversion factors of 0.13; 0.18; 0.28 and 0.35 mSv Gy⁻¹cm⁻² were established for irradiation events with a Cu filtration of 0.0; 0.1; 0.4 and 0.9 mm. A high agreement was obtained between E estimated through Monte Carlo methods and E/KAP conversion factors accounting separately for the different modes of fluoroscopy and the radiography component of HSG, with a systematic error of 0 mSv and lower/upper limits of agreement of −0.6 and 0.5 mSv. On the contrary, the use of a single coefficient of conversion did not provide accurate estimates of E, showing a bias of −0.4 mSv and lower and upper limits of agreement of −1.9 and 1.2 mSv.An algorithm for the estimation of effective and organ doses from KAP has been established in HSG procedures depending on the Cu filtration in the X-ray irradiation events.     

Incident air kerma to absorbed organ dose conversion factors for breast and lung in PA thorax radiography: The effect of patient thickness and radiation quality

PurposeConverting the measurable quantities to patient organ doses in projection radiography is usually based on a standard-sized patient model and a specific radiation quality, which are likely to differ from the real situation. Large inaccuracies can therefore be obtained in organ doses, because organ doses are dependent on the exposure parameters, exposure geometry and patient anatomy. In this study, the effect of radiation quality and patient thickness on the organ dose conversion factors were determined.MethodsIn this study, the posterior–anterior projection radiograph of the thorax was selected in order to determine the effect of radiation quality (tube voltages of 70–130 kV and total filtrations of 3 mmAl to 4 mmAl + 0.2 mmCu) and patient thickness (anterior–posterior thicknesses of 19.4–30.8 cm) on the breast and lung dose conversion factors. For this purpose, Monte Carlo simulation programs ImpactMC and PCXMC were used with computed tomography examination data of adult male and female patients and mathematical hermaphrodite phantoms, respectively.ResultsCompared to the reference beam quality and patient thickness, the relative variation range in organ dose conversion factors was up to 74% for different radiation qualities and 122% for different patient thicknesses.ConclusionsConversion factors should only be used with comprehensive understanding of the exposure conditions, considering the exposure parameters, exposure geometry and patient anatomy they are valid for. This study demonstrates that patient thickness-specific and radiation quality-specific conversion factors are needed in projection radiography.     

Split-bolus computed tomography urography (CTU) achieves more than half of radiation dose reduction in females and overweight patients than conventional single-bolus computed tomography urography

ObjectiveTo compare radiation dose between single-bolus and split-bolus computed tomography urography (CTU).Materials and methodsWe prospectively enrolled patients undergoing single-bolus and split-bolus CTU from 2019 June to 2020 June. The age, sex and body mass index (BMI) of each patient was recorded and categorized into BMI classes. The radiation dose indices including volumetric computed dose index, size-specific dose estimate, dose length product and effective dose of each patient were compared between 2 CTU groups with calculation of dose reduction proportions (DRPs).ResultsSeventy-six patients underwent single-bolus (n = 39) and split-bolus (n = 37) CTU. Single-bolus CTU had higher radiation doses than split-bolus CTU and there were statistically significant differences of all radiation dose indices between two CTU groups without and with stratification by sex and BMI classes. The DRPs of volumetric computed dose index, size-specific dose estimate, dose length product and effective dose using split-bolus CTU were 49%, 49%. 50%, and 45%, respectively. Multiple linear regression with an effect size (f²) as 2.24 showed females (p = 0.027) and higher BMI classes (p = 2.38 *10⁻⁹) were associated with higher effective doses; and split-bolus CTU, lower effective doses (p = 5.40 *10⁻¹⁵). Using split-bolus CTU, females had consistently higher DRP of all radiation dose indices than males (54–55% versus 40–42%). Overweight patients had the largest DRP as 55% of effective dose.ConclusionsSplit-bolus CTU could be preferred by its significant radiation dose reduction effect in regard to single-bolus CTU, which was most profound in females and overweight patients.     

A Monte Carlo simulation for the estimation of patient dose in rest and stress cardiac computed tomography with a 320-detector row CT scanner

PurposeTo estimate organ dose and effective dose for patients for cardiac CT as applied in an international multicenter study (CORE320) with a 320-Detector row CT scanner using Monte Carlo (MC) simulations and voxelized phantoms. The effect of positioning of the arms, off-centering the patient and heart rate on patient dose was analyzed.MethodsA MC code was tailored to simulate the geometry and characteristics of the CT scanner. The phantoms representing the adult reference male and female were implemented according to ICRP 110. Effective dose and organ doses were obtained for CT acquisition protocols for calcium scoring, coronary angiography and myocardial perfusion.ResultsFor low heart rate, the normalized effective dose (E) for cardiac CT was higher for female (5.6 mSv/100 mAs) compared to male (2.2 mSv/100 mAs) due to the contribution of female breast tissue. Averaged E for female and male was 11.3 mSv for the comprehensive cardiac protocol consisting of calcium scoring (1.9 mSv); coronary angiography including rest cardiac perfusion (5.1 mSv) and stress cardiac perfusion (4.3 mSv). These values almost doubled at higher heart rates (20.1 mSv). Excluding the arms increased effective dose by 6–8%, centering the patient showed no significant effect. The k-factor (0.028 mSv/mGy.cm) derived from this study leads to effective doses up to 2–3 times higher than the values obtained using now outdated methodologies.ConclusionMC modeling of cardiac CT examinations on realistic voxelized phantoms allowed us to assess patient doses accurately and we derived k-factors that are well above those published previously.     

Evaluation of a cycle-generative adversarial network-based cone-beam CT to synthetic CT conversion algorithm for adaptive radiation therapy

PurposeImage-guided radiation therapy could benefit from implementing adaptive radiation therapy (ART) techniques. A cycle-generative adversarial network (cycle-GAN)-based cone-beam computed tomography (CBCT)-to-synthetic CT (sCT) conversion algorithm was evaluated regarding image quality, image segmentation and dosimetric accuracy for head and neck (H&N), thoracic and pelvic body regions.MethodsUsing a cycle-GAN, three body site-specific models were priorly trained with independent paired CT and CBCT datasets of a kV imaging system (XVI, Elekta). sCT were generated based on first-fraction CBCT for 15 patients of each body region. Mean errors (ME) and mean absolute errors (MAE) were analyzed for the sCT. On the sCT, manually delineated structures were compared to deformed structures from the planning CT (pCT) and evaluated with standard segmentation metrics. Treatment plans were recalculated on sCT. A comparison of clinically relevant dose-volume parameters (D₉₈, D₅₀ and D₂ of the target volume) and 3D-gamma (3%/3mm) analysis were performed.ResultsThe mean ME and MAE were 1.4, 29.6, 5.4 Hounsfield units (HU) and 77.2, 94.2, 41.8 HU for H&N, thoracic and pelvic region, respectively. Dice similarity coefficients varied between 66.7 ± 8.3% (seminal vesicles) and 94.9 ± 2.0% (lungs). Maximum mean surface distances were 6.3 mm (heart), followed by 3.5 mm (brainstem). The mean dosimetric differences of the target volumes did not exceed 1.7%. Mean 3D gamma pass rates greater than 97.8% were achieved in all cases.ConclusionsThe presented method generates sCT images with a quality close to pCT and yielded clinically acceptable dosimetric deviations. Thus, an important prerequisite towards clinical implementation of CBCT-based ART is fulfilled.     

Radiation dose to patients and staff during angiography of the lower limbs. Derivation of local dose reference levels

BackgroundThe Euratom directive 97/43 recommends the use of patient dose surveys in diagnostic radiology and the establishment of reference dose levels (DRLs).PurposeTo perform measurements of the dose delivered during diagnostic angiography of the lower limbs using thermoluminescence dosimeters (TLDs), extraction of DRLs and estimation of the effective dose and radiation risk for this particular examination.MethodsDose measurement was performed on 30 patients by using TLD sachets attached in 5 different positions not only on the patient, but also to the radiologist. All the appropriate factors were recorded. Measurement of the ESD was performed after each examination.ResultsThe mean entrance skin dose (ESD) was calculated to be 70.8, 67.7, 24.3, 18.4, 9.7 mGy at the level of aorta bifurcation, pelvis, femur, knees, and at feet, respectively. The average effective dose is 9.8 mSv with the radiation risks for fatal cancer to be 5.4 × 10^?4. The effective dose of the radiologist was calculated to be 0.023 mSv per procedure.ConclusionRadiation dose variation depends on the physical characteristics of the patient, on the procedure preferences by radiologists and the difficulties in conducting procedures. The main reason for the increased patient dose, compared to other studies, is the number of frames rather than the duration of fluoroscopy. For DSA of the lower limbs, the DRL was chosen to be an entrance skin dose of 96.4 mGy in the pelvic region. The dose to the radiologist is negligible.     

Eye lens and thyroid gland radiation exposure for patients undergoing brain computed tomography examination

This study aims to estimate the effective radiation dose and organ dose from head CT procedures. It was conducted in three main private hospitals in Khartoum State-Sudan, using Toshiba machines with 64 slices. The total number of patients included in this study was 142 patients (82 males and 60 females). The effective dose and organ dose were calculated by CT Expo software. The effective dose slightly varied among patients according to gender and age. The effective dose for female patients (5.99 mSv) was higher than that for male patients (5.84 mSv), and the pediatric dose (5.46 mSv) was lower than the adults’ dose (5.94 mSv).The dose for eye lens was found lower for male patients (89.117 mSv) than the dose for female patients (94.62) mSv). According to patients’ age: the dose received by the lens of the eye was much lower in pediatric (79.93 mSv) than the adults (92.41 mSv). The dose for thyroid in female patients (33.52 mSv) was higher than the male patients (28 mSv). The pediatric dose (28.34 mSv) was lower than the adults’ dose (30.64 mSv).Departmental imaging protocol and lack of training among hospital staff are expected to be responsible for these variations. Therefore, this study recommends that the CT technologists be trained on suitable strategies to achieve dose optimization. Moreover, patients’ doses must be monitored regularly.     

Effective dose in percutaneous transhepatic biliary drainage examination using PCXMC2.0 and MCNP5 Monte Carlo codes

ObjectivesTo estimate the organ equivalent doses and the effective doses (E) in patient undergoing percutaneous transhepatic biliary drainage (PTBD) examinations, using the MCNP5 and PCXMC2 Monte Carlo-based codes.MethodsThe purpose of this study is to estimate the organ doses to patients undergoing PTBD examinations by clinical measurements and Monte Carlo simulation. Dose area products (DAP) values were assessed during examination of 43 patients undergoing PTBD examination separated into groups based on the gender and the dimensions and location of the beam.ResultsMonte Carlo simulation of photon transport in male and female mathematical phantoms was applied using the MCNP5 and PCXMC2 codes in order to estimate equivalent organ doses. Regarding the PTBD examination the organ receiving the maximum radiation dose was the lumbar spine. The mean calculated H_T for the lumbar spine using the MCNP5 and PCXMC2 methods respectively, was 117.25 mSv and 131.7 mSv, in males. The corresponding doses were 139.45 mSv and 157.1 mSv respectively in females. The H_T values for organs receiving considerable amounts of radiation during PTBD examinations were varied between 0.16% and 73.2% for the male group and between 1.10% and 77.6% for the female group. E in females and males using MCNP5 and PCXMC2.0 was 5.88 mSv and 6.77 mSv, and 4.93 mSv and 5.60 mSv.ConclusionThe doses remain high compared to other invasive operations in interventional radiology. There is a reasonable good coincidence between the MCNP5 and PCXMC2.0 calculation for most of the organs.     

Does Iterative Reconstruction Lower CT Radiation Dose: Evaluation of 15,000 Examinations

Purpose

Evaluation of 15,000 computed tomography (CT) examinations to investigate if iterative reconstruction (IR) reduces sustainably radiation exposure.

Method and Materials

Information from 15,000 CT examinations was collected, including all aspects of the exams such as scan parameter, patient information, and reconstruction instructions. The examinations were acquired between January 2010 and December 2012, while after 15 months a first generation IR algorithm was installed. To collect the necessary information from PACS, RIS, MPPS and structured reports a Dose Monitoring System was developed. To harvest all possible information an optical character recognition system was integrated, for example to collect information from the screenshot CT-dose report. The tool transfers all data to a database for further processing such as the calculation of effective dose and organ doses. To evaluate if IR provides a sustainable dose reduction, the effective dose values were statistically analyzed with respect to protocol type, diagnostic indication, and patient population.

Results

IR has the potential to reduce radiation dose significantly. Before clinical introduction of IR the average effective dose was 10.1±7.8mSv and with IR 8.9±7.1mSv (p*=0.01). Especially in CTA, with the possibility to use kV reduction protocols, such as in aortic CTAs (before IR: average14.2±7.8mSv; median11.4mSv /with IR:average9.9±7.4mSv; median7.4mSv), or pulmonary CTAs (before IR: average9.7±6.2mSV; median7.7mSv /with IR: average6.4±4.7mSv; median4.8mSv) the dose reduction effect is significant(p*=0.01). On the contrary for unenhanced low-dose scans of the cranial (for example sinuses) the reduction is not significant (before IR:average6.6±5.8mSv; median3.9mSv/with IR:average6.0±3.1mSV; median3.2mSv).

Conclusion

The dose aspect remains a priority in CT research. Iterative reconstruction algorithms reduce sustainably and significantly radiation dose in the clinical routine. Our results illustrate that not only in studies with a limited number of patients but also in the clinical routine, IRs provide long-term dose saving.     

A retrospective comparison of organ dose and effective dose in percutaneous vertebroplasty performed under CT guidance or using a fixed C-arm with a flat-panel detector

PurposeTo compare the organ-dose and effective-dose (E) delivered to the patient during percutaneous vertebroplasty (PVP) of one thoracic or lumbar vertebra performed under CT guidance or using a fixed C-arm.MethodsConsecutive adult patients undergoing PVP of one vertebra under CT-guidance, with optimized protocol and training of physicians, or using a fixed C-arm were retrospectively included from January 2016 to June 2017. Organ-doses were computed on 16 organs using CT Expo 2.4 software for the CT procedures and PCXMC 2.0 for the fixed C-arm procedures. E was also computed with both software. Dosimetric values per anatomic locations for all procedures were compared using the paired Mann-Whitney-Wilcoxon test.ResultsIn total, 73 patients were analysed (27 men and 46 women, mean age 78 ± 10 years) among whom 35 (48%) underwent PVP under CT guidance and 38 (52%) PVP using a fixed C-arm. The median E was 11.31 [6.54; 15.82] mSv for all PVPs performed under CT guidance and 5.58 [3.33; 8.71] mSv for fixed C-arm and the differences was significant (p<0.001). For lumbar PVP, the organ doses of stomach, liver and colon were significantly higher with CT-scan than with the fixed C-arm: 97% (p=0.02); 21% (p=0.099) and 375% (p=0.002), respectively. For thoracic PVP, the lung organ dose was significantly higher with CT-scan than with the fixed C-arm (127%; p<0.001) and the oesophagus organ doses were not significantly different (p = 0.626).ConclusionThis study showed that the E and the organ dose on directly exposed organs were both higher for PVP performed under CT-guidance than with the fixed C-arm.     

Monte Carlo study on the secondary cancer risk estimations for patients undergoing prostate radiotherapy: A humanoid phantom study

AimThe aim of this study was to estimate the secondary malignancy risk from the radiation in FFB prostate linac-based radiotherapy for different organs of the patient.BackgroundRadiation therapy is one of the main procedures of cancer treatment. However, the application the radiation may impose dose to organs of the patient which can be the cause of some malignancies.Materials and methodsMonte Carlo (MC) simulation was used to calculate radiation doses to patient organs in 18 MV linear accelerator (linac) based radiotherapy. A humanoid MC phantom was used to calculate the equivalent dose s for different organs and probability of secondary cancer, fatal and nonfatal risk, and other risks and parameters related to megavoltage radiation therapy. In out-of-field radiation calculation, it could be seen that neutrons imparted a higher dose to distant organs, and the dose to surrounding organs was mainly due to absorbed scattered photons and electron contamination.ResultsOur results showed that the bladder and skin with 54.89 × 10⁻³ mSv/Gy and 46.09 × 10⁻³ mSv/Gy, respectively, absorbed the highest equivalent dose s from photoneutrons, while a lower dose was absorbed by the lung at 3.42 × 10⁻³ mSv/Gy. The large intestine and bladder absorbed 55.00 × 10⁻³ mSv/Gy and 49.08 × 10⁻³, respectively, which were the highest equivalent dose s due to photons. The brain absorbed the lowest out-of-field dose, at 1.87 × 10⁻³ mSv/Gy.ConclusionsWe concluded that secondary neutron portion was higher than other radiation. Then, we recommended more attention to neutrons in the radiation protection in linac based high energy radiotherapy.