The case for an error minimizing set of coding amino acids

The fidelity of the translation machinery largely depends on the accuracy by which the tRNAs within the living cells are charged. Aminoacyl-tRNA synthetases (aaRSs) attach amino acids to their cognate tRNAs ensuring the fidelity of translation in coding sequences. Based on the sequence analysis and catalytic domain structure, these enzymes are classified into two major groups of 10 enzymes each. In this study, we have generally tackled the role of aaRSs in decreasing the effects of mistranslations and consequently the evolution of the translation machinery. To this end, a fitness function was introduced in order to measure the accuracy by which each tRNA is charged with its cognate amino acid. Our results suggest that the aaRSs are very well optimized in "load minimization" based on their classes and their mechanisms in distinguishing the correct amino acids. Besides, our results support the idea that from an evolutionary point, a selectional pressure on the translational fidelity seems to be responsible in the occurrence of the 20 coding amino acids.     

From one amino acid to another: tRNA-dependent amino acid biosynthesis

Aminoacyl-tRNAs (aa-tRNAs) are the essential substrates for translation. Most aa-tRNAs are formed by direct aminoacylation of tRNA catalyzed by aminoacyl-tRNA synthetases. However, a smaller number of aa-tRNAs (Asn-tRNA, Gln-tRNA, Cys-tRNA and Sec-tRNA) are made by synthesizing the amino acid on the tRNA by first attaching a non-cognate amino acid to the tRNA, which is then converted to the cognate one catalyzed by tRNA-dependent modifying enzymes. Asn-tRNA or Gln-tRNA formation in most prokaryotes requires amidation of Asp-tRNA or Glu-tRNA by amidotransferases that couple an amidase or an asparaginase to liberate ammonia with a tRNA-dependent kinase. Both archaeal and eukaryotic Sec-tRNA biosynthesis and Cys-tRNA synthesis in methanogens require O-phosophoseryl-tRNA formation. For tRNA-dependent Cys biosynthesis, O-phosphoseryl-tRNA synthetase directly attaches the amino acid to the tRNA which is then converted to Cys by Sep-tRNA: Cys-tRNA synthase. In Sec-tRNA synthesis, O-phosphoseryl-tRNA kinase phosphorylates Ser-tRNA to form the intermediate which is then modified to Sec-tRNA by Sep-tRNA:Sec-tRNA synthase. Complex formation between enzymes in the same pathway may protect the fidelity of protein synthesis. How these tRNA-dependent amino acid biosynthetic routes are integrated into overall metabolism may explain why they are still retained in so many organisms.     

Amino acid specificity in translation

Recent structural and biochemical experiments indicate that bacterial elongation factor Tu and the ribosomal A-site show specificity for both the amino acid and the tRNA portions of their aminoacyl-tRNA (aa-tRNA) substrates. These data are inconsistent with the traditional view that tRNAs are generic adaptors in translation. We hypothesize that each tRNA sequence has co-evolved with its cognate amino acid, such that all aa-tRNAs are translated uniformly.     

Structural elements defining elongation factor Tu mediated suppression of codon ambiguity

In most prokaryotes Asn-tRNA^Asn and Gln-tRNA^Gln are formed by amidation of aspartate and glutamate mischarged onto tRNA^Asn and tRNA^Gln, respectively. Coexistence in the organism of mischarged Asp-tRNA^Asn and Glu-tRNA^Gln and the homologous Asn-tRNA^Asn and Gln-tRNA^Gln does not, however, lead to erroneous incorporation of Asp and Glu into proteins, since EF-Tu discriminates the misacylated tRNAs from the correctly charged ones. This property contrasts with the canonical function of EF-Tu, which is to non-specifically bind the homologous aa-tRNAs, as well as heterologous species formed in vitro by aminoacylation of non-cognate tRNAs. In Thermus thermophilus that forms the Asp-tRNA^Asn intermediate by the indirect pathway of tRNA asparaginylation, EF-Tu must discriminate the mischarged aminoacyl-tRNAs (aa-tRNA). We show that two base pairs in the tRNA T-arm and a single residue in the amino acid binding pocket of EF-Tu promote discrimination of Asp-tRNA^Asn from Asn-tRNA^Asn and Asp-tRNA^Asp by the protein. Our analysis suggests that these structural elements might also contribute to rejection of other mischarged aa-tRNAs formed in vivo that are not involved in peptide elongation. Additionally, these structural features might be involved in maintaining a delicate balance of weak and strong binding affinities between EF-Tu and the amino acid and tRNA moieties of other elongator aa-tRNAs.     

Archaeal aminoacyl-tRNA synthetases interact with the ribosome to recycle tRNAs

Aminoacyl-tRNA synthetases (aaRS) are essential enzymes catalyzing the formation of aminoacyl-tRNAs, the immediate precursors for encoded peptides in ribosomal protein synthesis. Previous studies have suggested a link between tRNA aminoacylation and high-molecular-weight cellular complexes such as the cytoskeleton or ribosomes. However, the structural basis of these interactions and potential mechanistic implications are not well understood. To biochemically characterize these interactions we have used a system of two interacting archaeal aaRSs: an atypical methanogenic-type seryl-tRNA synthetase and an archaeal ArgRS. More specifically, we have shown by thermophoresis and surface plasmon resonance that these two aaRSs bind to the large ribosomal subunit with micromolar affinities. We have identified the L7/L12 stalk and the proteins located near the stalk base as the main sites for aaRS binding. Finally, we have performed a bioinformatics analysis of synonymous codons in the Methanothermobacter thermautotrophicus genome that supports a mechanism in which the deacylated tRNAs may be recharged by aaRSs bound to the ribosome and reused at the next occurrence of a codon encoding the same amino acid. These results suggest a mechanism of tRNA recycling in which aaRSs associate with the L7/L12 stalk region to recapture the tRNAs released from the preceding ribosome in polysomes.     

Binding of misacylated tRNAs to the ribosomal A site

To test whether the ribosome displays specificity for the esterified amino acid and the tRNA body of an aminoacyl-tRNA (aa-tRNA), the stabilities of 4 correctly acylated and 12 misacylated tRNAs in the ribosomal A site were determined. By introducing the GAC (valine) anticodon into each tRNA, a constant anticodon.codon interaction was maintained, thus removing concern that different anticodon.codon strengths might affect the binding of the different aa-tRNAs to the A site. Surprisingly, all 16 aa-tRNAs displayed similar dissociation rate constants from the A site. These results suggest that either the ribosome is not specific for different amino acids and tRNA bodies when intact aa-tRNAs are used or the specificity for the amino acid side chain and tRNA body is masked by a conformational change upon aa-tRNA release.     

Structure of human tryptophanyl-tRNA synthetase in complex with tRNATrp reveals the molecular basis of tRNA recognition and specificity

Aminoacyl-tRNA synthetases (aaRSs) are a family of enzymes responsible for the covalent link of amino acids to their cognate tRNAs. The selectivity and species-specificity in the recognitions of both amino acid and tRNA by aaRSs play a vital role in maintaining the fidelity of protein synthesis. We report here the first crystal structure of human tryptophanyl-tRNA synthetase (hTrpRS) in complex with tRNA^Trp and Trp which, together with biochemical data, reveals the molecular basis of a novel tRNA binding and recognition mechanism. hTrpRS recognizes the tRNA acceptor arm from the major groove; however, the 3′ end CCA of the tRNA makes a sharp turn to bind at the active site with a deformed conformation. The discriminator base A73 is specifically recognized by an α-helix of the unique N-terminal domain and the anticodon loop by an α-helix insertion of the C-terminal domain. The N-terminal domain appears to be involved in Trp activation, but not essential for tRNA binding and acylation. Structural and sequence comparisons suggest that this novel tRNA binding and recognition mechanism is very likely shared by other archaeal and eukaryotic TrpRSs, but not by bacterial TrpRSs. Our findings provide insights into the molecular basis of tRNA specificity and species-specificity.     

氨酰-tRNA合成酶维持翻译忠实性的机制

氨酰-tRNA合成酶在维持蛋白质合成忠实性方面具有重要的作用.其忠实性机制可以分为正确地选择底物、转位前编辑、顺式转位后编辑和反式转位后编辑4个水平.不同的氨酰-tRNA合成酶能够利用其中的一种或几种机制,将氨基酸和tRNA连接起来,形成正确的氨酰-tRNA.目前,氨酰-tRNA合成酶的研究超出蛋白质合成,已经延伸到了...     

A rapid method for determining tRNA charging levels in vivo: analysis of yeast mutants defective in the general control of amino acid biosynthesis.

We describe a simple method to quantitate the intracellular levels of charged tRNA species representing all 20 amino acids. Small RNA species are isolated from yeast cells under conditions where amino acids remain bound to their cognate tRNAs. After chromatographic removal of free amino acids, the tRNAs are discharged, and the amounts of the released amino acids are then quantitated. This method was applied to yeast cells from a wild type strain and from three mutant strains that are defective both in the general control of amino acid biosynthesis and in protein synthesis. Two of these mutant strains, previously shown to be defective in the methionine or isoleucine tRNA synthetases, respectively contain undetectable amounts of charged methionine or isoleucine although their levels of the remaining 19 amino acids are similar to a wild type strain. In contrast, a gcd1 mutant strain has normal levels of all 20 amino-acyl tRNA species. Thus, gcd1 strains are defective in general control of amino acid biosynthesis for reasons other than artifactual starvation of an amino acid due to a failure in tRNA changing.     

Is the sequence-specific binding of aminoacyl-tRNAs by EF-Tu universal among bacteria?

Three base pairs in the T-stem are primarily responsible for the sequence-specific interaction of tRNA with Escherichia coli and Thermus thermophilus EF-Tu. While the amino acids on the surface of EF-Tu that contact aminoacyl-tRNA (aa-tRNA) are highly conserved among bacteria, the T-stem sequences of individual tRNA are variable, making it unclear whether or not this protein-nucleic acid interaction is also sequence specific in other bacteria. We propose and validate a thermodynamic model that predicts the ΔG° of any tRNA to EF-Tu using the sequence of its three T-stem base pairs. Despite dramatic differences in T-stem sequences, the predicted ΔG° values for the majority of tRNA classes are similar in all bacteria and closely match the ΔG° values determined for E. coli tRNAs. Each individual tRNA class has evolved to have a characteristic ΔG° value to EF-Tu, but different T-stem sequences are used to achieve this ΔG° value in different bacteria. Thus, the compensatory relationship between the affinity of the tRNA body and the affinity of the esterified amino acid is universal among bacteria. Additionally, we predict and validate a small number of aa-tRNAs that bind more weakly to EF-Tu than expected and thus are candidates for acting as activated amino acid donors in processes outside of translation.     

Relationship of the CCA sequence of tRNA with the early evolutional aspect of aminoacyl-tRNA synthetases.

The CCA sequence is common to the 3'-ends of all tRNAs. We investigated the requirement of the CCA sequence in aminoacylation with the cognate aminoacyl-tRNA synthetases (aaRSs) and several interesting conclusions could be drawn. In tRNAs belonging to the class I aaRSs, decreased aminoacylation activities resulted from the substitution of A76 with a pyrimidine, whereas in tRNAs belonging to the class II aaRSs, decreased aminoacylation activities resulted from the substitution with guanine. The results suggest that aminoacylation of proto-tRNA might have started through the direct hydrophobic (or stacking) interaction between the large, hydrophobic amino acid residue (now utilizing a class I aaRS) of aminoacyl-AMP and the 3'-terminal adenine. The shorter distance between the adenine and the 2'-OH position than the 3'-OH position, and the bulkiness and hydrophobicity of amino acids may be important reasons why class I aaRSs select the 2'-OH position in aminoacylation. Molecular mechanics-based conformation modeling also indicated that the resulting positioning of the adenine and the amino acid residue of 2'-aminoacyl-adenosine for large amino acid is in the vicinity. In contrast, in the case of small amino acids (with class II aaRSs) which would not be able to use the hydrophobic interaction, a protein enzyme might have participated in the aminoacylation reaction from an early stage. The active-site folds of aaRSs belonging to each class reflect the history of evolution: typical nucleotide-binding fold (Rossman fold) in the case of class I aaRSs, and primitive fold which is found also among the family of nonribosomal peptide synthetases in the case of class II aaRSs.     

谷氨酰-脯氨酰-tRNA合成酶的非经典功能——炎症相关基因特异性的翻译沉默

氨基酰-tRNA合成酶（aaRS）催化氨基酰化反应,为生物体内的蛋白质合成提供原料。哺乳动物细胞质中一种双功能aaRS谷氨酰-脯氨酰-tRNA合成酶（EPRS）通常负责将谷氨酸和脯氨酸分别接载到对应的tRNA的3’末端参与蛋白质翻译;此外,它还具有与氨基酰化经典功能无关的单核/巨噬细胞特异性炎症相关基因翻译沉默的非经典功能。在过去的十五年间,对于EPRS参与炎症反应相关基因表达调控的功能研究取得了一系列重要进展,揭示了看家基因EPRS与人类疾病发生和发展的潜在联系。     

Selection of tRNA charging quality control mechanisms that increase mistranslation of the genetic code

Mistranslation can follow two events during protein synthesis: production of non-cognate amino acid:transfer RNA (tRNA) pairs by aminoacyl-tRNA synthetases (aaRSs) and inaccurate selection of aminoacyl-tRNAs by the ribosome. Many aaRSs actively edit non-cognate amino acids, but editing mechanisms are not evolutionarily conserved, and their physiological significance remains unclear. To address the connection between aaRSs and mistranslation, the evolutionary divergence of tyrosine editing by phenylalanyl-tRNA synthetase (PheRS) was used as a model. Certain PheRSs are naturally error prone, most notably a Mycoplasma example that displayed a low level of specificity consistent with elevated mistranslation of the proteome. Mycoplasma PheRS was found to lack canonical editing activity, relying instead on discrimination against the non-cognate amino acid by kinetic proofreading. This mechanism of discrimination is inadequate for organisms where translation is more accurate, as Mycoplasma PheRS failed to support Escherichia coli growth. However, minor changes in the defunct editing domain of the Mycoplasma enzyme were sufficient to restore E. coli growth, indicating that translational accuracy is an evolutionarily selectable trait.     

Advances in the mechanism and understanding of site-selective noncanonical amino acid incorporation

There are many approaches to introduce non-native functionality into proteins either translationally or post-translationally. When a noncanonical amino acid (NAA) is incorporated translationally, the host organism's existing translational machinery is relied upon to insert the amino acid by the same well-established mechanisms used by the host to achieve high fidelity insertion of its canonical amino acids. Research into the in vivo incorporation of NAAs has typically concentrated on evolving or engineering aminoacyl tRNA synthetases (aaRSs); however, new studies have increasingly focused on other members of the translational apparatus, for example entire ribosomes, in attempts to increase the fidelity and efficiency of incorporation of ever more structurally diverse NAAs. As the biochemical methods of NAA systems increase in complexity, it is informative to ask whether the 'rules' for canonical translation (i.e. aaRSs, tRNA, ribosomes, elongation factors, amino acid uptake, and metabolism) hold for NAA systems, or whether new rules are warranted. Here, recent advances in introducing novel chemical functionality into proteins are highlighted.     

Trans-oligomerization of duplicated aminoacyl-tRNA synthetases maintains genetic code fidelity under stress

Aminoacyl-tRNA synthetases (aaRSs) play a key role in deciphering the genetic message by producing charged tRNAs and are equipped with proofreading mechanisms to ensure correct pairing of tRNAs with their cognate amino acid. Duplicated aaRSs are very frequent in Nature, with 25,913 cases observed in 26,837 genomes. The oligomeric nature of many aaRSs raises the question of how the functioning and oligomerization of duplicated enzymes is organized. We characterized this issue in a model prokaryotic organism that expresses two different threonyl-tRNA synthetases, responsible for Thr-tRNA^Thr synthesis: one accurate and constitutively expressed (T1) and another (T2) with impaired proofreading activity that also generates mischarged Ser-tRNA^Thr. Low zinc promotes dissociation of dimeric T1 into monomers deprived of aminoacylation activity and simultaneous induction of T2, which is active for aminoacylation under low zinc. T2 either forms homodimers or heterodimerizes with T1 subunits that provide essential proofreading activity in trans. These findings evidence that in organisms with duplicated genes, cells can orchestrate the assemblage of aaRSs oligomers that meet the necessities of the cell in each situation. We propose that controlled oligomerization of duplicated aaRSs is an adaptive mechanism that can potentially be expanded to the plethora of organisms with duplicated oligomeric aaRSs.     

Attenuation of the editing activity of the Escherichia coli leucyl-tRNA synthetase allows incorporation of novel amino acids into proteins in vivo

The fidelity of translation is dependent on the specificity of the aminoacyl-tRNA synthetases (aaRSs). The aaRSs that activate the hydrophobic amino acids leucine, isoleucine, and valine employ a proofreading mechanism that hydrolyzes noncognate aminoacyl adenylates and misaminoacylated tRNAs. Discrimination between structurally similar amino acids by these AARSs is believed to operate by a double-sieve principle, wherein a separate editing domain governs hydrolysis on the basis of the size and hydrophilicity of the amino acid side chain. Leucyl-tRNA synthetase (LeuRS) relies on its editing function to correct misaminoacylation of tRNA(Leu) by isoleucine and methionine. Thr252 of Escherichia coli LeuRS has been shown previously to be important in defining the size of the editing cavity. Here we report the isolation and characterization of three LeuRS mutants with point mutations at this position (T252Y, T252L, and T252F). The proofreading activity of the synthetase is significantly impaired when an amino acid bulkier than threonine is introduced. The rate of misaminoacylation of tRNA(Leu) by isoleucine and valine increases with the increasing size of the amino acid substituent at position 252, and the noncognate amino acids norvaline and norleucine are inserted efficiently at the leucine sites of recombinant proteins under conditions of constitutive overexpression of the T252Y mutant in E. coli. In addition, the unsaturated amino acids allylglycine, homoallylglycine, homopropargylglycine, and 2-butynylalanine all support protein synthesis in E. coli hosts harboring the mutant synthetase. These results demonstrate that programmed manipulation of the editing cavity can allow in vivo incorporation of novel protein building blocks.