Type 1 Cannabinoid Receptor Ligands Display Functional Selectivity in a Cell Culture Model of Striatal Medium Spiny Projection Neurons

Modulation of type 1 cannabinoid receptor (CB₁) activity has been touted as a potential means of treating addiction, anxiety, depression, and neurodegeneration. Different agonists of CB₁ are known to evoke varied responses in vivo. Functional selectivity is the ligand-specific activation of certain signal transduction pathways at a receptor that can signal through multiple pathways. To understand cannabinoid-specific functional selectivity, different groups have examined the effect of individual cannabinoids on various signaling pathways in heterologous expression systems. In the current study, we compared the functional selectivity of six cannabinoids, including two endocannabinoids (2-arachidonyl glycerol (2-AG) and anandamide (AEA)), two synthetic cannabinoids (WIN55,212-2 and CP55,940), and two phytocannabinoids (cannabidiol (CBD) and Δ⁹-tetrahydrocannabinol (THC)) on arrestin2-, Gα_i/o-, Gβγ-, Gα_s-, and Gα_q-mediated intracellular signaling in the mouse STHdh^Q7/Q7 cell culture model of striatal medium spiny projection neurons that endogenously express CB₁. In this system, 2-AG, THC, and CP55,940 were more potent mediators of arrestin2 recruitment than other cannabinoids tested. 2-AG, AEA, and WIN55,212-2, enhanced Gα_i/o and Gβγ signaling, with 2-AG and AEA treatment leading to increased total CB₁ levels. 2-AG, AEA, THC, and WIN55,212-2 also activated Gα_q-dependent pathways. CP55,940 and CBD both signaled through Gα_s. CP55,940, but not CBD, activated downstream Gα_s pathways via CB₁ targets. THC and CP55,940 promoted CB₁ internalization and decreased CB₁ protein levels over an 18-h period. These data demonstrate that individual cannabinoids display functional selectivity at CB₁ leading to activation of distinct signaling pathways. To effectively match cannabinoids with therapeutic goals, these compounds must be screened for their signaling bias.     

Cannabinoid Effects on β Amyloid Fibril and Aggregate Formation,Neuronal and Microglial-Activated Neurotoxicity In Vitro

Cannabinoid (CB) ligands have demonstrated neuroprotective properties. In this study we compared the effects of a diverse set of CB ligands against β amyloid-mediated neuronal toxicity and activated microglial-conditioned media-based neurotoxicity in vitro, and compared this with a capacity to directly alter β amyloid (Aβ) fibril or aggregate formation. Neuroblastoma (SH-SY5Y) cells were exposed to Aβ_1–42 directly or microglial (BV-2 cells) conditioned media activated with lipopolysaccharide (LPS) in the presence of the CB1 receptor-selective agonist ACEA, CB2 receptor-selective agonist JWH-015, phytocannabinoids Δ⁹-THC and cannabidiol (CBD), the endocannabinoids 2-arachidonoyl glycerol (2-AG) and anandamide or putative GPR18/GPR55 ligands O-1602 and abnormal-cannabidiol (Abn-CBD). TNF-α and nitrite production was measured in BV-2 cells to compare activation via LPS or albumin with Aβ_1–42. Aβ_1–42 evoked a concentration-dependent loss of cell viability in SH-SY5Y cells but negligible TNF-α and nitrite production in BV-2 cells compared to albumin or LPS. Both albumin and LPS-activated BV-2 conditioned media significantly reduced neuronal cell viability but were directly innocuous to SH-SY5Y cells. Of those CB ligands tested, only 2-AG and CBD were directly protective against Aβ-evoked SH-SY5Y cell viability, whereas JWH-015, THC, CBD, Abn-CBD and O-1602 all protected SH-SY5Y cells from BV-2 conditioned media activated via LPS. While CB ligands variably altered the morphology of Aβ fibrils and aggregates, there was no clear correlation between effects on Aβ morphology and neuroprotective actions. These findings indicate a neuroprotective action of CB ligands via actions at microglial and neuronal cells.     

Brain regional differences in CB1 receptor adaptation and regulation of transcription

Cannabinoid CB₁ receptors (CB₁Rs) are expressed throughout the brain and mediate the central effects of cannabinoids, including Δ⁹-tetrahydrocannabinol (THC), the main psychoactive constituent of marijuana. Repeated THC administration produces tolerance to cannabinoid-mediated effects, although the magnitude of tolerance varies by effect. Consistent with this observation, CB₁R desensitization and downregulation, as well as induction of immediate early genes (IEGs), vary by brain region. Zif268 and c-Fos are induced in the forebrain after acute THC administration. Phosphorylation of the cAMP response-element binding protein (CREB) is increased in a region-specific manner after THC administration. Results differ between acute versus repeated THC injection, and suggest that tolerance to IEG activation might develop in some regions. Repeated THC treatment produces CB₁R desensitization and downregulation in the brain, although less adaption occurs in the striatum as compared to regions such as the hippocampus. Repeated THC treatment also induces expression of ΔFosB, a very stable isoform of FosB, in the striatum. Transgenic expression of ?FosB in the striatum enhances the rewarding effects of several drugs, but its role in THC-mediated effects is not known. The inverse regional relationship between CB₁R desensitization and ?FosB induction suggests that these adaptations might inhibit each other, although this possibility has not been investigated. The differential regional expression of individual IEGs by acute or repeated THC administration suggests that regulation of target genes and effects on CB₁R signaling will contribute to the behavioral effects of THC.     

THC Prevents MDMA Neurotoxicity in Mice

The majority of MDMA (ecstasy) recreational users also consume cannabis. Despite the rewarding effects that both drugs have, they induce several opposite pharmacological responses. MDMA causes hyperthermia, oxidative stress and neuronal damage, especially at warm ambient temperature. However, THC, the main psychoactive compound of cannabis, produces hypothermic, anti-inflammatory and antioxidant effects. Therefore, THC may have a neuroprotective effect against MDMA-induced neurotoxicity. Mice receiving a neurotoxic regimen of MDMA (20 mg/kg ×4) were pretreated with THC (3 mg/kg ×4) at room (21°C) and at warm (26°C) temperature, and body temperature, striatal glial activation and DA terminal loss were assessed. To find out the mechanisms by which THC may prevent MDMA hyperthermia and neurotoxicity, the same procedure was carried out in animals pretreated with the CB₁ receptor antagonist AM251 and the CB₂ receptor antagonist AM630, as well as in CB₁, CB₂ and CB₁/CB₂ deficient mice. THC prevented MDMA-induced-hyperthermia and glial activation in animals housed at both room and warm temperature. Surprisingly, MDMA-induced DA terminal loss was only observed in animals housed at warm but not at room temperature, and this neurotoxic effect was reversed by THC administration. However, THC did not prevent MDMA-induced hyperthermia, glial activation, and DA terminal loss in animals treated with the CB₁ receptor antagonist AM251, neither in CB₁ and CB₁/CB₂ knockout mice. On the other hand, THC prevented MDMA-induced hyperthermia and DA terminal loss, but only partially suppressed glial activation in animals treated with the CB₂ cannabinoid antagonist and in CB₂ knockout animals. Our results indicate that THC protects against MDMA neurotoxicity, and suggest that these neuroprotective actions are primarily mediated by the reduction of hyperthermia through the activation of CB₁ receptor, although CB₂ receptors may also contribute to attenuate neuroinflammation in this process.     

CB₁ receptor activation inhibits neuronal and astrocytic intermediary metabolism in the rat hippocampus

Cannabinoid CB₁ receptor (CB₁R) activation decreases synaptic GABAergic and glutamatergic transmission and it also controls peripheral metabolism. Here we aimed at testing with ¹³C NMR isotopomer analysis whether CB₁Rs could have a local metabolic role in brain areas having high CB₁R density, such as the hippocampus. We labelled hippocampal slices with the tracers [2-¹³C]acetate, which is oxidized in glial cells, and [U-¹³C]glucose, which is metabolized both in glia and neurons, to evaluate metabolic compartmentation between glia and neurons. The synthetic CB₁R agonist WIN55212-2 (1 μM) significantly decreased the metabolism of both [2-¹³C]acetate (−11.6 ± 2.0%) and [U-¹³C]glucose (−11.2 ± 3.4%) in the tricarboxylic acid cycle that contributes to the glutamate pool. WIN55212-2 also significantly decreased the metabolism of [U-¹³C]glucose (−11.7 ± 4.0%) but not that of [2-¹³C]acetate contributing to the pool of GABA. These effects of WIN55212-2 were prevented by the CB₁R antagonist AM251 (500 nM). These results thus suggest that CB₁Rs might be present also in hippocampal astrocytes besides their well-known neuronal localization. Indeed, confocal microscopy analysis revealed the presence of specific CB₁R immunoreactivity in astrocytes and pericytes throughout the hippocampus.In conclusion, CB₁Rs are able to control hippocampal intermediary metabolism in both neuronal and glial compartments, which suggests new alternative mechanisms by which CB₁Rs control cell physiology and afford neuroprotection.     

The influence of beta-arrestin2 on cannabinoid CB1 receptor coupling to G-proteins and subcellular localization and relative levels of beta-arrestin1 and 2 in mouse brain

Abstract

Context: Beta-arrestins are known to couple to some G-protein-coupled receptors (GPCRs) to regulate receptor internalization, G-protein coupling and signal transduction, but have not been investigated for most receptors, and for very few receptors in vivo. Previous studies have shown that beta-arrestin2 deletion enhances the efficacy of specific cannabinoid agonists. Objective: The present study hypothesized that brain cannabinoid CB₁ receptors are regulated by beta-arrestin2. Methods: Beta-arrestin2+/+ and ?/? mice were used. Western blotting was used to determine the relative levels of each beta-arrestin subtype in mouse brain. Receptor binding was measured to determine whether deletion of beta-arrestin2 influences agonist binding to brain CB₁ receptors, or the subcellular localization of CB₁ in brain membranes subjected to differential centrifugation. A variety of cannabinoid agonists from different chemical classes were investigated for their ability to activate G-proteins in the presence and absence of beta-arrestin2 in cerebellum, hippocampus and cortex. Results: No differences were found in the density of beta-arrestin1 or cannabinoid CB₁ receptors in several brains of beta-arrestin2+/+ versus ?/? mice. Differences between genotypes were found in the proportion of high- and low-affinity agonist binding sites in brain areas that naturally express higher levels of beta-arrestin2. Cortex from beta-arrestin2?/? mice contained less CB₁ in the P1 fraction and more CB₁ in the P2 fraction compared to beta-arrestin2+/+. Of the agonists assayed for activity, only Δ⁹-tetrahydrocannabinol (THC) exhibited a difference between genotypes, in that it was less efficacious in beta-arrestin2?/? than +/+ mouse membranes. Conclusion: Beta-arrestin2 regulates cannabinoid CB₁ receptors in brain.     

Inhibition of colon carcinogenesis by a standardized Cannabis sativa extract with high content of cannabidiol

PurposeColon cancer is a major public health problem. Cannabis-based medicines are useful adjunctive treatments in cancer patients. Here, we have investigated the effect of a standardized Cannabis sativa extract with high content of cannabidiol (CBD), here named CBD BDS, i.e. CBD botanical drug substance, on colorectal cancer cell proliferation and in experimental models of colon cancer in vivo.MethodsProliferation was evaluated in colorectal carcinoma (DLD-1 and HCT116) as well as in healthy colonic cells using the MTT assay. CBD BDS binding was evaluated by its ability to displace [³H]CP55940 from human cannabinoid CB₁ and CB₂ receptors. In vivo, the effect of CBD BDS was examined on the preneoplastic lesions (aberrant crypt foci), polyps and tumours induced by the carcinogenic agent azoxymethane (AOM) as well as in a xenograft model of colon cancer in mice.ResultsCBD BDS and CBD reduced cell proliferation in tumoral, but not in healthy, cells. The effect of CBD BDS was counteracted by selective CB₁ and CB₂ receptor antagonists. Pure CBD reduced cell proliferation in a CB₁-sensitive antagonist manner only. In binding assays, CBD BDS showed greater affinity than pure CBD for both CB₁ and CB₂ receptors, with pure CBD having very little affinity. In vivo, CBD BDS reduced AOM-induced preneoplastic lesions and polyps as well as tumour growth in the xenograft model of colon cancer.ConclusionsCBD BDS attenuates colon carcinogenesis and inhibits colorectal cancer cell proliferation via CB₁ and CB₂ receptor activation. The results may have some clinical relevance for the use of Cannabis-based medicines in cancer patients.     

Human orexin/hypocretin receptors form constitutive homo- and heteromeric complexes with each other and with human CB1 cannabinoid receptors

Human OX₁ orexin receptors have been shown to homodimerize and they have also been suggested to heterodimerize with CB₁ cannabinoid receptors. The latter has been suggested to be important for orexin receptor responses and trafficking. In this study, we wanted to assess the ability of the other combinations of receptors to also form similar complexes. Vectors for expression of human OX₁, OX₂ and CB₁ receptors, C-terminally fused with either Renilla luciferase or GFP² green fluorescent protein variant, were generated. The constructs were transiently expressed in Chinese hamster ovary cells, and constitutive dimerization between the receptors was assessed by bioluminescence energy transfer (BRET). Orexin receptor subtypes readily formed homo- and hetero(di)mers, as suggested by significant BRET signals. CB₁ receptors formed homodimers, and they also heterodimerized with both orexin receptors. Interestingly, BRET efficiency was higher for homodimers than for almost all heterodimers. This is likely to be due to the geometry of the interaction; the putatively symmetric dimers may place the C-termini in a more suitable orientation in homomers. Fusion of luciferase to an orexin receptor and GFP² to CB₁ produced more effective BRET than the opposite fusions, also suggesting differences in geometry. Similar was seen for the OX₁–OX₂ interaction. In conclusion, orexin receptors have a significant propensity to make homo- and heterodi-/oligomeric complexes. However, it is unclear whether this affects their signaling. As orexin receptors efficiently signal via endocannabinoid production to CB₁ receptors, dimerization could be an effective way of forming signal complexes with optimal cannabinoid concentrations available for cannabinoid receptors.     

The effects of beta-arrestin1 deletion on acute cannabinoid activity,brain cannabinoid receptors and tolerance to cannabinoids in mice

Abstract

Context: Previous studies have indicated a role for beta-arrestin2 in the regulation of brain cannabinoid effects and cannabinoid CB₁ receptors, but whether beta-arrestin1 has a role has not been investigated. Objective: To determine the role of beta-arrestin1 in cannabinoid activity. Materials and methods: Beta-arrestin1 ?/? mice and their wild-type (+/+) counterparts were assayed for antinociceptive and temperature-decreasing effects of two ligands, Δ⁹-tetrahydrocannabinol (THC) and CP55940, after both single and repeated administration. In vitro assays examined the effects of deletion on CB₁ receptor density, agonist-binding and G-protein activation. Results: Deletion of beta-arrestin1 diminished the effects of CP55940 in both antinociception (latency to tail withdrawal) and temperature-depression assays in mice. However, deleting beta-arrestin1 had no effect on the actions of THC in either assay. Antagonist radioligand ([³H]SR141716A) saturation binding indicated no difference between beta-arrestin1 +/+ and ?/? mice in the density or affinity for cannabinoid CB₁ receptors in brain membranes. CP55940 agonist binding in brain membranes from beta-arrestin1 +/+ mice exhibited high- and intermediate-affinity sites, but beta-arrestin1 ?/? membranes exhibited an additional site with low affinity. CP55940 produced greater stimulation of [³⁵S]GTPγS binding to membranes from whole brain of beta-arrestin1 ?/? than +/+ mice. The rates of the development of tolerance to chronic THC or CP55940 administration did not appear to be affected by genotype. Discussion: Beta-arrestin1 appeared to mediate the actions of CP55940, but did not affect the activity of THC. Conclusion: Beta-arrestin1 regulates cannabinoid CB₁ receptor sensitivity in an agonist-selective manner, but may not be the primary mediator of tolerance to cannabinoid agonists.     

The Non-Psychoactive Plant Cannabinoid,Cannabidiol Affects Cholesterol Metabolism-Related Genes in Microglial Cells

Cannabidiol (CBD) is a non-psychoactive plant cannabinoid that is clinically used in a 1:1 mixture with the psychoactive cannabinoid Δ⁹-tetrahydrocannabinol (THC) for the treatment of neuropathic pain and spasticity in multiple sclerosis. Our group previously reported that CBD exerts anti-inflammatory effects on microglial cells. In addition, we found that CBD treatment increases the accumulation of the endocannabinoid N-arachidonoyl ethanolamine (AEA), thus enhancing endocannabinoid signaling. Here we proceeded to investigate the effects of CBD on the modulation of lipid-related genes in microglial cells. Cell viability was tested using FACS analysis, AEA levels were measured using LC/MS/MS, gene array analysis was validated with real-time qPCR, and cytokine release was measured using ELISA. We report that CBD significantly upregulated the mRNAs of the enzymes sterol-O-acyl transferase (Soat2), which synthesizes cholesteryl esters, and of sterol 27-hydroxylase (Cyp27a1). In addition, CBD increased the mRNA of the lipid droplet-associated protein, perilipin2 (Plin2). Moreover, we found that pretreatment of the cells with the cholesterol chelating agent, methyl-β-cyclodextrin (MBCD), reversed the CBD-induced increase in Soat2 mRNA but not in Plin2 mRNA. Incubation with AEA increased the level of Plin2, but not of Soat2 mRNA. Furthermore, MBCD treatment did not affect the reduction by CBD of the LPS-induced release of the proinflammatory cytokine IL-1β. CBD treatment modulates cholesterol homeostasis in microglial cells, and pretreatment with MBCD reverses this effect without interfering with CBD’s anti-inflammatory effects. The effects of the CBD-induced increase in AEA accumulation on lipid-gene expression are discussed.     

Mechanistic origin of partial agonism of tetrahydrocannabinol for cannabinoid receptors

Cannabinoid receptor 1 (CB₁) is a therapeutically relevant drug target for controlling pain, obesity, and other central nervous system disorders. However, full agonists and antagonists of CB₁ have been reported to cause serious side effects in patients. Therefore, partial agonists have emerged as a viable alternative as they can mitigate overstimulation and side effects. One of the key bottlenecks in the design of partial agonists, however, is the lack of understanding of the molecular mechanism of partial agonism itself. In this study, we examine two mechanistic hypotheses for the origin of partial agonism in cannabinoid receptors and predict the mechanistic basis of partial agonism exhibited by Δ⁹-Tetrahydrocannabinol (THC) against CB₁. In particular, we inspect whether partial agonism emerges from the ability of THC to bind in both agonist and antagonist-binding poses or from its ability to only partially activate the receptor. We used extensive molecular dynamics simulations and Markov state modeling to capture the THC binding in both antagonist and agonist-binding poses in the CB₁ receptor. Furthermore, we predict that binding of THC in the agonist-binding pose leads to rotation of toggle switch residues and causes partial outward movement of intracellular transmembrane helix 6 (TM6). Our simulations also suggest that the alkyl side chain of THC plays a crucial role in determining partial agonism by stabilizing the ligand in the agonist and antagonist-like poses within the pocket. Taken together, this study provides important insights into the mechanistic origin of the partial agonism of THC.     

Structural divergence among cannabinoids influences membrane dynamics: A H Solid-State NMR analysis

Cannabinoids are compounds that can modulate neuronal functions and immune responses via their activity at the CB₁ receptor. We used ²H NMR order parameters and relaxation rate determination to delineate the behavior of magnetically aligned phospholipid bilayers in the presence of several structurally distinct cannabinoid ligands. THC (Δ⁹-Tetrahydrocannabinol) and WIN-55,212-2 were found to lower the phase transition temperature of the DMPC and to destabilize their acyl chains leading to a lower average S_CD (≈ 0.13), while methanandamide and CP-55,940 exhibited unusual properties within the lipid bilayer resulting in a greater average S_CD (≈ 0.14) at the top of the phospholipid upper chain. The CB₁ antagonist AM281 had average S_CD values that were higher than the pure DMPC lipids, indicating a stabilization of the lipid bilayer. R_1Z versus |S_CD|² plots indicated that the membrane fluidity is increased in the presence of THC and WIN-55,212-2. The interaction of CP-55,940 with a variety of zwitterionic and charged membranes was also assessed. The unusual effect of CP-55,940 was present only in bicelles composed of DMPC. These studies strongly suggest that cannabinoid action on the membrane depends upon membrane composition as well as the structure of the cannabinoid ligands.     

Is lipid signaling through cannabinoid 2 receptors part of a protective system?

The mammalian body has a highly developed immune system which guards against continuous invading protein attacks and aims at preventing, attenuating or repairing the inflicted damage. It is conceivable that through evolution analogous biological protective systems have been evolved against non-protein attacks. There is emerging evidence that lipid endocannabinoid signaling through cannabinoid 2 (CB₂) receptors may represent an example/part of such a protective system/armamentarium. Inflammation/tissue injury triggers rapid elevations in local endocannabinoid levels, which in turn regulate signaling responses in immune and other cells modulating their critical functions. Changes in endocannabinoid levels and/or CB₂ receptor expressions have been reported in almost all diseases affecting humans, ranging from cardiovascular, gastrointestinal, liver, kidney, neurodegenerative, psychiatric, bone, skin, autoimmune, lung disorders to pain and cancer, and modulating CB₂ receptor activity holds tremendous therapeutic potential in these pathologies. While CB₂ receptor activation in general mediates immunosuppressive effects, which limit inflammation and associated tissue injury in large number of pathological conditions, in some disease states activation of the CB₂ receptor may enhance or even trigger tissue damage, which will also be discussed alongside the protective actions of the CB₂ receptor stimulation with endocannabinoids or synthetic agonists, and the possible biological mechanisms involved in these effects.     

Cognitive Impairment Induced by Delta9-tetrahydrocannabinol Occurs through Heteromers between Cannabinoid CB1 and Serotonin 5-HT2A Receptors

Activation of cannabinoid CB1 receptors (CB₁R) by delta9-tetrahydrocannabinol (THC) produces a variety of negative effects with major consequences in cannabis users that constitute important drawbacks for the use of cannabinoids as therapeutic agents. For this reason, there is a tremendous medical interest in harnessing the beneficial effects of THC. Behavioral studies carried out in mice lacking 5-HT_2A receptors (5-HT_2AR) revealed a remarkable 5-HT_2AR-dependent dissociation in the beneficial antinociceptive effects of THC and its detrimental amnesic properties. We found that specific effects of THC such as memory deficits, anxiolytic-like effects, and social interaction are under the control of 5-HT_2AR, but its acute hypolocomotor, hypothermic, anxiogenic, and antinociceptive effects are not. In biochemical studies, we show that CB₁R and 5-HT_2AR form heteromers that are expressed and functionally active in specific brain regions involved in memory impairment. Remarkably, our functional data shows that costimulation of both receptors by agonists reduces cell signaling, antagonist binding to one receptor blocks signaling of the interacting receptor, and heteromer formation leads to a switch in G-protein coupling for 5-HT_2AR from Gq to Gi proteins. Synthetic peptides with the sequence of transmembrane helices 5 and 6 of CB₁R, fused to a cell-penetrating peptide, were able to disrupt receptor heteromerization in vivo, leading to a selective abrogation of memory impairments caused by exposure to THC. These data reveal a novel molecular mechanism for the functional interaction between CB₁R and 5-HT_2AR mediating cognitive impairment. CB₁R-5-HT_2AR heteromers are thus good targets to dissociate the cognitive deficits induced by THC from its beneficial antinociceptive properties.     

Targeting the endocannabinoid system with cannabinoid receptor agonists: pharmacological strategies and therapeutic possibilities

Human tissues express cannabinoid CB₁ and CB₂ receptors that can be activated by endogenously released ‘endocannabinoids’ or exogenously administered compounds in a manner that reduces the symptoms or opposes the underlying causes of several disorders in need of effective therapy. Three medicines that activate cannabinoid CB₁/CB₂ receptors are now in the clinic: Cesamet (nabilone), Marinol (dronabinol; Δ⁹-tetrahydrocannabinol (Δ⁹-THC)) and Sativex (Δ⁹-THC with cannabidiol). These can be prescribed for the amelioration of chemotherapy-induced nausea and vomiting (Cesamet and Marinol), stimulation of appetite (Marinol) and symptomatic relief of cancer pain and/or management of neuropathic pain and spasticity in adults with multiple sclerosis (Sativex). This review mentions several possible additional therapeutic targets for cannabinoid receptor agonists. These include other kinds of pain, epilepsy, anxiety, depression, Parkinson''s and Huntington''s diseases, amyotrophic lateral sclerosis, stroke, cancer, drug dependence, glaucoma, autoimmune uveitis, osteoporosis, sepsis, and hepatic, renal, intestinal and cardiovascular disorders. It also describes potential strategies for improving the efficacy and/or benefit-to-risk ratio of these agonists in the clinic. These are strategies that involve (i) targeting cannabinoid receptors located outside the blood-brain barrier, (ii) targeting cannabinoid receptors expressed by a particular tissue, (iii) targeting upregulated cannabinoid receptors, (iv) selectively targeting cannabinoid CB₂ receptors, and/or (v) adjunctive ‘multi-targeting’.     

3-Carboxamido-5-aryl-isoxazoles as new CB2 agonists for the treatment of colitis

Recent investigations showed that anandamide, the main endogenous ligand of CB₁ and CB₂ cannabinoid receptors, possesses analgesic, antidepressant and anti-inflammatory effects. In the perspective to treat inflammatory bowel disease (IBD), our approach was to develop new selective CB₂ receptor agonists without psychotropic side effects associated to CB₁ receptors. In this purpose, a new series of 3-carboxamido-5-aryl-isoxazoles, never described previously as CB₂ receptor agonists, was designed, synthesized and evaluated for their biological activity. The pharmacological results have identified great selective CB₂ agonists with in vivo anti-inflammatory activity in a DSS-induced acute colitis mouse model.     

The G protein-coupled cannabinoid-1 (CB1) receptor of mammalian brain: Inhibition by phthalate esters in vitro

This research examines the in vitro interaction of phthalate diesters and monoesters with the G protein-coupled cannabinoid 1 (CB₁) receptor, a presynaptic complex involved in the regulation of synaptic activity in mammalian brain. The diesters, n-butylbenzylphthalate (nBBP), di-n-hexylphthalate (DnHP), di-n-butylphthalate (DnBP), di-2-ethylhexylphthalate (DEHP), di-isooctylphthalate (DiOP) and di-n-octylphthalate (DnOP) inhibited the specific binding of the CB₁ receptor agonist [³H]CP-55940 to mouse whole brain membranes at micromolar concentrations (IC₅₀s: nBBP 27.4 μM; DnHP 33.9 μM; DnBP 45.9 μM; DEHP 47.4 μM; DiOP 55.4 μM; DnOP 75.2 μM). DnHP, DnBP and nBBP achieved full (or close to full) blockade of [³H]CP-55940 binding, whereas DEHP, DiOP and DnOP produced partial (55-70%) inhibition. Binding experiments with phenylmethane-sulfonylfluoride (PMSF) indicated that the ester linkages of nBBP and DnBP remain intact during assay. The monoesters mono-2-ethylhexylphthalate (M2EHP) and mono-isohexylphthalate (MiHP) failed to reach IC₅₀ at 150 μM and mono-n-butylphthalate (MnBP) was inactive. Inhibitory potencies in the [³H]CP-55940 binding assay were positively correlated with inhibition of CB₁ receptor agonist-stimulated binding of [³⁵S]GTPγS to the G protein, demonstrating that phthalates cause functional impairment of this complex. DnBP, nBBP and DEHP also inhibited binding of [³H]SR141716A, whereas inhibition with MiHP was comparatively weak and MnBP had no effect. Equilibrium binding experiments with [³H]SR141716A showed that phthalates reduce the B_max of radioligand without changing its K_d. DnBP and nBBP also rapidly enhanced the dissociation of [³H]SR141716A. Our data are consistent with an allosteric mechanism for inhibition, with phthalates acting as relatively low affinity antagonists of CB₁ receptors and cannabinoid agonist-dependent activation of the G-protein. Further studies are warranted, since some phthalate esters may have potential to modify CB₁ receptor-dependent behavioral and physiological outcomes in the whole animal.     

Histone Modifications Are Associated with Δ9-Tetrahydrocannabinol-mediated Alterations in Antigen-specific T Cell Responses

Marijuana is one of the most abused drugs due to its psychotropic effects. Interestingly, it is also used for medicinal purposes. The main psychotropic component in marijuana, Δ⁹-tetrahydrocannabinol (THC), has also been shown to mediate potent anti-inflammatory properties. Whether the immunomodulatory activity of THC is mediated by epigenetic regulation has not been investigated previously. In this study, we employed ChIP-Seq technology to examine the in vivo effect of THC on global histone methylation in lymph node cells of mice immunized with a superantigen, staphylococcal enterotoxin B. We compared genome-wide histone H3 Lys-4, Lys-27, Lys-9, and Lys-36 trimethylation and histone H3 Lys-9 acetylation patterns in such cells exposed to THC or vehicle. Our results showed that THC treatment leads to the association of active histone modification signals to Th2 cytokine genes and suppressive modification signals to Th1 cytokine genes, indicating that such a mechanism may play a critical role in the THC-mediated switch from Th1 to Th2. At the global level, a significant portion of histone methylation and acetylation regions were altered by THC. However, the overall distribution of these histone methylation signals among the genomic features was not altered significantly by THC, suggesting that THC activates the expression of a subset of genes while suppressing the expression of another subset of genes through histone modification. Functional classification of these histone marker-associated genes showed that these differentially associated genes were involved in various cellular functions, from cell cycle regulation to metabolism, suggesting that THC had a pleiotropic effect on gene expression in immune cells. Altogether, the current study demonstrates for the first time that THC may modulate immune response through epigenetic regulation involving histone modifications.