共查询到20条相似文献,搜索用时 9 毫秒
1.
Poliovirus RNA utilizes eIF2 for the initiation of translation in cell free systems. Remarkably, we now describe that poliovirus translation takes place at late times of infection when eIF2 is inactivated by phosphorylation. By contrast, translation directed by poliovirus RNA is blocked when eIF2 is inactivated at earlier times. Thus, poliovirus RNA translation exhibits a dual mechanism for the initiation of protein synthesis as regards to the requirement for eIF2. Analysis of individual poliovirus non-structural proteins indicates that the presence of 2A(pro) alone is sufficient to provide eIF2 independence for IRES-driven translation. This effect is not observed with a 2A(pro) variant unable to cleave eIF4G. The level of 2A(pro) synthesized in culture cells is crucial for obtaining eIF2 independence. Expression of the N-or C-terminus fragments of eIF4G did not stimulate IRES-driven translation, nor provide eIF2 independence, consistent with the idea that the presence of 2A(pro) at high concentrations is necessary. The finding that 2A(pro) provides eIF2-independent translation opens a new and unsuspected area of research in the field of picornavirus protein synthesis. 相似文献
2.
3.
Translation of most mRNAs is suppressed under stress conditions. Phosphorylation of the α-subunit of eukaryotic translation initiation factor 2 (eIF2), which delivers initiator tRNA (Met-tRNA(i)) to the P site of the 40S ribosomal subunit, is responsible for such translational suppression. However, translation of hepatitis C viral (HCV) mRNA is refractory to the inhibitory effects of eIF2α phosphorylation, which prevents translation by disrupting formation of the eIF2-GTP-Met-tRNA(i) ternary complex. Here, we report that eIF2A, an alternative initiator tRNA-binding protein, has a key role in the translation of HCV mRNA during HCV infection, in turn promoting eIF2α phosphorylation by activating the eIF2α kinase PKR. Direct interaction of eIF2A with the IIId domain of the HCV internal ribosome entry site (IRES) is required for eIF2A-dependent translation. These data indicate that stress-independent translation of HCV mRNA occurs by recruitment of eIF2A to the HCV IRES via direct interaction with the IIId domain and subsequent loading of Met-tRNA(i) to the P site of the 40S ribosomal subunit. 相似文献
4.
5.
《Cell cycle (Georgetown, Tex.)》2013,12(11):1387-1389
The eukaryotic initiation factor 4E (eIF4E) is a key regulator of protein translation whose function is activated by the Akt and Ras proto-oncogenic signal transduction pathways. eIF4E enhances the translation of mRNAs encoding several genes involved in tumorigenesis and acts as a proto-oncogene, in vitro, when overexpressed in immortalized cells. Importantly, eIF4E is frequently found overexpressed in human cancers of multiple histological origins. However, in vivo evidence of the eIF4E neoplastic potential was lacking until now. Here we discuss recent findings that demonstrate eIF4E’s oncogenic role in vivo through direct genetic approaches in the mouse, and identify novel oncogenic functions for this initiation factor in cooperative tumorigenesis and response to therapy. 相似文献
6.
Overexpression and activation of the c-Src protein have been linked to the development of a wide variety of cancers. The molecular mechanism(s) of c-Src overexpression in cancer cells is not clear. We report here an internal ribosome entry site (IRES) in the c-Src mRNA that is constituted by both 5′-noncoding and -coding regions. The inhibition of cap-dependent translation by m7GDP in the cell-free translation system or induction of endoplasmic reticulum stress in hepatoma-derived cells resulted in stimulation of the c-Src IRES activities. Sucrose density gradient analyses revealed formation of a stable binary complex between the c-Src IRES and purified HeLa 40 S ribosomal subunit in the absence of initiation factors. We further demonstrate eIF2-independent assembly of 80 S initiation complex on the c-Src IRES. These features of the c-Src IRES appear to be reminiscent of that of hepatitis C virus-like IRESs and translation initiation in prokaryotes. Transfection studies and genetic analysis revealed that the c-Src IRES permitted initiation at the authentic AUG351, which is also used for conventional translation initiation of the c-Src mRNA. Our studies unveiled a novel regulatory mechanism of c-Src synthesis mediated by an IRES element, which exhibits enhanced activity during cellular stress and is likely to cause c-Src overexpression during oncogenesis and metastasis. 相似文献
7.
8.
Vesicular stomatitis virus mRNAs from three of the four bands fractionated by polyacrylamide gel electrophoresis in 99% formamide have been eluted from gels and translated in the Krebs II ascites cell-free system. Band 2 mRNA (0.7 times 10-6 daltons) directed the synthesis of the protein moiety of the glycoprotein (G), and band 3 (0.55 times 10-6 daltons) coded for the nucleocapsid (N) protein. Band 4 mRNA (o.28 times 10-6 daltons) directed the synthesis of the NS and matrix (M) proteins. The authenticity of viral proteins synthesized in vitro was shown by sodium dodecyl sulfate-polyacrylamide gel electrophoresis and by analysis of (35-S)metionine-labeled tryptic peptides. These results are consistent with the complexity analysis and coding capacities for the vesicular stomatitis virus mRNA species presented in the accompanying paper. 相似文献
9.
Translation inhibition in apoptosis: caspase-dependent PKR activation and eIF2-alpha phosphorylation 总被引:7,自引:0,他引:7
The protein kinase PKR is a major player in the cellular antiviral response, acting mainly by phosphorylation of the alpha-subunit of the eukaryotic translation initiation factor 2 (eIF2-alpha) to block de novo protein synthesis. PKR activation requires binding of double-stranded RNA or PACT/RAX proteins to its regulatory domain. Since several reports have demonstrated that translation is inhibited in apoptosis, we investigated whether PKR and eIF2-alpha phosphorylation contribute to this process. We show that PKR is proteolysed and that eIF2-alpha is phosphorylated at the early stages of apoptosis induced by various stimuli. Both events coincide with the onset of caspase activity and are prevented by caspase inhibitors. Using site-directed mutagenesis we show that PKR is specifically proteolysed at Asp(251) during cellular apoptosis. This site is cleaved in vitro by recombinant caspase-3, caspase-7, and caspase-8 and not by the proinflammatory caspase-1 and caspase-11. The released kinase domain efficiently phosphorylates eIF2-alpha at the cognate Ser(51) residue, and its overexpression in mammalian cells impairs the translation of its own mRNA and of reporter mRNAs. Our results demonstrate a new and caspase-dependent activation mode for PKR, leading to eIF2-alpha phosphorylation and translation inhibition in apoptosis. 相似文献
10.
Natalia Redondo Miguel Angel Sanz Jutta Steinberger Tim Skern Yuri Kusov Luis Carrasco 《PloS one》2012,7(12)
Translation directed by several picornavirus IRES elements can usually take place after cleavage of eIF4G by picornavirus proteases 2Apro or Lpro. The hepatitis A virus (HAV) IRES is thought to be an exception to this rule because it requires intact eIF4F complex for translation. In line with previous results we report that poliovirus (PV) 2Apro strongly blocks protein synthesis directed by HAV IRES. However, in contrast to previous findings we now demonstrate that eIF4G cleavage by foot-and-mouth disease virus (FMDV) Lpro strongly stimulates HAV IRES-driven translation. Thus, this is the first observation that 2Apro and Lpro exhibit opposite effects to what was previously thought to be the case in HAV IRES. This effect has been observed both in hamster BHK and human hepatoma Huh7 cells. In addition, this stimulation of translation is also observed in cell free systems after addition of purified Lpro. Notably, in presence of this FMDV protease, translation directed by HAV IRES takes place when eIF2α has been inactivated by phosphorylation. Our present findings clearly demonstrate that protein synthesis directed by HAV IRES can occur when eIF4G has been cleaved and after inactivation of eIF2. Therefore, translation directed by HAV IRES without intact eIF4G and active eIF2 is similar to that observed with other picornavirus IRESs. 相似文献
11.
LeFebvre AK Korneeva NL Trutschl M Cvek U Duzan RD Bradley CA Hershey JW Rhoads RE 《The Journal of biological chemistry》2006,281(32):22917-22932
eIF3 in mammals is the largest translation initiation factor ( approximately 800 kDa) and is composed of 13 nonidentical subunits designated eIF3a-m. The role of mammalian eIF3 in assembly of the 48 S complex occurs through high affinity binding to eIF4G. Interactions of eIF4G with eIF4E, eIF4A, eIF3, poly(A)-binding protein, and Mnk1/2 have been mapped to discrete domains on eIF4G, and conversely, the eIF4G-binding sites on all but one of these ligands have been determined. The only eIF4G ligand for which this has not been determined is eIF3. In this study, we have sought to identify the mammalian eIF3 subunit(s) that directly interact(s) with eIF4G. Established procedures for detecting protein-protein interactions gave ambiguous results. However, binding of partially proteolyzed HeLa eIF3 to the eIF3-binding domain of human eIF4G-1, followed by high throughput analysis of mass spectrometric data with a novel peptide matching algorithm, identified a single subunit, eIF3e (p48/Int-6). In addition, recombinant FLAG-eIF3e specifically competed with HeLa eIF3 for binding to eIF4G in vitro. Adding FLAG-eIF3e to a cell-free translation system (i) inhibited protein synthesis, (ii) caused a shift of mRNA from heavy to light polysomes, (iii) inhibited cap-dependent translation more severely than translation dependent on the HCV or CSFV internal ribosome entry sites, which do not require eIF4G, and (iv) caused a dramatic loss of eIF4G and eIF2alpha from complexes sedimenting at approximately 40 S. These data suggest a specific, direct, and functional interaction of eIF3e with eIF4G during the process of cap-dependent translation initiation, although they do not rule out participation of other eIF3 subunits. 相似文献
12.
Poliovirus (PV) 2A protease (2A(Pro)) cleaves eukaryotic initiation factors 4GI and 4GII (eIF4GI and eIF4GII) within virus-infected cells, effectively halting cap-dependent mRNA translation. PV mRNA, which does not possess a 5' cap, is translated via cap-independent mechanisms within viral protease-modified messenger ribonucleoprotein (mRNP) complexes. In this study, we determined that 2A(Pro) activity was required for viral polysome formation and stability. 2A(Pro) cleaved eIF4GI and eIF4GII as PV polysomes assembled. A 2A(Cys109Ser) (2A(Pro) with a Cys109Ser mutation) protease active site mutation that prevented cleavage of eIF4G coordinately inhibited the de novo formation of viral polysomes, the stability of viral polysomes, and the stability of PV mRNA within polysomes. 2A(Cys109Ser)-associated defects in PV mRNA and polysome stability correlated with defects in PV mRNA translation. 3C(Pro) activity was not required for viral polysome formation or stability. 2A(Pro)-mediated cleavage of eIF4G along with poly(rC) binding protein binding to the 5' terminus of uncapped PV mRNA appear to be concerted mechanisms that allow PV mRNA to form mRNP complexes that evade cellular mRNA degradation machinery. 相似文献
13.
14.
Laura K. Mayberry M. Leah Allen Michael D. Dennis Karen S. Browning 《Plant physiology》2009,150(4):1844-1854
Expansins are cell wall proteins associated with the process of plant growth. However, investigations in which expansin gene expression has been manipulated throughout the plant have often led to inconclusive results. In this article, we report on a series of experiments in which overexpression of expansin was targeted to specific phases of leaf growth using an inducible promoter system. The data indicate that there is a restricted window of sensitivity when increased expansin gene expression leads to increased endogenous expansin activity and an increase in leaf growth. This phase of maximum expansin efficacy corresponds to the mid phase of leaf growth. We propose that the effectiveness of expansin action depends on the presence of other modulating factors in the leaf and we suggest that it is the control of expression of these factors (in conjunction with expansin gene expression) that defines the extent of leaf growth. These data help to explain some of the previously observed variation in growth response following manipulation of expansin gene expression and highlight a potential linkage of the expression of modifiers of expansin activity with the process of exit from cell division.Expansins were initially identified as cell wall proteins that had the ability to promote the extension of plant tissue in vitro (McQueen-Mason et al., 1992). Further work on these proteins and the genes encoding them has revealed a picture in which, although a general correlation with growth has often been substantiated, it is clear that control of growth is a much more complex process than the control of expression of a single protein type (for review, see Cosgrove, 2000; Lee et al., 2001; Li et al., 2003). In addition, although it is clear that expansins play a role in many growth processes, there are a number of open questions about exactly how expansins contribute to these processes. First, we still have a very limited understanding of the molecular mechanism of expansin action. Efforts to identify classical enzymatic activities associated with expansins have proven fruitless (McQueen-Mason and Cosgrove, 1995; Li and Cosgrove, 2001) and the remaining, somewhat speculative, interpretation is that expansins intercalate within carbohydrate matrices in the cell wall, leading to transient loosening of noncovalent interactions and, thus, the ability of these matrices to move relative to each other (McQueen-Mason and Cosgrove., 1994). In addition, by unlocking aspects of the molecular architecture of the cell wall, expansins may allow access of other cell wall proteins/enzymes to particular substrates. Depending on the nature of these other proteins/enzymes, expansin activity could thus be associated not only with growth processes, but also with cell wall modifications linked with differentiation. Such a mechanism would help to explain observations (described below) that the effectiveness of expansin action appears to be context dependent and is not only associated with changes in plant growth but also with differentiation.Various analyses have revealed that expansins are present in a wide range of plants, including bryophytes, ferns, angiosperms, and conifers (Hutchison et al., 1999; Kim et al., 2000; Schipper et al., 2002). Moreover, they are generally encoded by relatively large gene families whose members often show distinct patterns of gene expression (Kende et al., 2004). Some of these expression patterns correlate with growth processes, such as root growth (Wu et al., 1996), internode growth (Cho and Kende, 1997), leaf growth (Muller et al., 2007), and cotton (Gossypium hirsutum) fiber growth (Ruan et al., 2001), whereas others correlate with events of differentiation, such as fruit ripening (Rose et al., 1997; Brummell et al., 1999b), grass tiller formation (Reidy et al., 2001), and endosperm breakdown (Chen and Bradford, 2000). In addition, some novel nonplant expansin activities have been identified that suggest that pathogens may induce altered cell wall structure via an expansin-mediated mechanism (Qin et al., 2004). Since in vitro assays have suggested that the activities of expansins extracted from different sources tend to be similar (Cosgrove, 2000), it has been proposed that this tissue, organ, and environmental specificity of expression pattern reflects a specialized role for expansins in specific contexts rather than any major difference in activity of the protein. As stated above, this specific function may depend on the presence (or absence) of tissue-specific cofactors, the nature of which is as yet unclear.In addition to biochemical approaches to understanding expansin function, numerous groups have undertaken transgenic experiments to alter expansin gene expression in plants to observe the outcome on plant phenotype. Although some successes with antisense strategies have been reported (Brummell et al., 1999a; Cho and Cosgrove, 2000), the encoding of expansin by large gene families means that genetic redundancy poses a significant problem for such approaches (e.g. Schipper et al., 2002). Simple overexpression strategies to alter expansin activity may also be difficult to interpret. For example, when expansins were constitutively overexpressed throughout Arabidopsis (Arabidopsis thaliana), tomato (Solanum lycopersicum), and rice (Oryza sativa) plants, the outcomes tended to be pleiotropic, including a decrease in overall plant growth (Cho and Cosgrove, 2000; Rochange et al., 2001; Choi et al., 2003). However, when altered expansin expression was targeted more specifically to a particular tissue or organ, then more easily interpretable results were obtained. For example, when altered expansin expression was directed to the developing leaf petiole in Arabidopsis, altered leaf growth was observed (Cho and Cosgrove, 2000), consistent with the idea that expansins promote growth, and when inducible expression of expansin was targeted throughout rice plants, quantitative changes in growth were observed (Choi et al., 2003). The results of these experiments indicate that expansin gene expression can be used as a tool to modulate growth, but that the timing and spatial extent of expression can have a significant influence on the phenotype observed. Again, these data support the hypothesis that the effectiveness of expansin in promoting specific growth or differentiation events is dependent on the presence of particular tissue- or developmental-specific cofactors. So far, little progress has been made on the identification and characterization of these cofactors.In previous work, we reported on the characterization of transgenic lines of tobacco (Nicotiana tabacum) in which a cucumber (Cucumis sativus) expansin (CsEXP1) could be induced by application of a chemical inducer (anhydrotetracycline [Ahtet]). In these experiments, we targeted expansin overexpression to localized regions of either the shoot apical meristem or very young leaf primordia, which led to localized promotion of growth (Pien et al., 2001), consistent with the idea that expansins play a role in the endogenous mechanism of leaf initiation (Reinhardt et al., 1998). However, when inductions were performed throughout the plant the resulting phenotypes were variable and difficult to interpret (S. Pien and A. Fleming, unpublished data), in line with other reports (Rochange et al., 2001). To investigate the possibility that this variable response reflected a differential sensitivity to expansin in different tissues at different stages of development, we performed a series of experiments (reported here) in which overexpression of expansin was targeted to specific stages of leaf growth. Our data indicate that the efficacy of expansin action depends on the presence of other factors that are present in a developmentally controlled fashion, so that increased expansin gene expression is only effective in promoting leaf growth during a specific developmental period of leaf growth. This period corresponds to the inflection point of relative growth rate (RGR) and, thus, to the phase of maximum leaf growth rate. An intriguing article by Cookson et al. (2005) reported on potential correlations between various parameters of leaf growth and final leaf size. They found that the best predictor of final leaf size was the maximum value of absolute leaf growth rate. Thus, the experiments reported here identify a novel, developmental control of expansin efficacy in the regulation of leaf growth, investigate the reported correlation between maximal leaf expansion rate and leaf size, and provide an insight into potential means of controlling leaf growth. 相似文献
15.
Akiko Yanagiya Yuri V. Svitkin Shoichiro Shibata Satoshi Mikami Hiroaki Imataka Nahum Sonenberg 《Molecular and cellular biology》2009,29(6):1661-1669
Eukaryotic mRNAs possess a 5′-terminal cap structure (cap), m7GpppN, which facilitates ribosome binding. The cap is bound by eukaryotic translation initiation factor 4F (eIF4F), which is composed of eIF4E, eIF4G, and eIF4A. eIF4E is the cap-binding subunit, eIF4A is an RNA helicase, and eIF4G is a scaffolding protein that bridges between the mRNA and ribosome. eIF4G contains an RNA-binding domain, which was suggested to stimulate eIF4E interaction with the cap in mammals. In Saccharomyces cerevisiae, however, such an effect was not observed. Here, we used recombinant proteins to reconstitute the cap binding of the mammalian eIF4E-eIF4GI complex to investigate the importance of the RNA-binding region of eIF4GI for cap interaction with eIF4E. We demonstrate that chemical cross-linking of eIF4E to the cap structure is dramatically enhanced by eIF4GI fragments possessing RNA-binding activity. Furthermore, the fusion of RNA recognition motif 1 (RRM1) of the La autoantigen to the N terminus of eIF4GI confers enhanced association between the cap structure and eIF4E. These results demonstrate that eIF4GI serves to anchor eIF4E to the mRNA and enhance its interaction with the cap structure.The cap structure, m7GpppN, is present at the 5′ terminus of all nuclear transcribed eukaryotic mRNAs. Cap-dependent binding of the ribosome to mRNA is mediated by the cap-binding protein eukaryotic translation initiation factor 4E (eIF4E), which forms a complex termed eIF4F together with eIF4G and eIF4A. Mammalian eIF4G, which has two isoforms, eIF4GI and eIF4GII, is a modular, multifunctional protein that binds to poly(A)-binding protein (PABP) (14) and eIF4E (18, 20) via the N-terminal third region. Mammalian eIF4G binds to eIF4A and eIF3 (15) via the middle third region and to eIF4A and Mnk protein kinase at the C-terminal region. eIF4GI also possesses an RNA-binding sequence (2, 9, 33) in the middle region. There are two RNA-binding sites on eIF4GI; one is located amino terminal to the first HEAT domain, and the other is located within the first HEAT domain (23). Mammalian and Saccharomyces cerevisiae eIF4E are similar in size (24 kDa), but mammalian eIF4GI (220 kDa) is larger than its yeast counterpart (150 kDa), as the latter lacks a C-terminal domain corresponding to mammalian eIF4GI (38).The affinity of eIF4E for the cap structure has been a matter of dispute for some time. The earlier works of Carberry et al. (4) and Ueda et al. (39) estimated the equilibrium dissociation constant (Kd) of the eIF4E-cap complex by fluorescence titration to be 2 × 10−6 to 5 × 10−6 M depending on the nature of the cap analog. Later on, development of a new methodology for the fluorescence titration experiments yielded Kd values of 10−7 to 10−8 (29, 41). The source of the difference with the previous reports was thoroughly analyzed (29, 30). The interaction between the cap structure and eIF4E is dramatically enhanced by eIF4GI. This was first reported by showing that cross-linking of mammalian eIF4E to the cap structure is more efficient when it is a subunit of the eIF4F complex (19) or when it is complexed to eIF4GI (11). A similar enhancement of the binding of eIF4E to the cap structure was observed in yeast (40). However, two very different mechanisms were proposed to explain these observations. For the mammalian system, it was postulated that the middle segment of eIF4GI, which binds RNA, stabilizes the eIF4E interaction with the cap structure (11). This model was based primarily on the finding that in poliovirus-infected cells, eIF4GI is cleaved between its N-terminal third and the middle third, and consequently, eIF4E remains attached to the N-terminal eIF4GI fragment lacking the RNA-binding region. Under these conditions, cross-linking of eIF4E to the cap structure was poor (19, 31). In contrast, in yeast, a strong interaction between the cap structure and eIF4E was achieved using an eIF4G fragment containing the eIF4E-binding site that lacks the RNA-binding region (34, 40). Also, the yeast eIF4G fragment from amino acids 393 to 490 (fragment 393-490), which does not contain the RNA-binding site, forms a right-handed helical ring that wraps around the N terminus of eIF4E. This conformational change was suggested in turn to engender an allosteric enhancement of the association of eIF4E with the cap structure (10). Such an interaction between mammalian eIF4GI and eIF4E has not been reported.To understand the mechanism by which eIF4GI stimulates the interaction of eIF4E with the cap structure in mammals, we reconstituted the eIF4E-cap recognition activity in vitro with purified eIF4E and eIF4GI recombinant proteins. Using a chemical cross-linking assay, we demonstrate that only mammalian eIF4GI fragments possessing RNA-binding activity enhance the cross-linking of eIF4E to the cap structure. Our data provide new insight into the mechanism of cap recognition by the eIF4E-eIF4GI complex. 相似文献
16.
17.
Suragani RN Kamindla R Ehtesham NZ Ramaiah KV 《Biochemical and biophysical research communications》2005,338(4):1766-1772
The heterotrimeric eukaryotic initiation factor 2 (eIF2) plays a critical role in the mechanics and regulation of protein synthesis. Unlike yeast and archaeal eIF2, the purified baculovirus-expressed recombinant human eIF2 subunits used in these studies reveal that the alpha- and beta-subunits interact with each other. Consistent with this observation, the beta-subunit specifically interacts with the purified eIF2B in ELISA studies and this interaction is enhanced when wt eIF2alpha in the recombinant trimeric complex is phosphorylated or replaced by a mutant phosphomimetic eIF2alpha (S51D). These findings together with other observations raise the possibility that the beta-subunit plays a key role in the regulation and function of mammalian eIF2 complex. PERK, an eIF2alpha kinase, is found to interact with wt and mutants of eIF2alpha in which the serine 51 or 48 residue is replaced by alanine or aspartic acid thereby suggesting that the phosphorylation site in the substrate is not important for interaction. Fluorescence spectroscopic and fluorescence resonance energy transfer analyses reveal that the energy transfer occurs from PERK to eIF2alpha. The dissociation constant of alpha-subunit-PERK complex (Kd alpha-subunit) is 0.74 microM and the interaction is stoichiometric. 相似文献
18.
Potyviral VPg enhances viral RNA Translation and inhibits reporter mRNA translation in planta 总被引:1,自引:0,他引:1
Viral protein genome-linked (VPg) plays a central role in several stages of potyvirus infection. This study sought to answer questions about the role of Potato virus A (PVA; genus Potyvirus) VPg in viral and host RNA expression. When expressed in Nicotiana benthamiana leaves in trans, a dual role of VPg in translation is observed. It repressed the expression of monocistronic luciferase (luc) mRNA and simultaneously induced a significant upregulation in the expression of both replicating and nonreplicating PVA RNAs. This enhanced viral gene expression was due at least to the 5' untranslated region (UTR) of PVA RNA, eukaryotic initiation factors 4E and iso 4E [eIF4E/eIF(iso)4E], and the presence of a sufficient amount of VPg. Coexpression of VPg with viral RNA increased the viral RNA amount, which was not the case with the monocistronic mRNA. Both mutations at certain lysine residues in PVA VPg and eIF4E/eIF(iso)4E depletion reduced its ability to upregulate the viral RNA expression. These modifications were also involved in VPg-mediated downregulation of monocistronic luc expression. These results suggest that VPg can titrate eIF4Es from capped monocistronic RNAs. Because VPg-mediated enhancement of viral gene expression required eIF4Es, it is possible that VPg directs eIF4Es to promote viral RNA expression. From this study it is evident that VPg can serve as a specific regulator of PVA expression by boosting the viral RNA amounts as well as the accumulation of viral translation products. Such a mechanism could function to protect viral RNA from being degraded and to secure efficient production of coat protein (CP) for virion formation. 相似文献
19.
Jagpreet S. Nanda Adesh K. Saini Antonio M. Mu?oz Alan G. Hinnebusch Jon R. Lorsch 《The Journal of biological chemistry》2013,288(8):5316-5329
Accurate recognition of the start codon in an mRNA by the eukaryotic translation preinitiation complex (PIC) is essential for proper gene expression. The process is mediated by eukaryotic translation initiation factors (eIFs) in conjunction with the 40 S ribosomal subunit and (initiator) tRNAi. Here, we provide evidence that the C-terminal tail (CTT) of eIF1A, which we previously implicated in start codon recognition, moves closer to the N-terminal domain of eIF5 when the PIC encounters an AUG codon. Importantly, this movement is coupled to dissociation of eIF1 from the PIC, a critical event in start codon recognition, and is dependent on the scanning enhancer elements in the eIF1A CTT. The data further indicate that eIF1 dissociation must be accompanied by the movement of the eIF1A CTT toward eIF5 in order to trigger release of phosphate from eIF2, which converts the latter to its GDP-bound state. Our results also suggest that release of eIF1 from the PIC and movement of the CTT of eIF1A are triggered by the same event, most likely accommodation of tRNAi in the P site of the 40 S subunit driven by base pairing between the start codon in the mRNA and the anticodon in tRNAi. Finally, we show that the C-terminal domain of eIF5 is responsible for the factor''s activity in antagonizing eIF1 binding to the PIC. Together, our data provide a more complete picture of the chain of molecular events that is triggered when the scanning PIC encounters an AUG start codon in the mRNA. 相似文献
20.
Eukaryotic translation initiation factor 4E (eIF4E) is the cap‐binding protein that binds the 5′ cap structure of cellular messenger RNAs (mRNAs). Despite the obligatory role of eIF4E in cap‐dependent mRNA translation, how the translation activity of eIF4E is controlled remains largely undefined. Here, we report that mammalian eIF4E is regulated by SUMO1 (small ubiquitin‐related modifier 1) conjugation. eIF4E sumoylation promotes the formation of the active eIF4F translation initiation complex and induces the translation of a subset of proteins that are essential for cell proliferation and preventing apoptosis. Furthermore, disruption of eIF4E sumoylation inhibits eIF4E‐dependent protein translation and abrogates the oncogenic and antiapoptotic functions associated with eIF4E. These data indicate that sumoylation is a new fundamental regulatory mechanism of protein synthesis. Our findings suggest further that eIF4E sumoylation might be important in promoting human cancers. 相似文献