Eicosanoids inhibit the G-protein-gated inwardly rectifying potassium channel (Kir3) at the Na+/PIP2 gating site

We previously showed that activation of the human endothelin A receptor (HETAR) by endothelin-1 (Et-1) selectively inhibits the response to mu opioid receptor (MOR) activation of the G-protein-gated inwardly rectifying potassium channel (Kir3). The Et-1 effect resulted from PLA2 production of an eicosanoid that inhibited Kir3. In this study, we show that Kir3 inhibition by eicosanoids is channel subunit-specific, and we identify the site within the channel required for arachidonic acid sensitivity. Activation of the G-protein-coupled MOR by the selective opioid agonist D-Ala(2)Glyol, enkephalin, released Gbetagamma that activated Kir3. The response to MOR activation was significantly inhibited by Et-1 activation of HETAR in homomeric channels composed of either Kir3.2 or Kir3.4. In contrast, homomeric channels of Kir3.1 were substantially less sensitive. Domain deletion and channel chimera studies suggested that the sites within the channel required for Et-1-induced inhibition were within the region responsible for channel gating. Mutation of a single amino acid in the homomeric Kir3.1 to produce Kir3.1(F137S)(N217D) dramatically increased the channel sensitivity to arachidonic acid and Et-1 treatment. Complementary mutation of the equivalent amino acid in Kir3.4 to produce Kir3.4(S143T)(D223N) significantly reduced the sensitivity of the channel to arachidonic acid- and Et-1-induced inhibition. The critical aspartate residue required for eicosanoid sensitivity is the same residue required for Na(+) regulation of PIP(2) gating. The results suggest a model of Kir3 gating that incorporates a series of regulatory steps, including Gbetagamma, PIP(2), Na(+), and arachidonic acid binding to the channel gating domain.     

Molecular mechanisms mediating inhibition of G protein-coupled inwardly-rectifying K+ channels

Neuronal G protein-coupled inwardly-rectifying potassium channels (GIRKs, Kir3.x) can be activated or inhibited by distinct classes of receptors (Galphai/o and Galphaq/11-coupled, respectively), providing dynamic regulation of neuronal excitability. In this mini-review, we highlight findings from our laboratory in which we used a mammalian heterologous expression system to address mechanisms of GIRK channel regulation by Galpha and Gbetagamma subunits. We found that, like beta1- and beta2-containing Gbetagamma dimers, GIRK channels are also activated by G protein betagamma dimers containing beta3 and beta4 subunits. By contrast, GIRK currents are inhibited by beta5-containing Gbetagamma dimers and/or by Galpha proteins of the Galphaq/11 family. The properties of Gbeta5-mediated inhibition suggest that beta5-containing Gbetagamma dimers act as competitive antagonists of other activating Gbetagamma pairs on GIRK channels. Inhibition of GIRK channels by Galpha subunits is specific to members of the Galphaq/11 family and appears to result, at least in part, from activation of phospholipase C (PLC) and the resultant decrease in membrane levels of phosphatidylinositol-4,5-bisphosphate (PIP2), an endogenous co-factor necessary for GIRK channel activity; this Galphaq/11 activated mechanism is largely responsible for receptor-mediated GIRK channel inhibition.     

Novel signalling events mediated by muscarinic receptor subtypes

The M2 muscarinic acetylcholine receptor (mAChR) activates Gi protein coupled pathways, such as stimulation of G-protein activated inwardly rectifying K channels (GIRKs). Here we report a novel heterologous desensitization of these GIRK currents, which appeared to be specifically induced by M2/M4 mAChR stimulation, but not via adenosine (Ado) and alpha2-adrenergic receptors (AR). This heterologous desensitization reflected an inhibition of the GIRK signalling pathway downstream of G-protein activation. It was mediated in a membrane-delimited fashion via a PTX insensitive GTP dependent pathway and could be competed with exogenous Gbetagamma. The activation of M3 mAChR/Gq coupled receptors potently inhibited GIRK currents similar as M2 mAChR. By monitoring simultaneously the response of A1 adenosine receptor (AdoR) activation on N-type Ca2+ channels and GIRK channels, the stimulation of M3 mAChR was found to cause an inhibition of the Ado response in both effector systems, suggesting that the inhibition occurred at the level of the G-protein common to both effectors. These results indicated that Gq proteins inhibit pathways that are commonly regulated by Gbetagamma proteins.     

Galphai1 and Galphai3 differentially interact with, and regulate, the G protein-activated K+ channel

G protein-activated K(+) channels (GIRKs; Kir3) are activated by direct binding of Gbetagamma subunits released from heterotrimeric G proteins. In native tissues, only pertussis toxin-sensitive G proteins of the G(i/o) family, preferably Galpha(i3) and Galpha(i2), are donors of Gbetagamma for GIRK. How this specificity is achieved is not known. Here, using a pull-down method, we confirmed the presence of Galpha(i3-GDP) binding site in the N terminus of GIRK1 and identified novel binding sites in the N terminus of GIRK2 and in the C termini of GIRK1 and GIRK2. The non-hydrolyzable GTP analog, guanosine 5'-3-O-(thio)triphosphate, reduced the binding of Galpha(i3) by a factor of 2-4. Galpha(i1-GDP) bound to GIRK1 and GIRK2 much weaker than Galpha(i3-GDP). Titrated expression of components of signaling pathway in Xenopus oocytes and their activation by m2 muscarinic receptors revealed that G(i3) activates GIRK more efficiently than G(i1), as indicated by larger and faster agonist-evoked currents. Activation of GIRK by purified Gbetagamma in excised membrane patches was strongly augmented by coexpression of Galpha(i3) and less by Galpha(i1). Differences in physical interactions of GIRK with GDP-bound Galpha subunits, or Galphabetagamma heterotrimers, may dictate different extents of Galphabetagamma anchoring, influence the efficiency of GIRK activation by Gbetagamma, and play a role in determining signaling specificity.     

Molecular determinants for activation of G-protein-coupled inward rectifier K+ (GIRK) channels by extracellular acidosis

Synaptic cleft acidification occurs following vesicle release. Such a pH change may affect synaptic transmissions in which G-protein-coupled inward rectifier K(+) (GIRK) channels play a role. To elucidate the effect of extracellular pH (pH(o)) on GIRK channels, we performed experiments on heteromeric GIRK1/GIRK4 channels expressed in Xenopus oocytes. A decrease in pH(o) to 6.2 augmented GIRK1/GIRK4 currents by approximately 30%. The channel activation was reversible and dependent on pH(o) levels. This effect was produced by selective augmentation of single channel conductance without change in the open-state probability. To determine which subunit was involved, we took advantage of homomeric expression of GIRK1 and GIRK4 by introducing a single mutation. We found that homomeric GIRK1-F137S and GIRK4-S143T channels were activated at pH(o) 6.2 by approximately 20 and approximately 70%, respectively. Such activation was eliminated when a histidine residue in the M1-H5 linker was mutated to a non-titratable glutamine, i.e. H116Q in GIRK1 and H120Q in GIRK4. Both of these histidines were required for pH sensing of the heteromeric channels, because the mutation of one of them diminished but not abolished the pH(o) sensitivity. The pH(o) sensitivity of the heteromeric channels was completely lost when both were mutated. Thus, these results suggest that the GIRK-mediated synaptic transmission is determined by both neurotransmitter and protons with the transmitter accounting for only 70% of the effect on postsynaptic cell and protons released together with the transmitter contributing to the other 30%.     

Mechanosensitivity of GIRK channels is mediated by protein kinase C-dependent channel-phosphatidylinositol 4,5-bisphosphate interaction

Gprotein-activated inwardly rectifying K+ channel (GIRK or Kir3) currents are inhibited by mechanical stretch of the cell membrane, but the underlying mechanisms are not understood. In Xenopus oocytes heterologously expressing GIRK channels, membrane stretch induced by 50% reduction of osmotic pressure caused a prompt reduction of GIRK1/4, GIRK1, and GIRK4 currents by 16.6-42.6%. Comparable GIRK current reduction was produced by protein kinase C (PKC) activation (phorbol 12-myristate 13-acetate). The mechanosensitivity of the GIRK4 current was abolished by pretreatment with PKC inhibitors (staurosporine or calphostin C). Neither hypo-osmotic challenge nor PKC activation affected IRK1 currents. GIRK4 chimera (GIRK4-IRK1-(Lys207-Leu245)) and single point mutant (GIRK4(I229L)), in which the phosphatidylinositol 4,5-bisphosphate (PIP2) binding domain or residue was replaced by the corresponding region of IRK1 to strengthen the channel-PIP2 interaction, showed no mechanosensitivity and minimal PKC sensitivity. IRK1 gained mechanosensitivity and PKC sensitivity by reverse double point mutation of the PIP2 binding domain (L222I/R213Q). Overexpression of Gbetagamma, which is known to strengthen the channel-PIP2 interaction, attenuated the mechanosensitivity of GIRK4 channels. In oocytes expressing a pleckstrin homology domain of PLC-delta tagged with green fluorescent protein, hypo-osmotic challenge or PKC activation caused a translocation of the fluorescence signal from the cell membrane to the cytosol, reflecting PIP2 hydrolysis. The translocation was prevented by pretreatment with PKC inhibitors. Involvement of PKC activation in the mechanosensitivity of muscarinic K+ channels was confirmed in native rabbit atrial myocytes. These results suggest that the mechanosensitivity of GIRK channels is mediated primarily by channel-PIP2 interaction, with PKC playing an important role in modulating the interaction probably through PIP2 hydrolysis.     

Gbetagamma-dependent and Gbetagamma-independent basal activity of G protein-activated K+ channels

Cardiac and neuronal G protein-activated K+ channels (GIRK; Kir3) open following the binding of Gbetagamma subunits, released from Gi/o proteins activated by neurotransmitters. GIRKs also possess basal activity contributing to the resting potential in neurons. It appears to depend largely on free Gbetagamma, but a Gbetagamma-independent component has also been envisaged. We investigated Gbetagamma dependence of the basal GIRK activity (A(GIRK,basal)) quantitatively, by titrated expression of Gbetagamma scavengers, in Xenopus oocytes expressing GIRK1/2 channels and muscarinic m2 receptors. The widely used Gbetagamma scavenger, myristoylated C terminus of beta-adrenergic kinase (m-cbetaARK), reduced A(GIRK,basal) by 70-80% and eliminated the acetylcholine-evoked current (I(ACh)). However, we found that m-cbetaARK directly binds to GIRK, complicating the interpretation of physiological data. Among several newly constructed Gbetagamma scavengers, phosducin with an added myristoylation signal (m-phosducin) was most efficient in reducing GIRK currents. m-phosducin relocated to the membrane fraction and did not bind GIRK. Titrated expression of m-phosducin caused a reduction of A(GIRK,basal) by up to 90%. Expression of GIRK was accompanied by an increase in the level of Gbetagamma and Galpha in the plasma membrane, supporting the existence of preformed complexes of GIRK with G protein subunits. Increased expression of Gbetagamma and its constitutive association with GIRK may underlie the excessively high A(GIRK,basal) observed at high expression levels of GIRK. Only 10-15% of A(GIRK,basal) persisted upon expression of both m-phosducin and cbetaARK. These results demonstrate that a major part of Ibasal is Gbetagamma-dependent at all levels of channel expression, and only a small fraction (<10%) may be Gbetagamma-independent.     

The Stoichiometry of Gbeta gamma binding to G-protein-regulated inwardly rectifying K+ channels (GIRKs)

G-protein-coupled inwardly rectifying K(+) (GIRK; Kir3.x) channels are the primary effectors of numerous G-protein-coupled receptors. GIRK channels decrease cellular excitability by hyperpolarizing the membrane potential in cardiac cells, neurons, and secretory cells. Although direct regulation of GIRKs by the heterotrimeric G-protein subunit Gbetagamma has been extensively studied, little is known about the number of Gbetagamma binding sites per channel. Here we demonstrate that purified GIRK (Kir 3.x) tetramers can be chemically cross-linked to exogenously purified Gbetagamma subunits. The observed laddering pattern of Gbetagamma attachment to GIRK4 homotetramers was consistent with the binding of one, two, three, or four Gbetagamma molecules per channel tetramer. The fraction of channels chemically cross-linked to four Gbetagamma molecules increased with increasing Gbetagamma concentrations and approached saturation. These results suggest that GIRK tetrameric channels have four Gbetagamma binding sites. Thus, GIRK (Kir 3.x) channels, like the distantly related cyclic nucleotide-gated channels, are tetramers and exhibit a 1:1 subunit/ligand binding stoichiometry.     

Inhibition of G-protein-coupled inward rectifying K+ channels by intracellular acidosis

G-protein-coupled inward rectification K(+) (GIRK) channels play an important role in modulation of synaptic transmission and cellular excitability. The GIRK channels are regulated by diverse intra- and extracellular signaling molecules. Previously, we have shown that GIRK1/GIRK4 channels are activated by extracellular protons. The channel activation depends on a histidine residue in the M1-H5 linker and may play a role in neurotransmission. Here, we show evidence that the heteromeric GIRK1/GIRK4 channels are inhibited by intracellular acidification. This inhibition was produced by selective decrease in the channel open probability with a modest drop in the single-channel conductance. The inhibition does not seem to require G-proteins as it was seen in two G-protein coupling-defective GIRK mutants and in excised patches in the absence of exogenous G-proteins. Three histidine residues in intracellular domains were critical for the inhibition. Individual mutation of His-64, His-228, or His-352 in GIRK4 abolished or greatly diminished the inhibition in homomeric GIRK4. Mutations of any of these histidine residues in GIRK4 or their counterparts in GIRK1 were sufficient to eliminate the pH(i) sensitivity of the heteromeric GIRK1/GIRK4 channels. Thus, the molecular and biophysical bases for the inhibition of GIRK channels by intracellular protons are illustrated. Because of the inequality of the pH(i) and pH(o) in most cells and their relatively independent controls by cellular versus systemic mechanisms, such pH(i) sensitivity may allow these channels to regulate cellular excitability in certain physiological and pathophysiological conditions when intracellular acidosis occurs.     

Mapping the Gbetagamma-binding sites in GIRK1 and GIRK2 subunits of the G protein-activated K+ channel

G protein-activated K+ channels (Kir3 or GIRK) are activated by direct binding of Gbetagamma. The binding sites of Gbetagamma in the ubiquitous GIRK1 (Kir3.1) subunit have not been unequivocally charted, and in the neuronal GIRK2 (Kir3.2) subunit the binding of Gbetagamma has not been studied. We verified and extended the map of Gbetagamma-binding sites in GIRK1 by using two approaches: direct binding of Gbetagamma to fragments of GIRK subunits (pull down), and competition of these fragments with the Galphai1 subunit for binding to Gbetagamma. We also mapped the Gbetagamma-binding sites in GIRK2. In both subunits, the N terminus binds Gbetagamma. In the C terminus, the Gbetagamma-binding sites in the two subunits are not identical; GIRK1, but not GIRK2, has a previously unrecognized Gbetagamma-interacting segments in the first half of the C terminus. The main C-terminal Gbetagamma-binding segment found in both subunits is located approximately between amino acids 320 and 409 (by GIRK1 count). Mutation of C-terminal leucines 262 or 333 in GIRK1, recognized previously as crucial for Gbetagamma regulation of the channel, and of the corresponding leucines 273 and 344 in GIRK2 dramatically altered the properties of K+ currents via GIRK1/GIRK2 channels expressed in Xenopus oocytes but did not appreciably reduce the binding of Gbetagamma to the corresponding fusion proteins, indicating that these residues are mainly important for the regulation of Gbetagamma-induced changes in channel gating rather than Gbetagamma binding.     

Gbeta residues that do not interact with Galpha underlie agonist-independent activity of K+ channels.

Gbetagamma subunits interact directly and activate G protein-gated Inwardly Rectifying K(+) (GIRK) channels. Little is known about the identity of functionally important interactions between Gbetagamma and GIRK channels. We tested the effects of all mammalian Gbeta subunits on channel activity and showed that whereas Gbeta1-4 subunits activate heteromeric GIRK channels independently of receptor activation, Gbeta5 does not. Gbeta1 and Gbeta5 both bind the N and C termini of the GIRK1 and GIRK4 channel subunits. Chimeric analysis between the Gbeta1 and Gbeta5 proteins revealed a 90-amino acid stretch that spans blades two and three of the seven-propeller structure and is required for channel activation. Within this region, eight non-conserved amino acids were critical for the activity of Gbeta1, as mutation of each residue to its counterpart in Gbeta5 significantly reduced the ability of Gbeta1 to stimulate channel activity. In particular, mutation of residues Ser-67 and Thr-128 to the corresponding Gbeta5 residues completely abolished Gbeta1 stimulation of GIRK channel activity. Mapping these functionally important residues on the three-dimensional structure of Gbeta1 shows that Ser-67, Ser-98, and Thr-128 are the only surface accessible residues. Galpha(i)1 interacts with Ser-98 but not with Ser-67 and Thr-128 in the heterotrimeric Galphabetagamma structure. Further characterization of the three mutant proteins showed that they fold properly and interact with Ggamma2. Of the three identified functionally important residues, the Ser-67 and Thr-128 Gbeta mutants significantly inhibited basal currents of a channel point mutant that displays Gbetagamma-mediated basal but not agonist-induced currents. Our findings indicate that the presence of Gbeta residues that do not interact with Galpha are involved in Gbetagamma interactions in the absence of agonist stimulation.     

A novel small-molecule selective activator of homomeric GIRK4 channels

G protein–sensitive inwardly rectifying potassium (GIRK) channels are important pharmaceutical targets for neuronal, cardiac, and endocrine diseases. Although a number of GIRK channel modulators have been discovered in recent years, most lack selectivity. GIRK channels function as either homomeric (i.e., GIRK2 and GIRK4) or heteromeric (e.g., GIRK1/2, GIRK1/4, and GIRK2/3) tetramers. Activators, such as ML297, ivermectin, and GAT1508, have been shown to activate heteromeric GIRK1/2 channels better than GIRK1/4 channels with varying degrees of selectivity but not homomeric GIRK2 and GIRK4 channels. In addition, VU0529331 was discovered as the first homomeric GIRK channel activator, but it shows weak selectivity for GIRK2 over GIRK4 (or G4) homomeric channels. Here, we report the first highly selective small-molecule activator targeting GIRK4 homomeric channels, 3hi2one-G4 (3-[2-(3,4-dimethoxyphenyl)-2-oxoethyl]-3-hydroxy-1-(1-naphthylmethyl)-1,3-dihydro-2H-indol-2-one). We show that 3hi2one-G4 does not activate GIRK2, GIRK1/2, or GIRK1/4 channels. Using molecular modeling, mutagenesis, and electrophysiology, we analyzed the binding site of 3hi2one-G4 formed by the transmembrane 1, transmembrane 2, and slide helix regions of the GIRK4 channel, near the phosphatidylinositol-4,5-bisphosphate binding site, and show that it causes channel activation by strengthening channel–phosphatidylinositol-4,5-bisphosphate interactions. We also identify slide helix residue L77 in GIRK4, corresponding to residue I82 in GIRK2, as a major determinant of isoform-specific selectivity. We propose that 3hi2one-G4 could serve as a useful pharmaceutical probe in studying GIRK4 channel function and may also be pursued in drug optimization studies to tackle GIRK4-related diseases such as primary aldosteronism and late-onset obesity.     

The sensitivity of G protein-activated K+ channels toward halothane is essentially determined by the C terminus

G protein-activated K(+) channels (GIRKs or Kir3.x) are targets for the volatile anesthetic, halothane. When coexpressed with the m(2) acetylcholine (ACh) receptor in Xenopus oocytes, agonist-activated GIRK1(F137S)- and GIRK2-mediated currents are inhibited by halothane, whereas in the absence of ACh, high concentrations of halothane induce GIRK1(F137S)-mediated currents. To elucidate the molecular mechanism of halothane action on GIRK currents of different subunit compositions, we constructed deletion mutants of GIRK1(F137S) (GIRK1(Delta363*)) and GIRK2 (GIRK2(Delta356)) lacking the C-terminal ends, as well as chimeric GIRK channels. Mutated GIRK channels showed normal currents when activated by ACh but exhibited different pharmacological properties toward halothane. GIRK2(Delta356) showed no sensitivity against the inhibitory action of halothane but was activated by halothane in the absence of an agonist. GIRK1(Delta363*) was activated by halothane more efficiently. Currents mediated by chimeric channels were inhibited by anesthetic concentrations that were at least 30-fold lower than those necessary to decrease GIRK2 wild type currents. Glutathione S-transferase pulldown experiments did not show displacement of bound Gbetagamma by halothane, indicating that halothane does not interfere with Gbetagamma binding. Single channel experiments revealed an influence of halothane on the gating of the channels: The agonist-induced currents of GIRK1 and GIRK2, carried mainly by brief openings, were inhibited, whereas higher concentrations of the anesthetic promoted long openings of GIRK1 channels. Because the C terminus is crucial for these effects, an interaction of halothane with the channel seems to be involved in the mechanism of current modulation.     

Inhibition of a Gi-activated potassium channel (GIRK1/4) by the Gq-coupled m1 muscarinic acetylcholine receptor

The G protein-coupled inwardly rectifying K+ channel, GIRK1/GIRK4, can be activated by receptors coupled to the Galpha(i) subunit. An opposing role for Galpha(q) receptor signaling in GIRK regulation has only recently begun to be established. We have studied the effects of m1 muscarinic acetylcholine receptor (mAChR) stimulation, which is known to mobilize calcium and activate protein kinase C (PKC) by a Galpha(q)-dependent mechanism, on whole cell GIRK1/4 currents in Xenopus oocytes. We found that stimulation of the m1 mAChR suppresses both basal and dopamine 2 receptor-activated GIRK 1/4 currents. Overexpression of Gbetagamma subunits attenuates this effect, suggesting that increased binding of Gbetagamma to the GIRK channel can effectively compete with the G(q)-mediated inhibitory signal. This G(q) signal requires the use of second messenger molecules; pharmacology implicates a role for PKC and Ca2+ responses as m1 mAChR-mediated inhibition of GIRK channels is mimicked by PMA and Ca2+ ionophore. We have analyzed a series of mutant and chimeric channels suggesting that the GIRK4 subunit is capable of responding to G(q) signals and that the resulting current inhibition does not occur via phosphorylation of a canonical PKC site on the channel itself.     

Na+ promotes the dissociation between Galpha GDP and Gbeta gamma,activating G protein-gated K+ channels

G protein-gated K(+) channels (GIRK, or Kir3) are activated by the direct binding of Gbetagamma or of cytosolic Na(+). Na(+) activation is fast, Gbetagamma-independent, and probably via a direct, low affinity (EC(50), 30-40 mm) binding of Na(+) to the channel. Here we demonstrate that an increase in intracellular Na(+) concentration, [Na(+)](in), within the physiological range (5-20 mm), activates GIRK within minutes via an additional, slow mechanism. The slow activation is observed in GIRK mutants lacking the direct Na(+) effect. It is inhibited by a Gbetagamma scavenger, hence it is Gbetagamma-dependent; but it does not require GTP. We hypothesized that Na(+) elevates the cellular concentration of free Gbetagamma by promoting the dissociation of the Galphabetagamma heterotrimer into free Galpha(GDP) and Gbetagamma. Direct biochemical measurements showed that Na(+) causes a moderate decrease (approximately 2-fold) in the affinity of interaction between Galpha(GDP) and Gbetagamma. Furthermore, in accord with the predictions of our model, slow Na(+) activation was enhanced by mild coexpression of Galpha(i3). Our findings reveal a previously unknown mechanism of regulation of G proteins and demonstrate a novel Gbetagamma-dependent regulation of GIRK by Na(+). We propose that Na(+) may act as a regulatory factor, or even a second messenger, that regulates effectors via Gbetagamma.     

Synergistic activation of G protein-gated inwardly rectifying potassium channels by the betagamma subunits of G proteins and Na(+) and Mg(2+) ions.

Native and recombinant G protein-gated inwardly rectifying potassium (GIRK) channels are directly activated by the betagamma subunits of GTP-binding (G) proteins. The presence of phosphatidylinositol-bis-phosphate (PIP(2)) is required for G protein activation. Formation (via hydrolysis of ATP) of endogenous PIP(2) or application of exogenous PIP(2) increases the mean open time of GIRK channels and sensitizes them to gating by internal Na(+) ions. In the present study, we show that the activity of ATP- or PIP(2)-modified channels could also be stimulated by intracellular Mg(2+) ions. In addition, Mg(2+) ions reduced the single-channel conductance of GIRK channels, independently of their gating ability. Both Na(+) and Mg(2+) ions exert their gating effects independently of each other or of the activation by the G(betagamma) subunits. At high levels of PIP(2), synergistic interactions among Na(+), Mg(2+), and G(betagamma) subunits resulted in severalfold stimulated levels of channel activity. Changes in ionic concentrations and/or G protein subunits in the local environment of these K(+) channels could provide a rapid amplification mechanism for generation of graded activity, thereby adjusting the level of excitability of the cells.     

Dominant-negative mutants identify a role for GIRK channels in D3 dopamine receptor-mediated regulation of spontaneous secretory activity

The human D3 dopamine receptor can activate G-protein-coupled inward rectifier potassium channels (GIRKs), inhibit P/Q-type calcium channels, and inhibit spontaneous secretory activity in AtT-20 neuroendocrine cells (Kuzhikandathil, E.V., W. Yu, and G.S. Oxford. 1998. Mol. Cell. Neurosci. 12:390-402; Kuzhikandathil, E.V., and G.S. Oxford. 1999. J. Neurosci. 19:1698-1707). In this study, we evaluate the role of GIRKs in the D3 receptor-mediated inhibition of secretory activity in AtT-20 cells. The absence of selective blockers for GIRKs has precluded a direct test of the hypothesis that they play an important role in inhibiting secretory activity. However, the tetrameric structure of these channels provides a means of disrupting endogenous GIRK function using a dominant negative approach. To develop a dominant-negative GIRK mutant, the K(+) selectivity amino acid sequence -GYG- in the putative pore domain of the human GIRK2 channels was mutated to -AAA-, -GLG-, or -GFG-. While the mutation of -GYG- to -GFG- did not affect channel function, both the -AAA- and -GLG- GIRK2 mutants were nonfunctional. This suggests that the aromatic ring of the tyrosine residue rather than its hydroxyl group is involved in maintaining the pore architecture of human GIRK2 channels. When expressed in AtT-20 cells, the nonfunctional AAA-GIRK2 and GLG-GIRK2 acted as effective dominant-negative mutants and significantly attenuated endogenous GIRK currents. Furthermore, these dominant-negative mutants interfered with the D3 receptor-mediated inhibition of secretion in AtT-20 cells, suggesting they are centrally involved in the signaling pathway of this secretory response. These results indicate that dominant-negative GIRK mutants are effective molecular tools to examine the role of GIRK channels in vivo.     

A Conserved Aspartic Acid Is Important for Agonist (VUAA1) and Odorant/Tuning Receptor-Dependent Activation of the Insect Odorant Co-Receptor (Orco)

Insect odorant receptors function as heteromeric odorant-gated cation channels comprising a conventional odorant-sensitive tuning receptor, and a conserved co-receptor (Orco). An Orco agonist, VUAA1, is able to activate both heteromeric and homomeric Orco-containing channels. Very little is known about specific residues in Orco that contribute to cation permeability and gating. We investigated the importance of two conserved Asp residues, one in each of transmembrane domains 5 and 7, for channel function by mutagenesis. Drosophila melanogaster Orco and its substitution mutants were expressed in HEK cells and VUAA1-stimulated channel activity was determined by Ca²⁺ influx and whole-cell patch clamp electrophysiology. Substitution of D466 in transmembrane 7 with amino acids other than glutamic acid resulted in a substantial reduction in channel activity. The D466E Orco substitution mutant was ∼2 times more sensitive to VUAA1. The permeability of the D466E Orco mutant to cations was unchanged relative to wild-type Orco. When D466E Orco is co-expressed with a conventional tuning odorant receptor, the heteromeric complex also shows increased sensitivity to an odorant. Thus, the effect of the D466E mutation is not specific to VUAA1 agonism or dependent on homomeric Orco assembly. We suggest the gain-of-activation characteristic of the D466E mutant identifies an amino acid that is likely to be important for activation of both heteromeric and homomeric insect odorant receptor channels.     

Regulation of the inward rectifying properties of G-protein-activated inwardly rectifying K+ (GIRK) channels by Gbeta gamma subunits

Gbetagamma subunits are known to bind to and activate G-protein-activated inwardly rectifying K(+) channels (GIRK) by regulating their open probability and bursting behavior. Studying G-protein regulation of either native GIRK (I(KACh)) channels in feline atrial myocytes or heterologously expressed GIRK1/4 channels in Chinese hamster ovary cells and HEK 293 cells uncovered a novel Gbetagamma subunit mediated regulation of the inwardly rectifying properties of these channels. I(KACh) activated by submaximal concentrations of acetylcholine exhibited a approximately 2.5-fold stronger inward rectification than I(KACh) activated by saturating concentrations of acetylcholine. Similarly, the inward rectification of currents through GIRK1/4 channels expressed in HEK cells was substantially weakened upon maximal stimulation with co-expressed Gbetagamma subunits. Analysis of the outward current block underlying inward rectification demonstrated that the fraction of instantaneously blocked channels was reduced when Gbetagamma was over-expressed. The Gbetagamma induced weakening of inward rectification was associated with reduced potencies for Ba(2+) and Cs(+) to block channels from the extracellular side. Based on these results we propose that saturation of the channel with Gbetagamma leads to a conformational change within the pore of the channel that reduced the potency of extracellular cations to block the pore and increased the fraction of channels inert to a pore block in outward direction.     

Control of pH and PIP2 gating in heteromeric Kir4.1/Kir5.1 channels by H-Bonding at the helix-bundle crossing

Inhibition by intracellular H(+) (pH gating) and activation by phosphoinositides such as PIP(2) (PIP(2)-gating) are key regulatory mechanisms in the physiology of inwardly-rectifying potassium (Kir) channels. Our recent findings suggest that PIP(2) gating and pH gating are controlled by an intra-subunit H-bond at the helix-bundle crossing between a lysine in TM1 and a backbone carbonyl group in TM2. This interaction only occurs in the closed state and channel opening requires this H-bond to be broken, thereby influencing the kinetics of PIP(2) and pH gating in Kir channels. In this addendum, we explore the role of H-bonding in heteromeric Kir4.1/Kir5.1 channels. Kir5.1 subunits do not possess a TM1 lysine. However, homology modelling and molecular dynamics simulations demonstrate that the TM1 lysine in Kir4.1 is capable of H-bonding at the helix-bundle crossing. Consistent with this, the rates of pH and PIP2 gating in Kir4.1/Kir5.1 channels (two H-bonds) were intermediate between those of wild-type homomeric Kir4.1 (four H-bonds) and Kir4.1(K67M) channels (no H-bonds) suggesting that the number of H-bonds in the tetrameric channel complex determines the gating kinetics. Furthermore, in heteromeric Kir4.1(K67M)/Kir5.1 channels, where the two remaining H-bonds are disrupted, we found that the gating kinetics were similar to Kir4.1(K67M) homomeric channels despite the fact that these two channels differ considerably in their PIP(2) affinities. This indicates that Kir channel PIP(2) affinity has little impact on either the PIP(2) or pH gating kinetics.