G蛋白偶联受体相关分选蛋白功能特征与相关疾病研究进展

G蛋白偶联受体(G protein-coupled receptors,GPCRs)作为最大的一类膜蛋白受体家族,可被多种配体激活并发挥相应的信号转导功能,参与生物体内重要的生理过程.G蛋白偶联受体相关分选蛋白(G protein-coupled receptors associated sorting protein...     

味觉信号的通用编码途径

味觉对于辨别甜味、苦味、酸味、咸味和鲜味 (氨基酸味 )有重要的作用。最近 ,利用遗传学、生物信息学、表达克隆等手段克隆了哺乳动物的味觉受体。甜味和鲜味是由Ｔ1Ｒ家族的三个Ｇ蛋白偶联受体介导的。苦味主要由Ｔ2Ｒ家族约 30个Ｇ蛋白偶联受体所介导。ＴＲＰＭ5是一种新近从味觉细胞中克隆的基因 ,属于ＴＲＰ钙离子通道家族。形态学研究结果表明 ,ＴＲＰＭ5与Ｔ1Ｒ或Ｔ2Ｒ受体共存 ,并且证明ＴＲＰＭ5可以被味觉受体通过磷脂酶Ｃ(ＰＬＣ)所激活。ＴＲＰＭ5或者ＰＬＣβ2基因敲除的小鼠表现出甜味、苦味和鲜味味觉缺失 ,但不影响其酸味和…     

植物病原丝状真菌G蛋白偶联受体的研究进展

通过对丝状真菌G蛋白偶联受体(GPCR)的结构、分类以及功能方面进行综述,以期明确丝状真菌与其他模式生物GPCR之间的关系。基于已报道的模式生物及丝状真菌等不同生物中的GPCR,通过SMART保守结构域分析,以及利用Clustal X、MEGA等软件对上述GPCR进行遗传关系分析。明确丝状真菌典型GPCR具有七跨膜结构域,新型GPCR则含有PIPK、RGS等保守结构域,明确不同学者对于GPCR的分类情况,以及新型GPCR所具有的特殊功能,明确模式生物GPCR、丝状真菌GPCR分别各自聚类。丝状真菌中GPCR的数量较模式生物少,不同分类单元中真菌之间GPCR的数量也不尽相同,同时,丝状真菌GPCR除具有典型的七跨膜结构域外,还含有一些其他保守的结构域,上述研究为进一步开展其功能研究提供重要的理论基础。     

G蛋白偶联受体二聚化研究进展

G蛋白偶联受体是细胞膜受体最大的家族,参与调节多种生理过程,在信号识别及转导中具有重要作用,传统观点认为G蛋白偶联受体作为单体起作用,近年来,越来越多的证据表明,G蛋白偶联受体不仅能以二聚体形式存在,而且在细胞信号转导中起重要作用,尤其是对阿片受体异源二聚体的研究,推动了这一领域的研究。本文综述了G蛋白偶联受体二聚化研究进展,以及同源和异源二聚体的结构与功能。     

G蛋白偶联受体激酶的调控

G蛋白偶联受体激酶(G protein-coupled receptor kinase,GRK)特异地使活化的G蛋白偶联受体(G protein-coupled receptor,GPCR)发生磷酸化及脱敏化,从而终止后者介导的信号转导通路。研究表明,GRK的功能被高度调控,并具有下行调节GPCR的能力。调控GRK功能的机制包括两个层次：(1)多种途径调控激酶的亚细胞定位及活性,包括GPCR介导、G蛋白偶联、磷脂作用、Ca^2 结合蛋白调控、蛋白激酶C活化、MAPK反馈抑制、小窝蛋白抑制等;(2)调控GRK表达水平,主要体现在其与某些疾病的联系。     

甘丙肽受体的研究进展

目前已经克隆了3种甘丙肽受体（GalR1, GalR2, GalR3）,它们都是与G蛋白相偶联的受体.3种甘丙肽受体的氨基酸序列、药理学特性以及第二信使系统各不相同.GalR1/3受体可以抑制腺苷酸环化酶并可以激活钾通道,GalR2受体可以激活磷脂酶C并增加胞内钙离子浓度.用RNA印迹、反转录PCR以及原位杂交等技术对上述3种甘丙肽受体在人、大鼠和小鼠中的分布进行了研究,发现它们具有不同的分布特征,提示不同的甘丙肽受体可能参与不同的生理过程.     

果蝇气味受体复合物Or22a-Or83b研究进展

昆虫的气味受体长久以来被认为是一种G蛋白偶联受体,遵循从线虫到人类的通用模式.但最近的研究显示,果蝇的气味探测与一种蛋白复合体有关,该复合体由一个调节型气味受体,例如Or22a,加上离子通道Or83b,构成一个反转的G蛋白偶联受体构象.调节型气味Or22a受体结合气体分子产生第二信使,并促使Or83b进一步作用.基于此结构基础,揭示出了昆虫气味探测与相关反应的新模式和机理.     

孤儿G蛋白偶联受体研究进展

孤儿G蛋白偶联受体的研究意味着发现其尚未了解的内源性配体,是后基因组时代功能基因组学研究的热点之一,对生命科学的发展具有深 影响。本文介绍孤儿G蛋白偶联受体的概念、研究策略及其应用。     

G蛋白偶联受体的研究进展

G蛋白偶联受体（GPCRs）,是体内最大的蛋白质超家族。GPCRs的基本结构巳清楚,但高分辨率的三维结构还未得到。根据结构的同源性,GPCRs主要分为A、B、C3族。GPCRs配体的多样性决定配体结合域的多样性。受体分子内相互作用力的破坏,质子化,构象变化,与G蛋白的偶联以及受体二聚化参与了GPCRs的活化过程。GPCRs的活化模式有3种;二态模式、多态模式和顺序结合的构象选择模式。     

受体活性修饰蛋白研究进展

受体活性修饰蛋白(receptor activity-modifying proteins,RAMPs)属于单跨膜蛋白家族,分三个结构域,RAMP的N端和跨膜区决定本身的功能和受体表型,胞内C端对于配体的信号传导和受体循环有重要作用。目前发现有三个成员:RAMP1、RAMP2和RAMP3。RAMPs通过改变G蛋白偶联受体的糖基化,作用于配体结合区域来调节受体表型。RAMP1与降钙素受体样受体(calcitonin receptor like receptor,CRLR)结合表现出降钙素基因相关肽(calcitonin gene-related peptide,CGRP)受体表型:RAMP2和RAMP3与CRLR结合则对肾上腺髓质素(adrenomedullin,AM)表现高亲和力,与降钙素受体(calcitonin receptor,CTR)结合则作为胰淀粉样酶(amylin,AMY)受体。由此可见,RAMPs不仅调节受体与配体结合,还影响细胞内的蛋白相互作用调节细胞内信号传导来影响细胞的增殖、迁移、分化等生物学特性。RAMPs还对心血管系统的病理生理有重要调节作用。     

苦味受体与甜味、鲜味受体具有不同的进化途径

通过生物信息学和系统发育学分析,研究了苦味受体和甜味／鲜味受体的进化途径。结果显示,苦味受体和甜味／鲜味受体在进化上具有远相关,并且具有不同的进化途径,提示这可能是导致这些受体具有不同功能,传导不同味觉的原因。     

From G Protein-coupled Receptor Structure Resolution to Rational Drug Design

A number of recent technical solutions have led to significant advances in G protein-coupled receptor (GPCR) structural biology. Apart from a detailed mechanistic view of receptor activation, the new structures have revealed novel ligand binding sites. Together, these insights provide avenues for rational drug design to modulate the activities of these important drug targets. The application of structural data to GPCR drug discovery ushers in an exciting era with the potential to improve existing drugs and discover new ones. In this review, we focus on technical solutions that have accelerated GPCR crystallography as well as some of the salient findings from structures that are relevant to drug discovery. Finally, we outline some of the approaches used in GPCR structure based drug design.     

Regulation of Oligomeric Organization of the Serotonin 5-Hydroxytryptamine 2C (5-HT2C) Receptor Observed by Spatial Intensity Distribution Analysis

The questions of whether G protein-coupled receptors exist as monomers, dimers, and/or oligomers and if these species interconvert in a ligand-dependent manner are among the most contentious current issues in biology. When employing spatial intensity distribution analysis to laser scanning confocal microscope images of cells stably expressing either a plasma membrane-associated form of monomeric enhanced green fluorescent protein (eGFP) or a tandem version of this fluorophore, the eGFP tandem was identified as a dimer. Similar studies on cells stably expressing an eGFP-tagged form of the epidermal growth factor receptor demonstrated that, although largely a monomer in the basal state, this receptor rapidly became predominantly dimeric upon the addition of its ligand epidermal growth factor. In cells induced to express an eGFP-tagged form of the serotonin 5-hydroxytryptamine 2C (5-HT_2C) receptor, global analysis of construct quantal brightness was consistent with the predominant form of the receptor being dimeric. However, detailed spatial intensity distribution analysis demonstrated the presence of multiple forms ranging from monomers to higher-order oligomers. Furthermore, treatment with chemically distinct 5-HT_2C receptor antagonists resulted in a time-dependent change in the quaternary organization to one in which there was a preponderance of receptor monomers. This antagonist-mediated effect was reversible, because washout of the ligand resulted in the regeneration of many of the oligomeric forms of the receptor.     

CC趋化因子偶联受体信号途径

Thechemokinesareafamilyofproinflammatorycytokinesthatactthroughcellsurfacereceptorstoregulatenumerousroutinephysiologicalandpathophysiologicalprocesses,includinghematopoiesis,T cellactivation ,angiogenesis,inflammatorydiseasesaswellasHIV 1infection[1,2 ].Thesesmallpeptidesaretypicallycomposedof 70 - 1 30aminoacidsandarecharacterizedbythepresenceoftwodisulphidebondsformedbetweenfourconservedcysteineresidues.Chemokinesareclassifiedintofoursubfamiliesaccordingtothepatternofconservedcysteinesinth…     

Disruption of Rhodopsin Dimerization with Synthetic Peptides Targeting an Interaction Interface

Although homo- and heterodimerizations of G protein-coupled receptors (GPCRs) are well documented, GPCR monomers are able to assemble in different ways, thus causing variations in the interactive interface between receptor monomers among different GPCRs. Moreover, the functional consequences of this phenomenon, which remain to be clarified, could be specific for different GPCRs. Synthetic peptides derived from transmembrane (TM) domains can interact with a full-length GPCR, blocking dimer formation and affecting its function. Here we used peptides corresponding to TM helices of bovine rhodopsin (Rho) to investigate the Rho dimer interface and functional consequences of its disruption. Incubation of Rho with TM1, TM2, TM4, and TM5 peptides in rod outer segment (ROS) membranes shifted the resulting detergent-solubilized protein migration through a gel filtration column toward smaller molecular masses with a reduced propensity for dimer formation in a cross-linking reaction. Binding of these TM peptides to Rho was characterized by both mass spectrometry and a label-free assay from which dissociation constants were calculated. A BRET (bioluminescence resonance energy transfer) assay revealed that the physical interaction between Rho molecules expressed in membranes of living cells was blocked by the same four TM peptides identified in our in vitro experiments. Although disruption of the Rho dimer/oligomer had no effect on the rates of G protein activation, binding of G_t to the activated receptor stabilized the dimer. However, TM peptide-induced disruption of dimer/oligomer decreased receptor stability, suggesting that Rho supramolecular organization could be essential for ROS stabilization and receptor trafficking.     

Receptor Activity-modifying Proteins 2 and 3 Generate Adrenomedullin Receptor Subtypes with Distinct Molecular Properties

Adrenomedullin (AM) is a peptide hormone with numerous effects in the vascular systems. AM signals through the AM₁ and AM₂ receptors formed by the obligate heterodimerization of a G protein-coupled receptor, the calcitonin receptor-like receptor (CLR), and receptor activity-modifying proteins 2 and 3 (RAMP2 and RAMP3), respectively. These different CLR-RAMP interactions yield discrete receptor pharmacology and physiological effects. The effective design of therapeutics that target the individual AM receptors is dependent on understanding the molecular details of the effects of RAMPs on CLR. To understand the role of RAMP2 and -3 on the activation and conformation of the CLR subunit of AM receptors, we mutated 68 individual amino acids in the juxtamembrane region of CLR, a key region for activation of AM receptors, and determined the effects on cAMP signaling. Sixteen CLR mutations had differential effects between the AM₁ and AM₂ receptors. Accompanying this, independent molecular modeling of the full-length AM-bound AM₁ and AM₂ receptors predicted differences in the binding pocket and differences in the electrostatic potential of the two AM receptors. Druggability analysis indicated unique features that could be used to develop selective small molecule ligands for each receptor. The interaction of RAMP2 or RAMP3 with CLR induces conformational variation in the juxtamembrane region, yielding distinct binding pockets, probably via an allosteric mechanism. These subtype-specific differences have implications for the design of therapeutics aimed at specific AM receptors and for understanding the mechanisms by which accessory proteins affect G protein-coupled receptor function.     

Agonism,Antagonism, and Inverse Agonism Bias at the Ghrelin Receptor Signaling

The G protein-coupled receptor GHS-R1a mediates ghrelin-induced growth hormone secretion, food intake, and reward-seeking behaviors. GHS-R1a signals through G_q, G_i/o, G₁₃, and arrestin. Biasing GHS-R1a signaling with specific ligands may lead to the development of more selective drugs to treat obesity or addiction with minimal side effects. To delineate ligand selectivity at GHS-R1a signaling, we analyzed in detail the efficacy of a panel of synthetic ligands activating the different pathways associated with GHS-R1a in HEK293T cells. Besides β-arrestin2 recruitment and ERK1/2 phosphorylation, we monitored activation of a large panel of G protein subtypes using a bioluminescence resonance energy transfer-based assay with G protein-activation biosensors. We first found that unlike full agonists, G_q partial agonists were unable to trigger β-arrestin2 recruitment and ERK1/2 phosphorylation. Using G protein-activation biosensors, we then demonstrated that ghrelin promoted activation of G_q, G_i1, G_i2, G_i3, G_oa, G_ob, and G₁₃ but not G_s and G₁₂. Besides, we identified some GHS-R1a ligands that preferentially activated G_q and antagonized ghrelin-mediated G_i/G_o activation. Finally, we unambiguously demonstrated that in addition to G_q, GHS-R1a also promoted constitutive activation of G₁₃. Importantly, we identified some ligands that were selective inverse agonists toward G_q but not of G₁₃. This demonstrates that bias at GHS-R1a signaling can occur not only with regard to agonism but also to inverse agonism. Our data, combined with other in vivo studies, may facilitate the design of drugs selectively targeting individual signaling pathways to treat only the therapeutically relevant function.     

Distinctive Activation Mechanism for Angiotensin Receptor Revealed by a Synthetic Nanobody

1. Download high-res image (297KB)
2. Download full-size image

     

Thematic Minireview Series: New Directions in G Protein-coupled Receptor Pharmacology

Over the past half-century, The Journal of Biological Chemistry has been the venue for many landmark publications on the topic of G protein-coupled receptors (GPCRs, also known as seven-transmembrane receptors). The GPCR superfamily in humans is composed of about 800 members, and is the target of about one-third of all pharmaceuticals. Most of these drugs target a very small subset of GPCRs, and do so by mimicking or competing with endogenous hormones and neurotransmitters. This thematic minireview series examines some emerging trends in GPCR drug discovery. The first article describes efforts to systematically interrogate the human “GPCR-ome,” including more than 150 uncharacterized “orphan” receptors. The second article describes recent efforts to target alternative receptor binding sites with drugs that act as allosteric modulators of orthosteric ligands. The third article describes how the recent expansion of GPCR structures is providing new opportunities for computer-guided drug discovery. Collectively, these three articles provide a roadmap for the most important emerging trends in GPCR pharmacology.