SPERM COMPETITION AND THE EVOLUTION OF NONFERTILIZING SPERM IN MAMMALS

Nonfertilizing sperm with special morphologies have long been known to exist in invertebrates. Until recently, abnormal sperm in mammals were considered errors in production. Now, however, Baker and Bellis (1988, 1989) have proposed that mammalian sperm, like some invertebrate sperm, are polymorphic and adapted to a variety of nonfertilizing roles in sperm competition, including prevention of passage of sperm inseminated by another male. More specifically, their “kamikaze” sperm hypothesis proposes that deformed mammalian sperm are adapted to facilitate the formation and functioning of copulatory plugs (Baker and Bellis, 1988). Here I argue that most, maybe all, mammals are unlikely to produce nonfertilizing sperm. First, mammals might not be able to afford to evolve nonfertilizing sperm, given that a) fertilization is often unlikely despite the huge numbers of sperm produced; b) production of larger numbers of sperm is constrained, presumably because of metabolic costs, evidence for which includes the fact that in species in which sperm morphology and anatomy of the female reproductive tract increase the probability of fertilization, the numbers of sperm produced is lower than in others; and c) selection appears to act against the production of deformed sperm. Second, some of the evidence advanced for the existence of nonfertilizing sperm does not in fact support the idea. Third, accessory gland secretions are sufficient on their own to coagulate semen and produce fully functioning plugs; thus the male that used accessory gland secretions would be at a clear advantage over the male that diluted his fertilizing sperm with “kamikaze” sperm; and indeed, current evidence indicates selection on accessory glands, not sperm morphology, to enhance coagulation of semen. Fourth, predictions made on the basis of the “kamikaze” sperm hypothesis are not supported by quantitative comparisons of data from polyandrous and monandrous primates (i.e., those in which several males mate with a fertile female, and therefore in which sperm competition should be operating, and those in which only one male mates). Although sperm competition is almost certainly more intense in polyandrous genera than in monandrous genera (as indicated by, e.g., more frequent copulations and the production of more sperm per ejaculate from larger spermatogenic organs), polyandrous genera do not produce a greater proportion of deformed (i.e., nonfertilizing) sperm than do monandrous genera, or even necessarily a greater number of deformed sperm; nor a greater variety of sperm sizes—indeed they might produce fewer; nor fewer motile sperm (as might be expected if sperm are selected to stay behind and compete with sperm from subsequent males); and nor larger sperm (as might be expected if sperm are produced for functions other than to reach the egg). In sum, currently available evidence suggests that the function of all mammalian sperm is to fertilize, and that sperm competition in mammals occurs through scramble competition, not contest competition.     

SPERM COMPETITION AND THE EVOLUTION OF NUPTIAL FEEDING BEHAVIOR IN THE CRICKET,GRYLLODES SUPPLICANS (WALKER)

The pattern of sperm predominance in doubly mated female crickets, Gryllodes supplicans, was investigated using a radiation-sterility technique. Female G. supplicans made significant use of sperm from both males in fertilizing eggs; overall, first males to mate enjoyed a small advantage, fertilizing about 60% of the offspring produced subsequent to the second mating. The combined use of the sperm of both males in fertilizing eggs occurred soon after the second mating; evidently, mixing of ejaculates within a female's spermatheca does occur. Male G. supplicans provide females with a nuptial gift, the spermatophylax, which influences the time at which a female removes the externally attached sperm-ampulla; this in turn determines the quantity of sperm that is transferred. Moreover, the degree of sperm precedence achieved by a male may be positively related to the time at which the female removes his sperm ampulla. Thus males, by feeding females, ensure not only that a sufficient number of sperm are transferred to fertilize all of a female's eggs, but also may increase the certainty of their paternity. In mating systems in which females control sperm transfer and paternity is influenced by numbers of sperm (i.e., numerical sperm competition), an increase in prezygotic investment in females may be an adaptive male response.     

SOCIAL SELECTION AND THE EVOLUTION OF ANIMAL SIGNALS

Social selection is presented here as a parallel theory to sexual selection and is defined as a selective force that occurs when individuals change their own social behaviors, responding to signals sent by conspecifics in a way to influence the other individuals' fitness. I analyze the joint evolution of a social signal and behavioral responsiveness to the signal by a quantitative-genetic model. The equilibria of average phenotypes maintained by a balance of social selection and natural selection and their stability are examined for two alternative assumptions on behavioral responsiveness, neutral and adaptive. When behavioral responsiveness is neutral on fitness, a rapid evolution by runaway selection occurs only with enough genetic covariance between the signal and responsiveness. The condition for rapid evolution also depends on natural selection and the number of interacting individuals. When signals convey some information on signalers (e.g., fighting ability), behavioral responsiveness is adaptive such that a receiver's fitness is also influenced by the signal. Here there is a single point of equilibrium. The equilibrium point and its stability do not depend on the genetic correlation. The condition needed for evolution is that the signal is beneficial for receivers, which results from reliability of the signal. Frequency-dependent selection on responsiveness has almost no influence on the equilibrium and the rate of evolution.     

MALE MATE CHOICE AND THE EVOLUTION OF FEMALE PLUMAGE COLORATION IN THE HOUSE FINCH

The house finch (Carpodacus mexicanus) is a sexually dichromatic passerine in which males display colorful plumage and females are generally drab brown. Some females, however, have a subdued version of the same pattern of ornamental coloration seen in males. In previous research, I found that female house finches use male coloration as an important criterion when choosing mates and that the plumage brightness of males is a reliable indicator of male nest attentiveness. Male house finches invest substantially in the care of young and, like females, stand to gain by choosing high-quality mates. I therefore hypothesized that a female's plumage brightness might be correlated with her quality and be the basis for male mate choice. In laboratory mate choice experiments, male house finches showed a significant preference for the most brightly plumaged females presented. Observations of a wild population of house finches, however, suggest that female age is the primary criterion in male choice and that female plumage coloration is a secondary criterion. In addition, yearling females tended to have more brightly colored plumage than older females, and there was no relationship between female plumage coloration and overwinter survival, reproductive success, or condition. These observations fail to support the idea that female plumage coloration is an indicator of individual quality. Male mate choice for brightly plumaged females may have evolved as a correlated response to selection on females to choose brightly colored males.     

THE EVOLUTION OF SELECTIVE AGGRESSION CONDITIONED ON ALLORECOGNITION SPECIFICITY

Many sessile cnidarians deploy specialized structures while competing aggressively for living space. The initiation of aggression is often contingent on the relatedness of the interacting contestants; clonemates and close kin generally behave passively toward one another, whereas more distant relatives generally behave aggressively. Behavioral specificity of this sort requires that there be 1) an allorecognition system that can discriminate among subtle differences in cell-surface determinants and 2) a highly polymorphic genetic system that provides specific labels of relatedness (haplotypes or allotypes). The evoutionary models analyzed in this paper show that a population of individuals that behave aggressively only against haplotypically distinct individuals (discriminating phenotypes) will not be evolutionarily stable in the face of either unconditionally aggressive or unconditionally nonaggressive phenotypes. Furthermore, even if the discriminating trait were somehow fixed, the rare recognition alleles necessary to confer allotypic specificity could not become established through natural selection. Thus, allotypic specificity is unlikely to be maintained by individual selection acting directly through aggressive behavior. Other selective mechanisms might account for the evolution of allorecognition specificity. Allotypic polymorphism could be maintained by pleiotropic mechanisms in which rare alleles are favored by natural selection acting either on gametic incompatibility, pathogen resistance, or somatic fusion, rather than aggressive behavior per se. However, these mechanisms do not explain the maintenance of selective aggression based on allotypic differences. Alternatively, if aggressive members of a clone indirectly enhance the reproductive output or survival of the entire clone (or close relatives), then kin selection acting directly through aggressive behavior could favor allorecognition specificity. Choosing among these alternatives will require the development of more sophisticated theory and empirical analyses of the costs and benefits of aggression.