Mammalian diurnality: some facts and gaps

A major factor contributing to the evolution of mammals was their ability to be active during the night, a niche previously underused by terrestrial vertebrates. Diurnality subsequently reemerged multiple times in a variety of independent lineages. This paper reviews some recent data on circadian mechanisms in diurnal mammals and considers general themes that appear to be emerging from this work. Careful examination of behavioral studies suggests that although subtle differences may exist, the fundamental functions of the circadian system are the same, as seems to be the case with respect to the molecular mechanisms of the clock. This suggests that responses to signals originating in the clock must be different, either within the SCN or at its targets or downstream from them. Some features of the SCN vary from species to species, but none of these has been clearly associated with diurnality. The region immediately dorsal to the SCN, which receives substantial input from it, exhibits dramatically different rhythms in nocturnal lab rats and diurnal grass rats. This raises the possibility that it functions as a relay that transforms the signal emitted by the SCN and transmits different patterns to downstream targets in nocturnal and diurnal animals. Other direct targets of the SCN include neurons containing orexin and those containing gonadotropin-releasing hormone, and both of these populations of cells exhibit patterns of rhythmicity that are inverted in at least one diurnal compared to one nocturnal species. The patterns that emerge from the data on diurnality are discussed in terms of the implications they have for the evolution and neural substrates of a day-active way of life.     

Activity Rhythms and Masking Response in the Diurnal Fat Sand Rat Under Laboratory Conditions

Daily rhythms are heavily influenced by light in two major ways. One is through photic entrainment of a circadian clock, and the other is through a more direct process, referred to as masking. Whereas entraining effects of photic stimuli are quite similar in nocturnal and diurnal species, masking is very different. Laboratory conditions differ greatly from what is experienced by individuals in their natural habitat, and several studies have shown that activity patterns can greatly differ between laboratory environment and natural condition. This is especially prevalent in diurnal rodents. We studied the daily rhythms and masking response in the fat sand rat (Psammomys obesus), a diurnal desert rodent, and activity rhythms of Tristram’s jird (Meriones tristrami), a nocturnal member of the same subfamily (Gerbillinae). We found that most sand rats kept on a 12?h:12?h light-dark (LD) cycles at two light intensities (500 and 1000?lux) have a nocturnal phase preferences of general activity and higher body temperature during the dark phase. In most individuals, activity was not as stable that of the nocturnal Tritram’s jirds, which showed a clear and stable nocturnal activity pattern under the same conditions. Sand rats responded to a 6-h phase advance and 6-h phase delay as expected, and, under constant conditions, all tested animals free ran. In contrast with the nocturnal phase preference, fat sand rats did not show a masking response to light pulses during the dark phase or to a dark pulse during the light phase. They did, however, have a significant preference to the light phase under a 3.5?h:3.5?h LD schedule. Currently, we could not identify the underlying mechanisms responsible for the temporal niche switch in this species. However, our results provide us with a valuable tool for further studies of the circadian system of diurnal species, and will hopefully lead us to understanding diurnality, its mechanisms, causes, and consequences.     

Period responses to Zeitgeber signals stabilize circadian clocks during entrainment

Circadian clocks with characteristic period (τ) can be entrained to light/dark (LD) cycles by means of (i) phase shifts which are due to D/L “dawn” and/or L/D “dusk” transitions, (ii) period changes associated with long-term light exposure, or (iii) by combinations of the above possibilities. Based on stability analysis of a model circadian clock it was predicted that nocturnal burrowing mammals would benefit less from period responses than their diurnal counterparts. The model further predicted that maximal stability of circadian clock is reached when the clock slightly changes both its phase and period in response to light stimuli. Analyses of empirical phase response curve (PRC) and period response curve (τRC) of some diurnal and nocturnal mammals revealed that PRCs of both diurnal and nocturnal mammals have similar waveform while τRCs of nocturnal mammals are of smaller amplitude than those of diurnal mammals. The shape of the τRC also changes with age and with increasing strength of light stimuli. During erratic fluctuations in light intensity under different weather conditions, the stability of phase of entrainment of circadian clocks appears to be achieved by an interplay between phase and period responses and the strength of light stimuli.     

Biophysical modeling of the temporal niche: from first principles to the evolution of activity patterns

Most mammals can be characterized as nocturnal or diurnal. However infrequently, species may overcome evolutionary constraints and alter their activity patterns. We modeled the fundamental temporal niche of a diurnal desert rodent, the golden spiny mouse, Acomys russatus. This species can shift into nocturnal activity in the absence of its congener, the common spiny mouse, Acomys cahirinus, suggesting that it was competitively driven into diurnality and that this shift in a small desert rodent may involve physiological costs. Therefore, we compared metabolic costs of diurnal versus nocturnal activity using a biophysical model to evaluate the preferred temporal niche of this species. The model predicted that energy expenditure during foraging is almost always lower during the day except during midday in summer at the less sheltered microhabitat. We also found that a shift in summer to foraging in less sheltered microhabitats in response to predation pressure and food availability involves a significant physiological cost moderated by midday reduction in activity. Thus, adaptation to diurnality may reflect the "ghost of competition past"; climate-driven diurnality is an alternative but less likely hypothesis. While climate is considered to play a major role in the physiology and evolution of mammals, this is the first study to model its potential to affect the evolution of activity patterns of mammals.     

Photic and nonphotic inputs to the diurnal circadian clock

Diurnal animals occupy a different temporal niche from nocturnal animals and are consequently exposed to different amounts of light as well as different dangers. Accordingly, some variation exists in the way that diurnal animals synchronize their internal circadian clock to match the external 24-hour daily cycle. First, though the brain mechanisms underlying photic entrainment are very similar among species with different daily activity patterns, there is evidence that diurnal animals are less sensitive to photic stimuli compared to nocturnal animals. Second, stimuli other than light that synchronize rhythms (i.e. nonphotic stimuli) can also entrain and phase shift daily rhythms. Some of the rules that govern nonphotic entrainment in nocturnal animals as well as the brain mechanisms that control nonphotic influences on rhythms do not appear to apply to diurnal animals, however. Some evidence supports the idea that arousal or activity plays an important role in entraining rhythms in diurnal animals, either during the light (active) or dark (inactive) phases, though no consistent pattern is seen. GABAergic stimulation induces phase shifts during the subjective day in both diurnal and nocturnal animals. In diurnal Arvicanthis niloticus (Nile grass rats), SCN GABA_A receptor activation at this time results in phase delays while in nocturnal animals phase advances are induced. It appears that the effect of GABA at this circadian phase results from the inhibition of period gene expression in both diurnal and nocturnal animals. Nonetheless, the resulting phase shifts are in opposite directions. It is not known what stimuli or behaviours ultimately induce changes in GABA activity in the SCN that result in alterations of circadian phase in diurnal grass rats. Taken together, studies such as these suggest that it may be problematic to apply the principles governing nocturnal nonphotic entrainment and its underlying mechanisms to diurnal species including humans.     

The Relationship between the Golden Spiny Mouse Circadian System and Its Diurnal Activity: An Experimental Field Enclosures and Laboratory Study

Examples of animals that switch activity times between nocturnality and diurnality in nature are relatively infrequent. Furthermore, the mechanism for switching activity time is not clear: does a complete inversion of the circadian system occur in conjunction with activity pattern? Are there switching centers downstream from the internal clock that interpret the clock differently? Or does the switch reflect a masking effect? Answering these key questions may shed light on the mechanisms regulating activity patterns and their evolution. The golden spiny mouse (Acomys russatus) can switch between nocturnal and diurnal activity. This study investigated the relationship between its internal circadian clock and its diurnal activity pattern observed in the field. The goal is to understand the mechanisms underlying species rhythm shifts in order to gain insight into the evolution of activity patterns. All golden spiny mice had opposite activity patterns in the field than those under controlled continuous dark conditions in the laboratory. Activity and body temperature patterns in the field were diurnal, while in the laboratory all individuals immediately showed a free‐running rhythm starting with a nocturnal pattern. No phase transients were found toward the preferred nocturnal activity pattern, as would be expected in the case of true entrainment. Moreover, the fact that the free‐running activity patterns began from the individuals' subjective night suggests that golden spiny mice are nocturnal and that their diurnality in their natural habitat in the field results from a change that is downstream to the internal clock or reflects a masking effect.     

Variability of diurnality in laboratory rodents

The locomotor activity rhythms of domestic mice, laboratory rats, Syrian hamsters, Siberian hamsters, Mongolian gerbils, degus, and Nile grass rats were compared. Running-wheel activity was monitored under a light–dark cycle with 12 h of light and 12 h of darkness per day. Nile grass rats were found to be reliably diurnal, whereas laboratory rats, Siberian hamsters, domestic mice, and Syrian hamsters were reliably nocturnal. Both diurnal and nocturnal subgroups were observed in Mongolian gerbils and degus. A downward gradient of diurnality was observed from Mongolian gerbils classified as diurnal, degus classified as diurnal, gerbils classified as nocturnal, and degus classified as nocturnal. Nocturnal degus remained nocturnal when tested with an infrared motion detector without running wheels. Thus, although the diurnal–nocturnal dichotomy could be applied to some of the species, it was not appropriate for others. The dichotomy may reflect researchers’ needs for systematization more than a natural distinction between species. Through mechanisms as yet poorly understood, the balance between entraining and masking processes seems to generate a gradient of temporal niches that runs from predominantly diurnal species to predominantly nocturnal species with many chronotypes in between, including species that exhibit wide intra-species gradients of temporal niche.     

The relationship between the golden spiny mouse circadian system and its diurnal activity: an experimental field enclosures and laboratory study

Examples of animals that switch activity times between nocturnality and diurnality in nature are relatively infrequent. Furthermore, the mechanism for switching activity time is not clear: does a complete inversion of the circadian system occur in conjunction with activity pattern? Are there switching centers downstream from the internal clock that interpret the clock differently? Or does the switch reflect a masking effect? Answering these key questions may shed light on the mechanisms regulating activity patterns and their evolution. The golden spiny mouse (Acomys russatus) can switch between nocturnal and diurnal activity. This study investigated the relationship between its internal circadian clock and its diurnal activity pattern observed in the field. The goal is to understand the mechanisms underlying species rhythm shifts in order to gain insight into the evolution of activity patterns. All golden spiny mice had opposite activity patterns in the field than those under controlled continuous dark conditions in the laboratory. Activity and body temperature patterns in the field were diurnal, while in the laboratory all individuals immediately showed a free-running rhythm starting with a nocturnal pattern. No phase transients were found toward the preferred nocturnal activity pattern, as would be expected in the case of true entrainment. Moreover, the fact that the free-running activity patterns began from the individuals' subjective night suggests that golden spiny mice are nocturnal and that their diurnality in their natural habitat in the field results from a change that is downstream to the internal clock or reflects a masking effect.     

Nocturnal to Diurnal Switches with Spontaneous Suppression of Wheel-Running Behavior in a Subterranean Rodent

Several rodent species that are diurnal in the field become nocturnal in the lab. It has been suggested that the use of running-wheels in the lab might contribute to this timing switch. This proposition is based on studies that indicate feed-back of vigorous wheel-running on the period and phase of circadian clocks that time daily activity rhythms. Tuco-tucos (Ctenomys aff. knighti) are subterranean rodents that are diurnal in the field but are robustly nocturnal in laboratory, with or without access to running wheels. We assessed their energy metabolism by continuously and simultaneously monitoring rates of oxygen consumption, body temperature, general motor and wheel running activity for several days in the presence and absence of wheels. Surprisingly, some individuals spontaneously suppressed running-wheel activity and switched to diurnality in the respirometry chamber, whereas the remaining animals continued to be nocturnal even after wheel removal. This is the first report of timing switches that occur with spontaneous wheel-running suppression and which are not replicated by removal of the wheel.     

Plasticity of Circadian Activity and Body Temperature Rhythms in Golden Spiny Mice

Most animals can be categorized as nocturnal, diurnal, or crepuscular. However, rhythms can be quite plastic in some species and vary from one individual to another within a species. In the golden spiny mouse (Acomys russatus), a variety of rhythm patterns have been seen, and these patterns can change considerably as animals are transferred from the field into the laboratory. We previously suggested that these animals may have a circadian time‐keeping system that is fundamentally nocturnal and that diurnal patterns seen in their natural habitat reflect mechanisms operating outside of the basic circadian time‐keeping system (i.e., masking). In the current study, we further characterized plasticity evident in the daily rhythms of golden spiny mice by measuring effects of lighting conditions and access to a running wheel on rhythms in general activity (GA) and body temperature (Tb). Before the wheel was introduced, most animals were active mainly during the night, though there was considerable inter‐individual variability and patterns were quite plastic. The introduction of the wheel caused an increase in the level of nighttime activity and Tb in most individuals. The periods of the rhythms in constant darkness (DD) were very similar, and even slightly longer in this study (24.1±0.2 h) than in an earlier one in which animals had not been provided with running wheels. We found no correlation between the distance animals ran in their wheels and the period of their rhythms in DD. Re‐entrainment after phase delays of the LD cycle occurred more rapidly in the presence than absence of the running wheel. The characteristics of the rhythms of golden spiny mice seen in this study may be the product of natural selection favoring plasticity of the circadian system, perhaps reflecting what can happen during an evolutionary transition as animals move from a nocturnal to a diurnal niche.     

Two Steady‐Entrainment Phases and Graded Masking Effects by Light Generate Different Circadian Chronotypes in Octodon degus

Processes involved in the operation of the circadian pacemaker are well characterized; however; little is known about what mechanisms drive the overt diurnal, nocturnal, or crepuscular behavior in a species. In this context, dual‐phasing rodents, such as Octodon degus, emerge as a useful model to decipher these keys. Two main chronotypes, nocturnal and diurnal, have been traditionally described in laboratory‐housed degus based on the percentage of activity displayed by the animals during the scotophase or photophase. However, if one considers also the entrainment phase angle during the first days following a change from LD to DD conditions, a third chronotype (intermediate)—or more properly, a continuous grading of circadian expressions between diurnal and nocturnal chronotype—can be observed. Our experiments suggest the pacemaker of the diurnal animal is entrained to the photophase, and light does not exert a negative masking effect. The pacemaker of the nocturnal degus, on the other hand, is entrained to the scotophase, and light exerts a strong negative masking effect. Finally, the intermediate chronotype is characterized by variable negative masking effect of light overlapping a pacemaker entrained to the photophase. The phase shift inversion from diurnal to nocturnal chronotype is related to the availability of a wheel in the cage, and the effect may be located downstream from the clock. However, body temperature rhythm recordings, less affected by masking effects, point to an involvement of the circadian pacemaker in chronotype differentiation, as transient entrainment cycles, and not an abrupt phase shift, were detected after providing access to the wheel. The diurnality of degus seems to be the result of a variety of mechanisms, which may explain how different processes can lead to similar chronotypes.     

Golden hamsters are nocturnal in captivity but diurnal in nature

Daily activity rhythms are nearly universal among animals and their specific pattern is an adaptation of each species to its ecological niche. Owing to the extremely consistent nocturnal patterns of activity shown by golden hamsters (Mesocricetus auratus) in the laboratory, this species is a prime model for studying the mechanisms controlling circadian rhythms. In contrast to laboratory data, we discovered that female hamsters in the wild were almost exclusively diurnal. These results raise many questions about the ecological variables that shape the activity patterns in golden hamsters and the differences between laboratory and field results.     

Effects of Nocturnal Shiftwork on Mood States of Student Nurses

Daily mood changes were monitored over successive 24-h periods using the Profile of Mood States (POMS) (3) to assess the effect of nocturnal shiftwork on mood. Twenty-three student nurses, age range 19-24 years, were studied throughout their first experience of nocturnal shiftwork. The POMS was administered over four complete solar days during a 12-week period that included an 8-week block of night work. Five POMS dimensions displayed circadian rhythmicity. vigor-activity; fatigue-inertia; confusion-bewilderment; friendliness; and total-mood-disturbance. These five dimensions were sensitive to changes in living patterns, showing phase shifts in their circadian rhythms when subjects alternated between diurnal and nocturnal living patterns. The dimensions were also observed to be sensitive to adjustment to two different nocturnal shiftwork schedules. The subjects who worked “four on, three off showed similar phase shifts to the subjects who worked “eight on, seven off,” suggesting that mood adjustment takes place by the fourth night of a rotation of nights. The “commitment” of the students to the nocturnal living pattern was thought to have a bearing on the adaptation of the students to the nocturnal shifts, as regards mood.     

Lesions of the Intergeniculate Leaflet Lead to a Reorganization in Circadian Regulation and a Reversal in Masking Responses to Photic Stimuli in the Nile Grass Rat

Light influences the daily patterning of behavior by entraining circadian rhythms and through its acute effects on activity levels (masking). Mechanisms of entrainment are quite similar across species, but masking can be very different. Specifically, in diurnal species, light generally increases locomotor activity (positive masking), and in nocturnal ones, it generally suppresses it (negative masking). The intergeniculate leaflet (IGL), a subdivision of the lateral geniculate complex, receives direct retinal input and is reciprocally connected with the primary circadian clock, the suprachiasmatic nucleus (SCN). Here, we evaluated the influence of the IGL on masking and the circadian system in a diurnal rodent, the Nile grass rat (Arvicanthis niloticus), by determining the effects of bilateral IGL lesions on general activity under different lighting conditions. To examine masking responses, light or dark pulses were delivered in the dark or light phase, respectively. Light pulses at Zeitgeber time (ZT) 14 increased activity in control animals but decreased it in animals with IGL lesions. Dark pulses had no effect on controls, but significantly increased activity in lesioned animals at ZT0. Lesions also significantly increased activity, primarily during the dark phase of a 12:12 light/dark cycle, and during the subjective night when animals were kept in constant conditions. Taken together, our results suggest that the IGL plays a vital role in the maintenance of both the species-typical masking responses to light, and the circadian contribution to diurnality in grass rats.     

Out of the dark: 350 million years of conservatism and evolution in diel activity patterns in vertebrates

Many animals are active only during a particular time (e.g., day vs. night), a partitioning that may have important consequences for species coexistence. An open question is the extent to which this diel activity niche is evolutionarily conserved or labile. Here, we analyze diel activity data across a phylogeny of 1914 tetrapod species. We find strong phylogenetic signal, showing that closely related species tend to share similar activity patterns. Ancestral reconstructions show that nocturnality was the most likely ancestral diel activity pattern for tetrapods and many major clades within it (e.g., amphibians, mammals). Remarkably, nocturnal activity appears to have been maintained continuously in some lineages for ～350 million years. Thus, we show that traits involved in local‐scale resource partitioning can be conserved over strikingly deep evolutionary time scales. We also demonstrate a potentially important (but often overlooked) metric of niche conservatism. Finally, we show that diurnal lineages appear to have faster speciation and diversification rates than nocturnal lineages, which may explain why there are presently more diurnal tetrapod species even though diurnality appears to have evolved more recently. Overall, our results may have implications for studies of community ecology, species richness, and the evolution of diet and communication systems.     

Functional and anatomical variations in retinorecipient brain areas in Arvicanthis niloticus and Rattus norvegicus: implications for the circadian and masking systems

ABSTRACT

Daily rhythms in light exposure influence the expression of behavior by entraining circadian rhythms and through its acute effects on behavior (i.e., masking). Importantly, these effects of light are dependent on the temporal niche of the organism; for diurnal organisms, light increases activity, whereas for nocturnal organisms, the opposite is true. Here we examined the functional and morphological differences between diurnal and nocturnal rodents in retinorecipient brain regions using Nile grass rats (Arvicanthis niloticus) and Sprague-Dawley (SD) rats (Rattus norvegicus), respectively. We established the presence of circadian rhythmicity in cFOS activation in retinorecipient brain regions in nocturnal and diurnal rodents housed in constant dark conditions to highlight different patterns between the temporal niches. We then assessed masking effects by comparing cFOS activation in constant darkness (DD) to that in a 12:12 light/dark (LD) cycle, confirming light responsiveness of these regions during times when masking occurs in nature. The intergeniculate leaflet (IGL) and olivary pretectal nucleus (OPN) exhibited significant variation among time points in DD of both species, but their expression profiles were not identical, as SD rats had very low expression levels for most timepoints. Light presentation in LD conditions induced clear rhythms in the IGL of SD rats but eliminated them in grass rats. Additionally, grass rats were the only species to demonstrate daily rhythms in LD for the habenula and showed a strong response to light in the superior colliculus. Structurally, we also analyzed the volumes of the visual brain regions using anatomical MRI, and we observed a significant increase in the relative size of several visual regions within diurnal grass rats, including the lateral geniculate nucleus, superior colliculus, and optic tract. Altogether, our results suggest that diurnal grass rats devote greater proportions of brain volume to visual regions than nocturnal rodents, and cFOS activation in these brain regions is dependent on temporal niche and lighting conditions.     

Acute Behavioral Responses to Light and Darkness in Nocturnal Mus musculus and Diurnal Arvicanthis niloticus

The term masking refers to immediate responses to stimuli that override the influence of the circadian timekeeping system on behavior and physiology. Masking by light and darkness plays an important role in shaping an organism's daily pattern of activity. Nocturnal animals generally become more active in response to darkness (positive masking) and less active in response to light (negative masking), and diurnal animals generally have opposite patterns of response. These responses can vary as a function of light intensity as well as time of day. Few studies have directly compared masking in diurnal and nocturnal species, and none have compared rhythms in masking behavior of diurnal and nocturnal species. Here, we assessed masking in nocturnal mice (Mus musculus) and diurnal grass rats (Arvicanthis niloticus). In the first experiment, animals were housed in a 12:12 light-dark (LD) cycle, with dark or light pulses presented at 6 Zeitgeber times (ZTs; with ZT0 = lights on). Light pulses during the dark phase produced negative masking in nocturnal mice but only at ZT14, whereas light pulses resulted in positive masking in diurnal grass rats across the dark phase. In both species, dark pulses had no effect on behavior. In the 2nd experiment, animals were kept in constant darkness or constant light and were presented with light or dark pulses, respectively, at 6 circadian times (CTs). CT0 corresponded to ZT0 of the preceding LD cycle. Rhythms in masking responses to light differed between species; responses were evident at all CTs in grass rats but only at CT14 in mice. Responses to darkness were observed only in mice, in which there was a significant increase in activity at CT 22. In the 3rd experiment, animals were kept on a 3.5:3.5-h LD cycle. Surprisingly, masking was evident only in grass rats. In mice, levels of activity during the light and dark phases of the 7-h cycle did not differ, even though the same animals had responded to discrete photic stimuli in the first 2 experiments. The results of the 3 experiments are discussed in terms of their methodological implications and for the insight they offer into the mechanisms and evolution of diurnality.     

A re-evaluation of the role of vision in the activity and communication of nocturnal primates

This paper examines the importance of vision in the lives of nocturnal primates in comparison to diurnal and cathemeral species. Vision is the major sense in all primates and there is evidence that the eyesight of nocturnal species is more acute and variable than has previously been recognized. Case studies of the behaviour of a galago and a loris in open woodland habitats in relation to ambient light show that Galago moholi males are more likely to travel between clumps of vegetation along the ground when the moon is up, and during periods of twilight, whereas they retreat to more continuous vegetation and travel less when the moon sets. This is interpreted as a strategy for avoiding predators that hunt on the ground when it is dark. The travel distances of Loris lydekkerianus are not affected by moonlight but this species reduces its choice of food items from more mobile prey to mainly ants when the moon sets, indicating the importance of light when searching for high-energy supplements to its staple diet. Evidence is presented for the first time to indicate key aspects of nocturnal vision that would benefit from further research. It is suggested that the light and dark facial markings of many species convey information about species and individual identity when animals approach each other at night. Differences in the colour of the reflective eye-shine, and behavioural responses displayed when exposed to white torchlight, point to different kinds of nocturnal vision that are suited to each niche, including the possibility of some degree of colour discrimination. The ability of even specialist nocturnal species to see well in broad daylight demonstrates an inherent flexibility that would enable movement into diurnal niches. The major differences in the sensitivity and perceptual anatomy of diurnal lemurs compared to diurnal anthropoids, and the emergence of cathemerality in lemurs, is interpreted as a reflection of evolution from different ancestral stocks in very different ecosystems, and not a recent shift towards diurnality due to human disturbance.     

Diel behavior in moths and butterflies: a synthesis of data illuminates the evolution of temporal activity

Lepidoptera (butterflies and moths) are one of the most taxonomically diverse insect orders with nearly 160,000 described species. They have been studied extensively for centuries and are found on nearly all continents and in many environments. It is often assumed that adult butterflies are strictly diurnal and adult moths are strictly nocturnal, but there are many exceptions. Despite the broad interest in butterflies and moths, a comprehensive review of diel (day-night) activity has not been conducted. Here, we synthesize existing data on diel activity in Lepidoptera, trace its evolutionary history on a phylogeny, and show where gaps lie in our knowledge. Diurnality was likely the ancestral condition in Lepidoptera, the ancestral heteroneuran was likely nocturnal, and more than 40 transitions to diurnality subsequently occurred. Using species diversity estimates across the order, we predict that roughly 75-85% of Lepidoptera are nocturnal. We also define the three frequently used terms for activity in animals (diurnal, nocturnal, crepuscular), and show that literature on the activity of micro-moths is significantly lacking. Ecological factors leading to nocturnality/diurnality is a compelling area of research and should be the focus of future studies.