Determination of the stoichiometry and strength of binding of xanthophylls to the photosystem II light harvesting complexes

Xanthophylls have a crucial role in the structure and function of the light harvesting complexes of photosystem II (LHCII) in plants. The binding of xanthophylls to LHCII has been investigated, particularly with respect to the xanthophyll cycle carotenoids violaxanthin and zeaxanthin. It was found that most of the violaxanthin pool was loosely bound to the major complex and could be removed by mild detergent treatment. Gentle solubilization of photosystem II particles and thylakoids allowed the isolation of complexes, including a newly described oligomeric preparation, enriched in trimers, that retained all of the in vivo violaxanthin pool. It was estimated that each LHCII monomer can bind at least one violaxanthin. The extent to which different pigments can be removed from LHCII indicated that the relative strength of binding was chlorophyll b > neoxanthin > chlorophyll a > lutein > zeaxanthin > violaxanthin. The xanthophyll binding sites are of two types: internal sites binding lutein and peripheral sites binding neoxanthin and violaxanthin. In CP29, a minor LHCII, both a lutein site and the neoxanthin site can be occupied by violaxanthin. Upon activation of the violaxanthin de-epoxidase, the highest de-epoxidation state was found for the main LHCII component and the lowest for CP29, suggesting that only violaxanthin loosely bound to LHCII is available for de-epoxidation.     

The binding of Xanthophylls to the bulk light-harvesting complex of photosystem II of higher plants. A specific requirement for carotenoids with a 3-hydroxy-beta-end group

The pigment composition of the light-harvesting complexes (LHCs) of higher plants is highly conserved. The bulk complex (LHCIIb) binds three xanthophyll molecules in combination with chlorophyll (Chl) a and b. The structural requirements for binding xanthophylls to LHCIIb have been examined using an in vitro reconstitution procedure. Reassembly of the monomeric recombinant LHCIIb was performed using a wide range of native and nonnative xanthophylls, and a specific requirement for the presence of a hydroxy group at C-3 on a single beta-end group was identified. The presence of additional substituents (e.g. at C-4) did not interfere with xanthophyll binding, but they could not, on their own, support reassembly. cis isomers of zeaxanthin, violaxanthin, and lutein were not bound, whereas all-trans-neoxanthin and different chiral forms of lutein and zeaxanthin were incorporated into the complex. The C-3 and C-3' diols lactucaxanthin (a carotenoid native to many plant LHCs) and eschscholtzxanthin (a retro-carotenoid) both behaved very differently from lutein and zeaxanthin in that they would not support complex reassembly when used alone. Lactucaxanthin could, however, be bound when lutein was also present, and it showed a high affinity for xanthophyll binding site N1. In the presence of lutein, lactucaxanthin was readily bound to at least one lutein-binding site, suggesting that the ability to bind to the complex and initiate protein folding may be dependent on different structural features of the carotenoid molecule. The importance of carotenoid end group structure and ring-to-chain conformation around the C-6-C-7 torsion angle of the carotenoid molecule in binding and complex reassembly is discussed.     

Effects of chlorophyll a, chlorophyll b, and xanthophylls on the in vitro assembly kinetics of the major light-harvesting chlorophyll a/b complex, LHCIIb

The major light-harvesting chlorophyll a/b complex (LHCIIb) of photosystem II in higher plants can be reconstituted with pigments in lipid-detergent micelles. The pigment-protein complexes formed are functional in that they perform efficient internal energy transfer from chlorophyll b to chlorophyll a. LHCIIb formation in vitro, can be monitored by the appearance of energy transfer from chlorophyll b to chlorophyll a in time-resolved fluorescence measurements. LHCIIb is found to form in two apparent kinetic steps with time constants of about 30 and 200 seconds. Here we report on the dependence of the LHCIIb formation kinetics on the composition of the pigment mixture used in the reconstitution. Both kinetic steps slow down when the concentration of either chlorophylls or carotenoids is reduced. This suggests that the slower 200 seconds formation of functional LHCIIb still includes binding of both chlorophylls and carotenoids. LHCIIb formation is accelerated when the chlorophylls in the reconstitution mixture consist predominantly of chlorophyll a although the complexes formed are thermally less stable than those reconstituted with a chlorophyll a:b ratio < or = 1. This indicates that although chlorophyll a binding is more dominant in the observed rate of LHCIIb formation, the occupation of (some) chlorophyll binding sites with chlorophyll b is essential for complex stability. The accelerating effect of various carotenoids (lutein, zeaxanthin, violaxanthin, neoxanthin) on LHCIIb formation correlates with their affinity to two lutein-specific binding sites. We conclude that the occupation of these two carotenoid binding sites but not of the third (neoxanthin-specific) binding site is an essential step in the assembly of LHCIIb in vitro.     

The current concepts of functional role of carotenoids in the eukaryotic chloroplasts

Current state of knowledge of functional role of carotenoids in algal and higher plant chloroplasts is reviewed. Basic functions of carotenoids are shown to be light-protective, light-absorbing, and structural, as well as participating in photochemical processes of photosystems I and II. Such xanthophylls as neoxanthin, fucoxanthin, peridinin and alloxanthin, which have allenic or acetylenic bond, mostly function as light-absorbers. They transmit absorbed energy to chlorophyll b. Other xanthophylls occupying certain strictly specified loci in light-absorbing chlorophyll-a/b-protein complexes of photosystems have either structural function (lutein) or light-protective function (zeaxanthin, antheraxanthin, violaxanthin). Carotenoids of xanthophyll cycles preserve chlorophylls and lipids of photosynthetic membranes from photodestruction at overlighting in the presence of oxygen. In eukaryotic chloroplasts, three types of xanthophyll cycles were found: violaxanthin, lutein-5,6-epoxide, and diadinoxanthin. The similarities and dissimilarities between epoxidation and de-epoxidation reactions of these cycles are discussed in detail in the present work. The pattern of occurrence of xanthophyll cycles among higher plants and freshwater and marine algae is outlined.     

Carotenoid-binding sites of the major light-harvesting complex II of higher plants.

Recombinant light-harvesting complex II (LHCII) proteins with modified carotenoid composition have been obtained by in vitro reconstitution of the Lhcb1 protein overexpressed in bacteria. The monomeric protein possesses three xanthophyll-binding sites. The L1 and L2 sites, localized by electron crystallography in the helix A/helix B cross, have the highest affinity for lutein, but also bind violaxanthin and zeaxanthin with lower affinity. The latter xanthophyll causes disruption of excitation energy transfer. The occupancy of at least one of these sites, probably L1, is essential for protein folding. Neoxanthin is bound to a distinct site (N1) that is highly selective for this species and whose occupancy is not essential for protein folding. Whereas xanthophylls in the L1 and L2 sites interact mainly with chlorophyll a, neoxanthin shows strong interaction with chlorophyll b, inducing the hyperchromic effect of the 652 nm absorption band. This observation explains the recent results of energy transfer from carotenoids to chlorophyll b obtained by femtosecond absorption spectroscopy. Whereas xanthophylls in the L1 and L2 sites are active in photoprotection through chlorophyll-triplet quenching, neoxanthin seems to act mainly in (1)O(2)(*) scavenging.     

Occurrence of neoxanthin and lutein epoxide cycle in parasitic Cuscuta species

In the present study, xanthophyll composition of eight parasitic Cuscuta species under different light conditions was investigated. Neoxanthin was not detected in four of the eight species examined, while in others it occurred at the level of several percent of total xanthophylls. In C. gronovii and C. lupuliformis it was additionally found that the neoxanthin content was considerably stimulated by strong light. In dark-adapted plants, lutein epoxide level amounted to 10-22% of total xanthophylls in only three species, the highest being for C. lupuliformis, while in others it was below 3%, indicating that the lutein epoxide cycle is limited to only certain Cuscuta species. The obtained data also indicate that the presence of the lutein epoxide cycle and of neoxanthin is independent and variable among the Cuscuta species. The xanthophyll cycle carotenoids violaxanthin, antheraxanthin and zeaxanthin were identified in all the examined species and occurred at the level found in other higher plants. The xanthophyll and lutein epoxide cycle pigments showed typical response to high light stress. The obtained results also suggest that the ability of higher plants to synthesize lutein epoxide probably does not depend on the substrate specificity of zeaxanthin epoxidase but on the availability of lutein for the enzyme.     

Singlet and triplet state transitions of carotenoids in the antenna complexes of higher-plant photosystem I

In this work, the spectroscopic characteristics of carotenoids associated with the antenna complexes of Photosystem I have been studied. Pigment composition, absorption spectra, and laser-induced triplet-minus-singlet (T-S) spectra were determined for native LHCI from the wild type (WT) and lut2 mutant from Arabidopsis thaliana as well as for reconstituted individual Lhca WT and mutated complexes. All WT complexes bind lutein and violaxanthin, while beta-carotene was found to be associated only with the native LHCI preparation and recombinant Lhca3. In the native complexes, the main lutein absorption bands are located at 492 and 510 nm. It is shown that violaxanthin is able to occupy all lutein binding sites, but its absorption is blue-shifted to 487 and 501 nm. The "red" lutein absorbing at 510 nm was found to be associated with Lhca3 and Lhca4 which also show a second carotenoid, peaking around 490 nm. Both these xanthophylls are involved in triplet quenching and show two T-S maxima: one at 507 nm (corresponding to the 490 nm singlet absorption) and the second at 525 nm (with absorption at 510 nm). The "blue"-absorbing xanthophyll is located in site L1 and can receive triplets from chlorophylls (Chl) 1012, 1011, and possibly 1013. The red-shifted spectral component is assigned to a lutein molecule located in the L2 site. A 510 nm lutein was also observed in the trimers of LHCII but was absent in the monomers. In the case of Lhca, the 510 nm band is present in both the monomeric and dimeric complexes. We suggest that the large red shift observed for this xanthophyll is due to interaction with the neighbor Chl 1015. In the native T-S spectrum, the contribution of carotenoids associated with Lhca2 is visible while the one of Lhca1 is not. This suggests that in the Lhca2-Lhca3 heterodimeric complex energy equilibration is not complete at least on a fast time scale.     

Different roles of alpha- and beta-branch xanthophylls in photosystem assembly and photoprotection

Xanthophylls (oxygenated carotenoids) are essential components of the plant photosynthetic apparatus, where they act in photosystem assembly, light harvesting, and photoprotection. Nevertheless, the specific function of individual xanthophyll species awaits complete elucidation. In this work, we analyze the photosynthetic phenotypes of two newly isolated Arabidopsis mutants in carotenoid biosynthesis containing exclusively alpha-branch (chy1chy2lut5) or beta-branch (chy1chy2lut2) xanthophylls. Both mutants show complete lack of qE, the rapidly reversible component of nonphotochemical quenching, and high levels of photoinhibition and lipid peroxidation under photooxidative stress. Both mutants are much more photosensitive than npq1lut2, which contains high levels of viola- and neoxanthin and a higher stoichiometry of light-harvesting proteins with respect to photosystem II core complexes, suggesting that the content in light-harvesting complexes plays an important role in photoprotection. In addition, chy1chy2lut5, which has lutein as the only xanthophyll, shows unprecedented photosensitivity even in low light conditions, reduced electron transport rate, enhanced photobleaching of isolated LHCII complexes, and a selective loss of CP26 with respect to chy1chy2lut2, highlighting a specific role of beta-branch xanthophylls in photoprotection and in qE mechanism. The stronger photosystem II photoinhibition of both mutants correlates with the higher rate of singlet oxygen production from thylakoids and isolated light-harvesting complexes, whereas carotenoid composition of photosystem II core complex was not influential. In depth analysis of the mutant phenotypes suggests that alpha-branch (lutein) and beta-branch (zeaxanthin, violaxanthin, and neoxanthin) xanthophylls have distinct and complementary roles in antenna protein assembly and in the mechanisms of photoprotection.     

Stark effect measurements on monomers and trimers of reconstituted light-harvesting complex II of plants

The electric-field induced absorption changes (Stark effect) of reconstituted light-harvesting complex II (LHCII) in different oligomerisation states-monomers and trimers-with different xanthophyll content have been probed at 77 K. The Stark spectra of the reconstituted control samples, containing the xanthophylls lutein and neoxanthin, are very similar to previously reported spectra of native LHCII. Reconstituted LHCII, containing lutein but no neoxanthin, shows a similar electrooptical response in the Chl a region, but the Stark signal of Chl b around 650 nm amounts to at most approximately 25% of that of the control samples. We conclude that neoxanthin strongly modifies the electronic states of the nearby Chl b molecules causing a large electrooptical response at 650 nm stemming from one or more Chls b in the control samples. Ambiguities about the assignment of several bands in the Soret region [Biochim. Biophys. Acta 1605 (2003) 83] are resolved and the striking difference in electric field response between the two lutein molecules is confirmed. The Stark effect in the carotenoid spectral region in both control and neoxanthin-deficient samples is almost identical, showing that the neoxanthin Stark signal is small and much less intense than the lutein Stark signal.     

Mechanistic aspects of the xanthophyll dynamics in higher plant thylakoids

Plant thylakoids have a highly conserved xanthophyll composition, consisting of β-carotene, lutein, neoxanthin and a pool of violaxanthin that can be converted to antheraxanthin and zeaxanthin in excess light conditions. Recent work has shown that xanthophylls undergo dynamic changes, not only in their composition but also in their distribution among Lhc proteins. Xanthophylls are released from specific binding site in the major trimeric LHCII complex of photosystem II and are subsequently bound to different sites into monomeric Lhcb proteins and dimeric Lhca proteins. In this work we review available evidence from in vivo and in vitro studies on the structural determinants that control xanthophyll exchange in Lhc proteins. We conclude that the xanthophyll exchange rate is determined by the structure of individual Lhc gene products and it is specifically controlled by the lumenal pH independently from the activation state of the violaxanthin de-epoxidase enzyme. The xanthophyll exchange induces important modifications in the organization of the antenna system of Photosystem II and, possibly of Photosystem I. Major changes consist into a modulation of the light harvesting efficiency and an increase of the protection from lipid peroxidation. The xanthophyll cycle thus appears to be a signal transduction system for co-ordinated regulation of the photoprotection mechanisms under persistent stress from excess light.     

Photochemical behavior of xanthophylls in the recombinant photosystem II antenna complex, CP26

The steady state absorption and fluorescence spectroscopic properties of the xanthophylls, violaxanthin, zeaxanthin, and lutein, and the efficiencies of singlet energy transfer from the individual xanthophylls to chlorophyll have been investigated in recombinant CP26 protein overexpressed in Escherichia coli and then refolded in vitro with purified pigments. Also, the effect of the different xanthophylls on the extents of static and dynamic quenching of chlorophyll fluorescence has been investigated. Absorption, fluorescence, and fluorescence excitation demonstrate that the efficiency of light harvesting from the xanthophylls to chlorophyll a is relatively high and insensitive to the particular xanthophyll that is present. A small effect of the different xanthophylls is observed on the extent of quenching of Chl fluorescence. The data provide the precise wavelengths of the absorption and fluorescence features of the bound pigments in the highly congested spectral profiles from these light-harvesting complexes. This information is important in assessing the mechanisms by which higher plants dissipate excess energy in light-harvesting proteins.     

Short- and long-term operation of the lutein-epoxide cycle in light-harvesting antenna complexes

The lutein-5,6-epoxide (Lx) cycle operates in some plants between lutein (L) and its monoepoxide, Lx. Whereas recent studies have established the photoprotective roles of the analogous violaxanthin cycle, physiological functions of the Lx cycle are still unknown. In this article, we investigated the operation of the Lx cycle in light-harvesting antenna complexes (Lhcs) of Inga sapindoides Willd, a tropical tree legume accumulating substantial Lx in shade leaves, to identify the xanthophyll-binding sites involved in short- and long-term responses of the Lx cycle and to analyze the effects on light-harvesting efficiency. In shade leaves, Lx was converted into L upon light exposure, which then replaced Lx in the peripheral V1 site in trimeric Lhcs and the internal L2 site in both monomeric and trimeric Lhcs, leading to xanthophyll composition resembling sun-type Lhcs. Similar to the violaxanthin cycle, the Lx cycle was operating in both photosystems, yet the light-induced Lx --> L conversion was not reversible overnight. Interestingly, the experiments using recombinant Lhcb5 reconstituted with different Lx and/or L levels showed that reconstitution with Lx results in a significantly higher fluorescence yield due to higher energy transfer efficiencies among chlorophyll (Chl) a molecules, as well as from xanthophylls to Chl a. Furthermore, the spectroscopic analyses of photosystem I-LHCI from I. sapindoides revealed prominent red-most Chl forms, having the lowest energy level thus far reported for higher plants, along with reduced energy transfer efficiency from antenna pigments to Chl a. These results are discussed in the context of photoacclimation and shade adaptation.     

Molecular configuration of xanthophyll cycle carotenoids in photosystem II antenna complexes

The molecular configuration of the xanthophyll cycle carotenoids, violaxanthin and zeaxanthin, was studied in various isolated photosystem II antenna components in comparison to intact photosystem II membranes using resonance Raman combined with low-temperature absorption spectroscopy. The molecular configurations of zeaxanthin and violaxanthin in thylakoids and isolated photosystem II membranes were found to be the same within an isolated oligomeric LHCII antenna, confirming our recent conclusion that these molecules are not freely located in photosynthetic membranes (Ruban, A. V., Pascal, A. A., Robert, B., and Horton, P. (2001) J. Biol. Chem. 276, 24862-24870). In contrast, xanthophyll cycle carotenoids bound to LHCII trimers had largely lost their in vivo configuration, suggesting their partial dissociation from the binding locus. Violaxanthin and zeaxanthin associated with the minor antenna complexes, CP26 and CP29, were also found to be in a relaxed configuration, similar to that of free pigment. The origin of the characteristic C-H vibrational bands of violaxanthin and zeaxanthin in vivo is discussed by comparison with those of neoxanthin and lutein in oligomeric and trimeric LHCII respectively.     

PIGMENT COMPOSITION OF THE SCALY GREEN FLAGELLATE MESOSTIGMA VIRIDE (MICROMONADOPHYCEAE) IS SIMILAR TO THAT OF THE SIPHONOUS GREEN ALGA BRYOPIS PLUMOSA (ULVOPHYCEAE)1

Pigments were isolated from Mesostigma viride Lauterborn by reversed-phase high-performance liquid chromatography and compared to standards from Chlamydomonas reinhardtii Dang. and Bryopsis plumose (Huds.) Ag. M. viride possesses chlorophylls a and b, α and β-carotenes, and the xanthophylls siphonaxanthis, siphonein, neoxanthin, violaxanthin and echinenone. In addition, three unidentified xanthophylla were detected. Neither lutein nor zeaxanthin were detected. The pigment composition of M. viride was similar to that of B. plumosa which had chlorophylls a and b, ?- and α-carotenes, siphonaxanthin, siphonein, neoxanthin, violaxanthin, and two of the unidentified xanthophylls found in M. viride. The similarities in the pigments of Mesostigma and Bryopsis and other characters suggest that Mesostigma may be related to a flagellate ancestor of the Ulvophyceae.     

Leaf Xanthophyll content and composition in sun and shade determined by HPLC

As a part of our investigations to test the hypothesis that zeaxanthin formed by reversible de-epoxidation of violaxanthin serves to dissipate any excessive and potentially harmful excitation energy we determined the influence of light climate on the size of the xanthophyll cycle pool (violaxanthin + antheraxanthin + zeaxanthin) in leaves of a number of species of higher plants. The maximum amount of zeaxanthin that can be formed by de-epoxidation of violaxanthin and antheraxanthin is determined by the pool size of the xanthophyll cycle. To quantitate the individual leaf carotenoids a rapid, sensitive and accurate HPLC method was developed using a non-endcapped Zorbax ODS column, giving baseline separation of lutein and zeaxanthin as well as of other carotenoids and Chl a and b.The size of the xanthophyll cycle pool, both on a basis of light-intercepting leaf area and of light-harvesting chlorophyll, was ca. four times greater in sun-grown leaves of a group of ten sun tolerant species than in shade-grown leaves in a group of nine shade tolerant species. In contrast there were no marked or consistent differences between the two groups in the content of the other major leaf xanthophylls, lutein and neoxanthin. Also, in each of four species examined the xanthophyll pool size increased with an increase in the amount of light available during leaf development whereas there was little change in the content of the other xanthophylls. However, the -carotene/-carotene ratio decreased and little or no -carotene was detected in sun-grown leaves. Among shade-grown leaves the -carotene/-carotene ratio was considerably higher in species deemed to be umbrophilic than in species deemed to be heliophilic.The percentage of the xanthophyll cycle pool present as violaxanthin (di-epoxy-zeaxanthin) at solar noon was 96–100% for shade-grown plants and 4–53% for sun-grown plants with zeaxanthin accounting for most of the balance. The percentage of zeaxanthin in leaves exposed to midday solar radiation was higher in those with low than in those with high photosynthetic capacity.The results are consistent with the hypothesis that the xanthophyll cycle is involved in the regulation of energy dissipation in the pigment bed, thereby preventing a buildup of excessive excitation energy at the reaction centers.Abbreviations A antheraxanthin - C -carotene - C -carotene - EPS epoxidation state (V+0.5A)/(V+A+Z) - L lutein - N neoxanthin - PFD photon flux density - V violaxanthin - Z zeaxanthin C.I.W.-D.P.B. Publiation No. 1035     

Dynamics of chromophore binding to Lhc proteins in vivo and in vitro during operation of the xanthophyll cycle

Three plant xanthophylls are components of the xanthophyll cycle in which, upon exposure of leaves to high light, the enzyme violaxanthin de-epoxidase (VDE) transforms violaxanthin into zeaxanthin via the intermediate antheraxanthin. Previous work () showed that xanthophylls are bound to Lhc proteins and that substitution of violaxanthin with zeaxanthin induces conformational changes and fluorescence quenching by thermal dissipation. We have analyzed the efficiency of different Lhc proteins to exchange violaxanthin with zeaxanthin both in vivo and in vitro. Light stress of Zea mays leaves activates VDE, and the newly formed zeaxanthin is found primarily in CP26 and CP24, whereas other Lhc proteins show a lower exchange capacity. The de-epoxidation system has been reconstituted in vitro by using recombinant Lhc proteins, recombinant VDE, and monogalactosyl diacylglycerol (MGDG) to determine the intrinsic capacity for violaxanthin-to-zeaxanthin exchange of individual Lhc gene products. Again, CP26 was the most efficient in xanthophyll exchange. Biochemical and spectroscopic analysis of individual Lhc proteins after de-epoxidation in vitro showed that xanthophyll exchange occurs at the L2-binding site. Xanthophyll exchange depends on low pH, implying that access to the binding site is controlled by a conformational change via lumenal pH. These findings suggest that the xanthophyll cycle participates in a signal transduction system acting in the modulation of light harvesting versus thermal dissipation in the antenna system of higher plants.     

Chromophore organization in the higher-plant photosystem II antenna protein CP26

The chlorophyll a/b-xanthophyll-protein CP26 complex belongs to the Lhc protein family. It binds nine chlorophylls and two xanthophylls per 26.6 kDa polypeptide. Determination of the characteristics of each binding site is needed for the understanding of functional organization of individual proteins belonging to the photosystem II supramolecular complex. The biochemical and spectroscopic features of native CP26 are presented here together with identification of pigment binding and energy transitions in different sites. The analysis has been performed via a new approach using recombinant CP26 complexes in which the chromophore content has been experimentally modified. Data were interpreted on the basis of homology with CP29 and LHCII complexes, for which detailed knowledge is available from mutation analysis. We propose that one additional Chl b is present in CP26 as compared to CP29 and that it is located in site B2. We also found that in CP26 three chlorophyll binding sites are selective for Chl a, one of them being essential for the folding of the pigment-protein complex. Two xanthophyll binding sites were identified, one of which (L1) is essential for protein folding and specifically binds lutein. The second site (L2) has lower selectivity and can bind any of the xanthophyll species present in thylakoids.     

Carotenoid composition in Zea mays developed at sub-optimal temperature and different light intensities

The content and composition of pigments were examined in the third leaf of Zea mays L. plants grown under controlled environment at near-optimal temperature (24°C) or sub-optimal temperature (14°C) at a light intensity of either 200 or 600 μmol m^?2 s^?1. Compared to leaves grown at 24°C, leaves grown at 14°C showed a large reduction in the chlorophyll (Chl) content, a marked decrease in the Chl a/b ratio, and a large increase in the ratio of total carotenoids/Chl a+b. Leaves grown at 14°C showed a much lower content of β-carotene than leaves grown at 24°C, while the content of the carotenoids of the xanthophyll cycle (violaxanthin [V] + antheraxanthin [A] + zeaxanthin [Z]) was markedly higher in the former leaves as compared to the latter leaves; neoxanthin and lutein were affected by the growth temperature to a much lesser extent. The xanthophylls/β-carotene ratio was about three times higher in leaves grown at 14°C as compared to leaves grown at 24°C. On a chlorophyll basis, the two types of leaves hardly differed in their level of β-carotene, while the levels of the xanthophylls (including lutein and neoxanthin) were higher in 14°C-grown leaves as compared to 24°C-grown leaves. In leaves grown at 14°C, 40 and 56% of the V+A+Z pool was in the form of zeaxanthin at low light intensity and high light intensity, respectively. Only trace amounts of zeaxanthin, if any, were present in leaves grown at 24°C. The changes in the pigment composition induced by growth at sub-optimal temperature were more pronounced at a light intensity of 600 as compared to 200 μmol m^?2 s^?1. In the given range, the light intensity slightly affected the composition of pigments in leaves grown at 24°C. The physiological significance of the modifications to the pigment composition induced by growth at sub-optimal temperature is discussed.     

De-epoxidation of violaxanthin after reconstitution into different carotenoid binding sites of light-harvesting complex II

In higher plants, the de-epoxidation of violaxanthin (Vx) to antheraxanthin and zeaxanthin is required for the pH-dependent dissipation of excess light energy as heat and by that process plays an important role in the protection against photo-oxidative damage. The de-epoxidation reaction was investigated in an in vitro system using reconstituted light-harvesting complex II (LHCII) and a thylakoid raw extract enriched in the enzyme Vx de-epoxidase. Reconstitution of LHCII with varying carotenoids was performed to replace lutein and/or neoxanthin, which are bound to the native complex, by Vx. Recombinant LHCII containing either 2 lutein and 1 Vx or 1.6 Vx and 1.1 neoxanthin or 2.8 Vx per monomer were studied. Vx de-epoxidation was inducible for all complexes after the addition of Vx de-epoxidase but to different extents and with different kinetics in each complex. Analysis of the kinetics indicated that the three possible Vx binding sites have at least two, and perhaps three, specific rate constants for de-epoxidation. In particular, Vx bound to one of the two lutein binding sites of the native complex, most likely L1, was not at all or only at a slow rate convertible to Zx. In reisolated LHCII, newly formed Zx almost stoichiometrically replaced the transformed Vx, indicating that LHCII and Vx de-epoxidase stayed in close contact during the de-epoxidation reactions and that no release of carotenoids occurred.     

Analysis of the pigment stoichiometry of pigment-protein complexes from barley (Hordeum vulgare). The xanthophyll cycle intermediates occur mainly in the light-harvesting complexes of photosystem I and photosystem II.

The carotenoid zeaxanthin has been implicated in a nonradiative dissipation of excess excitation energy. To determine its site of action, we have examined the location of zeaxanthin within the thylakoid membrane components. Five pigment-protein complexes were isolated with little loss of pigments: photosystem I (PSI); core complex (CC) I, the core of PSI; CC II, the core of photosystem II (PSII); light-harvesting complex (LHC) IIb, a trimer of the major light-harvesting protein of PSII; and LHC IIa, c, and d, a complex of the monomeric minor light-harvesting proteins of PSII. Zeaxanthin was found predominantly in the LHC complexes. Lesser amounts were present in the CCs possibly because these contained some extraneous LHC polypeptides. The LHC IIb trimer and the monomeric LHC II a, c, and d pigment-proteins from dark-adapted plants each contained, in addition to lutein and neoxanthin, one violaxanthin molecule but little antheraxanthin and no zeaxanthin. Following illumination, each complex had a reduced violaxanthin content, but now more antheraxanthin and zeaxanthin were present. PSI had little or no neoxanthin. The pigment content of LHC I was deduced by subtracting the pigment content of CC I from that of PSI. Our best estimate for the carotenoid content of a LHC IIb trimer from dark-adapted plants is one violaxanthin, two neoxanthins, six luteins, and 0.03 mol of antheraxanthin per mol trimer. The xanthophyll cycle occurs mainly or exclusively within the light-harvesting antennae of both photosystems.