Real time analysis of lipoprotein transfer from LolA to LolB by means of surface plasmon resonance

Lipoproteins of Escherichia coli are sorted to the outer membrane through a pathway composed of five Lol proteins. LolA transports lipoproteins released from the inner membrane by LolCDE to LolB on the outer membrane via the periplasm. Interaction between LolA and LolB was speculated to be strong when LolA binds lipoprotein. However, due to a lack of a sensitive method, the kinetics of this reaction have not been examined in detail. We report here the detection of lipoprotein transfer in real time by means of surface plasmon resonance. The kinetic parameters of lipoprotein transfer were determined with wild-type LolA and a mutant defective in it.

Structured summary

MINT-7259948: mlolB (uniprotkb:P61320) binds (MI:0407) to pal (uniprotkb:P0A912) by surface plasmon resonance (MI:0107)     

Hydrophobic Surface Patches on LolA of Pseudomonas aeruginosa Are Essential for Lipoprotein Binding

Many lipoproteins reside in the outer membrane (OM) of Gram-negative bacteria, and their biogenesis is dependent on the Lol (localization of lipoproteins) system. The periplasmic chaperone LolA accepts OM-destined lipoproteins that are released from the inner membrane by the LolCDE complex and transfers them to the OM receptor LolB. The exact nature of the LolA-lipoprotein complex is still unknown. The crystal structure of Escherichia coli LolA features an open β-barrel covered by α helices that together constitute a hydrophobic cavity, which would allow the binding of one acyl chain. However, OM lipoproteins contain three acyl chains, and the stoichiometry of the LolA-lipoprotein complex is 1:1. Here we present the crystal structure of Pseudomonas aeruginosa LolA that projects clear hydrophobic surface patches. Since these patches are large enough to accommodate acyl chains, their role in lipoprotein binding was investigated. Several LolA mutant proteins were created, and their functionality was assessed by studying their capacity to release lipoproteins produced in sphaeroplasts. Interruption of the largest hydrophobic patch completely destroyed the lipoprotein-releasing capacity of LolA, while interruption of smaller patches apparently reduced efficiency. Thus, the results show a new lipoprotein transport model that places (some of) the acyl chains on the hydrophobic surface patches.     

Characterization of the LolA-LolB system as the general lipoprotein localization mechanism of Escherichia coli.

The major outer membrane lipoprotein (Lpp) of Escherichia coli requires LolA for its release from the cytoplasmic membrane, and LolB for its localization to the outer membrane. We examined the significance of the LolA-LolB system as to the outer membrane localization of other lipoproteins. All lipoproteins possessing an outer membrane-directed signal at the N-terminal second position were efficiently released from the inner membrane in the presence of LolA. Some lipoproteins were released in the absence of externally added LolA, albeit at a slower rate and to a lesser extent. This LolA-independent release was also strictly dependent on the outer membrane sorting signal. A lipoprotein-LolA complex was formed when the release took place in the presence of LolA, whereas lipoproteins released in the absence of LolA existed as heterogeneous complexes, suggesting that the release and the formation of a complex with LolA are distinct events. The release of LolB, an outer membrane lipoprotein functioning as the receptor for a lipoprotein-LolA complex, occurred with a trace amount of LolA, and therefore was extremely efficient. The LolA-dependent release of lipoproteins was found to be crucial for the specific incorporation of lipoproteins into the outer membrane, whereas lipoproteins released in the absence of LolA were nonspecifically and inefficiently incorporated into the membrane. The outer membrane incorporation of lipoproteins including LolB per se was dependent on LolB in the outer membrane. From these results, we conclude that lipoproteins in E. coli generally utilize the LolA-LolB system for efficient release from the inner membrane and specific localization to the outer membrane.     

Mutant of LolA, a lipoprotein-specific molecular chaperone of Escherichia coli, defective in the transfer of lipoproteins to LolB

The outer membrane-specific lipoproteins of Escherichia coli are released from the inner membrane as a water-soluble complex with LolA and then transferred to the outer membrane receptor, LolB. LolA thus plays a critical role in the sorting and outer membrane localization of lipoproteins. To dissect the LolA function, the highly conserved residues were subjected to random mutagenesis, followed by selection for a growth defect. LolA(R43L), one of mutants thus constructed, possessed Leu in place of Arg at position 43 and caused accumulation of the LolA(R43L)-lipoprotein complex in the periplasm. LolA(R43L) was as active as wild-type LolA as to the release of lipoproteins from spheroplasts. In marked contrast, the transfer of lipoproteins from LolA(R43L) to LolB was completely inhibited, indicating that Arg at position 43 of LolA is involved in the lipoprotein transfer reaction.     

Opening and closing of the hydrophobic cavity of LolA coupled to lipoprotein binding and release

Outer membrane-specific lipoproteins of Escherichia coli are released from the inner membrane through the action of Lol-CDE, which leads to the formation of a complex between the lipoprotein and LolA, a periplasmic chaperone. LolA then transfers lipoproteins to LolB, a receptor in the outer membrane. The structures of LolA and LolB are very similar, having an incomplete beta-barrel covered with an alpha-helical lid forming a hydrophobic cavity inside. The cavity of LolA, but not that of LolB, is closed and thus inaccessible to the bulk solvent. Previous studies suggested that Arg at position 43 of LolA is critical for maintaining this closed structure. We show here, through a crystallographic study, that the cavity of the LolA(R43L) mutant, in which Leu replaces Arg-43, is indeed open to the external milieu. We then found that the binding of a fluorescence probe distinguishes the open/close state of the cavity. Furthermore, it was revealed that the hydrophobic cavity of LolA opens upon the binding of lipoproteins. Such a liganded LolA was found to be inactive in the release of lipoproteins from the inner membrane. On the other hand, the liganded LolA became fully functional when lipoproteins were removed from LolA by detergent treatment or transferred to LolB. Free LolA thus formed was inaccessible to a fluorescence probe. These results, taken together, reveal the LolA cycle, in which the hydrophobic cavity undergoes opening and closing upon the binding and release of lipoproteins, respectively.     

Large-scale preparation of the homogeneous LolA lipoprotein complex and efficient in vitro transfer of lipoproteins to the outer membrane in a LolB-dependent manner

An ATP-binding cassette transporter LolCDE complex of Escherichia coli releases lipoproteins destined to the outer membrane from the inner membrane as a complex with a periplasmic chaperone, LolA. Interaction of the LolA-lipoprotein complex with an outer membrane receptor, LolB, then causes localization of lipoproteins to the outer membrane. As far as examined, formation of the LolA-lipoprotein complex strictly depends on ATP hydrolysis by the LolCDE complex in the presence of LolA. It has been speculated, based on crystallographic and biochemical observations, that LolA undergoes an ATP-dependent conformational change upon lipoprotein binding. Thus, preparation of a large amount of the LolA-lipoprotein complex is difficult. Moreover, lipoproteins bound to LolA are heterogeneous. We report here that the coexpression of LolA and outer membrane-specific lipoprotein Pal from a very efficient plasmid causes the unusual accumulation of the LolA-Pal complex in the periplasm. The complex was purified to homogeneity and shown to be a functional intermediate of the lipoprotein localization pathway. In vitro incorporation of Pal into outer membranes revealed that a single molecule of LolB catalyzes the incorporation of more than 100 molecules of Pal into outer membranes. Moreover, the LolB-dependent incorporation of Pal was not affected by excess-free LolA, indicating that LolB specifically interacts with liganded LolA. Finally, the LolB depletion caused the accumulation of a significant amount of Pal in the periplasm, thereby establishing the conditions for preparation of the homogeneous LolA-lipoprotein complex.     

Structural Investigation of the Interaction between LolA and LolB Using NMR

Lipoproteins that play critical roles in various cellular functions of Gram-negative bacteria are localized in the cells inner and outer membranes. Lol proteins (LolA, LolB, LolC, LolD, and LolE) are involved in the transportation of outer membrane-directed lipoproteins from the inner to the outer membrane. LolA is a periplasmic chaperone that transports lipoproteins, and LolB is an outer membrane receptor that accepts lipoproteins. To clarify the structural basis for the lipoprotein transfer from LolA to LolB, we examined the interaction between LolA and mLolB, a soluble mutant of LolB, using solution NMR spectroscopy. We determined the interaction mode between LolA and mLolB with conformational changes of LolA. Based upon the observations, we propose that the LolA·LolB complex forms a tunnel-like structure, where the hydrophobic insides of LolA and LolB are connected, which enables lipoproteins to transfer from LolA to LolB.Gram-negative bacteria express lipid-modified proteins, lipoproteins, which are anchored to the cellular membrane via acyl chains attached to N-terminal cysteine residues of the lipoproteins. Putative lipoproteins have been found in various bacteria. For example, Escherichia coli has at least 90 types of lipoproteins (1), and the Lyme disease spirochete Borrelia burgdorferi has 105 putative lipoproteins (2). Although little is known about the functions of the majority of lipoproteins, some of the lipoproteins play essential roles in various cellular functions of Gram-negative bacteria, such as cell surface structure stabilization, cell shape maintenance, substrate transport, cell growth, and cell signaling (3).Lipoproteins are located at three cellular membrane sites; they are the periplasmic side of the inner membrane, the periplasmic side of the outer membrane, and the outside of the outer membrane (4). In E. coli most of the lipoproteins are anchored to the periplasmic side of the outer membrane, whereas others are anchored to that of the inner membrane (1). Therefore, the transportation of the lipoproteins to the outer membrane is essential for E. coli.Five Lol proteins, LolA, LolB, LolC, LolD, and LolE, play central roles in the outer membrane-directed lipoprotein localization. The Lol·CDE complex, which is anchored to the inner membrane, transfers the lipoproteins from the membrane to a soluble monomer periplasmic protein, LolA (182 amino acids) in an ATP-dependent manner (5–7). LolA transports the lipoproteins from the inner membrane through the periplasmic space to the outer membrane and transfers them to an outer membrane lipoprotein, LolB (186 amino acids). LolB is anchored to the membrane by acyl chains attached to its N-terminal cysteine, and it finally inserts the lipoproteins into the outer membrane (8–10).Among the Lol proteins the crystal structures of LolA and LolB have been solved. As for LolB, the soluble mutant of LolB, mLolB, in which the N-terminal cysteine residue was replaced with an alanine residue, was used for the structural analysis. Although LolA and mLolB share only 8% primary sequence identity, their tertiary structures are similar to each other (11). The structures of both LolA and mLolB resemble an open β-barrel with a lid. The convex side of the β-barrel is fully solvent-exposed, whereas the concave side is partly exposed (supplemental Fig. S1).The open β-barrels of LolA and LolB comprise 11 antiparallel β-strands (β1–β11) and an extra β-strand, β12 for LolA and β11′ for LolB. The lid is composed of three α-helices (α1–α3) and is embedded in the concave side of the β-barrel. The concave sides of LolA and LolB contain many hydrophobic residues. Therefore, this concave side of the proteins is speculated to be the binding site for the hydrophobic acyl chains of lipoproteins. Interestingly, one of the crystal structures of LolB accommodated a molecule of polyethylene glycol 2000 monomethyl ether, PEGMME2000, on the hydrophobic surface of the concave side (supplemental Fig. S1).The specific interaction between LolA and LolB is a decisive step in correctly sorting lipoproteins from LolA via LolB to the outer membrane. However, the structural aspects of the interaction, which would clarify how LolA transfers lipoproteins to LolB, remain unknown. To address this issue, we focused on the interaction between LolA and LolB.Here we investigated the interaction of LolA with LolB by NMR spectroscopy. We used LolA with a His₆ tag and mLolB, which retain the biological activities similar to those of the wild type protein (8, 12). By exploiting the cross-saturation and paramagnetic relaxation enhancement (PRE)² techniques, we successfully determined the interfacial residues of LolA and mLolB and the relative orientation of the two molecules in the complex. In addition, we identified the binding sites of an acyl chain analogue, decanoate, on LolA and mLolB. The results obtained from the present study not only explain how LolA might achieve lipoprotein transfer to LolB but also may provide new insights into the structural and functional aspects of other fatty acid-binding proteins.     

Crystal structures of bacterial lipoprotein localization factors,LolA and LolB

Lipoproteins having a lipid-modified cysteine at the N-terminus are localized on either the inner or the outer membrane of Escherichia coli depending on the residue at position 2. Five Lol proteins involved in the sorting and membrane localization of lipoprotein are highly conserved in Gram-negative bacteria. We determined the crystal structures of a periplasmic chaperone, LolA, and an outer membrane lipoprotein receptor, LolB. Despite their dissimilar amino acid sequences, the structures of LolA and LolB are strikingly similar to each other. Both have a hydrophobic cavity consisting of an unclosed beta barrel and an alpha-helical lid. The cavity represents a possible binding site for the lipid moiety of lipoproteins. Detailed structural differences between the two proteins provide significant insights into the molecular mechanisms underlying the energy-independent transfer of lipoproteins from LolA to LolB and from LolB to the outer membrane. Furthermore, the structures of both LolA and LolB determined from different crystal forms revealed the distinct structural dynamics regarding the association and dissociation of lipoproteins. The results are discussed in the context of the current model for the lipoprotein transfer from the inner to the outer membrane through a hydrophilic environment.     

Roles of the Protruding Loop of Factor B Essential for the Localization of Lipoproteins (LolB) in the Anchoring of Bacterial Triacylated Proteins to the Outer Membrane

The Lol system comprising five Lol proteins, LolA through LolE, sorts Escherichia coli lipoproteins to outer membranes. The LolCDE complex, an ATP binding cassette transporter in inner membranes, releases outer membrane-specific lipoproteins in an ATP-dependent manner, causing formation of the LolA-lipoprotein complex in the periplasm. LolA transports lipoproteins through the periplasm to LolB on outer membranes. LolB is itself a lipoprotein anchored to outer membranes, although the membrane anchor is functionally dispensable. LolB then localizes lipoproteins to outer membranes through largely unknown mechanisms. The crystal structure of LolB is similar to that of LolA, and it possesses a hydrophobic cavity that accommodates acyl chains of lipoproteins. To elucidate the molecular function of LolB, a periplasmic version of LolB, mLolB, was mutagenized at various conserved residues. Despite the lack of acyl chains, most defective mutants were insoluble. However, a derivative with glutamate in place of leucine 68 was soluble and unable to localize lipoproteins to outer membranes. This leucine is present in a loop protruding from mLolB into an aqueous environment, and no analogous loop is present in LolA. Thus, leucine 68 was replaced with other residues. Replacement by acidic, but not hydrophobic, residues generated for the first time mLolB derivatives that can accept but cannot localize lipoproteins to outer membranes. Moreover, deletion of the leucine with neighboring residues impaired the lipoprotein receptor activity. Based on these observations, the roles of the protruding loop of LolB in the last step of lipoprotein sorting are discussed.     

Deletion of lolB, Encoding an Outer Membrane Lipoprotein, Is Lethal for Escherichia coli and Causes Accumulation of Lipoprotein Localization Intermediates in the Periplasm

Outer membrane lipoproteins of Escherichia coli are released from the inner membrane upon the formation of a complex with a periplasmic chaperone, LolA, followed by localization to the outer membrane. In vitro biochemical analyses revealed that the localization of lipoproteins to the outer membrane generally requires an outer membrane lipoprotein, LolB, and occurs via transient formation of a LolB-lipoprotein complex. On the other hand, a mutant carrying the chromosomal lolB gene under the control of the lac promoter-operator grew normally in the absence of LolB induction if the mutant did not possess the major outer membrane lipoprotein Lpp, suggesting that LolB is only important for the localization of Lpp in vivo. To examine the in vivo function of LolB, we constructed a chromosomal lolB null mutant harboring a temperature-sensitive helper plasmid carrying the lolB gene. At a nonpermissive temperature, depletion of the LolB protein due to loss of the lolB gene caused cessation of growth and a decrease in the number of viable cells irrespective of the presence or absence of Lpp. LolB-depleted cells accumulated the LolA-lipoprotein complex in the periplasm and the mature form of lipoproteins in the inner membrane. Taken together, these results indicate that LolB is the first example of an essential lipoprotein for E. coli and that its depletion inhibits the upstream reactions of lipoprotein trafficking.     

A novel outer membrane lipoprotein, LolB (HemM), involved in the LolA (p20)-dependent localization of lipoproteins to the outer membrane of Escherichia coli.

The Escherichia coli major outer membrane lipoprotein (Lpp) is released from the inner membrane into the periplasm as a complex with a carrier protein, LolA (p20), and is then specifically incorporated into the outer membrane. An outer membrane protein playing a critical role in Lpp incorporation was identified, and partial amino acid sequences of the protein, named LolB, were identical to those of HemM, which has been suggested to play a role in 5-aminolevulinic acid synthesis in the cytosol. In contrast to this suggested role, the deduced amino acid sequence of HemM implied that the gene encodes a novel outer membrane lipoprotein. Indeed, an antibody raised against highly purified LolB revealed its outer membrane localization, and inhibited in vitro Lpp incorporation into the outer membrane. Furthermore, LolB was found to be synthesized as a precursor with a signal sequence and then processed to a lipid-modified mature form. An E.coli strain possessing chromosomal hemM under the control of the lac promoter-operator required IPTG for growth, indicating that hemM (lolB) is an essential gene. Outer membrane prepared from LolB-depleted cells did not incorporate Lpp. When the Lpp-LolA complex was incubated with a water-soluble LolB derivative, Lpp was transferred from LolA to LolB. Based on these results, the outer membrane localization pathway for E.coli lipoprotein is discussed with respect to the functions of LolA and LolB.     

Roles of the hydrophobic cavity and lid of LolA in the lipoprotein transfer reaction in Escherichia coli

LolA, a periplasmic chaperone, binds to outer membrane-specific lipoproteins released from the inner membrane through the action of an ATP-binding cassette transporter, LolCDE and then transfers them to the outer membrane receptor LolB, thereby mediating the inner to outer membrane transport of lipoproteins. The crystal structure of free LolA revealed that it has an internal hydrophobic cavity, which is surrounded by hydrophobic residues and closed by a lid comprising alpha-helices. The hydrophobic cavity most likely represents the binding site for the lipid moiety of a lipoprotein. It is speculated that the lid undergoes opening and closing upon the binding and transfer of lipoproteins, respectively. To determine the functions of the hydrophobic cavity and lid in detail, 14 residues involved in the formation of these structures were subjected to random mutagenesis. Among the obtained 21 LolA derivatives that did not support growth, 14 were active as to the binding of lipoproteins but defective in the transfer of lipoproteins to LolB, causing the periplasmic accumulation of a lipoprotein as a complex with a LolA derivative. A LolA derivative, I93G, bound lipoproteins faster than wild-type LolA did, whereas it did not transfer associated lipoproteins to LolB. When I93G and wild type LolA co-existed, lipoproteins were bound only to I93G; which therefore exhibited a dominant negative property. Another derivative, L59R, was also defective in the transfer of lipoproteins to LolB but did not exhibit a dominant negative property. Taken together, these results indicate that both the hydrophobic cavity and the lid are critically important for not only the binding of lipoproteins but also their transfer.     

Two novel oligosaccharides isolated from a beverage produced by fermentation of a plant extract

An extract from 50 kinds of fruits and vegetables was fermented to produce a new beverage. Natural fermentation of the extract was carried out mainly by lactic acid bacteria (Leuconostoc spp.) and yeast (Zygosaccharomyces spp. and Pichia spp.). Two new saccharides were found in this fermented beverage. The saccharides were isolated using carbon-Celite column chromatography and preparative high performance liquid chromatography. Gas liquid chromatography analysis of methylated derivatives as well as MALDI-TOF MS and NMR measurements were used for structural confirmation. The (1)H and (13)C NMR signals of each saccharide were assigned using 2D-NMR including COSY, HSQC, HSQC-TOCSY, CH(2)-HSQC-TOCSY, and CT-HMBC experiments. The saccharides were identified as beta-D-fructopyranosyl-(2-->6)-beta-D-glucopyranosyl-(1-->3)-D-glucopyranose and beta-D-fructopyranosyl-(2-->6)-[beta-D-glucopyranosyl-(1-->3)]-D-glucopyranose.     

Sorting of lipoproteins to the outer membrane in E. coli

Escherichia coli lipoproteins are anchored to the periplasmic surface of the inner or outer membrane depending on the sorting signal. An ATP-binding cassette (ABC) transporter, LolCDE, releases outer membrane-specific lipoproteins from the inner membrane, causing the formation of a complex between the released lipoproteins and the periplasmic molecular chaperone LolA. When this complex interacts with outer membrane receptor LolB, the lipoproteins are transferred from LolA to LolB and then localized to the outer membrane. The structures of LolA and LolB are remarkably similar to each other. Both have a hydrophobic cavity consisting of an unclosed beta-barrel and an alpha-helical lid. Structural differences between the two proteins reveal the molecular mechanisms underlying the energy-independent transfer of lipoproteins from LolA to LolB. Strong inner membrane retention of lipoproteins occurs with Asp at position 2 and a few limited residues at position 3. The inner membrane retention signal functions as a Lol avoidance signal and inhibits the recognition of lipoproteins by LolCDE, thereby causing their retention in the inner membrane. The positive charge of phosphatidylethanolamine and the negative charge of Asp at position 2 are essential for Lol avoidance. The Lol avoidance signal is speculated to cause the formation of a tight lipoprotein-phosphatidylethanolamine complex that has five acyl chains and therefore cannot be recognized by LolCDE.     

Mechanisms underlying energy-independent transfer of lipoproteins from LolA to LolB, which have similar unclosed {beta}-barrel structures

The Lol system, comprising five Lol proteins, transfers lipoproteins from the inner to the outer membrane of Escherichia coli. Periplasmic LolA accepts lipoproteins from LolCDE in the inner membrane and immediately transfers them to LolB, a receptor anchored to the outer membrane. The unclosed beta-barrel structures of LolA and LolB are very similar to each other and form hydrophobic cavities for lipoproteins. The lipoprotein transfer between these similar structures is unidirectional and very efficient, but requires no energy input. To reveal the mechanisms underlying this lipoprotein transfer, Arg and Phe at positions 43 and 47, respectively, of LolA were systematically mutagenized. The two residues were previously found to affect abilities to accept and transfer lipoproteins. Substitution of Phe-47 with polar residues inhibited the ability to accept lipoproteins from the inner membrane. No derivatives caused periplasmic accumulation of lipoproteins. In contrast, many Arg-43 derivatives caused unusual periplasmic accumulation of lipoproteins to various extents. However, all derivatives, except one having Leu instead of Arg, supported the growth of cells. All Arg-43 derivatives retained the ability to accept lipoproteins from the inner membrane, whereas their abilities to transfer associated lipoproteins to LolB were variously reduced. Assessment of the intensity of the hydrophobic interaction between lipoproteins and Arg-43 derivatives revealed that the LolA-lipoprotein interaction should be weak, otherwise lipoprotein transfer to LolB is inhibited, causing accumulation of lipoproteins in the periplasm.     

The Fermentative Formation of CDP-Choline by Haploid Cells of Yeasts and the Change of the Temperature-sensitivity of a Mutant of a Yeast,Saccharomyces rouxii

Phosphorylation of CMP and formation of CDP-choline were tested with various haploid cells of yeasts. Most of them had more or less the ability, but a mutant (Lys–M7, alpha type) of Saccharomyces rouxii was found to lack the ability. Further study revealed the change of the temperature-sensitivity of the mutant, which could not produce CDP-choline when treated at 37°C, whereas it could at 16°C. The growth of the mutant was more sensitive to temperatures than that of the wild strain. The former did not grow at 36.3°C, while the latter grew.     

1-O-Acetyl-beta-D-galactopyranose: a novel substrate for the transglycosylation reaction catalyzed by the beta-galactosidase from Penicillium sp

1-O-Acetyl-beta-D-galactopyranose (AcGal), a new substrate for beta-galactosidase, was synthesized in a stereoselective manner by the trichloroacetimidate procedure. Kinetic parameters (K(M) and k(cat)) for the hydrolysis of 1-O-acetyl-beta-D-galactopyranose catalyzed by the beta-D-galactosidase from Penicillium sp. were compared with similar characteristics for a number of natural and synthetic substrates. The value for k(cat) in the hydrolysis of AcGal was three orders of magnitude greater than for other known substrates. The beta-galactosidase hydrolyzes AcGal with retention of anomeric configuration. The transglycosylation activity of the beta-D-galactosidase in the reaction of AcGal and methyl beta-D-galactopyranoside (1) as substrates was investigated by 1H NMR spectroscopy and HPLC techniques. The transglycosylation product using AcGal as a substrate was beta-D-galactopyranosyl-(1-->6)-1-O-acetyl-beta-D-galactopyranose (with a yield of approximately 70%). In the case of 1 as a substrate, the main transglycosylation product was methyl beta-D-galactopyranosyl-(1-->6)-beta-D-galactopyranoside. Methyl beta-D-galactopyranosyl-(1-->3)-beta-D-galactopyranoside was found to be minor product in the latter reaction.     

Thermodynamic analysis of mutant lac repressors

The lactose (lac) repressor is an allosteric protein that can respond to environmental changes. Mutations introduced into the DNA binding domain and the effector binding pocket affect the repressor's ability to respond to its environment. We have demonstrated how the observed phenotype is a consequence of altering the thermodynamic equilibrium constants. We discuss mutant repressors, which (1) show tighter repression; (2) induce with a previously noninducing species, orthonitrophenyl-β-d-galactoside; and (3) transform an inducible switch to one that is corepressed. The ability of point mutations to change multiple thermodynamic constants, and hence drastically alter the repressor's phenotype, shows how allosteric proteins can perform a wide array of similar yet distinct functions such as that exhibited in the Lac/Gal family of bacterial repressors.     

Molecular events involved in a single cycle of ligand transfer from an ATP binding cassette transporter, LolCDE, to a molecular chaperone, LolA

An ATP binding cassette transporter LolCDE complex releases lipoproteins from the inner membrane of Escherichia coli in an ATP-dependent manner, leading to the formation of a complex between a lipoprotein and a periplasmic chaperone, LolA. LolA is proposed to undergo a conformational change upon the lipoprotein binding. The lipoprotein is then transferred from the LolA-lipoprotein complex to the outer membrane via LolB. Unlike most ATP binding cassette transporters mediating the transmembrane flux of substrates, the LolCDE complex catalyzes the extrusion of lipoproteins anchored to the outer leaflet of the inner membrane. Moreover, the LolCDE complex is unique in that it can be purified as a liganded form, which is an intermediate of the lipoprotein release reaction. Taking advantage of these unique properties, we established an assay system that enabled the analysis of a single cycle of lipoprotein transfer reaction from liganded LolCDE to LolA in a detergent solution. The LolA-lipoprotein complex thus formed was physiologically functional and delivered lipoproteins to the outer membrane in a LolB-dependent manner. Vanadate, a potent inhibitor of the lipoprotein release from proteoliposomes, was found to inhibit the release of ADP from LolCDE. However, a single cycle of lipoprotein transfer occurred from vanadate-treated LolCDE to LolA, indicating that vanadate traps LolCDE at the energized state.     

Copper-induced oxidation of epinephrine: protective effect of D-DAHK,a synthetic analogue of the high affinity copper binding site of human albumin

Epinephrine is known to be rapidly oxidized during sepsis. Ischemia and acidosis, which often accompany sepsis, are associated with the release of weakly bound cupric ions from plasma proteins. We investigated whether copper promotes oxidation of epinephrine at both physiological and acidic pH and whether D-Asp-D-Ala-D-His-D-Lys (D-DAHK), a human albumin (HSA) N-terminus synthetic peptide with a high affinity for cupric ions, attenuates this oxidation. Epinephrine alone [100 microM] or with CuCl(2) [10 microM], and with CuCl(2) [10 microM] and D-DAHK [20 microM] at pH 7.4, 7.0, 6.5, and 6.0 were incubated for 1h at 37 degrees C. Epinephrine oxidation was measured by the spectrophotometric quantification of its oxidation product, adrenochrome. We found that adrenochrome increased, suggesting copper-induced oxidation of epinephrine. At pH 7.4, 7.0, 6.5, and 6.0, adrenochrome increased by 47%, 53%, 24%, and 6% above baseline, respectively. D-DAHK attenuated the copper-induced oxidation of epinephrine to baseline levels. These in vitro results indicate that copper-induced epinephrine oxidation is greatest at the physiological pH 7.4 as well as in severe acidosis, pH 7.0, and that D-DAHK completely inhibits this oxidation.