p53 codon 72 polymorphism is associated with susceptibility to hepatocellular carcinoma in the Turkish population: a case–control study

The tumor suppressor p53 gene plays a crucial role in preventing carcinogenesis through its ability to induce cell cycle arrest and apoptosis following DNA damage and oncogene activation. A guanine (G)/cytosine (C) common single nucleotide polymorphism (SNP) at second position of codon 72 in exon 4 of p53 gene determines a arginine (Arg) to proline (Pro) (Arg72Pro) aminoacidic substitution within the proline-rich domain of p53 protein. Arg72 and Pro72 allele are different from a biochemical and biological point of view and many reports suggest that they can modulate individual cancer susceptibility. To determine the association of the p53 Arg72Pro polymorphism with the risk of hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) development in a Turkish population, a hospital-based case–control study was designed consisting of 119 subjects with HCC and 119 cancer-free control subjects matched for age, gender, smoking and alcohol status. The genotype frequency of the p53 Arg72Pro polymorphism was determined by using a polymerase chain reaction-restriction fragment length polymorphism (PCR-RFLP) assay. Our data shows that the Pro/Pro genotype of the p53 Arg72Pro polymorphism is associated with increased risk of HCC development in this Turkish population (OR = 3.20, 95% CI: 1.24–8.22, P = 0.02). Furthermore, according to stratified analysis, a significant association was observed between the homozygote Pro/Pro genotype and HCC risk in the subgroups of male gender (OR = 3.01, 95% CI: 1.14–7.97, P = 0.03) and patients with hepatitis B virus (HBV)-related HCC (OR = 4.04, 95% CI: 1.46–11.15, P = 0.007). Because our results suggest for the first time that the Pro/Pro homozygote of p53 Arg72Pro polymorphism may be a genetic susceptibility factor for HCC (especially in the male gender and HBV-infected patients) in the Turkish population, further independent studies are required to validate our findings in a larger series, as well as in patients of different ethnic origins.     

Meta-analysis shows significant association of the <Emphasis Type="Italic">TP53</Emphasis> Arg72Pro with ovarian cancer risk

Growing bodies of studies have been conducted on the association of TP53 Arg72Pro polymorphism with susceptibility to ovarian cancer and have yielded conflicting results. Thus, a meta-analysis was performed to summarize the possible association. 18 case–control studies, including 2,193 ovarian cancer cases and 5,175 controls were identified. The quality of the studies was assessed according to a predefined scale. The strength of the associations between TP53 Arg72Pro polymorphism and ovarian cancer was measured by crude odds ratios (ORs) with 95% confidence intervals (CIs). Overall, no significant association was found between TP53 Arg72Pro polymorphism and ovarian cancer risk when all studies pooled into the meta-analysis in all genetic model. In the subgroup analysis by ethnicity, still no association of this polymorphism with ovarian cancer risk was obtained for all comparison models. However, significantly decreased risks of ovarian cancer were found for Arg/Arg versus Arg/Pro+Pro/Pro (OR 0.84, 95% CI 0.74–0.96) when the analysis was restricted to high quality studies. Conversely, when it was restricted to low quality studies, significantly increased risks were observed for Arg/Arg versus Pro/Pro (OR 1.58, 95% CI 1.09–2.28) and Arg/Arg+Arg/Pro versus Pro/Pro: (OR 1.50, 95% CI 1.10–2.06), which might be spurious due to the poor design of these studies. In conclusion, this meta-analysis suggests that the Arg allele is at a moderately reduced risk for ovarian cancer and this polymorphism might protect against ovarian carcinogenesis.     

<Emphasis Type="Italic">TGFBR1</Emphasis>*6A/9A polymorphism and cancer risk: a meta-analysis of 13,662 cases and 14,147 controls

Published data on the association between TGFBR1*6A/9A polymorphism and cancer risk are inconclusive. To derive a more precise estimation of the relationship, a meta-analysis was performed. A total of 32 studies including 13,662 cases and 14,147 controls were involved in this meta-analysis. Overall, significantly elevated cancer risks were associated with TGFBR1*6A in all genetic models (for allelic effect: OR = 1.11; 95% CI = 1.03–1.21; for 6A/6A vs. 9A/9A: OR = 1.30; 95% CI = 1.01–1.69; for 9A/6A vs. 9A/9A: OR = 1.08; 95% CI = 1.01–1.15; for dominant model: OR = 1.08; 95% CI = 1.02–1.15; for recessive model: OR = 1.29; 95% CI = 1.00–1.68). In the subgroup analysis by cancer types, significant associations were found in breast cancer (for allelic effect: OR = 1.16; 95% CI = 1.01–1.34) and ovarian cancer (for allelic effect: OR = 1.24; 95% CI = 1.00–1.54; for 6A/6A vs. 9A/9A: OR = 2.34; 95% CI = 1.03–5.33). However, no significant associations were found in colorectal cancer, bladder cancer, prostate cancer and lung cancer for all genetic models. In summary, this meta-analysis suggests that the TGFBR1*6A/9A polymorphism is associated with cancer susceptibility, increasing the risk of breast and ovarian cancer.     

Study on the association of p53 codon 72 polymorphisms with risk of gastric cancer in high incidence Hexi area of Gansu Province in China

To investigate the possible association of P53 codon 72 Arg/Pro polymorphisms with risk of gastric cancer in the high incidence Hexi area of Gansu province in China. Blood samples from 140 patients with gastric carcinoma and 125 healthy controls were collected in Hexi area of Gansu province. Polymorphism of P53Arg72Pro was genotyped by PCR-TaqMan. For detection Helicobacter pylori infection, Warhin–Starry staining was used. Three kinds of polymorphisms of P53Arg72Pro were Arg/Arg, Arg/Pro, Pro/Pro. The frequencies in gastric cancer group were 15.7, 60.0, 24.3%, and the frequencies in healthy controls were 25.6, 54.4, 20.0%, respectively. P53 codon 72 Pro carrier genotype (Arg/Pro + Pro/Pro) increased risk of gastric carcinoma with an odds ratio 1.840 (95% CI: 1.006–3.387). Helicobacter pylori infection rate was 68.6% in patients group and 50.4% in healthy controls. Helicobacter pylori infection rate in gastric cancer patients was remarkably higher than that in the controls (OR: 2.147, 95% CI: 1.302–3.541, P = 0.003). Stratification analysis showed that P53 codon 72 Pro carrier genotype with Helicobacter pylori infection was significantly higher in cases than that in the controls (OR: 4.182, 95% CI: 1.850–9.454). P53Arg72Pro polymorphisms could be a risk factor for gastric cancer in high incidence Hexi area of Gansu Province in China. P53 codon 72 Pro carrier genotype and Helicobacter pylori positive infection may have a synergistic effect on gastric cancer in high incidence Hexi area of Gansu Province in China.     

Association of p53 codon 72 polymorphism with prostate cancer: a meta-analysis

Relationship of prostate cancer with the polymorphism of p53 codon 72 was reported with inconsistent results. The purpose of this study was to quantitatively evaluate the association between p53 codon 72 polymorphism and prostate cancer susceptibility. We performed an extensive search of relevant studies and made a meta-analysis, including 8 studies with 815 prostate cancer cases and 1047 controls. The combined results showed that there were no significant differences in genotype distribution between prostate cancer cases and control on the basis of all studies, CC/GC versus GG (OR = 1.24, 95% CI: 0.93–1.65), GG/GC versus CC (OR = 0.96, 95% CI: 0.60–1.55), GC versus GG (OR = 1.27, 95% CI: 0.91–1.77), CC versus GG (OR = 1.25, 95% CI:0.74–2.12), GC versus CC (OR = 1.09, 95% CI: 0.63–1.87). When stratifying for the race, there were also no statistically significant differences in genotype distribution between prostate cancer cases and controls. This meta-analysis did not provide an evidence of confirming association between p53 codon 72 polymorphism and prostate cancer.     

Evaluating the Association between p53 Codon 72 Arg>Pro Polymorphism and Risk of Ovary Cancer: A Meta-Analysis

Aim

Allelic polymorphism in codon 72 of the p53 tumor suppressor gene causes imbalance of p53 protein expression. Earlier studies have shown association between allelic polymorphism in codon 72 of the p53 gene with risk of ovary cancer (OC); however the results are inconclusive and conflicting. Therefore, we performed this meta-analysis to investigate the relation between p53 codon 72 Arg>Pro polymorphism and overall OC susceptibility.

Methods

We searched all eligible published studies based on the association between codon 72 of the p53 Arg>Pro polymorphism and risk of OC. Data were pooled together from individual studies and meta-analysis was performed. Pooled odds ratios (ORs) and 95% CI were calculated for allele contrast, homozygous, heterozygous, dominant and recessive genetic models.

Results

A total of twelve studies comprising of 993 OC cases and 1264 healthy controls were included in this meta-analysis. Overall, no significant association was detected for Pro allele carrier (Pro vs. Arg: p = 0.916; OR = 0.980, 95% CI = 0.677 to 1.419), homozygous (Pro/Pro vs. Arg/Arg: p = 0.419; OR = 0.731, 95% CI = 0.341 to 1.564), heterozygous (Arg/Pro vs. Arg/Arg: p = 0.248; OR = 1.237, 95% CI = 0.862 to 1.773), dominant (Pro/Pro+Arg/Pro vsArg/Arg: p = 0.699; OR = 1.089, 95% CI = 0.706 to 1.681), and recessive (Pro/Pro vs Arg/Arg+Arg/Pro: p = 0.329; OR = 0.754, 95% CI = 0.428 to 1.329) genetic models, respectively. Also, in the stratified analysis by ethnicity, no significant association of this polymorphism with risk of OC was found in the Caucasian population.

Conclusions

This meta-analysis suggested that codon 72 of the p53 Arg>Pro polymorphism may not significantly contribute in ovary cancer susceptibility. However, future large studies with gene-gene and gene-environment interactions are needed to validate these findings.     

Association of TP53 codon 72 and CDH1 genetic polymorphisms with colorectal cancer risk in Bangladeshi population

Till now no pharmacogenetic study of TP53 codon 72 (Arg72Pro) and CDH1 rs16260 (-160C<A) genes has been reported on Bangladeshi population relating those with colorectal cancer. So the aim of the study is to determine whether there is an elevated risk of colorectal cancer development with TP53 codon 72 and CDH1 rs16260 genetic polymorphism in Bangladeshi population for the first time. To investigate the association of these two SNPs, we conducted a case-control study with 288 colorectal cancer patients and 295 healthy volunteers by using polymerase chain reaction restriction fragment length polymorphism (PCR-RFLP) method. We found an increased risk of association between Arg/Pro heterozygosity (adjusted OR = 2.58, 95% CI = 1.77–3.77, p < 0.05) and Pro/Pro mutant homozygosity (adjusted OR = 2.92, 95% CI = 1.78–4.78, p < 0.05) along with the combined genotype (Arg/Pro + Pro/Pro) (adjusted OR = 2.70, 95% CI = 1.90–3.82, p < 0.05) and colorectal cancer predisposition. In case of CDH1 rs16260 polymorphism, C/A heterozygous and A/A mutant homozygous are significantly (p < 0.05) found to be associated with colorectal cancer risk with adjusted OR of 1.94 and 2.63, respectively. The combined genotype of C/A and A/A was also found to be strongly associated with colorectal cancer risk compared to C/C genotype (adjusted OR = 2.02, 95% CI = 1.42–2.87, p < 0.05). In conclusion, heterozygosity and mutant homozygosity as well as the combination of both TP53 Arg72Pro and CDH1 rs16260 polymorphisms are responsible to increase the risk of colorectal cancer development in Bangladeshi population.     

p53 codon 72 polymorphism and Hematological Cancer Risk: An Update Meta-Analysis

Background

Previous studies on the association of p53 codon 72 (Arg72Pro) polymorphism with hematological malignancies risk have produced conflicting results. The purpose of this meta-analysis is to define the effect of p53 Arg72Pro polymorphism on hematological malignancies risk.

Methodology/Principal Findings

Through searching PubMed databases (or hand searching) up to April 2012 using the following MeSH terms and keywords: “p53”, “codon 72” “polymorphism” and “leukemia”, or “lymphoma”, or “myeloma”, thirteen were identified as eligible articles in this meta-analysis for p53 Arg72Pro polymorphism (2,731 cases and 7, 356 controls), including nine studies on leukemia (1,266 cases and 4, 474 controls), three studies on lymphoma (1,359 cases and 2,652 controls), and one study on myeloma. The overall results suggested that p53 Arg72Pro polymorphism was not associated with hematological malignancies risk. In stratified analyses, significantly increased non-Hodgkin lymphomas risk was found in p53 Arg72Pro polymorphism heterozygote model (Arg/Pro vs. Arg/Arg: OR = 1.18, 95%CI: 1.02–1.35) and dominant model (Arg/Pro+Pro/Pro vs. Arg/Arg: OR = 1.18, 95%CI: 1.03–1.34), but no significant association was found between leukemia risk and p53 Arg72Pro polymorphism. Further studies showed no association between leukemia risk and p53 Arg72Pro polymorphism when stratified in subtypes of leukemias, ethnicities and sources of controls.

Conclusions/Significance

This meta-analysis indicates that the p53 Arg72Pro polymorphism may contribute to susceptibility to non-Hodgkin lymphomas.     

CDH1 promoter polymorphism and stomach cancer susceptibility

The relationship of stomach cancer susceptibility and the presence of E-cadherin (CDH1) promoter −160 C/A polymorphism had been reported with conflicting results. To further explore the association of this polymorphism with stomach cancer susceptibility, we performed an extensive search of relevant studies and carried out a meta-analysis to obtain a more precise estimate. A total of 16 studies including 2,611 cases and 3,788 controls were involved in this meta-analysis. When all studies involved, the meta-analysis results suggest no statistically significant association between CDH1 −160 C/A polymorphism and stomach cancer risk (CA vs. CC: OR = 1.01, 95% CI: 0.85–1.19; AA vs. CC: OR = 1.05, 95% CI: 0.75–1.46; dominant model: OR = 1.02, 95% CI: 0.86–1.20; recessive model: OR = 1.04, 95% CI: 0.76–1.41). When subgroup analyses were performed by ethnicity, the A-allele carriers conferred a decreased stomach cancer risk in Asians (AA vs. CC: OR = 0.67, 95% CI: 0.47–0.96; dominant model: OR = 0.85, 95% CI: 0.72–0.99), but no statistically significant association was found in Caucasians. In conclusion, this meta-analysis suggests that CDH1 −160 A-allele may play a protective role of stomach cancer development in Asians but not in Caucasians.     

Quantitative assessment of the association between TP53 Arg72Pro polymorphism and bladder cancer risk

Previous studies investigating the association between TP53 Arg72Pro polymorphism and bladder cancer risk reported controversial results. To quantify the strength of association between TP53 Arg72Pro polymorphism and bladder cancer risk, we performed this meta-analysis. We searched PubMed, Embase and Wangfang databases for studies relating the association between TP53 Arg72Pro polymorphism and bladder cancer risk. We used the pooled odds ratios (ORs) with their 95 % confidence intervals (95 % CIs) to assess the association. Finally, data were available from a total of 16 case–control studies including a total of 5, 545 subjects (2,345 cases and 3,200 controls). Meta-analysis of all 16 studies showed TP53 Arg72Pro polymorphism was not associated with bladder cancer risk (All P values were more than 0.10). Subgroup analyses by ethnicity showed that TP53 Arg72Pro polymorphism contributed to bladder cancer risk in East Asians in three genetic models (For Pro vs. Arg, Fixed-effects OR 1.18, 95 % CI 1.05–1.32; For ProPro vs. ArgArg, Fixed-effects OR 1.40, 95 % CI 1.11–1.77; For ProPro vs. ArgPro/ArgArg, Fixed-effects OR 1.32, 95 % CI 1.07–1.62). However, there was no significant association in Caucasians and the others (All P values were more than 0.05). Heterogeneity analyses suggested ethnicity was the major sources of heterogeneity. Thus, meta-analyses of available data suggest the Pro variant of TP53 Arg72Pro contributes to bladder cancer risk in East Asians. Besides, TP53 Arg72Pro polymorphism may have race-specific effects on bladder cancer risk and further studies are needed to elucidate this possible effect.     

Combined analysis of the association between p73 G4C14-to-A4T14 polymorphisms and cancer risk

P73 is a structural and functional homologue of p53, and plays an important role in regulating cell cycle and apoptosis. A potentially functional polymorphism (designated as p73 G4C14-to-A4T14) has been identified in a region in exon 2 of the p73 gene, which may theoretically form a stem-loop structure and thereby affect p73 expression. Several investigations have reported the correlation between p73 G4C14-to-A4T14 polymorphism and cancer risk. However, the results are inconclusive. To further assess the association between p73 polymorphism and cancer risk, we performed meta-analysis of the data sets obtained from 26 individual studies involving 8,148 cancer patients and 8,150 controls. The association between p73 G4C14-to-A4T14 polymorphism and cancer risk was determined by crude odd ratios (OR) with 95% CI (confidential interval). AT-allele carriers were found to have a significantly increased risk of cervical cancer (AT/GC vs. GC/GC, OR = 1.63, 95% CI = 1.14–2.33; AT/AT + AT/GC vs. GC/GC, OR = 1.49, 95% CI = 1.05–2.10), colorectal cancer (AT/AT vs. AT/GC + GC/GC, OR = 1.98, 95% CI = 1.25–3.12), head and neck cancer (AT/AT + AT/GC vs. GC/GC, OR = 1.44, 95% CI = 1.06–1.96) and other cancers (AT/AT vs. GC/GC, OR = 1.78, 95% CI = 1.24–2.57; AT/AT vs. AT/GC + GC/GC, OR = 1.80, 95% CI = 1.26–2.56). In the stratified analysis of ethnicity, a significantly elevated cancer risk was found in Caucasians (AT/AT + AT/GC vs. GC/GC, OR = 1.18, 95% CI = 1.08–1.30; allele AT vs. allele GC, OR = 1.15, 95% CI = 1.06–1.24). No significant association of p73 polymorphism with the cancer risk of smoking was detected by stratified analysis by smoking status. Together, our data suggest that the p73 G4C14-to-A4T14 may be a risk factor of cancer especially in Caucasians.     

A p53 codon 72 polymorphism associated with prostate cancer development and progression in Japanese

An association between the Pro/Pro genotype of p53 codon 72 and a lower risk of prostate cancer in Caucasians was recently reported. However, the association of this polymorphism with prostate cancer risk in a Japanese population has not been clarified. We performed a case-control study consisting of 114 prostate cancer patients and 105 noncancer controls. Sixty-nine percent (79 of 114) of the patients had a positive family history. The genotypic frequencies in the controls were 39.0% for Arg/Arg, 54.3% for Arg/Pro and 6.7% for Pro/Pro; they were in Hardy-Weinberg equilibrium. When a comparison of the distribution of the p53 codon 72 polymorphism was made between patients with a first-degree family history and all control subjects, the adjusted odds ratios (ORs) for prostate cancer associated with the Arg/Arg, Arg/Pro and Pro/Pro genotypes were 1.00, 0.99 [95% confidence interval (CI) 0.53-1.88] and 2.80 (95% CI 1.04-7.53), respectively. When stratification of cases was performed based on clinical stage (localized or metastatic cancer) and pathological grade (a Gleason score of <7 or > or =7), there tended to be a greater number of patients with localized cancers among those patients with the Arg/Pro genotype than among those with the Arg/Arg genotype (overall cases: age-adjusted OR 0.36, 95% CI 0.13-1.00, p = 0.049; positive family history cases: age-adjusted OR 0.25, 95% CI 0.075-0.84, p = 0.025). In addition, there tended to be a greater number of patients with low-grade cancers among those with the Pro/Pro genotype than among those with other genotypes (overall cases: age-adjusted OR 0.41, 95% CI 0.13-1.30, p = 0.13; positive family history cases: age-adjusted OR 0.20, 95% CI 0.004-0.89, p = 0.035). The present findings suggest that the Pro/Pro genotype of p53 codon 72 played a role in prostate cancer susceptibility in a Japanese population. However, the Pro allele did not appear to worsen such clinical parameters as clinical stage or pathological grade.     

XPA A23G polymorphism and susceptibility to cancer: a meta-analysis

Xeroderma pigmentosum group A (XPA) participates in modulating recognition of DNA damage during the DNA nucleotide excision repair process. The XPA A23G polymorphism has been investigated in case–control studies to evaluate the cancer risk attributed to the variant, but the results were conflicting. To clarify the effect of XPA A23G polymorphism in cancer risk, we conducted a meta-analysis that included 30 published case–control studies. Overall, no significant association of XPA A23G variant with cancer susceptibility was observed for any genetic model. However, significant association was observed for colorectal cancer (GG vs. AA: OR = 1.68, 95% CI = 1.15–2.44; dominant genetic model GG + AG vs. AA: OR = 1.54, 95% CI = 1.08–1.17), for breast cancer an increased but non-significant risk was found (GG vs. AA: OR = 1.27, 95% CI = 0.98–1.66; dominant genetic model GG + AG vs. AA: OR = 1.27, 95% CI = 0.99–1.63), and for head and neck cancer an increased risk was observed in recessive model (OR = 1.19, 95% CI = 1.02–1.38), whereas for lung cancer a significant reduced risk was observed (GG vs. AA: OR = 0.77, 95% CI = 0.66–0.90; dominant genetic model GG + AG vs. AA: OR = 0.76, 95% CI = 0.66–0.87), it’s noting that in Asian population the inverse association was more apparent. In addition, in Asian population for esophageal cancer a significant decreased risk was also found in dominant genetic model (OR = 0.55; 95% CI = 0.43–0.70) and for head and neck cancer an increased risk was observed in dominant genetic model (OR = 1.51, 95% CI = 1.03–2.23). The meta-analysis suggested that the XPA A23G G allele is a low-penetrant risk factor for cancer development.     

Association between ATM polymorphisms and cancer risk: a meta-analysis

To date, epidemiological studies have assessed the association between Ataxia-telangiectasia mutated (ATM) gene polymorphisms and cancer risk, including lung cancer, breast cancer, glioma and pancreatic cancer. However, the results of these studies remain controversial. We aimed to examine the associations between two SNPs (rs664143 and rs664677) and cancer risk by conducting a meta-analysis of case–control studies. A total of 12 publications were included in this meta-analysis, 8 for rs664143 and 7 for rs664677. Overall, rs664143 heterozygote carriers turned out to be associated with cancer risk (OR = 1.18, 95% CI 1.02–1.36). In the subgroup analysis by cancer type, we observed that the ATM rs664143 polymorphism was significantly associated with lung cancer risk (GA vs. GG: OR = 1.48, 95% CI 1.18–1.85, AA vs. GG: OR = 1.51, 95% CI 1.18–1.93) and rs664677 polymorphism was associated with decreased lung cancr risk and increased breast cancer risk (for lung cancer: TC vs. TT: OR = 0.76, 95% CI 0.62–0.92, CC vs. TT: OR = 0.80, 95% CI 0.64–0.99 and for breast cancer: TC vs. TT: OR = 1.42, 95% CI 1.17–1.73, CC vs. TT: OR = 1.51, 95% CI 1.21–1.87). In the subgroup analysis by region, we also observed that individuals with ATM rs664143 GA or AA genotype had an obvious increased cancer risk among Asian people (GA vs. GG: OR = 1.40, 95% CI 1.20–1.63, AA vs. GG: OR = 1.37, 95% CI 1.16–1.62). In conclusion, ATM rs664143 polymorphism was associated with cancer susceptibility. ATM rs664143 polymorphism was significantly associated with lung cancer risk. ATM rs664677 polymorphism was associated with decreased lung cancer risk as well as increased breast cancer risk.     

<Emphasis Type="Italic">Complement factor H</Emphasis> Y402H gene polymorphism and coronary heart disease susceptibility: a meta-analysis

The complement factor H (CFH) Y402H (T1277C) gene polymorphism has been reported to be associated with coronary heart disease (CHD), but results were conflicting. To evaluate the role of the variant in CHD, we performed meta-analyses of all available data. Both electronic and manual searches were performed, all relevant studies were identified. ORs with 95% confidential intervals (CI) under codominant (CC versus TT, TC versus TT), dominant (CC + TC versus TT) and recessive (CC versus TT + TC) models were calculated. Publication bias was addressed. Ten studies including 11 cohorts comprising of 29,764 participants were included. No association between the CFH T1227C polymorphism and CHD could be found. (For overall analysis: dominant model, OR = 1.04, 95%CI: 0.97–1.11; recessive model, OR = 1.04, 95%CI: 0.97–1.11; for Caucasian subgroup: OR = 1.08 95%CI: 0.92–1.27; recessive model, OR = 1.03, 95%CI: 0.96–1.11). Two studies reported positive results in separate population (Caucasian study: recessive model, OR = 0.51, 95%CI: 0.30–0.86; Asians study: dominant model, OR = 2.37, 95%CI: 1.13–4.96). Current evidence do not support the association between the CFH T1277C polymorphism and CHD risk among common population. The association, which could be influenced by CHD onset age, CHD risk factors status and genetics backgrounds, might be significant in some population. More studies on different CHD onset ages and risk factor status should be encouraged.     

P53 polymorphism and lung cancer susceptibility: a pooled analysis of 32 case–control studies

To explore the real association between p53 codon 72 polymorphism and lung cancer risk, a pooled analysis of 32 case–control studies involving 19,255 subjects was conducted. When all 32 studies were pooled into the analysis, significantly elevated lung cancer risks were associated with variant genotypes in all genetic models (for Pro/Arg vs. Arg/Arg: OR 1.21, 95% CI 1.01–1.23; for Pro/Pro vs. Arg/Arg: OR 1.20, 95% CI 1.03–1.39; for Pro/Pro + Pro/Arg vs. Arg/Arg: OR 1.14, 95% CI 1.03–1.25; for Pro/Pro vs. Arg/Arg + Pro/Arg: OR 1.06, 95% CI 1.01–1.12). In the subgroup analysis by ethnicity, histological type, or smoking status, significantly increased risks were found in subgroups such as Asians, Caucasians, lung adenocarcinoma patients, or smokers, respectively. In conclusion, our results suggest that the Pro allele at p53 codon 72 is emerging as a low-penetrance susceptibility allele for lung cancer development.     

Association of a LSP1 gene rs3817198T>C polymorphism with breast cancer risk: evidence from 33,920 cases and 35,671 controls

Published data on the association between lymphocyte-specific protein 1 (LSP1) rs3817198T>C polymorphism and breast cancer risk are inconclusive. Hence, we conducted a meta-analysis of the LSP1 gene and risk of breast cancer to obtain the most reliable estimate of the association. PubMed, Embase and Web of Science databases were searched. Crude odds ratios (ORs) with 95% confidence intervals (CIs) were extracted and pooled to assess the strength of the association between the LSP1 rs3817198T>C polymorphism and risk of breast cancer. A total of seven eligible studies including 33,920 cases and 35,671 controls based on the search criteria were involved in this meta-analysis. The distributions of genotypes in the controls were all in agreement with Hardy–Weinberg equilibrium. We observed that the LSP1 rs3817198T>C polymorphism was significantly correlated with breast cancer risk when all studies were pooled into the meta-analysis (the allele contrast model: OR = 1.06, 95% CI = 1.04–1.08; the homozygote codominant: OR = 1.14, 95% CI = 1.01–1.28). In the stratified analysis by ethnicity, significant association was observed in Caucasians for CC versus TT homozygote codominant model (OR = 1.25; 95% CI = 1.03–1.52) and for the recessive model (OR = 1.22; 95% CI = 1.02–1.47). There was significant association observed in Africans for CC versus TT homozygote codominant model (OR = 0.45; 95% CI = 0.22–0.92) and for the recessive model (OR = 0.43; 95% CI=0.22–0.88). Also, significant association was observed in mixed ethnicities for CC versus TT homozygote codominant model (OR = 1.12; 95% CI = 1.05–1.19). When stratified by study design, statistically significantly elevated risk was found in nested case–control studies (CC vs. TT: OR = 1.12, 95% CI = 1.05–1.19). But no significant association was observed for all comparison models between LSP1 rs3817198T>C polymorphism and breast cancer risk in hospital-based and people-based studies. When stratified by BRCA1 mutation carriers status, statistically significantly elevated risk was found in this meta-analysis (the allele contrast model: OR = 1.07, 95% CI = 1.01–1.14; the dominant model: OR = 1.09, 95% CI = 1.00–1.18). And significant association was found in the BRCA2 mutation carriers in the allele contrast (OR = 1.11, 95% CI = 1.03–1.20), the homozygote codominant (OR = 1.23, 95% CI = 1.04–1.47), the heterozygote codominant (OR = 1.12, 95% CI = 1.00–1.25) and the dominant models (OR = 1.14, 95% CI = 1.03–1.27). There was significant association between LSP1 rs3817198T>C polymorphism and breast cancer risk in BRCA1 and BRCA2 positive cohort in all comparison models (the allele contrast model: OR = 1.08, 95% CI = 1.03–1.13; CC vs. TT: OR = 1.16, 95% CI = 1.05–1.29; TC vs. TT: OR = 1.09, 95% CI = 1.01–1.16; the dominant model: OR = 1.10, 95% CI = 1.03–1.17; the recessive model: OR = 1.12, 95% CI = 1.01–1.23). In conclusion, this meta-analysis suggests that the LSP1 rs3817198T>C polymorphism is a low-penetrant risk factor for developing breast cancer but may not be in Africans.     

Meta-analysis demonstrates no association between p53 codon 72 polymorphism and prostate cancer risk

We examined whether p53 codon 72 polymorphism confers prostate cancer risk by conducting a meta-analysis. Two investigators independently searched the Pubmed, Embase and CBM databases. This meta-analysis was made of seven case-control studies, that included 892 prostate cancer cases and 1020 healthy controls. Meta-analysis results based on all the studies showed no significant association between p53 codon 72 polymorphism and prostate cancer risk in the comparisons of Pro allele vs Arg allele; Pro/Pro + Pro/Arg vs Arg/Arg; Pro/Pro vs Pro/Arg + Arg/Arg; Pro/Pro vs Arg/Arg, and Pro/Arg vs Arg/Arg [odds ratio (OR) = 1.09, 95% confidence interval (CI) = 0.87-1.36, P = 0.47; OR = 1.22, 95%CI = 0.86-1.73, P = 0.27; OR = 1.03, 95%CI = 0.62-1.72, P = 0.91; OR = 1.22, 95%CI = 0.66-2.26, P = 0.52; OR = 1.25, 95%CI = 0.84-1.87, P = 0.27, respectively]. In the subgroup analysis by ethnicity, no association was found between p53 codon 72 polymorphism and prostate cancer risk both in Caucasian and Asian populations. We found no association between p53 codon 72 polymorphism and prostate cancer risk.     

Association of p53 Arg72Pro polymorphism with gastric cancer: a meta-analysis

Background: p53 tumor suppressor gene Arg72Pro polymorphism has been associated with gastric cancer. However, results were inconsistent. We performed this meta-analysis to estimate the association between p53 Arg72Pro polymorphism and gastric cancer.

Methods: An electronic search of PubMed was conducted to select studies. Studies containing available genotype frequencies of Arg72Pro were chosen, and the association was assess by pooled odds ratio (ORs) with 95% confidence interval (CIs).

Results: The meta-analysis suggested that the p53 Arg72Pro was associated with the gastric cancer risk (Additive model: OR = 1.149, 95% CI = 1.045–1.263, p = 0.004; Dominant model: OR = 1.18, 95% CI = 1.049–1.328, p = 0.006; Recessive model: OR = 1.202, 95% CI = 1.013–1.427, p = 0.035) in Asian subgroup.

Conclusion: This meta-analysis suggests that p53 Arg72Pro polymorphism is associated with increased risk of gastric cancer in Asians.     

Effect of LEPR Gln223Arg polymorphism on breast cancer risk in different ethnic populations: a meta-analysis

Leptin and leptin receptor have been implicated in processes leading to breast cancer initiation and progression. An A to G transition mutation in codon 223, in exon 6 of the leptin receptor gene (LEPR) can result in glutamine to arginine substitution (Gln223Arg). A variety of case–control studies have been published evaluating the association between LEPR Gln223Arg polymorphism and breast cancer. However, published studies have yielded contradictory conclusions. This meta-analysis enrolled eight studies to estimate the overall risk of LEPR Gln223Arg polymorphism associated with breast cancer. The pooled ORs were performed for codominant model (Arg/Arg versus Gln/Gln; Arg/Gln versus Gln/Gln), dominant model (Arg/Arg + Arg/Gln versus Gln/Gln), recessive model (Arg/Arg versus Arg/Gln + Gln/Gln). Overall significantly elevated breast cancer risk was found for recessive model (OR 1.32, 95% CI 1.03–1.69) and for genotype Arg/Gln versus Gln/Gln (OR 1.16, 95% CI 1.01–1.34). In the stratified analysis by ethnicity, significantly increased risks were also found among Africans for genotype Arg/Arg versus Gln/Gln: OR 1.86, 95% CI 1.28–2.71, Arg/Gln versus Gln/Gln: OR 1.48, 95% CI 1.10–1.99, dominant model: OR 1.60, 95% CI 1.21–2.11 and recessive model: OR 1.48, 95% CI 1.07–2.05; for Asians, Arg/Arg versus Gln/Gln: OR 6.79, 95% CI 3.42–13.47 and dominant model: OR 2.03, 95% CI 1.42–2.90. However, no significantly increased risk was found among Europeans for all genetic models. In conclusion, the LEPR 223Arg is a low-penetrant risk for developing breast cancer, especially for black African women.