Photosynthetic CO2 uptake byZea mays leaves as influenced by unilateral irradiation of adaxial and abaxial leaf surfaces

A study was made on the effect of increasing photon fluence rate (I) at a unilateral irradiation of adaxial (normal leaf position) and abaxial (inverse leaf position) blade surface of maize leaves of various insertion levels on net photosynthetic CO₂ uptake (P _n ) by the leaves, as well as the contribution of individual surfaces toP _n of the leaves, and the significance of, or relationship between the stomatal (g _s ) and intracellular (gm) conductances at the CO₂ transport.P _n of leaves of various age according to their insertion level was unaffected by the direction of incident irradiation. Upon irradiation of the leaves in normal and inverse position the contribution of the adaxial and abaxial surfaces toP _n ,g _s and g_m was different. On irradiating the leaves in normal position, the contribution of the irradiated adaxial surface to the characteristics mentioned made on the average 55% of total values, the contribution of the abaxial surface irradiated in inverse position made on the average 70% inP _n andg _m , and 80% ing _s . At lowerI’s g _m was higher thang _s both in irradiated and non-irradiated surfaces. The ratio ofg _s to g_m gradually got square with increasingI. In the irradiated adaxial surface the equilibrium (g _s /g _m = 1.0) took place at the highestI’s, in the irradiated abaxial surface between 500 to 1000 μmol m⁻² s⁻¹. The significance of the ratiog _m in the CO₂ transport through the individual surfaces is discussed.     

Contribution of the adaxial and abaxial surfaces of olive leaves to photosynthesis

Leaves of olive cultivars Frantoio and Maurino were irradiated with different irradiances from above, from below, or simultaneously from both directions to determine the contribution of the abaxial and adaxial leaf surfaces to photosynthesis. In both cultivars, irradiation of both sides of the leaf caused increases in net photosynthetic rate (P _N) and apparent quantum yield compared to irradiating only one surface with the equal photosynthetic photon flux density (PPFD), but the PPFD needed to saturate P _N decreased. At high and medium PPFD the P _N determined at irradiating both leaf surfaces was less than the sum obtained at irradiation of only the upper or the lower surface with the same PPFD. At PPFD higher than 1000 μmol m-2 s-1 in cv. Frantoio and 1200 μmol m-2 s-1 in cv. Maurino, P _N did not vary. At low PPFD (<200 μmol m-2 s-1), P _N at irradiating the adaxial and abaxial leaf surfaces simultaneously was about the sum of the values obtained by irradiating the upper and lower surfaces separately. Consequently the compensation irradiance was reduced from about 50 μmol m-2 s-1 to about 30 μmol m-2 s-1 when irradiating both leaf surfaces. The natural leaf orientation of the olive cultivar influenced the utilization of radiant energy by the abaxial surface. This revised version was published online in September 2006 with corrections to the Cover Date.     

The proteolytic function of the Arabidopsis 26S proteasome is required for specifying leaf adaxial identity

Polarity formation is central to leaf morphogenesis, and several key genes that function in adaxial-abaxial polarity establishment have been identified and characterized extensively. We previously reported that Arabidopsis thaliana ASYMMERTIC LEAVES1 (AS1) and AS2 are important in promoting leaf adaxial fates. We obtained an as2 enhancer mutant, asymmetric leaves enhancer3 (ae3), which demonstrated pleiotropic plant phenotypes, including a defective adaxial identity in some leaves. The ae3 as2 double mutant displayed severely abaxialized leaves, which were accompanied by elevated levels of leaf abaxial promoting genes FILAMENTOUS FLOWER, YABBY3, KANADI1 (KAN1), and KAN2 and a reduced level of the adaxial promoting gene REVOLUTA. We identified AE3, which encodes a putative 26S proteasome subunit RPN8a. Furthermore, double mutant combinations of as2 with other 26S subunit mutations, including rpt2a, rpt4a, rpt5a, rpn1a, rpn9a, pad1, and pbe1, all displayed comparable phenotypes with those of ae3 as2, albeit with varying phenotypic severity. Since these mutated genes encode subunits that are located in different parts of the 26S proteasome, it is possible that the proteolytic function of the 26S holoenzyme is involved in leaf polarity formation. Together, our findings reveal that posttranslational regulation is essential in proper leaf patterning.     

Novel as1 and as2 defects in leaf adaxial-abaxial polarity reveal the requirement for ASYMMETRIC LEAVES1 and 2 and ERECTA functions in specifying leaf adaxial identity

The shoot apical meristem (SAM) of seed plants is the site at which lateral organs are formed. Once organ primordia initiate from the SAM, they establish polarity along the adaxial-abaxial, proximodistal and mediolateral axes. Among these three axes, the adaxial-abaxial polarity is of primary importance in leaf patterning. In leaf development, once the adaxial-abaxial axis is established within leaf primordia, it provides cues for proper lamina growth and asymmetric development. It was reported previously that the Arabidopsis ASYMMETRIC LEAVES1 (AS1) and ASYMMETRIC LEAVES2 (AS2) genes are two key regulators of leaf polarity. In this work, we demonstrate a new function of the AS1 and AS2 genes in the establishment of adaxial-abaxial polarity by analyzing as1 and as2 alleles in the Landsberg erecta (Ler) genetic background. We provide genetic evidence that the Arabidopsis ERECTA (ER) gene is involved in the AS1-AS2 pathway to promote leaf adaxial fate. In addition, we show that AS1 and AS2 bind to each other, suggesting that AS1 and AS2 may form a complex that regulates the establishment of leaf polarity. We also report the effects on leaf polarity of overexpression of the AS1 or AS2 genes under the control of the cauliflower mosaic virus (CAMV) 35S promoter. Although plants with as1 and as2 mutations have very similar phenotypes, 35S::AS1/Ler and 35S::AS2/Ler transgenic plants showed dramatically different morphologies. A possible model of the AS1, AS2 and ER action in leaf polarity formation is discussed.     

MCL-1 regulates the balance between autophagy and apoptosis

BCL-2 homologues lie at the interface between apoptosis and autophagy, regulating these two critical cellular pathways. However, the mechanisms controlling their coordinate regulation and the consequences on cellular survival are not fully understood. We recently showed that MCL-1 is a critical regulator of autophagy in cell lines and neurons. Our findings indicate that activation of apoptosis and autophagy is controlled in a developmentally regulated manner. In addition, the fact that MCL-1 null neurons die in an autophagy-dependent manner suggests that while a basal level of autophagy is required for neuronal survival, its sustained activation may be detrimental. This could have major implications for the treatment of neurodegenerative diseases using strategies involving activation of autophagy to clear protein aggregates from the brain.     

MCL-1 regulates the balance between autophagy and apoptosis

BCL-2 homologues lie at the interface between apoptosis and autophagy, regulating these two critical cellular

pathways. However, the mechanisms controlling their coordinate regulation and the consequences on cellular

survival are not fully understood. We recently showed that MCL-1 is a critical regulator of autophagy in cell lines

and neurons. Our findings indicate that activation of apoptosis and autophagy is controlled in a developmentally

regulated manner. In addition, the fact that MCL-1 null neurons die in an autophagy-dependent manner suggests that while a basal level of autophagy is required for neuronal survival, its sustained activation may be detrimental. This could have major implications for the treatment of neurodegenerative diseases using strategies involving activation of autophagy to clear protein aggregates from the brain.     

Differential regulation of trichome formation on the adaxial and abaxial leaf surfaces by gibberellins and photoperiod in Arabidopsis thaliana (L.) Heynh.

In wild-type (WT) Columbia and Landsberg erecta ecotypes of Arabidopsis thaliana (L.) Heynh., trichomes are present on the adaxial surfaces of all rosette leaves but are absent from the abaxial surfaces of the first-formed leaves. We have determined that both long-day (LD) photoperiod and gibberellin (GA) stimulate trichome formation. WT plants grown in LD conditions produce the first abaxial trichome on earlier leaves than plants grown in short-day (SD) conditions. Photoperiod sensitivity of abaxial trichome formation on WT plants develops gradually over time, reaching the maximum sensitivity about 24 d after germination. Application of gibberellic acid to WT plants growing in SD conditions accelerates the onset of abaxial trichomes. Conversely, application of 20 to 80 mg L-1 paclobutrazol, a GA biosynthesis inhibitor, to wild-type plants suppresses trichome initiation on the abaxial epidermis. The GA-deficient mutants ga1-5 and ga4-1 and the GA-insensitive mutant gai-1 exhibit delayed onset of abaxial trichomes when grown in LD conditions. The null mutant ga1-3 produces completely glabrous leaves when grown in SD conditions. Application of gibberellic acid to glabrous ga1-3 plants consistently induces earlier formation of trichomes on the adaxial epidermis than on the abaxial epidermis, demonstrating a difference between the adaxial and abaxial surfaces in their response to GA with regard to trichome formation.     

Both the adaxial and abaxial epidermal layers of the rose petal emit volatile scent compounds

The localization and timing of production and emission of scent was studied in different Rosa × hybrida cultivars, focusing on three particular topics. First, it was found that petals represent the major source of scent in R. × hybrida. In heavily scented cultivars, the spectrum and levels of volatiles emitted by the flower broadly correlated with the spectrum and levels of volatiles contained within the petal, throughout petal development. Secondly, analysis of rose cultivars that lacked a detectable scent indicated that the absence of fragrance was due to a reduction in both the biosynthesis and emission of scent volatiles. A cytological study, conducted on scented and non-scented rose cultivars showed that no major difference was visible in the anatomy of the petals either at small magnification in optical sections or in ultrathin sections observed by TEM. In particular, the cuticle of epidermal cells was not thicker in scentless cultivars. Thirdly, using two different techniques, solid/liquid phase extraction and headspace collection of volatiles, we showed that in roses, both epidermal layers are capable of producing and emitting scent volatiles, despite the different morphologies of the cells of these two tissues. Moreover, OOMT, an enzyme involved in scent molecule biosynthesis was localized in both epidermal layers.     

Optical properties of the adaxial and abaxial faces of leaves. Chlorophyll fluorescence, absorption and scattering coefficients.

Emission fluorescence spectra were obtained for the adaxial and abaxial faces of dicotyledonous (Ficus benjamina L., Ficus elastica, Gardenia jasminoides and Hedera helix) and monocotyledonous leaves (Gladiolus spp. and Dracaena cincta bicolor). After correction by light-re-absorption processes, using a previously published physical model, the adaxial faces of dicotyledons showed a fluorescence ratio Fred/Ffar-red rather lower than the respective values for the abaxial faces. Monocotyledons and shade-adapted-plants showed similar values for the corrected fluorescence ratio for both faces. Even when differences in experimental fluorescence emission from adaxial and abaxial leaves in dicotyledons are mostly due to light re-absorption processes, the residual dissimilarity found after application of the correction model would point to the fact that fluorescence re-absorption is not the only responsible for the observed disparity. It was concluded that light re-absorption processes does not account entirely for the differences in the experimental emission spectra between adaxial and abaxial leaves. Differences that remains still present after correction might be interpreted in terms of a different photosystem ratio (PSII/PSI). Experiments at low temperature sustained this hypothesis. In dicotyledons, light reflectance for adaxial leaves was found to be lower than for the abaxial ones. It was mainly due to an increase in the scattering coefficient for the lower leaf-side. The absorption coefficient values were slightly higher for the upper leaf-side. During senescence of Ficus benjamina leaves, the scattering coefficient increased for both the upper and lower leaf-sides. With senescence time the absorption coefficient spectra broadened while the corrected fluorescence ratio (Fred/Ffar-red) decreased for both faces. The results pointed to a preferential destruction of photosystem II relative to photosystem I during senescence.     

Distinct light responses of the adaxial and abaxial stomata in intact leaves of Helianthus annuus L

Using a laboratory-constructed system that can measure the gas exchange rates of two leaf surfaces separately, the light responses of the adaxial and abaxial stomata in intact leaves of sunflower ( Helianthus annuus L.) were investigated, keeping the intercellular CO₂ concentration ( C _i) at 300  µ L L⁻¹. When evenly illuminating both sides of the leaf, the stomatal conductance ( g _s) of the abaxial surface was higher than that of the adaxial surface at any light intensity. When each surface of the leaf was illuminated separately, both the adaxial and abaxial stomata were more sensitive to the light transmitted through the leaf (self-transmitted light) than to direct illumination. Relationships between the whole leaf photosynthetic rate ( A _n) and the g _s for each side highlighted a strong dependence of stomatal opening on mesophyll photosynthesis. Light transmitted through another leaf was more effective than the direct white light for the abaxial stomata, but not for the adaxial stomata. Moreover, green monochromatic light induced an opening of the abaxial stomata, but not of the adaxial stomata. As the proportion of blue light in the transmitted light is less than that in the white light, there may be some uncharacterized light responses, which are responsible for the opening of the abaxial stomata by the transmitted, green light.     

Difference in light-induced increase in ploidy level and cell size between adaxial and abaxial epidermal pavement cells of Phaseolus vulgaris primary leaves

Changes in nuclear DNA content and cell size of adaxial andabaxial epidermal pavement cells were investigated using brightlight-induced leaf expansion of Phaseolus vulgaris plants. Inprimary leaves of bean plants grown under high (sunlight) ormoderate (ML; photon flux density, 163 µmol m^–2s^–1) light, most adaxial epidermal pavement cells hada nucleus with the 4C amount of DNA, whereas most abaxial pavementcells had a 2C nucleus. In contrast, plants grown under lowintensity white light (LL; 15 µmol m^–2 s^–1)for 13 d, when cell proliferation of epidermal pavement cellshad already finished, had a 2C nuclear DNA content in most adaxialpavement cells. When these LL-grown plants were transferredto ML, the increase in irradiance raised the frequency of 4Cnuclei in adaxial but not in abaxial pavement cells within 4d. On the other hand, the size of abaxial pavement cells increasedby 53% within 4 d of transfer to ML and remained unchanged thereafter,whereas adaxial pavement cells continuously enlarged for 12d. This suggests that the increase in adaxial cell size after4 d is supported by the nuclear DNA doubling. The differentresponses between adaxial and abaxial epidermal cells were notinduced by the different light intensity at both surfaces. Itwas shown that adaxial epidermal cells have a different propertythan abaxial ones. Key words: Cell enlargement, endopolyploidization, epidermal pavement cells, incident light intensity, leaf expansion, nuclear DNA content, Phaseolus vulgaris     

DRL1 regulates adaxial leaf patterning and shoot apical meristem activity in<Emphasis Type="Italic">Arabidopsis</Emphasis>

Leaf shape is controlled early on by initiation at the shoot apical meristem (SAM), as well as by changes in the rates and planes of cell division and the polarity-dependent differentiation of leaf cells. To elucidate the regulation of this differentiation by signal(s) from the SAM, we screened for mutations in genes that might be involved in these early processes. A novel recessive mutant, 356-2 [identified as a new allele of thedeformed root and leaf1 (drl1) mutant], was isolated from a collection ofDs transposon insertion lines. The356- 2/drl1- 101 mutant produces narrow, filamentous leaves and defective mer-istems. Its palisade cells have a spongy cell-like structure and are fewer in number, indicating that the leaves are abaxialized. Interestingly, some of those filament-like leaves have no vascular tissues inside their blades.DRL1 encodes a protein similar to the yeast elongator-associated protein (EAP) KTI12. The amino acid sequence of DRL1 is universally conserved in prokaryotes and eukaryotes. These facts suggest that DRL1 might positively regulate leaf polarity and SAM activity by controlling cell proliferation and differentiation.     

LSD1 regulates the balance between self-renewal and differentiation in human embryonic stem cells

We identify LSD1 (lysine-specific demethylase 1; also known as KDM1A and AOF2) as a key histone modifier that participates in the maintenance of pluripotency through the regulation of bivalent domains, a chromatin environment present at the regulatory regions of developmental genes that contains both H3K4 di/trimethylation and H3K27 trimethylation marks. LSD1 occupies the promoters of a subset of developmental genes that contain bivalent domains and are co-occupied by OCT4 and NANOG in human embryonic stem cells, where it controls the levels of H3K4 methylation through its demethylase activity. Thus, LSD1 has a role in maintaining the silencing of several developmental genes in human embryonic stem cells by regulating the critical balance between H3K4 and H3K27 methylation at their regulatory regions.     

Cooperative signaling between Slit2 and Ephrin-A1 regulates a balance between angiogenesis and angiostasis

Slit proteins induce cytoskeletal remodeling through interaction with roundabout (Robo) receptors, regulating migration of neurons and nonneuronal cells, including leukocytes, tumor cells, and endothelium. The role of Slit2 in vascular remodeling, however, remains controversial, with reports of both pro- and antiangiogenic activity. We report here that cooperation between Slit2 and ephrin-A1 regulates a balance between the pro- and antiangiogenic functions of Slit2. While Slit2 promotes angiogenesis in culture and in vivo as a single agent, Slit2 potently inhibits angiogenic remodeling in the presence of ephrin-A1. Slit2 stimulates angiogenesis through mTORC2-dependent activation of Akt and Rac GTPase, the activities of which are inhibited in the presence of ephrin-A1. Activated Rac or Akt partially rescues vascular assembly and motility in costimulated endothelium. Taken together, these data suggest that Slit2 differentially regulates angiogenesis in the context of ephrin-A1, providing a plausible mechanism for the pro- versus antiangiogenic functions of Slit2. Our results suggest that the complex roles of Slit-Robo signaling in angiogenesis involve context-dependent mechanisms.     

The ability of abaxial and adaxial epidermis of sun and shade leaves to attenuate UV-A and UV-B radiation in relation to the UV absorbing capacity of the whole leaf methanolic extracts

The UV‐absorbing capacity (measured as A₃₁₀ cm^?2 and A₃₆₅ cm^?2 or A_UVR cm^?2) of the shade leaves of four representative evergreen sclerophylls of the Mediterranean region (Quercus coccifera, Q. ilex, Arbutus andrachne and A. unedo) was considerably lower than the corresponding one of sun leaves of the same species. However, fibre optic microprobe measurements showed that adaxial as well as abaxial epidermis of shade leaves of all examined plants, except abaxial epidermis of A. andrachne, were almost as effective as the corresponding ones of the sun leaves in screening out most of the incident UV‐B radiation. There is probably a threshold, under which the concentration of the UV‐B absorbing compounds in the protective tissues is not furthermore reduced, in spite of the low levels of the stress factor (UV‐B radiation) in the environment. On the other hand, the ability of both abaxial and adaxial epidermis to attenuate UV‐A radiation, except of adaxial leaf epidermis of Quercus species, depended on the UV absorbing capacity of the whole‐leaf extracts, with different correlation patterns between the two Quercus species and the two Arbutus species. This could be explained by the fact that shade leaves showed not only quantitative, but also qualitative differences (higher A₃₁₀/A₃₆₅ ratio) in the absorbance of their methanolic extracts compared to these of sun leaves. The results of the present study showed that we should not always correlate the depth of penetration of UV radiation into sun and shade leaves according to the corresponding UV absorbing capacity of the whole leaf methanolic extracts, without taking into account all the anatomical, developmental and biochemical (such as different composition and distribution of the UV‐absorbing compounds among the different protective tissues) peculiarities of the leaves of each species.