Domain-domain communication for tRNA aminoacylation: the importance of covalent connectivity

Aminoacyl-tRNA synthetases form complexes with tRNA to catalyze transfer of activated amino acids to the 3' end of tRNA. The tRNA synthetase complexes are roughly divided into the activation and tRNA-binding domains of synthetases, which interact with the acceptor and anticodon ends of tRNAs, respectively. Efficient aminoacylation of tRNA by Escherichia coli cysteinyl-tRNA synthetase (CysRS) requires both domains, although the pathways for the long-range domain-domain communication are not well understood. Previous studies show that dissection of tRNA(Cys) into acceptor and anticodon helices seriously reduces the efficiency of aminoacylation, suggesting that communication requires covalent continuity of the tRNA backbone. Here we tested if communication requires the continuity of the synthetase backbone. Two N-terminal fragments and one C-terminal fragment of E. coli CysRS were generated. While the N-terminal fragments were active in adenylate synthesis, they were severely defective in the catalytic efficiency and specificity of tRNA aminoacylation. Conversely, although the C-terminal fragment was not catalytically active, it was able to bind and discriminate tRNA. However, addition of the C-terminal fragment to an N-terminal fragment in trans did not improve the aminoacylation efficiency of the N-terminal fragment to the level of the full-length enzyme. These results emphasize the importance of covalent continuity of both CysRS and tRNA(Cys) for efficient tRNA aminoacylation, and highlight the energetic costs of constraining the tRNA synthetase complex for domain-domain communication. Importantly, this study also provides new insights into the existence of several natural "split" synthetases that are now identified from genomic sequencing projects.     

Shape-selective RNA recognition by cysteinyl-tRNA synthetase

The crystal structure of Escherichia coli cysteinyl-tRNA synthetase (CysRS) bound to tRNA(Cys) at a resolution of 2.3 A reveals base-specific and shape-selective interactions across an extensive protein-RNA recognition interface. The complex contains a mixed alpha/beta C-terminal domain, which is disordered in the unliganded enzyme. This domain makes specific hydrogen bonding interactions with all three bases of the GCA anticodon. The tRNA anticodon stem is bent sharply toward the enzyme as compared with its conformation when bound to elongation factor Tu, providing an essential basis for shape-selective recognition. The CysRS structure also reveals interactions of conserved enzyme groups with the sugar-phosphate backbone in the D loop, adjacent to an unusual G15.G48 tertiary base pair previously implicated in tRNA aminoacylation. A combined mutational analysis of enzyme and tRNA groups at G15.G48 supports the notion that contacts between CysRS and the sugar-phosphate backbone contribute to recognition by indirect readout.     

Unilateral aminoacylation specificity between bovine mitochondria and eubacteria

The present study shows unilateral aminoacylation specificity between bovine mitochondria and eubacteria (Escherichia coli and Thermus thermophilus) in five amino acid-specific aminoacylation systems. Mitochondrial synthetases were capable of charging eubacterial tRNA as well as mitochondrial tRNA, whereas eubacterial synthetases did not efficiently charge mitochondrial tRNA. Mitochondrial phenylalanyl-, threonyl-, arginyl-, and lysyl-tRNA synthetases were shown to charge and discriminate cognate E. coli tRNA species from noncognate ones strictly, as did the corresponding E. coli synthetases. By contrast, mitochondrial seryl-tRNA synthetase not only charged cognate E. coli serine tRNA species but also extensively misacylated noncognate E. coli tRNA species. These results suggest a certain conservation of tRNA recognition mechanisms between the mitochondrial and E. coli aminoacyl-tRNA synthetases in that anticodon sequences are most likely to be recognized by the former four synthetases, but not sufficiently by the seryl-tRNA synthetase. The unilaterality in aminoacylation may imply that tRNA recognition mechanisms of the mitochondrial synthetases have evolved to be, to some extent, simpler than their eubacterial counterparts in response to simplifications in the species-number and the structural elements of animal mitochondrial tRNAs.     

Adaptation to tRNA acceptor stem structure by flexible adjustment in the catalytic domain of class I tRNA synthetases

Class I aminoacyl-tRNA synthetases (aaRSs) use a Rossmann-fold domain to catalyze the synthesis of aminoacyl-tRNAs required for decoding genetic information. While the Rossmann-fold domain is conserved in evolution, the acceptor stem near the aminoacylation site varies among tRNA substrates, raising the question of how the conserved protein fold adapts to RNA sequence variations. Of interest is the existence of an unpaired C-A mismatch at the 1-72 position unique to bacterial initiator tRNA(fMet) and absent from elongator tRNAs. Here we show that the class I methionyl-tRNA synthetase (MetRS) of Escherichia coli and its close structural homolog cysteinyl-tRNA synthetase (CysRS) display distinct patterns of recognition of the 1-72 base pair. While the structural homology of the two enzymes in the Rossmann-fold domain is manifested in a common burst feature of aminoacylation kinetics, CysRS discriminates against unpaired 1-72, whereas MetRS lacks such discrimination. A structure-based alignment of the Rossmann fold identifies the insertion of an α-helical motif, specific to CysRS but absent from MetRS, which docks on 1-72 and may discriminate against mismatches. Indeed, substitutions of the CysRS helical motif abolish the discrimination against unpaired 1-72. Additional structural alignments reveal that with the exception of MetRS, class I tRNA synthetases contain a structural motif that docks on 1-72. This work demonstrates that by flexible insertion of a structural motif to dock on 1-72, the catalytic domain of class I tRNA synthetases can acquire structural plasticity to adapt to changes at the end of the tRNA acceptor stem.     

Recognition of tRNA backbone for aminoacylation with cysteine: evolution from Escherichia coli to human

The underlying basis of the genetic code is specific aminoacylation of tRNAs by aminoacyl-tRNA synthetases. Although the code is conserved, bases in tRNA that establish aminoacylation are not necessarily conserved. Even when the bases are conserved, positions of backbone groups that contribute to aminoacylation may vary. We show here that, although the Escherichia coli and human cysteinyl-tRNA synthetases both recognize the same bases (U73 and the GCA anticodon) of tRNA for aminoacylation, they have different emphasis on the tRNA backbone. The E. coli enzyme recognizes two clusters of phosphate groups. One is at A36 in the anticodon and the other is in the core of the tRNA structure and includes phosphate groups at positions 9, 12, 14, and 60. Metal-ion rescue experiments show that those at positions 9, 12, and 60 are involved with binding divalent metal ions that are important for aminoacylation. The E. coli enzyme also recognizes 2'-hydroxyl groups within the same two clusters: at positions 33, 35, and 36 in the anticodon loop, and at positions 49, 55, and 61 in the core. The human enzyme, by contrast, recognizes few phosphate or 2'-hydroxy groups for aminoacylation. The evolution from the backbone-dependent recognition by the E. coli enzyme to the backbone-independent recognition by the human enzyme demonstrates a previously unrecognized shift that nonetheless has preserved the specificity for aminoacylation with cysteine.     

Single sequence of a helix-loop peptide confers functional anticodon recognition on two tRNA synthetases.

The specific aminoacylation of RNA oligonucleotides whose sequences are based on the acceptor stems of tRNAs can be viewed as an operational RNA code for amino acids that may be related to the development of the genetic code. Many synthetases also have direct interactions with tRNA anticodon triplets and, in some cases, these interactions are thought to be essential for aminoacylation specificity. In these instances, an unresolved question is whether interactions with parts of the tRNA outside of the anticodon are sufficient for decoding genetic information. Escherichia coli isoleucyl- and methionyl-tRNA synthetases are closely related enzymes that interact with their respective anticodons. We used binary combinatorial mutagenesis of a 10 amino acid anticodon binding peptide in these two enzymes to identify composite sequences that would confer function to both enzymes despite their recognizing different anticodons. A single peptide was found that confers function to both enzymes in vivo and in vitro. Thus, even in enzymes where anticodon interactions are normally important for distinguishing one tRNA from another, these interactions can be 'neutralized' without losing specificity of amino-acylation. We suggest that acceptor helix interactions may play a role in providing the needed specificity.     

RNA minihelices and the decoding of genetic information

The rules of the genetic code are determined by the specific aminoacylation of transfer RNAs by aminoacyl transfer RNA synthetase. A straightforward analysis shows that a system of synthetase-tRNA interactions that relies on anticodons for specificity could, in principle, enable most synthetases to distinguish their cognate tRNA isoacceptors from all others. Although the anticodons of some tRNAs are recognition sites for the cognate aminoacyl tRNA synthetases, for other synthetases the anticodon is dispensable for specific aminoacylation. In particular, alanine and histidine tRNA synthetases aminoacylate small RNA minihelices that reconstruct the part of their cognate tRNAs that is proximate to the amino acid attachment site. Helices with as few as six base pairs can be efficiently aminoacylated. The specificity of aminoacylation is determined by a few nucleotides and can be converted from one amino acid to another by the change of only a few nucleotides. These findings suggest that, for a subgroup of the synthetases, there is a distinct code in the acceptor helix of transfer RNAs that determines aminoacylation specificity.     

Redundant synthesis of cysteinyl-tRNACys in Methanosarcina mazei

A subset of methanogenic archaea synthesize the cysteinyl-tRNA(Cys) (Cys-tRNA(Cys)) needed for protein synthesis using both a canonical cysteinyl-tRNA synthetase (CysRS) as well as a set of two enzymes that operate via a separate indirect pathway. In the indirect route, phosphoseryl-tRNA(Cys) (Sep-tRNA(Cys)) is first synthesized by phosphoseryl-tRNA synthetase (SepRS), and this misacylated intermediate is then converted to Cys-tRNA(Cys) by Sep-tRNA:Cys-tRNA synthase (SepCysS) via a pyridoxal phosphate-dependent mechanism. Here, we explore the function of all three enzymes in the mesophilic methanogen Methanosarcina mazei. The genome of M. mazei also features three distinct tRNA(Cys) isoacceptors, further indicating the unusual and complex nature of Cys-tRNA(Cys) synthesis in this organism. Comparative aminoacylation kinetics by M. mazei CysRS and SepRS reveals that each enzyme prefers a distinct tRNA(Cys) isoacceptor or pair of isoacceptors. Recognition determinants distinguishing the tRNAs are shown to reside in the globular core of the molecule. Both enzymes also require the S-adenosylmethione-dependent formation of (m1)G37 in the anticodon loop for efficient aminoacylation. We further report a new, highly sensitive assay to measure the activity of SepCysS under anaerobic conditions. With this approach, we demonstrate that SepCysS functions as a multiple-turnover catalyst with kinetic behavior similar to bacterial selenocysteine synthase and the archaeal/eukaryotic SepSecS enzyme. Together, these data suggest that both metabolic routes and all three tRNA(Cys) species in M. mazei play important roles in the cellular physiology of the organism.     

Control of Catalytic Cycle by a Pair of Analogous tRNA Modification Enzymes

Enzymes that use distinct active site structures to perform identical reactions are known as analogous enzymes. The isolation of analogous enzymes suggests the existence of multiple enzyme structural pathways that can catalyze the same chemical reaction. A fundamental question concerning analogous enzymes is whether their distinct active-site structures would confer the same or different kinetic constraints to the chemical reaction, particularly with respect to the control of enzyme turnover. Here, we address this question with the analogous enzymes of bacterial TrmD and its eukaryotic and archaeal counterpart Trm5. TrmD and Trm5 catalyze methyl transfer to synthesize the m1G37 base at the 3′ position adjacent to the tRNA anticodon, using S-adenosyl methionine (AdoMet) as the methyl donor. TrmD features a trefoil-knot active-site structure whereas Trm5 features the Rossmann fold. Pre-steady-state analysis revealed that product synthesis by TrmD proceeds linearly with time, whereas that by Trm5 exhibits a rapid burst followed by a slower and linear increase with time. The burst kinetics of Trm5 suggests that product release is the rate-limiting step of the catalytic cycle, consistent with the observation of higher enzyme affinity to the products of tRNA and AdoMet. In contrast, the lack of burst kinetics of TrmD suggests that its turnover is controlled by a step required for product synthesis. Although TrmD exists as a homodimer, it showed half-of-the-sites reactivity for tRNA binding and product synthesis. The kinetic differences between TrmD and Trm5 are parallel with those between the two classes of aminoacyl-tRNA synthetases, which use distinct active site structures to catalyze tRNA aminoacylation. This parallel suggests that the findings have a fundamental importance for enzymes that catalyze both methyl and aminoacyl transfer to tRNA in the decoding process.     

Anticodon recognition in evolution: switching tRNA specificity of an aminoacyl-tRNA synthetase by site-directed peptide transplantation

The highly conserved aspartyl-, asparaginyl-, and lysyl-tRNA synthetases compose one subclass of aminoacyl-tRNA synthetases, called IIb. The three enzymes possess an OB-folded extension at their N terminus. The function of this extension is to specifically recognize the anticodon triplet of the tRNA. Three-dimensional models of bacterial aspartyl- and lysyl-tRNA synthetases complexed to tRNA indicate that a rigid scaffold of amino acid residues along the five beta-strands of the OB-fold accommodates the base U at the center of the anticodon. The binding of the adjacent anticodon bases occurs through interactions with a flexible loop joining strands 4 and 5 (L45). As a result, a switching of the specificity of lysyl-tRNA synthetase from tRNALys (anticodon UUU) toward tRNAAsp (GUC) could be attempted by transplanting the small loop L45 of aspartyl-tRNA synthetase inside lysyl-tRNA synthetase. Upon this transplantation, lysyl-tRNA synthetase loses its capacity to aminoacylate tRNALys. In exchange, the chimeric enzyme acquires the capacity to charge tRNAAsp with lysine. Upon giving the tRNAAsp substrate the discriminator base of tRNALys, the specificity shift is improved. The change of specificity was also established in vivo. Indeed, the transplanted lysyl-tRNA synthetase succeeds in suppressing a missense Lys --> Asp mutation inserted into the beta-lactamase gene. These results functionally establish that sequence variation in a small peptide region of subclass IIb aminoacyl-tRNA synthetases contributes to specification of nucleic acid recognition. Because this peptide element is not part of the core catalytic structure, it may have evolved independently of the active sites of these synthetases.     

Major anticodon-binding region missing from an archaebacterial tRNA synthetase

The small size of the archaebacterial Methanococcus jannaschii tyrosyl-tRNA synthetase may give insights into the historical development of tRNAs and tRNA synthetases. The L-shaped tRNA has two major arms-the acceptor.TpsiC minihelix with the amino acid attachment site and the anticodon-containing arm. The structural organization of the tRNA synthetases parallels that of tRNAs. The more ancient synthetase domain contains the active site and insertions that interact with the minihelix portion of the tRNA. A second, presumably more recent, domain interacts with the anticodon-containing section of tRNA. The small size of the M. jannaschii enzyme is due to the absence of most of the second domain, including a segment thought to bind to the anticodon. Consistent with the absence of an anticodon-binding motif, a mutation of the central base of the anticodon had a relatively small effect on the aminoacylation efficiency of the M. jannaschii enzyme. In contrast, others showed earlier that the same mutation severely reduced charging by a normal-sized bacterial enzyme that has the aforementioned anticodon-binding motif. However, the M. jannaschii enzyme has a peptide insertion into its catalytic domain. This insertion is shared with all other tyrosyl-tRNA synthetases and is needed for a critical minihelix interaction. We show that the M. jannaschii enzyme is active on minihelix substrates over a wide temperature range and has preserved the same peptide-dependent minihelix specificity seen in other tyrosine enzymes. These findings are consistent with the concept that anticodon interactions of tRNA synthetases were later adaptations to the emerging synthetase-tRNA complex that was originally framed around the minihelix.     

The free yeast aspartyl-tRNA synthetase differs from the tRNA(Asp)-complexed enzyme by structural changes in the catalytic site, hinge region, and anticodon-binding domain

Aminoacyl-tRNA synthetases catalyze the specific charging of amino acid residues on tRNAs. Accurate recognition of a tRNA by its synthetase is achieved through sequence and structural signalling. It has been shown that tRNAs undergo large conformational changes upon binding to enzymes, but little is known about the conformational rearrangements in tRNA-bound synthetases. To address this issue the crystal structure of the dimeric class II aspartyl-tRNA synthetase (AspRS) from yeast was solved in its free form and compared to that of the protein associated to the cognate tRNA(Asp). The use of an enzyme truncated in N terminus improved the crystal quality and allowed us to solve and refine the structure of free AspRS at 2.3 A resolution. For the first time, snapshots are available for the different macromolecular states belonging to the same tRNA aminoacylation system, comprising the free forms for tRNA and enzyme, and their complex. Overall, the synthetase is less affected by the association than the tRNA, although significant local changes occur. They concern a rotation of the anticodon binding domain and a movement in the hinge region which connects the anticodon binding and active-site domains in the AspRS subunit. The most dramatic differences are observed in two evolutionary conserved loops. Both are in the neighborhood of the catalytic site and are of importance for ligand binding. The combination of this structural analysis with mutagenesis and enzymology data points to a tRNA binding process that starts by a recognition event between the tRNA anticodon loop and the synthetase anticodon binding module.     

Importance of the anticodon sequence in the aminoacylation of tRNAs by methionyl-tRNA synthetase and by valyl-tRNA synthetase in an Archaebacterium

The mode of recognition of tRNAs by aminoacyl-tRNA synthetases and translation factors is largely unknown in archaebacteria. To study this process, we have cloned the wild type initiator tRNA gene from the moderate halophilic archaebacterium Haloferax volcanii and mutants derived from it into a plasmid capable of expressing the tRNA in these cells. Analysis of tRNAs in vivo show that the initiator tRNA is aminoacylated but is not formylated in H. volcanii. This result provides direct support for the notion that protein synthesis in archaebacteria is initiated with methionine and not with formylmethionine. We have analyzed the effect of two different mutations (CAU-->CUA and CAU-->GAC) in the anticodon sequence of the initiator tRNA on its recognition by the aminoacyl-tRNA synthetases in vivo. The CAU-->CUA mutant was not aminoacylated to any significant extent in vivo, suggesting the importance of the anticodon in aminoacylation of tRNA by methionyl-tRNA synthetase. This mutant initiator tRNA can, however, be aminoacylated in vitro by the Escherichia coli glutaminyl-tRNA synthetase, suggesting that the lack of aminoacylation is due to the absence in H. volcanii of a synthetase, which recognizes the mutant tRNA. Archaebacteria lack glutaminyl-tRNA synthetase and utilize a two-step pathway involving glutamyl-tRNA synthetase and glutamine amidotransferase to generate glutaminyl-tRNA. The lack of aminoacylation of the mutant tRNA indicates that this mutant tRNA is not a substrate for the H. volcanii glutamyl-tRNA synthetase. The CAU-->GAC anticodon mutant is most likely aminoacylated with valine in vivo. Thus, the anticodon plays an important role in the recognition of tRNA by at least two of the halobacterial aminoacyl-tRNA synthetases.     

Influence of transfer RNA tertiary structure on aminoacylation efficiency by glutaminyl and cysteinyl-tRNA synthetases

The position of the tertiary Levitt pair between nucleotides 15 and 48 in the transfer RNA core region suggests a key role in stabilizing the joining of the two helical domains, and in maintaining the relative orientations of the D and variable loops. E. coli tRNA(Gln) possesses the canonical Pu15-Py48 trans pairing at this position (G15-C48), while the tRNA(Cys) species from this organism instead features an unusual G15-G48 pair. To explore the structural context dependence of a G15-G48 Levitt pair, a number of tRNA(Gln) species containing G15-G48 were constructed and evaluated as substrates for glutaminyl and cysteinyl-tRNA synthetases. The glutaminylation efficiencies of these mutant tRNAs are reduced by two to tenfold compared with native tRNA(Gln), consistent with previous findings that the tertiary core of this tRNA plays a role in GlnRS recognition. Introduction of tRNA(Cys) identity nucleotides at the acceptor and anticodon ends of tRNA(Gln) produced a tRNA substrate which was efficiently aminoacylated by CysRS, even though the tertiary core region of this species contains the tRNA(Gln) G15-C48 pair. Surprisingly, introduction of G15-G48 into the non-cognate tRNA(Gln) tertiary core then significantly impairs CysRS recognition. By contrast, previous work has shown that CysRS aminoacylates tRNA(Cys) core regions containing G15-G48 with much better efficiency than those with G15-C48. Therefore, tertiary nucleotides surrounding the Levitt pair must significantly modulate the efficiency of aminoacylation by CysRS. To explore the detailed nature of the structural interdependence, crystal structures of two tRNA(Gln) mutants containing G15-G48 were determined bound to GlnRS. These structures show that the larger purine ring of G48 is accommodated by rotation into the syn position, with the N7 nitrogen serving as hydrogen bond acceptor from several groups of G15. The G15-G48 conformations differ significantly compared to that observed in the native tRNA(Cys) structure bound to EF-Tu, further implicating an important role for surrounding nucleotides in maintaining the integrity of the tertiary core and its consequent ability to present crucial recognition determinants to aminoacyl-tRNA synthetases.     

tRNA discrimination by T. thermophilus phenylalanyl-tRNA synthetase at the binding step

The extent of tRNA recognition at the level of binding by Thermus thermophilus phenylalanyl-tRNA synthetase (PheRS), one of the most complex class II synthetases, has been studied by independent measurements of the enzyme association with wild-type and mutant tRNA(Phe)s as well as with non-cognate tRNAs. The data obtained, combined with kinetic data on aminoacylation, clearly show that PheRS exhibits more tRNA selectivity at the level of binding than at the level of catalysis. The anticodon nucleotides involved in base-specific interactions with the enzyme prevail both in the initial binding recognition and in favouring aminoacylation catalysis. Tertiary nucleotides of base pair G19-C56 and base triple U45-G10-C25 contribute primarily to stabilization of the correctly folded tRNA(Phe) structure, which is important for binding. Other nucleotides of the central core (U20, U16 and of the A26-G44 tertiary base pair) are involved in conformational adjustment of the tRNA upon its interaction with the enzyme. The specificity of nucleotide A73, mutation of which slightly reduces the catalytic rate of aminoacylation, is not displayed at the binding step. A few backbone-mediated contacts of PheRS with the acceptor and anticodon stems revealed in the crystal structure do not contribute to tRNA(Phe) discrimination, their role being limited to stabilization of the complex. The highest affinity of T. thermophilus PheRS for cognate tRNA, observed for synthetase-tRNA complexes, results in 100-3000-fold binding discrimination against non-cognate tRNAs.     

Structure of human tryptophanyl-tRNA synthetase in complex with tRNATrp reveals the molecular basis of tRNA recognition and specificity

Aminoacyl-tRNA synthetases (aaRSs) are a family of enzymes responsible for the covalent link of amino acids to their cognate tRNAs. The selectivity and species-specificity in the recognitions of both amino acid and tRNA by aaRSs play a vital role in maintaining the fidelity of protein synthesis. We report here the first crystal structure of human tryptophanyl-tRNA synthetase (hTrpRS) in complex with tRNA^Trp and Trp which, together with biochemical data, reveals the molecular basis of a novel tRNA binding and recognition mechanism. hTrpRS recognizes the tRNA acceptor arm from the major groove; however, the 3′ end CCA of the tRNA makes a sharp turn to bind at the active site with a deformed conformation. The discriminator base A73 is specifically recognized by an α-helix of the unique N-terminal domain and the anticodon loop by an α-helix insertion of the C-terminal domain. The N-terminal domain appears to be involved in Trp activation, but not essential for tRNA binding and acylation. Structural and sequence comparisons suggest that this novel tRNA binding and recognition mechanism is very likely shared by other archaeal and eukaryotic TrpRSs, but not by bacterial TrpRSs. Our findings provide insights into the molecular basis of tRNA specificity and species-specificity.     

Anticodon recognition and discrimination by the alpha-helix cage domain of class I lysyl-tRNA synthetase

Aminoacyl-tRNA synthetases are normally found in one of two mutually exclusive structural classes, the only known exception being lysyl-tRNA synthetase which exists in both classes I (LysRS1) and II (LysRS2). Differences in tRNA acceptor stem recognition between LysRS1 and LysRS2 do not drastically impact cellular aminoacylation levels, focusing attention on the mechanism of tRNA anticodon recognition by LysRS1. On the basis of structure-based sequence alignments, seven tRNALys anticodon variants and seven LysRS1 anticodon binding site variants were selected for analysis of the Pyrococcus horikoshii LysRS1-tRNALys docking model. LysRS1 specifically recognized the bases at positions 35 and 36, but not that at position 34. Aromatic residues form stacking interactions with U34 and U35, and aminoacylation kinetics also identified direct interactions between Arg502 and both U35 and U36. Tyr491 was also found to interact with U36, and the Y491E variant exhibited significant improvement compared to the wild type in aminoacylation of a tRNALysUUG mutant. Refinement of the LysRS1-tRNALys docking model based upon these data suggested that anticodon recognition by LysRS1 relies on considerably fewer interactions than that by LysRS2, providing a structural basis for the more significant role of the anticodon in tRNA recognition by the class II enzyme. To date, only glutamyl-tRNA synthetase (GluRS) has been found to contain an alpha-helix cage anticodon binding domain homologous to that of LysRS1, and these data now suggest that specificity for the anticodon of tRNALys could have been acquired through relatively few changes to the corresponding domain of an ancestral GluRS enzyme.