Solution structures of 2 : 1 and 1 : 1 DNA polymerase-DNA complexes probed by ultracentrifugation and small-angle X-ray scattering

We report small-angle X-ray scattering (SAXS) and sedimentation velocity (SV) studies on the enzyme–DNA complexes of rat DNA polymerase β (Pol β) and African swine fever virus DNA polymerase X (ASFV Pol X) with one-nucleotide gapped DNA. The results indicated formation of a 2 : 1 Pol β–DNA complex, whereas only 1 : 1 Pol X–DNA complex was observed. Three-dimensional structural models for the 2 : 1 Pol β–DNA and 1 : 1 Pol X–DNA complexes were generated from the SAXS experimental data to correlate with the functions of the DNA polymerases. The former indicates interactions of the 8 kDa 5′-dRP lyase domain of the second Pol β molecule with the active site of the 1 : 1 Pol β–DNA complex, while the latter demonstrates how ASFV Pol X binds DNA in the absence of DNA-binding motif(s). As ASFV Pol X has no 5′-dRP lyase domain, it is reasonable not to form a 2 : 1 complex. Based on the enhanced activities of the 2 : 1 complex and the observation that the 8 kDa domain is not in an optimal configuration for the 5′-dRP lyase reaction in the crystal structures of the closed ternary enzyme–DNA–dNTP complexes, we propose that the asymmetric 2 : 1 Pol β–DNA complex enhances the function of Pol β.     

Reconstitution of the base excision repair pathway for 7,8-dihydro-8-oxoguanine with purified human proteins

In mammalian cells, repair of the most abundant endogenous premutagenic lesion in DNA, 7,8-dihydro-8-oxoguanine (8-oxoG), is initiated by the bifunctional DNA glycosylase OGG1. By using purified human proteins, we have reconstituted repair of 8-oxoG lesions in DNA in vitro on a plasmid DNA substrate containing a single 8-oxoG residue. It is shown that efficient and complete repair requires only hOGG1, the AP endonuclease HAP1, DNA polymerase (Pol) β and DNA ligase I. After glycosylase base removal, repair occurred through the AP lyase step of hOGG1 followed by removal of the 3′-terminal sugar phosphate by the 3′-diesterase activity of HAP1. Addition of PCNA had a slight stimulatory effect on repair. Fen1 or high concentrations of Pol β were required to induce strand displacement DNA synthesis at incised 8-oxoG in the absence of DNA ligase. Fen1 induced Pol β strand displacement DNA synthesis at HAP1-cleaved AP sites differently from that at gaps introduced by hOGG1/HAP1 at 8-oxoG sites. In the presence of DNA ligase I, the repair reaction at 8-oxoG was confined to 1 nt replacement, even in the presence of high levels of Pol β and Fen1. Thus, the assembly of all the core proteins for 8-oxoG repair catalyses one major pathway that involves single nucleotide repair patches.     

The Transition of Closely Opposed Lesions to Double-Strand Breaks during Long-Patch Base Excision Repair Is Prevented by the Coordinated Action of DNA Polymerase δ and Rad27/Fen1

DNA double-strand breaks can result from closely opposed breaks induced directly in complementary strands. Alternatively, double-strand breaks could be generated during repair of clustered damage, where the repair of closely opposed lesions has to be well coordinated. Using single and multiple mutants of Saccharomyces cerevisiae (budding yeast) that impede the interaction of DNA polymerase δ and the 5′-flap endonuclease Rad27/Fen1 with the PCNA sliding clamp, we show that the lack of coordination between these components during long-patch base excision repair of alkylation damage can result in many double-strand breaks within the chromosomes of nondividing haploid cells. This contrasts with the efficient repair of nonclustered methyl methanesulfonate-induced lesions, as measured by quantitative PCR and S1 nuclease cleavage of single-strand break sites. We conclude that closely opposed single-strand lesions are a unique threat to the genome and that repair of closely opposed strand damage requires greater spatial and temporal coordination between the participating proteins than does widely spaced damage in order to prevent the development of double-strand breaks.Endogenous metabolism or environmental factors such as oxidizing and alkylating agents can produce a wide variety of lesions in DNA. The genomes of mammalian cells experience from 10,000 to as many as 200,000 modifications per day (37, 44). Most lesions are repaired by a complex network of proteins that are part of an elaborate, multistep base excision repair (BER) system that generates single-strand break (SSB) intermediates. Importantly, defects in BER can lead to malignancies and can be associated with age-associated disease, especially neurodegeneration (60).BER is initiated by specific DNA N-glycosylases that remove damaged bases, yielding apurinic/apyrimidinic (AP) sites. Subsequent incision by AP endonucleases results in SSBs, and excision results in a single base gap as a repair intermediate (33, 53). SSBs are expected to be frequent in the genome due to the abundance of base damage as well as intermediates of repair, recombination, replication, and other DNA transactions (15, 16). Because they are generally repaired efficiently by BER and SSB repair enzymes (16, 57), SSBs per se may not be a major source of genome instability. However, if lesions are clustered, the formation of two closely spaced SSBs on opposing strands (or a single SSB and a modified nucleotide or AP site) might pose a special risk in terms of the potential to generate mutations or the possibility of conversion to double-strand breaks (DSBs), which are potent genotoxic lesions. Clustered lesions can arise within cells by chance association of random DNA lesions in a small region or the induction of multiple events in a narrow region, as found for ionizing radiation and various chemicals, such as those used in cancer treatments (47, 58, 59). While efficient BER is important for genome integrity, the repair must be well coordinated to avoid the generation of closely opposed SSB intermediates at closely spaced lesions that could result in the secondary generation of DSBs, especially since cells have limited DSB repair capacity (<50 DSBs/cell in the case of Saccharomyces cerevisiae) (48). While the impact of clustered lesions on repair of DNA has been examined in vitro by use of purified enzymes or cell extracts (13, 14, 27, 39, 56), there has been little opportunity to address specifically the repair of clustered lesions, except for those arising from UV damage (49).Whether formed directly from sugar damage or as BER intermediates, SSBs formed during the repair of base damage often possess 5′-deoxyribose phosphate (5′-dRP) ends that are not suitable for rejoining by DNA ligases (9, 15). In humans, removal and repair of 5′-dRP are accomplished by different combinations of proteins (3, 15) that result in short-patch repair, involving replacement of a single nucleotide (nt), or long-patch repair, involving 2 to 10 nt. The budding yeast Saccharomyces cerevisiae lacks a DNA polymerase β that provides AP lyase activity required for short-patch repair in mammalian cells. Instead, removal and repair of a 5′-dRP rely on the long-patch pathway, involving the successive actions of DNA polymerase δ (Pol δ) for strand displacement, the Rad27/Fen1 endonuclease to remove 5′ flaps, and DNA ligase (Cdc9) to rejoin the resulting nicks (9). The sliding clamp protein PCNA, which interacts with all three players, has been proposed to play a central role in coordinating these processes (18, 19, 34). The coupling between the strand displacement reaction by Pol δ and the flap cutting reaction by Fen1 is highly efficient, with over 90% of the products released by Fen1 being mononucleotides (17).Although the coordination of Pol δ, PCNA, and Rad27/Fen1 provides efficient processing of individual lesions in DNA, closely opposed SSBs that arise during repair of base damage could manifest as DSBs, either directly or as a result of SSB processing. A DNA damaging agent that has been used frequently to characterize long- and short-patch BER is methyl methanesulfonate (MMS). Recently, we described the detection of closely opposed MMS-induced lesions in yeast (42). Since the closely opposed lesions might represent a special challenge to BER, we considered the possibility that they might specifically impact long-patch repair through Pol δ and/or coordination of events with Rad27/Fen1. Pol δ of S. cerevisiae is a heterotrimeric enzyme consisting of Pol3, Pol31, and Pol32 (23). The nonessential Pol32 subunit is involved in translesion DNA synthesis (TLS) (24, 30) and also break-induced replication (41). However, its role in other types of DNA repair remains unclear. Using our in vivo assay for specifically detecting closely spaced methylated DNA lesions (42) and SSBs, we examined the role of Pol32 as well as the cooperation between Pol δ, Rad27/Fen1, and PCNA in the repair of clustered DNA lesions induced by MMS in G₁ stationary-phase haploid yeast. We found that Pol32 plays an important role in ensuring that clustered lesions are efficiently repaired and do not transition to DSBs.     

Characterization of SpPol4, a unique X-family DNA polymerase in Schizosaccharomyces pombe

As predicted by the amino acid sequence, the purified protein coded by Schizosaccharomyces pombe SPAC2F7.06c is a DNA polymerase (SpPol4) whose biochemical properties resemble those of other X family (PolX) members. Thus, this new PolX is template-dependent, polymerizes in a distributive manner, lacks a detectable 3′→5′ proofreading activity and its preferred substrates are small gaps with a 5′-phosphate group. Similarly to Polμ, SpPol4 can incorporate a ribonucleotide (rNTP) into a primer DNA. However, it is not responsible for the 1–2 rNTPs proposed to be present at the mating-type locus and those necessary for mating-type switching. Unlike Polμ, SpPol4 lacks terminal deoxynucleotidyltransferase activity and realigns the primer terminus to alternative template bases only under certain sequence contexts and, therefore, it is less error-prone than Polμ. Nonetheless, the biochemical properties of this gap-filling DNA polymerase are suitable for a possible role of SpPol4 in non-homologous end-joining. Unexpectedly based on sequence analysis, SpPol4 has deoxyribose phosphate lyase activity like Polβ and Polλ, and unlike Polμ, suggesting also a role of this enzyme in base excision repair. Therefore, SpPol4 is a unique enzyme whose enzymatic properties are hybrid of those described for mammalian Polβ, Polλ and Polμ.     

DNA Polymerase α (swi7) and the Flap Endonuclease Fen1 (rad2) Act Together in the S-Phase Alkylation Damage Response in S. pombe

Polymerase α is an essential enzyme mainly mediating Okazaki fragment synthesis during lagging strand replication. A specific point mutation in Schizosaccharomyces pombe polymerase α named swi7-1, abolishes imprinting required for mating-type switching. Here we investigate whether this mutation confers any genome-wide defects. We show that the swi7-1 mutation renders cells hypersensitive to the DNA damaging agents methyl methansulfonate (MMS), hydroxyurea (HU) and UV and incapacitates activation of the intra-S checkpoint in response to DNA damage. In addition we show that, in the swi7-1 background, cells are characterized by an elevated level of repair foci and recombination, indicative of increased genetic instability. Furthermore, we detect novel Swi1-, -Swi3- and Pol α- dependent alkylation damage repair intermediates with mobility on 2D-gel that suggests presence of single-stranded regions. Genetic interaction studies showed that the flap endonuclease Fen1 works in the same pathway as Pol α in terms of alkylation damage response. Fen1 was also required for formation of alkylation- damage specific repair intermediates. We propose a model to explain how Pol α, Swi1, Swi3 and Fen1 might act together to detect and repair alkylation damage during S-phase.     

Strand displacement synthesis by yeast DNA polymerase ε

DNA polymerase ε (Pol ε) is a replicative DNA polymerase with an associated 3′–5′ exonuclease activity. Here, we explored the capacity of Pol ε to perform strand displacement synthesis, a process that influences many DNA transactions in vivo. We found that Pol ε is unable to carry out extended strand displacement synthesis unless its 3′–5′ exonuclease activity is removed. However, the wild-type Pol ε holoenzyme efficiently displaced one nucleotide when encountering double-stranded DNA after filling a gap or nicked DNA. A flap, mimicking a D-loop or a hairpin structure, on the 5′ end of the blocking primer inhibited Pol ε from synthesizing DNA up to the fork junction. This inhibition was observed for Pol ε but not with Pol δ, RB69 gp43 or Pol η. Neither was Pol ε able to extend a D-loop in reconstitution experiments. Finally, we show that the observed strand displacement synthesis by exonuclease-deficient Pol ε is distributive. Our results suggest that Pol ε is unable to extend the invading strand in D-loops during homologous recombination or to add more than two nucleotides during long-patch base excision repair. Our results support the hypothesis that Pol ε participates in short-patch base excision repair and ribonucleotide excision repair.     

The Pol β-14 Dominant Negative Rat DNA Polymerase β Mutator Mutant Commits Errors during the Gap-Filling Step of Base Excision Repair in Saccharomyces cerevisiae

We demonstrated recently that dominant negative mutants of rat DNA polymerase β (Pol β) interfere with repair of alkylation damage in Saccharomyces cerevisiae. To identify the alkylation repair pathway that is disrupted by the Pol β dominant negative mutants, we studied the epistatic relationship of the dominant negative Pol β mutants to genes known to be involved in repair of DNA alkylation damage in S. cerevisiae. We demonstrate that the rat Pol β mutants interfere with the base excision repair pathway in S. cerevisiae. In addition, expression of one of the Pol β dominant negative mutants, Pol β-14, increases the spontaneous mutation rate of S. cerevisiae whereas expression of another Pol β dominant negative mutant, Pol β-TR, does not. Expression of the Pol β-14 mutant in cells lacking APN1 activity does not result in an increase in the spontaneous mutation rate. These results suggest that gaps are required for mutagenesis to occur in the presence of Pol β-14 but that it is not merely the presence of a gap that results in mutagenesis. Our results suggest that mutagenesis can occur during the gap-filling step of base excision repair in vivo.     

Histones participate in base excision repair of 8-oxodGuo by transiently cross-linking with active repair intermediates in nucleosome core particles

8-Oxo-7,8-dihydro-2′-deoxyguanosine (8-oxodGuo) is a biomarker of oxidative DNA damage and can be repaired by hOGG1 and APE1 via the base excision repair (BER) pathway. In this work, we studied coordinated BER of 8-oxodGuo by hOGG1 and APE1 in nucleosome core particles and found that histones transiently formed DNA-protein cross-links (DPCs) with active repair intermediates such as 3′-phospho-α,β-unsaturated aldehyde (PUA) and 5′-deoxyribosephosphate (dRP). The effects of histone participation could be beneficial or deleterious to the BER process, depending on the circumstances. In the absence of APE1, histones enhanced the AP lyase activity of hOGG1 by cross-linking with 3′-PUA. However, the formed histone-PUA DPCs hampered the subsequent repair process. In the presence of APE1, both the AP lyase activity of hOGG1 and the formation of histone-PUA DPCs were suppressed. In this case, histones could catalyse removal of the 5′-dRP by transiently cross-linking with the active intermediate. That is, histones promoted the repair by acting as 5′-dRP lyases. Our findings demonstrate that histones participate in multiple steps of 8-oxodGuo repair in nucleosome core particles, highlighting the diverse roles that histones may play during DNA repair in eukaryotic cells.     

Human DNA polymerase β polymorphism, Arg137Gln, impairs its polymerase activity and interaction with PCNA and the cellular base excision repair capacity

DNA polymerase β (Pol β) is a key enzyme in DNA base excision repair, and an important factor for maintaining genome integrity and stability. More than 30% of human tumors characterized to date express DNA Pol β variants, many of which result from a single nucleotide residue substitution. However, in most cases, their precise functional deficiency and relationship to cancer susceptibility are still unknown. In the current work, we show that a polymorphism encoding an arginine to glutamine substitution, R137Q, has lower polymerase activity. The substitution also affects the interaction between Pol β and proliferating cell nuclear antigen (PCNA). These defects impair the DNA repair capacity of Pol β in reconstitution assays, as well as in cellular extracts. Expression of wild-type Pol β in pol β^−/− mouse embryonic fibroblast (MEF) cells restored cellular resistance to DNA damaging reagents such as methyl methanesulfonate (MMS) and N-methyl-N-nitrosourea (MNU), while expression of R137Q in pol β^−/− MEF cells failed to do so. These data indicate that polymorphisms in base excision repair genes may contribute to the onset and development of cancers.     

Replicative DNA Polymerase δ but Not ε Proofreads Errors in Cis and in Trans

It is now well established that in yeast, and likely most eukaryotic organisms, initial DNA replication of the leading strand is by DNA polymerase ε and of the lagging strand by DNA polymerase δ. However, the role of Pol δ in replication of the leading strand is uncertain. In this work, we use a reporter system in Saccharomyces cerevisiae to measure mutation rates at specific base pairs in order to determine the effect of heterozygous or homozygous proofreading-defective mutants of either Pol ε or Pol δ in diploid strains. We find that wild-type Pol ε molecules cannot proofread errors created by proofreading-defective Pol ε molecules, whereas Pol δ can not only proofread errors created by proofreading-defective Pol δ molecules, but can also proofread errors created by Pol ε-defective molecules. These results suggest that any interruption in DNA synthesis on the leading strand is likely to result in completion by Pol δ and also explain the higher mutation rates observed in Pol δ-proofreading mutants compared to Pol ε-proofreading defective mutants. For strains reverting via AT→GC, TA→GC, CG→AT, and GC→AT mutations, we find in addition a strong effect of gene orientation on mutation rate in proofreading-defective strains and demonstrate that much of this orientation dependence is due to differential efficiencies of mispair elongation. We also find that a 3′-terminal 8 oxoG, unlike a 3′-terminal G, is efficiently extended opposite an A and is not subject to proofreading. Proofreading mutations have been shown to result in tumor formation in both mice and humans; the results presented here can help explain the properties exhibited by those proofreading mutants.     

Regulation of yeast DNA polymerase δ-mediated strand displacement synthesis by 5′-flaps

The strand displacement activity of DNA polymerase δ is strongly stimulated by its interaction with proliferating cell nuclear antigen (PCNA). However, inactivation of the 3′–5′ exonuclease activity is sufficient to allow the polymerase to carry out strand displacement even in the absence of PCNA. We have examined in vitro the basic biochemical properties that allow Pol δ-exo⁻ to carry out strand displacement synthesis and discovered that it is regulated by the 5′-flaps in the DNA strand to be displaced. Under conditions where Pol δ carries out strand displacement synthesis, the presence of long 5′-flaps or addition in trans of ssDNA suppress this activity. This suggests the presence of a secondary DNA binding site on the enzyme that is responsible for modulation of strand displacement activity. The inhibitory effect of a long 5′-flap can be suppressed by its interaction with single-stranded DNA binding proteins. However, this relief of flap-inhibition does not simply originate from binding of Replication Protein A to the flap and sequestering it. Interaction of Pol δ with PCNA eliminates flap-mediated inhibition of strand displacement synthesis by masking the secondary DNA site on the polymerase. These data suggest that in addition to enhancing the processivity of the polymerase PCNA is an allosteric modulator of other Pol δ activities.     

Complementation of aprataxin deficiency by base excision repair enzymes

Abortive ligation during base excision repair (BER) leads to blocked repair intermediates containing a 5′-adenylated-deoxyribose phosphate (5′-AMP-dRP) group. Aprataxin (APTX) is able to remove the AMP group allowing repair to proceed. Earlier results had indicated that purified DNA polymerase β (pol β) removes the entire 5′-AMP-dRP group through its lyase activity and flap endonuclease 1 (FEN1) excises the 5′-AMP-dRP group along with one or two nucleotides. Here, using cell extracts from APTX-deficient cell lines, human Ataxia with Oculomotor Apraxia Type 1 (AOA1) and DT40 chicken B cell, we found that pol β and FEN1 enzymatic activities were prominent and strong enough to complement APTX deficiency. In addition, pol β, APTX and FEN1 coordinate with each other in processing of the 5′-adenylated dRP-containing BER intermediate. Finally, other DNA polymerases and a repair factor with dRP lyase activity (pol λ, pol ι, pol θ and Ku70) were found to remove the 5′-adenylated-dRP group from the BER intermediate. However, the activities of these enzymes were weak compared with those of pol β and FEN1.     

The accumulation of MMS-induced single strand breaks in G1 phase is recombinogenic in DNA polymerase beta defective mammalian cells

DNA polymerase (Pol) β null mouse embryonic fibroblasts provide a useful cell system to investigate the effects of alterations in base excision repair (BER) on genome stability. These cells are characterized by hypersensitivity to the cytotoxic effects of methyl methanesulfonate (MMS) and by decreased repair of the MMS-induced DNA single strand breaks (SSB). Here, we show that, in the absence of Pol β, SSB accumulate in G₁ phase cells, accompanied by the formation of proliferating cell nuclear antigen foci in the nuclei. When replicating Pol β null cells are treated with MMS, a rapid phosphorylation of histone H2AX is detected in the nuclei of S phase cells, indicating that double strand breaks (DSB) are formed in response to unrepaired SSB. This is followed by relocalization within the nuclei of Rad51 protein, which is essential for homologous recombination (HR). These findings are compatible with a model where, in mammalian cells, unrepaired SSB produced during BER are substrates for the HR pathway via DSB formation. This is an example of a coordinated effort of two different repair pathways, BER and HR, to protect mammalian cells from alkylation-induced cytotoxicity.     

The C-terminus of Dpb2 is required for interaction with Pol2 and for cell viability

DNA polymerase ε (Pol ε) participates in the synthesis of the leading strand during DNA replication in Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Pol ε comprises four subunits: the catalytic subunit, Pol2, and three accessory subunits, Dpb2, Dpb3 and Dpb4. DPB2 is an essential gene with unclear function. A genetic screen was performed in S. cerevisiae to isolate lethal mutations in DPB2. The dpb2-200 allele carried two mutations within the last 13 codons of the open reading frame, one of which resulted in a six amino acid truncation. This truncated Dpb2 subunit was co-expressed with Pol2, Dpb3 and Dpb4 in S. cerevisiae, but this Dpb2 variant did not co-purify with the other Pol ε subunits. This resulted in the purification of a Pol2/Dpb3/Dpb4 complex that possessed high specific activity and high processivity and holoenzyme assays with PCNA, RFC and RPA on a single-primed circular template did not reveal any defects in replication efficiency. In conclusion, the lack of Dpb2 did not appear to have a negative effect on Pol ε activity. Thus, the C-terminal motif of Dpb2 that we have identified may instead be required for Dpb2 to fulfill an essential structural role at the replication origin or at the replication fork.     

Enzymatic switching for efficient and accurate translesion DNA replication

When cyclobutane pyrimidine dimers stall DNA replication by DNA polymerase (Pol) δ or ε, a switch occurs to allow translesion synthesis by DNA polymerase η, followed by another switch that allows normal replication to resume. In the present study, we investigate these switches using Saccharomyces cerevisiae Pol δ, Pol ε and Pol η and a series of matched and mismatched primer templates that mimic each incorporation needed to completely bypass a cis–syn thymine–thymine (TT) dimer. We report a complementary pattern of substrate use indicating that enzymatic switching involving localized translesion synthesis by Pol η and mismatch excision and polymerization by a major replicative polymerase can account for the efficient and accurate dimer bypass known to suppress sunlight-induced mutagenesis and skin cancer.     

Mating-Type Regulation of Methyl Methanesulfonate Sensitivity in SACCHAROMYCES CEREVISIAE

Heterozygosity at the mating-type locus (MAT) in Saccharomyces cerevisiae has been shown previously to enhance X-ray survival in diploid cells. We now show that a/α diploids are also more resistant to the radiomimetic agent methyl methanesulfonate (MMS) than are diploids that are homozygous at MAT (i.e., either a/a or α/α). Log-phase a/α cultures exhibit biphasic MMS survival curves, in which the more resistant fraction consists of budded cells (those cells in the S and G2 phases of the cell cycle). Survival curves for log-phase cultures of a/a or α/α diploids have little if any biphasic nature, suggesting that the enhanced S- and G2-phase repair capacity of a/α cells may be associated with heterozygosity at MAT. The survival of cells arrested at the beginning of the S phase with hydroxyurea indicates that MAT-dependent MMS repair is limited to S and G2, whereas MAT-independent repair can occur in G1.     

The eukaryotic leading and lagging strand DNA polymerases are loaded onto primer-ends via separate mechanisms but have comparable processivity in the presence of PCNA

Saccharomyces cerevisiae DNA polymerase δ (Pol δ) and DNA polymerase ε (Pol ε) are replicative DNA polymerases at the replication fork. Both enzymes are stimulated by PCNA, although to different levels. To understand why and to explore the interaction with PCNA, we compared Pol δ and Pol ε in physical interactions with PCNA and nucleic acids (with or without RPA), and in functional assays measuring activity and processivity. Using surface plasmon resonance technique, we show that Pol ε has a high affinity for DNA, but a low affinity for PCNA. In contrast, Pol δ has a low affinity for DNA and a high affinity for PCNA. The true processivity of Pol δ and Pol ε was measured for the first time in the presence of RPA, PCNA and RFC on single-stranded DNA. Remarkably, in the presence of PCNA, the processivity of Pol δ and Pol ε on RPA-coated DNA is comparable. Finally, more PCNA molecules were found on the template after it was replicated by Pol ε when compared to Pol δ. We conclude that Pol ε and Pol δ exhibit comparable processivity, but are loaded on the primer-end via different mechanisms.     

AP endonucleases process 5-methylcytosine excision intermediates during active DNA demethylation in Arabidopsis

DNA methylation is a primary epigenetic modification regulating gene expression and chromatin structure in many eukaryotes. Plants have a unique DNA demethylation system in that 5-methylcytosine (5mC) is directly removed by DNA demethylases, such as DME/ROS1 family proteins, but little is known about the downstream events. During 5mC excision, DME produces 3′-phosphor-α, β-unsaturated aldehyde and 3′-phosphate by successive β- and δ-eliminations, respectively. The kinetic studies revealed that these 3′-blocking lesions persist for a significant amount of time and at least two different enzyme activities are required to immediately process them. We demonstrate that Arabidopsis AP endonucleases APE1L, APE2 and ARP have distinct functions to process such harmful lesions to allow nucleotide extension. DME expression is toxic to E. coli due to excessive 5mC excision, but expression of APE1L or ARP significantly reduces DME-induced cytotoxicity. Finally, we propose a model of base excision repair and DNA demethylation pathway unique to plants.     

A Substitution in the Fingers Domain of DNA Polymerase δ Reduces Fidelity by Altering Nucleotide Discrimination in the Catalytic Site

DNA polymerase δ (Pol δ) is one of the major replicative DNA polymerases in eukaryotic cells, catalyzing lagging strand synthesis as well as playing a role in many DNA repair pathways. The catalytic site for polymerization consists of a palm domain and mobile fingers domain that opens and closes each catalytic cycle. We explored the effect of amino acid substitutions in a region of the highly conserved sequence motif B in the fingers domain on replication fidelity. A novel substitution, A699Q, results in a marked increase in mutation rate at the yeast CAN1 locus, and is synthetic lethal with both proofreading deficiency and mismatch repair deficiency. Modeling the A699Q mutation onto the crystal structure of Saccharomyces cerevisiae Pol δ template reveals four potential contacts for A699Q but not for A699. We substituted alanine for each of these residues and determined that an interaction with multiple residues of the N-terminal domain is responsible for the mutator phenotype. The corresponding mutation in purified human Pol δ results in a similar 30-fold increase in mutation frequency when copying gapped DNA templates. Sequence analysis indicates that the most characteristic mutation is a guanine-to-adenine (G to A) transition. The increase in deoxythymidine 5′-triphosphate-G mispairs was confirmed by performing steady state single nucleotide addition studies. Our combined data support a model in which the Ala-to-Gln substitution in the fingers domain of Pol δ results in an interaction with the N-terminal domain that affects the base selectivity of the enzyme.