Relevance of rhodopsin studies for GPCR activation

Rhodopsin, the dim-light photoreceptor present in the rod cells of the retina, is both a retinal-binding protein and a G protein-coupled receptor (GPCR). Due to this conjunction, it benefits from an arsenal of spectroscopy techniques that can be used for its characterization, while being a model system for the important family of Class A (also referred to as “rhodopsin-like”) GPCRs. For instance, rhodopsin has been a crucial player in the field of GPCR structural biology. Until 2007, it was the only GPCR for which a high-resolution crystal structure was available, so all structure–activity analyses on GPCRs, from structure-based drug discovery to studies of structural changes upon activation, were based on rhodopsin. At present, about a third of currently available GPCR structures are still from rhodopsin. In this review, I show some examples of how these structures can still be used to gain insight into general aspects of GPCR activation. First, the analysis of the third intracellular loop in rhodopsin structures allows us to gain an understanding of the structural and dynamic properties of this region, which is absent (due to protein engineering or poor electron density) in most of the currently available GPCR structures. Second, a detailed analysis of the structure of the transmembrane domains in inactive, intermediate and active rhodopsin structures allows us to detect early conformational changes in the process of ligand-induced GPCR activation. Finally, the analysis of a conserved ligand-activated transmission switch in the transmembrane bundle of GPCRs in the context of the rhodopsin activation cycle, allows us to suggest that the structures of many of the currently available agonist-bound GPCRs may correspond to intermediate active states. While the focus in GPCR structural biology is inevitably moving away from rhodopsin, in other aspects rhodopsin is still at the forefront. For instance, the first studies of the structural basis of disease mutants in GPCRs, or the most detailed analysis of cellular GPCR signal transduction networks using a systems biology approach, have been carried out in rhodopsin. Finally, due again to its unique properties among GPCRs, rhodopsin will likely play an important role in the application of X-ray free electron laser crystallography to time-resolved structural biology in membrane proteins. Rhodopsin, thus, still remains relevant as a model system to study the molecular mechanisms of GPCR activation. This article is part of a Special Issue entitled: Retinal Proteins—You can teach an old dog new tricks.     

Rhodopsin activation causes retinal degeneration in Drosophila rdgC mutant

Drosophila rdgC (retinal degeneration-C) mutants show normal retinal morphology and photoreceptor physiology at young ages. Dark-reared rdgC flies retain this wild-type phenotype, but light-reared mutants undergo retinal degeneration. rdgC photoreceptors with low levels of rhodopsin as a result of vitamin A deprivation or a mutant rhodopsin (ninaE) gene fail to show rdgC-induced degeneration even after prolonged light treatment, demonstrating that degeneration occurs as a result of light stimulation of rhodopsin. Analysis of norpA; rdgC flies shows that the norpA-encoded phospholipase C, the target enzyme of the G protein activated by rhodopsin, is not required for rdgC-induced degeneration. Thus the rdgC+ gene product is required to prevent retinal degeneration that results from a previously unrecognized consequence of rhodopsin stimulation.     

Structural biology of G protein‐coupled receptor signaling complexes

G protein‐coupled receptors (GPCRs) constitute the largest family of cell surface receptors that mediate numerous cell signaling pathways, and are targets of more than one‐third of clinical drugs. Thanks to the advancement of novel structural biology technologies, high‐resolution structures of GPCRs in complex with their signaling transducers, including G‐protein and arrestin, have been determined. These 3D complex structures have significantly improved our understanding of the molecular mechanism of GPCR signaling and provided a structural basis for signaling‐biased drug discovery targeting GPCRs. Here we summarize structural studies of GPCR signaling complexes with G protein and arrestin using rhodopsin as a model system, and highlight the key features of GPCR conformational states in biased signaling including the sequence motifs of receptor TM6 that determine selective coupling of G proteins, and the phosphorylation codes of GPCRs for arrestin recruitment. We envision the future of GPCR structural biology not only to solve more high‐resolution complex structures but also to show stepwise GPCR signaling complex assembly and disassembly and dynamic process of GPCR signal transduction.     

Arrestin interaction with rhodopsin

It is becoming increasingly apparent that G protein-coupled receptors (GPCRs) can exist and function as oligomers. This notion differs from the classical view of signaling wherein the receptor has been presumed to be monomeric. Despite this shift in views, the interpretation of data related to GPCR function is still largely carried out within the framework of a monomeric receptor. Rhodopsin is a prototypical GPCR that initiates phototransduction. Like other GPCRs, the activity of rhodopsin is regulated by phosphorylation and the binding of arrestin. In the current investigation, we have explored by modeling methods the interaction of rhodopsin and arrestin under the assumption that either one or two rhodopsin molecules bind each arrestin molecule. The dimeric receptor framework may provide a more accurate representation of the system and is therefore likely to lead to a better and more accurate understanding of GPCR signaling.     

A concept for G protein activation by G protein-coupled receptor dimers: the transducin/rhodopsin interface.

G protein-coupled receptors (GPCRs) are ubiquitous and essential in modulating virtually all physiological processes. These receptors share a similar structural design consisting of the seven-transmembrane alpha-helical segments. The active conformations of the receptors are stabilized by an agonist and couple to structurally highly conserved heterotrimeric G proteins. One of the most important unanswered questions is how GPCRs couple to their cognate G proteins. Phototransduction represents an excellent model system for understanding G protein signaling, owing to the high expression of rhodopsin in rod photoreceptors and the multidisciplinary experimental approaches used to study this GPCR. Here, we describe how a G protein (transducin) docks on to an oligomeric GPCR (rhodopsin), revealing structural details of this critical interface in the signal transduction process. This conceptual model takes into account recent structural information on the receptor and G protein, as well as oligomeric states of GPCRs.     

Rapid dephosphorylation of G protein-coupled receptors by protein phosphatase 1β is required for termination of β-arrestin-dependent signaling

Termination of signaling of activated G protein-coupled receptors (GPCRs) is essential for maintenance of cellular homeostasis. It is well established that β-arrestin redistributes to phosphorylated GPCRs and thereby facilitates desensitization of classical G protein-dependent signaling. β-Arrestin in turn serves as a scaffold to initiate a second wave of signaling. Here, we report a molecular mechanism that regulates the termination of unconventional β-arrestin-dependent GPCR signaling. We identify protein phosphatase 1β (PP1β) as a phosphatase for the cluster of phosphorylated threonines ((353)TTETQRT(359)) within the sst(2A) somatostatin receptor carboxyl terminus that mediates β-arrestin binding using siRNA knock-down screening. We show that PP1β-mediated sst(2A) dephosphorylation is initiated directly after receptor activation at or near the plasma membrane. As a functional consequence of diminished PP1β activity, we find that somatostatin- and substance P-induced but not epidermal growth factor-induced ERK activation was aberrantly enhanced and prolonged. Thus, we demonstrate a novel mechanism for fine tuning unconventional β-arrestin-dependent GPCR signaling in that recruitment of PP1β to activated GPCRs facilitates GPCR dephosphorylation and, hence, leads to disruption of the β-arrestin-GPCR complex.     

G-protein coupled receptor structure

Because of their central role in regulation of cellular function, structure/function relationships for G-protein coupled receptors (GPCR) are of vital importance, yet only recently have sufficient data been obtained to begin mapping those relationships. GPCRs regulate a wide range of cellular processes, including the senses of taste, smell, and vision, and control a myriad of intracellular signaling systems in response to external stimuli. Many diseases are linked to GPCRs. A critical need exists for structural information to inform studies on mechanism of receptor action and regulation. X-ray crystal structures of only one GPCR, in an inactive state, have been obtained to date. However considerable structural information for a variety of GPCRs has been obtained using non-crystallographic approaches. This review begins with a review of the very earliest GPCR structural information, mostly derived from rhodopsin. Because of the difficulty in crystallizing GPCRs for X-ray crystallography, the extensive published work utilizing alternative approaches to GPCR structure is reviewed, including determination of three-dimensional structure from sparse constraints. The available X-ray crystallographic analyses on bovine rhodopsin are reviewed as the only available high-resolution structures for any GPCR. Structural information available on ligand binding to several receptors is included. The limited information on excited states of receptors is also reviewed. It is concluded that while considerable basic structural information has been obtained, more data are needed to describe the molecular mechanism of activation of a GPCR.     

A model for how Gβγ couples Gα to GPCR

Representing ∼5% of the human genome, G-protein-coupled receptors (GPCRs) are a primary target for drug discovery; however, the molecular details of how they couple to heterotrimeric G protein subunits are incompletely understood. Here, I propose a hypothetical initial docking model for the encounter between GPCR and Gβγ that is defined by transient interactions between the cytosolic surface of the GPCR and the prenyl moiety and the tripeptide motif, asparagine–proline–phenylalanine (NPF), in the C-terminus of the Gγ subunit. Analysis of class A GPCRs reveals a conserved NPF binding site formed by the interaction of the TM1 and H8. Functional studies using differentially prenylated proteins and peptides further suggest that the intracellular hydrophobic core of the GPCR is a prenyl binding site. Upon binding TM1 and H8 of GPCRs, the propensity of the C-terminal region of Gγ to convert into an α helix allows it to extend into the hydrophobic core of the GPCR, facilitating the GPCR active state. Conservation of the NPF motif in Gγ isoforms and interacting residues in TM1 and H8 suggest that this is a general mechanism of GPCR–G protein signaling. Analysis of the rhodopsin dimer also suggests that Gγ–rhodopsin interactions may facilitate GPCR dimer transactivation.     

Characterization of a calmodulin-dependent protein phosphatase from human platelets

A calmodulin-dependent protein phosphatase has been identified in human platelets by its cross-reactivity with an antibody developed against a bovine brain calmodulin-dependent protein phosphatase and by its calmodulin-stimulated dephosphorylation of 32P-labeled substrates. The platelet enzyme was partially purified to separate it from calmodulin and calmodulin-independent phosphatases. The partially purified enzyme was stimulated by calmodulin, requiring 15 nM calmodulin for half-maximal activation. Calmodulin increased the Vmax of the phosphatase, with no significant effect on its Km. The enzyme was stimulated irreversibly and made calmodulin-independent by limited proteolysis. The optimal pH for the phosphatase was 7.5. After partial purification, phosphatase activity was significantly increased in the presence of Mn2+ and Ca2+ over that observed in the presence of Ca2+ alone. The enzyme effectively dephosphorylated casein, histone, protamine, and platelet actin. The holophosphatase was estimated to have a molecular weight of 76,900 as determined by sedimentation on sucrose gradients. Immunoblotting techniques using an antibody against the brain phosphatase suggests that the enzyme consists of 2 subunits of 60,000 and 16,500 daltons; the 60,000-dalton subunit co-migrates in sodium dodecyl sulfate-polyacrylamide gel electrophoresis with a 60,000-dalton calmodulin-binding protein in the platelet suggesting that it is the calmodulin-binding subunit of the enzyme. The identification of a calmodulin-dependent protein phosphatase in human platelets suggests a role for Ca2+-dependent dephosphorylation in platelet activation.     

RGS expression rate-limits recovery of rod photoresponses

Signaling through G protein-coupled receptors (GPCRs) underlies many cellular processes, yet it is not known which molecules determine the duration of signaling in intact cells. Two candidates are G protein-coupled receptor kinases (GRKs) and Regulators of G protein signaling (RGSs), deactivation enzymes for GPCRs and G proteins, respectively. Here we investigate whether GRK or RGS governs the overall rate of recovery of the light response in mammalian rod photoreceptors, a model system for studying GPCR signaling. We show that overexpression of rhodopsin kinase (GRK1) increases phosphorylation of the GPCR rhodopsin but has no effect on photoresponse recovery. In contrast, overexpression of the photoreceptor RGS complex (RGS9-1.Gbeta5L.R9AP) dramatically accelerates response recovery. Our results show that G protein deactivation is normally at least 2.5 times slower than rhodopsin deactivation, resolving a long-standing controversy concerning the mechanism underlying the recovery of rod visual transduction.     

Crystal structure of rhodopsin: implications for vision and beyond

A heptahelical transmembrane bundle is a common structural feature of G-protein-coupled receptors (GPCRs) and bacterial retinal-binding proteins, two functionally distinct groups of membrane proteins. Rhodopsin, a photoreceptor protein involved in photopic (rod) vision, is a prototypical GPCR that contains 11-cis-retinal as its intrinsic chromophore ligand. Therefore, uniquely, rhodopsin is a GPCR and also a retinal-binding protein, but is not found in bacteria. Rhodopsin functions as a typical GPCR in processes that are triggered by light and photoisomerization of its ligand. Bacteriorhodopsin is a light-driven proton pump with an all-trans-retinal chromophore that photoisomerizes to 13-cis-retinal. The recent crystal structure determination of bovine rhodopsin revealed a structure that is not similar to previously established bacteriorhodopsin structures. Both groups of proteins have a heptahelical transmembrane bundle structure, but the helices are arranged differently. The activation of rhodopsin involves rapid cis-trans photoisomerization of the chromophore, followed by slower and incompletely defined structural rearrangements. For rhodopsin and related receptors, a common mechanism is predicted for the formation of an active state intermediate that is capable of interacting with G proteins.     

Monomeric G-protein-coupled receptor as a functional unit

Rhodopsin, the first purified G-protein-coupled receptor (GPCR), was characterized as a functional monomer 30 year ago, but dimerization of GPCRs recently became the new paradigm of signal transduction. It has even been claimed, on the basis of recent biophysical and biochemical studies, that this new concept could be extended to higher-order oligomerization. Here this view is challenged. The new studies of rhodopsin and other simple (class 1a) GPCRs solubilized in detergent are re-assessed and are compared to the earlier classical studies of rhodopsin and other membrane proteins solubilized in detergent. The new studies are found to strengthen rather than invalidate the conclusions of the early ones and to support a monomeric model for rhodopsin and other class 1a GPCRs. A molecular model is proposed for the functional coupling of a rhodopsin monomeric unit with a G-protein heterotrimer. This model should be valid even for GPCRs that exist as structural dimers.     

Conformational changes of G protein-coupled receptors during their activation by agonist binding

The superfamily of G protein-coupled receptors (GPCRs) is the largest and most diverse group of transmembrane proteins involved in signal transduction. Many of the over 1000 human GPCRs represent important pharmaceutical targets. However, despite high interest in this receptor family, no high-resolution structure of a human GPCR has been resolved yet. This is mainly due to difficulties in obtaining large quantities of pure and active protein. Until now, only a high-resolution x-ray structure of an inactive state of bovine rhodopsin is available. Since no structure of an active state has been solved, information of the GPCR activation process can be gained only by biophysical techniques. In this review, we first describe what is known about the ground state of GPCRs to then address questions about the nature of the conformational changes taking place during receptor activation and the mechanism controlling the transition from the resting to the active state. Finally, we will also address the question to what extent information about the three-dimensional GPCR structure can be included into pharmaceutical drug design programs.     

Conformational Changes of G Protein‐Coupled Receptors During Their Activation by Agonist Binding

Abstract

The superfamily of G protein‐coupled receptors (GPCRs) is the largest and most diverse group of transmembrane proteins involved in signal transduction. Many of the over 1000 human GPCRs represent important pharmaceutical targets. However, despite high interest in this receptor family, no high‐resolution structure of a human GPCR has been resolved yet. This is mainly due to difficulties in obtaining large quantities of pure and active protein. Until now, only a high‐resolution x‐ray structure of an inactive state of bovine rhodopsin is available. Since no structure of an active state has been solved, information of the GPCR activation process can be gained only by biophysical techniques. In this review, we first describe what is known about the ground state of GPCRs to then address questions about the nature of the conformational changes taking place during receptor activation and the mechanism controlling the transition from the resting to the active state. Finally, we will also address the question to what extent information about the three‐dimensional GPCR structure can be included into pharmaceutical drug design programs.     

NMR structure of the second intracellular loop of the alpha 2A adrenergic receptor: evidence for a novel cytoplasmic helix

A major, unresolved question in signal transduction by G protein coupled receptors (GPCRs) is to understand how, at atomic resolution, a GPCR activates a G protein. A step toward answering this question was made with the determination of the high-resolution structure of rhodopsin; we now know the intramolecular interactions that characterize the resting conformation of a GPCR. To what degree does this structure represent a structural paradigm for other GPCRs, especially at the cytoplasmic surface where GPCR-G protein interaction occurs and where the sequence homology is low among GPCRs? To address this question, we performed NMR studies on approximately 35-residue-long peptides including the critical second intracellular loop (i2) of the alpha 2A adrenergic receptor (AR) and of rhodopsin. To stabilize the secondary structure of the peptide termini, 4-12 residues from the adjacent transmembrane helices were included and structures determined in dodecylphosphocholine micelles. We also characterized the effects on an alpha 2A AR peptide of a D130I mutation in the conserved DRY motif. Our results show that in contrast to the L-shaped loop in the i2 of rhodopsin, the i2 of the alpha 2A AR is predominantly helical, supporting the hypothesis that there is structural diversity within GPCR intracellular loops. The D130I mutation subtly modulates the helical structure. The spacing of nonpolar residues in i2 with helical periodicity is a predictor of helical versus loop structure. These data should lead to more accurate models of the intracellular surface of GPCRs and of receptor-mediated G protein activation.     

Molecular dynamics simulations of bovine rhodopsin: influence of protonation states and different membrane-mimicking environments

G-protein coupled receptors (GPCRs) are a protein family of outstanding pharmaceutical interest. GPCR homology models, based on the crystal structure of bovine rhodopsin, have been shown to be valuable tools in the drug-design process. The initial model is often refined by molecular dynamics (MD) simulations, a procedure that has been recently discussed controversially. We therefore analyzed MD simulations of bovine rhodopsin in order to identify contacts that could serve as constraints in the simulation of homology models. Additionally, the effect of an N-terminal truncation, the nature of the membrane mimic, the influence of varying protonation states of buried residues and the importance of internal water molecules was analyzed. All simulations were carried out using the program-package GROMACS. While N-terminal truncation negatively influenced the overall protein stability, a stable simulation was possible in both solvent environments. As regards the protonation state of titratable sites, the experimental data could be reproduced by the program UHBD (University of Houston Brownian Dynamics), suggesting its application for studying homology models of GPCRs. A high flexibility was observed for internal water molecules at some sites. Finally, interhelical hydrogen-bonding interactions could be derived, which can now serve as constraints in the simulations of GPCR homology models.     

The structural evolution of a P2Y-like G-protein-coupled receptor

Based on the now available crystallographic data of the G-protein-coupled receptor (GPCR) prototype rhodopsin, many studies have been undertaken to build or verify models of other GPCRs. Here, we mined evolution as an additional source of structural information that may guide GPCR model generation as well as mutagenesis studies. The sequence information of 61 cloned orthologs of a P2Y-like receptor (GPR34) enabled us to identify motifs and residues that are important for maintaining the receptor function. The sequence data were compared with available sequences of 77 rhodopsin orthologs. Under a negative selection mode, only 17% of amino acid residues were preserved during 450 million years of GPR34 evolution. On the contrary, in rhodopsin evolution approximately 43% residues were absolutely conserved between fish and mammals. Despite major differences in their structural conservation, a comparison of structural data suggests that the global arrangement of the transmembrane core of GPR34 orthologs is similar to rhodopsin. The evolutionary approach was further applied to functionally analyze the relevance of common scaffold residues and motifs found in most of the rhodopsin-like GPCRs. Our analysis indicates that, in contrast to other GPCRs, maintaining the unique function of rhodopsin requires a more stringent network of relevant intramolecular constrains.     

Monomeric rhodopsin is sufficient for normal rhodopsin kinase (GRK1) phosphorylation and arrestin-1 binding

G-protein-coupled receptor (GPCR) oligomerization has been observed in a wide variety of experimental contexts, but the functional significance of this phenomenon at different stages of the life cycle of class A GPCRs remains to be elucidated. Rhodopsin (Rh), a prototypical class A GPCR of visual transduction, is also capable of forming dimers and higher order oligomers. The recent demonstration that Rh monomer is sufficient to activate its cognate G protein, transducin, prompted us to test whether the same monomeric state is sufficient for rhodopsin phosphorylation and arrestin-1 binding. Here we show that monomeric active rhodopsin is phosphorylated by rhodopsin kinase (GRK1) as efficiently as rhodopsin in the native disc membrane. Monomeric phosphorylated light-activated Rh (P-Rh*) in nanodiscs binds arrestin-1 essentially as well as P-Rh* in native disc membranes. We also measured the affinity of arrestin-1 for P-Rh* in nanodiscs using a fluorescence-based assay and found that arrestin-1 interacts with monomeric P-Rh* with low nanomolar affinity and 1:1 stoichiometry, as previously determined in native disc membranes. Thus, similar to transducin activation, rhodopsin phosphorylation by GRK1 and high affinity arrestin-1 binding only requires a rhodopsin monomer.     

Comparative Sequence and Structural Analyses of G-Protein-Coupled Receptor Crystal Structures and Implications for Molecular Models

Background

Up until recently the only available experimental (high resolution) structure of a G-protein-coupled receptor (GPCR) was that of bovine rhodopsin. In the past few years the determination of GPCR structures has accelerated with three new receptors, as well as squid rhodopsin, being successfully crystallized. All share a common molecular architecture of seven transmembrane helices and can therefore serve as templates for building molecular models of homologous GPCRs. However, despite the common general architecture of these structures key differences do exist between them. The choice of which experimental GPCR structure(s) to use for building a comparative model of a particular GPCR is unclear and without detailed structural and sequence analyses, could be arbitrary. The aim of this study is therefore to perform a systematic and detailed analysis of sequence-structure relationships of known GPCR structures.

Methodology

We analyzed in detail conserved and unique sequence motifs and structural features in experimentally-determined GPCR structures. Deeper insight into specific and important structural features of GPCRs as well as valuable information for template selection has been gained. Using key features a workflow has been formulated for identifying the most appropriate template(s) for building homology models of GPCRs of unknown structure. This workflow was applied to a set of 14 human family A GPCRs suggesting for each the most appropriate template(s) for building a comparative molecular model.

Conclusions

The available crystal structures represent only a subset of all possible structural variation in family A GPCRs. Some GPCRs have structural features that are distributed over different crystal structures or which are not present in the templates suggesting that homology models should be built using multiple templates. This study provides a systematic analysis of GPCR crystal structures and a consistent method for identifying suitable templates for GPCR homology modelling that will help to produce more reliable three-dimensional models.