Organization and function of cytochromeb and ubiquinone in the cristae membrane of beef heart mitochondria

The arrangement and function of the redox centers of the mammalianbc ₁ complex is described on the basis of structural data derived from amino acid sequence studies and secondary structure predictions and on the basis of functional studies (i.e., EPR data, inhibitor studies, and kinetic experiments). Two ubiquinone reaction centers do exist—a QH₂ oxidation center situated at the outer, cytosolic surface of the cristae membrane (Q₀ center), and a Q reduction center (Q _i center) situated more to the inner surface of the cristae membrane. The Q₀ center is formed by theb-566 domain of cytochromeb, the FeS protein, and maybe an additional small subunit, whereas the Q _i center is formed by theb-562 domain of cytochromeb and presumably the 13.4kDa protein (QP-C). The Q binding proteins are proposed to be protein subunits of the Q reaction centers of various multiprotein complexes. The path of electron flow branches at the Q₀ center, half of the electrons flowing via the high-potential cytochrome chain to oxygen and half of the electrons cycling back into the Q pool via the cytochromeb path connecting the two Q reaction centers. During oxidation of QH₂, 2H⁺ are released to the cytosolic space and during reduction of Q, 2H⁺ are taken up from the matrix side, resulting in a net transport across the membrane of 2H⁺ per e^– flown from QH₂ to cytochromec, the H⁺ being transported across the membrane as H (H⁺ + e^–) by the mobile carrier Q. The authors correct their earlier view of cytochromeb functioning as a H⁺ pump, proposing that the redox-linkedpK changes of the acidic groups of cytochromeb are involved in the protonation/deprotonation processes taking place during the reduction and oxidation of Q. The reviewers stress that cytochromeb is in equilibrium with the Q pool via the Q _i center, but not via the Q₀ center. Their view of the mechanisms taking place at the reductase is a Q cycle linked to a Q-pool where cytochromeb is acting as an electron pump.     

What information do inhibitors provide about the structure of the hydroquinone oxidation site of ubihydroquinone: Cytochromec oxidoreductase?

The Q cycle mechanism of thebc ₁ complex requires two quinone reaction centers, the hydroquinone oxidation (Q_P) and the quinone reduction (Q_N) center. These sites can be distinguished by the specific binding of inhibitors to either of them. A substantial body of information about the hydroquinone oxidation site has been provided by the analysis of the binding of Q_P site inhibitors to thebc ₁ complex in different redox states and to preparations depleted of lipid or protein components as well as by functional studies with mutantbc ₁ complexes selected for resistance toward the inhibitors. The reaction site is formed by at least five protein segments of cytochromeb and parts of the iron-sulfur protein. At least two different binding sites for Q_P site inhibitors could be detected, one for the methoxyacrylate-type inhibitors binding predominantly to cytochromeb, the other for the chromone-type inhibitors and hydroxyquinones binding predominantly to the iron-sulfur protein. The interactions with the protein segments, between different protein segments, and between protein and ligands (substrate, inhibitors) are discussed in detail and a working model of the Q_P pocket is proposed.     

Insight into the active-site structure and function of cytochrome oxidase by analysis of site-directed mutants of bacterial cytochromeaa 3 and cytochromebo

Cytochromeaa ₃ ofRhodobacter sphaeroides and cytochromebo ofE. coli are useful models of the more complex cytochromec oxidase of eukaryotes, as demonstrated by the genetic, spectroscopic, and functional studies reviewed here. A summary of site-directed mutants of conserved residues in these two enzymes is presented and discussed in terms of a current model of the structure of the metal centers and evidence for regions of the protein likely to be involved in proton transfer. The model of ligation of the hemea ₃ (oro)-Cu_B center, in which both hemes are bound to helix X of subunit I, has important implications for the pathways and control of electron transfer.     

Thebc 1 complexes ofRhodobacter sphaeroides andRhodobacter capsulatus

Photosynthetic bacteria offer excellent experimental opportunities to explore both the structure and function of the ubiquinol-cytochromec oxidoreductase (bc ₁ complex). In bothRhodobacter sphaeroides andRhodobacter capsulatus, thebc ₁ complex functions in both the aerobic respiratory chain and as an essential component of the photosynthetic electron transport chain. Because thebc ₁ complex in these organisms can be functionally coupled to the photosynthetic reaction center, flash photolysis can be used to study electron flow through the enzyme and to examine the effects of various amino acid substitutions. During the past several years, numerous mutations have been generated in the cytochromeb subunit, in the Rieske iron-sulfur subunit, and in the cytochromec ₁ subunit. Both site-directed and random mutagenesis procedures have been utilized. Studies of these mutations have identified amino acid residues that are metal ligands, as well as those residues that are at or near either the quinol oxidase (Q_o) site or the quinol reductase (Q_i) site. The postulate that these two Q-sites are located on opposite sides of the membrane is supported by these studies. Current research is directed at exploring the details of the catalytic mechanism, the nature of the subunit interactions, and the assembly of this enzyme.     

Evolution of the cytochromeb gene of mammals

Summary With the polymerase chain reaction (PCR) and versatile primers that amplify the whole cytochromeb gene (∼ 1140 bp), we obtained 17 complete gene sequences representing three orders of hoofed mammals (ungulates) and dolphins (cetaceans). The fossil record of some ungulate lineages allowed estimation of the evolutionary rates for various components of the cytochromeb DNA and amino acid sequences. The relative rates of substitution at first, second, and third positions within codons are in the ratio 10 to 1 to at least 33. For deep divergences (>5 million years) it appears that both replacements and silent transversions in this mitochondrial gene can be used for phylogenetic inference. Phylogenetic findings include the association of (1) cetaceans, artiodactyls, and perissodactyls to the exclusion of elephants and humans, (2) pronghorn and fallow deer to the exclusion of bovids (i. e., cow, sheep, and goat), (3) sheep and goat to the exclusion of other pecorans (i. e., cow, giraffe, deer, and pronghorn), and (4) advanced ruminants to the exclusion of the chevrotain and other artiodactyls. Comparisons of these cytochromeb sequences support current structure-function models for this membrane-spanning protein. That part of the outer surface which includes the Q_o redox center is more constrained than the remainder of the molecule, namely, the transmembrane segments and the surface that protrudes into the mitochondrial matrix. Many of the amino acid replacements within the transmembrane segments are exchanges between hydrophobic residues (especially leucine, isoleucine, and valine). Replacement changes at first and second positions of codons approximate a negative binomial distribution, similar to other protein-coding sequences. At four-fold degenerate positions of codons, the nucleotide substitutions approximate a Poisson distribution, implying that the underlying mutational spectrum is random with respect to position.     

Interaction of horse cytochromec with the photosynthetic reaction center ofRhodospirillum rubrum

Mitochondrial cytochromec (horse), which is a very efficient electron donor to bacterial photosynthetic reaction centersin vitro, binds to the reaction center ofRhodospirillum rubrum with an approximate dissociation constant of 0.3–0.5 µM at pH 8.2 and low ionic strength. The binding site for the reaction center is on the frontside of cytochromec which is the side with the exposed heme edge, as revealed by differential chemical acetylation of lysines of free and reaction-center-bound cytochromec. In contrast, bacterial cytochromec ₂ was found previously to bind to the detergent-solubilized reaction center through its backside, i.e., the side opposite to the heme cleft [Rieder, R., Wiemken, V., Bachofen, R., and Bosshard, H. R. (1985).Biochem. Biophys. Res. Commun. 128, 120–126]. Binding of mitochondrial cytochromec but not of mitochondrial cytochromec ₂ is strongly inhibited by low concentrations of poly-l-lysine. The results are difficult to reconcile with the existence of an electron transfer site on the backside of cytochromec ₂.     

How rapid are the internal reactions of the ubiquinol:cytochrome c 2 oxidoreductase?

The temperature dependence of the partial reactions leading to turn-over of the UQH₂:cyt c ₂ oxidoreductase of Rhodobacter sphaeroides have been studied. The redox properties of the cytochrome components show a weak temperature dependence over the range 280–330 K, with coefficients of about 1 m V per degree; our results suggest that the other components show similar dependencies, so that no significant change in the gradient of standard free-energy between components occurs over this temperature range. The rates of the reactions of the high potential chain (the Rieske iron sulfur center, cytochromes c ₁ and c ₂, reaction center primary donor) show a weak temperature dependence, indicating an activation energy < 8 kJ per mole for electron transfer in this chain. The oxidation of ubiquinol at the Q_z-site of the complex showed a strong temperature dependence, with an activation energy of about 32 kJ mole^–1. The electron transfer from cytochrome b-566 to cytochrome b-561 was not rate determining at any temperature, and did not contribute to the energy barrier. The activation energy of 32 kJ mole^–1 for quinol oxidation was the same for all states of the quinone pool (fully oxidized, partially reduced, or fully reduced before the flash). We suggest that the activation barrier is in the reaction by which ubiquinol at the catalytic site is oxidized to semiquinone. The most economical scheme for this reaction would have the semiquinone intermediate at the energy level indicated by the activation barrier. We discuss the plausibility of this simple model, and the values for rate constants, stability constant, the redox potentials of the intermediate couples, and the binding constant for the semiquinone, which are pertinent to the mechanism of the ubiquinol oxidizing site.Abbreviations (BChl)₂ P870, primary donor of the photochemical reaction center - b/c ₁ complex ubiquinol: cytochrome c ₂ oxidoreductase - cyt b _H cytochrome b-561 or higher potential cytochrome b - cyt b _L cytochrome b-566, or low potential cytochrome b - cyt c ₁, cyt c ₂, cyt c _t cytochromes c ₁ and c ₂, and total cytochrome c (cyt c ₁ and cyt c ₂) - Fe.S Rieske-type iron sulfur center, Q - QH₂ ubiquinone, ubiquinol - Q_z, Q_zH₂, Q_z ^– ubiquinone, ubiquinol, and semiquinone anion of ubiquinone, bound at quinol oxidizing site - Q_z-site ubiquinol oxidizing site (also called Q_o-(outside) - Q_o (Oxidizing) - Q_P (Positive proton potential) site) - Q_c-site uubiquinone reductase site (also called the Q_i-(inside) - Q_R (Reducing), or - Q_N (Negative proton potential) site) - UHDBT 5-(n-undecyl)-6-hydroxy-4,7-dioxobenzothiazol     

The IleL229 → Met mutation impairs the quinone binding to the QB-pocket in reaction centers of Rhodobacter sphaeroides

A spontaneous mutant (R/89) of photosynthetic purple bacterium Rhodobacter sphaeroides R-26 was selected for resistance to 200 M atrazin. It showed increased resistance to interquinone electron transfer inhibitors of o-phenanthroline (resistance factor, RF=20) in UQ_o reconstituted isolated reaction centers and terbutryne in reaction centers (RF=55) and in chromatophores (RF=85). The amino acid sequence of the Q_B binding protein of the photosynthetic reaction center (the L subunit) was determined by sequencing the corresponding pufL gene and a single mutation was found (Ile^L229 Met). The changed amino acid of the mutant strain is in van der Waals contact with the secondary quinone Q_B. The binding and redox properties of Q_B in the mutant were characterized by kinetic (charge recombination) and multiple turnover (cytochrome oxidation and semiquinone oscillation) assays of the reaction center. The free energy for stabilization of Q_AQ_B ^– with respect to Q_A ^–Q_B was G_AB=–60 meV and 0 meV in reaction centers and G_AB=–85 meV and –46 meV in chromatophores of R-26 and R/89 strains at pH 8, respectively. The dissociation constants of the quinone UQ_o and semiquinone UQ_o ^– in reaction centers from R-26 and R/89 showed significant and different pH dependence. The observed changes in binding and redox properties of quinones are interpreted in terms of differential effects (electrostatics and mesomerism) of mutation on the oxidized and reduced states of Q_B.Abbreviations BChl bacteriochlorophyll - Ile isoleucine - Met methionin - P primary donor - Q_A primary quinone acceptor - Q_B secondary quinone acceptor - RC reaction center protein - UQ_o 2,3-dimethoxy-5-methyl benzoquinone - UQ₁₀ ubiquinone 50 This work is dedicated to the memory of Randall Ross Stein (1954–1994) and is, in a small way, a testament to the impact which Randy's ideas have had on the development of the field of competitive herbicide binding.     

Orientation of reaction center complexes fromRhodobacter sphaeroides in proteoliposomes and the effect ofo-phenanthroline on electrogenesis during primary photochemical reaction

The orientation ofRhodobacter sphaeroides reaction center complexes (RC complexes) in proteoliposomal membranes was investigated by a direct electrometric method. Conditions were found that allow monitoring of only that RC complex fraction that is oriented with its donor side to the inner part of the proteoliposome. It is shown thato-phenanthroline, an inhibitor of electron transfer between primary (Q_A) and secondary (Q_B) quinone acceptors, can also inhibit the photoinduced Q_A reduction. The efficiency of this inhibition depends on the concentration of added ubiquinone. It is assumed that the laser flash-inducedo-phenanthroline inhibition of primary dipole (P-870⁺ · Q _A ^– ) formation is of a competitive nature.     

The sequence of electron carriers in the reaction of cytochromec oxidase with oxygen

Kinetic studies of the electron transfer processes performed by cytochrome oxidase have assigned rates of electron transfer between the metal centers involved in the oxidation of ferrocytochromec by molecular oxygen. Transient-state studies of the reaction with oxygen have led to the proposal of a sequence of carriers from cytochromec, to Cu_A, to cytochromea, and then to the binuclear (i.e., cytochromea ₃-Cu_B) center. Electron exchange rates between these centers agree with relative center-to-center distances as follows; cytochromec to Cu_A 5–7 Å, cytochromec to cytochromea 20–25 Å, Cu_A to cytochromea 14–16 Å and cytochromea to cytochrome a₃-Cu_B 8–10 Å. It is proposed that the step from cytochromea to the binuclear center is the key control point in the reaction and that this step is one of the major points of energy transduction in the reaction cycle.     

Mutational analysis of assembly and function of the iron-sulfur protein of the cytochromebc 1 complex inSaccharomyces cerevisiae

The iron-sulfur protein of the cytochromebc ₁ complex oxidizes ubiquinol at center P in the protonmotive Q cycle mechanism, transferring one electron to cytochromec ₁ and generating a low-potential ubisemiquinone anion which reduces the low-potential cytochromeb-566 heme group. In order to catalyze this divergent transfer of two reducing equivalents from ubiquinol, the iron-sulfur protein must be structurally integrated into the cytochromebc ₁ complex in a manner which facilitates electron transfer from the iron-sulfur cluster to cytochromec ₁ and generates a strongly reducing ubisemiquinone anion radical which is proximal to theb-566 heme group. This radical must also be sequestered from spurious reactivities with oxygen and other high-potential oxidants. Experimental approaches are described which are aimed at understanding how the iron-sulfur protein is inserted into center P, and how the iron-sulfur cluster is inserted into the apoprotein.     

Resistance of reaction centers from Rhodobacter sphaeroides against UV-B radiation. Effects on protein structure and electron transport

Inhibition of electron transport and damage to the protein subunits by ultraviolet-B (UV-B, 280–320 nm) radiation have been studied in isolated reaction centers of the non-sulfur purple bacterium Rhodobacter sphaeroides R26. UV-B irradiation results in the inhibition of charge separation as detected by the loss of the initial amplitude of absorbance change at 430 nm reflecting the formation of the P⁺(Q_AQ_B)^– state. In addition to this effect, the charge recombination accelerates and the damping of the semiquinone oscillation increases in the UV-B irradiated reaction centers. A further effect of UV-B is a 2 fold increase in the half- inhibitory concentration of o-phenanthroline. Some damage to the protein subunits of the RC is also observed as a consequence of UV-B irradiation. This effect is manifested as loss of the L, M and H subunits on Coomassie stained gels, but not accompanied with specific degradation products. The damaging effects of UV-B radiation enhanced in reaction centers where the quinone was semireduced (Q_B ^–) during UV-B irradiation, but decreased in reaction centers which lacked quinone at the Q_B binding site. In comparison with Photosystem II of green plant photosynthesis, the bacterial reaction center shows about 40 times lower sensitivity to UV-B radiation concerning the activity loss and 10 times lower sensitivity concerning the extent of reaction center protein damage. It is concluded that the main effect of UV-B radiation in the purple bacterial reaction center occurs at the Q_AQ_B quinone acceptor complex by decreasing the binding affinity of Q_B and shifting the electron equilibration from Q_AQ_B ^– to Q_A ^–Q_B. The inhibitory effect is likely to be caused by modification of the protein environment around the Q_B binding pocket and mediated by the semiquinone form of Q_B. The UV-resistance of the bacterial reaction center compared to Photosystem II indicates that either the Q_AQ_B acceptor complex, which is present in both types of reaction centers with similar structure and function, is much less susceptible to UV damage in purple bacteria, or, more likely, that Photosystem II contains UV-B targets which are more sensitive than its quinone complex.Abbreviations Bchl bacteriochlorophyll - P Bchl dimer - Q_A primary quinone electron acceptor - Q_B secondary quinone electron acceptor - RC reaction center - UV-B ultraviolet-B     

The Role of Various Domains of the Iron–Sulfur Protein in the Assembly and Activity of the Cytochromme bc 1 Complex of Yeast Mitochondria

Assembly studies in vitro of deletion mutants of the iron–sulfur protein into the cytochromebc ₁ complex revealed that mutants localized in the extramembranous regions of the proteinwere not assembled into the complex in contrast to the efficient assembly of mutants in themembrane-spanning region. Charged amino acids located in the extramembranous 1-4 loopand the 1 helix were mutated and expressed in yeast cells lacking the gene for the iron–sulfurprotein. Mutating the charged amino acid residues H124, E125, R146, K148, and D149 aswell as V132 and W152 resulted in loss of enzymatic activity due to the loss of iron–sulfurprotein suggesting that these amino acids are required to maintain protein stability. By contrast,no loss of iron–sulfur protein accompanied the 30–50% loss of bc ₁ complex activity in mutantsof three conserved alanine residues, A86, A90, and A92, suggesting that these residues maybe involved in the proposed movement of the flexible tether of the iron–sulfur proteinduring catalysis.     

DNA sequence analysis of the lamB gene from Klebsiella pneumoniae: implications for the topology and the pore functions in maltoporin.

Summary We have determined the sequence of the lamB gene from Klebsiella pneumoniae. It encodes the precursor to the LamB protein, a 429 amino acid polypeptide with maltoporin function. Comparison with the Escherichia coli LamB protein reveals a high degree of homology, with 325 residues strictly identical. The N-terminal third of the protein is the most conserved part of the molecule (1 change in the signal sequence, and 13 changes up to residue 146 of the mature protein). Differences between the two mature proteins are clustered mainly in six regions comprising residues 145–167, 173–187, 197–226, 237–300, 311–329, and 367–387 (K. pneumoniae LamB sequence). The most important changes were found in regions predicted by the two-dimensional model of LamB folding to form loops on the cell surface. In vivo maltose and maltodextrin transport properties of E. coli K 12 and K. pneumoniae strains were identical. However, none of the E. coli K12 LamB-specific phages was able to plaque onto K. pneumoniae. Native K. pneumoniae LamB protein forms highly stable trimers. The protein could be purified by affinity chromatography on starch-Sepharose as efficiently as the E. coli K12 LamB protein, indicating a conservation of the binding site for dextrins. However, none of the monoclonal antibodies directed against native E. coli K12 LamB protein recognized native purified K. pneumoniae LamB protein. These data indicate that most of the variability occurs within exposed regions of the protein and provide additional support for the proposed model of LamB folding. The fact that the N-terminal third of the protein is highly conserved is in agreement with the idea that it is part of, or constitutes, the pore domain located within the transmembranous channel and that it is not accessible from the cell surface.     

A proposed pathway of proton translocation through thebc complexes of mitochondria and chloroplasts

The cytochromebc complexes of the electron transport chain from a wide variety of organisms generate an electrochemical proton gradient which is used for the synthesis of ATP. Proton translocation studies with radiolabeled N,N-dicyclohexylcarbodiimide (DCCD), the well-established carboxyl-modifying reagent, inhibited proton-translocation 50–70% with minimal effect on electron transfer in the cytochromebc ₁ and cytochromebf complexes reconstituted into liposomes. Subsequent binding studies with cytochromebc ₁ and cytochromebf complexes indicate that DCCD specifically binds to the subunitb and subunitb ₆, respectively, in a time and concentration dependent manner. Further analyses of the results with cyanogen bromide and protease digestion suggest that the probable site of DCCD binding is aspartate 160 of yeast cytochromeb and aspartate 155 or glutamate 166 of spinach cytochromeb ₆. Moreover, similar inhibition of proton translocating activity and binding to cytochromeb and cytochromeb ₆ were noticed with N-cyclo-N-(4-dimethylamino-napthyl)carbodiimide (NCD-4), a fluorescent analogue of DCCD. The spin-label quenching experiments provide further evidence that the binding site for NCD-4 on helix cd of both cytochromeb and cytochromeb ₆ is localized near the surface of the membrane but shielded from the external medium.     

Random mutant generation and its utility in uncovering structural and functional features of cytochromeb inSaccharomyces cerevisiae

The generation of random mutations in the mitochondrial cytochromeb gene ofSaccharomyces cerevisiae has been used as a most fruitful means of identifying subregions that play a key role in thebc ₁ complex mechanism, best explained by the protonmotive Q cycle originally proposed by Peter Mitchell. Selection for center i and center o inhibitor resistance mutants, in particular, has yielded much information. The combined approaches of genetics and structural predictions have led to a two-dimensional folding model for cytochromeb that is most compatible with current knowledge of the protonmotive Q cycle. A three-dimensional model is emerging from studies of distant reversions of deficient mutants. Finally, interactions between cytochromeb and the other subunits of thebc ₁ complex, such as the iron-sulfur protein, can be affected by a single amino acid change.     

Identification of the polypeptides in the cytochromeb 6/f complex from spinach chloroplasts with redox-center-carrying subunits

An improved procedure for the isolation of the cytochromeb ₆/f complex from spinach chloroplasts is reported. With this preparation up to tenfold higher plastoquinol-plastocyanin oxidoreductase activities were observed. Like the complex obtained by our previous procedure, the complex prepared by the modified way consisted of five polypeptides with apparent molecular masses of 34, 33, 23, 20, and 17 kD, which we call Ia, Ib, II, III, and IV, respectively. In addition, one to three small components with molecular masses below 6 kD were now found to be present. These polypeptides can be extracted with acidic acetone. Cytochromef, cytochromeb ₆, and the Rieske Fe-S protein could be purified from the isolated complex and were shown to be represented by subunits Ia + Ib, II, and III, respectively. The heterogeneity of cytochromef is not understood at present. Estimations of the stoichiometry derived from relative staining intensities with Coomassie blue and amido black gave 1:1:1:1 for the subunits Ia + Ib/II/III/IV, which is interesting in of the presence of two cytochromesb ₆ per cytochromef. Cytochromef titrated as a single-electron acceptor with a pH-independent midpoint potential of +339 mV between pH 6.5 and 8.3, while cytochromeb ₆ was heterogeneous. With the assumption of two components present in equal amounts, two one-electron transitions withE _m(1)=–40 mV andE _m(2)=–172 at pH 6.5 were derived. Both midpoint potentials were pH-dependent.Abbreviation Tris tris(hydroxymethyl)aminomethane - SDS sodium dodecylsulfate - SDS-PAGE SDS polyacrylamide gel electrophoresis - MES 2-(N-morpholino)ethanesulfonic acid     

Reduction of QA in the dark: Another cause of fluorescence Fo increases by high temperatures in higher plants

Increases in the chlorophyll fluorescence F_o (dark level fluorescence) during heat treatments were studied in various higher plants. Besides the dissociation of light-harvesting chlorophyll a/b protein complexes from the reaction center complex of PS II and inactivation of PS II, dark reduction of Q_A via plastoquinone (PQ) seemed to be related to the F_o increase at high temperatures. In potato leaves or green tobacco cultured cells, a part of the F_o increase was quenched by light, reflecting light-induced oxidation of Q_A ^- which had been reduced in the dark at high temperatures. Appearance of the F_o increase due to Q_A reduction depended on the plant species, and the mechanisms for this are proposed. The reductants seemed to be already present and formed by very brief illumination of the leaves at high temperatures. A ndhB-less mutant of tobacco showed that complex I type NAD(P)H dehydrogenase is not involved in the heat-induced reduction of Q_A. Quite strong inhibition of the Q_A reduction by diphenyleneiodonium suggests that a flavoenzyme is one of the electron mediator to PQ from the reductant in the stroma. Reversibility of the heat-induced Q_A reduction suggests that an enzyme(s) involved is activated at high temperatures and mostly returns to an inactive form at room temperature (25 °C).This revised version was published online in October 2005 with corrections to the Cover Date.     

A further investigation of the cytochrome<Emphasis Type="Italic"> b</Emphasis><Subscript>5</Subscript>–cytochrome<Emphasis Type="Italic"> c</Emphasis> complex

The interaction of reduced rabbit cytochrome b₅ with reduced yeast iso-1 cytochrome c has been studied through the analysis of ¹H–¹⁵N HSQC spectra, of ¹⁵N longitudinal (R₁) and transverse (R₂) relaxation rates, and of the solvent exchange rates of protein backbone amides. For the first time, the adduct has been investigated also from the cytochrome c side. The analysis of the NMR data was integrated with docking calculations. The result is that cytochrome b₅ has two negative patches capable of interacting with a single positive surface area of cytochrome c. At low protein concentrations and in equimolar mixture, two different 1:1 adducts are formed. At high concentration and/or with excess cytochrome c, a 2:1 adduct is formed. All the species are in fast exchange on the scale of differences in chemical shift. By comparison with literature data, it appears that the structure of one 1:1 adduct changes with the origin or primary sequence of cytochrome b₅.Electronic Supplementary Material Supplementary material is available for this article if you access the article at . A link in the frame on the left on that page takes you directly to the supplementary material.Abbreviations HSQC heteronuclear single quantum correlation spectroscopy - MD molecular dynamics     

A perspective on Q-cycles

An examination is made of both the Q-cycle andb-cycle formulations of electron transfer and energy conservation in the cytochromebc ₁ complex. A working hypothesis for the complex is presented, based upon the Q-cycle notion of vectorial reaction sites, but incorporating theb-cycle feature of semiquinone movement between these sites.