Studies on the Photoreceptors for the Promotion and Inhibition of Flowering in Dark-Grown Seedlings of Pharbitis nil Choisy

Three-day-old etiolated seedlings of Pharbitis nil were exposedto red light for 10 min and sprayed with N⁶-benzyladenine beforetransfer to a 48-h inductive dark period, after which they weregrown under continuous white light. A second red irradiationpromoted flowering when given at the 5 and 24th hour of theinductive dark period but inhibited flowering at the 10 and15th hour. Far-red light inhibited flowering when given at anytime during the first 24 h of the dark period. Red/far-red reversibilitywas clearly observed at the 0, 5, 10 and 24th hour, but notat the 15th hour when both red and far-red lights completelyinhibited flowering. The action spectrum for the inhibition of flowering at the 15thhour of the inductive dark period had a sharply defined peakat 660 nm and closely resembled the absorption spectrum of theP_R form of phytochrome. The photoreceptors involved in thesephotoreactions are discussed. (Received June 10, 1983; Accepted July 6, 1983)     

Photoreversibility of flower initiation in Lemna perpusilla as affected by the light quality of the main light period

Reversible floral responses of Lemna perpusilla to red and far-redlights appeared only at the beginning of the inductive darkperiod when the 8 hr photoperiod consisted of white or red light.When blue or far-red light was given during the 8 hr photoperiod,the far-red given at the beginning of the dark period scarcelyinhibited flowering; red/far-red reversibility newly appearedat the middle of the dark period. This indicates that the photoregulationsystem in the flowering of L. perpusilla can be converted fromthe Pharbitis type to the Xanthium type by changing the lightquality of the main photoperiod from white or red to blue orto far-red, which is known to be effective for the so-calledhigh-energy photoreaction of photomorphogenesis. (Received July 2, 1975; )     

Light requirement,phytochrome and photoperiodic induction of flowering of Pharbitis nil Chois

For dark-grown seedlings of Pharbitis nil capacity to flower in response to a single inductive dark period was established by 24 h white, far-red (FR) or ruby-red (BCJ) light and by a skeleton photoperiod of 10 min red (R)-24 h dark-10 min R. FR alone was ineffective without a brief terminal (R) irradiation, confirming that the form of phytochrome immediately prior to darkness is a crucial factor for flowering in Pharbitis. The magnitude of the flowering response was significantly greater after 24 h FR or white light (WL) (at 18° C and 27° C) than after two brief skeleton R irradiations, but the increased flowering response was not attributable to photosynthetic CO₂ uptake because this could not be detected in seedlings exposed to 24 h WL at 18° C. Photophosphorylation could have contributed to the increased flowering response as photosystem I fluorescence was detectable in plants exposed to FR, BCJ, or WL, but there were large differences between flowering response and photosystem I capacity as indicated by fluorescence. We conclude that phytochrome plays a major role in photoresponses regulating flowering. There was no simple correlation between developmental changes, such as cotyledon expansion and chlorophyll formation during the 24-h irradiation period, and the capacity to flower in response to a following inductive dark period. Changes in plastid ultrastructure were considerable in light from fluorescent lamps and there was complete breakdown of the prolamellar body with or without lamellar stacking at 27 or 18° C, respectively, but plastid reorganization was minimal in FR-irradiated seedlings.Abbreviations BCJ irradiation from photographic ruby-red lamps - FR far-red light - P_fr far-red-absorbing from of phytochrome - P total phytochrome content - R red light - WL white light from fluorescent lamps     

The semidian rhythm in flowering response of Pharbitis nil in relation to dark period time measurement and to a circadian rhythm

When seedlings of Pharbitis nil Choisy, cv. Violet, are exposed to a single inductive dark period at 27°C, brief interruptions with red light (R) can be promotive after 2–3 h of darkness but increasingly inhibitory to flowering up to the 8–9th h of darkness. This rhythmic response to R interruptions can be advanced in phase by > 1 h when the preceding light period is interrupted with far-red (FR) 2 h before darkness (FR -2 h) or with FR – 15 h, whereas FR –8 h or FR–22 h retard the rhythm. These shifts in the R interruption rhythm are paralleled by equal shifts in the length of the dark period required for flowering. Brief FR interruptions of darkness displayed a similar rhythm which was also advanced by FR –2 h and retarded by FR –8 h. We conclude therefore that the semidian rhythm in the light, which we have previously described, continues through at least the first 12 h of darkness, is manifested in the R interruption rhythm, and determines the critical night length. A circadian rhythm with a marked effect on flowering was also identified, but several lines of evidence suggest that the circadian and semidian rhythms have independent additive effects on flowering and do not appear to show phase interaction.     

Dark reactions in the flowering ofLemna perpusilla 6746

Summary This study concerns the effects of red and far-red light on flowering in the short day plantLemna perpusilla 6746. The critical day length for maximum flowering was found to be 10 hours. Exposure to red light near the middle of the dark period inhibited flowering, and the time of maximum sensitivity to red light occurred 9 hours after the beginning of dark periods of either 14 or 17 hours. The inhibition by red light was not reversible by far-red light, which also inhibited flowering, especially when given early in the dark period. Flowering inhibited by exposure to far-red light at the beginning of the dark period could be restored by subsequent exposure to red light. It appears that two photoperiodic partial processes in some plants may be controlled by the red, far-red reversible pigment system.With 5 Figures in the Text     

The relationship between red and far-red light on flowering of the long-day plant, Lemna gibba

Lemna gibba, a long-day duckweed, can be induced to flower whenthe 10 hr white photoperiod is extended with red or far-redlight. The 10 hr red photoperiod is also effective in inducingflowering when followed by a far-red extension, but a red extensionis ineffective. When 2 hr of far-red light are given immediately after the 10hr red photoperiod, the following red as well as the far-redextension can induce flowering, indicating that the 2 hr far-redlight plays an important role as a starting factor for induction.This red or far-red extension is effectively replaced by a redbreak given at a proper time in the darkness which follows the2 hr far-red light as the starting factor. The effect of thered break in not cancelled by subsequent exposure to far-red,which synergistically promotes flowering. However, a red break given immediately after a proper periodof far-red extension further promotes flowering. The phase sensitiveto the red break coincides with that sensitive to the red breakgiven in darkness. The effect of the red break is reversed bysubsequent exposure to far-red, contrary to the effect of thered break in darkness. Using these results, relation between red and far-red lighton flowering in L. gibba is discussed. (Received July 17, 1971; )     

Die Wirkung von „Störlicht” auf die Blütenbildung von Sinapis alba L.

Summary The induction of flowering in mustard (Sinapis alba L.) was studied by means of night-breaks (Störlicht). The plants were cultivated under fully controlled conditions: 8000 Lux white light (mixed fluorescent and incandescent) 18°C, 80% relative humidity. Raised under our conditions in short days (8 hours of white light) mustard behaved as a quantitative long-day plant (Fig. 2). Flowering can be promoted by long-day treatment (Fig. 3). The long day (16 hours of white light) can be replaced by a short day plus a night-break. The highest effectiveness of the night-break is found near the middle of the dark period (Figs. 4, 5). —The spectral dependence of flower induction was studied with blue, green, yellow, red (Fig. 1) and far-red light using a 2-hour break near the middle of the dark period. The dose response curves (Fig. 6) and the action spectrum (Fig. 7) indicate a very strong effectiveness in the blue part of the spectrum, a small response in red and yellow light and no response at all in green and far-red light. The participation of phytochrome is indicated (Table 1), but no far-red reversibility could be detected (Table 2). Simultaneous irradiation with red and far-red light yielded significant enhancement effects (Fig. 8). In view of the strong shadowing in the leaves (Figs. 9, 10) these data are interpretable on the basis of phytochrome.     

Control of Flowering of Xanthium pensylvanicum by Red and Far-red Light

A study was made of the effects of various durations, intensities and combinations of red and far-red light interruptions on the flowering responses of Xanthium pensylvanicum Wallr. A dual response to treatments of far-red light was observed. In short dark periods, far-red light alone did not greatly affect flowering but was able to overcome the inhibition of flowering caused by red light. In dark periods longer than 15 hours, far-red inhibited flowering and added to rather than overcame the inhibition by red light. The dark period length required for far-red inhibition remained the same whether far-red was given at the start or at the eighth hour of darkness.

In 48-hour dark periods Xanthium showed 3 responses to additions of red and far-red light breaks: A) response to red light; B) response to far-red light; and C) response to red followed by far-red light. Red light given any time in the first 30 hours of darkness overcame the inhibitory effect of far-red light given at either the start or the eighth hour of darkness. Red light given later than the thirtieth hour did not overcome the far-red effect.

Approximately the same energy of red light was required to overcome the inhibitory effect of far-red at the second hour of darkness as was required to produce maximum red light inhibition at the eighth hour. Although far-red light was most inhibitory when given early in a long dark period, approximately the same energy of far-red light was required to saturate the far-red response at the fourth, eighth and sixteenth hours.

The results are discussed in relation to other reports of far-red inhibition of flowering in short-day plants.

     

Growth and Dormancy in Lunularia cruciata (L.) Dum: VI. GROWTH REGULATION BY DAYLENGTH, BY RED, FAR-RED, AND BLUE LIGHT, AND BY APPLIED GROWTH REGULATORS AND CHELATING AGENTS

Experiments with photoperiods ranging from 2 to 24 h confirmthat 8 h light per day is optimal for Lunularia: there is nogrowth in the dark or in continuous light, which causes therapid onset of dormancy. Short-day cycles intercalated amonga series of continuous light cycles promote growth; in cycleslonger than 24 h very long dark periods are detrimental. Withvery short photoperiods (5 min) red light promotes growth moreeffectively than white light at higher intensity; far-red actsas dark. The growth effects of red and far-red light breaks(3 min) depended on the time of application; red light inhibitedin the middle but promoted at the beginning of the 16-h darkperiod of a short day; far-red light had the opposite effect;in each case red and far-red effects were reversible by theother wavelength. Blue light gave the same response as red includingthe reversibility of far-red effects and vice versa. Surprisingly,significant effects of 5 min red, blue, and far-red irradiationwere also found in the middle of the main high-intensity white-lightperiod, red and blue promoting growth, far-red reducing it;again there was ready reversibility of the effects. Growth promoters of higher plants are generally inhibitory toLunularia or have little effect; among growth retardants TIBA,Phosphon D, and CCC gave a slight promotion of growth. EDTApromoted growth (cell numbers) very significantly while 8-hydroxyquinolinewas initially inhibitory, but had a marked latent promotingeffect when subsequently washed from the thalli.     

Effect of Low-intensity Red and Far-red Light and High-intensity White Light on the Flowering Response of the Long-day Plant Lemna gibba G3

The long-day plant Lemna gibba L., strain G3 exhibits a relatively low sensitivity to short, white-light interruptions given during the dark period of a short-day cycle. However, the plants are fairly sensitive to low-intensity red light treatments given during a 15-hour dark period on the third day of a 2LD-(9L:15D)-2LD-7SD schedule. Far-red light is almost as effective as red light, and attempts to reverse the red light response with subsequent far-red light treatments have not been successful. Blue light proved to be without effect. When plants were grown on a 48-hour cycle with 15 minutes of red light every 4 hours during the dark period, the critical daylength was reduced from about 32 hours to slightly less than 12 hours.

Continuous red light induced a fairly good flowering response. However, as little as 1 hour of white light each day gave a significant improvement in the flowering response over that of the continuous red light control. White light of 600 to 700 ft-c was more effective than white light of 60 to 70 ft-c. The white light was much more effective when divided into 2 equal exposures given 8 to 12 hours apart. These results suggest an increase in light sensitivity with regard to flower induction about 8 to 10 hours after the start of the light period.

     

Flowering responses to light-breaks in photomorphogenic mutants of Arabidopsis thaliana, a long-day plant

Flowering response and plant form of photomorphogenic mutants (hy1, hy2, hy3, hy4 and hy5) of Arabidopsis thaliana (L.), a long-day plant, were examined in long and short days. There were only slight differences among genotypes including Landsberg wild type with respect to the flowering time under long days. The effect of 1 h light-(night)-breaks of far-red, red, blue and white light given in the middle of the dark period of plants grown under short days, was studied. Effects of far-red light applied at the end or the beginning of the main photoperiod on flowering and plant form were also examined. The light-breaks with all the above mentioned light qualities promoted floral initiation of all the genotypes including the wild type in terms of both the flowering time and the number of rosette leaves. In general, far-red light was most effective. It is possible to classify the hy-mutants into 3 groups by their responses to light-breaks under short day conditions: (a) Mutants hy2 and hy3, which have a reduced number of rosette leaves, and flower early. Red light is as effective as far-red light. The wavelength of light-breaks is relatively unimportant for flowering response. (b) Mutants hy4, hy5 and Landsberg wild type, which have a greater number of rosette leaves, and flower relatively late. The effectiveness of light-breaks is in the following order, far-red, blue, and red light, which is in reverse order to the transformation of phytochrome to the P_fr form. (c) Mutant hy1, which behaves anomalously with respect to relations between flowering time and number of rosette leaves; late flowering with reduced number of rosette leaves. Red, blue and far-red light are effective, but white light is ineffective for reducing the number of rosette leaves. When far-red light was given in the middle of the night or at the end of the main photoperiod, it markedly reduced the number of rosette leaves compared to those grown under short days for all the genotypes, while when applied at the beginning of the main photoperiod far-red light did not affect the number of rosette leaves. Different effects on the plant form dependent on the time of treatment with far-red light-breaks are also discussed.     

Flowering in Pisum: the Effect of Light Quality on the Genotype If e Sn Hr

Far-red light, when given as a 16 h photoperiod extension, iamore effective than red light in reducing the flowering nodeof genotype Pisum. In contrast, when a 16 h dark period is interruptedby a 2 h light break red light is more effective than far-redlight. In addition, the stimulatory effect of a red interruptionis partially reversed by a subsequent period of far-red. However,a light interruption is not effective until over 12 h have elapsedsince the start of the previous photoperiod, regardless of whetherthe photoperiod was of 4 or 8 h duration. The results suggest that there are two light-dependent reactionscontrolling flowering in peas, one operating through the phytochromesystem with high levels of Pfr suppressing production of flowerinhibitor by the sn gene and a second requiring continuous illuminationwith wavelengths above 700 nm. The role of time measurementin the photoperiod response in peas is suggested to be filledby the proportion of time the Sn gene is effectively producinginhibitor. The photoperiod response in peas is not independentof temperature or plant age since the activity of gene Sn isalso varied by these factors.     

Opposite response groups of short-day plants to the spectral composition of the main light period and to end-of-day red or far-red irradiations

Two response groups were found among short-day plants grownin blue green-houses having a high or low far-red admixture.In one group flowering was promoted by low far-red and delayedby high far-red; the other group reacted in an opposite manner.In plants grown under 8-hr day and 16-hr night regimes, floweringin the low far-red group was promoted by red and inhibited byfar-red illumination preceding the 16-hr nights; in the highfar-red group flowering was promoted by far-red and inhibitedby red illumination preceding the dark periods. In both groupsflowering was inhibited by red light applied in the middle ofthe dark period. (Received March 18, 1974; )     

Mechanisms of resistance to the brown planthopperNilaparvata lugens in wild rice (Oryza spp.) cultivars

Three wild rice species and six cultivated rice varieties were evaluated to determine their mechanisms of resistance toNilaparvata lugens (Stal.). Wild rice species,Oryza officinalis, O. punctata, andO. latifolia and cultivated rices Rathu Heenati (Bph 3), Babawee (bph 4), ARC 10 550 (bph 5), Swarnalata (Bph 6), Ptb 33 (bph 2+Bph 3) and the susceptible Taichung Native (TN 1) (no resistance gene) were included in the study. In a free choice seedbox screening test, wild rice species maintained their high level of resistance through the 48 h exposure toN. lugens nymphs while plant damage ratings of cultivated rice varieties increased with time. Wild rices were non preferred and significantly more individuals settled on susceptible TN 1 followed by cultivated rices. The quantity of food ingested and assimilated byN. lugens on wild rices was less than on cultivated resistant varieties.N. lugens caged on resistant wild rices had slow nymphal development, reduced longevity, low fecundity, and low egg hatchability as compared toN. lugens on cultivated resistant varieties.     

Capacity of cytochrome and alternative path in coupled and uncoupled root respiration of Pisum and Plantago

A critical duration of darkness must be exceeded for the photoperiodic induction of flowering in short-day plants. This requires detection of the light/dark transition at dusk and the coupling of this information to a time-measuring system.
Lowering the P_fr/P_tot, ratio photochemically at the end of the day did not accelerate the onset of dark timing in Pharbitis nil Choisy cv. Violet. Time-measurement was initiated when, with no change in spectral quality, the irradiance fell below a threshold value. Thus, if the light/dark transition at dusk is sensed by a reduction in P_fr, this reduction can be achieved as rapidly through thermal reactions as through photochemical ones. When given at hourly intervals during a 6-h extension of a 24-h main light period in white light, pulses of red light were as effective as continuous red light in delaying the onset of timing; pulses every 2 or 3 h were less effective. The effectiveness of intermittent red light indicates that phytochrome is the photoreceptor and the requirement for frequent exposures suggests that P_fr is lost rapidly in the dark. However, the red light pulses could not be reversed by far-red light, which argues against this hypothesis. An alternative explanation is that the perception of light as being continuous occurs only when "new" P_fr is regenerated sufficiently frequently.
The nature of the coupling of the dusk signal to the time-measuring system is discussed and it is suggested that the effect of each red light pulse is to delay the phase of the photoperiodic rhythm by 1–3 h.     

The characteristics of light in floral induction in vitro of Cichorium intybus. The possible role of phytochrome

The action of light in the initiation of floral buds in vitro has been studied using monochromatic light qualities on root explants of a long day plant, Cichorium intybus L. cv. Witloof. Red light (660 nm, 0.30 W m^-2) promotes flowering, while far-red (730 nm, 0.31 W m^-2) and irradiation with combined red + far-red (0.20 + 0.41 W m^-2) have no effect. In short day conditions floral response can be obtained in two ways: 1) by interrupting the dark period with 5 brief irradiations of red light (0.45 W m^-2, 12 min) at regular intervals, although these are counteracted by far-red irradiations of equal intensity and duration; 2) by interrupting the long night with 5 h red light applied during the second third of the night, while at the beginning or at the end it is ineffective. Red light efficiency appears to depend on the photosynthetic activity of the tissues, so that flowering increases with increasing intensity of white light and is suppressed if no white light is supplied. The reproductive development is determined by the coordination of proper irradiation conditions with sufficient sensitivity of the perceiving meristematic cells. The period of highest sensitivity to environmental light conditions in the life cycle of a Cichorium root explant occurs between the 8th and the 16th day after the start of the culture. The data strongly suggest that phytochrome is involved in flower induction of Cichorium in vitro.     

PHOTOPERIODIC ADAPTATIONS IN EUPATORIUM RUGOSUM

Racial differences based on flowering response to several photoperiods were detectable in two widely separated populations of white snakeroot, Eupatorium rugosum Houtt. The most favorable photoperiod for advanced flowering in Georgia stocks was 12 hr, for those from North Dakota, 14 hr. The difference in latitude between these populations was approximately 12° and represents a mean difference of 75 days in the frost-free season. Under noninductive photoperiod a 1-hr interruption of white light in the middle of 15 hr of darkness stimulated floral initiation in North Dakota plants, whereas the same application at the beginning or at the end of the dark period failed to produce flower buds. The effect of red light (660 mμ) for 10 min given in the middle of the long night was similar to white light on the northern strain, and was negated by far-red (730 mμ). Georgia stocks initiated flowering under 15 hr of darkness but were retarded by white light applied in the middle of the period, thus differing in basic response from North Dakota plants. Red light, in contrast to effects observed in North Dakota plants, retarded initiation of flower buds. This effect was offset by far-red light. When compared with other studies on long-day and short-day species our results suggest that photoperiodic adaptations related to latitudinal distribution occur in white snakeroot. The North Dakota strain showed correspondence to long-day types while short-day tendencies were exhibited by Georgia plants.     

Circadian rhythms and the induction of flowering in the long-day grass Lolium temulentum L.

Plants of Lolium temulentum L. strain Ceres were grown in 8-h short day (SD) for 45 d before being exposed either to a single long day (LD) or to a single 8-h SD given during an extended dark period. For LD induction, the critical photoperiod was between 12 and 14 h, and more than 16 h were needed for a maximal flowering response. During exposure to a single 24-h LD, the translocation of the floral stimulus began between the fourteenth and the sixteenth hours after the start of the light period, and was completed by the twenty-fourth hour. Full flowering was also induced by one 8-h SD beginning 4 or 28 h after the start of a 40-h dark period, i.e. by shifting 12 h forward or beyond the usual SD. The effectiveness of a so-called ‘displaced short day’ (DSD) was not affected by light quality and light intensity. With a mixture of incandescent and fluorescent lights at a total photosynthetic photon flux density of 400 μmol m⁻² s⁻¹, a 4-h light exposure beginning 4 h after the start of a 40-h dark period was sufficient to induce 100% flowering. The flower-inducing effect of a single 8-h DSD was also assessed during a 64-h dark period. Results revealed two maxima at a 20-h interval. This fluctuation in light sensitivity suggests that a circadian rhythm is involved in the control of flowering of L. temulentum.     

Evidence of phytochrome involvement in the entrainment of the circadian rhythm of carbon dioxide metabolism in Bryophyllum

The rhythm of carbon dioxide output in Bryophyllum leaves was entrained on exposure to 0.25 h of white light every 24 h. Entrainment also occurred on similar exposure to monochromatic radiation in spectral bands centred at 660 nm and, to a lesser extent, at 730 nm, but a band centred at 450 nm was without effect. A skeleton irradiation programme comprising two 0.25-h exposures to white light per 24 h also entrained the rhythm when the intervening dark periods were either 7.5 h and 16 h, or 10.5 h and 13 h. The rhythm disappeared when the two exposures were separated by 11.5-h and 12-h dark periods. Regular 0.25-h exposures to red light separated by 11.75-h periods of darkness also resulted in loss of the rhythm. Red/far-red reversibility was observed in irradiation schedules having either one or two exposures to red light daily. In the latter case, far-red reversal of the effects of one of the exposures to red light resulted in entrainment of the rhythm by the other, instead of abolition of the rhythm. The occurrence of distinct red/far-red reversibility suggests strongly that phytochrome is the pigment involved in entrainment of this rhythm by cycles of light and darkness.Abbreviation LD light-dark rhythm     

Floral initiation in Lolium temulentum L.: the role of phytochrome in the responses to red and far-red light

Summary The possibility that phytochrome is involved in the promotion of flowering by far-red light was investigated. The addition of far-red (FR) to a day extension with red (R) light promotes inflorescence initiation in Lolium. A 2-hour interruption with darkness also promoted flowering compared with the uninterrupted red light control; apex length was further increased by a 10-minute FR irradiation given before the 2-hour dark interruption and was decreased by 10-minutes of R light given in the middle: both FR promotion and R inhibition were reversed by R and FR respectively. Apex length increased approximately linearly with increasing duration of dark interruption up to at least 2 1/2 hours. When varying ratios of R:FR light were substituted for a 2-hour dark period, apex length was increasingly depressed as the % R was increased above 25%; no difference between 25% R/75% FR and 100% FR could be detected. Apex length was inversely linearly related to the calculated [Pfr]/[P] ratios above about 40% Pfr.FR promoted flowering when given during a 5-hour interruption of a day extension with R light but, between 0.25 and 0.90 J m² s^-1, there was no effect of intensity of FR; at 0.11 J m^-2 s^-1 apex length was shorter than at 0.25 J m^-2 s^-1 but longer than in darkness. When the duration of FR (from the beginning of a dark interruption of a day extension with R) was varied, apex length increased with increasing duration of FR up to 1 1/4 to 2 hours but further increasing the duration of FR did not promote flowering more.The results implicate phytochrome in the promotion of flowering by FR light. It has been demonstrated that a low [Pfr]/[P] ratio (less than present in 25% R/75% FR) is needed over a relatively long period of time: this explains why a relatively high proportion of FR light must be added to R for several hours in order to give maximum promotion of flowering. It is concluded that, in Lolium, the increased flowering response to FR light is brought about by a reduction of [Pfr]/[P] ratio at the appropriate time, although the possibility that another effect of far-red is also involved has not been rigorously excluded.