独脚金内酯调控植物侧枝发育的分子机制及其与生长素交互作用的研究进展

对独脚金内酯（strigolactones,SLs）调控植物侧枝发育的分子机制及其与生长素相互作用的相关研究结果进行了总结和归纳,在此基础上提出今后的重点研究方向。相关的研究结果显示：在拟南芥[Arabidops~thaliana（Linn．）Heynh．]、豌豆（Pisum sativum Linn．）和水稻（Oryza sativa Linn．）等植物多枝突变体中SLs作为可转导信号参与侧枝发育的分子调控,从这些植物中已克隆获得参与SLs生物合成及信号应答途径的一些基因。作为一种植物激素,SLs在侧枝发育调控网络中与生长素相互作用;腋芽发育与其中生长素的输出密切相关,SLs通过调控芽中生长素的输出间接抑制腋芽发育和侧枝生长,而生长素则在SLs生物合成中起调节作用。     

Concepts and terminology of apical dominance

Apical dominance is the control exerted by the shoot apex over lateral bud outgrowth. The concepts and terminology associated with apical dominance as used by various plant scientists sometimes differ, which may lead to significant misconceptions. Apical dominance and its release may be divided into four developmental stages: (I) lateral bud formation, (II) imposition of inhibition on lateral bud growth, (III) release of apical dominance following decapitation, and (IV) branch shoot development. Particular emphasis is given to discriminating between Stage III, which is accompanied by initial bud outgrowth during the first few hours of release and may be promoted by cytokinin and inhibited by auxin, and Stage IV, which is accompanied by subsequent bud outgrowth occurring days or weeks after decapitation and which may be promoted by auxin and gibberellin. The importance of not interpreting data measured in Stage IV on the basis of conditions and processes occurring in Stage III is discussed as well as the correlation between degree of branching and endogenous auxin content, branching mutants, the quantification of apical dominance in various species (including Arabidopsis ), and apical control in trees.     

Cytokinin/Auxin Control of Apical Dominance in Ipomoea nil

Although the concept of apical dominance control by the ratioof cytokinin to auxin is not new, recent experimentation withtransgenic plants has given this concept renewed attention.In the present study, it has been demonstrated that cytokinintreatments can partially reverse the inhibitory effect of auxinon lateral bud outgrowth in intact shoots of Ipomoea nil. Althoughless conclusive, this also appeared to occur in buds of isolatednodes. Auxin inhibited lateral bud outgrowth when applied eitherto the top of the stump of the decapitated shoot or directlyto the bud itself. However, the fact that cytokinin promotiveeffects on bud outgrowth are known to occur when cytokinin isapplied directly to the bud suggests different transport tissuesand/or sites of action for the two hormones. Cytokinin antagonistswere shown in some experiments to have a synergistic effectwith benzyladenine on the promotion of bud outgrowth. If theratio of cytokinin to auxin does control apical dominance, thenthe next critical question is how do these hormones interactin this correlative process? The hypothesis that shoot-derivedauxin inhibits lateral bud outgrowth indirectly by depletingcytokinin content in the shoots via inhibition of its productionin the roots was not supported in the present study which demonstratedthat the repressibility of lateral bud outgrowth by auxin treatmentsat various positions on the shoot was not correlated with proximityto the roots but rather with proximity to the buds. Resultsalso suggested that auxin in subtending mature leaves as wellas that in the shoot apex and adjacent small leaves may contributeto the apical dominance of a shoot. (Received September 24, 1996; Accepted March 16, 1997)     

AXR1 acts after lateral bud formation to inhibit lateral bud growth in Arabidopsis

The AXR1 gene of Arabidopsis is required for many auxin responses. The highly branched shoot phenotype of mature axr1 mutant plants has been taken as genetic evidence for a role of auxin in the control of shoot branching. We compared the development of lateral shoots in wild-type Columbia and axr1-12 plants. In the wild type, the pattern of lateral shoot development depends on the developmental stage of the plant. During prolonged vegetative growth, axillary shoots arise and develop in a basal-apical sequence. After floral transition, axillary shoots arise rapidly along the primary shoot axis and grow out to form lateral inflorescences in an apical-basal sequence. For both patterns, the axr1 mutation does not affect the timing of axillary meristem formation; however, subsequent lateral shoot development proceeds more rapidly in axr1 plants. The outgrowth of lateral inflorescences from excised cauline nodes of wild-type plants is inhibited by apical auxin. axr1-12 nodes are resistant to this inhibition. These results provide evidence for common control of axillary growth in both patterns, and suggest a role for auxin during the late stages of axillary shoot development following the formation of the axillary bud and several axillary leaf primordia.     

Growth Regulators in Populus tremula IV. Apical Dominance and Suckering in Young Plants

Experiments with small plants of Populus tremula L. growing in solution culture indicate that polarly transported auxin is an important factor in the control of axillary bud growth. If the auxin supply from the growing apex is eliminated, the number of buds released is influenced by factors translocated in the transpiration stream from the roots. Suckers may be induced to develop from aspen roots, the age of which is six weeks or more. Removal of the growing apex and the axillary buds or stoppage of shoot growth by short day treatment were effective in inducing abundant suckering in small aspen plants. Some mature leaves had to be maintained, indicating the dependence of sucker formation on carbohydrate supply. These treatments are known to decrease auxin production in the shoots. Extraction and biological assay showed a decrease in the content of auxin in the roots as a consequence of removal of growing shoot parts. The results indicate that suckering in roots of intact aspen plants is prevented by auxin transported into the roots from growing shoot parts.     

Regulation of shoot branching by auxin

The idea that apically derived auxin inhibits shoot branching by inhibiting the activity of axillary buds was first proposed 70 years ago, but it soon became clear that its mechanism of action was complex and indirect. Recent advances in the study of axillary bud development and of auxin signal transduction are allowing a better understanding of the role of auxin in controlling shoot branching. These studies have identified a new role for auxin early in bud development as well as some of the second messengers involved in mediating the branch-inhibiting effects of auxin.     

The Arabidopsis MAX pathway controls shoot branching by regulating auxin transport

BACKGROUND: Plants achieve remarkable plasticity in shoot system architecture by regulating the activity of secondary shoot meristems, laid down in the axil of each leaf. Axillary meristem activity, and hence shoot branching, is regulated by a network of interacting hormonal signals that move through the plant. Among these, auxin, moving down the plant in the main stem, indirectly inhibits axillary bud outgrowth, and an as yet undefined hormone, the synthesis of which in Arabidopsis requires MAX1, MAX3, and MAX4, moves up the plant and also inhibits shoot branching. Since the axillary buds of max4 mutants are resistant to the inhibitory effects of apically supplied auxin, auxin and the MAX-dependent hormone must interact to inhibit branching. RESULTS: Here we show that the resistance of max mutant buds to apically supplied auxin is largely independent of the known, AXR1-mediated, auxin signal transduction pathway. Instead, it is caused by increased capacity for auxin transport in max primary stems, which show increased expression of PIN auxin efflux facilitators. The max phenotype is dependent on PIN1 activity, but it is independent of flavonoids, which are known regulators of PIN-dependent auxin transport. CONCLUSIONS: The MAX-dependent hormone is a novel regulator of auxin transport. Modulation of auxin transport in the stem is sufficient to regulate bud outgrowth, independent of AXR1-mediated auxin signaling. We therefore propose an additional mechanism for long-range signaling by auxin in which bud growth is regulated by competition between auxin sources for auxin transport capacity in the primary stem.     

Hormones and Apical Dominance in the Fern Davallia

Lateral buds of the fern Davallia trichomanoides are releasedfrom inhibition by the removal of the main shoot apex. However,auxin is not capable of substituting for the apex in decapitatedshoots nor can auxin in shoot tips be detected by bioassay orextraction and chromatography. Expanding leaves of this speciescontain auxin, but these organs are not responsible for inhibitionof lateral bud growth. The response of lateral buds to an exogenouslyapplied cytokinin does not result in initial bud break. It isconcluded that the hormonal factors known to govern apical dominancein seed plants are not responsible for the regulation of differentialbud expansion in this fern.     

Changes in the water status and rheological characteristics of pea seedling axillary buds during their transitions growth-dormancy-growth in apical dominance

The technique of isopiestic thermocouple psychrometry was used for the analysis of bud transition from dormancy to growth and back in 8-18-day-old pea (Pisum sativum L.) seedlings. We monitored changes in the water (ψ_w) and osmotic (ψ_{s + m}) potentials and also turgor pressure (ψ_p) in dormant buds and threshold turgor (Y) in growing buds, the latter being one of the cell-wall rheological characteristics. Seedling decapitation resulted in a decrease of Y in the bud, which coincided with the start of its outgrowth. The replacement of terminal shoot with exogenous auxin (IAA or NAA) retarded bud outgrowth and maintained the high level of Y, which argues for the auxin control of this parameter. When growth of the first axillary bud was inhibited by the second one, positioned higher and remained on the plant, the beginning of Y increase preceded visible correlative growth suppression; this makes this rheological index an early marker of bud transition from growth to dormancy. The effects of the terminal shoot part and auxin application on the bud osmotic status differed substantially. In fact, bud transition to dormancy in the presence of the terminal shoot, the main or developing from the second axillary bud, was accompanied by the rise in ψ_{s + m}, whereas, in the case of the replacement of the second bud with exogenous auxin, the first bud growth suppression occurred with the decrease in ψ_{s + m}. The low value of the bud ψ_{s + m} is a factor for creating a considerable gradient of the water potential between the stem and bud supporting water transport to the bud, which was much more active than in plants with a terminal shoot. It seems likely that this is the reason for the absence of complete growth suppression observed by us and other researchers even after application of high auxin concentrations. Immediately after seedling decapitation, ψ_{s + m} in the buds reduced; however, this was not the result of trophic metabolite redistribution due to the loss of their active sink because ψ_{s + m} reduced also in experiments with complete isolation of the bud releasing from dormancy in the chamber at 100% humidity. Auxin application to the cut surface of decapitated seedlings did not affect the ψ_{s + m} decrease. Like decapitation, cotyledon removal resulted in the increase in the bud turgor pressure. However, in this case, water stress did not change the bud osmotic status. Thus, the induction of osmotica accumulation in the bud after the removal of the terminal shoot is evidently related to neither trophic, nor auxin, nor hydraulic signal. The data obtained allowed us to conclude that both components of the bud water potential—ψ_{s + m} and Y—play an important role in the control of bud growth at apical dominance. Auxin produced in the shoot apex is involved in the control of Y, whereas the nature of the signal controlling the ψ_{s + m} level is unclear.     

The gravity-regulated growth of axillary buds is mediated by a mechanism different from decapitation-induced release

When the upper part of the main shoot of the Japanese morning glory (Pharbitis nil or Ipomoea nil) is bent down, the axillary bud situated on the uppermost node of the bending region is released from apical dominance and elongates. Here, we demonstrate that this release of axillary buds from apical dominance is gravity regulated. We utilized two agravitropic mutants of morning glory defective in gravisensing cell differentiation, weeping (we) and weeping2 (we2). Bending the main shoots of either we or we2 plants resulted in minimal elongation of their axillary buds. This aberration was genetically linked to the agravitropism phenotype of the mutants, which implied that shoot bending-induced release from apical dominance required gravisensing cells. Previous studies have shown that basipetal translocation of auxin from the apical bud inhibits axillary bud growth, whereas cytokinin promotes axillary bud outgrowth. We therefore compared the roles of auxin and cytokinin in bending- or decapitation-induced axillary bud growth. In the wild-type and we plants, decapitation increased cytokinin levels and reduced auxin response. In contrast, shoot bending did not cause significant changes in either cytokinin level or auxin response, suggesting that the mechanisms underlying gravity- and decapitation-regulated release from apical dominance are distinct and unique.     

Auxin–cytokinin interactions in the control of shoot branching

In many plant species, the intact main shoot apex grows predominantly and axillary bud outgrowth is inhibited. This phenomenon is called apical dominance, and has been analyzed for over 70 years. Decapitation of the shoot apex releases the axillary buds from their dormancy and they begin to grow out. Auxin derived from an intact shoot apex suppresses axillary bud outgrowth, whereas cytokinin induced by decapitation of the shoot apex stimulates axillary bud outgrowth. Here we describe the molecular mechanisms of the interactions between auxin and cytokinin in the control of shoot branching.     

Regeneration in Streptocarpus Leaf Discs and its Regulation by Temperature and Growth Substances

The formation of adventitious buds and roots in leaf discs of Streptocarpus x bybridus‘Constant Nymph’ were both stimulated by relatively low temperatures (12 and 18°C) applied to isolated discs or to the growing plants before leaf harvest. Auxins also promoted both bud and root formation, the optimum concentration for rooting always being one to two orders of magnitude higher than the optimum for budding. Cytokinins had only a small stimulatory effect on bud formation. At higher concentrations it was inhibitory and even counteracted the stimulatory effect of auxin on bud formation. As usual, root formation was inhibited by cytokinin. GA₃ inhibited both bud and root formation but the inhibition was reversible by auxin. In presence of optimum auxin levels abscisic acid enhanced bud formation. It had little effect on root formation except for an inhibition at high concentrations. The effects of exogenous auxin and cytokinin suggest that Streptocarpus leaves have a high and non-limiting level of endogenous cytokinin with auxin as the limiting factor for both root and bud formation. This would also explain the exceptionally high regeneration ability of this plant.     

Does Auxin Play a Role in the Release of Apical Dominance by Shoot Inversion in Ipomoea nil?

According to the auxin-inhibition hypothesis of apical dominance,apically produced auxin moves down the stem and inhibits axillarybud outgrowth, either directly or indirectly. This hypothesishas been examined further by monitoring changes in basipetalauxin transport and endogenous auxin concentration in Ipomoeanil caused by shoot inversion, a stimulus that releases apicaldominance. The results indicate that inversion reduces auxintransport in the main stem. In upright shoots of intact plants,a 16-h pretreatment with [³H]IAA 4 cm below the apex resultsin downward movement of label and accumulation in nodes, especiallythe cotyledonary node. Label does not accumulate in the lateralbuds. GC-MS determinations of endogenous free auxin level inthe fourth node, where a lateral bud grows out following inversionof the upper part of the shoot, show no changes at 3 and 8 hafter inversion, the range of times for inversion-induced budrelease, or at 24 h, when bud outgrowth is continuing. However,inversion did cause a just-detectable decrease (approx. 10%)in the IAA level of the shoot's elongation region. Althoughauxin transport in segments of the main stem is partially inhibitedby inversion over a period shorter than the latent time of budrelease, thus providing a means for the expected depletion ofauxin in the fourth node, no depletion could be detected there.These results suggest that either a decrease in IAA level inthe main stem is not causal of bud release or that the decreasedIAA pool responsible for bud release is compartmented and cannotbe measured in whole-tissue extracts.Copyright 1993, 1999 AcademicPress Apical dominance, auxin content, auxin transport, axillary bud release, GC-MS, Ipomoea nil, Pharbitis nil, shoot inversion     

Auxin, Cytokinin and Ethylene Differentially Regulate Specific Developmental States Associated with Shoot Bud Morphogenesis in Leaf Tissues of Mangosteen (Garcinia mangostana L.) Cultured in Vitro

Hormonal regulation of de novo shoot bud formation in leaf explantsof mangosteen has been studied from a developmental perspective.This analysis indicates that at least three discrete, experimentallydistinguishable developmental states, namely, morphogenic competence,caulogenic determination and organ differentiation, were expressedduring shoot bud morphogenesis. The state of morphogenic competencein leaf tissues was expressed maximally between days 10 and12 of leaf development. Competent cells in explants requireda minimum of 6 days of BA treatment (20 µM) to becomecaulogenically determined. Such determined cells would continueshoot organogenesis on medium devoid of growth regulators. Delayingof BA exposure for as short as 2 days caused a dramatic declinein tissue competence. The state of competence and the processof caulogenic determination were adversely affected by IAA,but were insensitive to ethylene or its precursor, ACC. Shootbud differentiation was greatly enhanced by BA, but selectivelydelayed by ethylene. IAA also showed an inhibitory effect onshoot bud differentiation, but not mediated through ethylene.The distinct roles of auxin, cytokinin and ethylene on the regulationof shoot bud development in mangosteen leaf explants have beendiscussed on the basis of the current understanding of the conceptof tissue competence, determination and differentiation. (Received August 12, 1996; Accepted October 31, 1996)     

生长素与乙烯在沙田柚上胚轴不定芽再生中的作用

结果表明,6 BA只能诱导较低频率的不定芽再生,IBA的加入可以促进不定芽的再生。从再生率与单位外植体再生芽数综合考虑,以高浓度IBA(1.5mg·L 1)与低浓度6 BA(0.5mg·L 1)配合的效果最佳,加入生长素极性运输的调节剂TIBA与Flavone可进一步提高不定芽的再生频率。乙烯抑制上胚轴不定芽的再生,而乙烯生理作用的拮抗剂Ag+与生物合成抑制剂AOA、Co+可以显著提高不定芽再生频率。水杨酸(SA)也抑制不定芽的再生。     

SCLEREID DISTRIBUTION IN THE LEAVES OF PSEUDOTSUGA UNDER NATURAL AND EXPERIMENTAL CONDITIONS

Al -talib , Khalil H., and John G. Torrey . (U. California, Berkeley.) Sclereid distribution in the leaves of Pseudotsuga under natural and experimental conditions. Amer. Jour. Bot. 48(1): 71–79. Illus. 1961.—A study of the distribution of sclereids in cleared leaves taken from 1-, 2-, and 4-year-old shoots of an adult tree of Pseudotsuga menziesii (Mirb.) Franco showed a repeated pattern of sclereid distribution along the shoot axis with many sclereids in the basal leaves grading into few or no sclereids in the terminal leaves of each year's growth. Attempts were made to influence sclereid distribution by bud defoliation of attached branches with and without auxin treatment and by testing the effects of growth-regulating substances on sclereid formation in leaves of excised buds of Pseudotsuga cultured in vitro. Whereas removal of the basal ¾ of the leaves at the time of bud unfolding had no effect on bud, leaf or sclereid development, removal of the leaves of the upper half or complete defoliation led to premature expansion of next year's terminal bud with leaves developing in part from presumptive bud-scale primordia. Indoleacetic acid at 0.5% in lanolin paste applied to the defoliated region prevented this premature bud expansion. Defoliation of the basal half did not affect sclereid formation in the terminal leaves. Sclereid development in leaves of prematurely expanded buds on defoliated branches was normal except in the few cases where bud expansion occurred in the presence of low-auxin concentrations. Then, sclereid development was inhibited. Sclereid formation in leaves of excised buds grown in nutrient culture was generally much less frequent than in intact branches, and auxin treatment still further reduced the frequency of sclereids. It was concluded that sclereid initiation and differentiation in the intact plant may well be under the control of hormonal factors in the plant, one of which may be auxin.     

Efficient shoot regeneration from internodal explants of Populus angustifolia, Populus balsamifera and Populus deltoids

In the present study, interactions between the duration of treatment with auxin and different cytokinins and their effect on shoot regeneration were evaluated with the aim to establish a rapid and efficient in vitro regeneration method applicable to a variety of Populus species. Three different species, Populus angustifolia, P. balsamifera, and P. deltoids, were chosen for that purpose. We were successful in regenerating plantlets from stem and petiole explants from all three chosen species using a four-step simple procedure. The first step was callus induction when the explants were exposed to an auxin-rich medium for 0-20 days. During the second step, they were transferred onto a cytokinin-rich medium for shoot bud induction. In the third step, the shoots regenerated were transferred onto a medium with reduced levels of cytokinins to promote shoot proliferation and elongation; finally, in the fourth step, the shoots were rooted and acclimated. A short period (6-10 days) of time of exposure to auxin was sufficient for shoot regeneration. A culture time longer than ten days in callus induction medium drastically reduced the efficiency of shoot regeneration. Besides, cytokinin type and concentration also affected the frequency of shoot induction. A 0.2 mg/l concentration of 2,4-D for callus induction followed by 0.02 mg/l of Thidiazuron for shoot formation proved to be the best treatment for adventitious shoot bud multiplication, generating a maximum of 10-13 shoots of P. balsamifera and P. angustifolia in ten weeks. In contrast, for P. deltoids, a combination of 1.1mg/l 2,4-D, 1.0mg/l NAA, 0.1mg/l zeatin for callus induction followed by a combination of 1mg/l zeatin plus 1.0mg/l BA for shoot bud induction was found to be the most effective, generating on average 15 shoots over a period of ten weeks.     

Shoot bending promotes flower bud formation by miRNA‐mediated regulation in apple (Malus domestica Borkh.)

Flower induction in apple (Malus domestica Borkh.) trees plays an important life cycle role, but young trees produce fewer and inferior quality flower buds. Therefore, shoot bending has become an important cultural practice, significantly promoting the capacity to develop more flower buds during the growing seasons. Additionally, microRNAs (miRNAs) play essential roles in plant growth, flower induction and stress responses. In this study, we identified miRNAs potentially involved in the regulation of bud growth, and flower induction and development, as well as in the response to shoot bending. Of the 195 miRNAs identified, 137 were novel miRNAs. The miRNA expression profiles revealed that the expression levels of 68 and 27 known miRNAs were down‐regulated and up‐regulated, respectively, in response to shoot bending, and that the 31 differentially expressed novel miRNAs between them formed five major clusters. Additionally, a complex regulatory network associated with auxin, cytokinin, abscisic acid (ABA) and gibberellic acid (GA) plays important roles in cell division, bud growth and flower induction, in which related miRNAs and targets mediated regulation. Among them, miR396, 160, 393, and their targets associated with AUX, miR159, 319, 164, and their targets associated with ABA and GA, and flowering‐related miRNAs and genes, regulate bud growth and flower bud formation in response to shoot bending. Meanwhile, the flowering genes had significantly higher expression levels during shoot bending, suggesting that they are involved in this regulatory process. This study provides a framework for the future analysis of miRNAs associated with multiple hormones and their roles in the regulation of bud growth, and flower induction and formation in response to shoot bending in apple trees.