In search of better shape in mastopexy and reduction mammoplasty

"Bottoming out" of parenchyma after several months is a problem extant in previous techniques of mastopexy and reduction mammaplasty. The authors have addressed this problem by creation of a mobile, chest wall-based flap of breast tissue that is passed under and held in place by a loop of pectoral muscle. Experience with this technique spans a period of 7 years and includes 390 patients, indicating the permanence of this correction.     

External mastopexy with imbrication following explantation

The external mastopexy with inferior pull invagination is indicated in patients with grade II ptosis or greater and breast parenchyma less than 200 cc. Based on our experience with nine patients, the advantage of this technique is better inferior support with projection to the breast secondary to the imbrication.     

Incidence of breast and chest wall asymmetry in breast augmentation: a retrospective analysis of 100 patients

Although much is written concerning breast augmentation, few authors have addressed preoperative chest wall analysis as it pertains to postoperative outcome. In the present study, 100 patients were randomly selected, underwent bilateral augmentation, and were examined retrospectively by four independent physicians using standardized preoperative photographs. Each patient was examined for ptosis and asymmetry of the nipples, breast mound, and chest wall. Results revealed significant asymmetries in all parameters. Nipple-areola complex asymmetry was present in 24 percent (nipple/areola size) and 53 percent (nipple position) of the women. Mound asymmetry was noted in 44 percent (volume), 29 percent (base constriction), and 30 percent (inframammary fold position) of the women, and finally, 29 percent of the women had grade I to III ptosis. Chest wall asymmetry was observed in 9 percent of the women. Overall, 88 percent of the women had some degree of asymmetry, and 65 percent of the women had more than one parameter of asymmetry. These findings underscore the importance of developing a systematic preoperative breast and chest wall analysis that can be individualized for each patient. The resulting asymmetries should then be discussed with the patient, along with the potential for continued or even more pronounced asymmetry postoperatively.     

Evaluating breast parenchymal maldistribution with regard to mastopexy and augmentation mammaplasty

Mammary parenchymal maldistribution or lower-pole hypoplasia, a first cousin of the tubular breast deformity, is a common condition complicating the selection of patients for retropectoral augmentation mammaplasty and/or mastopexy. The eccentric mammary parenchyma must be released from the pectoral fascia to obtain good results with augmentation mammaplasty and to minimize the necessity for mastopexy.     

Guidelines in concentric mastopexy

The scope and technique of concentric mastopexy remain unclear and controversial. In our hands, the procedure has application for mild nipple ptosis, glandular ptosis, and areola asymmetry, as well as the tuberous breast. Early disappointment has changed to increasing satisfaction as we have gained confidence in predicting our results based on the identification of three simple principles of concentric mastopexy. The first and most important, which states Doutside less than or equal to Doriginal + (Doriginal - Dinside), requires that the outer concentric circle must be drawn not to exceed the original areola diameter by more than the original areola diameter exceeds the inner concentric circle diameter. The second principle, Doutside less than or equal to 2 X Dinside, recommends that the outer circle diameter be drawn not to exceed twice that of the inner circle, to prevent poor scarring or over flattening of the breast. The third principle, Dfinal = 1/2(Doutside + Dinside), allows prediction of the final areola size as the average of the diameters of the inner and outer concentric circles. These three principles allow excision of a maximum amount of areola and periareola skin without the side effect of poor scars, dilated areola, or misshapened breasts. Applying these three principles to concentric mastopexy with or without augmentation mammaplasty, one may confidently correct a wide variety of deformities, producing more symmetrical, attractive breasts with areolae of a predictable size.     

A system for breast implant selection based on patient tissue characteristics and implant-soft tissue dynamics

Primary breast augmentation patients have widely varying characteristics of their breast envelope, parenchyma, and adjacent tissues. When preoperative breast implant selection does not specifically address critical soft-tissue parameters individual to each patient, risks of complications increase. Complications that occur from failure to reconcile a patient's wishes for breast size with her individual tissue characteristics include skin stretch and thinning, ptosis, atrophy of parenchyma, implant edge or shell visibility, implant edge or shell palpability, visible traction rippling, "bottoming" deformities, and lateral implant displacement with widening of the intermammary distance. Previous dimensional systems address implant parenchyma base width relative to implant base width, but no published system adequately addresses or attempts to quantitate the third dimension, tissue stretch, that is critical to estimate amount of fill necessary in a wide range of breast and tissue types. This system addresses the tissue characteristics (T) of the envelope (E), the parenchyma (P), and the implant (I), and the dynamics (D) of implant and filler distribution that affect soft tissues. The acronym TEPID summarizes the key factors that determine aesthetic results and occurrence of problems and reoperations following breast augmentation. This simple, efficient, and clinically practical system focuses on only three tissue measurements to estimate implant volume required to fill each patient's existing breast envelope, on the basis of her individual tissue characteristics: base width of the parenchyma, anterior pull skin stretch, and areola- and/or nipple-to-inframammary-fold distance measured under maximal stretch. The surgeon then adjusts initial volume to address differences in degree of skin stretch (anterior pull skin stretch) and contribution of the patient's existing parenchyma to stretched envelope fill, and to address differences in implant dimensions and filler distribution dynamics. To base decisions of implant pocket location on quantifiable soft-tissue coverage thickness, the system measures soft-tissue pinch thickness of the upper pole and at the inframammary fold. Surgeon time required to measure, estimate, and make preoperative implant selection decisions is less than 5 minutes. This system evolved from compiling and reviewing measurements and results from 330 primary breast augmentations from 1996 to 1999, including round and anatomic implant types with smooth shells and two different textured shells. The TEPID system was then used concurrently with the previous dimensional system for patient tissue evaluation and preoperative implant selection in 627 consecutive primary augmentation cases over a 3-year period from January of 1998 to January of 2001. Implant selection that did not comply with the parameters of the system was necessary in only eight cases. The TEPID system is a simple, efficient, and clinically practical method that allows surgeons to base implant selection on clinically quantifiable, individual patient tissue characteristics.     

Complete one-stage,immediate breast reconstruction with prosthetic material in patients with large or ptotic breasts

Immediate prosthetic breast reconstruction is a relatively simple, quick procedure with no donor site morbidity. This report discusses immediate one-stage breast reconstruction using prostheses in 18 patients (19 breasts) who also required a contralateral reduction or mastopexy. In all cases, an inverted-T pattern was applied to both breasts. The mean age of the patients was 49 years (range, 32 to 62 years), and the mean size of the gel implant used was 330 ml (range, 120 to 550 ml); the implant was inserted in a total submuscular pocket in seven patients and subcutaneously in 11 patients. In two patients with multiple risk factors, the prosthesis extruded, and one patient required removal for a periprosthetic infection. In 10 patients with early stage disease (T1 or T2) with tumors more than 5 cm from the nipple-areola complex, the original areola (n = 3) or nipple-areola complex (n = 7) was retained as a full-thickness skin graft.The breast shape after submuscular prosthesis insertion is different than that of the contralateral breast after a mastopexy or reduction, and nipple-areola complex symmetry was difficult to obtain; thus, this technique was abandoned in favor of the subcutaneous position (using a modified Wise keyhole pattern with a de-epithelialized portion, which still allows two-layer closure).In the subgroup of patients with large breasts or marked ptosis, a single-stage breast reconstruction procedure can be performed with symmetrical incisions. The subcutaneous position allows for symmetrical shape and nipple-areola complex symmetry to be obtained. When the tumors are small and situated in the periphery of the breast, the nipple-areola complex may be retained as a full-thickness graft.     

The limited scar mastopexy: current concepts and approaches to correct breast ptosis

The literature on short scar mastopexy was reviewed, with a focus on the different techniques. Currently four techniques have been described: the periareolar, the vertical, the inverted-T, and the L-shaped scar. The different techniques were evaluated with regard to patient selection, operative techniques, scar length, and complications. A large number of techniques have been published for minimal ptosis, whereas for significant ptosis, the number of surgical options is limited. It is evident that limited scar techniques can be applied to all grades of ptosis, but there is no one technique that can satisfactorily correct all degrees of ptosis. Plastic surgeons should weigh the advantages and limitations of each technique to correctly address breast ptosis. This article reviews an algorithmic approach to correct all degrees of ptosis with mastopexy.     

Reduction mammaplasty with the "owl" incision and no undermining

Reduction mammaplasty has traditionally been done using the Wise pattern of incision. Because of the box-like effect in breast shape, the lack of projection, and the long scars associated with the inverted T incision, two techniques have emerged as alternatives: the vertical reduction of Lassus/Lejour and the "round block" periareolar technique popularized by Benelli. Each of these techniques has its pros and cons.The "owl" incision combines the features of the large periareolar reduction (Benelli's) and the vertical reduction (Lassus/Lejour); the horizontal inframammary scar is either made very short or completely eliminated. Volume reduction is done through a heart-shaped parenchymal resection, leaving the nipple-areolar complex over a supero-central pedicle. Maintenance of the central parenchyma behind the nipple-areolar complex and mobilization of the vertical pillars toward the center of the breast give excellent projection and diminish the lateral fullness. Enlargement of the periareolar skin resection diminishes the length and pleating of the vertical scar; conversely, inclusion of the vertical component to the periareolar technique eliminates the pleating effect of the periareolar incision. The short horizontal excision eliminates any resultant "dog ears" in the new inframammary fold. Thus, the discrepancy in the length of scars is better distributed. There is no skin or parenchymal undermining, so drains are not needed. Excellent results are obtained immediately on the operating table, and large volumes of glandular resection and correction of severe ptosis can be accomplished without compromising vascularity of either the nipple-areolar complex or the skin flaps.Ninety-four patients in a 7-year period were operated upon using this technique. Seventy-two had bilateral reductions up to 1900 gm per breast, 12 had unilateral reduction for symmetry following breast reconstruction, and 10 were patients with severe ptosis. Complications were rare and of a minor nature. No conversion to free grafts was done, even in the larger resections. One case required minor revision under local anesthesia, one case required bilateral re-reduction, and another case required unilateral re-reduction for continued growth of breast tissue. Almost 90 percent of the patients underwent procedures as outpatients.The owl-type incision and the supero-central pedicle flap are elements of a reduction mammaplasty technique that provides excellent projection and shape with minimal visible scars. It takes advantage of the positive features of the periareolar and vertical reduction techniques and minimizes their negative features. The new design of parenchymal resection improves the vascularity of the residual flaps. Additionally, it may better preserve the sensation to the nipple-areolar complex and lactation is not compromised.     

Anterior thoracic hypoplasia: a separate entity from Poland syndrome

SUMMARY: Women presenting with anterior thoracic depression, breast hypoplasia, and subsequent asymmetry are often diagnosed with Poland syndrome regardless of pectoralis involvement, or are placed in the generic category of breast asymmetry or skeletal dysplasias. Recently, though, the term "sunken chest" has been used to describe forms of chest wall depression that previously may have fallen under generic skeletal dysplasias. The authors believe that, combined with hypoplasia of the ipsilateral breast, superior location of the nipple-areola complex compared with the contralateral side, and normal pectoralis muscles, this represents a previously undefined and real condition called anterior thoracic hypoplasia. During the past 4 years, the authors have treated eight women who have presented with a diagnosis of Poland syndrome or pectus excavatum, all of whom share the same characteristics-unilateral sunken anterior chest wall, hypoplasia of the breast, superiorly placed nipple-areola complex, normal pectoralis muscle, and normal sternal position. All of the patients underwent correction of breast asymmetry and unilateral anterior thoracic hypoplasia with augmentation mammaplasty, a method that when tailored for each side yields good aesthetic results. The average age of the patients was 31 years and the average chest size was 34. Cup size, as measured by the patient's standard bra, was a B on the nonaffected side in all patients and an A on the affected side in all patients except one. Of the eight patients, seven had the right anterior chest and breast involved, whereas one patient had involvement on the left. For all of the patients, the nipple and areola of the hypoplastic side were smaller and in a more superior position compared with the contralateral side on visual inspection. In the eight patients, a total of 19 augmentations (15 primary augmentations and four revisions) and one mastopexy were performed. Ten inframammary-fold approaches and nine periareolar approaches were used, and all of the implants were placed in a partial submuscular position, except for two implants placed in a subglandular position that were converted to partial submuscular positions in a secondary setting. In all the women, the sternal head of the pectoralis muscle was present and the pectoralis muscle appeared to be equal in size compared to the contralateral side. Nine different types of implants were used. Average implant fill volume measured 412 cc on the hypoplastic side and 257 cc on the contralateral side. In follow-up, all of the patients were satisfied with their operation and rated their aesthetic outcome as very good to excellent. The authors believe that anterior thoracic hypoplasia is a real, previously misdiagnosed and undescribed condition, and that both chest wall and breast deformities can be corrected safely and with excellent results using proper augmentation planning and implant selection.     

Crescent mastopexy and augmentation

We have defined a group of patients with a lesser degree of moderate breast ptosis whose ptosis correction is not adequately improved by augmentation alone but requires some elevation of the nipple-areola complex. We have selected the crescent excision mastopexy to provide this additional needed lift. Experience with 26 patients employing this technique has helped to define the indications and limitations for this approach. It seems to adequately provide the additional needed lift when nipple descent has been no more than 1.5 to 2 cm below the inframammary crease. Complications such as scar widening (46 percent) were reviewed, but seemed to be well tolerated by the patients.     

The management of anterior chest wall deformity in patients presenting for breast augmentation

Anterior chest wall asymmetry is sometimes encountered in patients presenting for consideration of breast augmentation. The chest wall asymmetry or deficiency may be significant enough to consider reconstruction at the same time as breast augmentation in a small number of cases. Customized and prefabricated chest wall implants have been used in a variety of conditions including Poland syndrome, pectus excavatum, and sunken anterior chest. Careful moulage preparation and on-table implant modification are needed to "seat" these implants on the skeletal chest wall under the pectoralis major muscle. The chest wall implant provides a base for the subsequent breast prostheses and fills up a bony deficit that cannot be camouflaged by the breast prostheses alone.     

Refinements in transverse rectus abdominis myocutaneous flap breast reconstruction: projection and contour improvements

A surgical procedure with the transverse rectus abdominis myocutaneous (TRAM) flap for breast reconstruction is presented using parameters from the opposite normal breast to achieve a better cone shape in the new breast to project the nipple-areola complex. This cone projection is obtained through a vertical plication of both skin/fat halves of the TRAM flap and with two supraumbilical fat flaps to avoid cone collapse. The infraclavicular and axillary regions are filled with a de-epithelialized "fish-fin" cutaneous-fat or fat-only flap, which is placed as a lateral TRAM extension. The de-epithelialized lateral extremity of the TRAM flap folded over itself gives a mound shape to the lateral aspect of the new breast, and the inverted umbilical stalk attached to the TRAM flap imitates a nipple. This procedure is based on six breast reconstructions with a 2-year follow-up. The procedure is a simple, safe, and versatile way to mimic the opposite breast. It is mostly indicated for thin patients who have small to moderate breasts without ptosis or hypertrophy who refuse breast implants or request a mastopexy or reduction mammaplasty on the opposite normal breast during the same procedure.     

A technique of brachioplasty

Various techniques for the management of upper extremity contour deformities have been suggested since aesthetic brachioplasty was first described. Such deformities are commonplace with aging, after normal weight loss, and especially after massive weight loss such as is seen following bariatric surgery. Despite the multiplicity of procedures described for the correction of these deformities, there are still problems associated with current brachioplasty techniques, including incorrectly placed incisions, widened hypertrophic scars, and postoperative contour deformities. In addition, postoperative skin laxity and ptosis in the axillary region are frequently encountered in the more extreme deformities. The authors present their technique for upper extremity brachioplasty. This technique is suitable for patients with severe brachial ptosis and skin laxity, with relatively little lipomatous tissue, which may extend from the olecranon to the chest wall. The described surgical approach provides excellent overall extremity contour with favorable scars while simultaneously addressing axillary contour deformities.     

Maximizing breast projection after free-nipple-graft reduction mammaplasty

In 1922, Thorek described standard free-nipple reduction mammaplasty for gigantomastia. This technique provided a simple and effective way to perform reduction mammaplasty. However, the technique is frequently criticized for producing a breast and nipple with poor projection. Even with the standard modification of the original technique, the resultant breast and nipple may be wide and flat, with unpredictable nipple-areola pigmentation. To create a breast mound and nipple with projection and even pigmentation, the free-nipple-graft breast reduction technique is presented. The Wise pattern skin reduction markings and the superiorly based parenchymal reduction technique are used. After the nipple-areola complex is removed, as a free graft, the inferior pole of the breast is then amputated along the Wise pattern skin markings, leaving lateral and medial pillars of breast tissue, with the apex of the resection corresponding to the new nipple location. The lateral and medial pillars of the superiorly based breast mound are then sutured together. Key interrupted sutures are placed, beginning at the most inferior and posterior point of the pillars, while recruiting tissue centrally to increase the projection. The intersecting point of the inverted T, at 7 cm from the new nipple position, is then sutured to the fasciae of the pectoralis major muscle. If more central projection is desired, the vertical limb design can be lengthened. The tissue inferior to the 7-cm mark is de-epithelialized and tucked under the central breast, if needed, contributing further to the final breast parenchyma projection. The skin of the vertical limb of the Wise pattern is then closed with a dog-ear at the apex to further contribute to nipple projection. The nipple is replaced as a free, thick, split-thickness skin graft. The breast is temporarily closed, and the medial and lateral breast tissue excess is liposuctioned to create a more conical breast. Excessive medial and lateral skin is then resected, keeping the inframammary crease incision under the breast mound. Twenty-five patients underwent free-nipple-graft reduction mammaplasty using this technique between 1992 and 2000. An average of 1600 g of breast tissue per breast was removed. The average follow-up period was 36 months. Patient satisfaction has been very high.     

Reduction mammaplasty and correction of ptosis: dermal bra technique

A new technique for reduction mammaplasty or mastopexy techniques is presented, which the authors call the dermal bra. The surgical steps are described point by point. A series of 36 patients underwent reduction mammaplasty or mastopexy by means of this technique from January of 1998 to April of 2001. Thirty-two patients were followed; 28 presented satisfactory results, including a good mammary appearance, invisible scar, good and stable breast projection, and lasting results. Nipple-areola complex sensitivity was unchanged in all 32 patients. The overall complication rate was 12.5 percent (one patient suffered purse-string suture exposure, and three had a cutaneous rend). The advantages and disadvantages of this technique are discussed.     

Gynecomastia and the complete circumareolar approach in the surgical management of skin redundancy

Gynecomastia is a benign enlargement of the male breast due to a physiological or pathological factor that interferes with the balance between estrogens and androgens in the serum. Gynecomastia itself requires no treatment unless the persistent enlargement of the male breast is a source of embarrassment and/or distress for the adolescent or adult man. The indications for the surgical treatment of gynecomastia are founded on two main objectives: (1) the restoration of male chest shape and (2) diagnostic evaluation of suspected breast lesions. The diagnostic evaluation begins with an adequate history and a thorough breast examination helped by laboratory tests and instrumental research. Several approaches for surgical treatment have been described in the literature. Some problems arise in patients who have significant enlargement and ptosis of the breast that will require skin reduction and in some patients requiring nipple-areola complex reduction. The authors believe that the complete circumareolar technique with purse-string suture creates the best aesthetic results, with fewer complications, in patients with moderate and severe ptotic glandular breast enlargements that have skin redundancy combined with areolar enlargement. From 1995 through 1999, a total of 10 male patients with moderate to severe gynecomastia were treated surgically using a complete circumareolar approach. All patients achieved a good aesthetic contour of the chest. Only two patients required a revision of the circumareolar scar to correct postoperative enlargement.     

Subglandular breast reduction: the evolution of a minimal scar approach to breast reduction

The authors describe a new modification of the breast reduction procedure. By means of an inframammary incision, the breast is mobilized from the chest wall, and a "doughnut" annulus of breast tissue is removed from the undersurface of the gland. No skin is excised. The nipple-areola complex is left attached to a central core of breast tissue that receives its blood supply from the subdermal plexus of vessels. When the resulting defect is closed within the breast by strategically placed sutures, the base of the gland is narrowed, the breast is projected forward, and the circumareolar and vertical scars of other techniques are eliminated. The authors report their results in a series of 37 patients.     

Elimination of the vertical scar in reduction mammaplasty.

We describe a technique to eliminate the vertical portion of the inverted-T incision in patients who have combined enlargement of the breasts and moderate to severe ptosis. Initial preoperative markings are made, placing the new nipple site at the level of the transposed inframammary crease. The nipple-areola complex is then retained on a vascularized pedicle, with major reduction of the breast tissue being done in the medial and lateral quadrants. The nipple and breast tissue are then tucked underneath the superior skin segment and placed in this new position as one would do with the umbilicus in an abdominoplasty. Excess vertical skin is removed, and horizontal excess is collected at the midline as a small dog-ear. We have found that this dog-ear reduces markedly with time, rounding out the inferior portion of the breasts. The remaining small amount of excess skin can then be removed under local anesthetic at a later date. We have performed this procedure on 20 patients, with follow-up from 6 to 24 months.     

Nipple or areolar reduction with simultaneous breast augmentation

Patients requesting nipple or areolar reduction often desire simultaneous breast augmentation. A technique is described for implant placement by means of a nipple base incision with either nipple reduction or intraareolar reduction. Nipple reduction is accomplished by removing a ring of skin from the base of the nipple, while areolar reduction is performed by removing a donut-shaped area of skin whose inner diameter is at the nipple base. The elasticity of the areolar skin allows for access for saline implant placement. The resulting scar is well concealed. Results from 15 patients demonstrate that the technique is safe, practical, and appears to pose no increased risk of sensory changes to the nipple.