Polymorphic X-chromosome inactivation of the human TIMP1 gene.

X inactivation silences most but not all of the genes on one of the two X chromosomes in mammalian females. The human X chromosome preserves its activation status when isolated in rodent/human somatic-cell hybrids, and hybrids retaining either the active or inactive X chromosome have been used to assess the inactivation status of many X-linked genes. Surprisingly, the X-linked gene for human tissue inhibitor of metalloproteinases (TIMP1) is expressed in some but not all inactive X-containing somatic-cell hybrids, suggesting that this gene is either prone to reactivation or variable in its inactivation. Since many genes that escape X inactivation are clustered, we examined the expression of four genes (ARAF1, ELK1, ZNF41, and ZNF157) within approximately 100 kb of TIMP1. All four genes were expressed only from the active X chromosome, demonstrating that the factors allowing TIMP1 expression from the inactive X chromosome are specific to the TIMP1 gene. To determine if this variable inactivation of TIMP1 is a function of the hybrid-cell environment or also is observed in human cells, we developed an allele-specific assay to assess TIMP1 expression in human females. Expression of two alleles was detected in some female cells with previously demonstrated extreme skewing of X inactivation, indicating TIMP1 expression from the inactive chromosome. However, in other cells, no expression of TIMP1 was observed from the inactive X chromosome, suggesting that TIMP1 inactivation is polymorphic in human females.     

X-chromosome inactivation and cell memory.

Mammalian X-chromosome inactivation is an excellent example of the faithful maintenance of a determined chromosomal state. As such, it may provide insight into the mechanisms for cell memory, defined as the faithful maintenance of a determined state in clonally derived progeny cells. We review here the aspects of X-chromosome inactivation that are relevant to cell memory and discuss the various molecular mechanisms that have been proposed to explain its occurrence, with emphasis on DNA methylation and a recently proposed mechanism that depends on the timing of replication.     

X-chromosome inactivation and escape

X-chromosome inactivation, which was discovered by Mary Lyon in 1961 results in random silencing of one X chromosome in female mammals. This review is dedicated to Mary Lyon, who passed away last year. She predicted many of the features of X inactivation, for e.g., the existence of an X inactivation center, the role of L1 elements in spreading of silencing and the existence of genes that escape X inactivation. Starting from her published work here we summarize advances in the field.     

X-chromosome inactivation and selection in somatic cells.

X-Chromosome inactivation leads to the formation of mosaic cell populations in the somatic cells of mammalian females. Cells have either a maternal or paternal X-chromosome active. If an individual is heterozygous for a cell autonomous X-linked trait, then a set of built-in cellular markers is provided for the investigation of various developmental phenomena, including selection. In the absence of somatic cell selection the tissues of an X-linked heterozygote should all be mosaic and should have a mosaic composition approaching 1:1. If somatic cell selection is occurring, it should be detectable by a significance shift from the random expected 1:1 mosaicism. The system is effective at detecting selection acting on X-linked loci and on newly arisen somatic autosomal variants, and several examples of somatic cell selection are described. However, it is concluded that somatic cell selection, as described above, is not a normal aspect of ontogeny.     

X-chromosome inactivation in the human cytotrophoblast

Preferential paternal X-chromosome inactivation occurs in the cell lineages that differentiate first within the female rodent blastula (trophectoderm and extraembryonic endoderm). The present studies were designed to test the nature of X-chromosome inactivation (XCI) in the earliest differentiating cell lineage of the human placenta, the cytotrophoblast. Using glucose-6-phosphate-dehydrogenase (G6PD) polymorphisms as a marker system, term placentae were obtained from 13 female heterozygotes where parental allelic contributions could be determined. Chorionic villi were enzymatically digested and centrifuged in a Percoll density gradient to isolate a pure population of cytotrophoblasts, which was ascertained by cell culture, differentiation to syncytiotrophoblasts, and histochemical staining for alpha-human chorionic gonadotrophin (alpha-HCG). On electrophoresis, all 13 samples exhibited exclusive or near exclusive expression of the maternally derived X-linked enzyme variant, regardless of whether it was G6PD A or G6PD B. No intermediate bands were seen, indicating a single active G6PD locus per cell. The stromal cells of the villi, which derive from the mesoderm and differentiate later than the cytotrophoblast, exhibit random XCI. These findings establish preferential paternal XCI in the cytotrophoblast, the cell type first to differentiate within the human blastula.     

X-chromosome inactivation in development and cancer

X-chromosome inactivation represents an epigenetics paradigm and a powerful model system of facultative heterochromatin formation triggered by a non-coding RNA, Xist, during development. Once established, the inactive state of the Xi is highly stable in somatic cells, thanks to a combination of chromatin associated proteins, DNA methylation and nuclear organization. However, sporadic reactivation of X-linked genes has been reported during ageing and in transformed cells and disappearance of the Barr body is frequently observed in cancer cells. In this review we summarise current knowledge on the epigenetic changes that accompany X inactivation and discuss the extent to which the inactive X chromosome may be epigenetically or genetically perturbed in breast cancer.     

Structural heterochromatin and X-chromosome inactivation]

Our previous studies on the expression of the G6PD and alpha-GAL genes from the X chromosome of inter-specific hybrids of voles of the Microtus genus have demonstrated an unusual pattern of X-inactivation in the parents. The observed phenomenon was explained as the presumable result of nonrandom inactivation of the X chromosomes with a heterochromatin block in crosses involving Microtus arvalis whose X lacks a heterochromatin region and also of random X inactivation when both parents had heterochromatin blocks on the Xs. Based on known models, we discuss here the possible mechanisms of the effect of heterochromatin on X-inactivation; we give preference to the model postulating binding of nonhistone protein to the inactivation centre as the key event. The hypothesis we offer suggests change in chromatin conformation in the inactivation centre during packaging of heterochromatic region of a chromosome; the protein molecules diffusing along the chromosome towards the heterochromatin region by the "facilitated diffusion" mechanism may happen to be in the region of the X-inactivation centre, which, being in a favorable state, binds specifically to it; as a consequence, the binding probability of protein to heterochromatin increases as compared to chromosome without heterochromatin block.     

X-chromosome inactivation and the search for chromosome-wide silencers

X-chromosome inactivation leads to divergent fates for two homologous chromosomes. Whether one X remains active or becomes silenced depends on the activity of Xist, a gene expressed only from the inactive X and whose RNA product 'paints' the X in cis. Recent work argues that Xist RNA itself is the acting agent for initiating the silencing step. Xist RNA contains separable domains for RNA localization and chromosome silencing. While no Xist RNA-interacting factors have been identified, a growing collection of chromatin alterations have been identified on the inactive X, including variant histone H2A composition and histone H3 methylation. Some or all of these changes may be critical for chromosome-wide silencing. As none of the silencing proteins identified so far is unique to X chromosome inactivation, the specificity must partly reside in Xist RNA whose spread along the X orchestrates general silencing factors for this specific task.     

Early development and X-chromosome inactivation in mouse parthenogenetic embryos.

Early development and X-chromosome inactivation were studied in ethanol-induced mouse parthenogenones. About 24% of oocytes transferred to 0.5-day pseudopregnant recipients successfully implanted. However, only 49%, 20%, and 16% of implanted parthenogenones survived 5, 6, and 7 days later, respectively. Abnormal development was evident in every parthenogenone as early as 5 days after activation with the degenerating polar trophectoderm. These embryos were destined to become either small disorganized embryos or embryonic ectoderm vesicles bounded by the visceral endoderm. Only 2 of 51 representative 6- to 8-day parthenogenones sectioned had morphology of the normal egg cylinder, although growth retardation was evident. Spontaneous LT/Sv parthenogenones shared similar morphological features. In late blastocysts, the frequency of cells with an apparently inactivated X chromosome was lower in parthenogenones than in fertilized embryos. The failure of X-inactivation in the trophectoderm seems to contribute to the defective development of parthenogenones.