Is preoperative fasting necessary?

The effects of fasting and of histamine (H2) antagonists on gastric volume and acidity were studied in 56 baboons undergoing various surgical procedures under general anesthesia and randomly allocated into 4 groups; group A--fasted for 14 hours; group B--given 100-120 ml of water 3 hours before surgery; groups C and D--also given 100-120 ml of water 3 hours before surgery; in addition, the former received cimetidine 10 mg/kg IM and the latter ranitidine 1.5 mg/kg IM 30-40 minutes before anesthesia. There were no significant differences between groups A and B with respect to the gastric volume and pH. Both ranitidine and cimetidine significantly (P < 0.02) reduced gastric volume and increased gastric pH. Thus, prolonged withholding of oral fluids does not reduce the gastric volume or increase gastric pH. H2-antagonists are effective in reducing both gastric residual volume and pH.     

The pharmacokinetics of H2 receptor blocking agents in compensated liver cirrhosis

The bioavailability of oral and intravenous cimetidine and ranitidine was studied in patients with compensated liver cirrhosis. Single doses of 200 and 400 mg cimetidine were used for both administration routes, while ranitidine was administered in doses of 150 mg orally or 50 mg i.v. Plasma concentrations and urinary recovery were determined by the HPLC method. The pharmacokinetics of both of these drugs in the cirrhotic patients did not differ from those found in normal subjects. The two doses of cimetidine given i.v. gave rise to the same plasma concentrations, while after oral administration, 400 mg produced higher plasma concentrations than 200 mg. As to the pharmacokinetic parameters, neither cimetidine nor ranitidine administered i.v. offered any further advantages compared to the oral route. The urinary recovery of both cimetidine and ranitidine was higher after intravenous than after oral administration. It is concluded therefore that the pharmacokinetics of cimetidine and ranitidine is not altered in compensated liver cirrhosis.     

Healing of gastric ulcers after one,two, and three months of ranitidine.

Ranitidine (150 mg twice daily) was compared with placebo in 42 patients with gastric ulcer. The study was conducted as a double-blind trial for one month, followed by an open assessment of one, two, and three months of ranitidine in the patients with persistent ulceration. Thirty-eight patients completed the double-blind trial. Repeat endoscopy confirmed complete healing in 16 of the 21 who had received ranitidine and five of the 17 who had received placebo (p less than 0.01). The remaining 17 patients with persistent ulceration participated in the open assessment. The combined cumulative healing rates of ranitidine at four, eight, and 12 weeks were 73%, 88%, and 97%. There were no adverse effects or unusual reasons for withdrawal from the study (four patients). Ranitidine appears to be a safe and highly effective treatment of gastric ulceration, with about 90% of ulcers healed after eight weeks.     

Orange juice increased the bioavailability of pravastatin, 3-hydroxy-3-methylglutaryl CoA reductase inhibitor, in rats and healthy human subjects

Our objective was to investigate the effects of orange juice on the pharmacokinetics of pravastatin in rats and healthy volunteers. The pharmacokinetics of pravastatin (100 mg/kg p.o.) were assessed with water, orange juice, and carbohydrates (12.5 ml/kg over 30 min) and with acetic acid (0.1 M, pH 3.44). The pharmacokinetics of simvastatin (100 mg/kg p.o.) were assessed with water and orange juice. In addition, the pharmacokinetics (based on plasma levels) of pravastatin 80 mg/kg i.v. were assessed with water and orange juice (5 ml/kg) in rats. The pharmacokinetics of oral pravastatin (10 mg) were assessed when administered with water and orange juice (800 ml over 3 h) in a two-way crossover study in 14 healthy volunteers. Orange juice significantly increased the area under the curve (0-150 min) of pravastatin in rats. Orange juice had no effects on the pharmacokinetic parameters of intravenously administered pravastatin in rats. Carbohydrates and acetic acid with pH and concentration equivalent to those of orange juice also resulted in no statistically significant differences in pravastatin pharmacokinetic parameters in rats. Orange juice did not result in any significant differences in the pharmacokinetic parameters of simvastatin in rats. Orange juice significantly increased oatp1 and oatp2 mRNA and protein in the intestine of rats. Orange juice significantly increased the area under the curve (0-240 min) of pravastatin in healthy volunteers. In conclusion, orange juice increases the bioavailability of pravastatin administered orally. Oatp1 and oatp2 may be related to increases of pharmacokinetics of pravastatin by orange juice.     

Determination of ranitidine and its metabolites in human urine by reversed-phase ion-pair high-performance liquid chromatography

A method using ion-pair high-performance liquid chromatography is presented for determining ranitidine, ranitidine N-oxide, ranitidine S-oxide and desmethyl ranitidine in the urine from four volunteers, given on separte occasions an intravenous and oral dose of 100 mg ranitidine. This method has been used to study the metabolism and pharmacokinetics of ranitidine by man. It was found that the elimination half-life of ranitidine ranged from 110–246 min. The mean renal clearance of ranitidine in these four volunteers was 512 ml/min.     

Development of a sensitive high-performance thin-layer chromatography method for estimation of ranitidine in urine and its application for bioequivalence decision for ranitidine tablet formulations

A sensitive and simple HPTLC method was developed for estimation of ranitidine in human urine. The drug was extracted from urine after basification using dichloromethane. Dichloromethane extract was spotted on silica gel 60 F254 TLC plate and was developed in a mixture of ethyl acetate-methanol-ammonia (35:10:5 v/v) as the mobile phase and scanned at 320 nm. The RF value obtained for the drug was 0.67 +/- 0.03. The method was validated in terms of linearity (50-400 ng/spot), precision and accuracy. The average recovery of ranitidine from urine was 89.35%. The proposed method was applied to evaluate bioequivalence of two marketed ranitidine tablet formulations (150 mg, Formulation I and Formulation 2) using a crossover design by comparing urinary excretion data for unchanged ranitidine in six healthy volunteers. Various pharmacokinetic parameters like peak excretion rate [(dAU/dt)max], time for peak excretion rate (tmax), AUC0-24, AUC0-infinity, cumulative amount excreted were calculated for both formulations and subjected to statistical analysis. The relative bioavailability of Formulation 2 with respect to Formulation 1 was 93.76 and 95.31% on the basis of AUC0-24 and cumulative amount excreted, respectively. Statistical comparison of various pharmacokinetic parameters indicated that the two ranitidine tablet formulations are bioequivalent.     

Behavior of thyrotropic, triiodothyronine, thyroxine and cortisol hormone levels in blood serum of patients with duodenal ulcer treated with ranitidine]

Blood serum concentrations of thyrotropic hormone (TSH), triiodothyronine (T3), thyroxine (T4) and cortisol have been measured in 50 patients with duodenal ulcer. The determinations were repeated after a specific time of treatment with ranitidine: in 45 patients after 3 weeks and in 37 after additional 30 days of treatment. During the first period of treatment ranitidine was administered at a dose of 300 mg divided into two daily doses and during the second period of treatment at a single daily dose of 150 mg. A small but statistically significant changes, an increase in T3 and a decrease in TSH concentration, were observed before the treatment. No changes concerning these two parameters were found as an effect of the treatment. A decrease in the concentration of T4 was found, on the other hand, after three weeks of ranitidine administration. This decrease persisted after further 30 days of chronic treatment with ranitidine. No significant changes concerning blood serum cortisol concentration were found in any of the studied groups.     

Serum concentration of prolactin, gastrin and glycocholic acid in patient with peptic ulcer treated with ranitidine

In 66 patients with peptic ulcer (11 with gastric ulcer, 55 with duodenal ulcer, 19 women, 47 men) the serum concentrations of prolactin, dehydrocholic acid and gastrin were determined. The studies were repeated after treatment with ranitidine: in 50 patients after three weeks and in 40 patients after another 30 days. During the first period ranitidine 2 x 150 mg was administered, while during the second period the dose was 1 x 150 mg. The results were compared with those obtained from 120 healthy subjects. Before starting the treatment prolactin levels were significantly higher than those in the control group. During the treatment a significant decrease of the levels was observed. Similar changes of prolactin concentrations were found in the group of 39 men with duodenal ulcer isolated from the studied patients, who were compared with a group of 50 healthy men. It was not found that the development of peptic ulcer and the treatment with ranitidine exerted and effect on the changes of gastrin and dehydrocholic acid concentrations.     

Symptomatic gastro-oesophageal reflux disease: double blind controlled study of intermittent treatment with omeprazole or ranitidine. The European Study Group

ObjectiveTo assess intermittent treatment over 12 months in patients with symptomatic gastro-oesophageal reflux disease.DesignRandomised, multicentre, double blind, controlled study. Patients with heartburn and normal endoscopy results or mild erosive changes received omeprazole 10 mg or 20 mg daily or ranitidine 150 mg twice daily for 2 weeks. Patients remaining symptomatic had omeprazole 10 mg or ranitidine dose doubled for another 2 weeks while omeprazole 20 mg was continued for 2 weeks. Patients who were symptomatic or mildly symptomatic were followed up for 12 months. Recurrences of moderate or severe heartburn during follow up were treated with the dose which was successful for initial symptom control.SettingHospitals and primary care practices between 1994 and 1996.Subjects677 patients with gastro-oesophageal reflux disease.Results704 patients were randomised, 677 were eligible for analyses; 318 reached the end of the study with intermittent treatment without recourse to maintenance antisecretory drugs. The median number of days off active treatment during follow up was 142 for the entire study (281 for the 526 patients who reached a treatment related end point). Thus, about half the patients did not require treatment for at least 6 months, and this was similar in all three treatment groups. According to outcome, 378 (72%) patients were in the best outcome ranks (no relapse or one (or more) relapse but in remission until 12 months); 630 (93%) had three or fewer relapses in the intermittent treatment phase. Omeprazole 20 mg provided faster relief of heartburn. The results were similar in patients with erosive and non-erosive disease.ConclusionsIntermittent treatment is effective in managing symptoms of heartburn in half of patients with uncomplicated gastro-oesophageal reflux disease. It is simple and applicable in general practice, where most patients are seen.

Key messages

• Symptomatic gastro-oesophageal disease can be managed successfully in half of patients with intermittent treatment with antisecretory drugs
• Omeprazole 20 mg once daily gives more rapid relief of symptoms than either omeprazole 10 mg once daily or ranitidine 150 mg twice daily. However, the choice of antisecretory drug has little effect on the overall outcome
• Relapses are relatively infrequent and can be managed with short courses of repeat treatment
• Starting intermittent treatment with omeprazole 20 mg once daily is more cost effective than a dose titration approach with omeprazole 10 mg once daily or ranitidine 150 mg twice daily
• An intermittent treatment strategy is simple and applicable in general practice, where most of these patients are seen

     

Effects of gender and phase of the menstrual cycle on the kinetics of ranitidine in healthy volunteers

The present study was undertaken to determine if differences exist in the pharmacokinetic parameters of oral ranitidine caused by gender and stage of the menstrual cycle. The study was performed in two steps, in the first a pharmacokinetic study was performed on 10 men (average age 35.5 yrs) and 10 women (average age 34.7 yrs) during the follicular phase, and in the second the pharmacokinetic study was performed only on the same women in their luteal phase. Subjects received a tablet dose of 300 mg ranitidine, and blood samples were drawn at several times after its ingestion. Plasma ranitidine concentration was determined by high performance liquid chromatography. Comparison of the pharmacokinetic parameters of women and men revealed statistically significant differences both in distribution volume (Vd) with values of 2.0 and 6.3 l/kg, Area Under Curve (AUC) with values of 7312.15 and 11471.94 ng/ml/h, and clearance (CLt) with values of 0.65 and 0.59 l/kg/h, respectively. Several pharmacokinetic parameters in women were different in the follicular compared to the luteal phase; for example, Vd was 2.0 and 5.6 l/kg, AUC was 7312.15 and 5195.83 ng/ml/h, and CLt was 0.65 and 0.97 l/kg/h, in the respective phases. Moreover, the maximum concentration (Cmax) was 1086 ng/ml in the follicular vs. 864 ng/ml in the luteal phase. The first study detected differences between men and women in several pharmacokinetic parameters, mainly those indicative of drug availability, for example, Vd, AUC, and CLt. Comparison of data obtained in the follicular phase with those obtained in the luteal phase revealed differences in most pharmacokinetic parameters, which is seemingly indicative of the characteristic physiological changes associated with the luteal phase that largely affect the kinetics and availability of drugs such as ranitidine. Although it has been postulated that hormonal fluctuation within the menstrual cycle phase is the primary cause of documented gender differences in the pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics of drugs, further study of related factors is required to fully understand how gender and menstrual cycle rhythms affect the pharmacokinetic process in their entirety.     

Safety, pharmacokinetics, and pharmacodynamics of oral apoA-I mimetic peptide D-4F in high-risk cardiovascular patients

Patients with coronary heart disease or equivalent risk received a single dose of 30, 100, 300, or 500 mg of unformulated D-4F (n = 8, each dose) or placebo (n = 8) under fasting conditions. An additional 10 patients received 500 mg (n = 8) or placebo (n = 2) with a low-fat meal. There were no significant trends in any safety parameter. D-4F was detectable in plasma at all doses with a T(max) of 30 min, 1 h, and 2 h for 30, 100, and > or = 300 mg, respectively. The area under the curve((0-t)) was 27.81 ng/hr/ml and 54.71 ng/hr/ml for the 300 mg and 500 mg dose groups, respectively, and 17.96 ng/hr/ml for the 500 mg dose given with food. HDL from each time point for each subject was tested for its ability to inhibit LDL-induced monocyte chemotactic activity in cultures of human aortic endothelial cells. The values obtained were normalized to 1.0 for LDL alone to obtain the HDL inflammatory index. This index significantly improved at 4 h at the 300 mg dose and at 2 h at the 500 mg dose compared with placebo (P < 0.05). There were no changes in plasma lipid or lipoprotein levels. We conclude that unformulated D-4F has low bioavailability that is improved under fasting conditions, and that a single dose of D-4F is safe and well tolerated and may improve the HDL anti-inflammatory index.     

Is there a place in the United Kingdom for intensive antacid treatment for chronic peptic ulceration?

Sixty nine patients with chronic duodenal or juxtapyloric ulceration were studied in a prospective double blind randomised trial to compare the efficacy of antacid and placebo at high (30 ml seven times daily) and low (10 ml as required) doses. After four weeks ulcers had healed in 12 out of 18 patients (67%) receiving "low dose" antacid compared with in six out of 17 patients (35%) receiving low dose placebo; ulcers had also healed in six out of 19 patients (32%) receiving "high dose" antacid compared with in two out of 15 patients (13%) receiving high dose placebo. Overall, the effect of antacid was superior to that of placebo in healing ulcers (p less than 0.05) and the effect of low dose treatment was superior to that of high dose treatment (p less than 0.01). There were no significant differences between antacid and placebo at eight weeks. Antacid was better than placebo in relieving pain, but the difference was not significant. Poor compliance and high incidence of diarrhoea made high dose antacid an impractical treatment. Low dose antacid was associated with a significantly better rate of healing than high dose antacid and was far better tolerated. This low dosage of antacid should be considered to be an active treatment in trials of ulcer healing.     

Influence of aluminium on the immune system – an experimental study on volunteers

The purpose of this study was to examine whether oral exposure to aluminum (Al) can affect the human immune system. Eighteen healthy volunteers (mean age 42, 28–57 yr) were divided into a test group (9 females, 4 males) and a referent group (3 females, 2 males). Over 6 weeks, the test subjects ingested 10 ml of antacid (aluminum hydroxide, 59 mg Al/ml) three times daily. Aluminum was analyzed in urine before and during the exposure period (ICP-MS). Blood samples were used for analysis of lymphocyte subpopulations, mitogen-induced lymphocyte proliferation and in vitro production and circulating plasma concentrations of immunoglobulin (Ig) A, IgG, IgM, interleukin (IL) -2 and IL-4. Urinary Al concentration in the test subjects was approximately 10- to 20-fold higher than in the referent group during exposure. This indicates that ingestion of an Al-containing antacid is associated with an Al absorption far above that originating from food and drinking water. In both referents and test subjects the lymphocyte subpopulations, lymphocyte proliferation and the in vitro Ig and IL production showed similar, time-dependent changes before as well as during the exposure period. No major differences were seen between the referent and test groups regarding the immune parameters, except for a slightly smaller CD8+CD45R0+ population (primed cytotoxic T-cells), in the exposed individuals as compared to the referents. The results also show that subjects on antacid therapy may constitute a suitable population for studying biological effects of high-dose oral exposure to Al.     

Effects of Gender and Phase of the Menstrual Cycle on the Kinetics of Ranitidine in Healthy Volunteers

The present study was undertaken to determine if differences exist in the pharmacokinetic parameters of oral ranitidine caused by gender and stage of the menstrual cycle. The study was performed in two steps, in the first a pharmacokinetic study was performed on 10 men (average age 35.5 yrs) and 10 women (average age 34.7 yrs) during the follicular phase, and in the second the pharmacokinetic study was performed only on the same women in their luteal phase. Subjects received a tablet dose of 300 mg ranitidine, and blood samples were drawn at several times after its ingestion. Plasma ranitidine concentration was determined by high performance liquid chromatography. Comparison of the pharmacokinetic parameters of women and men revealed statistically significant differences both in distribution volume (Vd) with values of 2.0 and 6.3 l/kg, Area Under Curve (AUC) with values of 7312.15 and 11471.94 ng/ml/h, and clearance (CLt) with values of 0.65 and 0.59 l/kg/h, respectively. Several pharmacokinetic parameters in women were different in the follicular compared to the luteal phase; for example, Vd was 2.0 and 5.6 l/kg, AUC was 7312.15 and 5195.83 ng/ml/h, and CLt was 0.65 and 0.97 l/kg/h, in the respective phases. Moreover, the maximum concentration (Cmax) was 1086 ng/ml in the follicular vs. 864 ng/ml in the luteal phase. The first study detected differences between men and women in several pharmacokinetic parameters, mainly those indicative of drug availability, for example, Vd, AUC, and CLt. Comparison of data obtained in the follicular phase with those obtained in the luteal phase revealed differences in most pharmacokinetic parameters, which is seemingly indicative of the characteristic physiological changes associated with the luteal phase that largely affect the kinetics and availability of drugs such as ranitidine. Although it has been postulated that hormonal fluctuation within the menstrual cycle phase is the primary cause of documented gender differences in the pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics of drugs, further study of related factors is required to fully understand how gender and menstrual cycle rhythms affect the pharmacokinetic process in their entirety.     

Rapid determination of ranitidine in human plasma by high-performance liquid chromatography without solvent extraction

A simple high-performance liquid chromatographic procedure was developed for the determination of ranitidine in human plasma. The method entailed direct injection of the plasma samples after deproteination using perchloric acid. The chromatographic separation was accomplished with an isocratic elution using mobile phase consisting of 21 mM disodium hydrogen phosphate–triethylamine-acetonitrile (1000:60:150, v/v), pH 3.5. Analyses were run at a flow-rate of 1.3 ml/min using a μbondapak C₁₈ column and ultraviolet detection at a wavelength of 320 nm. The method was specific and sensitive, with a quantification limit of approximately 20 ng/ml and a detection limit of 5 ng/ml at a signal-to-noise ratio of 3:1. The mean absolute recovery was about 96%, while the within- and between-day coefficient of variation and percent error values of the assay method were all less than 8%. The linearity was assessed in the range of 20–1000 ng/ml plasma, with a correlation coefficient of greater than 0.999. This method has been used to analyze several hundred human plasma samples for bioavailability studies.     

Prevention of gastroduodenal damage induced by non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs: controlled trial of ranitidine.

OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the prophylactic effect of ranitidine 150 mg twice daily in patients requiring one of the following non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs: naproxen, piroxicam, diclofenac, and indomethacin. In addition, risk factors were studied in order to help in targeting of such treatment to specific groups of patients. DESIGN: Double blind, placebo controlled, randomised, parallel group with endoscopic assessments at 0, 4, and 8 weeks. SETTING: Multicentre outpatient study at secondary referral centres in five European countries. PATIENTS--297 patients with rheumatoid arthritis or osteoarthritis over the age of 18 without lesions in the stomach and duodenum at baseline endoscopy (after one week without taking non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs). Those taking other antirheumatic agents, concomitant ulcerogenic drugs, or treatment for peptic ulcers within the previous 30 days were excluded. Age, sex, arthritic disease, and type of non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drug used were comparable in the two treatment groups. In all, 263 patients completed the trial. INTERVENTIONS: Ranitidine 150 mg twice daily or placebo (plus the selected non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drug) was prescribed within five days after the baseline endoscopy for two consecutive periods of four weeks. Paracetamol was permitted during the study, but not antacids. Patients were withdrawn if the most severe grade of damage (including ulceration) was found at the four week endoscopy or when indicated, or with lesser damage at the investigator''s discretion. END POINT: Frequency of gastric and duodenal ulceration or lesions, or both. MEASUREMENTS AND MAIN RESULTS: The cumulative incidence of peptic ulceration by eight weeks was 10.3% (27/263); 2 out of 135 (1.5%) developed duodenal ulceration in the ranitidine group, compared with 10 out of 126 (8%) taking placebo. The frequency of gastric ulceration was the same (6%) for the two groups at eight weeks. Though significantly fewer gastric lesions developed in the ranitidine group by eight weeks. The frequency of non-ulcerative lesions in the duodenum did not differ greatly for the two groups at either time point. Twelve out of 75 (16%) patients taking piroxicam developed peptic ulceration, of whom two thirds had duodenal ulceration. Patients with a history of peptic ulcer were particularly susceptible to recurrent ulceration, against which ranitidine offered some protection. CONCLUSIONS: Ranitidine 150 mg twice daily significantly reduced the incidence of duodenal ulceration but not gastric ulceration when prescribed concomitantly with one of four commonly used non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs.     

Omeprazole and ranitidine in treatment of reflux oesophagitis: double blind comparative trial

One hundred and sixty two patients with endoscopically proved reflux oesophagitis stratified for severity, 66 with grade 1 disease (erythema and friability) and 96 with grade 2 or 3 disease (including erosions or ulcerations), were allocated at random to double blind treatment with omeprazole 40 mg in the morning or ranitidine 150 mg twice daily for up to 12 weeks. A patient could be evaluated sooner if symptomatic relief and endoscopically normal mucosa (grade 0) were noted after four to eight weeks'' treatment. Patients treated with omeprazole responded significantly more rapidly than those treated with ranitidine (p<0.0001), cumulative healing rates at four, eight, and 12 weeks being 90%, 100%, and 100% respectively for those with grade 1 disease and 70%, 85%, and 91% respectively for those with grade 2 or 3 disease in the omeprazole group. Corresponding rates in the ranitidine group were 55%, 79%, and 88% (grade 1) and 26%, 44%, and 54% (grade 2 or 3). Relief of the major symptoms of heartburn, regurgitation, and dysphagia and improvements in the histological appearance of the mucosa occurred earlier and were again more pronounced during treatment with omeprazole than with ranitidine.This observed superiority of omeprazole 40 mg in the morning over ranitidine 150 mg twice daily in the short term treatment of reflux oesophagitis was obtained without major clinical or biochemical side effects, but further research is needed into longer term use of omeprazole and the effects of the acid inhibition it induces.     

Effect of Basal Gastric Acid Secretion on the Pharmacodynamics of Ranitidine

Twelve patients with inactive ulcer disease were administered placebo and ranitidine via bolus and continuous intravenous infusions, at doses ranging from 50 every 8 h, to 12.5 mg/h for 24 h. Gastric acid was collected for 20 min each h for 24 h, and ranitidine serum concentrations were measured ± every 2 h, during each of the six study periods. Cosinor analysis of gastric acid secretion during placebo treatment revealed a significant circadian rhythm in all subjects. Mesor acid output ranged from 1.7 to 11.6 mmol/h (mean 5.6 ± 2.8 mmol/h) and the amplitude ranged from 0.7 to 6.5 mmol/h (mean 2.8 ±1.6 mmol/h). Peak acid output (acrophase) occurred at 10 p.m. ± 3 h. A pharmacodynamic model, relating ranitidine serum concentration to hourly acid secretion, was derived, which incorporated the circadian change in basal acid output. Data for this fractional response model included basal acid secretion–as determined by time of day, measured acid secretion, and associated serum ranitidine concentration. The 50% inhibitory concentration (IC₅₀) for ranitidine ranged from 10-75 ng/ml, with a mean of 44 ng/ml. The variation in IC₅₀ and in basal acid secretion combined to produce a wide variation in the pharmacodynamic response to ranitidine. The model-predicted serum concentrations, required to maintain acid secretion at 0.1 mmol/h, ranged from 250 to 1550 ng/ml, at the time of peak evening acid secretion. Despite a constant degree of acid inhibition by ranitidine during the day, higher serum concentrations are required during times of peak acid output to maintain adequate suppression of hydrogen ion secretion.     

Sensitive determination of ranitidine in rabbit plasma by HPLC with fluorescence detection

A sensitive high-performance liquid chromatographic method for determination of ranitidine (RAN) in rabbit plasma is described. The method is based on liquid-liquid extraction, labeling with dansyl chloride and monitoring with fluorescence detector at 338nm (ex)/523nm (em). Plasma samples were extracted with diethyl ether alkalinized with 1M sodium hydroxide. Ephedrine HCl (EPH-HCl) was used as internal standard. Both, RAN and EPH were completely derivatized after heating at 60 degrees C for 10min in sodium bicarbonate solution (pH 9.5). The derivatized samples were analyzed by HPLC using Agilent Zorbax Extended C18 column (150mmx4.6mm i.d.) and mobile phase consists of 48% acetonitrile and 52% sodium acetate solution (0.02M, pH 4.6). The linearity of the method was in the range of 0.025-10microg/ml. The limits of detection (LOD) and quantification (LOQ) were 7.5+/-0.18 and 22.5+/-0.12ng/ml, respectively. Ranitidine recovery was 97.5+/-1.1% (n=6; R.S.D.=1.8%). The method was applied on plasma collected from rabbits at different time intervals after oral administration of 5mg/kg ranitidine HCl.     

Effect of Basal Gastric Acid Secretion on the Pharmacodynamics of Ranitidine

Twelve patients with inactive ulcer disease were administered placebo and ranitidine via bolus and continuous intravenous infusions, at doses ranging from 50 every 8 h, to 12.5 mg/h for 24 h. Gastric acid was collected for 20 min each h for 24 h, and ranitidine serum concentrations were measured ± every 2 h, during each of the six study periods. Cosinor analysis of gastric acid secretion during placebo treatment revealed a significant circadian rhythm in all subjects. Mesor acid output ranged from 1.7 to 11.6 mmol/h (mean 5.6 ± 2.8 mmol/h) and the amplitude ranged from 0.7 to 6.5 mmol/h (mean 2.8 ±1.6 mmol/h). Peak acid output (acrophase) occurred at 10 p.m. ± 3 h. A pharmacodynamic model, relating ranitidine serum concentration to hourly acid secretion, was derived, which incorporated the circadian change in basal acid output. Data for this fractional response model included basal acid secretion-as determined by time of day, measured acid secretion, and associated serum ranitidine concentration. The 50% inhibitory concentration (IC₅₀) for ranitidine ranged from 10-75 ng/ml, with a mean of 44 ng/ml. The variation in IC₅₀ and in basal acid secretion combined to produce a wide variation in the pharmacodynamic response to ranitidine. The model-predicted serum concentrations, required to maintain acid secretion at 0.1 mmol/h, ranged from 250 to 1550 ng/ml, at the time of peak evening acid secretion. Despite a constant degree of acid inhibition by ranitidine during the day, higher serum concentrations are required during times of peak acid output to maintain adequate suppression of hydrogen ion secretion.